Method of magnetic resonance with excitation by a prewinding pulse
10281548 ยท 2019-05-07
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01R33/561
PHYSICS
G01R33/50
PHYSICS
International classification
G01R33/561
PHYSICS
G01R33/50
PHYSICS
Abstract
A method of magnetic resonance, in which a sample introduced in a measurement volume in an external magnetic field is excited by an excitation pulse and the signal formed by the transverse magnetization thus produced is read out by a receiving coil. The method is characterized in that a prewinding pulse is used as the excitation pulse, which prewinding pulse is characterized in that the formed transverse magnetization M.sub.() of spins of different Larmor frequency after the pulse has a phase .sub.0(), wherein .sub.0() as a function of within a predefined frequency range has an approximately linear course having negative slope, such that the spins refocus after an echo time defined by the pulse without an additional refocusing pulse being necessary.
Claims
1. A method of magnetic resonance for examination of a sample introduced into a measurement volume within an external magnetic field, the method comprising the steps of: a) exciting the sample using an excitation pulse, wherein the excitation pulse is a prewinding pulse generating a transverse magnetization M.sub.() of spins of different Larmor frequency after the excitation pulse, the transverse magnetization having a phase .sub.0(), wherein .sub.0(), as a function of within a predefined frequency range , has an approximately linear course with negative slope, such that spins refocus to form a spin echo after an end of the excitation pulse at an echo time, wherein the echo time is defined by the excitation pulse and is larger than the duration of the excitation pulse, with no additional refocusing pulse or refocusing gradient thereby being necessary; and b) reading out, after a time interval and using a receiving coil, a signal formed by the transverse magnetization produced in step a).
2. The method of claim 1, wherein a time profile of an amplitude and a phase of the prewinding pulse is calculated by solving Bloch equations inversely and the prewinding pulse is produced accordingly.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the prewinding pulse is calculated using a Shinnar-Le Roux method.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the prewinding pulse is calculated by an optimal control method.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal is read out spatially encoded in 1, 2, or 3 dimensions by means of time-variable magnetic field gradients, wherein a spatial encoding is performed using at least one of a conventional method, Fourier encoding, radial imaging and spiral imaging.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal is read out after a delay, thereby undergoing a defined, freely selectable T2*-dependent modulation of amplitude and/or phase.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein a produced signal is refocused and read out one or more times at incremental readout times using single or multiple gradient inversion.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein a produced signal is refocused and read out one or more times at incremental readout times using single or multiple gradient inversion.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the prewinding pulse is applied under a slice selection gradient of strength Amp, wherein the slice selection gradient is switched off after an end of the prewinding pulse and in such a manner that a time integral under the gradient corresponds to an action integral Amp*TE required for self-refocusing.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein a formed signal is read out under a readout gradient GR.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein both the prewinding pulse and the signal occur under a spatially encoded gradient GR.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein repetition of acquisition is carried out in a spatial direction other than 2 or 3-dimensional radial spatial encoding.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein repetition of acquisition is performed with different phase encoding steps between excitation and data readout.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein the prewinding pulse is switched under a time-variable gradient.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the prewinding pulse is used under a time-variable gradient according to a VERSE method.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the excitation pulse is chosen to initially take the magnetization to flip angles defined by .sub.z<(t)<n.sub.z.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the excitation pulse is chosen such that, with a limited maximum pulse amplitude, Rmax()<Rmax(90) is achieved with a negative sign.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the excitation pulse is chosen to have a constant amplitude and one or more phase jumps.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein an amplitude of the excitation pulse is shaped and changes sign at one or more points.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
(1) The figures show:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
(29) As already mentioned above, the inventive method is based on the concept of a spin echo formation without a refocusing pulse, which is achieved by using a special excitation pulse, which produces dephasing of negative slope with respect to the frequency (d.sub.0/d<0) over a desired frequency range . After excitation with such a pulse, rephasing of the spins is performed with free precession and, without a refocusing pulse, a spin echo is formed at the echo time TE=d.sub.0/d, which is thus defined by the pulse.
(30) This principle of the invention is outlined in
(31) Such a pulse designated phase pre-winding pulse can be generated by solving the Bloch equation for the stated conditions, wherein in the following consideration, T1 and T2 relaxation are ignored and only the free precession of the magnetization in the presence of the static magnetic field inhomogeneities and the effects caused by the time-variable B.sub.1 field of the excitation pulse are considered:
(32) In the so-called small-angle approximation, the non-linear Bloch equation can be linearized. In this approximation, a Fourier relation exists between the pulse and its frequency response. If the relaxed magnetization {right arrow over (M)}.sub.0=(0,0,1).sup.T is assumed before the pulse, the following results for complex transverse magnetization M.sub.=M.sub.x+iM.sub.y after the pulse
{right arrow over (M)}.sub.=E.Math.{right arrow over (x)}.(4)
(33) The vector {right arrow over (M)}.sub. has the elements M.sub.,k=|M.sub.|.Math.exp(i.sub.kTE), E is a matrix with the elements E.sub.k,n=exp(i.sub.knt) and {right arrow over (x)} describes the sought pulse. .sub.k extends in sufficiently small steps to satisfy the Nyquist criterion over the frequency range , in which the pulse is to achieve the desired effect. The absolute value of the transverse magnetization results from the desired flip angle |M.sub.|=sin(). The so-called dwell time t describes the digital sampling rate of the variable B.sub.1 field so that the pulse {right arrow over (x)} has length n.Math.t. Because E is generally not quadratic and is ill-conditioned, a regularized Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse is used to provide the solution.
{right arrow over (x)}=E.sup.H(EE.sup.H+.sup.21).sup.1{right arrow over (M)}.sub..(5)
(34) The Tikhonov regularization used here minimizes the irradiated energy of the B.sub.1 field. The regularization parameter trades the accuracy of the inversion off against minimization of the energy of the B.sub.1 field.
(35) The solution obtained in this way can be used either directly as a pulse in linear approximation, or be applied to the non-linear Block equation by means of the Shinnar-Le Roux method to solve the equation exactly (see reference [9]).
(36) Alternately, it is possible to calculate inventive pulses by means of the Optimal Control method (see reference [3]). The pulse is represented as a control that is optimized to minimize a cost function.
(37) The desired frequency response can optionally be exactly satisfied, or the distance from the desired frequency response can be minimized. Satisfying the Bloch equation is ensured by a Lagrange multiplier. The Bloch equation is therefore also exactly satisfied in the optimal control method.
(38)
(39) In the frequency response in
(40) A preferred group of applications of the inventive method is shown in
(41) In a preferred implementation of this method, &is chosen such that it covers the entire range of the variation of the Larmor frequency of the nuclear spins caused by field inhomogeneities in the volume to be imaged. Unlike conventional gradient echo methods in which the formed signal is phase- and amplitude-modulated by T2* decay caused by inhomogeneities, with use of Pprew, the formed signal is refocused with respect to the field inhomogeneities. Such an implementation is especially suitable for examination of inhomogeneous samples without T2* signal loss.
(42) By analogy with the methods shown, many of the other methods known from the literature for spatial encoding (e.g. radial imaging, spiral imaging, and others) can be combined with the inventive prewinding pulse.
(43) The instant of spontaneous refocusing TE does not necessarily have to match the gradient echo instant caused by inversion of the readout gradient (
(44) In a further preferred implementation of the methods shown in
(45) A further group of preferred applications is shown in
(46)
(47) With linear decline of GSshown in
(48) Such an implementation is especially advantageous for achieving very short echo times TE. In a magnetic resonance tomograph, a certain dead time between the end of the RF pulse and the beginning of data readout is generally necessary due to the technical characteristics of the coils and receiving electronics. The dead time is typically in the range of a few microseconds to approx. 100 s. Even if extremely short, hard pulses are used, with subsequent readout of the formed signal as free induction decay (FID), the instant of signal coherence (=start of the FID) is not read out, which results in T2*-dependent signal attenuation. Moreover, the spectrum formed by Fourier transformation of an incomplete FID exhibits a complex, frequency-dependent phase that is difficult to correct.
(49) Due to use of a prewinding pulse, the FID can be read out completely. This permits spectroscopic measurements with very short echo times TE.
(50)
(51)
(52) Moreover, GR can be left constant in one direction. In this case, a slice is excited whose thickness results from and the gradient strength. The two remaining spatial directions can be encoded with phase encoding between excitation and data readout (
(53) The previous description was limited to discussion of the possibilities of prewinding pulses with reference to the characteristic feature of the negative slope of the phase course in the range . Methods are described below that are concerned with controlled modulation of the frequency ranges outside .
(54) As shown in
(55) With use of small-angle approximation (linear approximation of the Bloch equation)as in the examples shownthe duration of the pulse is directly correlated with the slope d.sub.0/d in the range due to the properties of the Fourier transformation. Pulses with short duration and large negative slope d.sub.0/d can be generated with the non-linear methods (optimal control, etc.) already mentioned.
(56) It should also be pointed out that, in those methods in which the prewinding pulse is used below a spatial encoding gradient (
(57) A further preferred implementation of an inventive pulse will first be explained by means of a generic pulse that is composed of two hard pulses. The transition to more practical pulses will then be illustrated, including an estimation of the possibilities and limits of inventive pulses.
(58) A generic pulse consists of the sequence of 2 radio-frequency pulses RF.sub.1 and RF.sub.2 with flip angle .sub.1 and .sub.2 and negligible length, these having a distance tp (
(59) Initially, case 1 is considered with .sub.1=90 and .sub.2=90 with negligible length of the single pulses. As shown in
(60) The further development of the magnetization is considered in the transverse plane.
(61) From this illustration, it is immediately clear that TE depends exclusively on and not on the pulse duration.
(62)
(63)
(64) The range of weak dephasing that is relevant for the inventive method is shown magnified in
(65)
(66)
(67) The illustration shown so far permits an intuitive understanding but is not necessarily an optimum implementation. As shown in
(68) For a given =2 and a desired echo time TE, the flip angle .sub.2 that is optimal for the specific application can be calculated in this way.
(69) In the previous consideration, the pulses were assumed to be delta pulses. In practical implementation, this is impossible. An efficient implementation is achieved with a pulse with constant amplitude and a total length 2*tp, at which .sub.1=.sub.2=90 applies, so that the phase pulse is shifted by 180 in the middle of the pulse. Such a pulse is depicted in
(70) Of course, other flip angles can be chosen for both of the pulse parts.
(71) Because, for the inventive implementation, tp<<2/ is chosen, the bandwidth of the selected pulses is sufficiently large so that the calculations derived from the hard pulse approximation and shown in
(72) The previous calculations refer to the case of magnetization that is constant in the range =.sub.0+; such a case can, for example, be achieved by applying a constant gradient over a homogeneously filled vessel.
(73) If the distribution of the isochromates arises due to local field inhomogeneities, this is generally not satisfied; for stochastic local field changes, a Cauchy distribution of the isochromates is frequently assumed. This changes the numeric values of the calculations shown, but the line of argument is still valid in qualitative terms. By determination of TE for given parameters tp, .sub.1, and .sub.2, a measure of the type of microscopic field distribution can be found.
(74) In an analogous way to the hard pulse combination 90-(100, the pulse from
(75)
(76) Therein, .sub.0, denotes the phase at the end of the pulse. If R>0, this means that all isochromates are in phase after the excitation. If R<0, a spin echo is formed at instant TE=R.Math.tp. In the regime of the Hahn echo, R=1 always applies for delta pulses and R>1 always applies for real pulses.
(77) The principle of the inventive pulses can generally be described by the fact that the magnetization is not directly taken to the desired target flip angle .sub.z, but to flip angles (t), which are defined by .sub.z<(t)<n.sub.z. At these flip angles, the spins dephase. As shown below, the dephasing can be strengthened by the transition to smaller flip angles .sub.z. If the magnetization ramp d/d is inverted, a spin echo arises at the end of the pulse. The echo time is not limited by a lower limit because complete dephasing is not a precondition for it (cf. Hahn echoes). As is shown below, the echo time (measured as of the end of the pulse) is also not limited to TE<T.sub.P if the target flip angle .sub.z/2 is selected. T.sub.P describes the length of the pulse.
(78) To estimate the possible echo times, the on-resonant spin isochromate in the rotating reference system at .sub.0=0 and a further isochromate with frequency on the Bloch sphere with radius 1 are considered. For geometrical considerations, B.sub.1 fields of any strength must be able to take effect. The flip angle can therefore be changed at any rate. However, all B.sub.1 fields act on all isochromates. A distance between isochromates as defined by the Euclidean norm can therefore only be achieved by precession of the spins as a consequence of their different Larmor frequencies and can therefore only be indirectly influenced.
(79) In spherical coordinates, the position of each isochromate on the Bloch sphere can be described by the flip angle and the phase .
(80) Irrespective of the flip angle, the two isochromates are separated after an infinitesimal time step dt by the phase
d=.Math.dt.
(81) Through a change to the Cartesian coordinate system, the distance between the two isochromates in the Euclidean norm is described by
d=.Math.dt sin
where describes the flip angle at which d was produced. By derivation, it can be shown that the greatest change in the distance d is achieved at .sub.max=/2. In this case, the following applies
d.sub.max=.Math.dt.
(82) If the magnetization is now folded toward the target flip angle .sub.z/2 and the Euclidean distance between the two isochromates is again described in spherical coordinates, the maximum achievable phase difference yields
(83)
(84) This calculation has been set up for infinitesimally small times of free precession. It retains its validity as long as <<sin , is satisfied. It must be understood as the upper limit for finite times and larger produced phase differences. The sign of the phase is irrelevant because, in this theoretical estimation, any speed of rotation of the magnetization is permitted and the sign can be changed at any rate. In the description above, delta-shaped pulses, separate from a time of free precession are assumed. This does not entail any loss in generality, because any pulse in a limit value consideration can be seen as a concatenation of infinitesimally small delta-shaped pulses followed by an infinitesimally small time of free precession.
(85) Because of this geometrical estimation, it can be seen that, for .sub.z=/2, no more than |R|=1 can be achieved. However, for smaller flip angles larger values are also possible, i.e. a pulse of length T.sub.P can generate a phase ramp that generates a spin echo after a time TE>T.sub.P after the end of the pulse. However, the estimation only applies to nn2 , and not therefore to the pulses in
(86) Inventive pulses make use of the described effect by initially taking the magnetization to flip angles close to /2, where a large Euclidean distance quickly arises between the isochromates. The magnetization is then taken to the target flip angle .sub.z, which is further from /2. This results in phase ramp d/d with a large absolute value. This concept is illustrated in
(87) To achieve complete rephasing of all spins with R=1 with a flip angle of .sub.z=/2, magnetization must first be excited around /2 and then refocused with a pulse. Overall, therefore, a total rotation of 3/2 is required. With very short total pulse lengths and limited B.sub.1 amplitude, this total rotation can no longer be achieved. In limiting cases, in which the required rotation can just about be performed, the individual excitation and refocusing components are so long that R>>1 results. By choosing flip angle .sub.z/2, inventive pulses make it possible to break through these limits with finite B.sub.1 fields and to achieve longer echo times than were previously possible in prior art.
(88) A flip angle that is as constant as possible over the entire relevant frequency spectrum and simultaneous refocusing of all spins is usually desired. These conditions are only very poorly met by the generic pulses described so far. However, the principle can easily be applied to shaped pulses, which are optimized with respect to constant flip angle and linear phase course. By way of example,
LIST OF REFERENCES
(89) [1] Bloom, A. L., 1955. Nuclear Induction in Inhomogeneous Fields. Physical Review 98, 1105-1111. [2] Conolly, S., Nishimura, D., Macovski, A., 1986. Optimal control solutions to the magnetic resonance selective excitation problem. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 5, 106-115. [3] Conolly, S., Nishimura, D., Macovski, A., Glover, G., 1988. Variable-rate selective excitation. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 78, 440-458. [4] Glover, G. H., 1991. Multipoint dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1, 521-530. [5] Hahn, E. L., Maxwell, D. E., 1952. Spin echo measurements of nuclear spin coupling in molecules. Physical Review 88, 1070. [6] Hennig, J., Nauerth, A., Friedburg, H., 1986. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 3, 823-833. [7] Kiliptari, I. G., Tsifrinovich, V. I., 1998. Single-pulse nuclear spin echo in magnets. Physical Review B 57, 11554-11564. [7a] K. O. Lim, J. Pauly, P. Webb, R. Hurd, A. Macowski, Short TE Phosphorus spectroscopy using a spin-echo pulse, MRM 32, 98-103 (1994). [7b] P. Balchandani, M. Yamada, J. Pauly, P. Yang, D. Spielman, MRM 62, 183 (2009). [7c] X. Wu, P. Xu, R. Freeman, Delayed Focus Pulses for MRI: An evolutionary Approach Mag. Res. in Med. vol. 20 pp. 165-170 (1991). [7d] J. Shen, Delayed-focus pulses optimized using simulated annealing, J. Magn. Reson. 149, 234-238 (2001). [8] Meyer, C. H., Pauly, J. M., Macovskiand, A., Nishimura, D. G., 1990. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 15, 287-304. [9] Pauly, J., Le Roux, P., Nishimura, D., Macovski, A., 1991. Parameter relations for the Shinnar-Le Roux selective excitation pulse design algorithm [NMR imaging]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 10, 53-65. [10] Posse, S., Dager, S. R., Richards, T. L., Yuan, C., Ogg, R., Artru, A. A., Mller-Gartner, H.-W., Hayes, C., 1997. In vivo measurement of regional brain metabolic response to hyperventilation using magnetic resonance: Proton echo planar spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 37, 858-865. [11] Prieto, C., Uribe, S., Razavi, R., Atkinson, D., Schaeffter, T., 2010. 3D undersampled golden-radial phase encoding for DCE-MRA using inherently regularized iterative SENSE. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 64, 514-526. [12] Reeder, S. B., McKenzie, C. A., Pineda, A. R., Yu, H., Shimakawa, A., Brau, A. C., Hargreaves, B. A., Gold, G. E., Brittain, J. H., 2007. Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 25, 644-652. [13] Scheffler, K., Hennig, J., 1998. Reduced circular field-of-view imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 40, 474-480. [14] U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,828 B2 [15] US 2005/0127911 A1