Weld joint

Abstract

A weld joint with an excellent CTOD property is produced with a weld metal, using a steel plate as a base metal. The steel plate has a chemical composition including C: 0.03% to 0.09%, Si: 0.01% to 0.35%, Mn: 1.3% to 2.0%, P: 0.012% or less, S: 0.0035% or less, Al: 0.01% to 0.06%, Ni: less than 0.3%, Mo: less than 0.10%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.023%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.025%, B: less than 0.0003%, N: 0.002% to 0.005%, Ca: 0.0005% to 0.0050%, and O: 0.0030% or less, with the components additionally satisfying a predetermined relationship. The weld metal has a chemical composition including C: 0.040% to 0.090%, Si: 0.1% to 0.8%, Mn: 1.0% to 2.5%, Al: 0.020% or less, Ni: 0.1% to 1.0%, Mo: 0.05% to 0.50%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.050%, and B: 0.0015% or less, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities.

Claims

1. A weld joint produced with a weld metal, using a steel plate as a base metal, wherein the steel plate comprises a chemical composition including, by mass %, C: 0.03% to 0.09%, Si: 0.01% to 0.35%, Mn: 1.3% to 2.0%, P: 0.012% or less, S: 0.0035% or less, Al: 0.01% to 0.06%, Ni: less than 0.3%, Mo: less than 0.10%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.023%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.025%, B: less than 0.0003%, N: 0.002% to 0.005%, Ca: 0.0005% to 0.0050%, and O: 0.0030% or less, Ceq specified by formula (1) below being from 0.320 to 0.420, Ti/N being from 1.5 to 4.0, formulas (2) and (3) below being satisfied, and a balance being Fe and incidental impurities, yield stress of the steel plate being 355 MPa or greater, tensile strength of the steel plate being 470 MPa or greater, absorbed energy of the steel plate vE-40 C. at 40 C. in accordance with JIS Z 2241 being 200 J or greater, and the weld metal comprises a chemical composition including, by mass %, C: 0.040% to 0.090%, Si: 0.1% to 0.8%, Mn: 1.0% to 2.5%, Al: 0.020% or less, Ni: 0.1% to 1.0%, Mo: 0.05% to 0.50%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.050%, and B: 0.0015% or less, a balance being Fe and incidental impurities:
Ceq=[C]+[Mn]/6+([Cu]+[Ni])/15+([Cr]+[Mo]+[V])/5(1)
0<{[Ca](0.18+130[Ca])[O]}/1.25/[S]<1(2)
5.5[C].sup.4/3+15[P]+0.90[Mn]+0.12[Ni]+7.9[Nb].sup.1/2+0.53[Mo]3.00(3) where brackets [ ] indicate the content by mass % of the element in the brackets.

2. The weld joint of claim 1, wherein the steel plate further includes, by mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of: Cu: 0.7% or less, Cr: 0.1% to 1.0%, and V: 0.005% to 0.050%.

3. The weld joint of claim 1, wherein a hardness of a central segregation area of the steel plate satisfies formula (4) below:
Hvmax/Hvave1.35+0.006/[C]t/500(4) where Hvmax is a maximum Vickers hardness of the central segregation area, Hvave is an average Vickers hardness of a portion excluding the central segregation area and sections from both front and back surfaces inward to of a plate thickness, [C] is the C content by mass %, and t is a plate thickness of the steel plate in millimeters.

4. The weld joint of claim 1, wherein the weld metal further includes, by mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of: Cu: 0.01% to 0.20%, Cr: 0.01% to 0.50%, V: 0.001% to 0.080%, and Nb: 0.001% to 0.040%.

5. The weld joint of claim 2, wherein a hardness of a central segregation area of the steel plate satisfies formula (4) below:
Hvmax/Hvave1.35+0.006/[C]t/500 (4) where Hvmax is a maximum Vickers hardness of the central segregation area, Hvave is an average Vickers hardness of a portion excluding the central segregation area and sections from both front and back surfaces inward to of a plate thickness, [C] is the C content by mass %, and t is a plate thickness of the steel plate in millimeters.

6. The weld joint of claim 2, wherein the weld metal further includes, by mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of: Cu: 0.01% to 0.20%, Cr: 0.01% to 0.50%, V: 0.001% to 0.080%, and Nb: 0.001% to 0.040%.

7. The weld joint of claim 3, wherein the weld metal further includes, by mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of: Cu: 0.01% to 0.20%, Cr: 0.01% to 0.50%, V: 0.001% to 0.080%, and Nb: 0.001% to 0.040%.

8. The weld joint of claim 5, wherein the weld metal further includes, by mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of: Cu: 0.01% to 0.20%, Cr: 0.01% to 0.50%, V: 0.001% to 0.080%, and Nb: 0.001% to 0.040%.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(1) The reasons why the chemical compositions of the steel plate and weld metal have been restricted to the aforementioned ranges will be described for each element. The unit % in the chemical composition described below is mass % unless otherwise specified.

(2) First, the reason for limiting the chemical composition of the steel. plate that becomes the base metal is explained.

(3) C: 0.03% to 0.09%

(4) C is a necessary element for ensuring the strength of the steel plate that becomes the base metal. When the C content is less than 0.03%, quench hardenability is degraded, and it becomes necessary to add a large amount of quench hardenability-improving elements, such as Cu, Ni, Cr, or Mo, in order to ensure strength, resulting in a rise in costs. When the amount of C added exceeds 0.09%, the toughness of the weld zone degrades. Therefore, the C content is set in the range of 0.03% to 0.09%, and is preferably 0.040% to 0.085%.

(5) Si: 0.01% to 0.35%

(6) Si is added as a deoxidizing material and in order to obtain base metal strength. Adding a large amount exceeding 0.35%, however, leads to deterioration in weldability and toughness of the weld joint. Therefore, the Si content needs to be set in the range of 0.01% to 0.35%, preferably 0.28% or less, and more preferably 0.03% to 0.25%.

(7) Mn: 1.3% to 2.0%

(8) In order to ensure the base metal strength and the weld joint strength, Mn is added to a content of 1.3% or more. Upon the Mn content exceeding 2.0%, however, weldability deteriorates, quench hardenability becomes excessive, and the toughness of the base metal and the toughness of the weld joint deteriorate. Therefore, the Mn content is set in a range of 1.3% to 2.0%, preferably 1.4% to 1.9%, and more preferably 1.4% to 1.8%.

(9) P: 0.012% or less

(10) P is an impurity element and degrades the toughness of the base metal and the toughness of the weld zone. In particular, when the P content in the weld zone exceeds 0.012%, the CTOD property markedly degrades. Therefore, the P content is set to 0.012% or less, and preferably 0.009% or less.

(11) S: 0.0035% or less

(12) S is an impurity element that is mixed in inevitably. When the content thereof exceeds 0.0035%, the toughness of the base metal and the weld zone deteriorates. Therefore, the content is set to 0.0035% or less, and preferably 0.0030% or less.

(13) Al: 0.01% to 0.06%

(14) Al is an element to be added in order to deoxidize molten steel, and the Al content needs to be set to 0.01% or more. When the Al content exceeds 0.06%, however, the toughness of the base metal and the weld zone is degraded, and Al is mixed into the weld metal by dilution due to welding, thereby degrading toughness. Therefore, the Al content is limited to 0.06% or less and is preferably 0.017% to 0.055%. In this disclosure, the Al content is specified in terms of acid-soluble Al (also referred to as Sol.Al or the like).

(15) Ni: less than 0.3%

(16) Ni is an element useful for improving the strength and toughness of steel and is also useful for improving the CTOD property of the weld zone. Hence, the Ni content is preferably 0.05% or more. Ni is an expensive element, however, and excessive addition thereof also increases the likelihood of damage to the surface of the slab at the time of casting. Therefore, when Ni is added, the upper limit is set to less than 0.3% and is more preferably 0.06% to 0.28%.

(17) Mo: less than 0.10% (including the case of 0%)

(18) Mo is a useful element for increasing strength and may be included as necessary. On the other hand, Mo causes brittle martensite to be generated in the heat-affected zone. Hence, the content of Mo when added is set to less than 0.10%, preferably less than 0.08%.

(19) Nb: 0.005% to 0.023%

(20) Nb contributes to the formation of an unrecrystallized zone of austenite in the low temperature region. By performing rolling in such a temperature region, the microstructure of the base metal can be refined and the toughness of the base metal can be increased. Furthermore, Nb has the effect of improving the quench hardenability and of improving the resistance to softening at the time of tempering and is a useful element for improving the strength of the base metal. In order to obtain these effects, the Nb content needs to be at least 0.005%. Nb content exceeding 0.023%, however, promotes the generation of upper bainite and martensite, which degrade the toughness in the heat-affected zone. Hence, the upper limit on the Nb content is set to 0.023%, preferably 0.020%, and more preferably 0.008% to 0.020%.

