High pressure bioreactor
10280393 ยท 2019-05-07
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C12M29/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12M27/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C12M1/34
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present invention relates generally to an integrated system, apparatus and method that allows for the continuous culturing of microorganisms under high pressure conditions and at a wide range of temperatures. More specifically, the system is configured to be gas tight and operate under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. The system is also configured to permit periodic sampling of the incubated organisms under such conditions with minimal physical/chemical disturbance inside the reactor and minimal impacts of shear forces on the collected biomass.
Claims
1. A high pressure bioreactor for the continuous culturing of microorganisms under high pressure, the bioreactor comprising: a.) a reactor vessel capable of operating under a pressure between about 5 MPa and about 150 MPa; b.) a back-pressure pressure regulator to measure and regulate the pressure of the reactor vessel; and c.) a sampler that will not affect the hydrostatic pressure of the microorganisms in the bioreactor while the reactor contents are sampled, wherein the bioreactor is gas-tight, the back-pressure regulator is connected to the reactor vessel through connecting tubing, the sampler comprises at least three valves arranged in series with connecting tubing, and one of the at least three valves arranged in series is located between the reactor vessel and the back-pressure regulator.
2. The bioreactor of claim 1 further comprising a pump and valve adapted to add media and cells to the reactor vessel in situ under pressure conditions between about 5 MPa and 150 MPa.
3. The bioreactor of claim 1 further comprising an agitator to homogenize the contents of the reactor vessel.
4. The bioreactor of claim 1 which can operate under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
5. The bioreactor of claim 1 that can function as a chemostat, retentostat or batch reactor.
6. The bioreactor of claim 1 wherein the valves and connecting tubing are prefilled with deionized water.
7. The bioreactor of claim 1 wherein the reactor vessel is cylindrical.
8. The bioreactor of claim 1, wherein the valves are micrometering valves.
9. A method to allow for the continuous culturing of microorganisms under high pressure, the method comprising: a.) providing the bioreactor according to claim 1; b.) pre-enriching media solution with dissolved gases in a reservoir; c.) filling the bioreactor with growth media at high pressure and at the optimal temperature for growth; d.) inoculating the bioreactor with culture; e.) operating the bioreactor in the batch mode while the microbial community grows in density to a desired value; f.) operating the bioreactor in a continuous mode by adding a continuous flow of media; g.) increasing the pressure up to at least about 40 MPa; and h.) monitoring the growth by sampling the reactor without affecting the hydrostatic pressure of the microbial community in bioreactor.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the reactor is sampled using the at least three valves arranged in series.
11. The method of claim 9 wherein the reservoir can withstand at least 60 psi of headspace partial pressure.
12. The method of claim 9 wherein the dissolved gases comprise one or more of H.sub.2, N.sub.2, CO.sub.2 and O.sub.2.
13. The method of claim 9 wherein the media solution is pre-heated prior to entering the bioreactor.
14. The method of claim 9 wherein the bioreactor is operated under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
15. The method of claim 9 wherein sampling does not cause cell lysis of the recovered high-pressure cultures.
16. The method of claim 9 wherein the pressure in the bioreactor is about 150 MPa.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The invention is more fully described by reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
DETAILED DISCUSSION
(12) The integrated system and method of the claimed invention allows for the culturing of microorganisms under high hydrostatic pressures (e.g., greater than about 50 MPa, 100 MPa or 150 MPa) across a wide range of temperatures (e.g., 25-500 C.). For example, in one embodiment of the invention, the bioreactor operates at a pressure of about 150 MPa and a temperature of about 25 C. In another embodiment of the invention, the bioreactor operates at a pressure of about 50 MPa and a temperature of about 500 C.
(13) The system may be operated, for example, as i) a chemostat providing continuous flow of gas-enriched media, ii) a retentostat by restricting the outflow of microorganisms from the reaction cell, or iii) a batch reactor whereby media delivery is stopped and the reactor is sealed to allow for microbial growth under a confined chemical environment. Closed system batch experiments evaluate the full cycle of microbial metabolism from initial growth to cell death, while a continuous culture flow-through approach allows for the assessment of specific relations between different metabolic pathways and microbial adaptability across a spectrum of constant anaerobic and aerobic conditions.
