COMBINATION THERAPY COMPRISING AN INFLAMMATORY IMMUNOCYTOKINE AND A CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR)-T CELL
20190125840 ยท 2019-05-02
Inventors
- Wolfgang Berdel (Muenster, DE)
- Claudia Rossig (Muenster, DE)
- Christoph Schliemann (Muenster, DE)
- Bianca Altvater (Porta Westfalica, DE)
- Sareetha Kailayangiri (Hamm, DE)
Cpc classification
A61K39/4611
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C07K2319/033
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K2239/38
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61P35/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K39/395
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The present invention relates to a combination comprising at least fusion protein comprising a binding protein specifically recognizing a cancer-related antigen and an inflammatory cytokine, and a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell recognizing a cancer-related antigen.
Claims
1. A combination comprising at least a) a fusion protein comprising a1) a binding protein specifically recognizing a cancer-related antigen and a2) an inflammatory cytokine, and b) a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell recognizing a cancer-related antigen.
2. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the cancer-related antigen recognized by the binding protein is cancer stroma-related and/or the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell recognizes a cancer cell-related antigen.
3. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the cancer-related antigen recognized by the binding protein is an angiogenesis marker.
4. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the cancer-related antigen recognized by the binding protein is a fibronectin, or a splice isoform thereof, and/or a subdomain thereof.
5. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the cancer-related antigen recognized by the binding protein is the ED.sub.B domain of fibronectin.
6. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the inflammatory cytokine is one selected from the group consisting of IL2 and IL15.
7. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the CAR-T cell recognizes disialoganglioside GD2.
8. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the binding protein comprises at least one of the group selected from antibody, modified antibody format, antibody derivative or fragment retaining target binding properties antibody-based binding protein, oligopeptide binder and/or an antibody mimetic.
9. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the binding protein contains at least one CDR sequence of the L19 antibody.
10. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the binding protein comprises the sequences according to SEQ ID No. 6 to 11.
11. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the binding protein comprises at least one V heavy chain according to SEQ ID No. 1 or at least one V light chain according to SEQ ID No. 2.
12. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the heavy and the light chain are connected by a peptide linker.
13. The combination according to claim 11, wherein the peptide linker comprises a sequence according to SEQ ID No 3, or a sequence having at least 90% identity to the sequence according to SEQ ID No 3.
14. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the IL2 or the IL15 is mammalian IL2 or IL15, preferably human IL2 or IL15, or a functional variant thereof.
15. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the IL2 comprises a sequence according to SEQ ID No 4, or a functional variant thereof.
16. The combination according to wherein the IL15 comprises a sequence according to SEQ ID No 12, or a functional variant thereof.
17. The combination according to claim 1, wherein a fusion protein linker is connecting the binding protein and the inflammatory cytokine part.
18. The combination according to claim 16, wherein the fusion protein linker has a length of between 1 and 30 amino acids.
19. The combination according to claim 16, wherein the fusion protein linker comprises a sequence according to SEQ ID No. 5.
20. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the fusion protein is PEGylated.
21. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) in the T cell comprises 14.G2a-zeta, 14.G2a-BBzeta or 14.G2a-28zeta.
22. The combination according to claim 1 for use in the treatment of a human or animal subject suffering from, at risk of developing, and/or being diagnosed for a given pathologic condition.
23. The combination according to claim 22, or use thereof, wherein the pathologic condition is a neoplastic disease.
24. The combination according to claim 22, or use thereof, wherein the pathologic condition is a solid tumor, in particular a lymphoma, carcinoma, sarcoma, or a leukemia.
25. The combination according to claim 1, or use thereof, wherein the fusion protein and the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell are to be administered as concomitant and/or adjunctive therapy.
26. The combination according to claim 1, or use thereof, wherein the fusion protein and the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell are to be administered as sequential therapy.
Description
FIGURES
[0095]
TABLE-US-00001 run antibody T cells 1 KSF-IL2 2 L19-IL2 3 non-transduced T cells 4 CAR-T (14.G2a-BBzeta) 5 L19-IL2 non-transduced T cells 6 L19-IL2 CAR-T (14.G2a-BBzeta)
[0096]
[0097]
[0098]
[0099]
[0100]
[0101]
[0102]
[0103]
[0104]
[0105]
[0106]
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Sarcoma Xenograft Experiments
[0107] A localized Ewing sarcoma model which relies on subcutaneous xenografting of 210.sup.6 VH-64 Ewing sarcoma cells per mouse into NOD/scid gamma (NSG) mice was produced.
[0108] Upon a tumor volume of 200-300 mm.sup.3 mice received intraperitoneal treatment with L19-IL2 (30 g twice-weekly on days 1, 5, 8, 12, 14, and 20), and with intravenous injection of 3 doses of 110.sup.7 14.G2a-BBzeta-transduced T cells, or non-transduced T cells as controls (see
[0112] The combination of CAR-T cells and the immunocytokine drastically increased tumor infiltrationa finding which was completely unanticipated, because none of the current theories that explain the challenges CAR-T cells face when infiltration a solid tumor (active tumor-mediated immunosuppression, functional changes in T lymphocytes after ex vivo manipulation, physical inhibition of infiltration by the desmoplastic stroma which the cells need to penetrate) would render the synergistic effect the immunocytokine has on CAR-T cell infiltration obvious.
[0113] The functional implication of a cytokine, namely to merely regulate the activity of T cells, can not explain its supportive effect in the present scenario, where tumor-mediated immunosuppression, functional changes in T lymphocytes after ex vivo manipulation and/or physical inhibition of infiltration by the desmoplastic stroma challenge the anti tumor efficacy of the T cells.
REFERENCES
[0114] Kowalczyk A et al. (2009), Cancer letters vol. 281 (2) p. 171-82 [0115] List T, Neri D (2013), Clinical pharmacology: advances and applications vol. 5 p. 29-45 [0116] Imai C et al. (2004), Leukemia, April; 18(4):676-84 [0117] Zou W (2005) Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 263-274 [0118] Caruana I et al. (2015), Nature medicine vol. 21 (5) p. 524-9 [0119] Louis C U et al. (2011), Blood, 118: 6050-6 [0120] Kershaw M H et al (2005), Clin Cancer Res, 12: 6106-6115 [0121] Lamers C H J et al. (2007), Cancer Immunol Immunother, 56: 1875-1883 [0122] Park J R et al. (2007), Molecular Therapy 15: 825-833 [0123] Schliemann C et al. (2009), Leuk Res. December; 33(12):1718-22 [0124] Zardi et al. (1987), Embo J.; 6:2337-2342 [0125] Kaspar et al. (2006), Int J Cancer, 118:1331-1339 [0126] Pini et al. (1998), J Biol Chem.; 273:21769-21776 [0127] Borsi et al. (2002), Int J Cancer.; 102:75-85 [0128] Berndorff et al. (2006), J Nucl Med.; 47:1707-1716 [0129] Berndorff et al. (2005), Clin Cancer Res.; 11:7053s-7063s [0130] Demartis et al. (2001), Eur J Nucl Med; 28:534-53 [0131] Meazza et al. (1996), Br.J.Cancer. 74:788-795 [0132] White E S, Muro A F (2011), IUBMB life vol. 63 (7) p. 538-46 [0133] Rybak et al (2007), Cancer research vol. 67 (22) p. 10948-57 Paxton, R J (2001), Current protocols in immunology/edited by John E. Coligan . . . [et al.] vol. Chapter 6 p. Unit 6.22 [0134] Kaspar et al (2006), Cancer research vol. 67 (10) p. 4940-8 [0135] Pegram et al. (2015), Leukemia vol. 29 (2) p. 415-22 [0136] Mujoo, K; Kipps, T J; Yang, H M; Cheresh, D A; Wargalla, U et al. (1989), Cancer research,vol. 49 (11) p. 2857-61
TABLE-US-00002 SequenceListing SeqNo Specification Sequence(Onelettercode) 1 VhL19 EVQLLESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAASGFTFSSFSMSWVRQAPGKGLEWVSSISGSSGTT YYADSVKGRFTISRDNSKNTLYLQMNSLRAEDTAVYYCAKPFPYFDYWGQGTLVTVSS 2 VlL19 EIVLTQSPGTLSLSPGERATLSCRASQSVSSSFLAWYQQKPGQAPRLLIYYASSRATG IPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISRLEPEDFAVYYCQQTGRIPPTFGQGTKVEIK 3 scFvLinker GDGSSGGSGGAS 4 humanIL2 APTSSSTKKTQLQLEHLLLDLQMILNGINNYKNPKLTRMLTFKFYMPKKATELKHLQC LEEELKPLEEVLNLAQSKNFHLRPRDLISNINVIVLELKGSETTFMCEYADETATIVE FLNRWITFCQSIISTLT 5 Fusionprotein EFSSSSGSSSSGSSSSG linker 6 CDR1Vh SFSMS 7 CDR3Vh PFPYFDY 8 CDR2Vh SISGSSGTTYYADSVKG 9 CDR1Vl RASQSVSSSFLA 10 CDR2Vl YASSRAT 11 CDR3Vl QQTGRIPPT 12 humanIL15 NWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDAS IHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINTS