Controlling the texture of high-protein nutritional compositions comprising micellar casein

Abstract

Medical dairy products are highly concentrated in proteins and minerals. Formulation of such products is challenging, since viscosities can easily increase during processing and storage. It was found that using one or more chelating agents selected from the group consisting of a phosphoric acid, citric acid, a soluble phosphate salt, a soluble citrate salt, or a mixture thereof, the viscosity and the transparency of an aqueous micellar casein composition, comprising 6 to 20 g/100 ml of micellar casein and having a pH of about 6 to 8 could be controlled independently of each other. It was found that products become more viscous after addition of phytate, citrate, or orthophosphate, and that the viscosity depends on concentration and type of phosphate. Addition of hexametaphosphate leads to gel formation. In contrast, high concentrations of uridine monophosphate can be added without significantly affecting the viscosity.

Claims

1. A liquid nutritional composition comprising: (a) 9 to 20 g of protein per 100 ml of the composition and having a pH of about 6 to 8, in which 70-100% of said protein comprises micellar casein, and (b) about 20 to 120 mEq.L.sup.1 of one or more chelating agents selected from the group consisting of a phosphoric acid, citric acid, cytidine monophosphate, orthophosphate, inositol hexaphosphate, hexametaphosphate, a soluble citrate salt, and mixtures thereof.

2. The liquid nutritional composition according to claim 1, wherein the one or more chelating agents are selected from the group consisting of orthophosphate, inositol hexaphosphate, hexametaphosphate, and a mixture thereof.

3. The liquid nutritional composition according to claim 1, wherein the one or more chelating agents are selected from the group consisting of disodium cytidine monophosphate, disodium orthophosphate, dodecasodium inositol hexaphosphate, hexasodium hexametaphosphate, trisodium citrate, and mixtures thereof.

4. The liquid nutritional composition according to claim 1, wherein the chelating agent is selected from the group consisting of a phosphoric acid, citric acid, orthophosphate, inositol hexaphosphate, hexametaphosphate, a soluble citrate salt, and mixtures thereof.

5. The liquid nutritional composition according to claim 1, further comprising one or more of fat, digestible carbohydrates and non-digestible carbohydrates.

6. A nutritional composition comprising: (a) 9 to 20 g of protein per 100 ml of the composition and having a pH of about 6 to 8, in which 70-100% of said protein comprises micellar casein, and (b) 20 to 120 mEq.L.sup.1 of one or more chelating agents selected from the group consisting of cytidine monophosphate, orthophosphate, inositol hexaphosphate, hexametaphosphate, citrate, and a mixture thereof, wherein citric acid, a soluble citrate salt or a mixture thereof is excluded as the sole chelating agent.

7. The nutritional composition according to claim 6, wherein the one or more chelating agents are selected from the group consisting of disodium cytidine monophosphate, disodium orthophosphate, dodecasodium inositol hexaphosphate, hexasodium hexametaphosphate, trisodium citrate, and a mixture thereof.

8. The nutritional composition according to according to claim 6, comprising about 20 to 100 mEq.L.sup.1 of the one or more chelating agents.

9. The nutritional composition according to claim 6, comprising one or more of fat, digestible and non-digestible carbohydrates.

10. The nutritional composition according to claim 6, wherein the composition is a liquid composition.

11. A method of providing nutrition to a person in need thereof, comprising administering to the person a liquid nutritional composition comprising: (a) 9 to 20 g of protein per 100 ml of the composition and having a pH of about 6 to 8, in which 70-100% of said protein comprises micellar casein, and (b) about 20 to 120mEq.L.sup.1 of one or more chelating agents selected from the group consisting of a phosphoric acid, citric acid, cytidine monophosphate, orthophosphate, inositol hexaphosphate, hexametaphosphate, a soluble citrate salt, and mixtures thereof.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the person is an elderly person, a person that is in a disease state, a person that is recovering from a disease state, a person that is malnourished, or a healthy person such as a sportsman or sportswoman or an active elderly.

13. A method of providing nutrition to a person in need thereof, comprising administering to the person a nutritional composition according to claim 6.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the person is an elderly person, a person that is in a disease state, a person that is recovering from a disease state, a person that is malnourished, or a healthy person such as a sportsman or sportswoman or an active elderly.

Description

LIST OF FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1: Salt equilibria between free calcium ions, calcium chelator complexes, and casein micelles in dairy systems. Chelators in this study are Na.sub.2UMP, Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, SHMP, SP, and TSC.

(2) FIG. 2: Calcium ion activity of 9% w/v MCI solution as function of phosphate and citrate concentration. Symbols represent: (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2UMP; (.diamond-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC.

(3) FIG. 3: Viscosity at shear rate 50 s.sup.1 of 9% w/v MCI solution as function of phosphate and citrate concentration. Symbols represent: (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2UMP; (.diamond-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC.

(4) FIG. 4: Voluminosity, calculated with Eilers equation, at shear rate 50 s.sup.1 of 9% w/v MCI solution as function of phosphate and citrate concentration. Symbols represent: (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2UMP; (.diamond-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC.

(5) FIG. 5: Amount of ultracentrifuged pellet of 9% w/v MCI solution as function of phosphate and citrate concentration. Symbols represent: (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2UMP; (.diamond-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC.

(6) FIG. 6: Amount of protein in ultracentrifuged pellet of 9% w/v MCI solution as function of phosphate and citrate concentration. Symbols represent: (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2UMP; (.diamond-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC.

(7) FIG. 7: Correlation between voluminosities based on viscosity and ultracentrifugation measurements. Symbols represent: (D) Na.sub.2UMP; (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC; () x=y.

(8) FIG. 8: Turbidity of 9% w/v MCI solution diluted to 10% of their initial dry matter in demineralized water as function of phosphate and citrate concentration. Symbols represent: (.circle-solid.) Na.sub.2UMP; (.diamond-solid.) Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4; (.square-solid.) SHMP (.box-tangle-solidup.) SP; (x) TSC.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

(9) The calcium-ion activity decreases upon addition of the phosphates and citrate (FIG. 2), because calcium ions are chelated from the serum phase and casein micelles. A comparable decrease in calcium-ion activity was measured for SHMP, SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4. The viscosity increased to a comparable extent after addition of SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 (FIG. 3). The largest increase in viscosity was measured for SHMP samples, which is due to the ability of SHMP to cross-link caseins (Kocak & Zadow, 1985; Mizuno & Lucey, 2007; Vujicic et al., 1968). This resulted in gel formation upon addition of more than 45 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 SHMP. The calcium-ion activity only slightly decreased upon addition of Na.sub.2UMP, because Na.sub.2UMP is a weak calcium binder (De Kort et al., 2009). Accordingly, the viscosity was negligibly affected.

(10) The viscosity values (at a shear rate of 50 s.sup.1) were inserted in the formula of Eilers to calculate the voluminosity of the casein micelle. The solutions were shear thinning at higher chelator concentrations (75 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 for SP, TSC and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 and 45 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 for SHMP), when higher viscosities were measured. This seems to make interpretation via viscosities at 50 s.sup.1 ambiguous. However, in this region of high viscosity, the sensitivity of the volume fraction calculated from Eilers' equation to the actual viscosity value is low: volume fractions are close to the value .sub.max for maximum packing. The results in FIG. 4 show that the casein micelle in a 9% w/v MCI solution has a voluminosity of 4.5 mL.Math.g.sup.1. Walstra et al. (2006) measured a voluminosity of 4 mL.Math.g.sup.1 for casein micelles in milk. Addition of Na.sub.2UMP had a negligible effect on the voluminosity of the casein micelle. Higher volume fractions were calculated for SHMP samples than for the other phosphates and citrate because of gelling of the SHMP samples. For SHMP samples, accordingly, the voluminosity of the casein micelle cannot be deduced from the viscosity via Eilers' equation, because interactions between the micelles are no longer only of hydrodynamic nature. The effect of SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 on viscosity and thus the derived voluminosity were comparable. The voluminosity of the casein micelle increased from 4.5 mL.Math.g.sup.1 (=0.41) to approximately 7.5 mL.Math.g.sup.1 (=0.69) upon addition of 105 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 SP, TSC, or Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4. Addition of SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 neither cross-linked casein micelles nor caused gelation in the studied concentration range, which is in agreement with the behavior of TSC in milk (Mizuno & Lucey, 2005).

(11) The voluminosity of the casein micelle can also be deduced from ultracentrifuged fractions by dividing the total pellet volume by the amount of protein in the pellet. The amount of pellet and amount of protein in the pellet after ultracentrifugation are shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, respectively. The amount of ultracentrifuged pellet is influenced by the time and acceleration of centrifugation, the density and viscosity of the solutions, and the density and size of the casein micelles. The amount of CCP, caseins, and water present in the micelles contributes to the density of the micelles (Lin et al., 1972): the more CCP and caseins are present in (intact) casein micelles and the lower the viscosity, the more easily the micelles precipitate in the pellet. Approximately 30 w/w % pellet was formed with ultracentrifugation for 1 h of 9% w/v MCI and this pellet contained 7.5 w/w % protein. The amount of pellet and the amount of protein in the pellet decreased upon addition of TSC, SP, and SHMP, whereas the amount of pellet increased and the amount of protein in the pellet slightly decreased upon addition of Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 and Na.sub.2UMP.

(12) FIG. 7 shows the correlation between voluminosities calculated from viscosity and ultracentrifugation measurements. In general, the voluminosities obtained from ultracentrifugation underestimate the voluminosities obtained from viscosity because of compression of the hairy outer layer of the micelles in the pellet. This was also observed by Dewan et al. (1972) and Van Hooydonk et al. (1986). The voluminosities correlate for TSC, SP, Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, and Na.sub.2UMP samples. For SHMP samples, they correlate up to 15 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 SHMP, but start to deviate at higher SHMP concentrations. This is due to the high viscosities measured in SHMP samples. The voluminosity of the casein micelle calculated via viscosity measurements is overestimated in SHMP samples, because the caseins were cross-linked. The amount of ultracentrifuged pellet is also lower at higher viscosity. Therefore, the voluminosity of the casein micelle in SHMP samples cannot be calculated either via viscosity or via ultracentrifugation.

(13) Calcium chelators also affect the turbidity of milk solutions (Odagiri & Nickerson, 1964). The turbidity of the 9% w/v micellar casein solution decreased upon addition of the phosphates and citrate in the order SHMP > SP> TSC > Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4> Na.sub.2UMP (FIG. 8). Mizuno & Lucey (2005) also observed a decrease in turbidity in the order SHMP > TSC > Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 in samples prepared from milk protein concentrate at pH 5.8. The turbidity decreased to a comparable extent after addition of 45 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 SP or SHMP, whereas large differences in viscosity were measured for these samples. This implies that SHMP has the ability to cross-link caseins in this concentration range, whereas SP does not. Our hypothesis is that this is due to the form and charge distribution around the molecules. SHMP has six homogeneously distributed negative charges around its molecule, whereas SP has twelve negative charges, clustered in pairs, around its molecule. This homogeneous charge distribution enables SHMP to interact with cations and the caseins at the same time. SP can approach the caseins less easily than SHMP because of the charge distribution around the SP molecule and, in this way, cross-linking is inhibited. SP also is a very strong calcium chelator and might immediately chelate free calcium ions to such an extent that no charges or calcium ions are any longer available for cross-linking the caseins. This was measured as a stronger decrease in calcium-ion activity for SP than SHMP (FIG. 2). Mizuno and Lucey (2007) investigated the cross-linking ability of tetrasodium pyrophosphate (TSPP) in milk protein concentrate solution. They suggested that calcium pyrophosphate complexes cross-link caseins or reduce electrostatic repulsion between caseins, which facilitates hydrophobic association. TSPP probably cross-links the caseins more easily than SHMP, as it has only four homogeneously distributed charges around its molecule. Nevertheless, further research is required to elucidate the exact mechanism of cross-linking caseins by different polyphosphates.

(14) It is remarkable that SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 demonstrate a comparable increase in viscosity and voluminosity and decrease in calcium-ion activity, while these chelators have a different impact on turbidity and ultracentrifuged (protein in) pellet. Calcium ions in the casein micelle are bound to the phosphoserine residues or are part of the CCP complexes. The added chelator competes with the phosphoserine residues and CCP in the casein micelle for the calcium ions. Due to the differences in affinity for calcium ions of SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 (De Kort et al., 2009; Mekmene, Le Graet & Gaucheron, 2009; Turner, Paphazy, Haygarth & Mckelvie, 2002; Upreti, Buhlmann & Metzger, 2006), the chelators are able to release different amounts of CCP from the micelle. This does not necessarily affect the integrity of the micellar structure, because hydrophobic interactions between caseins that surround the CCP clusters prevent the micelles from complete dissociation when CCP is solubilized (Mcmahon & Oommen, 2007; Munyua & Lars son-Raznikiewicz, 1980).

(15) In general, scattering of particles is determined by the concentration, particle size, and refractive index relative to that of the solution (Van De Hulst, 1957). The caseins and CCP are mainly responsible for the light scattering properties of the casein micelle (Munyua & Larsson-Raznikiewicz, 1980). Removal of CCP from the micelles reduces the refractive index of the casein micelles, which is measured as a decrease in turbidity of the milk solutions. The study of Smiddy, Martin, Kelly, & De Kruif (2006) on internally cross-linked casein micelles showed that after addition of 50 mmol.Math.L.sup.1 citrate (150 mEq.Math.L.sup.1) to skim milk a decrease in light scattering of approximately 50% was measured. These authors suggested that all CCP (7% of dry mass of the casein micelle) was removed from the cross-linked micelles at this concentration, while the micellar structure remained intact. We measured a decrease in turbidity of 97% for SHMP and SP, 87% for TSC, and 60% for Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 upon addition of 105 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 chelator to 9 w/v % MCI solution (FIG. 8). Hence, these decreases in turbidity cannot only be attributed to release of CCP from the micelle. Some specific casein may also be released from the casein micelle upon removal of calcium and CCP from the micelle. Only a slight decrease in the amount of protein in the pellet was measured for Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 samples (FIG. 6), whereas a much larger decrease in amount of protein in the pellet was measured for SP and TSC samples. However, the viscosity of Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 samples increased to comparable extents as the viscosity of TSC and SP samples. This illustrates that the difference in decrease in turbidity for SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 samples cannot be explained by the release of only CCP and some specific caseins from the micelles. Hence, the change in refractive index and concentration of particles is not sufficient to cause the strong decrease in turbidity. Rayleigh scattering indicates that the intensity of the scattered light varies as the sixth power of the particle size (Van De Hulst, 1957) and accordingly particle size makes the main contribution to the change in turbidity of the solution. The particle size of the casein micelles is affected, when the micelles swell or dissociate into smaller structures. Huppertz (2007) described that addition of 6 mol.Math..sup.1 urea to internally cross-linked casein micelles induces swelling of the micelles, which is measured as a decrease in turbidity of 40%. The decrease in turbidity in our MCI samples is too large to be only attributed to the swelling of the casein micelles. A further explanation on the swelling of the casein micelles will be described hereafter. The major decrease in turbidity is most likely due to the dissociation of the casein micelles into smaller structures. Dissociated micelles will precipitate less easily than intact casein micelles during ultracentrifugation, because the fragments of the dissociated micelles are smaller and lighter than the intact casein micelles. Based on these phenomena, the turbidity and ultracentrifugation results indicate that micellar dissociation occurred to the largest extent for addition of SHMP and SP, followed by TSC and finally by Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4. Micellar dissociation most probably did not occur in Na.sub.2UMP samples.

(16) Nevertheless, a comparable voluminosity can be deduced for the addition of SP, TSC, or Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 in solutions containing dissociated or intact casein micelles, because the total volume per gram of protein is unchanged. This indicates that e.g. the voluminosity of the intact micelle in a Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 solution is comparable to the voluminosity of the dissociated micelle in a SP solution as long as the calcium-ion activities are comparable in both solutions. As a result, a comparable increase in viscosity and voluminosity of the casein micelle was measured for SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 samples. The phenomenon of milk solutions containing intact and dissociated casein micelles upon addition of polyphosphate or EDTA was introduced previously by e.g. Lin et al. (1972), Griffin et al. (1988), Panouill et al. (2005) and Pitkowski et al. (2009).

(17) As mentioned, the casein micelles will also swell upon addition of calcium chelators. FIG. 2 shows that the calcium-ion activity decreased to a comparable extent upon addition of SHMP, SP, TSC, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4. The electrostatic repulsion in the casein micelles increased because of the decrease in free calcium ions in the continuous phase. Consequently, the casein micelles became more hydrated and swelled, which is measured as an increase in viscosity of the MCI solutions (FIG. 3) and also an increase in voluminosity of the casein micelle (FIGS. 4 and 7). The phenomenon of swelling of the casein micelles can be derived from the ultracentrifuged pellet in Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 samples (FIG. 5). In these samples the pellet volume increased at higher chelator concentrations, whereas in SHMP, SP, or TSC samples the pellet volume decreased. The density, molecular weight, and size of the casein micelles are important for the amount of ultracentrifuged pellet obtained and are determined by the amount of casein, CCP, and water present in the casein micelles (Walstra et al., 2006). Gaucher et al. (2007) and Guo et al. (2003) observed that orthophosphate precipitates with calcium in the casein micelles. For example, an amount of approximately 3 g Ca.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 can be formed upon addition of 60 mEq.Math.L.sup.1 Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, of which a large part of the calcium ions are already part of the casein micelles. The increase in molecular weight is negligible in comparison to the observed increase in amount of pellet. This increase is ascribed to the swelling of the caseins. FIG. 5 also shows that the casein micelle slightly swells upon addition of Na.sub.2UMP, because the amount of pellet increased in these samples as well. These findings of swelling of the micelles upon addition of EDTA were not observed by Lin et al. (1972) and Pitkowski et al. (2009). They both described that at certain EDTA concentrations only a fraction of the micelles dissociated, but that the hydrodynamic radius of the residual casein micelles remained constant. However, Sood & Gaind (1979) already questioned the observations of Lin et al. (1972) that intact micelles will remain at a constant radius, because they measured an increase in voluminosity upon addition of EDTA. Therefore, they concluded that the micelles should be able to swell or shrink when the calcium content in the casein micelles is changed. Moreover, Huppertz et al. (2007) showed by three light scattering methods that even internally cross-linked casein micelles were able to swell upon addition of citrate or urea, which was measured as an increase in particle sizes and decrease in turbidity. These results are in line with our observations that addition of calcium chelators will induce swelling of the intact casein micelles and dissociation of a fraction of the micelles. This also suggests that loosely bound calcium, i.e. bound to the negatively charged amino acids side chains and phosphate groups, is present in the casein micelle besides strongly bound calcium in the CCP complexes. The former type has a structural function and its release is related to swelling of the micelle, which is measured as an increase in viscosity. Release of the latter is related to the dissociation of the casein micelles, which is measured as a decrease in turbidity and amount of ultracentrifuged pellet. The hypothesis that two types of calcium interactions are present in the casein micelle was proposed by Munyua & Larsson-Raznikiewicz (1980). Overall, it seems that the calcium-ion activity is a good predictor for the observed viscosities and voluminosities, but a poor indicator when the casein micelle starts to dissociate.

CONCLUSION

(18) Calcium chelators induce physical changes in concentrated micellar casein solutions by affecting the microstructure of the casein micelles. Addition of Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, TSC, and SP caused a comparable increase in viscosity of the MCI solutions, whereas the turbidity decreased in the order SP> TSC > Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4. Addition of SP or SHMP gave a comparable decrease in turbidity, but the viscosity of SHMP samples was much higher. This is due to the ability of SHMP to cross-link casein micelles. The calcium-ion activity decreased to a comparable extent upon addition of SHMP, SP, TSC, or Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, which induced swelling of the casein micelles.

(19) The voluminosity of the casein micelle (i.e. swelling) could be calculated from the viscosity and ultracentrifugation measurements for addition of SP, TSC, Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, and Na.sub.2UMP. The voluminosities obtained from the two calculation methods correlate for these samples. The voluminosity of the casein micelle in SHMP samples could not be derived from viscosity and ultracentrifugation results because of the cross-links formed between the caseins. The weak calcium chelator Na.sub.2UMP had a negligible effect on the viscosity and turbidity of the MCI solution and only slightly decreased the calcium-ion activity. The decrease in calcium-ion activity was predictive for the increase in viscosity and related swelling of the micelle until the micelle starts to dissociate. This confirms the hypothesis that two types of calcium interactions are present in the casein micelle. The extent of micellar dissociation is dependent on the type and concentration of added calcium chelator.

REFERENCES

(20) de Kort, E. J. P., M. Minor, T. H. M. Snoeren, A. C. M. van Hooijdonk, and E. van der Linden. 2009. Calcium binding capacity of organic and inorganic ortho- and polyphosphates. Journal of dairy science and technology. 89:283-299. Dewan, R. K., V. A. Bloomfield, A. chudgar, and C. V. Morr. 1972. Viscosity and voluminosity of bovine milk casein micelles. J. Dairy Sci. 56(6):699-705. Eilers, H. (1941). Die Viskositat von emulsionen hochviskoser stoffe als funktion der konzentration. Kolloid Zeitschrift. Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche und technische kolloidchemie, 96, 313-321. Eilers, H. 1945. Colloidchemische studien aan ondermelk. Vol. 50, 15. Koninklijke Nederlandse Zuivelbond, 's-Gravenhage. Fox, K. K., M. K. Harper, V. H. Holsinger, and M. J. Pallansch. 1965. Gelation of milk solids by orthophosphate. J. Dairy Sci. 48:179-185. Gaucher, I., Piot, M., Beaucher, E., & Gaucheron, F. (2007). Physico-chemical characterization of phosphate-added skim milk. International Dairy Journal, 17, 1375-1383. Griffin, M. C. A., Lyster, R. L. J., & Price, J. C. (1988). The disaggregation of calcium-depleted casein micelles. European Journal of Biochemistry, 174, 339-343. Griffin, M. C. A., Price, J. C., & Griffins, W. G. (1989). Variation of the viscosity of a concentrated, sterically stabilized, colloid: effect of ethanol on casein micelles of bovine milk. Journal of colloid and interface science, 128 (1), 223-229. Guo, C., B. E. Campbell, K. Chen, A. M. Lenhoff, and O. D. Velev. 2003. Casein precipitation equilibria in the presence of calcium ions and phosphates. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 29:297-307. Hallstrom, M. and P. Dejmek. 1988. Rheological properties of ultrafiltered skim milk. II. Protein voluminosity. Milchwissenschaft. 43(2):95-97. Harwalkar, V. R. 1982. Chapter 7: Age gelation of sterilised milks. Pages 229-269 in Developments in dairy chemistry. Vol. 1. P. F. Fox, ed. Applied Science Publishers, London. Huppertz, T., Smiddy, M. A., & De Kruif, C. G. (2007). Biocompatible micro-gel particles from cross-linked casein micelles. Biomacromolecules, 8, 1300-1305. Holt, C. 1997. The milk salts and their interaction with casein. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. 3:233-256.Karlsson, A. O., R. Ipsen, K. Schrader, and Y. Ardo. 2005. Relationship between physical properties of casein micelles and rheology of skim milk concentrate. J. Dairy Sci. 88:3784-3797. Kocak, H. R. and J. G. Zadow. 1985. Controlling age gelation of UHT milk with additives. The australian journal of dairy technology. 40:58-64. Korolczuk, J. (1981). Voluminosity and viscosity of casein solution I. The correlation between the voluminosity, protein concentration and viscosity. Milchwissenschaft, 36 (7), 414-416. Krieger, I. M. (1972). Rheology of monodisperse latices. Advances in colloid and interface science, 3, 111-136. Leviton, A. and M. J. Pallansch. 1962. High-temperature-short time-sterilised evaporated milk. IV. The retardation of gelation with condensed phosphates, manganous ions, polyhydric compounds, and phosphatides. J. Dairy Sci. 45:1045-1056. Lin, S. H. C., Leong, S. L., Dewan, R. K., Bloomfield, V. A., & Morr, C. V. (1972). Effect of calcium ion on the structure of native bovine casein micelles. Biochemistry, 11 (10), 1818-1821. Marchin, S., Puteaux, J.-L., Pignon, F., & Lonil, J. (2007). Effects of the environmental factors on the casein micelle structure studied by cryo transmission electron microscopy and small-angle x-ray scattering/ultrasmall-angle x-ray scattering. The journal of chemical physics, 126 (045101). McMahon, D. J., & Oommen, B. S. (2007). Supramolecular structure of the casein micelle. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 1709-1721. Mekmene, O., Le Graet, Y., & Gaucheron, F. (2009). A model for predicting salt equilibria in milk and mineral-enriched milks. Food Chemistry, 116, 233-239. Mizuno, R. and J. A. Lucey. 2005. Effects of emulsifying salts on the turbidity and calcium-phosphate-protein interactions in casein micelles. J. Dairy Sci. 88:3070-3078. Mizuno, R. and J. A. Lucey. 2007. Properties of milk protein gels formed by phosphates. J. Dairy Sci. 90:4524-4531. Morr, C. V. 1967. Some effects of pyrophosphate and citrate ions upon the colloidal caseinate-phosphate micelles and ultrafiltrate of raw and heated skimmilk. J. Dairy Sci. 50:1038-1044. Munyua, J. K., & Larsson-Raznikiewicz, M. (1980). The influence of Ca.sup.2+ on the size and light scattering properties of casein micelles 1. Ca.sup.2+ removal. Milchwissenschaft, 35 (10), 604-606. Odagiri, S., & Nickerson, T. A. (1964). Complexing of calcium by hexametaphosphate, oxalate, citrate, and EDTA in milk. I. Effects of complexing agents of turbidity and rennet coagulation. Journal of Dairy Science, 47, 1306-1309. Panouill, M., Nicolai, T., Benyahia, L., & Durand, D. (2005). Aggregation and gelation of casein sub-micelles. Special publicationRoyal society of chemistry, 298, 194-208. Philippe, M., F. Gaucheron, Y. Le Graet, F. Michel, and A. Garem. 2003. Physicochemical characterisation of calcium-supplemented skim milk. Lait. 83:45-59. Pitkowski, A., Nicolai, T., & Durand, D. (2009). Scattering and turbidity study of the dissociation of casein by calcium chelation. Biomacromolecules, 9, 369-375. Smiddy, M. A., Martin, J.-E. G. H., Kelly, A. L., De Kruif, C. G., & Huppertz, T. (2006). Stability of casein micelles cross-linked by transglutaminase. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1906-1914. Snoeren, T. H. M., Damman, A. J., & Klok, H. J. (1982). The viscosity of skim-milk concentrates. Netherlands milk and dairy journal, 36, 305-316. Sood, S. M., & Gaind, D. K. (1979). Correlation between micelle solvation and calcium content. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology, 14, 32-34. Turner, B. L., M. J. Paphazy, P. M. Haygarth, and I. D. McKelvie. 2002. Inositol phosphates in the environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 357:449-469. Udabage, P., McKinnon, I. R., & Augustin, M.-A. (2000). Mineral and casein equilibria in milk: effects of added salts and calcium-chelating agents. Journal of Dairy Research, 67, 361-370. Upreti, P., P. Buhlmann, and L. E. Metzger. 2006. Influence of calcium and phosphorus, lactose and salt-to moisture ratio on cheddar cheese quality: pH buffering properties of cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 89:938-950. Van de Hulst, H. C. (1957). Light scattering in small particles. New York, USA: Wiley. van Hooydonk, A. C. M., Hagedoorn, H. G., & Boerrigter, I. J. (1986). pH-induced physico-chemical changes of casein micelles in milk and their effect on renneting. 1. Effect of acidification on physico-chemical properties. Netherlands milk and dairy journal, 40, 281-296. Vujicic, I., J. M. deMan, and I. L. Woodrow. 1968. Interaction of polyphosphates and citrate with skimmilk proteins. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal. 1:17-21. Walstra, P., J. T. M. Wouters, and T. J. Geurts. 2006. Dairy science and technology. 2 ed. CRC press, Boc Raton, USA. Ward, B. R., Goddard, S. J., Augustin, M.-A., & McKinnon, I. R. (1997). EDTA-induced dissociation of casein micelles and its effect on foaming properties of milk. Journal of Dairy Research, 64, 495-504. Zittle, C. A. 1966. Precipitation of casein from acidic solutions by divalent anions. J. Dairy Sci. 49:361-364.