MULTILAYER TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE FILM, MULTILAYER WIRING FILM, AND METHOD OF FORMING MULTILAYER WIRING FILM
20190105872 ยท 2019-04-11
Inventors
- Hiromi Nakazawa (Naka-shi, JP)
- Hiroshi Ishii (Naka-shi, JP)
- Yuto Toshimori (Naka-shi, JP)
- Atsushi Saito (Sanda-shi, JP)
- Yujiro Hayashi (Sanda-shi, JP)
Cpc classification
C01G23/002
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/3286
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B32B15/01
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B15/018
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C03C17/3647
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2237/706
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B37/021
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C03C17/3655
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
H01B13/00
ELECTRICITY
C23C28/3455
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01G15/006
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2237/408
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B32B7/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C04B2235/3232
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/9653
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B35/453
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
H01B5/14
ELECTRICITY
International classification
B32B7/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
H01B5/14
ELECTRICITY
B32B15/01
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
H01B13/00
ELECTRICITY
C04B35/453
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A multilayer transparent conductive film is provided, including: a Ag film that is formed of Ag or a Ag alloy; and a transparent conductive oxide film that is disposed on two opposite surfaces of the Ag film, in which the transparent conductive oxide film is formed of an oxide including Zn, Ga, and Ti.
Claims
1. A multilayer transparent conductive film, comprising: a Ag film that is formed of Ag or a Ag alloy; and a transparent conductive oxide film that is disposed on two opposite surfaces of the Ag film, wherein the transparent conductive oxide film is formed of an oxide including Zn, Ga, and Ti.
2. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 1, wherein atomic proportions with respect to all the metal elements included in the transparent conductive oxide film are Ga: 0.5 at % to 30.0 at %, Ti: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, and a balance of Zn.
3. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 2, wherein atomic proportions with respect to all the metal elements included in the transparent conductive oxide film are Ga: 0.5 at % to 18.0 at %, Ti: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, and a balance of Zn.
4. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 3, wherein atomic proportions with respect to all the metal elements included in the transparent conductive oxide film are Ga: 0.5 at % to 14.0 at %, Ti: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, and a balance of Zn.
5. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 1, wherein the oxide which forms the transparent conductive oxide film further includes Y.
6. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 5, wherein atomic proportions with respect to all the metal elements included in the transparent conductive oxide film are Ga: 0.5 at % to 30.0 at %, Ti: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, Y: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, and a balance of Zn.
7. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 1, wherein the Ag film is formed of a Ag alloy including 0.2 at % to 10.0 at % of one element or two or more elements in total selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er and a balance of Ag and inevitable impurities.
8. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 1, wherein a thickness of the Ag film is 10 nm or less.
9. The multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 1, wherein an average transmittance in a visible wavelength range of 400 to 800 nm is 85% or higher, and a sheet resistance value is 20 /sq. or lower.
10. A multilayer wiring film that is formed of the multilayer transparent conductive film according to claim 1, the multilayer wiring film comprising a wiring pattern.
11. A method of forming the multilayer wiring film according to claim 10, the method comprising: a multilayer transparent conductive film forming step of forming the multilayer transparent conductive film including the Ag film and the transparent conductive oxide film on a film forming surface of a base material; a resist film forming step of forming a resist film having a wiring pattern shape on the multilayer transparent conductive film; an etching step of collectively etching the multilayer transparent conductive film on which the resist film is formed by using an acidic mixed solution including phosphoric acid and acetic acid as an etchant; and a resist film removing step of removing the resist film after etching.
12. A method of forming the multilayer wiring film according to claim 10, the method comprising: a resist film forming step of forming a resist film having a reverse pattern shape of the wiring pattern on a film forming surface of a base material; a multilayer transparent conductive film forming step of forming the multilayer transparent conductive film including the Ag film and the transparent conductive oxide film on the film forming surface of the base material on which the resist film is formed; and a resist film removing step of removing the resist film.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0051] Hereinafter, a multilayer transparent conductive film according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0052] A multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment is used as a transparent electrode film for various displays and touch panels and particularly is used for a capacitive touch panel having a tablet size or more.
[0053] The multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment is shown in
[0054] In the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment, an average transmittance in a visible wavelength range of 400 to 800 nm is 85% or higher, and a sheet resistance value is 20 /sq. or lower.
[0055] The average transmittance of the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 in a visible wavelength range of 400 to 800 nm is preferably 85% or higher and more preferably 86% or higher. The higher the average transmittance, the better. Therefore, the upper limit value is not particularly limited but is preferably 95% and more preferably 90%. In addition, the sheet resistance value of the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 is preferably 20 /sq. or lower and more preferably 5 /sq. or lower. The lower the sheet resistance value of the multilayer transparent conductive film 10, the better. Therefore, the lower limit value is not particularly limited but is preferably 0.5 /sq. and more preferably 1 /sq.
[0056] The Ag film 12 is formed of Ag or a Ag alloy. Ag or the Ag alloy forming the Ag film 12 may be pure Ag having a purity of 99.9 mass % or higher or a Ag alloy including additive elements such as Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er.
[0057] From the viewpoint of preventing an increase in the absorptance of the Ag film 12 (a decrease in transmittance) and an increase in electrical resistance, the content of the additive elements is preferably 10.0 at % or lower and more preferably 2.0 at % or lower.
[0058] In the embodiment, the Ag film 12 is formed of a Ag alloy including 0.2 at % to 10.0 at % of one element or two or more elements in total selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er and a balance of Ag and inevitable impurities.
[0059] In the embodiment, Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er included in the Ag alloy forming the Ag film 12 are elements that have an effect of improving wettability of the Ag film 12 on the first transparent conductive oxide film 11, and can prevent aggregation of Ag even in a case where the Ag film 12 is formed to be thin.
[0060] Here, in a case where the total content of one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er is lower than 0.2 at %, the above-described effect may not be sufficiently exhibited. On the other hand, in a case where the total content of one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er is higher than 10.0 at %, the transmittance of the Ag film 12 may decrease and the resistance value may increase.