(21) Ti: 0.005% to 0.025%

(22) Ti is precipitated as TUN when molten steel solidifies, which suppresses coarsening of austenite in the weld zone, thus contributing to improvement in the toughness of the weld zone. When the Ti content is less than 0.005%, however, such an effect is small. On the other hand, when the Ti content exceeds 0.025%, Ti/N coarsens, and it is not possible to obtain the effect of improving the toughness of the base metal and the weld zone. Therefore, the Ti content is set to be from 0.005% to 0.025%, preferably 0.006% to 0.020%, and more preferably 0.008% to 0.016%.

(23) B: less than 0.0003%

(24) When steel is cooled from the austenite region, B exists in a segregated manner at austenite grain boundaries, suppresses ferrite transformation, and generates bainite microstructures that include a large amount of martensite. The addition of B makes the microstructure brittle particularly in the heat-affected zone and is therefore limited to less than 0.0003%.

(25) N: 0.002% to 0.005%

(26) N reacts with Ti and Al to form precipitates. Crystal grains are thereby refined, and the toughness of the base metal is improved. Furthermore, N is a necessary element for forming Ti/N, which suppresses coarsening of the microstructure of the weld zone. In order to obtain such effects, the N content needs to be set to 0.002% or more. On the other hand, when the N content exceeds 0.005%, solute N markedly degrades the toughness of the base metal and the weld zone and leads to a deterioration in strength due to a reduction in solute Nb caused by generation of complex precipitates of Ti/Nb. Therefore, the upper limit on the N content is set to 0.005% and is more preferably 0.0025% to 0.0045%.

(27) Ca: 0.0005% to 0.0050%

(28) Ca is an element that improves toughness by fixing S. In order to obtain this effect, the Ca content needs to be at least 0.0005%. Ca content exceeding 0.0050%, however, causes saturation of the effect. Therefore, Ca is added in the range of 0.0005% to 0.0050% and more preferably 0.008% to 0.0035%.

(29) O: 0.0030% or less

(30) If the O content exceeds 0.0030%, the toughness of the base metal deteriorates. Hence, the O content is set to 0.0030% or less, preferably 0.0025% or less.

(31) It is also crucial that Ceq as specified by formula (1) below be 0.320 to 0.420, that Ti/N be 1.5 to 4.0, and that formulas (2) and (3) below be satisfied, where the brackets [ ] in each formula indicate the content (mass %) of the element in the brackets.
Ceq=[C]+[Mn]/6+([Cu]+[Ni])/15+([Cr]+[Mo]+[V])/5(1)
0<{[Ca](0.18+130[Ca])[O]}/1.25/[S]<1(2)
5.5[C].sup.4/3+15[P]+0.90[Mn]+0.12[Ni]+7.9[Nb].sup.1/2+0.53[Mo]3.00 (3)

(32) Ceq: 0.320 to 0.420

(33) When Ceq specified by formula (1) is less than 0.320, a strength that has 355 MPa grade yield stress is difficult to obtain. On the other hand, if Ceq exceeds 0.420, the weldability and the toughness of the weld zone deteriorate. Hence, Ceq is set to 0.420 or less and is preferably 0.340 to 0.420.

(34) Ti/N: 1.5 to 4.0

(35) When the value of Ti/N is less than 1.5, the amount of Ti/N formed decreases, and solute N not forming Ti/N degrades the toughness of the weld zone. When the value of Ti/N exceeds 4.0, Ti/N is coarsened and degrades the toughness of the weld zone. Accordingly, the range of Ti/N is 1.5 to 4.0, preferably 1.8 to 3.5. Ti/N is the ratio of the content (mass %) of each element.
0<{[Ca](0.18+130[Ca])[O]}/1.25/[S]<1

(36) The expression {[Ca](0.18+130[Ca])[O]}/1.25/[S] is a value representing the Atomic Concentration Ratio (ACR) of Ca and S, which are effective for sulfide morphological control. The sulfide morphology can be estimated by this value, and this value needs to be specified in order to finely disperse CaS which does not dissolve even at high temperatures and which acts as nuclei for ferrite transformation. In other words, when ACR is 0 or less, CaS is not crystallized. Consequently, S is precipitated in the form of MnS only, thereby making it impossible to obtain ferrite product nuclei in the heat-affected zone. Furthermore, the MnS precipitated alone is elongated during rolling and causes degradation in the toughness of the base metal.

