Printing plate
10279616 ยท 2019-05-07
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B41N1/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G03F7/00
PHYSICS
International classification
B41N1/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present disclosure provides a printing plate capable of stably suppressing occurrence of a marginal phenomenon. The printing plate includes a printing projection portion having a plurality of projections formed in a distributed manner on a top surface of the printing projection portion, wherein the top surface of the printing projection portion includes a center region and a peripheral edge region adjacent to a peripheral edge of the center region, wherein the peripheral edge region includes printing direction portions extending along a printing direction and perpendicular direction portions extending along a perpendicular direction perpendicular to the printing direction, wherein distribution densities of the projections are different among the center region, the printing direction portions, and the perpendicular direction portions, and wherein, among the distribution densities, a distribution density in the perpendicular direction portions is highest, and a distribution density in the printing direction portions is lowest.
Claims
1. A printing plate, comprising: a printing projection portion having a plurality of projections formed in a distributed manner on a top surface of the printing projection portion, wherein the top surface of the printing projection portion includes a center region and a peripheral edge region adjacent to a peripheral edge of the center region, wherein the peripheral edge region includes printing direction portions extending along a printing direction and perpendicular direction portions extending along a perpendicular direction perpendicular to the printing direction, wherein distribution densities of the projections are different among the center region, the printing direction portions, and the perpendicular direction portions, and wherein, among the distribution densities of the projections, a distribution density in the perpendicular direction portions is highest, and a distribution density in the printing direction portions is lowest.
2. The printing plate according to claim 1, wherein a ratio (MC/MA) between a distribution density (MC) of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions and a distribution density (MA) of the projections in the center region is 1.25.
3. The printing plate according to claim 1, wherein a ratio (MB/MA) between a distribution density (MB) of the projections in the printing direction portions and the distribution density (MA) of the projections in the center region is 0.75.
4. The printing plate according to claim 1, wherein a ratio (NC/NA) between an occupancy area ratio (NC) of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions and an occupancy area ratio (NA) of the projections in the center region is 0.8.
5. The printing plate according to claim 1, wherein a ratio (NB/NA) between an occupancy area ratio (NB) of the projections in the printing direction portions and the occupancy area ratio (NA) of the projections in the center region is 0.95.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
(5) Next, detailed description is made of an embodiment of the present disclosure with reference to the drawings.
(6)
(7) Moreover, the printing projection portion 2 is divided into three regions (portions) 2A to 2C based on a distribution density of the projections 3. The three regions (portions) 2A to 2C include a center region 2A, printing direction portions 2B, and perpendicular direction portions 2C of the printing projection portion 2. In a peripheral edge region adjacent to a peripheral edge of the center region 2A, the printing direction portions 2B extend along the printing direction, and the perpendicular direction portions 2C extend along a perpendicular direction perpendicular to the printing direction. Four corner portions of the printing projection portion 2 at which the printing direction portions 2B and the perpendicular direction portions 2C overlap are included in the perpendicular direction portions 2C.
(8) In this embodiment, a distribution density in the perpendicular direction portions 2C is highest. A distribution density in the center region 2A is next highest. A distribution density in the printing direction portions 2B is lowest. When the distribution density of the projections 3 is indicated by, for example, the number of projections 3 per inch (25.4 mm), the distribution density in the perpendicular direction portions 2C having the highest distribution density is set within a range of from 400 projections per inch to 600 projections per inch. The distribution density in the center region 2A having the next highest distribution density is set within a range of from 300 projections per inch to 500 projections per inch. The distribution density in the printing direction portions 2B having the lowest distribution density is set within a range of from 200 projections per inch to 400 projections per inch. It is preferred that a ratio (M.sub.C/M.sub.A) between a distribution density (M.sub.C) of the projections 3 in the perpendicular direction portions 2C and a distribution density (M.sub.A) of the projections 3 in the center region 2A be set to 1.25. Further, it is preferred that a ratio (M.sub.B/M.sub.A) between a distribution density (M.sub.B) of the projections 3 in the printing direction portions 2B and the density distribution density (M.sub.A) of the projections 3 in the center region 2A be set to 0.75.
