FILTER FOR LASER PROTECTION

20190107656 ยท 2019-04-11

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A method of forming a conformable filter, comprising the steps of: selecting at least a first wavelength corresponding to a predetermined laser threat; providing a conformable photosensitive film (320) and exposing said film to radiation from a focused laser source (100) of said first wavelength to create a first filter region therein configured to substantially block incident radiation thereon substantially only of said first wavelength while substantially allowing other visible wavelengths to be transmitted; selecting a bandwidth corresponding to a first predetermined wavelength band including said first wavelength and exposing said polymeric film (320) to radiation from one or more further laser sources of respective different wavelengths within said first predetermined wavelength band to create a notch filter region therein, including said first filter region, said notch filter region being configured to substantially block incident radiation thereon at a wavelength within said first predetermined wavelength band whilst substantially allowing visible wavelengths outside of said first predetermined wavelength band to be transmitted therethrough.

    Claims

    1. A method of forming a conformable filter, comprising the steps of: selecting at least a first wavelength corresponding to a predetermined laser threat; providing a conformable photosensitive film having a visible light transmission and exposing said film to radiation from a focused laser source of said first wavelength to create a first filter region therein configured to substantially block incident radiation thereon substantially only of said first wavelength while substantially allowing other visible wavelengths to be transmitted; selecting a bandwidth corresponding to a first predetermined wavelength band including said first wavelength and exposing said polymeric film to radiation from one or more further laser sources of respective different wavelengths within said first predetermined wavelength band to create a notch filter region therein, including said first filter region, said notch filter region being configured to substantially block incident radiation thereon at a wavelength within said first predetermined wavelength band whilst substantially allowing visible wavelengths outside of said first predetermined wavelength band to be transmitted therethrough.

    2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said film is formed of a photosensitive polymer material.

    3. The method according to claim 1, wherein said film has a visible light transmission of at least 85%, and/or a thickness of 1 to 100 micrometers.

    4. A conformable filter formed by: selecting at least a first wavelength corresponding to a predetermined laser threat; providing a conformable photosensitive film having a visible light transmission and exposing said film to radiation from a focused laser source of said first wavelength to create a first filter region therein configured to substantially block incident radiation thereon substantially only of said first wavelength while substantially allowing other visible wavelengths to be transmitted; selecting a bandwidth corresponding to a first predetermined wavelength band including said first wavelength and exposing said polymeric film to radiation from one or more further laser sources of respective different wavelengths within said first predetermined wavelength band to create a notch filter region therein, including said first filter region, said notch filter region being configured to substantially block incident radiation thereon at a wavelength within said first predetermined wavelength band whilst substantially allowing visible wavelengths outside of said first predetermined wavelength band to be transmitted therethrough.

    5. The conformable filter according to claim 4, additionally configured to prevent transmission of radiation in a second predetermined wavelength band covering a selected second predetermined laser threat.

    6. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the first predetermined wavelength band covers or is centred on 532 nm.

    7. The filter according to claim 5 wherein the second predetermined wavelength band covers or is centred on 445 nm.

    8. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the filter is additionally configured to prevent radiation in a third predetermined wavelength band covering the wavelength of a third predetermined laser threat, and optionally wherein the third predetermined wavelength band covers or is centred on 650 nm.

    9. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the filter is configured to prevent radiation from three or more predetermined wavelength bands.

    10. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the filter is comprised of a single layer of material adapted or configured for preventing the transmission of the predetermined visible wavelength band or bands.

    11. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the bandwidth of at least one of the predetermined wavelength bands is between 10 nm and 5 nm.

    12. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the filter has an optical density of at least 2 at the first, and/or each, predetermined wavelength band.

    13. The filter according to claim 4, wherein the filter is provided as a conformal film for coupling to a window.

    14. The multi-layered window comprising a filter according to claim 4, wherein the filter is interposed between layers of the window.

    15. The window for a vehicle, the window comprising a filter according to claim 4.

    Description

    [0020] These and other aspects of the present invention will be apparent from the following specific description, in which:

    [0021] FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a filter according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention applied to a substrate;

    [0022] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a process of forming a filter region for use in a method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

    [0023] FIG. 3 is a schematic perspective view of the filter of FIG. 1 configured to detect radiation;

    [0024] FIG. 4 is a graph in which the transmission characteristic of the filter of FIG. 1 is plotted, and

    [0025] FIG. 5 illustrates schematically the filter of FIG. 1 implemented on the windscreen of a vehicle.

    [0026] With reference to FIG. 1, there is shown a layer of filter material 10 applied to a first face of a substrate 20 to provide a window 100 adapted for mitigating laser threats such as dazzle. The substrate 20 is substantially transmissive of visible light (for example, it may have a visible light transmission (VLT %) of around 90% of normally incident light) and may be formed, for example, from a glass or plastics material such as polycarbonate.

    [0027] The filter material 10 is an interference filter formed by a method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention for holographically exposing a photosensitive film with a plurality of lasers having a set of predetermined wavelengths, advantageously (but not necessarily essentially) within a selected wavelength band of bandwidth 10 nm or less.

    [0028] Conformable photosensitive (e.g. polymeric) films for use in exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be known to a person skilled in the art, and the present invention is not necessarily intended to be limited in this regard. Such photosensitive polymeric films are provided having varying degrees of inherent visible light transmission (VLT), ranging from less than 70% (and possibly, therefore, having a coloured tinge) up to 95% or more (and being substantially colourless and transparent). In respect of the present invention, suffice it to say that a photosensitive flexible/conformable (e.g. polymeric) film is selected having an inherent VLT of, for example, at least 85%. The film typically has a thickness of 1 to 100 micrometers. Thinner, currently known, films may not achieve useful optical densities. Indeed, in respect of currently known photosensitive polymeric films, the degree to which a selected radiation wavelength can be blocked (i.e. the effectiveness of a filter region formed therein) is determined by the thickness and refractive modulation index of the film and, also, by the optical design. Thus, the filter region thickness is ideally matched to the application and the potential power of the source from which protection is required (which may be dictated, at least to some extent, by the minimum distance from the target platform the laser threat may realistically be located and this, in turn, is dictated by application). In general, thicker films and films with higher refractive modulation indices would be selected if it were required to provide protection from higher power radiation sources or to provide greater angular coverage, but this might then have a detrimental effect on the inherent VLT of the film, so a balance is selected to meet the needs of a specific application.

    [0029] Whilst the present detailed description makes specific reference to a vehicle window, it is to be understood that the principles and techniques disclosed hereinafter are equally applicable to other applications such as eyeglasses, contact lenses, sensor protection films, screens or pull-down visors, laser designators, etc. and the present invention is not necessarily intended to be limited in this regard. It will be understood by a person skilled in the art that the following principles and techniques can be readily adapted to different laser protective/blocking applications, simply by selection of the film and the specific wavelengths to which the film is exposed to form the filter region(s).

    [0030] Thus, once the film has been selected, the required holographic exposure thereof is effected to form the filter regions of a required notch filter region to be provided thereon. Referring to FIG. 2 of the drawings, distinct filter regions defining a notch filter region of a predetermined bandwidth (e.g. 5 nm) may be formed by exposing the film to the intersection of two counter propagating laser beams for each of a set of laser wavelengths within the selected wavelength band having a selected spectral bandwidth. Each laser 100 (of a wavelength within the selected spectral bandwidth) produces a laser beam 120 which is controlled by a shutter 140. The laser beam 120 is directed by a mirror 160 into a beam splitter 180 wherein the beam is divided into equal beam segments 200. Each beam segment 200 passes through a microscope objective 220 and is then reflected by a respective mirror 360 onto the photosensitive polymer film 320. Other optical devices (not shown) may be provided between the microscope objective 220 and the mirror 360 to, for example, focus or diverge the respective beam segments 200, as required. Furthermore, masking or other limiting techniques may be utilised to limit the extent or thickness to which the film is exposed to the beam segments 200, as will be understood by a person skilled in the art. As a specific (non limiting) example, if it is required to provide a notch filter region of bandwidth 5 nm around 520 nm, then a plurality of lasers 100 may be used to produce the notch filter region of (purely by way of example) 517.5 nm, 518 nm, 518.5 nm, 519 nm, 519.5 nm, 520 nm, 520.5 nm, 521 nm, 521.5 nm, 522 nm and 522.5 nm. The above-described exposure process may be performed consecutively for each of these laser wavelengths or, in other exemplary embodiments, the exposures may be performed substantially simultaneously. Other apparatus for forming a holographic filter region at each specified wavelength is known and could, alternatively, be used.

    [0031] Once the exposure process has been completed, the resultant hologram can be fixed by, for example, a bleaching process.

    [0032] The transmission characteristic (which may alternatively be referred to as the transfer function) of visible electromagnetic radiation incident on the filter 10 is illustrated in FIG. 3. The transmission intensity relative to incident radiation intensity is shown on the y-axis and the wavelength of the incident radiation is shown on the x-axis.

    [0033] As can be seen on the plot, across the range of wavelengths the intensity of the transmitted radiation is close to 100% of that which is incident. In general a VLT % of 90% would be acceptable if 100% was not feasible.

    [0034] There are three distinct notches in the transmission characteristic associated with three wavelength bands. These are in particular a 10 nm band centred on 455 nm, a 10 nm band centred on 532 nm and a 10 nm band centred on 650 nm. In general any three notches from the group consisting of 405 nm, 455 nm, 520 nm, 532 nm, and 650 nm may be selected. Further, notches may be chosen to coincide with any expected laser threat wavelength. Still further, the bandwidth may be 5 nm.

    [0035] At the centre of each of these bands, the intensity of the transmitted radiation is at a minimum and has an optical density of approximately 3, which is equivalent to 0.1 A of the initially incident radiation.

    [0036] With reference to FIG. 4 there is shown generally at 201 a window. The window 200 comprises a transparent substrate 20 a first face of which has been coupled a radiation detector in the form of a detector layer 30.

    [0037] Coupled to the opposite face of the detector layer 30 there is provided a layer of the holographic filter material 10.

    [0038] As such the substrate 20, detector layer 30 and filter material 10 can be considered as a stacked multi-layer structure.

    [0039] The detector layer 30 may comprise an array of photodetectors 32 distributed so as to extend substantially across the window 200. The photodetectors 32 are sufficiently small to be substantially invisible to the casual observer (though in practice there may be some reduction on the VLT %). Each photodetector is electrically connected to a processor module 34. In some embodiments, including the present one, each photodetector is uniquely connected to a unique port on the processor module 34.

    [0040] The processor module 34 is, in turn, connected to an alert module 36.

    [0041] FIG. 5 shows a window 201 as shown in FIG. 4 deployed as a windscreen on a vehicle V, which in this example is an aircraft. A pilot P is positioned behind the windscreen and a laser beam L, having a wavelength of 532 nm, is shown pointing at the windscreen. Laser beam L will have some degree of divergence as the beam propagates through the atmosphere, which will result in a certain spot size observed at the windscreen.

    [0042] In operation the window 201 may be used to mitigate the effects of the laser beam L, and alert the pilot to the existence of the laser threat.

    [0043] In particular, as the laser beam L propagates onto the window 201 it will pass through the substrate 20 and into the detector layer 30 where some laser light will fall on one or more of the photodetectors 32 (depending on spot size).

    [0044] The laser light subsequently propagates from the detector layer 30 and on the filter 10 where the light becomes substantially attenuated. Assuming the filter 10 to have the transmission characteristics shown in FIG. 3 and the laser beam L to be a green laser of 532 nm, the laser beam L will be attenuated to 0.1% of its original intensity.

    [0045] Accordingly, the pilot P is able to look out of the windscreen with a reduced chance of the laser beam L harming his or her sight, or distracting him or her from flying the plane safely.

    [0046] Meanwhile, the laser light having fallen on certain photodetectors 32, an electrical signal is generated at each illuminated detector 32 and sent to the processing unit 34. At the processing unit 34 the electrical signals received from the illuminated photodetectors 32 are analysed to confirm or deny the detection of a laser beam. In this case, the processing module 36 generates a signal confirming the presence of the laser beam and relays this to the alert module 36.

    [0047] Each photodetector 32 can have a unique location at the filter, registered with the processor module such that signals from each photodetector 32 can be correlated with a certain location at the filter. Further this location can be correlated with a particular point on the window provided the relationship between the window and the filter is registered at the processing module. Thus the processing module can determine, from detecting which photodetectors are illuminated, not only the presence of a threat but also the general dimensions of the spot and where on the window the illumination is occurring. Some information relating to the source of the threat can be derived from such measurements. If embodiments are provided with layers of photodetectors, it may be possible to establish more confident estimates of the threat location.

    [0048] In the present embodiment the photodetectors 32 are configured for detecting radiation at the predetermined wavelength or predetermined wavelengths. For example the photodetector 32 could be configured to send a signal only if 527-537 nm radiation illuminated it. As such the system needs less noise-rejection provisions and/or can provide fewer false positive signals.

    [0049] Upon receiving the signal confirming the presence of the laser beam, the alert module issues an alert to notify the pilot P (or another operator) of the laser beam. Such alert could be a visual alert (for instance on an instrument in the cockpit) and/or an audible alert. Such alert could be a signal sent (e.g. by an RF transmitter within the alert module) to a further aircraft or a further element of aerospace infrastructure such as an Air Traffic Control base.

    [0050] Accordingly, should the pilot be otherwise unaware of the laser beam (for instance because it is sufficiently attenuated by the filter 10 to be negligible within the vehicle) the alert will inform as to the existence of the threat and further action (reporting to ground based security personnel, warning other aircraft) can be taken to address or remove the threat.

