Cylinder liner for internal combustion engine
10247129 ยท 2019-04-02
Assignee
Inventors
- Garrold A DeGrace (Frankenmuth, MI, US)
- Maurice G Meyer (Fenton, MI, US)
- Paul Boone (Rochester Hills, MI, US)
- Gregory T Naismith (Clarkston, MI, US)
Cpc classification
F02F1/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02F2200/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A cylinder liner for an engine block that includes an inter-bore saw cut includes a first engine block bonding surface, and a second engine block bonding surface that has a lower level of bonding between the cylinder liner and an engine block than the first engine block bonding surface. The second engine block bonding surface extending from an axial end portion of the liner a distance greater than a depth of the saw cut in inter-bore section of the engine block.
Claims
1. A cylinder liner for an engine block that includes an inter-bore saw cut, comprising: a first engine block bonding surface; and a second engine block bonding surface that has a lower level of bonding between the cylinder liner and an engine block than the first engine block bonding surface, the second engine block bonding surface axially extending from an axial end portion of the liner a distance greater than a depth of the saw cut in an inter-bore section of the engine block, wherein the first engine block bonding surface comprises an as-cast surface.
2. The liner of claim 1, wherein the as-cast surface comprises a spiny-lock surface.
3. The liner of claim 1, wherein the as-cast surface comprises a plurality of projections radially extending between about 0.3 to 0.7 millimeters.
4. The liner of claim 1, wherein the second engine block bonding surface comprises a machined surface.
5. The liner of claim 1, wherein the first engine block bonding surface axially extends from the second engine block bonding surface across substantially the remaining axial extent of the liner.
6. The liner of claim 1, wherein the first engine block bonding surface is configured to provide a strong mechanical bond and a high thermal conductivity between the liner and the engine block and wherein the second engine block bonding surface is configured to provide a reduced mechanical bond between the liner and the engine block such that a differing coefficient of thermal expansion between the liner material and the engine block material has a reduced stress transfer from the engine block to the liner during a cooling of the liner material and the engine block material in a casting process.
7. The liner of claim 1, wherein the second engine block bonding surface is configured to permit an axial displacement between the second engine block bonding surface and the engine block during a cooling of the cylinder liner and engine block material.
8. A method of manufacturing a cylinder liner for an engine block that includes an inter-bore saw cut, the method comprising: providing a cylinder liner having a first engine block bonding surface; and removing a portion of the first engine block bonding surface to provide a second engine block bonding surface having a lower level of bonding between the cylinder liner and the engine block than the first engine block bonding surface, wherein the second engine block bonding surface axially extends from an axial end portion of the liner a distance greater than a depth of the saw cut in an inter-bore section of the engine block.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first engine block bonding surface comprises an as-cast surface.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the as-cast surface comprises a spiny-lock surface.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the as-cast surface comprises a plurality of projections radially extending between about 0.3 to 0.7 millimeters.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein removing a portion of the first engine block surface comprises machining a portion of the first engine block surface.
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the first engine block bonding surface extends from the second engine block bonding surface across substantially the remaining axial extent of the liner.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein the first engine block bonding surface provides a strong mechanical bond and a high thermal conductivity between the liner and the engine block and wherein the second engine block bonding surface provides a reduced mechanical bond between the liner and the engine block such that the differing coefficient of thermal expansion between the liner material and the engine block material has a reduced stress transfer from the engine block to the liner during a cooling of the liner material and the engine block material in a casting process.
15. The method of claim 8, wherein the second engine block bonding surface is configured to permit an axial displacement between the second engine block bonding surface and the engine block during a cooling of the cylinder liner and engine block material in a casting process.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(13)
(14) The engine block 100 includes a cooling fluid jacket 106 which is exposed to (open to) the deck surface 110 and is, thus, known as an open deck block. The cooling fluid jacket 106 substantially surrounds the cylinder bores and provides fluid communication channels through which cooling fluid may be circulated to remove and manage heat which may be generated during a combustion process during operation of an engine incorporating the engine block 100.
(15)
(16) As explained above, a problem is known in which cracks may develop in a cylinder liner near the deck surface and adjacent to the inter-bore area. While various attempts have been made to address this problem, none of them have understood the cause and addressed the underlying cause of these cracks. In contrast to previous attempts to address or solve this problem, the inventors studied the cause of the problem, discovered the source of the problem and, as a result, developed a solution which addresses the underlying cause of these cracks. The inventors were then able to solve the problem.
(17) In particular, the inventors studied the manufacturing processes which included a structural analysis that accounted for the heat transfer and differences in coefficients of thermal expansion of the materials involved in the engine block casting process and subsequent process, such as, for example, machining of the bore, deck face, and the like. Through this unique analysis the inventors discovered the stresses and strains which resulted from these process and which are the cause of many cylinder liner failures.
(18)
(19) The inventors, having studied this model, and further understanding that there is a substantial difference in the coefficients of thermal expansion between the cast-iron liner material and the aluminum alloy material and further appreciating that the as-cast surface of the liner provides a strong mechanical bond between the liner and the engine block material, the inventors discovered the cause of the problem. The aluminum alloy has a larger coefficient of thermal expansion than that of cast-iron. This means that the aluminum alloy will tend to shrink more than the cast-iron material as it cools. This has not generally caused problems in engine blocks which included cast in place cylinder liners which do not have an as-cast surface because the aluminum alloy is not as firmly bonded to the cylinder liner. In those situations, the aluminum alloy is free to slide down the surface of cylinder liner which reduces or substantially eliminates the residual stress that may otherwise be placed on the liner from the engine block material. In stark contrast, upon the introduction of cylinder liners having as-cast surfaces, which provide a much stronger structural bond between the cylinder liner and the engine block, the inventors realized that this resulted in the engine block material introducing stress in the cylinder liner. Unlike the non-as-cast surface liners, the potential for residual stress could not be alleviated by the engine block material sliding down the outside of the liner during the cooling process. Thus, cylinder liners having an as-cast surface experience residual stresses which are not present in liners that do not have an as-cast surface.
(20) Further, the inventors realized that the presence of the saw-cut further focused this residual stress in the area of the liner adjacent to the inter-bore saw cut. The removal of material during the machining of the saw-cut enables the residual stress in the material to causes the liner to pivot or hinge radially outward from the cylinder bore. This residual stress tends to favor closing of the saw cut and thereby permits the engine block material and structurally bonded liner to be pulled downwardly and to pivot about the base of the saw-cut radially outward.
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24) While the present description and exemplary embodiment refers to a second engine block bonding surface having a machined surface and a first engine block bonding surface having an as-cast surface, it is to be understood that the present invention includes any type of surfaces so long as the structural bonding between the second engine block bonding surface and the engine block material is less than that of the first engine block bonding surface and the engine block material.
(25)
(26) Further,
(27) For purposes of further comparison and illustration of the advantages of the present invention,
(28) The manufacturing process starts at 1006 where the molten engine block material is introduced into a mold which incorporates the cylinder liner(s). Between 1006 and 1008, the engine block cools to a solid within the mold. During this cooling the stress introduced into the conventional cylinder liner as indicated by line 1000 rises significantly faster than that of the inventive cylinder liner as indicated by lines 1002 and 1004. The engine block is removed from the mold at 1008 and then cools to ambient temperature until 1010. Again, as is clearly illustrated, the residual stress continues to rise significantly higher in the conventional liner 1000 in comparison to that of the inventive liner 1002 and 1004. Next, between 1010 and 1012, the interior surface of the cylinder liner experiences a rough machining operation which removes material from the walls of the cylinder liner and further concentrates the residual stress. This is true especially with the reduction in the ovality in the inventive cylinder liner in comparison with the conventional cylinder liner.
(29) Between 1012 and 1014, the inter-bore section is machined to provide the saw cut and between 1014 and 1016 the interior surface of the cylinder liner is further machined to provide a finish bore surface. As is clearly evident, each progressive step in the manufacturing process results in a continuing increase in residual stress at an end portion of the conventional cylinder liner. In stark contrast, the residual stress in all portions of the inventive cylinder liner is substantially less. In particular, the residual stress in an end portion of the cylinder liner adjacent to the deck face 1004 is substantially reduced.
(30) Viewing
(31)
(32) This description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims.