BINDER COMPOSITION COMPRISING FINE FILLER AND FINE GROUND GRANULATED BLAST FURNACE SLAG

Abstract

A binder composition in dry weight percentage comprises a) between 1% and 30% of at least one lime source, b) between 5% and 75% of ground granulated blast furnace slag, (c) between 20% and 90% of at least one filler, (d) between 0.1% and 5% of SO.sub.3.sup.?, e) between 0.1% and 1% of at least one water reducer polymer, f) between 0% and 2%, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one activator different from d, the weights of d, e, f relative to the total weight of components a, b, c, said ground granulated blast furnace slag and the filler each being a mixture of two differently sized particles, the different sizes based on d.sub.50 and range of between 1 ?m and 5 ?m and >5 ?m for the slag and between 0.05 ?m and <8 ?m and ?8 ?m and <200 ?m for the filler.

Claims

1. A binder composition comprising: a. between 1% and 30% in dry weight of at least one lime source; b. between 5% and 75% in dry weight of ground granulated blast furnace slag; c. between 20% and 90% in dry weight of at least one filler; d. between 0.1% and 5% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of SO.sub.3.sup.?; e. between 0.1% and 1% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one water reducer polymer; f. between 0% and 2% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one activator different from d.; said ground granulated blast furnace slag being a particles mixture of: between 10% and 100% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 1 ?m and strictly less than 5 ?m, between 0% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 5 ?m, said filler being a particles mixture of: between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 0.05 ?m and strictly less than 8 ?m, and between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 8 ?m and strictly less than 200 ?m, measurement of d.sub.50 being done by Laser diffraction analysis, also known as Laser diffraction spectroscopy, by means of Laser diffraction analyzer such as Mastersizer 2000 and commercialized by the MALVERN company, with the humid way method.

2. The binder composition according to claim 1, wherein the lime source is Portland cement or lime, such as hydraulic lime, calcium hydroxide, slaked lime, quick lime and lime slurry.

3. The binder composition according to claim 1, wherein the lime source is Portland cement, at least a portion of which being ultrafine cement having a d.sub.50, lower than or equal to 8 ?m, preferably lower than or equal to 3.5 ?m, measurement of d.sub.50 being done by Laser diffraction analysis, also known as Laser diffraction spectroscopy, by means of Laser diffraction analyzer such as Mastersizer 2000 and commercialized by the MALVERN company, with the humid way method.

4. The binder composition according to claim 1, wherein the filler is a natural material sourcing from stone-pit, such as calcite and its polymorphs, like aragonite or vaterite, and dolomite of precipitated calcium carbonates and mixtures thereof.

5. The binder composition according to claim 1, wherein the SO.sub.3.sup.? is from sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, calcium sulfate, anhydride sulfate, recycling gypse or mixture thereof.

6. The binder composition according to claim 1, wherein the water reducing polymer is selected from the group consisting of lignosulfonate polymers, melamine sulfonate polymers, naphthalene sulfonate polymers, polycarboxylic acid ether polymers, polyoxyethylene phosphonates, vinyl copolymers, and mixtures thereof.

7. The binder composition according to claim 1, wherein the activator different from d is an alkaline metal salt.

8. A dry concrete composition or dry industrial mortar composition comprising at least one aggregate and the binder composition according to claim 1.

9. A wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition comprising at least one aggregate, the binder composition according to claim 1 and water.

10. A hardened concrete composition or hardened industrial mortar composition obtained from the wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition according to claim 9.

11. A process for preparing the wet concrete composition or the wet industrial mortar composition according to claim 9 comprising a step of mixing with water, at least one aggregate and a binder composition comprising: a. between 1% and 30% in dry weight of at least one lime source; b. between 5% and 75% in dry weight of ground granulated blast furnace slag; c. between 20% and 90% in dry weight of at least one filler; d. between 0.1% and 5% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of SO.sub.3.sup.?; e. between 0.1% and 1% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one water reducer polymer; f. between 0% and 2% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one activator different from d; said ground granulated blast furnace slag being a particles mixture of: between 10% and 100% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 1 ?m and strictly less than 5 ?m, between 0% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 5 ?m, said filler being a particles mixture of: between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 0.05 ?m and strictly less than 8 ?m, and between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 8 ?m and strictly less than 200 ?m, measurement of d.sub.50 being done by Laser diffraction analysis, also known as Laser diffraction spectroscopy, by means of Laser diffraction analyzer such as Mastersizer 2000 and commercialized by the MALVERN company, with the humid way method, the binder composition being prepared before the mixing step or in situ during the mixing step from at least some of the different components of the binder composition taken separately and/or under the form of premix(es).

12. The process according to claim 11, wherein the ratio water to binder composition is comprised between 0.1 and 0.5.

13. A use of the binder composition according to claim 1 for the preparation of precast or ready-mix concrete or for improving the fresh state rheology of wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition.

14. The use of the binder composition according to claim 13, wherein the paste fresh state yield stress is comprised between 0 Pa and 200 Pa.

15. The use of the binder composition according to claim 13, wherein the paste fresh state viscosity is comprised between 0 Pa.Math.s and 5 Pa.Math.s.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The Binder Composition

[0046] The binder composition according to the invention comprises: [0047] a. between 1% and 30% in dry weight of at least one lime source; [0048] b. between 5% and 75% in dry weight of ground granulated blast furnace slag; [0049] c. between 20% and 90% in dry weight of at least one filler; [0050] d. between 0.1% and 5% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of SO.sub.3.sup.?; [0051] e. between 0.1% and 1% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one water reducer polymer; [0052] f. between 0% and 2% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one activator different from d.; [0053] said ground granulated blast furnace slag being a particles mixture of: [0054] between 10% and 100% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 1 ?m and strictly less than 5 ?m, [0055] between 0% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 5 ?m and preferably less than 15 ?m, [0056] said filler being a particles mixture of: [0057] between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 0.05 ?m and strictly less than 8 ?m, and [0058] between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 8 ?m and strictly less than 200 ?m

The Component a

[0059] The binder composition according to the invention comprises between 1% and 30% in dry weight of a component a, which is a lime source, preferably, between 3% and 25%, more preferably between 5% and 20%.

[0060] Preferably, the lime source is Portland cement or lime, such as hydraulic lime, calcium hydroxide, slaked lime, quick lime and lime slurry.

[0061] In case the lime source is Portland cement it is advantageous that at least a portion of the same is ultrafine cement having a d.sub.50 lower than or equal to 8 ?m, preferably lower than or equal to 3.5 ?m. This embodiment is advantageous since it allows obtaining increased compressive strength compared to the other embodiment.

The Component b

[0062] The binder composition according to the invention comprises between 5% and 75%

[0063] in dry weight of a component b, which ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) preferably, between 10% and 65%, more preferably between 15% and 50% and even more preferably between 20% and 40%.

[0064] According to the invention, at least a portion of the ground granulated blast furnace slag is ultrafine, i.e. made of particles having a do greater than or equal to 1 ?m and strictly less than 5 ?m.

[0065] In some embodiment, said ground granulated blast furnace slag is a particles mixture of: [0066] between 20% and 90% in weight, preferably between 30% and 80%, more preferably between 40% and 65% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 1 ?m and strictly less than 5 ?m, [0067] between 0% and 90% in weight, preferably between 20% and 70%, more preferably between 35% and 60% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the ground granulated blast furnace slag, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 5 ?m and preferably less than 15 ?m.

The Component c

[0068] The binder composition according to the invention comprises between 20% and 90% in dry weight of a component d, which is a filler preferably, between 30% and 80%, more preferably between 40% and 70%, even more preferably between 50% and 60%.

[0069] A filler is an inorganic material finely granulated which is inert. In other words a filler is not able to react with lime or cement, in the presence of water, so as to produce hydrates.

[0070] Preferably, the filler is a limestone filler, more preferably, the filler is a natural material sourcing from stone-pit, such as calcite and its polymorphs, like aragonite or vaterite, and dolomite or precipitated calcium carbonates and mixtures thereof.

[0071] According to the invention, the filler is a particles mixture of: [0072] between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 0.05 ?m and strictly less than 8 ?m, and [0073] between 10% and 90% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 8 ?m and strictly less than 200 ?m.

[0074] This filler partition, in combination with the GGBS partition, allows obtaining a technical effect of reducing the viscosity and increasing the compressive strength of the binder composition and of the concrete or industrial mortars according to the invention.

[0075] In some embodiments the filler is a particles mixture of: [0076] between 20% and 80%, preferably between 25% and 50%, more preferably between 30% and 40% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.50 greater than or equal to 0.05 ?m and strictly less than 8 ?m, and [0077] between 20% and 80%, preferably between 30% and 70%, more preferably between 40% and 65% in weight, in respect with the total weight of the filler, of particles having a d.sub.60 greater than or equal to 8 ?m and strictly less than 200 ?m.

The Component d

[0078] According to the invention, the binder composition further comprises between 0.1% and 5% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of SO.sub.3.sup.?.

