Fluorescent probe compound for zinc ion, as well as preparation method and use thereof

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to the field of organic light emitting materials, and in particular, to a fluorescent probe compound for zinc ion, as well as a preparation method and use in zinc ion detection thereof. The fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure has a name of 2-(7-(2,8-dimethyl quinoline-6-yl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl) phenol, and is synthesized with 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline and 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine as main raw materials. Fluorescence property tests show that the fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure has a high selectivity and sensitivity for Zn.sup.2+, a high chemical stability and a good water solubility, which particularly suitable for detecting Zn.sup.2+ in a water environment system. The excitation and emission spectrums of the compound are in a visible region, which could serve as a fluorescent probe applied to the field of zinc ion detection.

Claims

1. A fluorescent probe compound, named as 2-(7-(2,8-dimethyl quinoline-6-yl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl) phenol, with the following structural formula: ##STR00004##

2. A preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 1, comprising the following steps: uniformly mixing 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline, 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine, a metal catalyst, an acid and a solvent, reacting at 80-160° C. for 5-24 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product to obtain the fluorescent probe compound.

3. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 2, wherein a molar ratio of the 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline to the 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine is 1:0.5-1.

4. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 2, wherein the metal catalyst is selected from one or more of: copper acetate, copper trifluoromethylsulfonate, copper sulfate, copper chloride, cuprous chloride, ferric chloride, cobalt acetate, cobalt chloride and manganese acetate; and a mass of the metal catalyst is 1-5% of the mass of the 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline.

5. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 2, wherein the acid is selected from one or more of: formic acid, acetic acid, methylsulfonic acid, benzoic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, hydrochloric acid, trifluoromethylsulfonic acid, and trifluoroacetic acid; and a mass of the acid is 10-100% of the mass of the 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline.

6. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 2, wherein the solvent is selected from one or more of: ethanol, tert-pentanol, isopropanol, 1,4-dioxane, N,N-dimethyl formamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, toluene, p-xylene and water.

7. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 2, wherein a volume molar ratio of the solvent to the 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline is 0.5-3 mL:0.5 mmol.

8. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 2, wherein the purifying is by column chromatography purification.

9. The preparation method of the fluorescent probe compound according to claim 8, wherein an eluent for the column chromatography purification is a mixed solution of petroleum ether:dichloromethane:ethyl acetate in a volume ratio of 0.5-50:0-20:1.

10. A zinc ion detection product comprising the fluorescent probe compound of claim 1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a nuclear magnetic resonance hydrogen spectrum of the fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure;

(2) FIG. 2 is a nuclear magnetic resonance carbon spectrum of the fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure;

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph of fluorescence performance test results of the fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure under the condition of different metal ions;

(4) FIG. 4 is a graph of fluorescence performance test results of the fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure under the condition of different Zn.sup.2+ concentrations;

(5) FIG. 5 is a functional relationship diagram of the variation of fluorescence intensity with the mole fraction of Zn.sup.2+;

(6) FIG. 6 is a results graph of high-resolution detection of the fluorescent probe compound of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(7) The present disclosure is described in detail in connection with the following examples:

Example 1

(8) A preparation method of a fluorescent probe compound, including the following steps:

(9) uniformly mixing 0.161 g of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline (1 mmol), 0.111 g of 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine (0.5 mmol), 0.0016 g of copper trifluoromethylsulfonate (1% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline), 0.08 g of trifluoromethylsulfonic acid (50% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline) and 1.5 mL of toluene, reacting with stirring at 80° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 24 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product by column chromatography to obtain a fluorescent probe compound. The yield of this preparation method was 78%, and the fluorescent probe compound was presented as a yellow solid.

(10) The nuclear magnetic resonance hydrogen spectrum and nuclear magnetic resonance carbon spectrum of the resultant fluorescent probe compound were shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, and the structural characterization data was as follows:

(11) nuclear magnetic resonance hydrogen spectrum data: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=13.1 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.16-7.06 (m, 2H), 7.02 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (s, 1H), 4.57 (s, 1H), 2.80-2.69 (m, 4H), 2.69 (s, 3H), 2.64 (s, 3H), 2.60-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.12-2.03 (m, 1H), 1.99-1.87 (m, 1H).

(12) carbon spectrum data: 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.27, 158.00, 154.01, 153.05, 146.62, 139.92, 137.68, 137.26, 136.27, 130.48, 127.84, 126.23, 126.16, 122.53, 122.02, 119.64, 118.66, 118.19, 114.12, 108.27, 55.67, 29.82, 25.59, 24.89, 18.13.

(13) High resolution mass spectrometry (electrospray ionization mass spectrometry): theoretical calculation for C25H24N3O [M+H]+: 382.1914; found: 382.1917.

(14) According to the aforesaid data, it was presumed that the resultant fluorescent probe compound was 2-(7-(2,8-dimethylquinoline-6-yl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl) phenol, which had the following structural formula:

(15) ##STR00003##

Example 2

(16) A preparation method of a fluorescent probe compound, including the following steps:

(17) uniformly mixing 0.121 g of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline (0.75 mmol), 0.111 g of 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine (0.5 mmol), 0.002 g of cobalt acetate (2% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline), 0.012 g of p-toluenesulfonic acid (10% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline) and 1.2 mL of toluene, reacting with stirring at 130° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 15 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product by column chromatography to obtain a fluorescent probe compound. The yield of the preparation method was 69%, and the characterization result of the fluorescent probe compound was the same as that of Example 1.

Example 3

(18) A preparation method of a fluorescent probe compound, including the following steps:

(19) uniformly mixing 0.129 g of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline (0.8 mmol), 0.089 g of 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine (0.4 mmol), 0.006 g of copper acetate (5% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline), 0.065 g of trifluoroacetic acid (50% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline) and 1.2 mL of tert-pentanol, reacting with stirring at 100° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 10 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product by column chromatography to obtain a fluorescent probe compound. The yield of this preparation method was 76%, and the characterization result of the fluorescent probe compound was the same as that of Example 1.

Example 4

(20) A preparation method, of a fluorescent probe compound, including the following steps:

(21) uniformly mixing 0.064 g of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline (0.4 mmol), 0.089 g of 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine (0.4 mmol), 0.002 g of copper chloride (3% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline), 0.064 g of p-toluenesulfonic acid (100% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline) and 1.2 mL of p-xylene, reacting with stirring at 150° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 10 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product by column chromatography to obtain a fluorescent probe compound. The yield of this preparation method was 81%, and the characterization result of the fluorescent probe compound was the same as that of Example 1.

Example 5

(22) A preparation method of a fluorescent probe compound, including the following steps:

(23) uniformly mixing 0.129 g of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline (0.8 mmol), 0.111 g of 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine (0.5 mmol), 0.006 g of ferric chloride (5% of the mass of 2,8-dim ethyl tetrahydroquinoline), 0.077 g of methylsulfonic acid (60% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline) and 1 mL of toluene, reacting with stirring at 160° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 12 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product by column chromatography to obtain a fluorescent probe compound. The yield of the preparation method was 77%, and the characterization result of the fluorescent probe compound was the same as that of Example 1.

Example 6

(24) A preparation method of a fluorescent probe compound, including the following steps:

(25) uniformly mixing 0.161 g of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline (1 mmol), 0.111 g of 2-(2-phenolyl)-1,8-naphthyridine (0.5 mmol), 0.008 g of manganese acetate (5% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline), 0.097 g of trifluoromethylsulfonic acid (60% of the mass of 2,8-dimethyl tetrahydroquinoline) and 1 mL of p-xylene, reacting with stirring at 160° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 5 hours to obtain a crude product; and purifying the crude product by column chromatography to obtain a fluorescent probe compound; The yield of the preparation method was 64%, and the characterization result of the fluorescent probe compound was the same as that of Example 1.

Experimental Embodiment

(26) The fluorescence property of the fluorescent probe compound according to the present disclosure was measured, including the following steps:

(27) (1) Formulating a Probe Solution:

(28) formulating a solution of 2-(7-(2,8-dimethyl quinoline-6-yl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl) phenol with a concentration of 100 μM in methanol, i.e. a probe solution, and stored at room temperature.

(29) (2) Formulating Metal Ion Solutions:

(30) the metal ions including: Mg.sup.2+, Fe.sup.2+, Cu.sup.+, Cu.sup.2+, Sn.sup.4+, Co.sup.2+, Mn.sup.2+, K.sup.+, Li.sup.+, Ba.sup.2+, Ca.sup.2+, Cd.sup.2+, Ni.sup.2+, Fe.sup.3+, Al.sup.3+ and Zn.sup.2+; and the respectively solutions of them were prepared from the corresponding hydrochloride salts thereof. Taking a certain amount of metal salts, dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water to formulate a 10-2 mol/L metal ion solution, and stored for later use.

(31) (3) Fluorescence Property Test:

Experimental Embodiment 1

(32) formulating solution to be tested: taking 0.5 mL of the formulated probe solution and 0.5 mL of the formulated metal ion solution, mixing with 4 mL solution of a CH.sub.3OH—H.sub.2O (v:v=1:1) to obtain a solution to be tested of the metal ion.

(33) formulating blank solution: taking 0.5 mL of the formulated probe solution, mixed with solution of 2.5 mL water and 2 mL methanol.

(34) analyzing the fluorescence intensity of solution to be tested by fluorescence spectrum, and the analysis result was shown in FIG. 3.

(35) It can be seen from FIG. 3, in the solution to be tested, when the metal ions were Mg.sup.2+, Fe.sup.2+, Cu.sup.+, Cu.sup.2+, Sn.sup.4+, Co.sup.2+, Mn.sup.2+, K.sup.+, Li.sup.+, Ba.sup.2+, Ca.sup.2+, Cd.sup.2+, Ni.sup.2+, Fe.sup.3+ or Al.sup.3+, the fluorescence intensity of the solution to be tested changed slightly. Only the fluorescence intensity of the Zn.sup.2+ solution to be tested showed a significant fluorescence decay (all solutions to be tested were uniformly labeled as “zinc ion fluorescent probe compound+M”, F.sub.0 was the fluorescence of the blank solution, F was the fluorescence of the solution to be tested, the ultraviolet absorption at the wavelength of 254 nm was measured, and the ratio of F to F.sub.0 was taken as intensity change).

Experimental Embodiment 2

(36) In order to further verify the specificity of the zinc ion fluorescent probe compound to the zinc ion, a competitive experiment was conducted: adding the Zn.sup.2+ solution (10 NM) into the probe solution formulated in step (1) together with a solution of any other one of the aforesaid metal ions of the same concentration; testing the effects of other competitive ions on the Zn.sup.2+ selectivity of the zinc ion fluorescent probe compound respectively. The test results were shown in FIG. 3 (all test solution was uniformly labeled as “zinc ion fluorescent probe compound+M+Zn”). It could be seen that the detection of Zn.sup.2+ by the zinc ion fluorescent probe compound had almost no change before and after the addition of other competitive ions, which indicated that the designed fluorescent probe compound of the zinc ion had a strong Zn.sup.2+ selectivity and could meet the actual application requirements.

Experimental Embodiment 3

(37) Different concentrations of Zn.sup.2+ were added into the probe solution formulated in step (1) to test the fluorescence property of the probe solution, so as to determine the detection range and detection limit for Zn.sup.2+ of the fluorescent probe compound. The test results were shown in FIG. 4, it can be seen that the concentrations of Zn.sup.2+ were 0, 5×10-8 M, 1×10-7 M, 2×10-7 M, 4×10-7 M, 6×10-7 M, 8×10-7 M, 1×10-6 M, 2×10-6 M, 4×10-6 M sequentially, while the fluorescence intensities decreased from top to bottom accordingly, indicating that the fluorescence intensity of the fluorescent probe compound decreased gradually with the increase of Zn.sup.2+ concentration. When the concentration of Zn.sup.2+ reached 4×10-6 M, the fluorescence intensity of the compound had a dramatic decay. The detection range of the fluorescent probe compound for Zn.sup.2+ was from 0.05 μM to 20 μM, and the detection limit was 5×10-8 M, which indicated that the compound had a relatively good Zn.sup.2+ detection capability and a relatively high practical application value.

Experimental Embodiment 4

(38) In order to further confirm the mechanism of interaction between the probe and the metal ion, a preliminary analysis was preformed using Job's plot. The specific operation method was as follows: ensuring the total concentration to be a constant (10 μM), testing the fluorescence emission spectrum at 426 nm at different molar ratios of the probe to the metal ion, and depicting a functional diagram of the variation of fluorescence intensity with the mole fraction of Zn.sup.2+ according to the results. And the result was shown in FIG. 5.

(39) It could be seen from FIG. 5 that when the mole fraction of the zinc ion reached 0.51, one inflection point appeared, indicating that the zinc ion coordinated with the probe in a 1:1 relationship. Meanwhile, the aforesaid experimental results were further confirmed by the high-resolution detection data. As shown in FIG. 6, a major signal peak occurred at m/z 513.0353, this molecular weight was consistent with the molecular weight of C25H21Cl2N3OZn, of which the calculated value was 513.0347, which was within the error range. According to the aforesaid results, a possible coordination structure could be inferred (the structural formula shown in FIG. 6).

(40) The above embodiments are preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, and the present disclosure is not limited thereto. Any other changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications made without departing from the spiritual essence and principle of the present disclosure shall be equivalent replacements, and all are included in the protection scope of the present disclosure.