[0061] Due to the above-described reasons, in the embodiment, the total content of one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er in the Ag alloy forming the Ag film 12 is in a range of 0.2 at % to 10.0 at %.
[0062] In order to reliably exhibit the above-described effect, the lower limit of the total content of one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er in the Ag alloy forming the Ag film 12 is preferably 0.3 at % or higher and more preferably 0.5 at % or higher. On the other hand, in order to prevent a decrease in transmittance and an increase in resistivity, the upper limit of the total content of one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er is preferably 8.0 at % or lower, more preferably 5.0 at % or lower, and still more preferably 2.0 at % or lower.
[0063] In the embodiment, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are formed of an oxide including Zn, Ga, and Ti or an oxide including Zn, Ga, Ti, and Y.
[0064] That is, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are formed of a Zn oxide to which Ga and Ti are added or Ga, Ti, and Y are added.
[0065] In the embodiment, atomic proportions of Ga, Ti, and Y with respect to all the metal elements included in each of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are Ga: 0.5 at % to 30.0 at %, Ti: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, and Y: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %.
[0066] The first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 do not necessarily have the same composition and only have to be in the above-described composition range.
[0067] Here, the Ga content (the atomic proportion of Ga with respect to all the metal elements) with respect to all the metal elements included in each of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 is 0.5 at % or higher. As a result, aggregation of Ag in the Ag film 12 can be prevented, and an increase in the electrical resistance of the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 can be prevented. On the other hand, by adjusting the Ga content to be 30.0 at % or lower, an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be prevented. Further, by adjusting the Ga content to be 18.0 at % or lower, an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be further prevented.
[0068] In order to prevent aggregation of Ag in the Ag film 12, the lower limit of the Ga content is preferably 1.0 at % or higher and more preferably 2.0 at % or higher. In addition, in order to reliably prevent an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, the upper limit of the Ga content is preferably 25.0 at % or lower, more preferably 20.0 at % or lower, still more preferably 18.0 at % or lower, and even still more preferably 14.0 at % or lower.
[0069] In addition, by adjusting the Ti content with respect to all the metal elements included in each of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 to be 0.1 at % or higher, alkali resistance and environment resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be improved. On the other hand, by adjusting the Ti content to be 10.0 at % or lower, an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be prevented.
[0070] In order to reliably improve the alkali resistance and environment resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, the lower limit of the Ti content is preferably 0.2 at % or higher and more preferably 0.5 at % or higher. In order to reliably prevent an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, the upper limit of the Ti content is preferably 9.0 at % or lower and more preferably 8.0 at % or lower.
[0071] Further, by adjusting the Y content with respect to all the metal elements included in each of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 to be 0.1 at % or higher, alkali resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be improved. On the other hand, by adjusting the Y content to be 10.0 at % or lower, an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be prevented.
[0072] In order to reliably improve the alkali resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, the lower limit of the Y content is preferably 0.2 at % or higher and more preferably 0.5 at % or higher. In order to reliably prevent an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, the upper limit of the Y content is preferably 9.0 at % or lower and more preferably 8.0 at % or lower.
[0073] In addition, in order to reliably prevent an increase in the electrical resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, the total content of Ga, Ti, and Y is preferably 35.0 at % or lower, more preferably 30.0 at % or lower, and still more preferably 25.0 at % or lower.
[0074] Here, in the embodiment, in order to improve the transmittance, a thickness t2 of the Ag film 12 is set to be 10 nm or less. In order to further improve the transmittance, the thickness t2 of the Ag film 12 is preferably 9 nm or less and more preferably 8 nm or less. In addition, the lower limit of the thickness t2 of the Ag film 12 is preferably 3 nm or more and more preferably 4 nm or more.
[0075] A thickness t1 of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and a thickness t3 of the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are set such that the transmittance in a visible range is improved due to an optical interference effect by performing an optical simulation on a three-layer structure of the first transparent conductive oxide film/Ag film (Ag alloy film)/second transparent conductive oxide film using optical constants (a refractive index and an extinction coefficient) of each of the single layer films.
[0076] It is preferable that the thickness t1 (nm) of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the thickness t3 (nm) of the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 be substantially in the following range.
t1=550/(4n1)k1
t3=550/(4n3)k3
[0077] Here, n1 and n3 represent a refractive index (n1) of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and a refractive index (n3) of the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, respectively. In addition, k1 and k3 represent a coefficient (k1) of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and a coefficient (k3) of the second transparent conductive oxide film 13, respectively. That is, in the optical simulation, the thicknesses are obtained after optimizing the coefficients k1 and k3 to improve the transmittance in a visible range.
[0078] Optimum values of the coefficients k1 and k3 vary depending on the transparent conductive oxide, respectively. However, the coefficients k1 and k3 are preferably in a range of 0.2 to 0.8 and more preferably in a range of 0.4 to 0.7. In particular, in a case where the coefficients k1 and k3 are about 0.6, the transmittance in a visible range is improved irrespective of the kind of the transparent conductive oxide.
[0079] In the embodiment, as a result of the optical simulation, the thickness t1 of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the thickness t3 of the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are set as 40 nm. These thicknesses are set assuming that the coefficients k1 and k3 are 0.6.
[0080] Next, a multilayer wiring film 30 according to the embodiment of the present invention and a method of forming the multilayer wiring film 30 will be described with reference to
[0081] In the multilayer wiring film 30 according to the embodiment, as shown in
[0082] Here, the multilayer wiring film 30 is formed as follows.
[0083] First, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment is formed on a film forming surface of the substrate 20 as a base material (multilayer transparent conductive film forming step S11).
[0084] In the multilayer transparent conductive film forming step S11, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 is formed as an underlayer on the substrate 20. It is preferable that the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 be formed by DC sputtering using a sintered target with which the film composition can be easily controlled. Next, the Ag film 12 is formed on the formed first transparent conductive oxide film 11 by DC sputtering using a Ag target. The Ag target has a composition corresponding to the composition of the formed Ag film 12. The second transparent conductive oxide film 13 is formed on the formed Ag film 12 by DC sputtering using a transparent conductive oxide target. It is preferable that the transparent conductive oxide target be a sintered target with which the film composition can be easily controlled. This way, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment is formed.
[0085] Next, a resist film 41 is formed on the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 formed on the surface of the substrate 20, and the resist film 41 is exposed and developed. As a result, a wiring pattern is formed (resist film forming step S12).
[0086] Next, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 on which the resist film 41 is formed is collectively etched by using an acidic mixed solution including phosphoric acid and acetic acid as an etchant (etching step S13). Here, in the acidic mixed solution including phosphoric acid and acetic acid, it is preferable that the content of the phosphoric acid be 55 vol % or higher and the content of the acetic acid be 30 vol % or higher. The mixed solution may include 20 vol % or lower of nitric acid in addition to phosphoric acid and acetic acid.
[0087] Next, the resist film 41 is removed using an alkaline resist remover (resist film removing step S14).
[0088] As a result, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 positioned below the resist film 41 having a wiring pattern shape remains, and the multilayer wiring film 30 including the wiring pattern is formed.
[0089] In the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment having the above-described configuration, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 is formed as an underlayer on the surface of the substrate 20, and the Ag film 12 is formed on the first transparent conductive oxide film 11. Therefore, wettability of the Ag film 12 is improved, and aggregation of Ag is prevented even in a case where the Ag film 12 is formed to be thin.
[0090] Further, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 have high environment resistance. Therefore, even in a case where the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 is used in a high-humidity environment, penetration of moisture into the Ag film 12 can be prevented, and aggregation of Ag can be prevented.
[0091] Accordingly, the occurrence of surface plasmon absorption caused by aggregation of Ag in the Ag film 12 can be prevented, and high transmittance can be obtained. In addition, the Ag film 12 is formed as a continuous film, and thus electrical resistance can also be reduced.
[0092] In the embodiment, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are formed of a Zn oxide to which Ga and Ti are added or Ga, Ti, and Y are added, and atomic proportions of Ga, Ti, and Y with respect to all the metal elements included in each of the transparent conductive oxide films are Ga: 0.5 at % to 30.0 at %, Ti: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %, and Y: 0.1 at % to 10.0 at %. Therefore, aggregation of Ag can be prevented due to addition of Ga, and an increase in electrical resistance can be prevented. In addition, alkali resistance and environment resistance can be improved due to the addition of Ti. Further, alkali resistance can be improved due to the addition of Y.
[0093] Further, in the embodiment, the thickness t2 of the Ag film 12 is set to be 10 nm or less. Therefore, the transmittance can be improved. In addition, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 is formed as an underlayer on the surface of the substrate 20. Therefore, even in a case where the thickness of the Ag film 12 is 10 nm or less, aggregation of Ag does not occur, the Ag film 12 is formed as a continuous film, and electrical resistance can be reduced.
[0094] In addition, in the embodiment, the Ag film 12 is formed of a Ag alloy including 0.2 at % to 10.0 at % of one element or two or more elements in total selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er and a balance of Ag and inevitable impurities. Therefore, aggregation of the Ag film 12 can be further prevented, and even in a case where the Ag film 12 is formed to be thinner, the Ag film 12 is formed as a continuous film, and high transmittance and low resistance value can be realized at the same time.
[0095] Further, in the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment, the average transmittance in a visible wavelength range of 400 to 800 nm is 85% or higher, and the sheet resistance value is 20 /sq. or lower. Therefore, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 has sufficiently high transmittance and sufficiently low electrical resistance, and thus can be used as a fine transparent electrode film or a fine transparent wiring film.
[0096] In addition, in the multilayer wiring film 30 according to the embodiment, the wiring pattern is formed on the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 according to the embodiment. Therefore, low electrical resistance and high transmittance can be obtained.
[0097] Further, in the embodiment, in a case where the acidic mixed solution including phosphoric acid and acetic acid is used as an etchant in the etching step S13, a difference in etching rate between the Ag film 12, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11, and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 is small. Therefore, even in a case where the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 is collectively etched, the over-etching of the Ag film 12 or the remaining of residues of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 can be prevented, and the wiring pattern can be accurately formed.
[0098] In addition, in the embodiment, the alkali resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 is improved due to the addition of Ti or the addition of Ti and Y. Therefore, even in a case where the resist film is removed using the alkaline resist remover in the resist film removing step S14, deterioration of the characteristics of the multilayer wiring film 30 can be prevented.
[0099] Hereinabove, the embodiment of the present invention has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiment, and various modifications can be made within a range not departing from the technical ideas of the present invention.
[0100] For example, in the above description of the embodiment, the Ag film 12 is formed of a Ag alloy including 0.2 at % to 10.0 at % of one element or two or more elements in total selected from the group consisting of Cu, Sn, Sb, Ti, Mg, Zn, Ge, In, Al, Ga, Pd, Au, Pt, Bi, Mn, Sc, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Er and a balance of Ag and inevitable impurities. However, the Ag film 12 is not limited to this configuration, and may be formed of pure Ag or a Ag alloy including another metal element that is solid-soluble in Ag.
[0101] In addition, in the above description of the embodiment, the thicknesses of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are about 40 nm However, the thicknesses are not limited to this configuration and may be other values. However, as described above in the embodiment, it is preferable that the thicknesses be selected such that the transmittance is improved due to an optical interference effect by performing the optical simulation.
