PRIMARY BREAST EPITHELIAL CELL CULTURE MEDIUM, CULTURE METHOD AND USE THEREOF

Abstract

Provided is a culture medium containing amphiregulin for culturing primary breast epithelial cells and a culture method involving using the medium. In the culturing method, primary cells are cultured on a culture vessel coated with an extracellular matrix gel by using the culture medium, and the primary cells grow on the culture vessel, which has been coated with the extracellular matrix gel, and proliferate rapidly under the combined action of nutrient factors and an extracellular matrix contained in the primary cell culture medium. The cell model obtained by the primary cell culture medium and the primary cell culture method can be used for the evaluating the efficacy of and screening drugs.

Claims

1. A primary cell culture medium for culturing primary breast epithelial cells, characterized in that: the medium comprises amphiregulin.

2. The primary cell culture medium of claim 1, characterized in that: the content of the amphiregulin is 10 ng/ml to 100 ng/ml.

3. The primary cell culture medium of claim 1, characterized in that: the medium further comprises one or more or all of epidermal growth factor, insulin, B27, ROCK kinase inhibitor Y27632, Neuregulin 1, fibroblast growth factor 7, TGFβ type I receptor inhibitor A8301, and P38/MAPK inhibitor SB202190.

4. The primary cell culture medium of claim 3, characterized in that: the content of epidermal growth factor is 2.5 ng/ml or more, preferably 2.5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml; the content of insulin is 1 μg/ml to 10 μg/ml; B27 is diluted with a final concentration of 1:25 to 1:100; the content of Y27632 is 5 μM to 15 μM; the content of Neuregulin 1 is 5 nM to 20 nM; the content of fibroblast growth factor 7 is 2.5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml; the content of A8301 is 100 nM to 500 nM; and the content of SB202190 is 100 nM to 500 nM.

5. The primary cell culture medium of claim 1, characterized in that: the medium does not comprise serum, bovine pituitary extract, Wnt agonists, R-spondin family proteins, BMP inhibitors, fibroblast growth factor 10, nicotinamide and N-acetylcysteine.

6. The primary cell culture medium of claim 1, characterized in that: the primary breast epithelial cells are breast tumor cells, normal breast epithelial cells, or breast epithelial stem cells.

7. A method for culturing primary breast epithelial cell, comprising the following steps: (1) preparing the primary cell culture medium according to claim 1; (2) coating a culture vessel with extracellular matrix gel diluent; (3) inoculating primary breast epithelial cells in the coated culture vessel, culturing the cells under normoxic condition or hypoxic condition by using the primary cell culture medium, and digesting the cells for passaging when the primary breast epithelial cells grow to a cell density that accounts for 80% to 90% of the bottom area of the culture vessel.

8. The method of claim 7, characterized in that: the extracellular matrix gel is of low growth factor type; the extracellular matrix gel is diluted with serum-free medium, and the dilution ratio of the extracellular matrix gel is 1:50 to 1:400; and the coating step involves adding the diluted extracellular matrix gel into the culture vessel to cover the bottom of the culture vessel completely, and standing for 30 minutes or more.

9. A method for evaluating the efficacy of the drug for treating breast diseases, characterized in that, comprising the following steps: (1) culturing breast epithelial cells by using the method according to claim 7; (2) selecting the drugs for testing; (3) based on the maximum plasma concentration of the drug Cmax as a reference, taking 2-5 times of Cmax as the initial concentration, and diluting the drug into different drug concentration gradients; (4) digesting the breast epithelial cells cultured in step (1) into a single cell suspension, diluting the single cell suspension with a primary cell culture medium comprising amphiregulin and extracellular matrix gel, adding the diluted cell suspension to the multi-well plate at the density of 1000-10000 cells per well, and adhering overnight; (5) adding the drug with gradient dilutions to the adherent cells obtained in step (4); (6) detecting the cell viability.

10. The method of claim 9, characterized in that: in the cell viability detection, a cell viability detection reagent is added to each well; and after uniformly shaking, the chemiluminescence intensity of each well is measured with a fluorescence microplate reader; a drug dose-effect curve is plotted based on the measured values; and the inhibitory intensity of each drug on the proliferation of cells is calculated.

11. The primary cell culture medium of claim 2, characterized in that: the primary breast epithelial cells are breast tumor cells, normal breast epithelial cells, or breast epithelial stem cells.

12. The primary cell culture medium of claim 3, characterized in that: the primary breast epithelial cells are breast tumor cells, normal breast epithelial cells, or breast epithelial stem cells.

13. The primary cell culture medium of claim 4, characterized in that: the primary breast epithelial cells are breast tumor cells, normal breast epithelial cells, or breast epithelial stem cells.

14. The primary cell culture medium of claim 5, characterized in that: the primary breast epithelial cells are breast tumor cells, normal breast epithelial cells, or breast epithelial stem cells.

15. The method of claim 7, wherein the content of the amphiregulin in the culture medium prepared in step (1) is 10 ng/ml to 100 ng/ml.

16. The method of claim 7, wherein the culture medium prepared in step (1) further comprises one or more or all of epidermal growth factor, insulin, B27, ROCK kinase inhibitor Y27632, Neuregulin 1, fibroblast growth factor 7, TGFβ type I receptor inhibitor A8301, and P38/MAPK inhibitor SB202190.