(37) On the other hand, when ACR is 1 or greater, S is completely fixed by Ca, and MnS that functions as a ferrite product nucleus is no longer precipitated on CaS. Therefore, complex sulfides can no longer achieve the fine dispersion of ferrite product nuclei, making it impossible to obtain the effect of improving toughness. In this way, when ACR is greater than 0 and less than 1, MnS precipitates on CaS to form complex sulfides, which function effectively as ferrite product nuclei. The ACR value is preferably in the range of 0.2 to 0.8.
5.5[C].sup.4/3+15[P]+0.90[Mn]+0.12[Ni]+7.9[Nb].sup.1/2+0.53[Mo]3.00

(38) The value of 5.5[C].sup.4/3+15[P]+0.90[Mn]+0.12[Ni]+7.9[Nb].sup.1/2+0.53[Mo] is the hardness index of the central segregation area formed by components that are likely to be concentrated in the central segregation area and is referred to below as the Ceq* value. A CTOD test is carried out over the entire thickness of a steel plate. Accordingly, test pieces used in the test include central segregation. If the composition concentration in the central segregation is significant, a hardened region occurs in the heat-affected zone, preventing a good CTOD value from being obtained. By controlling the Ceq* value to be in an appropriate range, an excessive increase in hardness in the central segregation area can be suppressed, and an excellent CTOD property can be obtained even in the weld zone of thick steel material. The appropriate range of the Ceq* value has been experimentally obtained. When the Ceq* value exceeds 3.00, the CTOD property is degraded. Therefore, the Ceq* value is set to be 3.00 or less, preferably 2.90 or less.

(39) The basic chemical composition of this disclosure has been described, but in order to further improve the steel properties, at least one selected from the group consisting of Cu: 0.7% or less, Cr: 0.1% to 1.0%, and V: 0.005% to 0.050% may be added.

(40) Cu: 0.7% or less

(41) Cu is effective for increasing the strength of the base metal. To this end, Cu is preferably added in an amount of 0.1% or more. If the amount added exceeds 0.7%, however, the hot ductility deteriorates. Hence, the amount is preferably 0.7% or less, more preferably 0.6% or less.

(42) Cr: 0.1% to 1.0%

(43) Cr is an element effective in increasing the strength of the base metal. In order to obtain this effect, the Cr content is preferably set to 0.1% or more. However, since excess Cr adversely affects toughness, the Cr content is preferably set to 1.0% or less when added, and more preferably 0.2% to 0.8%.

(44) V: 0.005% to 0.050%

(45) V is an element that is effective in improving the strength and toughness of the base metal at a content of 0.005% or more. Setting the V content to exceed 0.050%, however, leads to deterioration of toughness. Therefore, the V content is preferably 0.005% to 0.050% when added.

(46) Furthermore, specifying the toughness of the central segregation area in the steel plate as indicated below is useful for improving the CTOD property.
Hvmax/Hvave1.35+0.006/[C]t/500

(47) First, in the expression above, Hvmax is the maximum Vickers hardness of the central segregation area, Hvave is the average Vickers hardness of a portion excluding the central segregation area and sections from both front and back surfaces inward to of the plate thickness, [C] is the C content (mass %), and t is the plate thickness (mm).

(48) In other words, Hvmax/Hvave is a dimensionless parameter expressing the hardness of the central segregation area. If this value becomes higher than the value calculated by 1.35+0.006/[C]t/500, the CTOD value degrades. Therefore, Hvmax/Hvave is preferably set to be equal to or less than 1.35+0.006/[C]t/500, more preferably equal to or less than 1.25+0.006/[C]t/500.

(49) Hvmax is calculated by measuring, in the thickness direction of the steel plate, a (plate thickness/40) mm range that includes the central segregation area in a Vickers hardness tester (load of 10 kgf) at 0.25 mm intervals in the plate thickness direction and taking the maximum value among the resulting measured values. Hvave is calculated as the average of values obtained by measuring a range between a position at plate thickness from the steel plate front surface and a position at plate thickness from the back surface, excluding the central segregation area, in a Vickers hardness tester with a load of 10 kgf at constant intervals in the plate thickness direction (for example, 1 mm to 2 mm).

(50) Next, the reason for limiting each element in the chemical composition of the weld metal is explained.

(51) C: 0.040% to 0.090%

(52) In order to ensure the strength of the weld metal, it is necessary to add C to a content of 0.04% or more. On the other hand, C content exceeding 0.09% leads to deterioration in toughness due to excessive quench hardenability. Accordingly, the C content is set to be from 0.04% to 0.09% and is preferably 0.050% to 0.085%.

