Method for recovering residual blood from an extracorporeal circulation circuit and equipment for collecting and recovering residual blood in the extracorporeal circulation circuit
12005176 ยท 2024-06-11
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61M1/3601
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M1/3666
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M1/34
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61M1/36
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The processes and equipment for collecting and recovering residual blood from cardiopulmonary bypass provide increased efficiency in hemoconcentrators and hemodialysers. Residual blood collection and recovery equipment for extracorporeal circulation circuits include a flow-limiting valve disposed at an exit of a hemofilter, which automatically regulates a resistance in a line as a function of an inlet pressure. The valves of the residual blood collection and recovery equipment also include an opening that is proportional to a flow and a hematocrit. The systems and methods for blood recovery can be used after surgery or for hemodialysis, in addition to other applications.
Claims
1. A residual blood collection and recovery system for an extracorporeal circulation circuit, comprising: a hemofilter provided with hollow fibers, an inlet end, and an outlet end; a pump connected upstream of the hemofilter; an inlet flow sensor connected upstream of the pump; an inlet pressure sensor connected to the inlet end of the hemofilter; a flow-limiting valve disposed in the outlet end of the hemofilter, wherein the flow limiting valve comprises a flexible membrane molded in a sphincter format, wherein the flexible membrane is assembled inside a hermetically sealed rigid casing such that the flexible membrane divides an inner pathway of the flow limiting valve and is provided between a compartment filled with compressed air and a blood flow compartment, wherein the flow limiting valve is configured to transition from a closed position to an open position when a pressure of the blood flow leaving the hemofilter corresponds to an opening pressure of the flow limiting valve, wherein the flow-limiting valve mechanically and automatically regulates a resistance in a line as a function of the flow-limiting valve inlet pressure, wherein an automatic regulation includes a mechanical opening and closing of the membrane of the flow-limiting valve and wherein the automatic regulation is proportional to a flow in the line and a hematocrit; an actuator in fluid communication with the compartment filled with compressed air of the flow limiting valve; an outlet pressure sensor arranged in the hermetically sealed rigid casing of the flow limiting valve; an outlet flow sensor connected downstream of the flow limiting valve; and a computer processing unit (CPU) interconnected with the pump, the inlet flow sensor, the outlet flow sensor, the inlet pressure sensor, the outlet pressure sensor, and the actuator, wherein the CPU is configured to: drive the actuator for controlling the opening pressure of the flow limiting valve, continuously calculate a transmembrane pressure and a filtration efficiency, and maintain a transmembrane pressure at a magnitude lower than a maximum transmembrane pressure supported by the hemofilter hollow fibers.
2. The system, according to claim 1, further comprising: a piston installed in a casing of the flow-limiting valve to adjust an opening pressure of the membrane thereof at a beginning of an extracorporeal circulation process.
3. The system according to claim 2, wherein a pressure sensor embedded in the inlet end of the hemofilter measures the filter inlet pressure, together with the outlet pressure sensor, to allow the CPU to calculate the transmembrane pressure during the extracorporeal circulation process.
4. The system, according to claim 1, further comprising a pump, disposed upstream of the hemofilter equipped with a flexible and impermeable membrane installed inside a hermetically sealed rigid casing having cartwheel valves at the inlet and outlet, a pumping being provided through an outer driver that cyclically injects and sucks air or liquid into the compartment formed between said membrane and said outer pump casing, through a side connector.
5. The system, according to claim 2, further comprising a pump, disposed upstream of the hemofilter equipped with a flexible and impermeable membrane installed inside a hermetically sealed rigid casing having cartwheel valves at the inlet and outlet, a pumping being provided through an outer driver that cyclically injects and sucks air or liquid into the compartment formed between said membrane and said outer pump casing, through a side connector.
6. The system according to claim 1, wherein a pressure sensor embedded in the inlet end of the hemofilter measures the filter inlet pressure, together with the outlet pressure sensor, to allow the CPU to calculate the transmembrane pressure during the extracorporeal circulation process.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1) The procedure and equipment for collecting and recovering residual blood from cardiopulmonary bypass, object of the present invention, will be hereinafter described with reference to the appended figures, which, diagrammatically, and not limiting its scope, represent:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(16) The basic process for blood recovery, according to the present invention, is illustrated in
(17)
wherein: TMP=transmembrane pressure (mmHg) Pi=hemoconcentrator inlet blood pressure (mmHg) Po=hemoconcentrator outlet blood pressure (mmHg) Pn=value of the negative pressure applied to the ultrafilter effluent (mmHg)considered as zero for the implemented process Pme=maximum efficiency transmembrane pressure, defined by the user.
(18) To implement the process, as illustrated in
(19) The filtration efficiency depends on the defined TMP value, the inlet flow and the hematocrit and can be calculated by the following equation:
Ef=(Fv/Bv)*100
wherein: Ef=% filtration efficiency Fv=filtrate volume Bv=blood volume
or even by the equation
Ef=((If?Of)/If)*100
wherein: Ef=% filtration efficiency If=inlet flow Of=outlet flow
(20) Therefore, since the equipment of the present invention provides means for measuring the inlet flow and outlet flow using the above equation, it is possible to continuously calculate the filtration efficiency and control it in real-time. This is a feature that has never seen before in the prior art devices and systems for recovering residual blood from cardiopulmonary bypass.