17. The method of claim 7, wherein in the culture medium prepared in step (1): the content of epidermal growth factor is 2.5 ng/ml or more, preferably 2.5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml; the content of insulin is 1 μg/ml to 10 μg/ml; B27 is diluted with a final concentration of 1:25 to 1:100; the content of Y27632 is 5 μM to 15 μM; the content of Neuregulin 1 is 5 nM to 20 nM; the content of fibroblast growth factor 7 is 2.5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml; the content of A8301 is 100 nM to 500 nM; the content of SB202190 is 100 nM to 500 nM.

18. The method of claim 7, wherein the culture medium prepared in step (1) does not comprise serum, bovine pituitary extract, Wnt agonists, R-spondin family proteins, BMP inhibitors, fibroblast growth factor 10, nicotinamide and N-acetylcysteine.

19. The method of claim 9, wherein for the culturing step (1), the extracellular matrix gel is of low growth factor type; the extracellular matrix gel is diluted with serum-free medium, and the dilution ratio of the extracellular matrix gel is 1:50 to 1:400; and the coating step involves adding the diluted extracellular matrix gel into the culture vessel to cover the bottom of the culture vessel completely, and standing for 30 minutes or more.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0049] FIG. 1 are photographs under an inverted phase contrast microscope of the primary breast epithelial cells obtained by culturing the cells, where are isolated from clinical breast tissue samples, using the primary cell culture method of the invention.

[0050] FIG. 2 are photographs under microscope of the cells, which were obtained by inoculating and culturing the primary breast tumor cells isolated from two different breast cancer clinical tissue samples (HMFL-XN30, HMFL-XN22) in culture plates coated with extracellular matrix gel and without any coating.

[0051] FIG. 3 are graphs for illustrating the effect of amphiregulin on the proliferation of primary breast tumor cells.

[0052] FIG. 4 are the comparison of cell growth curves obtained by culturing the cells isolated from two breast cancer clinical tissue samples (HMFL-XN12, HMFL-XN21) using the cell conditional reprogramming technology, the technology of the invention and the organoid technology, respectively, and the photographs under microscope of HMFL-XN21 cultured to day 27.

[0053] FIG. 5 are photographs under inverted microscope of the breast tumor cells, which were isolated from a breast cancer clinical tissue sample (HMFL-XN12) and cultured to day 9 and day 22 using the technology of the invention.

[0054] FIG. 6 are the comparison of immunofluorescence staining results of the breast tumor cells, which were isolated from a surgically resected sample of breast cancer (HMFL-XN7) and cultured by the technology of the invention, with the immunohistochemical results of the original tissue section of the tissue sample.

[0055] FIG. 7 shows the gene mutation consistency analysis of the breast tumor cells of different passages, which were obtained by culturing the cells isolated from two cases of breast cancer surgical resection samples using the technology of the invention, and the chromosome karyotype analysis result of one case.

[0056] FIG. 8 shows the tumorigenicity of the breast tumor cells in mice obtained by culturing the primary breast tumor cells derived from the cancer tissues of two cases of pathologically diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer patients using the technology of the invention.

[0057] FIG. 9 are graphs showing the dose-response curves of the primary breast tumor cells cultured by the technology of the invention on different chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted drugs, and the calculated half-inhibition rate.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Example 1

[0058] Isolation of human primary breast epithelial cells and optimization of primary breast epithelial cell culture medium

[0059] (1) Isolation of Human Primary Breast Epithelial Cells

[0060] Breast cancer tissue samples were obtained from the cancer tissues of five informed and consenting breast tumor patients by surgical resection, namely HMFL-XN1, HMFL-XN3, HMFL-XN4, HMFL-XN6, and HMFL-XN8. One of the samples (HMFL-XN1) will be described below. The aforementioned tissue samples were collected within half an hour after the surgical excision or the biopsy. More specifically, in a sterile environment, tissue samples from non-necrotic sites were cut with a volume of more than 0.5 cm.sup.3 and were placed in 20 mL of pre-cooled DMEM/F12 medium (manufactured by Corning Inc.). The medium was placed in a 50 mL plastic sterile centrifuge tube with a lid and transported to the laboratory on ice; wherein, the DMEM/F12 medium contained 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 U/mL streptomycin (hereinafter referred to as the transport fluid).

[0061] In the biological safety cabinet, the tissue sample (HMFL-XN1) was transferred to a 100 mm cell culture dish. The tissue sample was rinsed with the transport fluid. The blood cells on the surface of the tissue sample was washed away. Unwanted tissues such as skin and fascia on the surface of the tissue sample were removed.

[0062] The rinsed tissue sample was transferred to another new 100 mm culture dish; 10 mL of transport fluid was added, and a sterile scalpel blade and a forceps were used to divide the tissue sample into tissue fragments less than 1 mm.sup.3 in diameter.

[0063] The tissue sample fragments were transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes using a table-top centrifuge; after carefully removing the supernatant from the centrifuge tube with a pipette, the rest was resuspended in 10 mL serum-free DMEM/F12 medium containing collagenase II (1 mg/mL) and collagenase IV (1 mg/mL). It was placed on a shaker with constant temperature of 37° C. for shaking digestion for 1 hour and then was centrifuged at 350 g/min in a tabletop centrifuge for 5 minutes. After discarding the supernatant, the digested tissue cells were resuspended in 10 mL of DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and then it was grounded and sieved, with the cell sieve aperture of 100 μm, and the sieved cell suspension was collected in a 50 mL centrifuge tube; the cells were counted with a hemocytometer.

[0064] The cell suspension was then centrifuged at 350 g/min for 5 minutes in a centrifuge; after discarding the supernatant, it was resuspended in the primary cell culture medium of the invention.

[0065] The other four breast tumor tissue samples were isolated in the same way as above.

[0066] (2) Optimization of Primary Breast Epithelial Cell Culture Medium

[0067] Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences) was diluted at 1:100 in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium to prepare an extracellular matrix dilution, which was added to a 48-well culture plate with 200 μl/well to completely cover the bottom of the wells of the culture plate. The resultant was let stand for 1 hour in a 37° C. incubator. After 1 hour, the extracellular matrix dilution was removed to provide a Matrigel-coated plate.

[0068] First, a basis medium was prepared. To a commercial DMEM/F-12 medium, GlutaMAX-I (manufactured by Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) was added at the specified concentration (1:100 dilution), human insulin (manufactured by Sigma) was added at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml, ROCK kinase inhibitor Y27632 (manufactured by Sigma) was added at a final concentration of 10 μM, and penicillin-streptomycin (manufactured by Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) was added at a 1:100 dilution ratio, which provides the basis medium.

[0069] Next, different types of additives (as shown in Table 1) were added to the basis medium to prepare breast epithelial cell culture mediums containing different supplementary components, and the mediums with different components were added at a volume of 500 μl/well to 48-well plates which were coated with extracellular matrix gel (Matrigel). Breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN1) isolated from breast cancer tissue in step (1) of this Example were inoculated in a Matrigel-coated 48-well culture plate at a cell density of 1×10.sup.4 cells/well, and equal numbers of freshly isolated breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN1) were cultured under different medium formulations at 37° C., under 5% CO.sub.2 concentration and 20% oxygen concentration. The medium was renewed every 4 days after the start of the culture. After 10 days of culture, cell counts were performed. As an experiment control, the basis medium without any additives was used. Breast tumor cells isolated from the remaining four breast cancer tissue samples were cultured and counted in the same manner as above. The experimental results are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Serial Type of medium Degree Number additives Supplier Concentration of cell 1 N2 Gibco 100× + 2 Epidermal growth R&D 10 ng/ml + factor 3 Hepatocyte growth Peprotech 20 ng/ml + factor 4 Basic fibroblast growth R&D 20 ng/ml + factor 5 R-spondin1 R&D 250 ng/ml ○ 6 R-spondin3 R&D 250 ng/ml ○ 7 Prostaglandin E2 Tocris 1 μM − 8 Insulin growth factor1 Peprotech 50 ng/ml + 9 Human leukemia Peprotech 100 ng/ml − inhibitory factor 10 Triiodothyronine MCE 5 nM ○ 11 B27 Gibco  50× + 12 A8301 MCE 500 nM + 13 SB202190 MCE 500 nM + 14 A8301 + SB202190 / 500 nM + 15 Nicotinamide Sigma 10 mM − 16 N-Acetyl Cysteine Sigma 1.25 mM − 17 Nicotinamide + / 10 mM + − N-Acetyl Cysteine 1.25 mM 18 Blebbistatin MCE 10 μM − 19 Amphiregulin R&D 20 ng/ml + 20 Cholera toxin Sigma 0.1 nM ○ 21 Fibroblast growth R&D 10 ng/ml + factor 7 22 Fibroblast growth Peprotech 10 ng/ml + factor 10 23 Neuregulin 1 Peprotech 10 nM + 24 Noggin R&D 100 ng/ml ○ 25 Interleukin 6 R&D 5 ng/ml − 26 Interleukin 10 R&D 50 ng/ml ○ Wherein, “+” indicates that compared with the basis medium, the medium added with the additive(s) can promote the proliferation of primary breast tumor epithelial cells isolated from at least three cases of breast cancer tissues; “−” indicates that the medium added with the additive(s) has the effect of inhibiting proliferation of primary breast tumor epithelial cells isolated from at least two cases of breast cancer tissues; “○” indicates that the medium added with this additive(s) has no significant effect on the proliferation of primary breast tumor epithelial cells isolated from at least three cases of breast cancer tissues.

Example 2

[0070] Culture of Human Primary Breast Epithelial Cells

[0071] (1) Preparation of Primary Breast Epithelial Cell Culture Medium

[0072] First, a basis medium was prepared in the same manner as in step (2) of Example 1. To the basis medium, human amphiregulin (manufactured by R&D Systems) was added at a final concentration of 20 ng/ml, EGF (manufactured by Peprotech) was added at a final concentration of 10 ng/ml, B27 (manufactured by Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) was added at a dilution ratio of 1:50, human Neuregulin 1 (manufactured by Peprotech) was added at a final concentration of 10 nM, FGF7 (manufactured by R&D Systems) was added at a final concentration of 10 ng/ml, the TGFβ1 inhibitor A8301 (manufactured by MCE) was added at a final concentration of 500 nM, and the P38/MAPK inhibitor SB202190 (manufactured by MCE) was added at a final concentration of 500 nM, to prepare a primary breast epithelial cell culture medium.