(53) Si: 0.1% to 0.8%

(54) Si is added to ensure deoxidation and strength, but if the content is less than 0.1%, the fluidity of the weld metal is reduced, increasing the likelihood of weld defects. If the Si content exceeds 0.8%, the strength of the weld metal becomes excessive, causing cracks and reducing the toughness. Accordingly, the Si content is set to be from 0.1% to 0.8%, is preferably 0.1% to 0.6%, and is more preferably 0.1% to 0.5%.

(55) Mn: 1.0% to 2.5%

(56) In order to ensure the strength of the weld metal, it is necessary to add Mn to a content of 1.0% or more. However, Mn content exceeding 2.5% causes excessive quench hardenability, and the toughness reduces. Accordingly, the Mn content is set to be from 1.0% to 2.5% and is preferably 1.0% to 2.0%.

(57) Al: 0.020% or less

(58) Al needs to be added for deoxidation, preferably to 0.004% or more. If the content exceeds 0.020%, however, many inclusions occur, and the generation of Ti oxides is suppressed, leading to coarsening of the weld metal microstructure and reducing toughness. Hence, the Al content is set to 0.020% or less.

(59) Ni: 0.1% to 1.0%

(60) Addition of Ni is necessary to guarantee the strength and toughness of the weld metal, but these effects are not achieved at a content of less than 0.1%. Conversely, Ni content exceeding 1.0% reduces fluidity. Accordingly, the Ni content is set to be from 0.1% to 1.0% and is preferably 0.1% to 0.8%.

(61) Mo: 0.05% to 0.50%

(62) Addition of Mo is necessary to guarantee the strength and toughness of the weld metal, but these effects are not achieved at a content of less than 0.05%. Mo content exceeding 0.50%, however, causes saturation of these effects. Therefore, the upper limit on Mo is set at 0.50%, and the content is preferably 0.08% to 0.45%.

(63) Ti: 0.005% to 0.050%

(64) Ti fixes the N in the weld metal as Ti/N, forms oxides, and fulfills an important function as a product nucleus for acicular ferrite. If the N content is less than 0.005%, these effects are not sufficiently achieved, whereas if the content exceeds 0.050%, solute Ti increases, causing a significant degradation in toughness. Accordingly, the Ti content is set to be from 0.005% to 0.050% and is preferably 0.006% to 0.045%.

(65) B: 0.0015% or less

(66) B is effective for increasing the strength of the weld metal and is therefore preferably added to a content of 0.0003% or more. Excessive addition of B, however, generates coarse iron-carbon borides. Hence the content of B is set to 0.0015% or less.

(67) Furthermore, Cu, Cr, V, and Nb may be added independently or in combination as optional elements for adjusting quench hardenability by welding heat input.

(68) Cu: 0.01% to 0.20%

(69) Cu is effective for increasing the strength of the weld metal. In order to achieve this effect, Cu is preferably added to a content of 0.01% or more, but upon exceeding 0.20%, high-temperature cracks and a reduction in toughness occur. Hence, the content of Cu is preferably set to 0.20% or less.

(70) Cr: 0.01% to 0.50%

(71) Cr is effective for increasing the strength of the weld metal. In order to achieve this effect, Cr is preferably added to a content of 0.01% or more. Cr content exceeding 0.50%, however, reduces toughness. Hence, the Cr content is preferably set to 0.50% or less,

(72) V: 0.001% to 0.080%

(73) V is effective for increasing the strength of the weld metal. In order to achieve this effect, V is preferably added to a content of 0.001% or more. V content exceeding 0.080%, however, reduces toughness. Hence, the V content is preferably set to 0.080% or less.

(74) Nb: 0.001% to 0.040%

(75) Nb is effective for increasing the strength of the weld metal. In order to achieve this effect, Nb is preferably added to a content of 0.001% or more. Nb content exceeding 0.040%, however, reduces toughness. Hence, the Nb content is preferably set to 0.040% or less.

(76) The weld joint of this disclosure is preferably produced in accordance with the method of production described below.

(77) Specifically, molten steel adjusted to have the aforementioned chemical composition is prepared by steelmaking with an ordinary method using a converter, an electric heating furnace, a vacuum melting furnace, or the like. Next, after forming the molten steel into a slab by continuous casting, the slab is hot rolled to a desired plate thickness. The result is then cooled, and tempering is additionally performed, yielding a steel plate with a thickness of 30 mm or greater.

