ANION-DOPED METAL OXIDE

20240238754 ยท 2024-07-18

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    The present disclosure relates to a material comprising an oxide of an alkaline earth metal, wherein the oxide of the alkaline earth metal is doped with an anion. In particular embodiments, the material comprises MgO doped with an anion selected from the group consisting of chloride, sulfate, phosphate and any mixtures thereof. The present disclosure also relates to a method for preparing the material, a method for adsorbing CO2 from an environment and the use of the material to adsorb CO2 from an environment.

    Claims

    1. A material comprising an anion-doped alkaline earth metal oxide.

    2. The material according to claim 1, wherein the alkaline earth metal is selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba and any mixture thereof.

    3. The material according to claim 1, wherein the anion is selected from the group consisting of halide, sulfate, nitrate, phosphate and any mixture thereof.

    4. The material according to claim 1, further comprising water.

    5. The material according to claim 1, wherein the material is in the form of nanofibers, flakes, rods, sheets or any mixture thereof.

    6. A method for preparing the material of claim 1, comprising the step of contacting a hydroxide salt of an alkaline earth metal with a second salt of the alkaline earth metal.

    7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the second salt of the alkaline earth metal is not the same as the hydroxide salt of the alkaline earth metal.

    8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the ratio between the hydroxide salt of the alkaline earth metal and the second salt of the alkaline earth metal is in the range of about 99.9:0.1 to about 80:20 by weight.

    9. The method according to claim 6, wherein the contacting step is performed in a solvent.

    10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the solvent comprises acetic acid, water, or a mixture thereof.

    11. The method according to claim 6, wherein the contacting step further comprises a polymer.

    12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the polymer is polyvinyl acetate or polyacrylonitrile.

    13. The method according to claim 11, wherein the ratio between the hydroxide salt of the alkaline earth metal and the polymer is in the range of about 1:5 to about 1:20 by weight.

    14. The method according to claim 6, further comprising the step of forming the material into fibres.

    15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the forming step is performed by electrospinning.

    16. The method according to claim 9, further comprising the step of removing the solvent.

    17. The method according to claim 6, further comprising the step of calcining the material.

    18. The method according to claim 6, further comprising the step of grinding the material into a powder.

    19. The method according to claim 6, further comprising the step of aging the material.

    20. (canceled)

    21. A method for adsorbing CO.sub.2 from an environment, the method comprising the step of contacting the material of claim 1 with the environment.

    22. (canceled)

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

    [0109] The accompanying drawings illustrate a disclosed embodiment and serve to explain the principles of the disclosed embodiment. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed for purposes of illustration only, and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.

    [0110] FIG. 1 refers to graphs showing the comparison of CO.sub.2 adsorption in 1%, 5% and 10% doped samples of FIG. 1a: Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples, FIG. 1b: SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO samples, and FIG. 1c: PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO samples.

    [0111] FIG. 2 refers to graphs showing the CO.sub.2 uptake capacity after 6 months of aging of FIG. 2a(i): 1% Cl.sup.? doped MgO, FIG. 2a(ii): 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO and FIG. 2a(iii): 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO, FIG. 2b(i): 1% SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO, FIG. 2b(ii): 5% SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO and FIG. 2b(iii) 10% SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO and FIG. 2c(i) 1% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO, FIG. 2c(ii) 5% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO and FIG. 2c(iii) 10% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO.

    [0112] FIG. 3 refers to graphs showing the comparison of FIG. 3a: XRD data of 1%, 5% and 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO electrospun sorbent samples; FIG. 3b: magnification of the broader peaks 2?=10?-35? associated with hydrates in the samples with increasing Cl percentage; FIG. 3c: XRD analysis data of 1%, 5% and 10% SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO electrospun sorbent samples; FIG. 3d: magnification of peaks 2?=10?-35? associated with hydrates related to SO.sub.4.sup.2? in the samples with increasing SO.sub.4.sup.2? percentage: FIG. 3e: XRD analysis data of 1%, 5% and 10% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO electrospun samples; FIG. 3f: Magnification of peaks 2?=10?-35? associated with hydrates related to PO.sub.4.sup.3? in the samples with increasing PO.sub.4.sup.3? percentage. The sorbent samples were calcinated at 300? C., having a peak shift of (2 0 0), (1 1 1) and (1 1 1), (2 0 0) peak broadening and shifting.

    [0113] FIG. 4 refers to SEM images of sorbent samples after calcination at 300? C. FIG. 4A: Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample, FIG. 4B: SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped sorbent sample and FIG. 4C: PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent sample, where a, b and c refer to 1%, 5% and 10% dopants in each sample. Scale bar represents 1 ?m.

    [0114] FIG. 5 refers to: FIG. 5a: comparison of CO.sub.2 adsorption of the 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples calcined at 300? C., 500? C. and 700? C., FIG. 5b: comparison of XRD analysis of the structures of 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples calcinated at 300? C., 500? C. and 700? C. for 2 hours, FIG. 5c: SEM image of the 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample calcinated at 500? C., and FIG. 5d: SEM image of the 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample calcinated at 700? C. at high magnification. Scale bar represents 10 ?m.

    [0115] FIG. 6 refers to graphs showing BET analysis adsorption-desorption curves of the FIG. 6a: 1% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample, FIG. 6b: 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample and FIG. 6c: 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample.

    [0116] FIG. 7 refers to graphs showing the CO.sub.2 gas sensing analysis for the 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample that was found to have a high BET surface area

    [0117] FIG. 8 refers to CO.sub.2 adsorption/desorption curves of 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample over 10 cycles at 30? C. (Adsorption condition: 30? C., 1 atm, 100% pure CO.sub.2, 1.5 hours. Desorption condition: 30? C., 1 atm, 100% pure N.sub.2, 1 hour).

    EXAMPLES

    [0118] Non-limiting examples of the invention will be further described in greater detail by reference to specific Examples, which should not be construed as in any way limiting the scope of the invention.

    Materials and Methods

    [0119] For sample synthesis, analytical grade polyvinyl acetate (PVA) (MW 89,000-98,000, 99+% hydrolyzed) and as the precursor, reagent grade Mg(OH).sub.2 95% were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Analytical grade glacial acetic acid (AA) 99.8% was purchased from Scharlab (Barcelona, Spain). Magnesium chloride (MgCl.sub.2), magnesium phosphate 98+% (Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2) and magnesium sulphate (MgSO.sub.4) analytical grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA), Acros Organics (The Hague, Netherlands) and Shanghai Macklin Biochemicals Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China), respectively. All the chemicals were used without further purification. The water utilized in the experiments was deionized water (18 M?.Math.cm).

    Instrumentation and Characterization

    [0120] X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were conducted on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) with CuK? radiation of 1.54 ? to evaluate powder's composition and phase. The scanning angle was adjusted between 2? angles 10? to 140? with the X-ray generator running at applied voltage 40 kV and current 25 mA. CO.sub.2 capture behaviour was examined using a Thermogravimetric analyser (TGA) TGA Q50 analyser (TA Instruments, New Castle, Delaware, USA). Surface structure and morphology were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) JEOL JSM-7600F (JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The porosity of the samples was studied by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) ASAP 2020 Specific Surface Analyzer (Micrometrics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, Georgia USA). Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) test condition was in low pressure and 200? C. using 0.5 g of powder samples. To study the CO.sub.2 gas sensing properties the prepared sensor was electrically connected to a Keithley 2400 Source meter (Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) and measured the properties.

    Evaluation of CO.SUB.2 .Adsorption Capacity

    [0121] CO.sub.2 capture capacity was examined by performing a CO.sub.2 adsorption experiment, using a Q50 (TA instruments, New Castle, Delaware, USA), by loading 5 to 8 mg of the sorbent (anion-doped MgOMg(OH).sub.2H.sub.2OCO.sub.2 quaternary system) to a platinum (Pt) pan in the TGA unit. To avoid errors caused by impurities such as pre-adsorbed species, atmospheric CO.sub.2, water, and other impurities, samples were subjected to pre-calcination at 150? C. for 60 minutes under a flow of high purity N.sub.2 (40 mL min.sup.?1) with a ramp rate of 10? C. min.sup.?1. The temperature was then lowered to the desired adsorption temperature at a rate of 10? C. min.sup.?1, the gas was switched from N.sub.2 to CO.sub.2 with a constant flow of high purity CO.sub.2 (1 atm, 40 mL min.sup.?1), and the CO.sub.2 adsorption uptake was measured for 1.5 hours. The CO.sub.2 levels in TGA measurements approached a near plateau when the testing duration reached 1.5 hours, and adsorption was at the maximum CO.sub.2 capture capacity.

    Sample Preparation for Gas Sensing

    [0122] Alpha-terpineol was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) as the binder and 0.01 g of Mg(OH).sub.2 powder was mixed 0.01 mL of alpha-terpineol. Then, this mixture was coated on the electrode of the source meter using screen printing. Subsequently, the samples were dried at 60? C. for 30 minutes. Finally, to remove the remaining solvents, the samples were heat-treated at 250? C. for 1 hour.

    Gas Sensing Test

    [0123] To study the CO.sub.2 gas sensing properties of the sorbent, interdigitated Titanium (Ti) and Platinum (Pt) electrodes were deposited by direct current (DC) sputtering on the surfaces with thicknesses of 50 nm and 200 nm, respectively. The prepared sensor was electrically connected to a Keithley 2400 Source meter for the gas sensing measurements. Gas sensing characteristics were investigated using a horizontal-quartz heating chamber at a total flow of 500 sccm. Dynamic sensing data were recorded under a constant DC bias of 1 V. Output resistances were obtained in the presence of target gas (Rg) and air (Ra), and the sensor's response was defined as Ra/Rg. The CO.sub.2 sensing properties of the sorbent was studied by testing in 50-5000 ppm CO.sub.2 gas at different temperatures between 25? C.-300? C.

    Example 1: Synthesis of the Sorbents

    Preparation of PVA Solution

    [0124] Aqueous polyvinyl acetate (PVA) (5% w/w) solution was first prepared by dissolving PVA powder in deionized water, at 90? C. for 2 hours. The solution was then cooled to room temperature (RT) and stirred continuously for another 12 hours.

    Preparation 1 (PVA/Mg(OH).sub.2/MgCl.sub.2 solutions (1% MgCl.sub.2, 5% MgCl.sub.2, 10% MgCl.sub.2))

    [0125] 1% Cl.sup.? solution was prepared by dissolving 0.0025 g MgCl.sub.2 and 0.2475 g Mg(OH).sub.2 in 5 mL acetic acid via sonication in a water bath at 40? C. for 1 hour. Then, the solution was mixed with the 5% PVA as prepared above at a volume ratio of 15:100 (0.750 mL to 5 mL), with further sonication in a water bath at 40? C. for 20 minutes to eliminate precipitation. The 5% Cl.sup.? solution was prepared by using 0.0125 g MgCl.sub.2 and 0.2375 g Mg(OH).sub.2, and the 10% Cl.sup.? solution was prepared by using 0.025 g MgCl.sub.2 and 0.225 g Mg(OH).sub.2, followed by a similar procedure for the 1% Cl.sup.? sample described above.

    Preparation 2 (PVA/Mg(OH).sub.2/MgSO.sub.4 Solutions (1% MgSO.sub.4, 5% MgSO.sub.4, 10% MgSO.sub.4))

    [0126] 1% SO.sub.4.sup.2? solution was prepared by using similar weights as mentioned for Preparation 1, but MgSO.sub.4 was used instead of MgCl.sub.2. The measured samples were dissolved in 4 mL acetic acid and 2 mL deionized water via sonication in a water bath at 30? C. for 1 hour to prepare. The solution was then mixed with 5% PVA as prepared above at a 15:100 ratio (0.750 mL to 5 mL), with the aid of sonication in a water bath at 30? C. for 20 minutes to eliminate precipitation. Similarly, the 5% SO.sub.4.sup.2? solution was prepared by using 0.0125 g MgSO.sub.4 and 0.2375 g Mg(OH).sub.2, and the 10% SO.sub.4.sup.2? solution was prepared by using 0.025 g MgSO.sub.4 and 0.225 g Mg(OH).sub.2 followed by a similar procedure as for the 1% SO.sub.4.sup.2? sample described above.

    Preparation 3 (PVA/Mg(OH).sub.2/Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 Solutions (1% Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2, 5% Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2, 10% Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2))

    [0127] 1% PO.sub.4.sup.3? solution was prepared by measuring the similar weights mentioned in preparation, but Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 was used instead of MgCl.sub.2. The measured weights were dissolved in 7 mL of 5 moldm.sup.?3 acetic acid via sonication in a water bath at 30? C. for 1 hour. Then the aqueous solution was added to 5% PVA with a ratio of 3:28 (0.750 mL to 7 mL), with further sonication in a water bath at 30? C. for 20 minutes to eliminate precipitation. The 5% PO.sub.4.sup.3? solution was prepared by using 0.0125 g Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 and 0.2375 g Mg(OH).sub.2. The 10% PO.sub.4.sup.3? solution was prepared by using 0.025 g Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 and 0.225 g Mg(OH).sub.2 followed by a similar procedure as for the 1% PO.sub.4.sup.3? sample described above.

    Synthesis of Cl.sup.?, SO.sub.4.sup.2? and PO.sub.4.sup.3? Doped MgO Sorbent Samples

    [0128] Electrospinning was carried out by using a needle-collector setup in top-down configuration with aluminum foil spread across the collector plate. All the samples were electrospun with an applied voltage of 20.5 kV and 21 G?? needle with the sharp end ground flat. The needle-collector distance was 12 cm, with a flowrate of 0.3 mL/hour. After electrospinning, the wet nanofiber layer deposited on the aluminum foil was oven-dried at 60? C. for 48 hours. This gave the solidified layer having a brittle consistency, which was then collected as flakes for calcination in a box furnace (Anhui Haibei 1100 model). During calcination, the furnace temperature was increased from 30 to 300? C. with a heating rate of 2? C./minute. The samples were heated at 300? C. for 2 hours, followed by air cooling to room temperature. The prepared doped MgO sorbent samples were then subjected to mechanical grinding using a mortar and pestle to obtain a fine powder.

    Aging

    [0129] The aging treatment was carried out by exposing the fine powder samples of Cl.sup.?, SO.sub.4.sup.2? and PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO sorbent samples as prepared above to ambient air conditions for 3 months to 6 months.

    Example 2: Sorbent Design Rationale

    [0130] Current research in CO.sub.2 sorbents adopt a trial-and-error approach, which is an approach that is not only time consuming but may also risk overlooking optimal doping chemicals. Bioinspired water harvesting materials have been known to take inspiration from a mechanism used by Namib Desert Beetles whose surface structures and chemistries enable them to collect water from fog by firstly facilitating nucleation and growth of water vapor molecules into droplets on wax-free hydrophilic bumps and then transporting the droplets towards the mouth of the beetle by the waxy hydrophobic surroundings. An important point to note is to separate the water harvesting action into two processes: (1) water droplet formation at hydrophilic sites, and (2) water droplet transportation along hydrophobic channels. This concept may be adapted in the present technology, to fill the gap between the current trial-and-error approach and bioinspired rational design strategies, in the development of MgO-based CO.sub.2 adsorbents.

    [0131] To design a highly efficient CO.sub.2 adsorbent, it was necessary to develop a tool that may couple the surface CO.sub.2-philic and CO.sub.2-phobic properties to balance the nucleation and transportation process during CO.sub.2 absorption so that the surface of the adsorbent will not be completely blocked by the formed MgCO.sub.3, and therefore more CO.sub.2 molecules may be further adsorbed. Therefore, a chemical doping method was explored based on the so-called iso-diagonality in the Periodic Table of Elements. The iso-diagonal trend refers to a pair of elements (such as carbon/phosphorus and nitrogen/sulphur pairs) that have an adjacent upper left/lower right relative location in the Periodic Table of Elements, which are believed to have similar size and electronegativity, resulting in similar trends in properties. It is less explored than the vertical and horizontal trends. For instance, it is well accepted that nitrites (NO.sub.2.sup.?) promote CO.sub.2 adsorption in MgO based sorbents, since carbon and nitrogen are located close by in the same period of the Periodic Table of Elements. Accordingly, new dopants that may have similar properties as either carbon/oxygen (the two constituent elements of CO.sub.2) or nitrogen were explored, using the iso-diagonal relationship of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. Their respective iso-diagonal partner, phosphorous (P), sulphur (S), and chlorine (Cl), were therefore tested as new dopants to nano MgOMg(OH).sub.2 composites in order to balance the surface CO.sub.2-philic and CO.sub.2-phobic properties for efficient CO.sub.2 absorption.

    Example 3: CO.SUB.2 .Adsorption of Doped MgO Sorbent (As Prepared)

    [0132] Each precursor solution was prepared by incorporating MgCl.sub.2, MgSO.sub.4 or Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2 with Mg(OH).sub.2 and adding different amounts of acetic acid and water as solvents. First, the sorbents were tested for its CO.sub.2 adsorption capacities using thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA). All sorbents developed had over 2 w % of CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity.

    [0133] The Cl.sup.? doped samples calcinated at 300? C. recorded the highest capture capacity compared to the SO.sub.4.sup.2? and PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped samples calcinated at 300? C. Maximum adsorption capacity at 1.5 hours was shown by the 10% Cl.sup.? doped sample indicating an adsorption of 5.59 wt %, while 5% Cl.sup.? and 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples indicated an adsorption of 2.79 wt % and 2.97 wt %, respectively, at 1.5 hours, as shown in FIG. 1a. This indicated that an enhanced surface area of the materials may promote CO.sub.2 capture.

    [0134] However, the SO.sub.4.sup.2? and PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples recorded low adsorption capacities as shown in FIG. 1b and FIG. 1c, respectively. MgO doped with SO.sub.4.sup.2? recorded its maximum adsorption for the 10% SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped sorbent sample and adsorption capacity decreased with decreasing amounts of dopants, as shown in FIG. 1b. The PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples also followed a similar trend as shown in FIG. 1c. Adsorption capacities of sorbent samples doped with SO.sub.4.sup.2? and PO.sub.4.sup.3? were shown to be lower in comparison with the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples. However, it was evident that with increasing dopant percentage, CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity also increased. Even though the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples recorded the highest adsorption capacity using TGA, the 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample underperformed during gas sensing testing. This is further discussed in Example 9.

    Example 4: CO.SUB.2 .Adsorption of Doped MgO (Aged)

    [0135] To determine the CO.sub.2 adsorption capacities of the aged Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples, TGA analysis was carried out for 2 hours on the sorbent samples. The electrospun Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples were aged over 6 months and the CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity was evaluated via a thermogravimetric method at 30? C. (FIG. 2). The CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity was evaluated on the same sorbent sample: 1) as prepared, 2) 3-month aged and 3) 6-month aged, to evaluate the effects of long-term sorbent performance.

    [0136] The MgO sorbent samples doped with Cl.sup.? reported higher CO.sub.2 adsorption capacities before and after aging. The 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample exhibited increased absorption with increase in aging time for up to 6-months. The 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample recorded a higher adsorption capacity of 16.15% at 6 months of aging, which was a large increase from its initial value of 2.79 wt % measured before aging treatment, as shown in FIG. 2a and Table 1, even though the 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample did not have a significantly higher Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area (discussed in Example 8). Nevertheless, the 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample achieved the best adsorption capacity after 6 months of aging, which indicated that CO.sub.2 adsorption was not solely governed by surface area. Furthermore, interestingly, after 3 months of aging, the 5% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample was shown to have a high CO.sub.2 adsorption of 13.95 wt % within 2 hours, yet after 6 months of aging, the same 5% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample showed a decrease in adsorption capacity, having an adsorption of 5.48 wt % within 2 hours. MgO doped with 10% Cl.sup.? showed a slight decrease in CO.sub.2 adsorption, from its adsorption capacity as prepared of 5.59 wt % to 4.11 wt % and 4.00 wt % after 3 months and 6 months of aging, respectively, indicating a decrease in adsorption with aging of the sorbent sample.

    [0137] The behavior of the 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample may be explained by the formation of C8 compounds such as nano-C.sub.8H.sub.10MgO.sub.10.Math.4H.sub.2O. The 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample, having less Cl.sup.?, may not have hindered the formation of the C8 compound, unlike the 5% and 10% Cl.sup.? doped samples.

    [0138] MgO doped with SO.sub.4.sup.2? showed a slight increase in CO.sub.2 adsorption for the 1%, 5% and 10% doped sorbent samples, which showed 2.99 wt %, 3.19 wt % and 4.46 wt % CO.sub.2 adsorption, respectively, at their 3-month aging time point. However, it was noted that this trend was not observed for the PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples, as the adsorption capacity of the 1% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples decreased slightly after 3-months of aging from 2.48 wt % to 2.15 wt % and the CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity of 5% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped samples did not change with aging, remaining at 2.64 wt %.

    [0139] In contrast, for the 10% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent sample, an increase in absorption capacity from 2.98 wt % to 3.58 wt % was observed after 3 months of aging. However, unlike sorbent samples doped with Cl.sup.? or SO.sub.4.sup.2?, PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples showed an increase in adsorption capacities after 6 months of aging, of 4.80 wt %, 3.28 wt % and 3.33 wt % for 10%, 5% and 1% PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples, respectively. A summary of the CO.sub.2 capture capacities of the sorbent samples is summarized in Table 1.

    TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Summary of CO.sub.2 adsorption at 30? C. for 120 minutes for Cl.sup.? , PO.sub.4.sup.3.sup.?and SO.sub.4.sup.2.sup.? doped MgO samples Adsorption Adsorption Adsorption (wt %) (wt %) 30? C. (wt %) 30? C. 30? C. MgO Samples Dopant % As Prepared Aged - 3 Months Aged - 6 Months Cl.sup.? doped 1 2.79 3.34 16.15 5 2.97 13.95 5.48 10 5.59 4.11 4.00 SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped 1 2.19 2.99 3.89 5 2.55 3.19 3.72 10 2.97 4.46 3.62 PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped 1 2.48 2.15 3.33 5 2.64 2.64 3.28 10 2.98 3.58 4.80

    [0140] It is evident that the sorbent samples comprise excessive amounts of hydrates and carbonates, as shown by the XRD data as further discussed in Example 5. Extensive carbonation of sorbents may be a result of using them at room temperature conditions. The sorbents adsorb CO.sub.2 from the atmosphere in typical indoor spaces where the temperature is approximately 25? C. and CO.sub.2 levels are approximately 2200 ppm. The existence of H.sub.2O enhances the carbonation process of the sorbents and this promotes conversion of MgO in the sorbent samples to its hydrates. If the calcination temperature is increased to 500? C., all the residual Mg(OH).sub.2 in the sorbent sample is converted to MgO, indicating the decomposition of Mg(OH).sub.2. This may result in the high adsorption capacities of the doped sorbent samples after 6 months of aging. The residual MgCO.sub.3 in the doped MgO sorbent samples may form pores on the surface due to aging, promoting diffusion of CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O to react with residual MgO present in the sorbent samples. This may increase CO.sub.2 adsorption capacities when aging the sorbent sample.

    Example 5: Structural Analysis

    [0141] In order to investigate the chemical composition of the synthesized sorbent materials, the Cl.sup.?, PO.sub.4.sup.3? and SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO samples which were calcinated at 300? C. were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) as shown in FIG. 3. The XRD pattern of pure MgO (ICDD 00-045-0946) and pure Mg(OH).sub.2 (ICDD 00-044-1482) was also provided for comparison. The main peaks of the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples matched with characteristic peaks of MgO (111), MgO (200), MgO (220), MgO (331), MgO (222), MgO (400), MgO (420), MgO (422) and Mg(OH).sub.2(101) from 35? to 140? as shown in FIG. 3a. The 10? to 35? peaks mainly belonged to multiple hydrates shown in FIG. 3b. It is evident that from 2?=10?-35? in FIG. 3b, the peaks belong to multiple hydrates of chlorine, as magnesium chlorate hydrate (Mg(ClO.sub.4).sub.2.Math.xH.sub.2O) (ICDD 00-031-0789), magnesium chloride carbonate hydrate (Mg.sub.2Cl.sub.2CO.sub.3.Math.7H.sub.2O) (ICDD 00-021-1254) and magnesium chloride diethylene glycol (C.sub.8H.sub.20Cl.sub.2MgO.sub.6) (ICDD 00-031-1763).

    [0142] Based on the sharp diffraction peaks in FIG. 3a, 1% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples appear to show better crystallinity. However, the sharpness of the peaks decreased with increasing dopant percentage, as crystallinity also declined. As the Cl.sup.? percentage was increased in the sorbent samples, the characteristic peaks of the MgO shifted towards the lower angles as shown in FIG. 3a. The intensities of the hydrate peaks from 10? to 35? were visibly reduced with increasing Cl.sup.? percentage as shown in FIG. 3b, indicating poor crystallinity of the samples and suggesting a systematic decrease in the grain size. This may also be due to size difference of the doped atoms in the sorbent samples, causing the crystal structure to expand or contract. However, the low intensity and large width of the peaks of the doped MgO samples indicated poor crystallinity, which may suggest a MgOMg(OH).sub.2 structure that has many defects and is amorphous-like.

    [0143] Further chemical equilibria calculations were carried out with FactSage for the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples at 10%, 5% and 1% wt MgCl.sub.2 levels at a temperature of 300? C.

    [0144] FactSage is a commercial chemical equilibrium calculation system that predicts/calculates the chemical equilibria at a given process condition such as temperature, pressure and the chemistry of initial reagents. The calculations may help to determine the chemical reactions of Cl.sup.? doped systems, and thus the role of the Cl dopants in the sorbent.

    [00001] ( 1 ) 10 % wt MgCl 2 1.543 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) 2 + 0 . 1 05 ( mol ) MgCl 2 + 1 ( mol ) H 2 O + 1 ( mol ) CO 2 = 1.44 ( mol ) MgO + 0.21 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) Cl + gas phase equation ( 2 ) ( 2 ) 5 % wt MgCl 2 MgC1 2 1.629 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) 2 + 0.053 ( mol ) MgCl 2 + 0 . 1 04 ( mol ) H 2 O + 0 . 1 04 ( mol ) CO 2 = 1.579 ( mol ) MgO + 0.102 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) Cl + 0.0001 MgCO 3 + gas phase equation ( 3 ) ( 3 ) 1 % wt MgC1 2 1.698 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) 2 + 0.011 MgCl 2 + 0 .112 H 2 O + 0 . 1 12 ( mol ) CO 2 = 1.688 ( mol ) MgO + 0.018 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) Cl + 0.0008 MgCO 3 + gas phase equation ( 4 )

    [0145] The CO.sub.2 threshold (at an equal CO.sub.2 to H.sub.2O ratio) for the formation of MgCO.sub.3 for the 10%, 5% and 1% wt MgCl.sub.2 doped samples was respectively >1.0, 0.104, and 0.112 (moles) for a 100 gram sample. Based on equation (1), no MgCO.sub.3 was formed even when 1 mole CO.sub.2 was added to the 10% wt MgCl.sub.2 doped sample, but MgCO.sub.3 was formed for 5% wt and 1% wt MgCl.sub.2 doped samples.

    [0146] Therefore, it is unlikely that MgCO.sub.3 is stable in samples having 10% wt MgCl.sub.2 and 90% Mg(OH).sub.2 whereas the MgCO.sub.3 is stable in the 5% wt and 1% wt MgCl.sub.2 samples, because of the much lower (<<0.5 atm) CO.sub.2 level in air.

    [0147] It is interesting that based on thermodynamic calculation, the 5% wt Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample had the lowest CO.sub.2 threshold and therefore the largest CO.sub.2 concentration gap with refer to the CO.sub.2 level in air, which correlated well with the heights of the glass phase XRD peaks from 10? to 40? (2?).

    [0148] To further investigate whether hydrates form in the 5% wt Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample at 25? C., the following calculation was performed:

    [00002] ( 4 ) 5 % wt MgCl 2 1.629 ( mol ) Mg ( O H ) 2 + 0.053 ( mol ) MgCl 2 + 0.104 ( mol ) H 2 O + 0 . 0 0 0001 ( mol ) CO 2 = 1.603 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) 2 + 0 . 0 53 ( mol ) Mg ( OH ) Cl + 0.0001 MgCO 3 + 0.026 MgCl 2 ( H 2 O ) 4 + gas phase ( 4 )

    [0149] A new hydrate phase, MgCl.sub.2(H.sub.2O).sub.4, was formed at 25? C., which supported the assumption that the hydrate glass phases may be represented by the XRD peaks from 10? to 40? (2?)). Therefore, based on thermodynamics, it was evident that hydration was a competitive process to CO.sub.2 adsorption.

    [0150] In FIG. 3c, the SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped sorbent samples showed a similar pattern to that of the Cl.sup.? doped MgOMg(OH).sub.2 samples, and as the percentage of SO.sub.4.sup.2? increased, the CO.sub.2 adsorption also increased. Although the peaks related to MgO had a low intensity, peak shift was observed in MgO (111), MgO (200), MgO (220), MgO (331), MgO (222), MgO (400), MgO (331), MgO (420), MgO (422) and Mg(OH).sub.2 (101) similar to the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples. Peak intensities of the samples were low due to glass formation in the samples during calcination at 300? C. From 2?=10?-35? the peaks indicate the presence of multiple hydrates as magnesium carbonate hydroxide hydrate (Mg.sub.2CO.sub.3(OH).sub.2.Math.3H.sub.2O) (ICDD 00-006-0484), magnesium oxide sulphate hydrate (Mg.sub.6O.sub.5SO.sub.4.Math.8H.sub.2O) (ICDD 00-008-0280), and magnesium malonate hydrate (C.sub.3H.sub.2MgO.sub.4.Math.2H.sub.2O) (ICDD 00-026-1851) as shown in FIG. 3d. Peak shift was observed with increasing percentage of the SO.sub.4.sup.2? dopant in the sorbent sample, which was due to formation of hydrates.

    [0151] The PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples showed poor sample correlation with MgO in comparison with Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples and SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped sorbent samples, as shown in FIG. 3e. However, they also showed multiple phases such as magnesium phosphate (Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2) (ICDD 01-075-1491), magnesium phosphate hydrate (Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.Math. 22H.sub.2O) (ICDD 00-044-0775), magnesium carbonate hydroxide hydrate (Mg.sub.5(CO.sub.3).sub.4(OH).sub.2(H.sub.2O).sub.4) (ICDD 01-070-0361) and magnesium oxalate (MgC.sub.2O.sub.4) (ICDD 00-026-1222), showing correlation with the samples as shown in FIG. 3f. The XRD spectrum of PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped sorbent samples, which were doped with 1% wt, 5% wt, and 10% wt Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2, indicated the dissolution of both MgO and Mg(OH).sub.2 phases and the formation of magnesium oxalate (MgC.sub.2O.sub.4) and magnesium phosphate hydrate (Mg.sub.3(PO.sub.4).sub.2.Math.22H.sub.2O). It was evident from the XRD analysis that the tendency of hydrate formation increased in order of Cl.sup.?, SO.sub.4.sup.2? to PO.sub.4.sup.3? doping, as shown in FIG. 3b, FIG. 3d and FIG. 3f.

    Example 6: Surface Analysis

    [0152] The surface morphologies of the sorbent samples were investigated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JEOL JSM-7600F), using a voltage of 5 kV and a working distance of 8 mm as shown in FIG. 4, FIG. 5 and FIG. 6. The samples were ground after calcination and gold sputtered before analysis. The 1%, 5% and 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples were calcinated at 300? C. for 2 hours as shown in FIG. 4. The 1% Cl.sup.? sorbent sample displayed a few fractured rod-like structures. The formation of rods indicated a 1-dimensional heterogeneous growth of MgO.

    [0153] The 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample displayed sheet-like structures with uniform surfaces, having a typical 2-dimensional diffusion mode. The 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample showed a similar structure to the 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample, having a sheet-like uniform structure. The changes in morphology observed as the dopant concentration was increased from 1, 5 and 10% wt Cl.sup.?, were similar to that observed for MgO grown from Mg(OH).sub.2 using different alkali salts.

    [0154] SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO samples displayed sheet-like structures after calcination for 2 hours at 300? C. As SO.sub.4.sup.2? concentration was increased, the observed grain size decreased, which was consistent with previous observations that the loss of water during the decomposition of Mg(OH).sub.2 resulted in the formation of a porous structure, which fills up with growth of newly formed MgO particles.

    [0155] PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO samples also showed sheet-like structures under similar conditions, indicating a strong presence of heterogeneously grown hydrates. The morphology of the PO.sub.4.sup.3? doped MgO samples were observed to be different than that of the Cl and SO.sub.4.sup.2? doped MgO samples, due to the disappearance of the MgO phase, which may be the reason for their much lower CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity among the 3 dopants tested. All the samples showed a sheet size of 1-3 ?m.

    Example 7: Influence of Calcination Temperature

    [0156] The 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample was further evaluated for the influence of calcination temperature on CO.sub.2 adsorption at room temperature. The 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample was calcinated at 500? C. in a box furnace (Anhui Haibei Import & Export Co., Ltd., 1100 model, Hefei, Anhui, China). During the calcination, the furnace temperature was increased from 30? C. to 500? C. with a heating rate of 2? C./minute, and was then kept at 500? C. for 2 hours, followed by air cooling to room temperature. TGA analysis was subsequently performed to record the CO.sub.2 adsorbing capacity using the same procedure indicated in Example 1. The same procedure for calcination and TGA analysis was repeated for a sample calcinated at 700? C. The sample calcinated at 500? C. and 700? C. showed a CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity of 1.4 wt % and 1.33 wt %, respectively, within 1.5 hours, which was a low adsorption value compared to the 5.59 wt % of the same sample calcinated at 300? C. shown in FIG. 5a.

    [0157] This significant decrease in CO.sub.2 adsorption capacity with an increase in calcination temperature may be related to the dissolution of the designed CO.sub.2-philic MgO and CO.sub.2-phobic Mg(OH).sub.2 interfaces, along with the disappearance of the Mg(OH).sub.2 phase at a high calcination temperature of 500? C. and above, as shown in their respective XRD spectra in FIG. 5b.

    [0158] The XRD analysis of the sorbent samples showed the main 2? peaks of MgO (ICDD 00-045-0946) to be 36.74, 42.72, 62.06, 74.33, 78.35, 93.70, 105.33, 109.36, and 126.65, which were consistent with MgO (111), MgO (200), MgO (220), MgO (331), MgO (222), MgO (400), MgO (331), MgO (420), and MgO (422), suggesting that the formation of MgO may have caused a slight shift towards the lower angles indicated in FIG. 4b. This may be due to the possible lattice stresses caused when balancing out the stresses at the grain boundaries. In addition, by incorporating another atom in the form of a dopant such as Cl.sup.?, may have led to atomic radius substitutions into the atom vacancies in the lattice, which may again cause the shift in all the peaks towards the lower angles.

    [0159] The sample calcinated at 500? C. showed high intensity peaks compared to the sample calcinated at 300? C., suggesting better crystallinity in the sorbent sample calcined at 500? C. Morphology of the 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples calcinated at 500? C. (FIG. 5c) and 700? C. (FIG. 5d) showed similarities in structure, showing hierarchical structures with an average particle size of 1 ?m. After calcination at 500? C. and 700? C., peaks related to hydrates and Mg(OH).sub.2 disappeared and the sample was now fully converted to MgO.

    Example 8: Surface Area Analysis

    [0160] To clarify the performance of the Cl.sup.? doped MgO/Mg(OH).sub.2 samples, the samples were thoroughly characterized using BET analysis. The specific surface area of the Cl.sup.? doped MgO samples were calculated using the BET method.

    [0161] A summary of surface areas is shown in Table 2, where the 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample showed a higher specific surface area of 65.53 m.sup.2g.sup.?1 compared to the other sorbent samples. Although the 10% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample had a higher CO.sub.2 capture capacity as discussed in Example 4, it was also shown to have the lowest specific surface area of 26.18 m.sup.2g.sup.?1.

    [0162] The adsorption-desorption curves of the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples are shown in FIG. 8. The 5% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample had the maximum hydrate phases (2 theta angles from 10?-35? in FIG. 3b) which was supported by the BET measurement.

    TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 BET surface area of Cl doped MgO samples. BET Surface Area Sample (m.sup.2g.sup.?1) 1% Cl 50.35 ? 0.74 5% Cl 65.53 ? 1.03 10% Cl 26.19 ? 0.38

    Example 9: Gas Sensing Test

    [0163] Gas sensing test was carried for the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample which recorded the highest surface area, the 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample, and the results are shown in FIG. 7 and Table 3. As shown in Table 2, 5% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples had a higher BET surface area compared to other Cl.sup.? doped samples. FIG. 7 and Table 3 confirmed that the 5% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample had a gas sensing ability at 200 to 300? C.

    TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 CO.sub.2 gas sensing data at different sensing temperatures for the 5% Cl.sup.? doped MgO sample CO.sub.2 gas 5000 ppm 1500 ppm 500 ppm 150 ppm 50 ppm 200? C. 1.017 1 1 1 1 250? C. 1.022 1.014 1 1 1 300? C. 1.013 1.009 1.006 1 1

    [0164] The Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples were found to be a poor CO.sub.2 sensing material at room temperature, due to the chemisorption of CO.sub.2.

    [0165] The measurement at 300? C. detected CO.sub.2 at 500 ppm levels because the thermal decomposition temperature (to MgCO.sub.3) is about 327? C.

    Example 10: Adsorption-Desorption Analysis

    [0166] To further analyse the sorbent samples, adsorption/desorption cycles were carried out on 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples, and the results are shown in FIG. 8. It was found that the CO.sub.2 uptake at 30? C. for the 10% Cl.sup.? doped sorbent sample decreased from 5.12 to 4.19 wt % over 10 cycles at 30? C., which proved that the sorbent had a good long-term adsorption/desorption stability. It was previously reported that (Li, Na, K)NO.sub.3MgO sorbents showed a decrease in adsorbing capacity from 16.8 to 3.2 mmol.Math.g.sup.?1 over 20 cycles. It was also previously reported that CO.sub.2 uptake of (Li, K)NO.sub.3(Na, K).sub.2CO.sub.3MgO sorbents dramatically dropped by 45% after 30 cycles. In comparison, the 10% Cl.sup.? doped sample disclosed herein, showed a drop rate in CO.sub.2 adsorption of only about 18% over 10 adsorption/desorption cycles at 30? C., indicating a better cycle stability at room temperature.

    [0167] The adsorption/desorption curves showed that even though a large number of hydrates were present in the 10% Cl.sup.? doped sample, it was stable at 30? C. Therefore, the presence of the hydrates may enhance the performance of the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent materials.

    Example 11: Iso-Diagonality

    [0168] It is well known that iso-diagonality is an important feature when considering properties of chemical substances. Phosphorus, sulfur and chlorine are iso-diagonal partners in period 3 of the Periodic Table of Elements, where both phosphorus and sulfur are multivalent nonmetals and chlorine is a monovalent nonmetal. All three of these elements form van der Waals bonds. In recent times, the diagonal properties have come into light as most cases of iso-diagonality involve covalently bonded species. The electronegativity of these elements is in the order of phosphorus<sulfur<chlorine. The electronegativities of carbon and phosphorus are very similar, i.e 2.05 and 2.06, respectively. The non-polar nature of the carbon-phosphorus bond results in the ability of phosphorus to replace carbon with insignificant changes in chemical reactivity. However, the electronegativity of sulfur (2.44) and chlorine (2.83) are closer to carbon than nitrogen (3.07) and oxygen (3.05). This may be the reason why the Cl.sup.? doped sorbent samples outperformed the PO.sub.4.sup.?3 and SO.sub.4.sup.?2 doped sorbent samples, while the SO.sub.4.sup.?2 and PO.sub.4.sup.?3 doped sorbent samples performed similarly to each other in terms of CO.sub.2 adsorption.

    Comparative Example

    [0169] The following Table 4 summarizes the previously known works on using MgO for CO.sub.2 capture, in comparison with the sorbent of the present disclosure.

    TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Room temperature CO.sub.2 capture capacities of MgO based adsorbents compared with 10% Cl.sup.? doped sample disclosed herein. CO.sub.2 Sorption Capture Synthesis Temperature Capacity Example Material Method (? C.) (wt %) Present Sorbent MgO/5% Cl.sup.? Electrospinning 30 13.95 Comparative 1 MgO/TiO.sub.2 Sol-gel process 25 0.47 Comparative 2 MgO solution- 25 1.611 combustion process and Ball milling Comparative 3 MgO Template method 25 8 Comparative 4 MgO Electrospinning 30 3.9 Comparative 5 MgO Sol-gel synthesis 30 4.9 Tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) Comparative 6 MgO Aerogel method 30 10.3 Comparative 7 MgO/CeO.sub.2 Sol-gel 30 10.4 combustion method Comparative 8 MgO/CuO Sol-gel and wet 40 5.0 chemical technique

    INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

    [0170] The material as defined above may be used in CO.sub.2 adsorbing devices, gas separation equipment, post- and pre-combustion CO.sub.2 capture, CO.sub.2 recovery and storage, catalysis, interconversion of hydrocarbons, natural gas purification, biogas upgrading, building materials including cement materials, fuel synthesis and in CO.sub.2 sensors.

    [0171] The material as defined above may also be suitable for use in coastal protection engineering, to adapt to rising sea levels and acidification of sea water due to CO.sub.2 adsorption. Similarly, the material as defined above may be suitable for use in adsorbing CO.sub.2 from wastewater.

    [0172] The material as defined above may be used to desorb CO.sub.2, which may be suitable for use in regulating CO.sub.2 concentrations both indoor and outdoors, as well as facilitating organism growth, for example in a marine environment.

    [0173] The carbon captured by the material as defined above may also be used in the manufacture of carbon products such as carbon nanotubes and carbon powders, thereby making the material as defined above valuable for sourcing carbon.

    [0174] It will be apparent that various other modifications and adaptations of the invention will be apparent to the person skilled in the art after reading the foregoing disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention and it is intended that all such modifications and adaptations come within the scope of the appended claims.