[0073] (2) Culture of Primary Breast Tumor Cells Derived from Breast Cancer Tissue and Normal Breast Epithelial Cells Derived from Paracancerous Tissue

[0074] Breast epithelial cells derived from cancer tissue and breast epithelial cells derived from paracancerous tissue were isolated respectively from the cancer tissue and the paracancerous breast tissue of the same breast cancer patient, using the same method as in step (1) of Example 1. The paracancerous breast tissue samples were collected from the breast tissue at least 5 cm away from the breast cancer tissue. Next, the breast tumor cells derived from cancer tissue were counted with a hemocytometer, and then inoculated at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well into a 12-well plate coated with Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences). 2 mL of the prepared primary breast epithelial cell culture medium was added to the 12-well plate, which was cultured at 37° C. under the conditions of 5% CO.sub.2 concentration and 20% oxygen concentration.

[0075] FIG. 1(A) shows a microscopy image (under a 50× inverted phase contrast microscope) of breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN11) which were isolated from a surgically resected breast tumor sample and cultured to day 7 after inoculation. Microscopic observation shows that the cultured primary breast tumor cells derived from the cancer tissue were of high purity and did not contain interstitial cells such as fibroblasts and the like. FIG. 1(B) shows a microscopy image (under a 50× inverted phase contrast microscope) of primary breast normal epithelial cells (HMFL-XN11-N) which were isolated from the paracancerous tissue samples of the same patient as HMFL-XN11, inoculated into a Matrigel-coated 12-well plate at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well and cultured to day 7 after inoculation. FIGS. 1(A) and 1(B) indicate that the use of the primary breast epithelial cell culture medium and culture method of the invention can achieve efficient culture in vitro for both breast tumor cells derived from breast cancer tissue and normal breast epithelial cells derived from paracancerous tissue. The cultured primary cells do not contain interstitial cells such as fibroblasts and the like.

[0076] FIGS. 1(C) and 1(D) are comparison of microscopy images (under a 100× inverted phase contrast microscope) of primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN15) cultured to day 4 after inoculation and cultured to day 10 after inoculation, respectively, wherein the primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN15) were isolated from another surgically resected breast cancer tissue samples and inoculated into a Matrigel-coated 12-well plate at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well. FIG. 1(D) shows that two different cell subpopulations which constitute the breast gland, i.e., luminal cells and myoepithelial cells, can be cultured by using the primary cell culture medium and the culture method of the invention, and thus, achieves an in vitro culture that can preserve the heterogeneity of tumor sample. Comparing FIGS. 1(C) and 1(D), it can be confirmed that the breast cancer tissue samples are isolated, inoculated, and cultured using the medium and the culture method of the invention, which results in the formation of obvious breast epithelial cell clones on day 4 after inoculation and culture, and the exponential expansion of cell number on day 10 of culture, suggesting that the technology of the invention is an efficient technology for expanding breast epithelial cells in vitro.

[0077] (3) Culture of Primary Breast Epithelial Cells Under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

[0078] The primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN30) derived from breast cancer tissue were isolated from the cancer tissue of a breast cancer patient, using the same method as step (1) of Example 1. Next, the primary breast tumor cells HMFL-XN30 with equal cell numbers (4×10.sup.4 cells/well) were inoculated into a Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences)-coated 12-well plate. 2 mL of the prepared primary breast epithelial cell culture medium was added to the 12-well plate, and equal numbers of breast tumor cells were cultured under the conditions of 20% oxygen concentration (normoxic condition) and 2% oxygen concentration (hypoxic condition), respectively. The micrograph photos (under a 100× inverted phase contrast microscope) were taken after cultured to day 7. FIGS. 1(E) and 1(F) are the comparison of cells obtained by culturing the breast epithelial cells derived from cancer tissue under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, respectively. From FIGS. 1(E) and 1(F), it can be confirmed that high-efficiency culture of the primary breast epithelial cells derived from cancer tissue can be achieved under both normoxic (20% oxygen concentration) and hypoxic conditions (2% oxygen concentration) when using the culture medium and the culture method of the invention.

[0079] (4) Comparison of the Culture Results of Primary Breast Tumor Cells Derived from Breast Cancer Tissue Under the Conditions of with and without Coating of Extracellular Matrix Gel

[0080] The primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN30, HMFL-XN22) derived from cancer tissues were isolated from the cancer tissues of two breast cancer patients, using the same method as step (1) of Example 1. Next, equal numbers (4×10.sup.4 cells/well) of the primary breast tumor cells HMFL-XN30 were inoculated into a Matrigel-coated (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences) 12-well plate and a 12-well plate without any treatment, respectively. 2 mL of the prepared primary breast epithelial cell culture mediums were added to the 12-well plates, and equal numbers of primary breast tumor cells were cultured under the condition of 20% oxygen concentration. After cultured to day 10, photographs were taken. HMFL-XN22 (P3) were breast tumor cells HMFL-XN22 that were continuously cultured to the third passage under the conditions of Matrigel-coated and without Matrigel-coated, respectively, after isolation. The remaining steps are the same as those of HMFL-XN30.

[0081] FIG. 2 are microscopy images of the breast cancer tissue-derived primary breast tumor cells HMFL-XN30 and HMFL-XN22 (P3) where were cultured to day 10 under the conditions of Matrigel-coated and without Matrigel-coated, respectively. According to FIG. 2, it can be confirmed that the culture plate coated with Matrigel is more favorable for the proliferation of breast tumor cells than the culture plate without any treatment.

Example 3

[0082] Proliferation Effect of Amphiregulin on Primary Breast Tumor Cells Derived from Breast Cancer Tissue

[0083] (1) A primary breast epithelial cell culture medium was prepared in the same manner as in step (1) of Example 2. In addition, another primary medium without amphiregulin was prepared by removing amphiregulin from the formulation of the primary breast epithelial cell culture medium.