    [0051] As an alternative to window 200, the window 100 may be provided as the windscreen in vehicle V. Here there is no detection layer 30 and so there can be no automatic alert or detection of the laser threat.

    [0052] Nonetheless the holographic filter 10 will function to attenuate the intensity of the laser beam L and thereby protect the pilot.

    [0053] The above discussion has provided an overview of how the present invention may mitigate the threat of laser beams in various applications.

    [0054] Presently various lasers are commercially available which could be used against a number of targets at a number of different stand-off ranges. The likely distance and the power of the laser determine how effective the filter needs to be in order to prevent injury to the onlooker. An intensity-at-eyeball of 0.001 W/cm.sup.2 or less should be sufficient to prevent eye damage.

    [0055] Table 1 shows, for a 3 W laser with 0.5 mrad beam divergence and no atmospheric loss at various stand-off distances, the calculated minimum optical densities (OD) such that damage to the eye can be avoided by blinking (i.e. damage is negligible at this OD unless exposure is greater than 0.5 s, which is a determined minimum multiplied by a factor of safety of 2), and such that there is enough protection to render negligible the risk of damage from a 10 second exposure. Accordingly suggested ranges for ODs are proposed.

    TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Beam min OD min OD Example OD Distance diameter Spot Size Intensity Typical for 0.5 s for 10 s ranges (to (m) (mm) (mm.sup.2) (W/Cm.sup.2) Application exposure exposure nearest 0.5) 0 3 7.1 42.4 n/a 4.03 4.63 4.5-6.0 5 6 23.8 12.6 Car/train/bus 3.50 4.10 3.5-5.5 10 8 50.3 6.0 Car/train/bus 3.18 3.78 3.5-5.5 50 28 615.8 0.5 Car/train/bus/ 2.10 2.70 2.5-4.0 aircraft 100 53 2206.2 0.1 Car/train/bus/ 1.40 2.00 1.5-3.5 aircraft 500 253 50272.6 0.006 Aircraft 0.18 0.78 0.5-2.5 1000 503 198712.8 0.002 Aircraft n/a 0.30 0-1.5
    Table 2 shows, for a 1 W laser with 1.2 mrad beam divergence and no atmospheric loss at various stand-off distances, the calculated minimum optical densities (OD) such that damage to the eye can be avoided by blinking (i.e. damage is negligible at this OD unless exposure is greater than 0.5 s, which is a determined minimum multiplied by a factor of safety of 2), and such that there is enough protection to render negligible the risk of damage from a 10 second exposure. Accordingly suggested ranges for ODs are proposed.

    TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Beam min OD min OD Example OD Distance diameter Spot size Intensity Typical for 0.5 s for 10 s ranges (to (m) (mm) (mm2) (W/Cm2) application exposure exposure nearest 0.5) 0 3 7.1 14.1 n/a 3.55 4.15 4.0-5.5 5 9 63.6 1.57 Car/train/bus 2.59 3.20 3.0-4.5 10 15 176.7 0.57 Car/train/bus 2.15 2.76 2.5-4.5 50 63 3117.3 0.03 Car/train/bus/ 0.88 1.48 1.0-3.0 aircraft 100 123 11882.3 0.008 Car/train/bus/ 0.30 0.90 0.5-2.5 aircraft 500 603 285577.8 0.0004 Aircraft n/a n/a 0.5-1.5 1000 1203 1136635.3 0.00009 Aircraft n/a n/a n/a

    [0056] These experiments show that an optical density of 2 would tend to provide sufficient attenuation for aerospace applications, where attackers would struggle to get within 100 m of the aircraft.

    [0057] So that the dazzle can be prevented (dazzle being where the vision of the operator is temporarily impaired by the laser light but not permanently damaged) the OD values given in Table 1 or Table 2 should be increase in each scenario by 1, or more preferably 1.5 (i.e. and OD of 1 should become and OD of 2 or 2.5 to prevent dazzle).

    [0058] In a variant of the radiation detector shown in FIG. 2, the radiation detector may have the form of a patch arranged in the plane of the filter, or in other words at or near a boundary of the filter. Said patch could comprise an localised photodetector or array thereof and would be interfaced with the processor module and alert module in an equivalent manner. This approach would be suited to contexts where the spot size of the laser was sufficiently large to illuminate the periphery of the window, so that the patch need not be positioned in the operator's view.

    [0059] In a variant of the window and substrate arrangement of FIG. 1, the window may be comprised by a number of laminar substrates between which could be positioned the filter 10.

    [0060] In a variant of the window and substrate arrangement of FIG. 2, the window may be comprised by a number of laminar substrates between which could be positioned the filter and detector.

    [0061] It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art, from the foregoing description, that modifications and variations can be made to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.