(9) Further, in this embodiment, occupancy area ratios of the projections 3 are also different among the three regions (portions) 2A to 2C. The occupancy area ratios are set in the following descending order. The occupancy area ratio in the center region 2A is highest. The occupancy area ratio in the printing direction portions 2B is next highest. The occupancy area ratio in the perpendicular direction portions 2C is lowest. The occupancy area ratio of the projections 3 corresponds to a ratio between an area of the top surface of the printing projection portion 2 and a total bottom area of the projections 3. The occupancy area ratios of the projections 3 are set within the following ranges. That is, for example, the occupancy area ratio in the center region 2A having the highest occupancy area ratio is set within a range of from 40% to 50%. The occupancy area ratio in the printing direction portions 2B having the next highest occupancy area ratio is set within a range of from 38% to 48%. The occupancy area ratio in the perpendicular direction portions 2C having the lowest occupancy area ratio is set within a range of from 31% to 41%. It is preferred that a ratio (N.sub.C/N.sub.A) between an occupancy area ratio (N.sub.C) of the projections 3 in the perpendicular direction portions 2C and an occupancy area ratio (N.sub.A) of the projections 3 in the center region 2A be set to 0.8. Further, it is preferred that a ratio (N.sub.B/N.sub.A) between an occupancy area ratio (N.sub.B) of the projections 3 in the printing direction portions 2B and the occupancy ratio (N.sub.A) of the projections 3 in the center region 2A be set to 0.95.
(10) Moreover, in this embodiment, depths (depth from the top surface of the projection 3 to the top surface of the printing projection portion 2) of the projections 3 are also different among the three regions (portions) 2A to 2C. The depths are set in the descending order reverse to the descending order of the distribution densities. That is, the depth 2 in the printing direction portions 2B is largest. The depth D1 in the center region 2A is next largest. The depth D in the perpendicular direction portions 2C is smallest. For example, the depth D2 of the projections 3 in the printing direction portions 2B having the largest depth is set within a range of from 15 m to 25 m. The depth D1 of the projections 3 in the center region 2A having the next largest depth is set within a range of from 10 m to 20 m. The depth D of the projections 3 in the perpendicular direction portions 2C having the smallest depth is set within a range of from 5 m to 15 m.
(11) In each of the three regions (portions) 2A to 2C, the dimensions and formation pitches of the projections 3 are evenly set. Therefore, in each of the three regions (portions) 2A to 2C, the distribution density, the occupancy area ratio, and the depth of the projections 3 are also evenly set.
(12) On the printing plate P, a region having the printing projection portion 2 is a print region. An outer shape dimension of the top surface of the printing projection portion 2 is set to an outer shape dimension of a printing film to be printed. A width WE of each of the printing direction portions 2B on the printing projection portion 2 is set within a range of from 1.2% to 2.2% of a perpendicular direction length (length of a side perpendicular to the printing direction) of the top surface of the printing projection portion 2. A width W.sub.C of each of the perpendicular direction portions 2C is set within a range of from 1.2% to 2.2% of a printing direction length (length of a side along the printing direction) of the top surface of the printing projection portion 2. Moreover, dimensions of the projections 3 each having the truncated cone shape are set as follows. For example, a diameter of a top surface is set within a range of from 20 m to 70 m. A diameter of a bottom surface is set within a range of from 185% to 300% of the diameter of the top surface. The depth is set within a range of from 5 m to 25 m. The formation pitch is set within a range of from 51 m to 85 m.
(13) The printing plate P is to be used for the flexoprinting, and is flexible so that the printing plate P can be mounted to the peripheral surface of the plate cylinder 51 of the printing machine (see
(14) The flexo printing using the above-mentioned printing plate P enables formation of a printing film such as an alignment film of a liquid crystal display, an organic light-emitting film of an organic EL, or an electrode film of an electronic device with improved evenness in thickness.
(15) At the time of the above-mentioned printing, through setting of the distribution density of the projections 3 on the printing plate P, the pressure generated at the time of contact of the printing projection portion 2 with the anilox roll 52 of the printing machine and the printing material Q (see
(16) In the embodiment described above, the occupancy area ratios of the projections 3 are set in the following descending order. The occupancy area ratio in the center region 2A is highest. The occupancy area ratio in the printing direction portions 2B is next highest. The occupancy area ratio in the perpendicular direction portions 2C is lowest. However, as long as the distribution density of the projections 3 is set to be highest at the perpendicular direction portions 2C, other descending orders of the occupancy area ratios of the projections 3 may be employed. Even in such a case, the evenness in thickness of the printing film can be improved.