[0084] (2) By using the same method as step (1) of Example 1, primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN2, HMFL-XN12) derived from surgically resected cancer tissue samples of two different breast cancer patients and primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN13) derived from a puncture sample of a breast cancer patient were obtained.

[0085] The primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN2) derived from surgically resected cancer tissue were inoculated at the same density (5×10.sup.4 cells/well) into a Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences)-coated 12-well plate. Cells were cultured at 37° C. and 20% oxygen concentration in the primary breast epithelial cell medium of the invention containing amphiregulin and the primary medium without amphiregulin, with two replicate wells per group. FIG. 3(A) shows the microscopy images (under a 100× inverted phase contrast microscope) of the tumor cell clones formed after culturing to day 6 in the primary culture medium without and with amphiregulin, wherein, the cultured cells (HMFL-XN2) were isolated from the same breast cancer patient and inoculated with the same cell numbers (5×10.sup.4 cells/well).

[0086] FIG. 3(B) shows the results of cell count for three cases of breast cancer tissue-derived breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN2, HMFL-XN-12 and HMFL-XN13), after culturing to day 10 in the primary culture medium without amphiregulin and with amphiregulin, respectively, with two replicate wells in each group. It can be seen from FIG. 3(B) that taking the group of the cells cultured in the culture medium without amphiregulin as a control, the addition of amphiregulin can promote the proliferation of the primary breast epithelial cells, which may promote the proliferation of the primary breast epithelial cells by at least 50% and up to 250%.

Example 4

[0087] Continuous culture of primary breast tumor cells derived from breast cancer tissue and drawing of the growth curve for the same

[0088] (1) The primary breast epithelial cell culture medium was prepared in the same manner as in step (1) of Example 2. As a control, another culture medium for cell conditional reprogramming technology (hereinafter also referred to as “cell conditional reprogramming medium”) was prepared. For the preparation steps, please refer to Liu et al., Nat Protoc., 12(2): 439-451, 2017. The formulation of the culture medium is shown in Table 2. In addition, as another control, a culture medium for breast gland organoids (hereinafter also referred to as “organoid medium”) was prepared. For the preparation steps, see Hans Clevers et al., Cell, 11; 172(1-2): 373-386, 2018, and the formulation of the culture medium is shown in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Composition of cell conditional reprogramming medium Medium composition Supplier Article number Final concentration DMEM medium Corning 10-013-CVR 65% Fetal bovine serum Gibco 16140-071 10% Ham's F12 Nutrient Gibco 11765-054 25% Mixture Hydrocortisone Sigma-Aldrich H-0888 25 ng/ml Epidermal growth R&D 236-EG 0.125 ng/ml factor Insulin Sigma-Aldrich I-5500 5 μg/ml Amphotericin B Sigma-Aldrich V900919 250 ng/ml Gentamicin Gibco 15710-064 10 μg/ml Cholera Toxin Sigma-Aldrich C8052 0.1 nM Y27632 Enzo 270-333M025 10 μM

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Composition of organoid medium Article Final Medium composition Supplier number concentration R-Spondin 1 conditioned prepared / 10% medium R-Spondin 3 recombinant R&D 3500-RS/CF 250 ng/ml protein Neuregulin 1 Peprotech 100-03 5 nM Fibroblast growth factor 7 Peprotech 100-19 5 ng/ml Fibroblast growth factor 10 Peprotech 100-26 20 ng/ml Epidermal growth factor Peprotech AF-100-15 5 ng/ml Noggin Peprotech 120-10C 100 ng/ml A83-01 Tocris 2939 500 nM Y-27632 Abmole Y-27632 5 mM SB202190 Sigma S7067 500 nM B27 Gibco 17504-44 1× N-Acetyl Cysteine Sigma A9165-5g 1.25 mM Nicotinamide Sigma NO636 5 mM Glutamine additive 100× Invitrogen 12634-034 1× Hepes buffer Invitrogen 15630-056 10 mM Penicillin/Streptomycin Invitrogen 15140-122 100 U/ml Primocin Invitrogen Ant-pm-1 50 mg/ml Advanced DMEM/F12 Invitrogen 12634-034 1× Medium

[0089] (2) By using the same method as step (1) of Example 1, the primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN12 and HMFL-XN21) derived from two cases of breast cancer tissues were obtained. Next, HMFL-XN12 and HMFL-XN21 were cultured at the same density (4×10.sup.4 cells/well) under the following three culture conditions:

[0090] A. The technology of the invention: the primary breast tumor cells were inoculated into a 12-well plate coated with Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences) at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well, cultured using 2 mL of the primary breast epithelial cell culture medium of the invention;

[0091] B. Cell conditional reprogramming technology: the primary breast tumor cells were inoculated onto a γ-ray irradiated mouse fibroblast cell line J2 cells (purchased from Kerafast) at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well, cultured in a 12-well plate using the cell conditional reprogramming medium (the detailed steps, see Liu et al., Am J Pathol, 183(6): 1862-1870, 2013);

[0092] C. The primary breast tumor cells were inoculated into a Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences)-coated 12-well plate at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well, and cultured in the 12-well plate using 2 mL of organoid medium.

[0093] In the above three cultures, the cells cultured under the three culture conditions wherein the mediums were renewed every 4 days.

[0094] (3) For the primary breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN12 and HMFL-XN21) cultured by the technology of the invention, when the growth of the cells in the culture plate covers about 80% of the bottom area of the plate, the supernatant of the culture medium in the 12-well plate was discarded, and 1 mL of 0.05% trypsin (Thermo Fisher: 25300062) was added to digest the cells; after incubating at 37° C. for 15 minutes, the digested cells were resuspended in 5 mL of DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 U/mL streptomycin, and the resultant was collected into a centrifuge tube for centrifuging at 350 g/min for 5 minutes; the centrifuged cell precipitations were resuspended in the culture medium of the invention, and the cells were count with a hemocytometer; the cells were inoculated at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well into another 12-well culture plate coated with extracellular matrix gel for further culture.

[0095] The cells cultured under the other two culture conditions were digested, passaged and counted in the same manner as above, and the cells were inoculated respectively according to step B or step C described in step (2) of Example 4.

[0096] When the passaged cells grew in the culture plate to cover about 80% of the bottom area of the plate again, the cultured cells were digested, collected and counted according to the above operating method. The cells were inoculated at a density of 4×10.sup.4 cells/well again and cultured continuously.

[0097] The following is the formula for calculating the cell population doubling number of primary breast epithelial cells under different culture conditions:

Cell population doubling number=[log(N/X.sub.0)]/log 2

where N is the number of cells for the passage and X.sub.0 is the number of cells at initial inoculation (see Greenwood et al., Environ Mol Mutagen 2004, 43(1): 36-44).

[0098] FIGS. 4(A) and 4(B) are the growth curves of two cases of cells under three different culture conditions drawn by Graphpad Prism7.0 software, which take the culture days as the abscissa and the cell population doubling number as the ordinate. From FIGS. 4(A) and 4(B), it can be confirmed that the proliferation rate of breast epithelial cells cultured by the technology of the invention is higher than that of the cell conditional reprogramming technology, and is comparative to that of the organoid culture technology.

[0099] The photos of the cells in FIG. 4(C) are a microscopy images (under a 50× inverted phase contrast microscope) of HMFL-XN21 cultured to the third passage (day 27) under three different culture conditions.

[0100] FIG. 5 is a comparison of the microscopy images (under a 100× inverted phase contrast microscope) of HMFL-XN12 cultured to day 9 and day 22 with the culture medium of the invention. It can be confirmed from FIG. 5 that the technology of the invention can continuously culture the primary breast epithelial cells, and the morphology of the cells after multiple passages and continuous culture does not change significantly compared with that before passage.

Example 5

[0101] Identification of Immune Markers of the Tumor Tissue-Derived Primary Breast Tumor Cell

[0102] (1) A primary breast tumor cell culture medium was prepared in the same manner as in step (1) of Example 2.

[0103] (2) Cancer tissue about the size of a soybean was taken from a surgical resection sample of a breast cancer patient, and immersed in 10 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde. Breast epithelial cells (HMFL-XN7) were obtained from the remaining cancer tissue in the same manner as in step (1) of Example 1. HMFL-XN7 was continuously cultured to the third passage using the same method as described in step (3) of Example 4.

[0104] (3) Immunofluorescence assay was used to detect the expression of important cancer-related biomarkers on human breast tumor cells. The primary antibodies used were CK8 (manufactured by Abcam), CK14 (manufactured by Abcam), ER (manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology), PR (manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology), HER2 (manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology), and Ki67 (manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology). The secondary antibodies used were Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L), F(ab′)2 Fragment (Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugate) (manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology), Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L), F(ab′)2 Fragment (Alexa Fluor® 594 Conjugate) (manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology). ER and PR are important indicators to predict whether the patients can accept the endocrine therapy; HER2 is an important indicator to predict whether the patients can accept anti-HER2 targeted therapy; Ki67 is an indicator to judge the malignancy and prognosis of breast cancer; CK8 and CK14 are biomarkers for epithelial cells, which are also used in the identification and diagnosis of breast cancer.

[0105] The breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN7) cultured to the third passage according to the technology of the invention were inoculated on a glass slide coated with Matrigel, and the coating method was the same as the step (2) of Example 1. The cells were cultured by using the primary breast epithelial cell culture medium of the invention, and the cells were grown on the glass slide. After being rinsed twice with PBS buffer, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes, and then incubated with 1% BSA, 1% Triton X-100 in TBST (TBS+0.1% Tween 20) at room temperature for one hour. The cells were rinsed with PBS buffer 3 times for 3 minutes each time. PBS solution was removed; 50 μL of the primary antibody diluent (prepared according to the antibody instructions) was dropped on the slide; the cells were incubated at room temperature for 60 minutes, and then rinsed 3 times with PBS for 3 minutes each time; the secondary antibody diluent (prepared according to the antibody instructions) was added dropwise; the cells were incubated at room temperature for 60 minutes, and then rinsed 3 times with PBS for 3 minutes each time. The cells were incubated with 1 μg/mL of DAPI dye (manufactured by Sigma) for 10 minutes, and then rinsed once with PBS. After sealing the coverslip with a drop of mounting medium (manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific), the expression of breast cancer-related biomarkers ER, PR, HER2, CK8, CK14 and Ki67 on the cells was photographed (under a 400× fluorescence microscope). The results were shown in FIG. 6(A). The results of immunofluorescence staining show that the number of ER(+), PR(+), HER2(−), and Ki67 positive cells in the breast epithelial cells cultured to the third passage by the technology of the invention was about 20%.

[0106] (4) The expression of important biomarkers related to the breast cancer in the original tissue, from which HMFL-XN7 cells were derived, was detected by immunohistochemistry. The tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into tissue sections of 4 μm thickness with a microtome. Routine immunohistochemical detection was then performed (for detailed steps, see Yu et al., Science, 345(6193): 216-220, 2014). The primary antibodies used were the same as those used in immunofluorescence. The expression of cancer-related biomarkers ER, PR, HER2, CK8, CK14 and Ki67 on the cells was photographed (under a 200× biological microscope), and the results are shown in FIG. 6(B). The immunohistochemistry results for the patient show that ER(+), PR(+), HER2(−), and Ki67 positive cell number was about 20%.

[0107] FIGS. 6(A) and 6(B) confirm that the expression of breast cancer-related biomarkers on the cells that were cultured from the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN7) by the technology of the invention to the third passage, was consistent with the expression of markers on the original tissue section from which the cells were derived. This suggests that the cells cultured by the technology of the invention maintain the original pathological characteristics of the cancer tissues of the breast cancer patients.

Example 6

[0108] Gene Mutation and Karyotype Analysis of Primary Breast Tumor Cells Derived from Cancer Tissue

[0109] (1) Gene mutation analysis: the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN10, HMFL-XN12) were continuously cultured by the method of the invention in accordance with step (3) of Example 4; the breast tumor cells (P3) cultured in vitro for the third passage and the non-passaged cancer tumor cells (P0) directly derived from the breast cancer patient were collected by centrifugation, and the genomic DNA of the cells was extracted using DNeasy blood & tissue kit (manufactured by QIAGEN). 2 mL of peripheral blood was collected from the patient who donates the cells, and the genomic DNA was extracted by the same method as a background control. Subsequently, whole-exome sequencing was performed on the genomic DNA of the cells and the blood samples (for detailed procedures, see Hans Clevers et al., Cell, 11; 172(1-2): 373-386, 2018), and the sequencing results were analyzed for tumor high-frequency mutated gene. The MuSiC software was used to analyze the high-frequency mutation of tumor. MuSiC took the gene mutation in the peripheral blood of the patient who donates the tumor sample as the background, performed statistical tests on each mutation type on the gene, and detected the gene with a significantly higher mutation rate than the background. The analysis results are shown in FIG. 7(A). The Venn diagrams in FIG. 7(A) show the alignments of the number of high-frequency mutation genes carried by breast tumor cells of different passages cultured by using the technology of the invention. HMFL-XN10 (P3) represents a high-frequency mutation analysis for the breast tumor cells from the breast cancer patient which have been cultured to the third passage by the culture method of the invention; HMFL-XN10 (P0) represents an analysis of initially isolated non-passaged breast tumor cells derived from the same breast cancer patient. The above analysis results were produced using the software available at https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html. The results of tumor high-frequency mutation analysis show that the high-frequency mutation genes of the two groups were substantially the same. HMFL-XN12 and HMFL-XN10 cells were operated in parallel using the same method. FIG. 7(A) confirms that the cancer tissue-derived breast tumor cells cultured by the technology of the invention can maintain the original gene mutation characteristics of the cancer tissue of the patient.

[0110] (2) Chromosome karyotype analysis: the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN10) were continuously cultured to the third passage (P3) using the same method of the invention according to step (3) of Example 4. One day before collection of the cells, 0.1 μg/mL of colchamine (manufactured by Gibco) was added to the culture medium; after 16 hours, the cells were digested, collected, and treated with 75 mM low-permeability KCl, and then were fixed with a 3:1 methanol:glacial acetic acid solution for 30 minutes. The fixed cells were evenly dropped on a glass slide and allowed to dry, and the cell nuclei were stained with 5 mg/ml DAPI (manufactured by Sigma) for 15 minutes; the cell metaphase were photographed by using a confocal laser microscope (purchased from Leica), and chromosomes were aligned in pairs.

[0111] FIG. 7(B) shows that the chromosomal morphology and number of breast tumor cells cultured to the third passage by using the technology of the invention for HMFL-XN10 are normal, without the appearance of polyploidy or hypoploidy; however, the chromosomes in the nucleus were duplicated twice, and several chromosomes were close to each other, which was consistent with the karyotype of tumor cells, suggesting that the cells have abnormal chromosomes and have tumor cell characteristics. FIG. 7(B) confirms that the cancer tissue-derived breast tumor cells cultured by the culture method of the invention can maintain the chromosome karyotype characteristics of the breast cancer patient.

Example 7

[0112] Xenograft Tumorigenesis Experiments of Cancer Tissue-Derived Primary Breast Tumor Cells in Mice

[0113] Breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN5, HMFL-XN29) were isolated and obtained from the cancer tissues of two cases of pathologically diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer patients by using the same method as step (1) in Example 1. HMFL-XN5 and HMFL-XN29 were cultured respectively according to the method of step (2) of Example 2, and when the number of breast tumor cells reached 1×10.sup.7, the breast tumor cells were digested and collected by using the same method of the invention as described in step (3) of Example 4. The breast tumor cell culture medium of the invention and Matrigel (registered trademark) (manufactured by BD Biosciences) were mixed at a ratio of 1:1, and 100 μL of the culture medium mixed with Matrigel was used to resuspend 5×10.sup.6 breast tumor cells, and the resultant was injected into the breast fat pad and the axilla of the right forelimb of 6-week-old female highly immunodeficient mice (NCG) (purchased from Nanjing Model Animal Research Center), respectively. The volume and growth rate of tumors in mice generated from the breast tumor cells were observed and photographed every three days.

