Vanillin having tetramer structure

Abstract

A vanillin having a tetramer structure is revealed, comprising a first monomer, a second monomer, a third monomer, and a fourth monomer. Each of the monomers is constituted by C.sub.8H.sub.8O.sub.3. The vanillin includes a first intermolecular hydrogen bond between the first monomer and the fourth monomer, and a second intermolecular hydrogen bond between the second monomer and the third monomer to stabilize the tetramer structure.

Claims

1. A vanillin having a tetramer structure, comprising a first monomer, a second monomer, a third monomer, a fourth monomer, a first intermolecular hydrogen bond between the first monomer and the fourth monomer, and a second intermolecular hydrogen bond between the second monomer and the third monomer; wherein each of the monomers is constituted by C.sub.8H.sub.8O.sub.3.

2. The vanillin having a tetramer structure as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first intermolecular hydrogen bond is formed between an oxygen atom of a methoxy group of the first monomer and a hydrogen atom of a hydroxyl group of the fourth monomer, and the second intermolecular hydrogen bond is formed between an oxygen atom of a methoxy group of the third monomer and a hydrogen atom of a hydroxyl group of the second monomer.

3. The vanillin having a tetramer structure as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first intermolecular hydrogen bond has a bonding length of 1.875 , and the second intermolecular hydrogen bond has a bonding length of 1.818 .

4. The vanillin having a tetramer structure as claimed in claim 1, wherein the vanillin has characteristics of .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3) : 3.95 (3H, s, C.sub.3OCH.sub.3), 6.20 (1H, br s, OH), 7.09 (1H, d, J=8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.30 (1H, d, J=2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.42 (1H, dd, J=8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 9.76 (1H, s, CHO), and at 295 K, unit cell dimensions: a=14.0368(9) , b=7.8583(5) , c=14.9937(9) , =90, =115.446(1), =90, space group=P2(1), volume=1493.19(16) .sup.3, Z=8, and D.sub.calc=1.354 Mg/m.sup.3.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is an ORTEP drawing of a vanillin according to the present invention;

(2) FIG. 2 is an ORTEP drawing of a neolitacumone B according to the present invention;

(3) FIG. 3 is a DFT theoretical calculation diagram of the vanillin according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

(4) A vanillin having a tetramer structure is disclosed. The vanillin as shown in FIG. 1 is isolated from the stems of N. acuminatissima and comprises a first monomer (1), a second monomer (2), a third monomer (3), a fourth monomer (4), a first intermolecular hydrogen bond (5) (bonding length=1.875 ) between the first monomer (1) and the fourth monomer (4), and a second intermolecular hydrogen bond (6) (bonding length=1.818 ) between the second monomer (2) and the third monomer (3), and wherein Each of the monomers is constituted by C.sub.8H.sub.8O.sub.3 as shown in formula (I).

(5) ##STR00001##

(6) Furthermore, the vanillin has characteristics of:

(7) (i) .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3) : 3.95 (3H, s, C.sub.3OCH.sub.3), 6.20 (1H, br s, OH), 7.09 (1H, d, J=8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.30 (1H, d, J=2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.42 (1H, dd, J=8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 9.76 (1H, s, CHO); and

(8) (ii) at 295 K, unit cell dimensions: a=14.0368(9) , b=7.8583(5) , c=14.9937(9) , =90, =115.446(1), =90, space group=P2(1), volume=1493.19(16) .sup.3, Z=8, and D.sub.calc=1.354 Mg/m.sup.3.

(9) Hereinafter, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Example 1

(10) First, a vanillin was isolated from the stems of N. acuminatissima, and its stereo-chemical structure was further determined by X-ray crystallography.

(11) (a) Extraction and Isolation of Vanillin and Neolitacumone B

(12) The stems (4.0 Kg) of N. acuminatissima were extracted repeatedly with MeOH at room temperature. The combined MeOH extracts were then evaporated and partitioned to yield CHCl.sub.3 and aqueous extracts. The CHCl.sub.3 extract was dried and evaporated to leave a viscous residue. The viscous residue was placed on a silica gel column and eluted with CHCl.sub.3 gradually enriched with MeOH to afford 15 fractions.