(17) In the embodiment described above, the depths of the projections 3 are set in the following descending order. The depth D2 in the printing direction portions 2B is largest. The depth D1 in the center region 2A is next largest. The depth D3 in the perpendicular direction portions 2C is smallest. However, as long as the distribution density of the projections 3 is set to be highest at the perpendicular direction portions 2C, other descending orders of the depths of the projections 3 may be employed. Even in such a case, the evenness in thickness of the printing film can be improved.
(18) In the embodiment described above, the projections 3 each have a truncated cone shape. However, other shape such as a columnar shape may be employed.
(19) Next, an Example is described together with a Related-art Example and Comparative Examples. However, the present disclosure is not limited to the Example.
EXAMPLES
Example
(20) A printing plate illustrated in
(21) In this Example, a ratio (M.sub.C/M.sub.A) between a distribution density (M.sub.C) of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions and a distribution density (M.sub.A) of the projections in the center region was set to 1.25. A ratio (M.sub.B/M.sub.A) between a distribution density (M.sub.B) of the projections in the printing direction portions and the distribution density (M.sub.A) of the projections in the center region was set to 0.75. Further, a ratio (N.sub.C/N.sub.A) between an occupancy area ratio (N.sub.C) of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions and an occupancy area ratio (N.sub.A) of the projections in the center region was set to 0.8. A ratio (N.sub.B/N.sub.A) between an occupancy area ratio (N.sub.B) of the projections in the printing direction portions and the occupancy area ratio (N.sub.A) of the projections in the center region was set to 0.95.
Related-Art Example
(22) The Example described above was modified such that the distribution density of the projections in the peripheral edge region was set to 500 (projections per inch) at each of the printing direction portions and the perpendicular direction portions.
Comparative Example 1
(23) The Example described above was modified such that the distribution density of the projections in the peripheral edge region was set to 400 (projections per inch) which was equal to the distribution density in the center region.
Comparative Example 2
(24) The Example described above was modified such that the distribution density of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions in the peripheral edge region was set to 400 (projections per inch) which was equal to the distribution density in the center region.
Comparative Example 3
(25) The Example described above was modified such that the distribution density of the projections in the printing direction portions in the peripheral edge region was set to 400 (projections per inch) which was equal to the distribution density in the center region.
Comparative Example 4
(26) The Example described above was modified such that the distribution density of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions in the peripheral edge region and the distribution density of the projections at the printing direction portions were replaced with one another. That is, the distribution density of the projections in the printing direction portions was set to 500 (projections per inch), and the distribution density of the projections in the perpendicular direction portions was set to 300 (projections per inch).
(27) TABLE-US-00001 Related-art Comparative Examples Example Example 1 2 3 4 Distribution Center region 400 density Perpendicular 500 400 500 300 direction portion Printing 300 500 400 300 400 500 direction portion Occupancy Center region 45 area ratio Perpendicular 36 45 36 43 direction portion Printing direction 43 36 45 43 45 36 portion Depth Center region 14.1 Perpendicular 11.6 14.1 11.6 20.7 direction portion Printing 20.7 11.6 14.1 20.7 14.1 11.6 direction portion Units: distribution density (projections per inch), occupancy area ratio (%), depth (m)
Printing
(28) The printing plates of the Example, Related-art Example, and Comparative Examples 1 to 4 described above were mounted to the plate cylinder of the printing machine illustrated in
(29) [Measurement of Thickness of Printing Film]
(30) A thickness of the printing film was measured with use of a film thickness measurement device (ET-1479 manufactured by Kosaka Laboratory Ltd.). Measurement was performed on four positions including the front, rear, left, and right in the printing direction for each of the regions of the printing film printed in the center region and the peripheral edge region of the printing projection portion. The results are shown in
(31) From the results shown in
(32) A specific embodiment of the present disclosure has been described in Example above. However, the Example is for illustrative purposes only and is not to be construed as limitative. It is intended that various modifications apparent to a person skilled in the art fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
(33) The printing plate according to the present disclosure is usable for a case of stably suppressing occurrence of the marginal phenomenon and improving evenness in thickness of the printing film.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
(34) P printing plate 2 printing projection portion 2A center region 2B printing direction portion 2C perpendicular direction portion 3 projection