Diesel Common-Rail Piezo-Operated Servo Injector
20190128201 ยท 2019-05-02
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F02D2041/2051
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/3827
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M63/023
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M2200/21
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/2096
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D2041/389
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/2467
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M51/0603
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F02D41/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/24
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M63/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M51/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/38
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
Various embodiments may include a method for operating a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector comprising: partially charging the piezo-actuator from a non-charged state at 0 V (method a); partially discharging the piezo-actuator from an already charged state to a remaining limited charge (method b); measuring the piezo-voltage with both methods and comparing the results; when the comparison demonstrates correspondence within a predefined threshold, using method b in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out; and when the comparison does not demonstrate correspondence within the predefined threshold, using method a without using method b.
Claims
1. A method for operating a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector in which a piezo-actuator opens and closes a nozzle needle by means of a servo valve, the method comprising: partially charging the piezo-actuator from a non-charged state at 0 V (method a); partially discharging the piezo-actuator from an already charged state to a remaining limited charge (method b); measuring the piezo-voltage with both methods and comparing the results; determining a voltage for the piezo-actuator for each operating point so that the piezo-actuator applies a force necessary for contact with the servo valve without influencing the injection process itself by opening the servo valve; when the comparison demonstrates correspondence within a predefined threshold, using method b in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out; and when the comparison does not demonstrate correspondence within the predefined threshold, using method a without using method b.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising switching to and fro between method a and method b during a specific injection process throughout one engine cycle.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising measuring the force during a specific main injection.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising measuring the force during times at which no large change of the operating point takes place.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising carrying out the partial discharging of the piezo-actuator (method b) starting from a charged state of said piezo-actuator associated with an actual injection.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising executing the partial charging (method a) after complete discharging of the piezo-actuator.
7. A motor vehicle comprising: a combustion chamber; a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector operating to inject fuel into the combustion chamber; and a control unit programmed to: partially charge the piezo-actuator from a non-charged state at 0 V (method a); partially discharge the piezo-actuator from an already charged state to a remaining limited charge (method b); measure the piezo-voltage with both methods and comparing the results; determine a voltage for the piezo-actuator for each operating point so that the piezo-actuator applies a force necessary for contact with the servo valve without influencing the injection process itself by opening the servo valve; when the comparison demonstrates correspondence within a predefined threshold, use method b in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out; and when the comparison does not demonstrate correspondence within the predefined threshold, use method a without using method b.
Description
[0018] The invention is explained in detail below with reference to an exemplary embodiment in connection with the drawing. In the drawing:
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022] In the case of the method described here for operating a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector, the piezo-actuator is actuated as a sensor in order to measure the force applied to the servo valve. In order to be able to carry out the corresponding force measurement, the correct quantity of charge for the piezo-actuator must be determined so that said piezo-actuator brings about the force contact, necessary for the force measurement, with the servo valve without influencing the injection process itself by opening the servo valve. In other words, the piezo-actuator has to overcome the air gap, present in the non-charged state, between the actuator and the servo valve.
[0023] For this purpose, according to the method a illustrated in
[0024] In the method b illustrated in
[0025]
[0026] The piezo-voltage at the piezo-actuator is measured with both methods, and the results are compared with one another. When there is sufficient correspondence, method b is carried out in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out. When there is not sufficient correspondence no application of method b takes place.