(13) Fraction 8 was purified by silica gel chromatography (CHCl.sub.3/MeOH 10:3) to get vanillin (38.0 mg) as a compound of formula (I).

(14) The isolated and vanillin respectively have characteristics as the followings.

(15) Vanillin: .sup.1H-NMR (CDCl3) : 3.95 (3H, s, C3-OCH3), 6.20 (1H, br s, OH), 7.09 (1H, d, J=8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.30 (1H, d, J=2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.42 (1H, dd, J=8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 9.76 (1H, s, CHO).

(16) The structure of molecules plays an especially significant role in determining their chemical properties. Only a slight change in the structure of a biological molecule can completely destroy its usefulness to a cell or may even change the cell from a normal one to cancerous one. As a result, to search the geometric optimization of compound is particularly important.

(17) (b) Production of Single Crystal

(18) Single crystal of vanillin was obtained by recrystallization followed by a crystal-growing process. Ethyl acetate was then slowly added to the mixture until the compound was completely dissolved. Vanillin was recrystallized in MeOH. Magnesium sulfate was then added, and the mixture was filtered while hot. The filtered product was then put into a crystal-growing bottle. Methanol vapor was allowed to slowly diffuse into the crystal-growing bottle until a perfect crystal was produced. The structure of the resulting single crystals was then analyzed by X-ray crystallography. Suitable crystals were selected, and then mounted on thin glass fibers using viscous oil. All measurements were made on a SMART CCD diffract meter with Mo K radiation (=0.7107 ) at 295K. The data was then collected using the co-step scan technique. The cell parameters were determined using all the valid reflections. The intensity data was corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects, and refinement was performed using the empirical absorption correction based on the equivalent reflections. The two structures were solved by direct methods and were refined by full-matrix least-squares data based on F.sup.2. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotopically, and the hydrogen atoms were included in an idealized geometry but not refined. Atomic scattering factors and anomalous dispersion factors were determined by the SHELX program.

(19) (c) Calculation Methods and Input

(20) In an attempt to understand structural features of the vanillin under investigation, all computations were carried out using the B3LYP method included in the Gaussian 03 package software together with the 6-31G* basis set function of the density functional theory (DFT). Carefully selected DFT methods applied with the 6-31* basis set were capable of reliable predicting the available experimental structure for the vanillin. The medium-sized 6-31G* basis set was usually considered sufficient for reliable optimization of geometries. The values of the three-dimensional coordinate obtained from the X-ray structural analysis were used as initial coordinates in the input to the calculation program. Therefore, the objective was to accurately calculate the properties of the vanillin.

(21) (d) Geometry Optimizations

(22) The results of the calculations were used to verify the reasonableness of the input coordinate data. If unreasonable data was used, either the geometric symmetry of the molecules would be destroyed or unusual bond length or bond angle would be produced. Any of these errors would result in the termination of the calculations. It was found that the calculations could achieve convergence much easier, if the input data was closer to the experimental values of the minimal energy points of the molecules. By starting the calculations with the coordinates of the X-ray structural analysis, the convergence of the DFT calculations was achieved in fewer steps. The converged calculations can then provide the optimal geometric bond lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles of the vanillin.

(23) Result

(24) The structure of molecules plays an especially significant role in determining their chemical properties. A slight change in the structure of a biological molecule can completely destroy its usefulness to a cell or may even change the cell from a normal one to cancerous one. As a result, to search the geometric optimization of compound is particularly important. The obtained geometric structure of the vanillin was shown in formula (I) and formula (II). Through structural analysis using X-ray crystallography, the ORTEP diagrams of the vanillin molecules as shown in FIG. 1 and the neolitacumone B as shown in FIG. 2 were also identified. The values of the three-dimensional coordinate obtained from the X-ray structural analysis were used as initial coordinates in the input to the calculation program. As described earlier, the coordinates of the X-ray structural analysis are used as input data to compare the reliabilities and reasonableness of the theoretical methods used in this research. AM 1 semi-empirical method is first used to conduct calculations until convergence is achieved. The geometric optimization is then conducted using quantum chemical DFT modeling at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory has been carried out to investigate the vanillin. The DFT theoretical calculation diagram of the vanillin is shown in FIG. 3. Energies, in au, the predicted conformation of the vanillin is 2141.30629. Comparisons of theoretical and experimental data for bond lengths of the vanillin from the X-ray crystallography structural analysis and DFT calculations are shown in Tables 1.