[0079] The content of the SO.sub.3.sup.? is determined in respect with the distribution of components a, b and c. In other words, the dry weight percentage of the SO.sub.3.sup.? is determined by considering that the sum of contents of components a, b and c represents 100% in dry weight.

[0080] Preferably, the SO.sub.3.sup.? is from sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, calcium sulfate, anhydride sulfate, recycling gypse or mixture thereof.

The Component e

[0081] According to the invention, the binder composition further comprises between 0.1% and 1% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one water reducer polymer.

[0082] The content of the water reducer polymer is determined in respect with the distribution of components a, b and c. In other words, the dry weight percentage of the water reducer polymer is determined by considering that the sum of contents of components a, b and c represents 100% in dry weight.

[0083] Preferably, the water reducing polymer is selected from the group consisting of lignosulfonate polymers, melamine sulfonate polymers, naphthalene sulfonate polymers, polycarboxylic acid ether polymers, polyoxyethylene phosphonates, vinyl copolymers, and mixtures thereof.

The Component f

[0084] According to the invention, the binder composition further comprises between 0% and 2% in dry weight, relative to the total weight of components a, b and c, of at least one activator different from d.

[0085] The content of the activator different from d is determined in respect with the distribution of components a, b and c. In other words, the dry weight percentage of the activator is determined by considering that the sum of contents of components a, b and c represents 100% in dry weight.

[0086] Preferably, the activator different from d is an alkaline metal salt, preferably sodium chloride, potassium chloride, lithium chloride, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, lithium carbonate, calcium nitrate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, lithium nitrate, sodium nitrite, potassium nitrite, lithium nitrite, calcium nitrite, sodium thiocyanate, potassium thiocyanate, lithium thiocyanate, alkanolamines such as triethanolamine (TEA), triisopropanolamine (TIPA), diethanolamine (DEA) or mixture thereof, preferably calcium nitrate.

Optional Other Components

[0087] The binder composition is advantageously enriched with one or several other components which are ingredients, notably functional additives preferably selected in the following list:

Water Retention Agent.

[0088] A water retention agent has the property to keep the water of mixing before the setting. The water is so trapped in the wet formulation paste which improves its bond. To some extent, the water is less absorbed by the support.

[0089] The water retentive agent is preferably chosen in the group comprising: modified celluloses, modified guars, modified cellulose ethers and/or guar ether and their mixes, more preferably consisting of: methylcelluloses, methylhydroxypropylcelluloses, methylhydroxyethyl-celluloses and their mixes.

Rheological Agent

[0090] The possible rheological agent (also named a thickener) is preferably chosen in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in: starch ethers, cellulose ethers and/or gums (e.g. Welan guar xanthane, succinoglycans), modified polysaccharides-preferably among modified starch ethers-, polyvinylic alcohols, polyacrylamides, sepiolites, and their mixes.

Defoamer/Antifoams

[0091] The possible defoamer is preferably chosen in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in: polyether polyols and mixes thereof.

Biocide

[0092] The possible biocide is preferably chosen in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in: mineral oxides like zinc oxide and mixes thereof.

Pigment

[0093] The possible pigment is preferably chosen in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in: TiO.sub.2, iron oxide and mixes thereof.

Flame Retardant

[0094] Flame retardant (or flame proof agent) makes it possible to increase the fire resistance and/or to shrink the speed of flame spreading of the composition.

Air-Entraining Agents

[0095] Air-entraining agents (surfactants) are advantageously chosen in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in, natural resins, sulfated or sulfonated compounds, synthetic detergents, organic fatty acids and their mixes, preferably in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in the lignosulfonates, the basic soaps of fatty acids and their mixes, and, more preferably in the group comprising, more preferably consisting in the sulfonate olefins, the sodium lauryl sulfate and their mixes.

Retarders

[0096] Retarders are advantageously chosen in the group comprising, more preferably

[0097] consisting in tartric acid and its salts: sodium or potassium salts, citric acid and its salts: sodium (trisodic citrate) and their mixes.

[0098] In addition, other components may be: [0099] Plasticizers [0100] Fibres [0101] Dispersion powders [0102] Wetting agents [0103] Polymeric resins [0104] Complexing agents [0105] Drying shrinkage reducing agents based on polyols.

[0106] The total content of these optional other components in the binder composition is preferably comprised between 0.001% and 10% by weight of the total weight of the binder composition.

The Dry Concrete Composition or Dry Industrial Mortar Composition

[0107] The invention also relates to dry concrete composition or dry industrial mortar composition, in particular tile adhesive, coating, assembling mortars, repair mortars, renders, technical mortars and mortars for floor covering comprising at least one aggregate and the binder composition described above. The dry concrete composition or dry industrial mortar composition may eventually contain other admixtures and additions.

[0108] According to the invention, dry concrete composition or dry industrial mortar composition refers to compositions that are in the form of powder and ready to be mixed with water. In other words, the dry concrete composition or dry industrial mortar composition of the invention may content some moisture, but it essentially contains solid components which are intended to be mixed with water before its application.

[0109] Aggregates comprise a large category of particulate material used in construction, including sands, gravels, crushed stones, slag (not-granulated), recycled concrete and geosynthetic aggregates. They serve as reinforcement to add strength to the overall composite material.

[0110] Advantageously, said dry concrete composition or dry industrial mortar composition can also include, apart from aggregates, one or several ingredients, especially functional admixtures, additions and fibres, which can be the same as the other optional component mentioned above defined in the detailed description of the binder composition.

[0111] The total content of these optional other components in the dry concrete or industrial mortar composition is preferably comprised between 0.1% and 10% by weight of the total weight of the binder composition.

The Wet Concrete Composition or Wet Industrial Mortar Composition

[0112] The invention also refers to a wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition in particular tile adhesive, coating, assembling mortars, repair mortars, renders, technical mortars and mortars for floor covering comprising at least one aggregate, the binder composition described above and water.

[0113] In a specific embodiment, wet mortar compositions are so called Ready to use mortars. Ready to use mortars are used for assembling bricks or blocks on building site. They are obtained by mixing all the elements of the composition (binder, aggregates and others components) with water directly at the mixing plant. They include a set retarding agent, allowing transport and delayed use up to several days, while maintaining its rheological and hardening properties.

The Process for Preparing Wet Concrete Composition or Wet Mortar Composition

[0114] The invention also relates to a process for preparing the wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition described above comprising a step of mixing with water at least one aggregate and the binder composition described above, the binder composition being prepared before the mixing step or in situ during the mixing step from at least some of the different components of the binder composition taken separately and/or under the form of premix(es).

[0115] In other words, wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition could be prepared by two distinct methods.

[0116] In a first method, the binder composition is prepared, and then mixed with the at least one aggregate. The dry concrete composition or dry mortar composition is thereafter mixed with water.

[0117] In a second method, the wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition is prepared by mixing in water each component of the binder composition and the aggregates.

[0118] According to the present disclosure, the term mixing has to be understood as any form of mixing.

[0119] In a preferred embodiment a part of the binder composition and at least a part of the water are mixed together prior to the mixing with the aggregate.

[0120] In a preferred embodiment, the process is implemented with a ratio water to binder composition comprised between 0.1 and 0.5, advantageously between 0.15 and 0.45, and more advantageously between 0.2 and 0.4.

Hardened Concrete Composition or Hardened Industrial Mortar Composition

[0121] The present invention also refers to hardened concrete composition or hardened industrial mortar composition obtained from the wet concrete composition or the wet industrial mortar composition described above.

The Use of the Binder Composition

[0122] The invention is also directed to the use of the binder composition described above for improving the fresh state rheology of wet concrete composition or wet industrial mortar composition in particular tile adhesive, coating, assembling mortars, repair mortars, renders, technical mortars and mortars for floor covering.

[0123] Advantageously, for the use according to the invention, the paste fresh state yield stress is comprised between 0 Pa and 200 Pa, advantageously between 5 Pa and 100 Pa and more advantageously between 10 Pa and 50 Pa.

[0124] Advantageously, for the use according to the invention, the paste fresh state viscosity is comprised between 0 Pa.Math.s and 5 Pa.Math.s, advantageously between 0.1 Pa.Math.s and 3 Pa.Math.s and more advantageously between 0.25 Pa.Math.s and 1.5 Pa.Math.s.

[0125] The invention is also directed to the use of the binder composition described above for the preparation of precast or ready-mix concrete.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: The Synergistic Effect of the Particle Size Distribution of the Filler Particles and the GGBS Particles

[0126] Four mortars were prepared following to the mixing protocol and specimen size according to standard NF EN 196-1. The compressive strengths of these mortars have been determined according to standard NF EN 196-1. The compositions and the compressive strength are set forth in table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 CE1 CE2 CE3 E1 Component a (dry weight %): Portland cement 15 15 15 15 Component b Standard GGBS 22.5 22.5 12.5 12.5 (dry weight %) (d.sub.50 = 10 ?m) Ultrafine GGBS 0 0 10 10 (d.sub.50 < 2.5 ?m) Component c Fine limestone filler 0 10 0 10 (dry weight %) (d.sub.50 < 3 ?m) Standard Limestone filler 62.5 52.5 62.5 52.5 (d.sub.50 = 12 ?m) Normalized sand (0-1 mm) to components 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 a, b and c weight ratio Water to components a, b and c weight ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Component d (dry weight % relative to 2 2 2 2 components a, b and c total weight) CaSO.sub.4 Component e (dry weight % relative to 1 1 1 1 components a, b and c total weight) Component f (dry weight % relative to 1 1 1 1 components a, b and c total weight): Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2 4H.sub.2O Compressive strength after 24 hours (MPa) 10.1 11.1 14.3 15.7 Compressive strength after 28 days (MPa) 61.3 66.5 69.2 72.7

[0127] As can be seen from table 1, the compressive strengths of the mortar containing standard limestone filler and standard GGBS (CE1) are lower than the mortars comprising either ultrafine limestone filler (CE2) or ultrafine GGBS (CE3). The mortar combining both ultrafine limestone filler and ultrafine GGBS (E1) has compressive strength greater than mortars of CE2 and CE3, showing a synergistic effect of the combination of ultrafine limestone filler and ultrafine GGBS.

Example 2: Effect of the Quantity of Ultrafine GGBS

[0128] One additional mortar was prepared following to the mixing protocol and specimen size according to standard NF EN 196-1. The compressive strengths of this mortar have been determined according to standard NF EN 196-1. The compositions and the compressive strength are set forth in table 2 below in which example E1 is reproduced.

TABLE-US-00002 E1 E2 Component a (dry weight %): Portland cement 15 15 Component b Standard GGBS 12.5 8.5 (dry weight %) (d.sub.50 = 10 ?m) Ultrafine GGBS 10 14 (d.sub.50 < 2.5 ?m) Component c Fine limestone filler 10 10 (dry weight %) (d.sub.50 < 3 ?m) Standard Limestone filler 52.5 52.5 (d.sub.50 = 12 ?m) Normalized sand (0-1 mm) to components 2.25 2.25 a, b and c weight ratio Water to components a, b and c weight ratio 0.25 0.25 Component d (dry weight % relative to 2 2 components a, b and c total weight) CaSO.sub.4 Component e (dry weight % relative to 1 1 components a, b and c total weight) Component f (dry weight % relative to 1 1 components a, b and c total weight): Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2 4H.sub.2O Compressive strength after 24 hours (MPa) 15.7 18.7 Compressive strength after 28 days (MPa) 72.7 74.9

[0129] As can be seen from table 2, the compressive strengths of the mortar E2, comprising more ultrafine GGBS are greater than the compressive strengths of the mortar E1.

Example 3: Effect of Ultrafine Cement

[0130] Five additional mortars were prepared according to standard NF EN 196-1. The compressive strengths after 24 h of these mortars have been determined according to standard NF EN 196-1. The compositions and the compressive strength are set forth in table 3 below in which example E1 is reproduced.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 E1 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Component Portland cement 15 13 10 7 4 0 a (dry Ultrafine Portland 0 2 5 8 11 15 weight %) cement (d.sub.50 ? 3.5 ?m) Component Standard GGBS 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 b (dry (d.sub.50 = 10 ?m) weight %) Ultrafine GGBS 10 10 10 10 10 10 (d.sub.50 < 2.5 ?m) Component Fine limestone filler (d.sub.50 < 10 10 10 10 10 10 c (dry 3 ?m) weight %) Standard Limestone filler 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5 (d.sub.50 = 12 ?m) Normalized sand (0-1 mm) to 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 components a, b and c weight ratio Water to components a, b and c weight 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 ratio Component d (dry weight % relative to 2 2 2 2 2 2 components a, b and c total weight) CaSO.sub.4 Component e (dry weight % relative to 1 1 1 1 1 1 components a, b and c total weight) Component f (dry weight % relative to 1 1 1 1 1 1 components a, b and c total weight): Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2 4H.sub.2O Compressive strength after 24 hours 15.7 14.6 16.3 17.2 20.7 23.6 (MPa)

[0131] As can be seen from table 3, despite an insignificant decrease with the replacement of about 13% by weight of standard Portland cement by ultrafine Portland cement (E3), it can be concluded that the compressive strength of the mortars according to the invention increased along with the increase in the replacement ratio of standard Portland cement by ultrafine Portland cement.