Method for producing electrolyte for vanadium batteries from oil sand waste

Abstract

A method for recovering Vanadium from a secondary source such as fly ash. Leaching is involved using single or combined acids such as hydrochloric and sulfuric in a temperature range of 20 C. and 100 C. The leaching is performed in sequential operations with recovery of Vanadium in the range of 92%. The recovered Vanadium can be formulated into an electrolyte for redox batteries.

Claims

1. A method of recovering a vanadium electrolyte from an ash stream containing vanadium, comprising: contacting the ash stream with an acid solution forming a mixture, wherein the acid solution comprises H.sub.2SO.sub.4 at a concentration of from 3 molar to 6 molar; wherein the mixture has a liquid to solid ratio (L/S ratio) of from 20 mlg.sup.1 to 60 mlg.sup.1; maintaining the mixture at a temperature from 20 C. to 100 C.; and separating the vanadium electrolyte from the mixture.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the acid solution comprises H.sub.2SO.sub.4 solution having a molar concentration of 3M.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the temperature is from 60 C. to 80 C.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the temperature is maintained at 80 C.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the temperature is maintained at 60 C.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the L/S ratio is 40 mlg.sup.1.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the L/S ratio is 60 mlg.sup.1.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the acid solution comprises 3 molar H.sub.2SO.sub.4 and 6 molar HCl.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the temperature is from 60 C. to 80 C.

10. The method of claim 8, further comprising incorporating the vanadium electrolyte into a redox battery.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the temperature is maintained at 80 C.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the temperature is maintained at 60 C.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein said L/S ratio is 40 mlg.sup.1.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein said L/S ratio is 60 mlg.sup.1.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising separating additional compounds from said ash stream.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the additional compounds comprise nickel compounds.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the ash stream comprises flexicoke fly ash, petcoke ash and/or asphaltene gasification/combustion plant ash.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the ash stream comprises asphaltene gasification/combustion plant ash.

19. The method of claim 1, further comprising incorporating the vanadium electrolyte into a redox battery.

20. A method for recovering a vanadium electrolyte from an ash stream containing vanadium, comprising: contacting the ash stream with an acid solution comprising H.sub.2SO.sub.4 and HCl in a molar ratio of 1:2 forming a mixture; maintaining the mixture at a temperature of from 60 C. to 80 C.; recovering the vanadium electrolyte from the mixture; wherein the ash stream is obtained from an asphaltene gasification/combustion plant, oil sands and/or coal power plants.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the H.sub.2SO.sub.4 is at a concentration of 3M and the HCl is at a concentration of 6M.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the mixture comprises a liquid to solid ratio (L/S ratio) of from 20 mlg.sup.1 to 60 mlg.sup.1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of one embodiment of the present invention;

(2) FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the percentage of Vanadium recovered as a function of the liquid to solid ratio for different acids at 80 C.;

(3) FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the percentage of Vanadium recovered as a function of the liquid to solid ratio for different Molarities of H.sub.2SO.sub.4;

(4) FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the Vanadium recovered as a function of temperature;

(5) FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the Vanadium recovered as a function of temperature at 20 C., 60 C. and 80 C.; and

(6) FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the percentage of Vanadium recovered as a function of H.sub.2SO.sub.4 concentration;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(7) The secondary source of vanadium being leveraged in this technology is, for example: Fly/bottom ash from asphaltene gasification/combustion plant (SAGD producers i.e. Nexen, MEG energy, NWR); Petcoke ash (from oil sands/mining: Suncor, Syncrude); Coal ash (from coal power plants)

(8) The Alberta Oil Sands industry is currently facing several challenges such as lowering oil price, strong competition from conventional oil production countries, environmental awareness and a social factor (employment market). Nevertheless, development of oil sands is a complex and energy/capital-intensive process. Oil sands waste management costs account for 15-30% of OPEX giving a cost of from 1.5-3 CAN$ per barrel of oil production. By considering the production projection in 2020, around 2.5-3 million barrels a day in Alberta, more efforts should be made to decrease the production cost and to diversify the mix of products. To utilize the first source of secondary vanadium listed above (i.e. Fly/bottom ash from asphaltene gasification/combustion). Currently all of the hazardous solid waste from production of oil sands is landfilled in Alberta. Metal extraction technology for mining (high TRL) has been used worldwide for more than 100 years. Recovering technologies for ash and used catalyst utilization have also been applied for more than 30 years around the world. In Alberta, the ash from industrial plants is considered as a high quality ash with regards to the high concentration of Va and Ni. Applying technologies to recover such high quality source of vanadium (and nickel) and to produce vanadium electrolyte ready to be used in vanadium redox batteries, is the innovative picture, that the instant brings as part of the solution to renewable energy storage. Generally, the technology is based on few multi-phase separation steps under controlled operations conditions (temperature, pH, pressure, concentration, etc.).