(25) TABLE-US-00001 TABLES 1 crystallographic data and optimized structure of natural product vanillin located using B3LYP/6-31G* calculations for atomic bond lengths () Atomic bond Crystallographic lengths () data B3LYP/6-31G* O1-C1 1.339(3) 1.360 O2-C7 1.435(3) 1.427 O4-C9 1.342(3) 1.341 O5-C15 1.433(3) 1.353 O7-C17 1.345(3) 1.544 O8-C23 1.424(3) 1.424 O10-C25 1.348(3) 1.344 O11-C31 1.425(2) 1.426 C1-C6 1.375(3) 1.392 C2-C3 1.369(3) 1.382 C4-05 1.372(3) 1.399 C5-C6 1.376(4) 1.396 C9-C10 1.408(3) 1.423 C11-C12 1.394(3) 1.410 C12-C16 1.461(4) 1.465 C17-C22 1.384(3) 1.393 C18-C19 1.374(3) 1.381 C20-C21 1.382(3) 1.402 C21-C22 1.371(4) 1.393 C25-C26 1.406(3) 1.422 C27-C28 1.383(3) 1.410 C28-C32 1.467(4) 1.468 O2-C2 1.356(5) 1.369 O3-C8 1.193(3) 1.226 O5-C10 1.350(3) 1.552 O6-C16 1.201(3) 1.225 O8-C18 1.361(3) 1.370 O9-C24 1.198(3) 1.552 O11-C26 1.361(3) 1.368 O12-C32 1.204(3) 1.221 C1-C2 1.405(3) 1.417 C3-C4 1.392(3) 1.410 C4-C8 1.462(3) 1.466 C9-C14 1.378(4) 1.401 C10-C11 1.371(3) 1.383 C12-C13 1.376(3) 1.399 C13-C14 1.396(4) 1.392 C17-C18 1.399(3) 1.420 C19-C20 1.394(3) 1.412 C20-C24 1.454(4) 1.460 C25-C30 1.371(3) 1.398 C26-C27 1.368(3) 1.384 C28-C29 1.373(3) 1.399 C29-C30 1.379(4) 1.392 O3-H10A 1.789 1.875 O9-H4A 1.766 1.818

(26) The calculation of the vanillin that is in closest agreement with the experiment is also a molecule predicted by DFT calculations. In theoretical calculation analysis, four vanillin molecules (as shown in FIG. 2) of two intermolecular hydrogen bond lengths (O3-H10A and O9-H4A) were 1.875 and 1.818 , respectively. Locating the position of the hydrogen atom in the two intermolecular hydrogen bonds, they give unambiguous information on the existence and strength of the interaction. The density functional method calculations have shown that the two intermolecular hydrogen bonds significantly increase the structural stability. This increase in stability may be attributed to induction. The result is also in agreement with our X-ray experimental data which give hydrogen bond lengths 1.789 and 1.766 , respectively. This result is well established in predicting accuracy for two intermolecular hydrogen bonds involves four vanillin molecules. Table 2 provides the bond angles obtained from X-ray crystallography structural analysis and theoretical calculations.