[0114] FIG. 8 confirms that tumor formation can be observed in the two tumor cell inoculation sites of the mice on day 13 after tumor cell inoculation. From day 13 to day 22, the tumor proliferation in mice was obvious. This indicates that the cancer tissue-derived breast tumor cells cultured by the culture method of the invention have tumorigenicity in mice.

Example 8

[0115] Drug Sensitivity Functional Test of Cancer Tissue-Derived Breast Tumor Cells

[0116] Taking a surgical resection sample from a breast cancer patient as an example, it is verified that the breast tumor cells cultured from the patient-derived breast tumor samples can be used to test the sensitivity of the tumor cells of the patient to different drugs.

[0117] 1. Plating of primary breast tumor cells: the single cell suspension of breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN5, HMFL-XN7, HMFL-XN10, HMFL-XN12, and HMFL-XN29) obtained by the same method of the invention according to step (3) of Example 4, was inoculated at a density of 3000-5000 cells/well in a 384-well plate, and the cells were adhered overnight.

[0118] 2. Drug Gradient Experiments:

[0119] (1) The drug storage plates were prepared by gradient dilution method: 10 μL of the drug stock solutions to be tested (the concentration of the drug stock solution was determined based on 2 times of the maximum blood concentration Cmax of the drug in the human body) were respectively taken, and added to 0.5 mL EP tubes containing 20 μL of DMSO; 10 μL of solutions from the above EP tubes were pipetted into second 0.5 mL EP tubes loaded with 20 μL of DMSO, that is, diluting the drugs in a ratio of 1:3. The above method was repeated for gradually dilution and 7 concentrations required for dosing were obtained. Different concentrations of drugs were added to the 384-well drug storage plates. Equal volume of DMSO was added to each well of the solvent control group as a control. In this example, the drugs to be tested were epirubicin (manufactured by MCE), lapatinib (manufactured by MCE), docetaxel (manufactured by MCE), and tamoxifen (manufactured by MCE).

[0120] (2) Using a high-throughput automated workstation (purchased from Perkin Elmer), different concentrations of drugs and solvent controls in the 384-well drug storage plates were added to 384-well cell culture plates plated with the breast tumor cells. The drug groups and the solvent control groups were each arranged with 3 duplicate wells. The volume of drugs added to each well was 100 nL.

[0121] (3) Test of cell viability: 72 hours after administration, Cell Titer-Glo assay kit (manufactured by Promega) was used to detect the chemiluminescence value of the cultured cells after drug administration. The magnitude of the chemiluminescence value reflects the cell viability and the effect of the drug on the cell viability. The prepared Cell Titer-Glo detection solution was added to each well, and a microplate reader was used to detect the chemiluminescence value after mixing.

[0122] Graphs were made by using Graphpad Prism 7.0 software and the half-inhibition rate IC.sub.50 was calculated.

[0123] (4) The drug sensitivity testing results are shown in FIG. 9.

[0124] FIGS. 9(A) to 9(D) respectively represent the sensitivity of the breast tumor cells cultured from surgically resected cancer tissue samples of five different breast cancer patients to two chemotherapeutic drugs epirubicin and docetaxel, to endocrine therapy drug tamoxifen, and to targeted drug lapatinib. The results show that the cells from the same patient have different sensitivities to different drugs, and the cells from different patients also have different sensitivities to the same drug.

[0125] Specifically, the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN7) derived from a hormone receptor-positive, HER2 receptor-negative breast cancer patient were more sensitive to the endocrine therapy drug tamoxifen than other patients, with a half-inhibition rate of 0.98 μM; however, the sensitivity to the HER2-targeting drug lapatinib was lower, with a half-inhibition rate of 2.5 μM. The test results of the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN12) derived from a HER2-positive breast cancer patient show that the cells were more sensitive to the anti-HER2 targeting drug lapatinib than other patients, with a half-inhibitory amount of 0.92 μM. In addition, the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN29) derived from a triple-negative breast cancer patient were less sensitive to the endocrine therapy drug tamoxifen and the anti-HER2 targeting drug lapatinib than the breast tumor cells from other patients. On the other hand, the breast tumor cells (HMFL-XN5) from another triple-negative breast cancer patient were sensitive to none of the four testing drugs.

[0126] FIG. 9 confirms that the sensitivity test results of the breast tumor cells, which were cultured by the invention from the cancer tissues of breast cancer patients, to chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted drugs, were consistent with the clinicopathological molecular typing of the patients, suggesting that the breast tumor cells cultured by the technology of the invention have potential uses in predicting the clinical efficacy of the breast cancer patients.

[0127] Although the invention has been described in details above with general description and specific embodiments, some modifications or improvements can be made on the basis of the invention, which would be obvious to those skilled in the art. Therefore, these modifications or improvements made without departing from the spirit of the invention should be within the protection scope of the invention.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0128] The invention provides a culture medium and a culture method for culturing or expanding primary breast epithelial cells in vitro. The cell models obtained from the culture medium and the culture method of primary breast epithelial cells of the invention can be used to evaluate or screen the drugs for treating breast diseases.