[0102] Further, in the above description of the embodiment, the multilayer wiring film 30 is formed using an etching method. However, the embodiment is not limited to this configuration, and the multilayer wiring film 30 may be formed using a lift-off method as shown in
[0103] In the method of forming the multilayer wiring film 30 shown in
[0104] Next, the first transparent conductive oxide film 11, the Ag film 12, and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 are sequentially formed using a sputtering method on the substrate 20 on which the resist film 41 including the reverse pattern is formed. As a result, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 is formed on the resist film 41 and the substrate 20 (the multilayer transparent conductive film forming step S22).
[0105] Next, the resist film 41 is removed using an alkaline resist remover (resist film removing step S23).
[0106] As a result, the multilayer transparent conductive film 10 formed on the resist film 41 having the reverse pattern shape is removed, and the multilayer wiring film 30 including the wiring pattern is formed.
[0107] According to the method of forming the multilayer wiring film 30 having the above-described configuration, the wiring pattern can be accurately formed without performing the etching step. In addition, the alkali resistance of the first transparent conductive oxide film 11 and the second transparent conductive oxide film 13 is improved due to the addition of Ti or the addition of Ti and Y. Therefore, even in a case where the resist film is removed using alkaline resist remover in the resist film removing step S23, deterioration of the characteristics of the multilayer wiring film 30 can be prevented.
Examples
[0108] The results of an experiment for verifying the effect of the multilayer transparent conductive film according to the present invention will be described.
[0109] Each of multilayer transparent conductive films having structures shown in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 was formed on a surface of a glass substrate (non-alkali glass: 50 mm50 mm1 mint) using a sputtering method. In Comparative Examples A and B, an ITO single layer film was formed using a sputtering method. In addition, only in Comparative Example B, the glass substrate was heated to 200 C. to form a film.
[0110] Here, by performing the optical simulation described in the embodiment, the thickness of the transparent conductive oxide film was selected such that the transmittance in a visible range was improved due to an optical interference effect. The thicknesses of all the Examples were 40 nm.
[0111] The thicknesses of the Ag film and the transparent conductive oxide films in each of Examples according to the present invention and Comparative Examples were measured using a film thickness meter (DEKTAK, manufactured by ULVAC Inc.).
[0112] In addition, the compositions of the transparent conductive oxide films and the Ag alloy film were obtained by performing elemental quantitative analysis using an ICP atomic emission spectrometer (STS-3500DD, manufactured by Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation).
[0113] In order to prepare the transparent conductive oxide films, oxide sintered body targets having compositions shown in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 were used.
[0114] In order to prepare the Ag films, Ag targets having compositions shown in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 were used. Film forming conditions of each of the films are as follows.
[0115] In each of Comparative Examples, the composition of the ITO film (an oxide obtained by adding Sn to In.sub.2O.sub.3) was In: 35.6 at %, Sn: 3.6 at %, and O: 60.8 at %.
[0116] The composition of the GZO film (an oxide obtained by adding Ga to ZnO) were Zn: 47.3 at %, Ga: 2.2 at %, and O: 50.5 at %.
<Film Forming Conditions of Transparent Conductive Oxide Film>
[0117] Sputtering device: a DC magnetron sputtering device (CS-200, manufactured by ULVAC Inc.)
[0118] Magnetic field intensity: 1000 Gauss (immediately above the target, vertical component)
[0119] Peak vacuum degree: 510.sup.5 Pa or lower
[0120] Sputtering gas: mixed gas of Ar+O.sub.2 (mixing ratio of O.sub.2: 1%)
[0121] Sputtering gas pressure: 0.4 Pa
[0122] Sputtering power: DC 100 W
<Film Forming Conditions of Ag Film>
[0123] Sputtering device: a DC magnetron sputtering device (CS-200, manufactured by ULVAC Inc.)
[0124] Magnetic field intensity: 1000 Gauss (immediately above the target, vertical component)
[0125] Peak vacuum degree: 510.sup.5 Pa or lower
[0126] Sputtering gas: Ar
[0127] Sputtering gas pressure: 0.5 Pa
[0128] Sputtering power: DC 100 W
[0129] Regarding the obtained multilayer transparent conductive film and the ITO single layer film, a sheet resistance and a transmittance after film formation were evaluated.
[0130] In addition, a sheet resistance and a transmittance after a temperature-and-humidity-controlled test and a sheet resistance and a transmittance after an alkali resistance test were evaluated.
[0131] Further, regarding the obtained multilayer transparent conductive film, a patterning test using an etching method and a patterning test using a lift-off method were performed.
[0132] Evaluation methods are as follows.
<Sheet Resistance>
[0133] Using a surface resistance meter (Loresta AP MCP-T400, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation), a sheet resistance was measured according to a four-point probe method. The results of measuring the sheet resistance are shown in Tables 5, 6, 7, and 8.
<Transmittance>
[0134] Using a spectrophotometer (U4100, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation), a transmittance spectrum in a wavelength range of 400 nm to 800 nm was measured to obtain an average transmittance (transmittance). The results of measuring the transmittance are shown in Tables 9, 10, 11, and 12.
<Temperature-and-Humidity-Controlled Test>
[0135] After leaving the film to stand in a thermohygrostat bath at a temperature of 85 C. and a humidity of 85% for 250 hours, the transmittance and the sheet resistance after the test were measured, and change rates of the transmittance and the sheet resistance from those before the test were evaluated.
<Alkali Resistance Test>
[0136] After dipping the film in an alkaline resist remover (pH 9, TOK-104, manufactured by Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.) at a temperature of 40 C. for 10 minutes, the transmittance and the sheet resistance after dipping were measured, and change rates of the transmittance and the sheet resistance from those before dipping were evaluated.
<Patterning Test using Etching Method>
[0137] A resist film was formed on the multilayer transparent conductive film using a photolithography method in a wiring pattern shape (line width/space width: 30 m/30 m). The multilayer transparent conductive film was collectively etched using a mixed solution (SEA-5, manufactured by Kanto Kagaku) including phosphoric acid and acetic acid as an etchant. Etching was performed for an appropriate etching time (20 seconds to 120 seconds) without heating. In addition, in the mixed solution, the content of the phosphoric acid was 55 vol % or lower, and the content of the acetic acid was 30 vol %.