(14)
(15) As shown in
(16) Other unique and novel aspects of the high pressure bioreactor design include i) the direct inoculation of the bioreactor and ii) subsampling under high hydrostatic pressure. At the initial stage of the experiment, the bioreactor is filled with growth media at atmospheric pressure and at the optimal temperature for growth. Direct inoculation is commenced through one of the five inlets/outlets by injecting 2.5 ml of pre-inoculum. The bioreactor remains under batch mode while the microbial community grows in density to the desired values. Then, continuous flow starts at rates ranging from 18 nL/min to 15 mL/min. For example, flow rates of 0.020 mL/min yield residence times of nearly 4 days.
(17) Subsampling Technique:
(18) A series of micrometering valves ensure the retrieval of subsamples without affecting the hydrostatic pressure of the microbial community in the bioreactor and without subjecting the collected biomass to high shear forces (
(19) The inventor conducted a series of experiments under high hydrostatic pressure conditions. Subsamples were collected on regular time steps. These experiments illustrate the efficiency and the user-friendly nature of the integrated culturing system.
EXAMPLES
High Pressure Continuous Culturing of Extremophiles
Example 1
Thiomicrospira Thermophile (Aerobic, Mesophilic, Autotrophic)
(20) In this set of experiments, the inventor cultured the sulfur oxidizing extremophile bacteria Thiomicrospira thermophila (gram negative) which has been isolated from hydrothermal vents at East Pacific Rise, at 2500 meter depth, and has been shown to have grown with thiosulfate as the electron donor under aerobic and optimal temperature of 35 C. (60 min doubling time) (Takai et al., Thiomicrospira thermophila sp. nov., a novel microaerobic, thermotolerant, sulfur-oxidizing chemolithomixotroph isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal fumarole in the TOTO caldera, Mariana Arc, Western Pacific, IJSEM, 2004). Here, the inventor incubated T. thermophila at high hydrostatic pressures and by utilizing an autotrophic media solution enriched with O.sub.2(g). The unbuffered seawater salinity medium contained the following (L.sup.1): 25 g NaCl, 0.2 g NH.sub.4Cl, 1.23 g MgCl.6H.sub.2O, 0.4 g CaCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O. After autoclaving, the following filter-sterilized solutions were added (by volume): 10% K.sub.2HPO.sub.4 (0.25 g in 500 mL), 10 wt % NaHCO.sub.3 (2.52 g in 500 mL), 1 wt % trace metal solution SL-10, and 6 wt % Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3.5H.sub.2O (16 g in 500 mL). The trace metal solution SL-10 is made as follows (in 1L): 1.5 g FeCl.sub.2.4H.sub.2O dissolved in 10 mL 25 wt % HCl, 70 mg ZnCl.sub.2, 100 mg MnCl.sub.2.4H.sub.2O, 6 mg H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 190 mg CoCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O, 2 mg CuCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O, 24 mg NiCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O, 36 mg Na.sub.2MoO.sub.4.2H.sub.2O. The inventor evaluated the effect of pressure on the rates of metabolic growth and formation of metabolic byproducts (elemental sulfur, sulfate).
(21) Experiments were conducted in the bioreactor at 0.1, 5 and 10 MPa (1450 psi), at 35 C. The organism metabolizes through sulfur transformation reactions involving formation and subsequent oxidation of elemental sulfur (Houghton et al, Biogeochemistry of seafloor hydrothermal vent systems: an experimental study conducted at in situ conditions, PhD Thesis, 170 pp, University of Minnesota, Minn., 2013; Takai et al. 2004). The transformation of sulfur was carried on by two distinct reaction pathways that lead to the formation of elemental sulfur and SO.sub.4.sup.2:
S.sub.2O.sub.3.sup.=+O.sub.2>S.sup.0+SO.sub.4.sup.= and then
S.sup.0+O.sub.2>SO.sub.4.sup.=
Precipitation of elemental sulfur did not compromise the performance of the experimental system.
(22) During the course of the experiment, the inventor studied the growth and metabolic efficiency of T. microspira as function of the flow rate and pressure (
Example 2
Continuous Culture of M. Piezophila Under High Pressure and Varying Dilution Rates
(23) The inventor conducted a series of pilot experiments, continuously culturing aerobic/mesophilic and anaerobic/thermophilic bacteria under high hydrostatic pressure conditions. These were nearly 2-week long experiments in which, after the initial inoculation of the bioreactor, the only variables manipulated were pressure and the fluid flow rate. Subsamples were collected on regular time steps. These experiments illustrate the efficiency and the user-friendly nature of the integrated culturing system.
(24) Pilot experiments evaluating the effect of pressure on the fermentative growth of M. piezophila at an optimal temperature of growth of 65 C. (Alain et al., Marinitoga piezophila sp nov., a rod-shaped, thermo-piezophilic bacterium isolated under high hydrostatic pressure from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 52, 1331-1339, 2002) were designed to demonstrate the capabilities of the high-pressure bioreactor. At the initial stage of the experiment, the bioreactor was filled with growth medium solution at ambient pressure and heated at 65 C. Direct inoculation was commenced through the 2-1 pressure valve by injecting a 2.5 ml of pre-inoculum in the 115 ml of media in the bioreactor (
(25) The pressure manipulations imposed during this trial were performed in the following order (time interval): 0.1 MPa (24 h); 10 MPa (31.5 h); 20 MPa (38 h); 30 MPa (51 h); 40 MPa (90 h), 30 MPa (19 h); 20 MPa (23 h); 10 MPa (22.5 h) and 0.1 MPa (17.5 h). The estimated specific growth rates () under continuous medium flow were constrained by both pressure and dilution rate. Dilution rate (D), defined as the ratio between flow rate and the volume of the bioreactor (Herbert et al., The continuous culture of bacteria; a theoretical and experimental study, J Gen Microbiol, 14(3), 601-622, 1956; Fencl, Theoretical analysis of continuous culture systems, in Theoretical and Methodological Basis of Continuous Culture of Microorganisms, edited by Malek I. and Fencl Z., pp. 69-235, Academic Press, New York, 1966), ranged from 1.043 to 0.013 h.sup.1 (Table 1). The magnetic agitator operated at 70-100 rpm through the course of the experiment. Continuous culture of M. piezophila was conducted unremittingly for 352 hours (Table 1).
(26) Initial continuous culturing was performed at 2 ml/min under 0.1 MPa for 8.5 hours, with a transition to 0.16 ml/min for the last 15.5 hours before changing to 10 MPa. At this pressure, media flow remained at 0.16 ml/min and incubations lasted for 31.5 hours (
(27) Overall, growth was evident in all the stages of the experiment documented by increases in cell numbers during direct cell counts under fluorescent microscopy (
(28) The relationship between dilution rate and specific growth rate dictates the sustainability of the microbial population during continuous culture (Herbert et al., 1956; Fencl, 1966). For conditions corresponding to D>, like those exemplified, at 0.1 (47-55 h) and 10 MPa (81-103 h), instances of wash-out conditions suppressed biomass accumulation (
(29) M. Piezophila Fermentation Metabolism
(30) During the course of the experiment, dissolved formate was also monitored as metabolic byproduct of mixed acid fermentation to help inform the extent of M. piezophila fermentative growth. The concentrations of formate produced appear to follow cell concentrations, with maximum values of 0.510.02 mM observed at 30 MPa. At this point, the highest specific growth rates of 0.0420.007 h.sup.1 were attained (
(31) Description of M. Piezophila Continuous Growth
(32) Throughout the continuous culture of M. piezophila, microbial growth was adjusting to the different pressures and dilution rates. Considering the relationship between dilution rate and substrate availability on microbial growth during continuous culture, the growth patterns of M. piezophila at different pressures can be described following the Monod equation (Monod, Recherches sur la croissance des Cultures Bactriennes, Hermann, Paris, 1942, Monod, The growth of bacterial cultures, Annual Review of Microbiology, 3, 371-394, 1949; Herbert et al., 1956; Fencl, 1966; Harder et al., 1977):
(33)
where s is the concentration of the limiting growth substrate measured at the outflow of the bioreactor and K.sub.s is the substrate concentration at which =.sub.max/2. The .sub.max can be assumed that approximates the maximum specific growth rate measured in batch mode experiments (Herbert et al., 1956). While chemostats are considered self-adjusting systems that can reach steady-state conditions at different dilution rates (Harder et al., 1977), complete wash-out occurs when D is greater than a critical value (D.sub.c). At this point, the concentrations of s are equal to the concentrations (S.sub.R) introduced by the inflowing medium and the D.sub.c is estimated as follows:
(34)
(35) This is an important parameter as it defines the conditions under which negative growth rates prevail (Herbert et al., 1956; Russell and Cook, Energetics of bacterial-growthbalance of anabolic and catabolic reactions, Microbiol Rev, 59(1), 48-62, 1995). Such conditions might have occurred during the growth of M. piezophila at 10 MPa (81-103 h) (Table 1, 2), where an instance of negative , different from the imposed dilution rate, is documented (
(36) Discussion of Testing and Test Results
(37) By documenting the growth of M. piezophila under a range of dilution rates and pressures, the inventor has shown the success for continuous time series experiments with non-intrusive sampling. This growth assay demonstrates the effectiveness of the system in maintaining imposed temperature and pressures during a single run, over a period of 382 hours of continuous operation. This setup has also overcome the difficulty of incorporating gaseous substrates such as H.sub.2 and CO.sub.2 (data not shown;
(38) The combined temperature/pressure/dilution rate manipulation in the system allows for meaningful spatial and temporal experimentation of microbial processes associated with a broad array of unexplored environmental regimes. For example, this approach will be relevant for addressing the current debate about the size and activity of the deepest biosphere in the subsurface (Whitman et al., Prokaryotes: The unseen majority, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(12), 6578-6583, 1998; D'Hondt et al., Distributions of microbial activities in deep subseafloor sediments, Science, 306, 2216-2221, 2004; Lipp et al., Significant contribution of Archaea to extant biomass in marine subsurface sediments, Nature, 454(7207), 991-994, 2008; Fang et al., Deep-sea piezosphere and piezophiles: geomicrobiology and biogeochemistry, Trends in Microbiology, 18(9), 413-422, 2010; Hinrichs and Inagaki, Downsizing the deep biosphere, Science, 338(6104), 204-205, 2012; Jorgensen, Shrinking majority of the deep biosphere, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(40), 15976-15977, 2012; Kallmeyer et al., Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(40), 16213-16216, 2012; Hoehler and Jorgensen, Microbial life under extreme energy limitation, Nature Reviews in Microbiology, 11(2), 83-94, 2013). While it's well accepted that microorganisms are able to cope in spite of these extreme conditions (Morono et al., Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in deep subseafloor microbial cells, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(45), 18295-18300, 2011; Lomstein et al., Endospore abundance, microbial growth and necromass turnover in deep sub-seafloor sediment, Nature, 484(7392), 101-104, 2012; Orsi et al., Gene expression in the deep biosphere, Nature, 499(7457), 205-208, 2013), the way they assess energy status to shift from growing to surviving under maintenance energy conditions to being alive in a dormant stage remains unstudied and represents the foundation for such debate.
(39) By adopting dilution rates as low as those employed in our continuous culture experiment (0.013 h.sup.1), the relationship between energy limitation and microbial growth can be explored, by restraining growth rates to lower values than those attained in batch high-pressure cultures (Herbert et al., 1956; Russell and Cook, 1995; Hoehler and Jorgensen, 2013). The fundamental questions on the kinetics, bioenergetics and efficiency of microbial metabolisms, which have remained in its infant stage in the piezosphere, can now be exploited in combination with transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics (Hoskisson and Hobbs, Continuous culture-making a comeback?, Microbiology-SGM, 151, 3153-3159, 2005). This technological advancement, which allows the onsite incubation of microorganism without depressurization (
(40) As a final note, the development of the high-pressure bioreactor is also of practical significance for: i) the synthesis of microbial products in industrial biotechnology (Liu et al., 2007), ii) improving biofuel/bioremediation procedures (Aitken et al., 2004; Feng et al., 2007; Jones et al., Crude-oil biodegradation via methanogenesis in subsurface petroleum reservoirs, Nature, 451(7175), 176-180, 2008) and iii) contributing to high-pressure food processing research (Abid et al., Synergistic impact of sonication and high hydrostatic pressure on microbial and enzymatic inactivation of apple juice, Lwt-Food Sci Technol, 59(1), 70-76, 2014; Huang et al., Responses of microorganisms to high hydrostatic pressure processing, Food Control, 40, 250-259, 2014; Sansone et al., Effects of high pressure treatments on polymeric films for flexible food packaging, Packag Technol Sci, 27(9), 739-761, 2014). The recent documentation of microbially-mediated biodegradation processes in subsurface petroleum reservoirs on one hand (Aitken et al., 2004; Feng et al., 2007; Jones et al., 2008), and that of diesel-like fuel biosynthesis on the other (Schirmer et al., Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes, Science, 329(5991), 559-562, 2010; Choi and Lee, Microbial production of short-chain alkanes, Nature, 502(7472), 571-574, 2013; Harger et al., Expanding the product profile of a microbial alkane biosynthetic pathway, ACS Synthetic Biology, 2(1), 59-62, 2013; Howard et al., Synthesis of customized petroleum-replica fuel molecules by targeted modification of free fatty acid pools in Escherichia coli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(19), 7636-7641, 2013), make exemplary subjects for high-pressure continuous culture investigations of key microorganisms relevant to bioengineering. In any case, constraining microbial growth experimentally at elevated pressures will promote our fundamental knowledge of life in the piezosphere and the optimization of biomaterial yields or biological reaction rates for industrial applications.
(41) Experimental Procedures
(42) Bacterial Strains and Analytical Methods
(43) Marinitoga piezophila strain KA3.sup.T (DSM 14283; Alain et al. (2002)) is a strictly anaerobic, thermophilic (T.sub.opt=65 C.), and chemo-ogranotrophic sulfur reducing bacterium that has been shown to grow under elevated pressure conditions (P.sub.opt=40 MPa, doubling time 20 min). The strain was isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal environments (13 N East Pacific Rise) at a depth of 2630 m (Alain et al., 2002). In this set of experiments, KA3.sup.T grew in a medium modified from Ravot et al. (Thermotoga elfii sp. nov., a novel thermophilic bacterium from an African oil-producing well, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 45(2), 308-314, 1995) (I.sup.1): 0.3 g NH.sub.4Cl, 0.5 g MgCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O, 0.1 g CaCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O, 0.5 g KCl, 0.83 g sodium acetate trihydrate, 2 g tryptone, 30 g NaCl, 3.3 g PIPES, 1 ml of polyvitamin solution and 0.5 ml of 0.2 wt % resazurin. Along with tryphone and acetate as potential carbon sources for fermentation, yeast extract was also supplied (0.5 wt %-2 g/l) in the absence of elemental sulfur. The medium was maintained under a 100% N.sub.2 atmosphere, and after autoclaving at 120 C. for 20 minutes, it was adjusted to the optimal pH of 6 by the addition of 7 wt % K.sub.2HPO.sub.4 and KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 solutions. Culture medium was successfully maintained free of contamination throughout the course of the experiment. The pre-inoculum culture grew heterotrophically under elemental sulfur respiration for 16 hours before starting the continuous growth assay.
(44) Cells were stained with 0.1 wt % acridine orange solution and visualized with an Olympus BX 61 microscope with an oil immersion objective (UPlanF1 100/1.3). Scanning electron micrographs were taken using a model JSM-6500F field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL). The beam was operated at 1 nA and 15 kV. For scanning electron microscopy, cells were collected on polycarbonate RC filters pre-coated with 0.5 nm Iridium to prevent charging under the ion beam (Musat et al., Detecting metabolic activities in single cells, with emphasis on nanoSIMS, Ferns Microbiol Rev, 36(2), 486-511, 2012). A final layer of 0.5 nm Iridium was sputtered on the surface of processed filters.
(45) Specific growth rates (h.sup.1) were determined by the change/unit of cell concentration as function of time:
(46)
where C is cell density (number of cells/ml) and t.sub.d is the doubling time in hours (h). The rate was calculated by the slope of the linear function between the natural logarithm values of cell densities and incubation time.
(47) Dissolved formate concentrations were measured in filtered subsamples (0.2 m pore-size RC syringe filters) by ion chromatography (Metrohm MIC-3 Advanced IC, Metrosep A supp 7-250 column) with estimated uncertainties (2) of less than 2%.
(48) Statistical Analysis
(49) The statistical analysis was performed utilizing the technical graphic and data analysis software IGOR Pro and Arc 1.06 (http://www.stat.umn.edu/arc) (Cook and Weisberg, Applied regression including computing and graphics, 632 pp., Wiley-Interscience, 1999). The error in fit parameters was derived from the covariance matrix as SQRT(cov.sub.ii), reflecting deviation of 2 (95.4% confidence interval). 1/(analytical error).sup.2 values were applied as weight (York, Least squares fitting of a straight line with correlated errors, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 5(5), 320-324, 1969). Along with the two-tail probability (p-value), regression models take into consideration the chi-squared (.sup.2) distribution of the fitted values to assess the goodness-of-fit.
(50) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Data from high-pressure continuous culture of M. piezophila at 65 C. Flow Dilution Residence P Time rate Agitation rate time Cell density [HCOO.sup.]* [CH.sub.3COO.sup.]* MPa h ml/min rpm h.sup.1 h cells/ml mM mM 0.1 0 Batch 1.2 10.sup.6 0 5.2 4 10.sup.5 0.23 6.6 21.2 2.2 10.sup.6 0.05 6.6 29.2 2.0 10.sup.6 0.18 6.6 46.7 2 66 1.043 0.96 7.46 10.sup.6 0.07 0.06 6.4 0.2 53.2 2 62 1.043 0.96 2.08 10.sup.6 0.07 0.08 6.5 0.1 55.2 2 55 1.043 0.96 1.56 10.sup.6 0.09 0.08 6.6 0.1 70.7 0.16 62 0.083 11.98 6.2 10.sup.6 0.05 6.0 0.3 10 71.7 0.16 80.7 0.16 47 0.083 11.98 4.56 10.sup.6 0.09 0.06 6.5 0.2 93.2 0.16 70 0.083 11.98 7.06 10.sup.6 0.12 0.11 6.3 0.3 103.2 0.16 70 0.083 11.98 3.42 10.sup.6 0.06 0.01 6.5 0.1 20 103.2 0.16 116.7 0.16 79 0.083 76.66 7.04 10.sup.6 0.07 0.01 6.4 0.1 126.2 0.025 73 0.013 76.66 3.08 10.sup.6 0.17 0.00 6.7 0.0 141.2 0.025 70 0.013 76.66 7.68 10.sup.6 0.43 0.15 6.7 0.1 30 143.2 0.025 150.2 0.025 62 0.013 76.66 3.34 10.sup.6 0.49 0.16 6.5 0.2 164.7 0.025 62 0.013 76.66 4.84 10.sup.6 0.46 0.19 7.0 0.3 189.2 0.025 60 0.013 76.66 1.67 10.sup.7 0.51 0.02 6.8 0.1 194.2 0.025 60 0.013 76.66 2.68 10.sup.6 0.41 0.04 6.8 0.0 40 195.2 0.025 212.7 0.025 70 0.013 76.66 4.6 10.sup.6 0.34 0.03 6.9 0.8 241.7 0.025 0.013 76.66 2.96 10.sup.6 0.07 0.10 7.7 261.2 0.025 91 0.013 76.66 1.07 10.sup.7 0.08 0.03 8.1 0.2 285.2 0.025 98 0.013 76.66 1.34 10.sup.7 0.10 0.08 7.6 0.4 30 288.7 0.025 295.7 0.025 84 0.013 76.66 8.14 10.sup.6 0.07 0.07 7.7 307.7 0.025 87 0.013 76.66 5.04 10.sup.6 0.08 0.07 7.6 20 318.2 341.2 0.025 70 0.013 76.66 1.09 10.sup.7 0.07 0.07 7.2 10 341.2 357.2 0.025 80 0.013 76.66 4.68 10.sup.6 0.11 8.0 363.7 0.025 86 0.013 76.66 2.38 10.sup.6 0.07 0.07 7.5 0.1 363.7 0.025 381.2 0.025 89 0.013 76.66 2.44 10.sup.6 b.d. 7.6 Cell counts were calculated as:
(51) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Growth parameters of M. piezophila for a range of pressures at 65 C. P Specific growth Doubling r.sup.2 & p-value MPa rate h.sup.1 time h Conditions for 0.1 0.05 0.016 14.0 4.5 Batch 0.76-0.053 0.1 0.19 0.011 2 ml/min 0.99-0.036 10 (0.011 0.031).sup.# 0.16 ml/min 0.11-0.783 20 (0.009 0.04).sup.# 0.16-2 ml/min 0.05-0.863 30 0.042 0.007 16.4 2.7 0.025 ml/min 0.97-0.099 40 0.034 0.016 20.5 9.7 0.025 ml/min 0.81-0.283 .sup.#Poor quality of fit - calculations for samples collected at 80.7-103.2 h (10 MPa) and 116.7-141.2 h (20 MPa). Specific growth rates at 30 MPa and 40 MPa were calculated for samples showing evidence of growth. These were collected between 150.2-189.2 and 241.7-285.2 hours at 30 MPa and 40 MPa, respectively. At 0.1 MPa, calculations were conducted for the dataset corresponding to medium flow rates of 2 ml/min (46.7-55.2 h).
(52) It is to be understood that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described above. The invention may be practiced other than as particularly described and still be within the scope of the accompanying claims.