(21) Additionally, a better result can still be achieved by the process and equipment illustrated, respectively, in
(22) Considering the process based on the algorithm of
(23) Furthermore, a more complete control of the entire system can be obtained by the process illustrated in
(24) Another way to achieve the same operating result is described above by a simpler equipment that uses a valve (11), herein called Physiovalve, provided on the filter outlet. This valve (11) has characteristics that allows it to carry out all the flow control and TMP performed by the above described systems, automatically and without the need for complex systems, since it mechanically implements the control algorithms above revealed.
(25) Said valve (11) comprises a membrane made of flexible and impermeable material, molded in the format of a sphincter and assembled inside a hermetically sealed rigid casing. It is molded in the closed position and it is forced to open by the time it receives the flow at its inlet. However, the opening is proportional to the pressure applied at the inlet, because, when the opening occurs, it compresses the air contained within the outer space, between the membrane and the casing, making pressure within this compartment. Thereby, the valve (11) opens until the pressure in the outer compartment equals the inlet pressure. Due to this characteristic, the valve (11) will act as a flow limiter. In addition, when injecting air inside the outer compartment of the valve (11), an opening pressure can be set, since the valve will only open when the inlet pressure is greater than the pressure inside the outer compartment. Therefore, if a so-called Physiovalve is installed and adjusted with an opening pressure lower than the filter's TMP at the hemoconcentrator outlet, the TMP will be forced to increase, since only flow through the valve will exist when the pressure at its inlet is greater than the adjusted pressure.
(26)
(27) In an example of evaluation of this system, one filter F50S from company Fresenius, provided with Physiovalve at the outlet, with an opening pressure set to 100 mmHg and inflow of 300 mL/min has been used. With these parameters, a 65.43% filtration efficiency, compared to 5% with the same filter, with the same flow and blood under the same conditions, but without said Physiovalve, has been achieved.
(28) Additionally, using the equipment (21) of
(29) In order to allow a more practical adjustment of the system parameters, the equipment (22) shown in
(30) Additionally, with the purpose of obtaining greater control of the process, the equipment configuration (23) illustrated in
(31) Also, when installing air flow sensors at the filter inlet and outlet, one can calculate the TMP besides the filtration efficiency of the system in real-time.
(32)
(33) As a general illustration,
(34) According to said
(35) Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, when the present invention is used for hemodialysis, due to high system efficiency, one may perform this procedure at low flow rates and high efficiency, thus reducing the required amount of hemodialysis solution and the total number of times the blood passes through the hemofilter, which generates less hemolysis and allows using a simpler and smaller equipment. These advantageous technical effects are achieved due to the low volume of hemodialysis solution required for the procedure, eliminating the realization of dilution of the hemodialysis concentrate with sterile water, as it happens in prior art systems. A pre-diluted solution may be used, thus eliminating the water treatment system and the currently existing dilution system in hemodialysis machines of the state of the art.
(36) It should also be noted that, although in the hemodialysis process there is blood recirculation and the hematocrit varies over the procedure, as the Physiovalve automatically regulates the resistance in the line as a function of the inlet pressure, there is no risk of breaking the fibers, because when the hematocrit increases, the Physiovalve opens, decreasing the resistance of the line and, thus, reducing the pressure. Accordingly, hemodialysis becomes safer, more practical and much more efficient when compared to the processes of the state of the art.
(37) The benefits of the blood recovery process and equipment according to the present invention are countless. As an exemplary citation, a typical hemodialysis session currently lasts an average of 4 hours. The blood flow used is 500 mL/min, with an average filtration efficiency of 5%. Thus, during the hemodialysis session, blood circulates 17 to 20 times through the hemofilter, and around 15 mL/min of filtrate is removed, using 100 to 120 liters of hemodialysis solution.
(38) In order to obtain the same hemodialysis results with the process and equipment of the present invention, only a flow around 30 mL/min would be needed. In these circumstances, the patient's blood would circulate only 1, 2 times through the hemofilter and only 6 to 8 liters of hemodialysis solution would be required. Obviously, this procedure would reduce drastically the blood damage, which increase the survival and quality of life of patients and would also allow hemodialysis to be performed in simpler facilities, since there would be no need for all currently existing infrastructure for water treatment and equipment would also be much simpler and smaller.
(39) It is further appreciated that with the process and equipment of the present invention, a drastic reduction in the hemodialysis session time is likely to occur, which would bring numerous benefits for patients and the health system. In this regard, studies are being carried out to determine such feasibility of the invention.
(40) Nevertheless, it is known that as the efficiency of the process and equipment of the present invention is much greater than that obtained by traditional processes and equipment, it would be possible to use smaller and therefore cheaper hemofilters, and still get better results than those currently obtained. This would make it possible to definitively cease the usual reuse of dialyzers, which would also imply a reduction in the labor, materials and infrastructure presently required for dialyzer reprocessing, in addition to increasing the safety of the procedure for patients and health care professionals.