(9) Extremely large capacities make vanadium redox batteries (VRBs) well suited to use in large power storage applications having an extremely rapid discharge capabilityideal for use in wind or solar energy storage. Vanadium demand in VRB applications conservatively projected to grow, worldwide, from 1,100 tones in 2012 to 8,500 tones in 2017.

(10) Lithium vanadium phosphate batteries, on the other hand, produce higher voltages and improved energy for weight characteristics ideal for use in electric cars. Vanadium demand in lithium batteries is conservatively expected to grow from 200 tones in 2012 to 1,700 tones in 2017. Actual growth in demand for vanadium in energy storage applications could be significantly higher than these conservative projections over the next few years.

(11) The technology set forth herein, when practiced for a vanadium recovery process, will produce very high demand products in energy storage current and future market. The technology requires less energy intensive process (compared to conventional vanadium extraction processes) with no waste stream out of the process. the design is closed loop; which means 2nd generation hazardous waste come to our process as feed and three product streams will be produced: Vanadium electrolyte, Nickel hydroxide and carbon (Nickel and carbon will be used in the anode production of VRB).

(12) World Energy Outlook expects total renewables used in the electric power sector to increase by 8.7% in 2016 and by 6.5% in 2017. Forecast hydropower generation in the electric power sector increases by 5.4% in 2016 and by 2.8% in 2017. Renewables other than hydropower are projected to grow by 11.5% in 2016 and by 9.5% in 2017. Solar generation from both PV and solar thermal is projected to average 130 gigawatt hours per day (GWh/d) in 2017, an increase of 40% from the 2016 level as much of the new capacity comes online at the end of 2016. Forecast utility-scale solar power generation averages 1.1% of total U.S. electricity generation in 2017. The rapid growth in variable renewable energy, namely solar PV and wind, is catalyzing efforts to modernize the electricity system. At high levels of penetration, variable renewable energy increases the need for resources that contribute to system flexibility. This ensures that system stability is maintained by matching supply and demand of electricity. Battery storage is one of the options for enhancing system flexibility in these circumstances by managing electricity supply fluctuations.

(13) Government support has been a key driver for demonstration battery storage projects all over the world, and have built a productive foundation of operational knowledge, data and industry participation. USA, China, Japan and Germany are leading the implementation of battery storage. Other countries, including Italy and South Korea, are following close behind. It is clear that increased variable renewable energy is one key driver everywhere as countries seek to improve system flexibility, maximize renewable resource feed-in and develop alternative technologies.

(14) Vanadium and vanadium based products, are amongst key enablers for maximizing renewable energy integration into energy mix. Large companies make vanadium redox batteries (VRBs) well suited to use in large power storage applications having an extremely rapid discharge capability, ideal for use in wind or solar energy storage. Vanadium demand in VRB applications conservatively projected to grow, worldwide, from 1,100 tones in 2012 to 8,500 tones in 2017. Vanadium is also used in lithium batteries. Lithium vanadium phosphate batteries are used for greening transportation, as these batteries produce higher voltages and improved energy for weight characteristics ideal for use in electric cars. Vanadium demand in these lithium batteries is expected to grow from 200 tones in 2012 to 1,700 tones in 2017. Actual growth in demand for vanadium in energy storage applications could be significantly higher than these conservative projections over the next few years.

(15) Though initial market for vanadium in batteries, is supplied via primary sources (i.e. vanadium mining), oil sands waste in Alberta can potentially be a significant secondary source which can be integrated into market suppliers for this product. Market analysis shows, the market for battery storage technologies has developed rapidly over the last couple of years and is anticipated to grow. Previously, the market for power sector battery storage was dominated by sodium-sulphur batteries made by NGK Insulators in Japan. This has shifted recently towards lithium-ion chemistries due to current cost, performance and safety advantages over other battery types. The shift has been incentivized by governmental support and the influence of other sectors.

(16) The overall market is set to expand dramatically in the coming decade. A variety of battery types and designs will remain active in various niches of the field. While lithium ion is a popular battery at present, advanced lead acid, flow batteries and less developed batteries have also made significant progress. A healthy diversity of options such as vanadium redox batteries will remain given the versatility of battery technology in a variety of applications.

(17) Vanadium has broad applications in various fields, including as an alloying elements in steelmaking. The annual vanadium production for steelmaking industry was approximately 60,000 tons in 2008, with about 5% yearly increase in vanadium consumption due to demand in further development in high strength low alloy steel. Although the primary source for vanadium recovery is mining and mainly from S. Africa, China and Russia, for a comprehensive valorization of industrial resources, it would be more beneficial to develop a processing route to utilize valuables such as vanadium from waste streams. So far, no prior initiative is found in the combined waste processing technology for vanadium electrolyte production. The closest approach relevant to the method set herein is a research study from Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, which is focused on direct FeV production from power plant fly ash for steelmaking industry.

(18) Fly/Bottom ash generated in gasification of asphaltene in oil sands plants, (as well as other ash streams generated in coal power plants), is a solid residue which is a valuable source of vanadium and nickel. Stricter environmental regulations for landfilling of ash waste from one side, and increased market potential and sustainable material utilization demand high vanadium recovery and safer treatment. Several processes are available, and reported in the literature for extracting vanadium from primary source (mining) and from waste ash streams in petroleum and heavy oil residues. The effort is, however, mainly focused on selective leaching of vanadium and then roasting to vanadium pentoxide.

(19) Referring now to FIG. 1, shown is a schematic drawing of one possible method in general overview.

(20) Numeral 10, denotes the overall method. Initially, the feedstock 12, shown in the example as ash is exposed to a first leaching operation 14. The ash 12 contains the metal values, namely vanadium and nickel for recovery. From the first leaching operation 14, a quantity of vanadium electrolyte is recovered, denoted by numeral 16 leaving a first processed solution 18. Solution 18 is exposed to a second leaching operation 20 in order to recover nickel hydroxide 22. This leaves a second processed solution 24 which is then passed onto a third stage where carbon black 26 is removed from the system and water is recycled as denoted by numeral 28. From the leaching operation 20, processing chemicals are recycled at 32.

(21) As an option, depending on the desired outcome from practicing the method, the second processed solution 2 may be retreated in the first leaching operation 14 subsequent to the removal of the vanadium electrolyte to recover any residual vanadium electrolyte. This possibility is illustrated in the Figure by circuit 34. The result of this unit operation is a third processed solution which may then be retreated in the second leaching operation 20 to recover any residual nickel hydroxide.

(22) Further still, the method may be repeated in its entirety either with or without removal of the vanadium electrolyte 16 and nickel hydroxide 22.

(23) As a further option to enhance the recovery process, a suitable chelating agent 40 may be added along with the initial feedstock 12 or subsequent to any or all of the operations described supra.

(24) The leaching operations 14 and 20 comprise leaching operations, similar to those documented. As noted in the preliminary statements in the background, making use of the secondary source for the feedstock has a substantial impact on concentration possibilities for the vanadium, but further circumvents the exorbitant cost associated with using mined compounds. It is noted herein that the feedstock characterized in this method is typically discarded for landfill. The underlying positive economics of this point are clear owing to the fact that the carbon black and nickel hydroxide are saleable commodities.

(25) Depending on the result, the vanadium electrolyte 16 and nickel hydroxide 22 may be further treated to a purification operation 46, 48, respectively. Further enhancements include the provision of an additive addition 50. Suitable additives will be apparent to those skilled, however an example is an agglomerating agent. The carbon recovery may also include a purification operation.

(26) Turning to the battery facet of this technology, the vanadium electrolyte can be used in a battery for use as a power source. The battery and electrolyte are not shown, since these things are well documented in the art.

(27) In greater detail, the optimum operating conditions will now be discussed. FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of Vanadium recovery as a function of the liquid solid ratio for different acids, namely sulfuric and hydrochloric acids at a temperature of 80 C. From the data, it is established that good Vanadium recovery is achievable with an L/S ratio of from 20 mlg.sup.1 to 60 mlg.sup.1, and that using 3 Molar sulfuric acid with an L/S ratio of 60 mlg.sup.1 results in 92% recovery, 6 Molar sulfuric acid and a mixed acid of sulfuric and hydrochloric of 3 Molar and 6 Molar, respectively with recovery of greater than 80% recovery.

(28) Referring now to FIG. 3, similar results are shown to those in FIG. 2, isolating the 3 Molar and 6 Molar sulfuric acid. This illustrates that increasing sulfuric acid concentration results in lower Vanadium recovery.

(29) FIG. 4 depicts data regarding the temperature effect on Vanadium recovery. For a 3 Molar solution, the data illustrates that a range of between 60 C. and 80 C. at an L/S ratio of 40 mlg.sup.1 provides good recovery. FIG. 5, confirms that a suitable temperature range is between 20 C. and 100 C. for the recovery of Vanadium.

(30) FIG. 6 illustrates Vanadium recovery as a function of sulfuric acid concentration at a temperature of 60 C. and L/S of 40 mlg.sup.1. As shown, a suitable range for Vanadium recovery is between 0.7 Molar and 3 Molar sulfuric acid.

(31) In summary, the technology delineated herein results in an elegant recovery of metal values from a secondary source with the concomitant beneficial economics, a highly efficient vanadium electrolyte and use of the electrolyte in a redox battery.