Fault-tolerant modular permanent magnet assisted synchronous reluctance motor and modular winding design method

Abstract

The present invention relates to a fault-tolerant modular permanent magnet assisted synchronous reluctance motor (PMaSynRM) and provides a modular winding connection method. The modular winding connection is to change the positions of inlet and outlet coils based on the slot electrical potential star vectogram. Then, each module has a separate set of winding and the left and right relative distribution will be adopted on the winding connection. The invention has the advantages of modularization in structure, high independence between the modules, effectively avoiding overlapping of magnetic lines between the modules, and improving fault tolerance and reliability of the motor. The invention has the advantages of modularization in structure, high independence between the modules, magnetic decoupling between the modules, and improvement of fault tolerance and reliability of the motor.

Claims

1. A fault-tolerant modular permanent magnet assisted synchronous reluctance motor (PMaSynRM) comprising a modular stator and an asymmetric rotor, wherein the modular stator includes a stator iron core, armature windings, non-magnetic conductors, and a plurality of teeth and slots in the circumferential direction, wherein the modular stator comprises at least one module, each of the at least one module formed between two circumferentially adjacent non-magnetic conductor distributed along the circumference; the slots closest to both sides of the non-magnetic conductor are shifting circumferentially away from the non-magnetic conductor; the rotor includes rotor iron core, flux barriers and permanent magnets; the flux barrier angles are different in each pole and the flux barrier angles of adjacent poles are also different; and the permanent magnets are inserted in the flux barriers and the N poles and the S poles of the permanent magnets adjacent in the circumferential direction are alternately arranged; and wherein slots a slots b are configured as closest to both sides of the non-magnetic conductor, and comprise different shifting angles, and wherein the remaining slots have the same slot spacing.

2. The fault-tolerant module PMaSynRM of claim 1, wherein each modular is connected by a separate three-phase distributed winding, wherein said three-phase distributed winding comprises a single layer or a double layer.

3. The fault-tolerant module PMaSynRM of claim 1, wherein the clockwise flux barrier angles along the reference module are $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta +\frac{n-1}{2}\theta ,$ the counterclockwise flux barrier angles along with the reference module: $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta -\frac{n-1}{2}\theta ,$ p=n, when the number of rotor poles pair p is an odd number and the flux barrier angle β of any modular is selected as the reference, and wherein the clockwise flux barrier angles along the reference module are $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta +\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)\theta ,\beta ,\beta -\theta ,\beta -2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta -\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)\theta ,$ p=n, when the number of rotor poles pair p is an even number.

4. The fault-tolerant module PMaSynRM of claim 1, wherein the shifting angles of slot a and slot b are θ.sub.1 and θ.sub.2, and wherein the specific values of θ.sub.1 and θ.sub.2 are set to 2.2 degrees and 2 degrees, respectively.

5. A method for a modular winding design in the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM comprises the following steps: Step 1: Providing the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM comprising a modular stator and an asymmetric rotor, wherein the modular stator includes a stator iron core, armature windings, non-magnetic conductors and a plurality of teeth and slots in the circumferential direction, and wherein wherein the modular stator comprises at least one module, each of the at least one module formed between circumferentially adjacent non-magnetic conductor distributed along the circumference; the slots closest to both sides of the non-magnetic conductor are shifting circumferentially away from the non-magnetic conductor; the rotor includes rotor iron core, flux barriers and permanent magnets; the flux barrier angles are different in each pole and the flux barrier angles of adjacent poles are also different; and the permanent magnets are inserted in the flux barriers and the N poles and the S poles of the permanent magnets adjacent in the circumferential direction are alternately arranged; Step 2: Selecting the appropriate number of modules according to the numbers of slots and poles of the PMaSynRM with distributed winding, wherein the number of stator slots contained in each module is greater than or equal to 2 m, m≥3; Step 3: Splitting the windings based on the slot electrical potential star vectogram, wherein each module is guaranteed to have an independent set of windings and the set of windings only uses stator slots in the same module, and wherein in order not to change the winding factor of the motor, the winding pitch is the same as the conventional connection and the left and right relative distribution will be adopted on the winding connection; and Step 4: Inserting the non-magnetic conductors between the modules to achieve isolation in order to realize the modular design of the motor stator.

6. The method for a modular winding design in the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM of claim 5, wherein each modular is connected by a separate three-phase distributed winding, wherein said three-phase distributed winding comprises a single layer or a double layer, and wherein the modular winding is connected based on the slot electrical potential star vectogram.

7. The method for a modular winding design in the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM of claim 5, wherein the integer slot distributed winding is adopted in the PMaSynRM, and the relationship of slot and pole satisfies q=S/(2*p*m) and q is an integer, wherein S is the number of stator slots, and p is the number of pole pairs, m≥3.

8. The method for a modular winding design in the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM of claim 5, wherein the clockwise flux barrier angles along the reference module are $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta +\frac{n-1}{2}\theta ,$ the counterclockwise flux barrier angles along with the reference module: $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta -\frac{n-1}{2}\theta ,$ p=n, when the number of rotor poles pair p is an odd number and the flux barrier angle β of any modular is selected as the reference, and wherein the clockwise flux barrier angles along the reference module are $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta +\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)\theta ,\beta ,\beta -\theta ,\beta -2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta -\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)\theta ,$ p=n, when the number of rotor poles pair p is an even number.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The invention will be explained in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic view in cross-section of the module PMaSynRM according to the invention;

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic view in cross-section of the stator of the module PMaSynRM;

(4) FIG. 3 is a schematic view in cross-section of the rotor of the module PMaSynRM;

(5) FIG. 4 is a modular winding connection method according to the invention;

(6) FIG. 5 is a conventional winding connection method of PMaSynRM;

(7) FIG. 6 is a flux density distribution of conventional PMaSynRM under the faulty set winding is disconnected;

(8) FIG. 7 is a flux density distribution of proposed modular PMaSynRM under module II fault conditions;

(9) FIG. 8 is the linkage waveforms of the phase B and phase C of conventional PMaSynRM under health condition and A phase open circuited;

(10) FIG. 9 is the linkage waveforms of the phase B and phase C of proposed PMaSynRM under health condition and A phase open circuited;

(11) FIG. 10 is the linkage waveforms of phase B and phase C of conventional PMaSynRM under health condition and A phase short-circuited;

(12) FIG. 11 is the linkage waveforms of the phase B and phase C of proposed PMaSynRM under health condition and A phase short-circuited;

(13) FIG. 12 is the average torque and torque ripple under different θ.sub.1;

(14) FIG. 13 is the average torque and torque ripple under different θ.sub.2;

(15) FIG. 14 is the torque waveform of each module of the proposed PMaSynRM;

(16) In the figure, 1: Stator; 2: Rotor; 3: Armature winding; 4: Non-magnetic conductor; 5: Flux barrier; 6: Permanent magnet; 2-1: Rotor core; 2-2: Flux barrier M2; 2-3: Flux barrier M3; 2-4: Flux barrier M1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(17) The proposed fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM and its modular winding connection method will be described in detail referring to the following figure. FIG. 1 is an example of a PMaSynRM of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM includes a modular stator (1), an asymmetric rotor (2), armature windings (3), non-magnetic conductors (4), flux barriers (5) and permanent magnets (6). In FIG. 2, the modular stator (1) includes stator iron core (1-1), armature windings (3), non-magnetic conductors (4) and a plurality of teeth and slots in the circumferential direction. Moreover, slots (1-2) and (1-3) closest to both sides of the nonmagnetic conductor (4) are shifting circumferentially away from the non-magnetic conductor (4). The rotor includes rotor iron core (2-1), flux barriers (5) and permanent magnets (6) in FIG. 3. In addition, the permanent magnets (6) are inserted in the flux barriers and the N poles and the S poles of the permanent magnets adjacent in the circumferential direction are alternately arranged. As shown in FIG. 4, each modular is connected by a separate three-phase distributed winding and the left and right relative distribution will be adopted on the winding connection. Hence, the isolation between the modules will be implemented to improve the fault-tolerant in the PMaSynRM.

(18) The above-mentioned flux barrier 5 includes a flux barrier M22-2 in Module II, a flux barrier M32-3 in Module III and a flux barrier M12-4 in Module I.

(19) In the illustration above, the stator consists of three modules, each module contains 12 stator slots. The rotor consists of six double-layer U-shaped flux barriers with ferrite material inserted. Each module is isolated by two non-magnetic conductors (4) distributed along the circumference.

(20) A method for a modular winding design in the fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM comprises the following steps:

(21) Step 1: The fault-tolerant modular PMaSynRM needs to be designed and it includes a modular stator (1) and an asymmetric rotor (2). The modular stator (1) includes stator iron core (1-1), armature windings (3), non-magnetic conductors (4) and a plurality of teeth and slots in the circumferential direction. Each module is formed by two non-magnetic conductors (4) distributed along the circumference. Moreover, slots closest to both sides of the nonmagnetic conductor (4) are shifting circumferentially away from the non-magnetic conductor (4). The rotor includes rotor iron core (2-1), flux barriers (5) and permanent magnets (6). Flux barrier angles are different in each pole and the flux barrier angles of adjacent poles are also different. In addition, the permanent magnets (6) are inserted in the flux barriers and the N poles and the S poles of the permanent magnets adjacent in the circumferential direction are alternately arranged.

(22) Step 2: Selecting the appropriate number of module unit according to the numbers of slots and poles of the PMaSynRM with distributed winding. Moreover, the number of stator slots contained in each module is greater than or equal to 2 m, m≥3.

(23) Step 3: Splitting the windings based on the slot electrical potential star vectogram. Moreover, each module is guaranteed to have an independent set of windings and the set of windings only uses stator slots in the same module. In order not to change the winding factor of the motor, the winding pitch is the same as the conventional connection.

(24) Step 4: In order to realize the modular design of the motor stator, the non-magnetic conductors (4) are inserted between the modules to achieve isolation.

(25) As shown in FIG. 3, the motor includes rotor iron core 2-1 and flux barrier 5 which contains flux barrier M22-2 in the Module II, a flux barrier M32-3 in the Module III and a flux barrier M12-4 in the Module I. When the number of rotor poles pair p is an odd number and the flux barrier angle β of any modular is selected as the reference, the clockwise flux barrier angles along the reference module are:

(26) $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta +\frac{n-1}{2}\theta ,$
the counterclockwise flux barrier angles along with the reference module:

(27) $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta -\frac{n-1}{2}\theta ,$
p=n. Similarly, the clockwise flux barrier angles along the reference module are

(28) $\beta +\theta ,\beta +2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta +\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)\theta ,\beta ,\beta -\theta ,\beta -2\theta \mathrm{.Math.}\beta -\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)\theta ,$
p=n, when the number of rotor poles pair p is an even number. The motor is composed of n-module (n≥3), and a non-conductive magnet (4) is disposed between adjacent modules.

(29) The connection of the windings is usually chosen to be a single layer or a double layer winding. The coil pitch of the double winding is adjustable compared with the single layer. Hence, appropriate short pitch factor can be used to weaken back electromotive force (EMF) harmonics and improve the electromagnetic performance of the motor. In order to further illustrate the method of the present invention, a PMaSynRM with the modular winding connection is compared with a convention PMaSynRM motor. FIG. 5 shows the cross section of PMaSynRM with the conventional winding connection. FIG. 6 shows a flux density distribution of conventional PMaSynRM under the faulty set winding is disconnected. The magnetic circuits are coupled to each other due to the traditional distributed winding connection. Therefore, it has a large impact on other phases even if the fault occurs on one phase.

(30) FIG. 7 shows a flux density distribution of proposed modular PMaSynRM under module II fault conditions. It can be seen that Module I and Module III are basically unaffected when Module II has failed. Moreover, Module I and Module III can still maintain normal operation due to the design of modular stator and the connection of modular independent winding.

(31) FIG. 8 and FIG. 9 show the linkage waveforms of the phase B and phase C of conventional and proposed PMaSynRM under health condition and A phase open circuited, respectively. As shown in FIG. 8, the flux linkages of the phase B and phase C are distorted and the phase-to-phase coupling is large when the A phase is open circuit fault. However, the flux linkages of module I and module III in the proposed PMaSynRM are still consistent with the normal operation when module II is open circuit fault in FIG. 9. That is to say that the magnetic circuits between the modules are relatively independent and realize the decoupling between the modules.

(32) FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 show the linkage waveforms of phase B and phase C of conventional and proposed PMaSynRM under health condition and A phase short-circuited, respectively. As shown in FIG. 10, the phase-to-phase influence of the PMaSynRM with a conventional winding is large when A phase short-circuited, which similar to open circuit failure.

(33) FIG. 11 shows that the PMaSynRM with a modular distribution winding proposed by the present invention has almost no influence between the flux linkages in the event of a short circuit fault. It verifies the PMaSynRM achieves independence between modules and improves the fault tolerance performance by adopting the method of highly fault-tolerant modular winding connection proposed by the present invention.

(34) FIG. 12 and FIG. 13 show the average torque and torque ripple under different θ1 and θ2. Moreover, slots closest to both sides of the non-magnetic conductor (4) have different shifting angles, and the remaining slots have the same slot spacing (as shown in FIG. 2). As shown in FIG. 12, the average torque increase when the θ1 increases from 0 to 2.5, nevertheless, the average torque slightly decreased when the θ1 increases from 2.5 to 3. Besides, the torque ripple decrease when the θ1 increases from 0 to 2.2, nevertheless, the torque ripple increases when the θ1 increases from 2.2 to 3. The θ1 can be selected as 2.2 by considering the average torque and torque ripple simultaneously. Similarly, the average torque increase when the θ2 increases from 0 to 1.2, nevertheless, the average torque decreased when the θ2 increases from 1.2 to 3. Besides, the torque ripple decreases when the θ2 increases from 0 to 2.6, nevertheless, the torque ripple increases when the θ1 increases from 2.6 to 3. Hence, the θ2 is chosen as 2.

(35) FIG. 14 shows the torque waveform of each module of the proposed PMaSynRM. The torque generated by each module has a certain phase difference because the flux barrier angle of each module is different (θ≠0). Furthermore, the torque ripple of each module cancels each other and hence the torque ripple is effectively suppressed.

(36) While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel embodiments described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the embodiments described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the inventions.