(27) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Atomic torsion angle Crystallographic () data B3LYP/6-31G* C2-O2-C7 117.1(2) 118.0 C10-O5-C15 117.1(2) 117.7 C18-O8-C23 117.6(2) 118.0 C26-O11-C31 116.9(2) 118.0 O1-C1-C6 118.6(2) 120.6 O1-C1-C2 122.1(2) 118.9 C6-C1-C2 119.3(2) 120.5 O2-C2-C3 126.3(2) 126.9 O2-C2-C1 114.1(2) 113.1 C3-C2-C1 119.7(2) 114.2 C2-C3-C4 120.6(2) 119.5 C5-C4-C3 119.2(2) 120.2 C5-C4-C8 119.9(2) 120.2 C3-C4-C8 120.9(2) 119.6 C4-C5-C6 120.9(2) 120.4 C1-C6-C5 120.3(2) 119.3 O3-C8-C4 126.9(2) 123.9 O4-C9-C14 118.9(2) 118.6 O4-C9-C10 121.4(2) 122.3 C14-C9-C10 119.7(2) 119.1 O5-C10-C11 126.8(2) 125.5 O5-C10-C9 114.0(2) 114.4 C11-C10-C9 119.2(2) 120.1 C10-C11-C12 120.3(2) 120.3 C13-C12-C11 120.1(2) 119.7 C13-C12-C16 119.4(2) 120.8 C11-C12-C16 120.6(2) 119.5 C14-C13-C12 120.0(2) 120.2 C13-C14-C9 120.7(2) 120.5 O6-C16-C12 126.3(3) 124.4 O7-C17-C22 118.6(2) 120.1 O7-C17-C18 121.7(4) 119.6 C22-C17-C18 119.7(2) 120.3 O8-C18-C19 126.1(2) 126.7 O8-C18-C17 114.1(2) 113.1 C19-C18-C17 119.8(2) 120.1 C18-C19-C20 120.1(2) 119.4 C21-C20-C19 119.6(2) 120.3 C21-C20-C24 119.6(2) 119.7 C19-C20-C24 120.8(2) 120.1 C22-C21-C20 120.6(2) 120.3 C21-C22-C17 120.1(2) 119.6 O9-C24-C20 126.8(3) 124.5 O10-C25-C30 118.6(2) 118.9 O10-C25-C26 121.4(3) 121.7 C30-C25-C26 120.0(2) 119.4 O11-C26-C27 126.1(2) 122.0 O11-C26-C25 114.5(2) 114.1 C27-C26-C25 119.4(2) 120.0 C26-C27-C28 120.2(2) 120.1 C29-C28-C27 119.9(2) 119.7 C29-C28-C32 119.6(2) 120.3 C27-C28-C32 120.4(2) 119.9 C28-C29-C30 120.3(2) 120.4 C25-C30-C29 120.2(2) 120.3 O12-C32-C28 125.9(3) 125.4

(28) Table 3 provides the crystallographic data collected during this study. The overall B3LYP/6-31G* calculation of the molecular structures of the vanillin are in excellent agreement with experimental data.

(29) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 crystallographic data Vanillin Empirical formula C.sub.8H.sub.8O.sub.3 Formula weight 152.14 Diffractometer used BRUKER, SMART ApexCCD T (K) 295(2) Wavelength 0.71073 Crystal system Monoclinic Space group P2(1) Unit cell dimensions a = 14.0368(9) b = 7.8583(5) c = 14.9937(9) = 90 = 115.446(1) = 90 Volume(.sup.3) 1493.19(16) Z (atoms/unit cell) 8 D.sub.calc 1.354 Mg/m.sup.3 Absorption coefficient 0.104 mm.sup.1 F (000) 640 Crystal size 0.45 0.37 0.15 mm.sup.3 range for data collection 1.50 to 27.50 Index ranges h (18 to 18) Index ranges k (10 to 10) 1 (19 to 19) Reflection collection 15003 Independent reflection 6722(R(int) = 0.0302 Completeness to = 27.50 100.0% Absorption correction Semi-empirical Max. and min. transmission 0.9845 and 0.9546 Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F.sup.2 Data/restraints/parameters 6722/1/409 GOF on F.sup.2 1.106 Final R indices [I>2(I)] R1 = 0.0548 WR2 = 0.1103 R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0716 WR2 = 0.1194 Absolute structure 1.4(9) parameter Largest diff. peak/hole [e 0.139/0.186 .sup.3]

(30) In summary, two intermolecular hydrogen bond lengths of four vanillin molecules are determined and are close to the experimental data of the X-ray crystallography. The result therefore reveals that the four vanillin molecules of two intermolecular hydrogen bonds in crystal structure are essential for formation of strong hydrogen bond. Moreover, it is shown that the intermolecular hydrogen bonding plays a determinant role in the conformational behavior of the molecules. These two intermolecular hydrogen bonds result in a high thermodynamic and structural stability. The calculations also show that the vanillin is all located at the stable, minimal point of the potential energy surface. Accordingly, the vanillin having tetramer structure was first identified herein. The result suggests that the tetramer structure may affect the ability of vanillin molecules passing through the cell membrane, which provides a different view of designing vanillin related drugs.