[0138] Next, the resist film was removed using an alkaline resist remover (pH9, TOK-104, manufactured by Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.) to form a wiring pattern, and the formed wiring pattern was observed using an optical microscope (laser microscope VK-X200, manufactured by Keyence Corporation) at a magnification of 50 times to determine whether or not residues of the transparent conductive oxide film were present. Specifically, in a case where the presence of the transparent conductive oxide film remaining in a needle shape or a particle shape without being etched was recognized, it was determined the residues of the transparent conductive oxide film were present. Otherwise, it was determined that the residues of the transparent conductive oxide film were not present. The results of measuring Example 3 and Comparative Example 2 are shown in
[0139] In addition, a cross-section (a cross-section perpendicular to the film forming surface of the substrate 20 perpendicular to the line and the space) of the pattern before removing the resist film was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SU8000, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) at a magnification of 50000 times. The result of observing the cross-sectional shape of Example 3 is shown in
[0140] In addition, the resist was removed, and the surface of the multilayer film was observed by visual inspection.
<Patterning Test Using Lift-Off Method>
[0141] In addition, a resist solution was applied to the substrate, a photomask on which a wiring pattern (line width/space width: 30 m/30 m) was formed was attached thereto, and the substrate was exposed to ultraviolet light using an exposure machine. Next, the exposed portion was removed using a developer, and a reverse pattern was formed using a photolithography method.
[0142] Next, the multilayer transparent conductive film was formed using the sputtering device as described above on the substrate on which the reverse pattern was formed.
[0143] Next, the substrate was dipped in a resist remover (ph9, TOK-104, manufactured by Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.) to remove the multilayer transparent conductive film formed on the resist film, and then the formed wiring pattern was observed using an optical microscope (laser microscope VK-X200, manufactured by Keyence Corporation) at a magnification of 50 times to measure the accuracy of the electrode pattern. In a case where film peeling or resist residues were observed in the line (P), it was determined that the electrode pattern was not accurately formed. Otherwise, it was determined that the electrode pattern was accurately formed.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 First Transparent Conductive Second Transparent Conductive Oxide Film Oxide Film at % with respect to All Metal Ag Film at % with respect to All Metal Components Thickness Components Zn Ga Ti Y Composition nm Zn Ga Ti Y Exam- 1 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-0.2at % Cu 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 ple 2 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 3 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 4 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-10.0at % Cu 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-0.2at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 6 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 7 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 8 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-10.0at % Sn 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 9 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-0.2at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 11 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 12 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-5.0at % Sb 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 13 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-0.2at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 14 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 15 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 16 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-3.0at % Ti 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 17 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-0.2at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 18 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 19 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 20 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-10.0at % Mg 5 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 21 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 22 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 23 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 24 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 25 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.0 26 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 27 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 28 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 29 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 30 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 0.0 31 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag 6 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 32 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 First Transparent Conductive Second Transparent Conductive Oxide Film Oxide Film at % with respect to All Metal Ag Film at % with respect to All Metal Components Thickness Components Zn Ga Ti Y Composition nm Zn Ga Ti Y Exam- 33 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 ple 34 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 35 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 36 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 37 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 38 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 39 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 40 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 41 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 42 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 30.0 0.1 0.1 43 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 44 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 45 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 46 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 47 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 0.5 10.0 10.0 48 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag 6 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 49 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 50 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Cu-0.5at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 51 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-5.0at % Cu-5.0at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 52 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Cu-0.5 at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 53 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Cu-0.5at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 54 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-5.0at % Cu-5.0at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 55 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Sn-0.5at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 56 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Sn-0.5at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 57 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Sb-0.5at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 58 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-0.5at % Sb-0.5at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 59 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 60 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 61 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 62 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 63 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 64 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 65 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 66 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 67 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 68 Balance 14.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 First Transparent Conductive Second Transparent Conductive Oxide Film Oxide Film at % with respect to All Metal Ag Film at % with respect to All Metal Components Thickness Components Zn Ga Ti Y Composition nm Zn Ga Ti Y Exam- 69 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 ple 70 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 71 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 72 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 73 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 0.0 74 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 75 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 76 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 77 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 78 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 18.0 2.5 4.0 79 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 80 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 81 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 82 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 83 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 Balance 20.0 2.5 4.0 84 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Zn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 85 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Ge 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 86 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % In 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 87 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Al 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 88 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Ga 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 89 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Pd 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 90 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Au 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 91 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Pt 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 92 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Bi 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 93 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Mn 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 94 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sc 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 95 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Y 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 96 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Nd 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 97 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Sm 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 98 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Eu 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 99 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Gd 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 100 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Tb 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 101 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0 Ag-1.0at % Er 10 Balance 14.0 2.5 4.0
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 First Transparent Second Transparent Conductive Oxide Film Ag Film Conductive Oxide Film Thickness Thickness Thickness Composition nm Composition nm Composition nm Compara- 1 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Cu 5 ITO 40 tive 2 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 ITO 40 Exam- 3 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sn 5 ITO 40 ple 4 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 ITO 40 5 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sb 5 ITO 40 6 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 ITO 40 7 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Ti 5 ITO 40 8 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 ITO 40 9 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Mg 5 ITO 40 10 ITO 40 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 ITO 40 11 ITO 40 Ag 5 ITO 40 12 ITO 40 Ag 10 ITO 40 13 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Cu 5 GZO 40 14 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Cu 10 GZO 40 15 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sn 5 GZO 40 16 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sn 10 GZO 40 17 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sb 5 GZO 40 18 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Sb 10 GZO 40 19 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Ti 5 GZO 40 20 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Ti 10 GZO 40 21 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Mg 5 GZO 40 22 GZO 40 Ag-1.0at % Mg 10 GZO 40 23 GZO 40 Ag 5 GZO 40 24 GZO 40 Ag 10 GZO 40 A ITO 600 B ITO 180
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Sheet Resistance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Length of Test Change Change Over-Etching (/sq.) (/sq.) Rate (%) (/Sq.) Rate (%) (m) Exam- 1 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 ple 2 8.9 8.6 3.4 9.1 2.2 0.4 3 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.4 4 12.1 11.7 3.3 12.5 3.3 0.7 5 4.4 4.2 4.5 4.5 2.3 0.6 6 9.1 8.9 2.2 9.4 3.3 0.5 7 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.4 8 10.8 10.4 3.7 11.2 3.7 0.8 9 4.0 3.9 2.5 4.1 2.5 0.5 10 8.8 8.6 2.3 9.1 3.4 0.6 11 3.8 3.7 2.6 3.9 2.6 0.4 12 11.8 11.5 2.5 12.1 2.5 0.6 13 4.6 4.5 2.2 4.7 2.2 0.5 14 9.3 9.0 3.2 9.6 3.2 0.8 15 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 16 13.0 12.6 3.1 13.4 3.1 0.7 17 4.2 4.1 2.4 4.3 2.4 0.4 18 9.0 8.7 3.3 9.2 2.2 0.7 19 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.5 20 12.2 11.8 3.3 12.6 3.3 0.6 21 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 22 4.2 4.1 2.4 4.3 2.4 0.6 23 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.3 24 4.4 4.3 2.3 4.5 2.3 0.6 25 4.0 3.9 2.5 4.1 2.5 0.4 26 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 27 4.4 4.3 2.3 4.5 2.3 0.5 28 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.6 29 4.6 4.5 2.2 4.7 2.2 0.5 30 4.2 4.1 2.4 4.3 2.4 0.6 31 17.6 19.6 11.4 19.8 12.5 0.8 32 5.2 5.7 9.6 5.8 11.5 0.7
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Sheet Resistance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Length of Test Change Change Over-Etching (/sq.) (/sq.) Rate (%) (/Sq.) Rate (%) (m) Exam- 33 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 ple 34 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 35 4.0 3.9 2.5 4.1 2.5 0.6 36 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.6 2.2 0.4 37 4.6 4.5 2.2 4.7 2.2 0.6 38 4.2 4.1 2.4 4.3 2.4 0.5 39 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.6 40 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 41 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.6 2.2 0.6 42 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 43 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.6 2.2 0.5 44 4.6 4.5 2.2 4.7 2.2 0.7 45 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 46 4.7 4.6 2.1 4.8 2.1 0.6 47 4.4 4.3 2.3 4.5 2.3 0.5 48 18.2 19.8 8.8 19.0 4.4 0.9 49 5.6 6.0 7.1 5.9 5.4 0.7 50 4.0 3.9 2.5 4.1 2.5 0.5 51 6.2 6.0 3.2 6.5 4.8 0.7 52 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.6 53 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 54 6.4 6.2 3.1 6.6 3.1 0.7 55 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.4 56 4.2 4.1 2.4 4.3 2.4 0.6 57 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.5 58 4.0 3.9 2.5 4.1 2.5 0.4 59 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.5 60 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.6 61 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.6 62 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 63 3.8 3.7 2.6 3.9 2.6 0.4 64 4.0 3.9 2.5 4.1 2.5 0.6 65 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 66 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.6 2.2 0.6 67 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.5 68 4.1 4.0 2.4 4.2 2.4 0.6
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Sheet Resistance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Length of Test Change Change Over-Etching (/sq.) (/sq.) Rate (%) (/Sq.) Rate (%) (m) Exam- 69 4.8 4.7 2.1 4.9 2.1 0.5 ple 70 4.9 4.8 2.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 71 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.6 2.2 0.6 72 5.0 4.9 2.0 5.1 2.0 0.4 73 5.1 5.0 2.0 5.2 2.0 0.5 74 4.9 4.8 2.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 75 5.0 4.9 2.0 5.1 2.0 0.5 76 4.7 4.6 2.1 4.8 2.1 0.6 77 5.0 4.9 2.0 5.1 2.0 0.4 78 5.2 5.1 1.9 5.3 1.9 0.6 79 5.8 5.6 3.4 6.0 3.4 0.6 80 5.9 5.7 3.4 6.1 3.4 0.6 81 5.7 5.5 3.5 5.9 3.5 0.7 82 6.2 6.0 3.2 6.4 3.2 0.5 83 6.1 5.9 3.3 6.3 3.3 0.7 84 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 85 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.7 4.4 0.6 86 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.6 87 4.6 4.5 2.2 4.8 4.3 0.7 88 4.5 4.4 2.2 4.7 4.4 0.6 89 4.1 4.1 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.4 90 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.4 91 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.1 2.5 0.4 92 3.9 3.8 2.6 4.0 2.6 0.6 93 4.6 4.7 2.2 4.8 4.3 0.7 94 4.6 4.8 4.3 4.8 4.3 0.8 95 4.5 4.6 2.2 4.7 4.4 0.7 96 4.7 4.6 2.1 4.9 4.3 0.6 97 4.4 4.3 2.3 4.5 2.3 0.6 98 4.3 4.2 2.3 4.4 2.3 0.5 99 4.7 4.8 2.1 4.9 4.3 0.7 100 4.8 5.0 4.2 5.0 4.2 0.9 101 4.8 4.9 2.1 5.0 4.2 0.8
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Sheet Resistance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Length of Test Change Change Over-Etching (/sq.) (/sq.) Rate (%) (/Sq.) Rate (%) (m) Compara- 1 15.3 17.4 13.7 15.4 0.7 4.2 tive 2 8.3 9.8 18.1 8.4 1.2 4.8 Exam- 3 14.9 16.8 12.8 15.0 0.7 4.6 ple 4 8.8 10.1 14.8 8.9 1.1 4.7 5 13.6 18.4 35.3 13.8 1.5 3.9 6 8.1 10.8 33.3 8.3 2.5 4.5 7 15.5 17.4 12.3 15.7 1.3 4.9 8 8.6 9.7 12.8 8.8 2.3 5.1 9 15.3 17.2 12.4 15.4 0.7 4.8 10 8.8 9.9 12.5 9.0 2.3 3.9 11 18.9 25.6 35.4 20.3 7.4 5.4 12 10.5 14.5 38.1 11.4 8.6 5.8 13 10.5 11.9 13.3 11.9 13.3 2.9 14 5.8 6.8 17.2 6.5 12.1 2.6 15 11.2 12.5 11.6 12.5 11.6 3.1 16 6.4 7.1 10.9 7.1 10.9 2.8 17 10.2 12.0 17.6 12.3 20.6 2.8 18 5.4 6.4 18.5 6.4 18.5 2.4 19 11.5 13.2 14.8 12.8 11.3 3.0 20 6.8 7.9 16.2 7.8 14.7 3.1 21 11.3 13.0 15.0 12.6 11.5 2.9 22 6.6 7.8 18.2 7.5 13.6 2.8 23 8.8 11.4 29.5 11.0 25.0 3.9 24 14.6 18.6 27.4 17.6 20.5 3.6 A 9.8 9.4 4.1 9.7 1.0 B 9.7 9.5 2.1 9.6 1.0
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Transmittance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Test Change Change (%) (%) Rate (%) (%) Rate (%) Exam- 1 85.6 86.0 0.5 85.7 0.1 ple 2 86.3 86.7 0.5 86.3 0.0 3 85.9 86.2 0.3 86.0 0.1 4 85.6 86.1 0.6 85.5 0.1 5 85.5 86.0 0.6 85.6 0.1 6 86.0 86.4 0.5 86.1 0.1 7 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.8 0.1 8 85.5 86.0 0.6 85.4 0.1 9 85.7 86.2 0.6 85.6 0.1 10 86.4 86.8 0.5 86.5 0.1 11 86.2 86.6 0.5 86.1 0.1 12 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.6 0.1 13 85.4 85.8 0.5 85.3 0.1 14 85.9 86.3 0.5 85.8 0.1 15 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.7 0.0 16 85.3 85.5 0.2 85.4 0.1 17 85.6 86.0 0.5 85.5 0.1 18 86.1 86.5 0.5 86.2 0.1 19 85.8 86.2 0.5 85.7 0.1 20 85.6 85.9 0.4 85.6 0.0 21 86.0 86.3 0.3 85.8 0.2 22 85.8 86.2 0.5 85.7 0.1 23 86.3 86.6 0.3 86.1 0.2 24 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.5 0.2 25 85.8 86.2 0.5 85.6 0.2 26 85.9 86.2 0.3 85.8 0.1 27 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.6 0.1 28 86.2 86.5 0.3 86.2 0.0 29 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.7 0.0 30 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.8 0.1 31 85.1 85.5 0.5 85.2 0.1 32 85.4 85.8 0.5 85.6 0.2
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Transmittance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Test Change Change (%) (%) Rate (%) (%) Rate (%) Exam- 33 86.0 86.3 0.3 86.1 0.1 ple 34 85.8 86.1 0.3 85.8 0.0 35 86.3 86.7 0.5 86.2 0.1 36 85.8 86.0 0.2 85.8 0.0 37 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.8 0.1 38 86.1 86.4 0.3 86.0 0.1 39 85.9 86.3 0.5 85.8 0.1 40 86.4 86.7 0.3 86.5 0.1 41 85.8 86.2 0.5 85.7 0.1 42 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.8 0.1 43 85.9 86.2 0.3 85.9 0.0 44 85.8 86.0 0.2 85.7 0.1 45 86.0 86.2 0.2 86.1 0.1 46 85.6 85.8 0.2 85.6 0.0 47 85.6 85.9 0.4 85.7 0.1 48 85.3 85.5 0.2 85.4 0.1 49 85.5 85.8 0.4 85.7 0.2 50 85.9 86.2 0.3 86.0 0.1 51 85.5 86.0 0.6 85.4 0.1 52 86.2 86.5 0.3 86.2 0.0 53 85.9 86.2 0.3 86.0 0.1 54 85.6 86.0 0.5 85.5 0.1 55 86.2 86.5 0.3 86.1 0.1 56 85.8 86.1 0.3 85.9 0.1 57 86.0 86.5 0.6 86.1 0.1 58 86.0 86.3 0.3 85.9 0.1 59 85.9 86.3 0.5 86.0 0.1 60 86.0 86.4 0.5 85.9 0.1 61 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.6 0.1 62 85.8 86.1 0.3 85.9 0.1 63 86.2 86.5 0.3 86.3 0.1 64 86.3 86.6 0.3 86.2 0.1 65 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.6 0.1 66 85.8 86.1 0.3 85.8 0.0 67 85.8 86.1 0.3 85.9 0.1 68 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.6 0.1
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Transmittance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Test Change Change (%) (%) Rate (%) (%) Rate (%) Exam- 69 85.6 86.0 0.5 85.5 0.1 ple 70 85.4 85.7 0.4 85.5 0.1 71 85.9 86.4 0.6 85.8 0.1 72 85.3 85.7 0.5 85.4 0.1 73 85.4 85.9 0.6 85.3 0.1 74 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.7 0.0 75 85.4 85.7 0.4 85.5 0.1 76 85.9 86.3 0.5 85.8 0.1 77 85.4 85.8 0.5 85.4 0.0 78 85.3 85.6 0.4 85.2 0.1 79 85.4 85.8 0.5 85.2 0.2 80 85.2 85.6 0.5 85.0 0.2 81 85.6 85.9 0.4 85.4 0.2 82 85.2 85.6 0.5 85.0 0.2 83 85.0 85.3 0.4 84.8 0.2 84 85.9 86.2 0.3 85.8 0.1 85 85.7 86.1 0.5 85.5 0.2 86 85.8 86.2 0.5 85.7 0.1 87 85.6 85.9 0.4 85.4 0.2 88 85.7 86.0 0.4 85.5 0.2 89 86.1 86.4 0.3 86.2 0.1 90 86.2 86.5 0.3 86.2 0.0 91 86.2 86.6 0.5 86.2 0.0 92 86.3 86.7 0.5 86.2 0.1 93 85.5 85.8 0.4 85.3 0.2 94 85.4 85.7 0.4 85.2 0.2 95 85.5 85.8 0.4 85.2 0.4 96 85.5 85.7 0.2 85.2 0.4 97 85.6 85.9 0.4 85.4 0.2 98 85.6 86.0 0.5 85.4 0.2 99 85.4 85.6 0.2 85.1 0.4 100 85.3 85.4 0.1 85.0 0.4 101 85.4 85.6 0.2 85.1 0.4
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Transmittance After Temperature-And- After Alkali Before Humidity-Controlled Test Resistance Test Test Change Change (%) (%) Rate (%) (%) Rate (%) Compara- 1 80.6 78.9 2.1 80.7 0.1 tive 2 80.4 79.2 1.5 80.5 0.1 Exam- 3 80.8 79.2 2.0 80.9 0.1 ple 4 80.6 79.6 1.2 80.5 0.1 5 81.1 78.6 3.1 81.2 0.1 6 80.7 79.0 2.1 80.8 0.1 7 80.4 78.7 2.1 80.6 0.2 8 80.2 79.0 1.5 80.3 0.1 9 80.5 78.7 2.2 80.6 0.1 10 80.3 79.2 1.4 80.4 0.1 11 77.5 75.6 2.5 77.8 0.4 12 79.8 78.1 2.1 80.2 0.5 13 84.5 82.4 2.5 83.5 1.2 14 84.2 82.3 2.3 83.4 1.0 15 84.2 82.5 2.0 83.4 1.0 16 84.0 82.5 1.8 83.3 0.8 17 84.7 82.1 3.1 83.6 1.3 18 84.5 82.2 2.7 83.6 1.1 19 83.2 81.4 2.2 82.5 0.8 20 83.1 81.3 2.2 82.0 1.3 21 83.0 81.3 2.0 81.9 1.3 22 83.2 81.6 1.9 82.2 1.2 23 79.6 77.5 2.6 78.9 0.9 24 80.0 78.1 2.4 79.1 1.1 A 76.4 76.7 0.4 76.5 0.1 B 84.1 84.3 0.2 84.2 0.1
[0144] In all the Examples, the average transmittance after film formation was higher than 85%, and the sheet resistance after film formation was 20 /sq. or lower. Therefore, it was found that a multilayer transparent conductive film having high transmittance and sufficiently low resistance was obtained.
[0145] On the other hand, in all the Comparative Examples, the average transmittance after film formation was 85% or lower, and the sheet resistance after film formation was higher than that of Examples in a comparison between the samples having the same thickness of the Ag film. The reason for this is presumed to be that aggregation of the Ag film occurred in the Ag film.
[0146] In addition, in Comparative Example A, the sheet resistance was 10 /sq. or lower by forming the ITO single layer film having a large thickness of 600 nm. However, the average transmittance was significantly decreased to 76.4%.
[0147] Further, in Comparative Example B, the thickness was 180 nm and the sheet resistance was 10 /sq. or lower by heating the glass substrate to 200 C. However, the average transmittance was 85% or lower.
[0148] In addition, the results of the temperature-and-humidity-controlled test are as follows. In Examples, it was found that the change rates of the transmittance and the sheet resistance after the temperature-and-humidity-controlled test were small, and the environment resistance was high.
[0149] On the other hand, in Comparative Examples other than A and B, the change rate of the transmittance or the sheet resistance after the temperature-and-humidity-controlled test was large, and the environment resistance was insufficient.
[0150] In addition, the results of the alkali resistance test are as follows. In Examples, it was found that the change rates of the transmittance and the sheet resistance after the alkali resistance test were small, and the alkali resistance was high.
[0151] On the other hand, in the samples according to Comparative Examples 13 to 24, the change rates of the transmittance and the sheet resistance after the alkali resistance test were large, and the alkali resistance was insufficient.
[0152] In addition, the results of the patterning test using the etching method are as follows. In Examples, as shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 and
[0153] On the other hand, in Comparative Examples, as shown in Table 8 and
[0154] In addition, the results of observing the surface of the multilayer film by visual inspection after the removal of the resist are as follows. In Examples, a change of the surface was not observed as compared to that before the test. On the other hand, in the multilayer films according to Comparative Examples 13 to 24 in which the GZO film not including Y and Ti was formed as the transparent conductive oxide film, film peeling was observed in places after the removal of the resist.
[0155] In addition, the results of the patterning test using the lift-off method are as follows. In Examples, it was found that a wiring pattern can be accurately formed.
[0156] On the other hand, in the multilayer films according to Comparative Examples 13 to 24 in which the GZO film not including Y and Ti was formed as the transparent conductive oxide film, film peeling was observed in places after the removal of the resist.
[0157] As described above, in Examples, it was found that aggregation of Ag does not occur even in a case where the Ag film is formed to be thin, and a multilayer transparent conductive film having a high transmittance and a low resistance value can be provided.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
[0158] In the multilayer transparent conductive film according to the present invention, transmittance is sufficiently high, electrical resistance is sufficiently low, environment resistance and alkali resistance are high, and over-etching is not likely to occur. Therefore, the multilayer transparent conductive film according to the present invention is suitable as a transparent electrode film of a display, a touch panel, or the like.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0159] 10: MULTILAYER TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE FILM [0160] 11: FIRST TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDE FILM (TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDE FILM) [0161] 12: Ag FILM [0162] 13: SECOND TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDE FILM (TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDE FILM) [0163] 20: SUBSTRATE [0164] 30: MULTILAYER WIRING FILM [0165] 41: RESIST FILM