(78) During the hot rolling, the slab reheating temperature and rolling reduction are preferably specified. Specifically, in order to provide the base metal with high strength and good toughness, the slab reheating temperature is preferably set to be from 1000 C. to 1200 C., and the overall rolling reduction is preferably set to be 50% or greater.

(79) Taking steel plates obtained in this way as base metal, weld metal adjusted to the aforementioned chemical composition is used to produce a weld joint. At this time, when the thickness of the steel plates is 40 mm or less, an X-shaped groove is formed in the steel plates, and both-side single-layer submerged arc welding is performed. When the thickness of the steel plates exceeds 40 mm, an X-shaped or V-shaped groove is formed in the steel plates, and multilayer fill submerged arc welding is performed.

(80) In other words, both-side single-layer submerged arc welding is only used in the case of thin material with a plate thickness of 40 mm or less. Multilayer fill submerged arc welding can be performed with a heat input of 80 kJ/cm or more. If both-side single-layer welding is performed when the plate thickness exceeds 40 mm, the heat input greatly exceeds 100 kJ/cm, which may prevent the properties of the weld zone from being maintained. By contrast, multilayer fill welding can be performed with an approximate upper limit of 100 kJ/cm.

EXAMPLES

(81) Steels having the respective chemical compositions shown in Table 1 were each obtained by steelmaking, and steel plates with a thickness of 30 mm to 100 mm were produced. The base metal was evaluated by a tensile test in which JIS No. 4 test pieces were collected from the 1/2 position along the thickness of the steel plates, so that the longitudinal direction of each test piece was perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel plate. The yield stress (YS) and tensile strength (TS) were then measured in accordance with JIS Z 2241.

(82) A Charpy impact test was also performed by collecting JIS V-notch test pieces from the 1/2 position along the thickness of the steel plates, so that the longitudinal direction of each test piece was perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel plate. The absorbed energy vE-40 C. at 40 C. was then measured.

(83) The base metal properties were evaluated as being good when all of the following relationships were satisfied: YS355 MPa, TS470 MPa, and vE-40 C.200 J.

(84) As the weld joint, a multilayer fill weld joint was produced by submerged arc welding. The welding was performed with a heat input of 100 kJ/cm.

(85) The toughness was evaluated by measuring the absorbed energy vE-40 C. at 40 C. with a Charpy impact test, using the weld metal center and the weld bond at the 1/4 position along the thickness of the steel plates as the notch position for the test.

(86) Regarding weld properties, the toughness of the weld joint was determined to be good when the mean for three tests satisfied the relationship vE-40 C.150 J.

(87) Using the weld metal center and the weld bond as the notch position for the CTOD test pieces, the CTOD value at 10 C., i.e. 10 C., was measured. The CTOD property of the weld joint was determined to be good when the minimum of the CTOD value (10 C.) over three tests was 0.50 mm or greater.

(88) Table 2 lists the chemical composition of the weld metal and the results of the Charpy impact test and CTOD test on the weld joint.

(89) Regarding the chemical composition of the base metal, steel numbers 1 to 5 are Examples, whereas steel numbers 6 to 24 are Comparative Examples for which one or more of the contents in the chemical composition and the values of the formulas are outside of the ranges of this disclosure.

(90) In Table 2, weld codes A, B, D, E, H, I, J, and M are all Examples for which the results of the Charpy impact test on the weld bond and the results of the three-point bending CTOD test on the weld bond satisfied the targets.

(91) By contrast, for weld codes C, F, G, K, and N to S, the steel plate chemical composition and/or the weld metal chemical composition were outside of the ranges of this disclosure, and the base metal properties or the results of the Charpy impact test on the weld bond and the results of the three-point bending CTOD test on the weld bond did not satisfy the targets.

(92) From the results in Tables 1 and 2, it is clear that in a steel plate according to this disclosure, the yield stress (YS) of the base metal is 355 MPa or greater, the Charpy absorption energy (vE-40 C.) is 200 J or greater, and both the strength and toughness of the base metal are excellent. Furthermore, regarding the weld metal of the weld joint and the bond, vE-40 C. is 150 J or greater, the CTOD value is 0.5 mm or greater, and the toughness of the heat-affected zone is excellent. By contrast, in all of the results for the Comparative Examples that fell outside of the ranges of this disclosure, at least one of the above properties degraded.

(93) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Steel No. C Si Mn P S Al Ni Mo Nb Ti B N Ca 1 0.041 0.10 1.74 0.006 0.0012 0.029 0.22 0.06 0.017 0.009 0.0002 0.0034 0.0018 2 0.064 0.16 1.53 0.006 0.0013 0.037 0.11 0.07 0.019 0.011 0.0001 0.0035 0.0021 3 0.063 0.22 1.41 0.002 0.0021 0.029 0.07 0.008 0.012 0.0002 0.0038 0.0025 4 0.045 0.18 1.78 0.004 0.0027 0.023 0.25 0.07 0.019 0.009 0.0001 0.0026 0.0027 5 0.074 0.15 1.61 0.006 0.0016 0.023 0.18 0.07 0.013 0.012 0.0002 0.0037 0.0020 6 0.121 0.23 1.62 0.005 0.0010 0.023 0.06 0.008 0.010 0.0001 0.0029 0.0023 7 0.087 0.47 1.45 0.004 0.0011 0.035 0.07 0.013 0.009 0.0001 0.0036 0.0011 8 0.080 0.17 1.18 0.003 0.0013 0.036 0.006 0.013 0.0001 0.0033 0.0018 9 0.047 0.06 2.41 0.005 0.0023 0.039 0.28 0.011 0.011 0.0002 0.0025 0.0010 12 0.077 0.24 1.63 0.002 0.0025 0.026 0.25 0.07 0.020 0.012 0.0012 0.0036 0.0012 13 0.032 0.23 1.57 0.005 0.0025 0.040 0.18 0.06 0.019 0.011 0.0001 0.0029 0.0027 14 0.059 0.08 1.47 0.004 0.0013 0.019 0.06 0.051 0.008 0.0001 0.0036 0.0029 15 0.058 0.13 1.63 0.002 0.0016 0.018 0.07 0.019 0.039 0.0002 0.0035 0.0020 16 0.063 0.13 1.65 0.006 0.0024 0.027 0.08 0.018 0.012 0.0001 0.0075 0.0024 17 0.058 0.20 1.53 0.004 0.0012 0.015 0.05 0.08 0.009 0.008 0.0001 0.0027 0.0026 18 0.037 0.16 1.52 0.006 0.0022 0.015 0.25 0.88 0.022 0.010 0.0001 0.0029 0.0018 19 0.051 0.21 1.66 0.002 0.0020 0.013 0.17 0.07 0.022 0.013 0.0001 0.0036 0.0015 20 0.086 0.20 1.49 0.005 0.0007 0.012 0.05 0.015 0.010 0.0002 0.0031 0.0006 21 0.084 0.19 1.59 0.004 0.0012 0.021 0.06 0.021 0.007 0.0001 0.0036 0.0042 22 0.085 0.15 1.45 0.004 0.0016 0.033 0.09 0.008 0.006 0.0001 0.0048 0.0023 23 0.069 0.12 1.43 0.002 0.0011 0.041 0.29 0.014 0.018 0.0001 0.0026 0.0027 24 0.088 0.06 1.78 0.012 0.0020 0.020 0.11 0.08 0.023 0.008 0.0002 0.0037 0.0011 Plate Steel Plate Steel Plate 1/21 Steel Formula Formula Thickness Strength (MPa) Thoughness No. Cu Cr V O Ceq TiN (2) ACR (3) (mm) YS TS vE-40 C. Notes 1 0.016 0.0018 0.361 2.65 0.70 2.82 30 421 531 337 Conforming Steel 2 0.34 0.0022 0.409 3.14 0.68 2.75 50 434 541 299 Conforming Steel 3 0.15 0.44 0.019 0.0016 0.404 3.16 0.64 2.15 75 397 517 271 Conforming Steel 4 0.0019 0.375 3.46 0.50 2.90 100 374 491 255 Conforming Steel 5 0.05 0.019 0.0022 0.376 3.24 0.52 2.68 100 368 488 263 Conforming Steel 6 0.16 0.0026 0.414 3.45 0.84 2.60 30 413 548 354 Comparative Steel 7 0.0019 0.342 2.50 0.35 2.51 50 387 478 237 Comparative Steel 8 0.32 0.0010 0.341 3.94 0.85 1.91 75 352 454 245 Comparative Steel 9 0.14 0.48 0.0018 0.573 4.40 0.15 3.20 75 412 574 147 Comparative Steel 12 0.37 0.23 0.0010 0.449 3.33 0.28 2.86 100 325 443 165 Comparative Steel 13 1.24 0.0016 0.400 3.79 0.59 2.69 75 315 457 147 Comparative Steel 14 0.0017 0.315 2.22 1.20 3.32 75 309 434 187 Comparative Steel 15 0.25 0.0015 0.360 11.14 0.67 2.74 75 368 489 246 Comparative Steel 16 0.24 0.013 0.0017 0.404 1.60 0.52 2.81 100 439 526 174 Comparative Steel 17 0.14 1.48 0.0024 0.637 2.96 0.90 2.36 100 487 567 113 Comparative Steel 18 0.38 0.0021 0.559 3.45 0.34 3.19 100 474 579 98 Comparative Steel 19 0.081 0.0024 0.370 3.61 0.24 2.86 75 397 497 125 Comparative Steel 20 0.015 0.0030 0.348 3.23 0.20 2.62 75 384 489 255 Comparative Steel 21 0.23 0.0017 0.376 1.94 1.98 2.87 100 394 507 249 Comparative Steel 22 0.0023 0.333 1.25 0.60 2.29 100 369 487 159 Comparative Steel 23 0.46 0.0026 0.419 6.92 0.96 2.44 100 417 546 137 Comparative Steel 24 0.11 0.0018 0.415 2.16 0.21 3.25 100 429 551 97 Comparative Steel Formula (1) Ceq = [C] + [Mn]/6 + ([Cu] + [Ni])/15 + ([Cr] + [Mo] + [V])/5 Formula (2) ([Ca] (0.18 + 130 [Ca]) [O])/125/[S] Formula (3) 5.5[C].sup.13 + 15[P] + 0.90[Mn] + 0.12[Ni] + 7.9[Nb].sup.12 + 0.53[Mo]

(94) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Plate Weld Steel Thickness No. No. (mm) Welding Method C Si Mn Al Ni Mo Nb A 1 30 both-side single layer 0.067 0.41 1.56 0.008 0.25 0.20 B 1 30 both-side single layer 0.055 0.35 1.45 0.012 0.40 0.31 C 1 30 both-side single layer 0.140 0.33 1.78 0.011 0.42 0.21 D 2 50 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.062 0.30 1.29 0.005 0.30 0.20 E 2 50 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.089 0.19 1.49 0.007 0.33 0.31 F 2 50 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.052 1.20 1.46 0.014 0.31 0.18 G 2 50 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.058 0.33 2.68 0.005 0.33 0.27 H 3 75 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.063 0.15 1.94 0.009 0.36 0.29 I 3 75 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.076 0.24 1.46 0.006 0.29 0.14 J 4 100 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.076 0.38 1.95 0.007 0.38 0.25 0.003 K 4 100 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.071 0.38 1.26 0.007 0.29 0.21 0.007 M 5 100 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.056 0.13 2.22 0.012 0.25 0.16 N 6 30 both-side single layer 0.074 0.31 1.52 0.009 0.35 0.18 0.004 P 7 50 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.067 0.48 1.49 0.011 0.34 0.16 Q 15 75 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.062 0.28 1.54 0.009 0.27 0.15 R 20 75 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.068 0.24 1.59 0.010 0.27 0.13 0.003 S 21 100 100 kJ/cm multilayer 0.064 0.29 1.48 0.011 0.45 0.19 Weld CTDD vE-40 (J) (10 C., mm) Weld WM WM No. Ti B Cu Cr V Center Bond Center Bond Notes A 0.012 0.0005 0.02 0.03 150 163 0.79 0.90 Example B 0.013 0.0010 0.05 187 195 0.60 0.85 Example C 0.011 0.0008 34 68 0.14 0.41 Comparative Example D 0.013 0.0007 187 163 0.61 0.99 Example E 0.008 0.0011 0.02 180 164 0.96 1.24 Example F 0.013 0.0009 0.02 0.06 0.008 54 78 0.26 0.34 Comparative Example G 0.011 0.0014 0.06 47 58 0.22 0.31 Comparative Example H 0.008 0.0006 0.11 156 152 0.97 0.78 Example I 0.008 0.0005 0.06 0.010 162 151 0.78 0.72 Example J 0.014 0.0013 0.013 182 163 0.94 1.29 Example K 0.084 0.0058 0.05 0.02 16 29 0.09 0.17 Comparative Example M 0.014 0.0007 0.10 0.007 171 169 0.97 1.63 Example N 0.013 0.0009 0.04 158 31 0.87 0.09 Comparative Example P 0.011 0.0008 0.05 0.004 157 27 0.82 0.12 Comparative Example Q 0.028 0.0007 0.04 153 36 0.58 0.26 Comparative Example R 0.016 0.0010 168 97 0.67 0.35 Comparative Example S 0.010 0.0012 0.09 171 94 0.76 0.40 Comparative Example