Deployable sandwich-like shell structural system

Abstract

One embodiment of a deployable structural system having sandwich-like shell stiffness and strength properties is constructed of an outer elastic sheet and an inner elastic sheet connected by a number of substantially rigid webs wherein hinges constitute the connections. The hinge connection spacing dimensions on the inner and outer elastic sheets differ such that the resulting assemblage may be elastically bent into a compact cylindrical configuration. Deployment is achieved through reversal of the bending process and application of sufficient external restraints such that the deployed configuration is structurally stable. Additional application embodiments are described.

Claims

1. A deployable structurally composite cellular shell assemblage, comprising: a. a first elastic sheet, b. a second elastic sheet substantially parallel to said first elastic sheet, c. a plurality of elongated hinges, d. a plurality of substantially rigid elongated webs having at least two elongated edges, each of which is attached in a parallel manner, along both elongated edges, to said first and second elastic sheets by means of said hinges, where the spacing of said hinge connections, as measured on the surface of said first elastic sheet, differs from the spacing of said hinge connections, as measured on the surface of said second elastic sheet, thus sandwiching said webs between said elastic sheets, and e. a first means of transverse restraint, at right angles to said sheets, supporting the ends of said webs; and a second means of longitudinal restraint, at right angles to said hinges and in the plain of said elastic sheets, supporting one edge, parallel to said webs, of both of said elastic sheets, thus providing enhanced structural bending strength and stability to the deployed assemblage described above, whereby the differing spacing of said hinge connections to said first elastic sheet from spacing of said hinge connections to said second elastic sheet enables said sheets and webs to be elastically urged into a substantially circular cylindrical configuration resulting in compact cylindrical stowage of said structural assemblage; with reversal of said sheet stowage and utilization of said support means resulting in deployment, stability and enhanced structural bending strength of said structural assemblage.

Description

DRAWINGSFIGURES

(1) In the drawings, closely related figures have the same number but differing alphabetical suffixes.

(2) FIGS. 1A through 1C illustrate the first embodiment basic elements, geometry and detail of the structural system in the stowed and representative deployed configuration.

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates a method of external supports and restraints which yields a stable deployed structural system.

(4) FIGS. 3A and 3B show the nomenclature utilized for preliminary design calculations for a representative deployed configuration.

(5) FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate cross-sections of stowed and deployed configurations for an overhead door embodiment.

(6) FIG. 5 illustrates a deployed configuration roof closure embodiment cross-section.

(7) FIGS. 6A through 6D illustrate cross-sectional top views of furled and deployed configurations for a wind powered sail embodiment.

DRAWINGSREFERENCE NUMERALS

(8) 11 outer elastic sheet 12 inner elastic sheet 13 typical web 14 typical hinge 15 typical sheet mid-surface radius 21 typical longitudinal support means 22 typical transverse support means 31 outer sheet mid-surface radius 32 inner sheet mid-surface radius 33 web width 34 clockwise angle from normal 35 curved sheet distance 36 flat sheet distance 41 typical curved web 42 mandrel 61 relative wind direction 62 rotatable fairing 63 flexible fairing sheet

EMBODIMENT DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS

First EmbodimentFIGS. 1A Through 2

(9) This embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 1A (the embodiment in the stowed configuration) and FIG. 1B (the embodiment in the deployed configuration). An outer elastic sheet 11 is connected to an inner elastic sheet 12 by a plurality of identical high aspect ratio webs 13 by means of hinges 14. The webs are depicted as flat plates in FIGS. 1A and 1B. However, these could be of curved construction resulting in a more compact stowed configuration. As shown, the stowed sheets are bent into a cylindrical shape (generally circular).

(10) The sheets, 11 and 12, could be comprised of homogenous metallic material or of composite construction such as fiber reinforced polymer (FRP). The webs, 13, are subject to only in-plane stresses due to bending stress relief of the hinges, and may thus be constructed of light homogeneous materials or a FRP wrapped core. The hinges, 14, could be conventional mechanical hinges or constructed of flexible polymer composite. Various methods may be employed for hinge attachment to sheets and webs, including mechanical (rivets or spot welds) or adhesives. Also, the webs may be designed to include the hinge elements so that the only attachments required are web-to-sheets.

(11) FIG. 1C shows a more detailed view of the stowed configuration. A requirement of this embodiment is that the maximum strains in the sheets, 11 and 12, remain within an elastic design criterion of the material comprising the sheets when the embodiment is in the stowed configuration (FIG. 1C). For metallic materials, an appropriate design strain is 80 percent of the material yield strain or the endurance limit strain. For FRP materials subject to prolong strain, an appropriate design strain is the creep-rupture limit which varies from 20 to 50 percent of the ultimate rupture strain, depending on the type of fiber used in the design.

(12) Maximum strain, emax, in a cylindrically bent elastic sheet is given by the following well known relationship:
e max=t/2R,
where t is the thickness and R (15) is a typical radius of curvature of the bent sheet. From this relationship, a design t/R ratio is determined by equating emax with the material design strain, as determined in the preceding paragraph.

(13) For the deployed structure to be statically stable, a means of support must be provided as shown in FIG. 2 where the supports are shown symbolically as arrows. Longitudinal (direction transverse to the hinge axes) restraint is provided by supports 21 applied to the edges of sheets 11 and 12. Transverse (direction normal to sheet 11) restraint is provided by supports 22 applied to the ends of each web. Other embodiment support requirements depend on the specific configuration of the deployed shell.

First EmbodimentDesign ConsiderationsFIG. 3A and FIG. 3B

(14) FIGS. 3A and 3B show dimensions and nomenclature required to illustrate relationships between the stowed and a typical deployed shell configuration. These relationships may be used for preliminary embodiment design use. FIG. 3A shows a cross-section of a stowed shell with circular cylindrical geometry and identically sized webs. FIG. 3B illustrates a typical deployed geometry cross-section where the inner sheet is constrained to be flat. Nearly exact analytical relationships are derived (derivations are too lengthy for inclusion here) for the deployment shown in FIG. 3B as well as another deployment where the outer sheet is constrained to be flat. For other deployed configurations where both inner and outer sheets are curved, numerical method design procedures may be employed.

(15) Referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, the following nomenclature is defined: Ro=mid-surface radius of stowed outer sheet, 31, Ri=mid-surface radius of stowed inner sheet, 32, W=web width (center-hinge to center-hinge), 33, k=Ri/Ro, C=W/(1k.sup.2).

(16) Referring to FIG. 3B, for web angle, a (34), measured clockwise from a normal to 12, distances along the curved and flat surfaces, s(a) (35) and x(a) (36), are, respectively:
s(a)=C{k[sin(a)]+E(k,a)},
x(a)=k[s(a)]
where E(k, angle) is the incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind which may be found in mathematical function tables or calculated numerically.

(17) Web-to-web spacing, and thus number of webs, is independent of the geometry. This spacing is dependent on embodiment design requirements such as magnitude of design lateral loads and overall deployed configuration stiffness.

First EmbodimentConstruction and Operation

(18) Even though the specification of geometric relationships is somewhat complicated, actual embodiment construction principles are quite simple. Once materials and dimensions are chosen, the embodiment is assembled on an armature of the same dimensions as the embodiment stowed dimensions (of the same radius as R (15), FIG. 1C). The edges of both sheets (11 and 12) are first secured to the armature. The webs 13 are assembled to hinges 14. Each web-hinge assembly is then sequentially attached to both sheets as the armature is rotated. Thus, the correct relative web-to-sheet connection dimensions are automatically ensured.

(19) Stowage of the embodiment from the deployed configuration, as illustrated in FIG. 1B, is accomplished by first translating the sheets, 11 and 12, relative to each other so that one of the end webs, 13, is flattened to be nearly parallel to either sheet. A means of torque is then applied to the outer sheet, 11, edge, which is adjacent to the flattened web, thus bending the embodiment into the stowed configuration, FIG. 1A. Deployment is accomplished by reversing the means of torque applied to the embodiment stowed configuration, FIG. 1A, thus straightening the embodiment into the deployed configuration, FIG. 1B. A means of embodiment support and guidance is employed during deployment and stowage.

(20) In the above descriptions, the stowed overall geometry was taken to be generally circular cylindrical. However, this is not an absolute requirement; a variable curvature cylindrical configuration, such as elliptical cylindrical, could be realized through continually variable web connection spacing (i.e., variable k). Although this realization of the embodiment may not be highly useful, it is included as an independent claim.

Additional EmbodimentsFIGS. 4A Through 6D

(21) Among many possible, three additional, embodiments are briefly described. Note that the depictions of these embodiments are not to scale; stowed embodiment configuration may be shown at a more magnified scale for clarification of details.

(22) FIGS. 4A and 4B conceptually illustrate cross-sections of an overhead door embodiment where FIG. 4A shows the stowed door and FIG. 4B shows the deployed door. In this embodiment (as well as all additional embodiments), the webs, 41, are curved for a more compact stowed configuration. In addition, a nearly circular-cylindrical mandrel, 42, is utilized. For clarity, only two webs are shown in FIG. 4A with the remaining stowed webs not shown.

(23) Both sheets, 11 and 12, are attached to the mandrel, thus providing longitudinal (transverse to webs) support to both sheets and providing the means of torque application to the embodiment. The mandrel also provides support to the stowed embodiment. Operation of the door embodiment is accomplished by a means of torque applied to the mandrel which results in rotation of the mandrel (for either stowage or deployment).

(24) A means of lateral support (for example, a track or guide) is provided for the ends of the webs in such a manner that the outer sheet, 11, is flat in the deployed configuration for embodiment stability and a clean weather-side exposure.

(25) A typical door embodiment of dimensions 3 m high by 10 m wide (representative of a small private plane hangar door) was structurally analyzed for 130 km/hr, normal to outer sheet, dynamic pressure wind loading. Results proved that (for thin gauge high strength aluminum used for sheets 11 and 12) the door embodiment was well-behaved with respect to both stiffness and strength.

(26) FIG. 5 conceptually illustrates a cross-section of a deployed roof closure embodiment. This is nearly the same as the overhead door embodiment rotated to a horizontal deployed configuration. The exception is that sheet 11 is curved rather than flat (as in the door embodiment) so that environmental loads such as water and snow are dispelled. This is accomplished by modification of the means of support of the web ends.

(27) The final additional embodiment described is a wind-powered sail embodiment, as illustrated in FIGS. 6A through 6D. These figures are conceptual overhead cross-sectional views of the sail embodiment for various deployed configurations. This embodiment is similar to the previously described embodiments except that the deployed configurations have reversible camber geometry. For all figures, the large arrows, 61, represent the relative wind directions.

(28) For dangerous wind conditions (storms, gales or hurricanes), FIG. 6A illustrates the furled state where the embodiment is in the stowed configuration. Also shown is a rotatable fairing, 62, employed for a more efficient overall airfoil effect.

(29) From the furled state, the embodiment may be deployed to the configuration shown in FIG. 6B, the port tack state. Fairing 62 is simultaneously rotated to the new configuration. Also shown are additional elements: flexible fairing sheets, 63, employed for a more efficient overall airfoil effect. The means of support of the web ends in this embodiment are rotating flexible tracks.

(30) For non-dangerous, but unfavorable wind conditions, FIG. 6C illustrates the feathered state achieved by rotation of the mandrel, 42, and fairing, 62. A means of connection of 42 with said support tracks enables the deployed shell to simultaneously rotate from the port tack state to the configuration shown in FIG. 6C.

(31) The starboard tack state, FIG. 6D, is achieved by additional rotation of 42, 62 and said support tracks which remain attached to 42. The furled state, FIG. 6A is attained by reversal of the sequence described above.

Additional EmbodimentsAdvantages

(32) A number of advantages are evident in the embodiments described above:

(33) (a) Very high stiffness and strength to weight ratios of the deployed configurations enable light weight embodiments to carry large environmental transverse loads, such as those induced by water and wind.

(34) (b) Seamless surfaces of the deployed configurations enable the closure embodiments to be weather tight and capable of forming static pressure boundaries.

(35) (c) Air trapped in the cells of the deployed configurations enables natural insulation of transverse heat transfer in the embodiments.

(36) (d) In the case of the wind sail embodiment, flexibility of the deployed configurations enables the camber of the sail to be easily reversed resulting in rapid course tacks.

(37) (e) Efficient airfoil cross-section shapes enables the wind sail embodiment to generate significant driving force for a wide variety of wind strengths and directions.

CONCLUSION, RAMIFICATIONS AND SCOPE

(38) A deployable sandwich-like shell structural system has been disclosed. This system is simple in concept and construction, yet has many potential uses which take advantage of this system's unique capabilities: it has a compact stowed configuration which is easily and quickly converted to the deployed configuration; in its deployed configuration, it has a very large stiffness to weight ratio which enables applications requiring low weight, deformations and flutter; in its deployed configuration, it has a very high lateral load strength to weight ratio which enables applications requiring low weight and high resistance to lateral environmental loading; in its deployed configuration, it has good natural insulation to transverse heat flow due to air trapped in the internal cells of the shell; in its deployed configuration, it is weather tight and capable, with proper edge sealing, of forming a differential pressure barrier such could be used in an ultra-clean environment boundary; and in its deployed configuration, with proper moveable lateral edge support, curvature of the shell surfaces may be varied or reversed which has application to airfoil design usage.

(39) Although the above discussion contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments, but as merely providing illustrations of some of several embodiments. Thus the scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.