DETECTION OF ELECTRIC ARCS IN AN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Abstract

A method for detecting an electrical arc in an electrical system including analyzing a reflectogram representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in said electrical system and, when an electric arc is identified in the reflectogram, incrementing a detection counter by one unit.

Claims

1. A method for detecting an electric arc in an electrical system, said method comprising the following steps, performed by a processing unit: a) analyzing (201) a reflectogram representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in said electrical system and, if an electric arc is identified in the reflectogram, incrementing (202) a detection counter by one unit; b) comparing (203) the value of the detection counter with a first determined value, preferably equal to the unit, if the value of the detection counter is equal to the first determined value, c) storing (204), in a memory, a value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc (d), otherwise, d) comparing (205) a value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified arc with a determined value interval, said value interval preferably being equal to a value representative of the position stored in memory of an identified electric arc plus or minus a second determined value (x), if the value representative of the position of the identified electric arc in the electrical system is not included in the determined value interval, e) storing a third determined detection counter value in the memory, otherwise, f) comparing (207) the value of the detection counter with a fourth determined value (N) and, if the value of the detection counter is equal to the fourth determined value, generating (208) a diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc.

2. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein, step e) consists, in storing (206), in the memory, a detection counter value equal to the unit and a value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc (d).

3. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein, step e) consists, in storing (301), in the memory, the value of the detection counter from which a fifth determined value (a) greater than or equal to one is subtracted.

4. The detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein, subsequent to step d), and if the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc is comprised in the determined value interval, the method further comprises the following steps: g) comparing (401) a value representative of the time elapsed since the first identification of an electric arc with a determined threshold value (t.sub.th) and, if the value representative of the time elapsed since the first identification of an electric arc is greater than or equal to the determined threshold value, h) storing (402), in the memory, the value of the detection counter from which a sixth determined value (b) is subtracted, otherwise, the method executes step f).

5. The detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein an electric arc is identified in a reflectogram as soon as an amplitude value of a measured reflectogram, from which a determined reference reflectogram is subtracted, is greater than or equal to a determined threshold value.

6. The detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the reflectogram is acquired by a reflectometry method of the MCTDR type (Multi Carrier Time Domain Reflectometry) meaning multi-carrier reflectometry in the time domain.

7. The detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein, the value of the detection counter is equal to zero prior to the implementation of the steps of the method, the first determined value is equal to 1, the second determined value is between 0.3 and 0.7 meters and the fourth determined value N is between 2 and 10.

8. The detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein, a diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc is a signal adapted to be transmitted to a user via a human/machine interface and/or a data stored in a memory, adapted to be interrogated by a user.

9. The detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein, diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc is a signal adapted to be transmitted to a disconnect system adapted to disconnect the line so as to remove the electric arc.

10. A unit for processing (505) an electric arc in an electrical system, said processing unit (505) being adapted to implement the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 9 and comprising: means for analyzing a reflectogram representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in said electrical system and means for incrementing a detection counter by one unit; means for comparing the value of the detection counter with a first determined value, preferably equal to the unit; means for storing, in a memory, a value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc (d); means for comparing a value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc with a determined value interval, said value interval preferably being equal to a value representative of the position stored in the memory of an identified electric arc plus or minus a second determined value (x); means for storing, in the memory, a third determined detection counter value; and means for comparing the value of the detection counter with a fourth determined value (N) and means for generating diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc.

11. An electric arc detection system (501) comprising means (502) adapted to acquire reflectograms representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in an electrical system (503), a memory (504) and a processing unit (505) according to claim 10.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0056] The present invention will be better understood and further details, features and advantages of the present invention will become clearer upon reading the following non-limiting example description, with reference to the appended drawings in which:

[0057] FIG. 1a is an example of a reflectogram representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in an electrical system;

[0058] FIG. 1b is another example of a reflectogram representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in an electrical system;

[0059] FIG. 2 is a flowchart of an embodiment of the method according to the invention;

[0060] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of another embodiment of the method according to the invention;

[0061] FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an embodiment of the method according to the invention; and,

[0062] FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of an embodiment of an electric arc detection system according to the invention.

[0063] The elements having the same functions in the various embodiments have the same references in the figures.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0064] With reference to FIG. 2, we will now describe an embodiment of the method of detecting an electric arc in an electrical system according to the invention. The electrical system may be, for example, an electrical system of an aircraft. The steps of the method are performed by a processing unit. This processing unit may, for example, belong to a system for detecting electric arcs by reflectometry which comprises, in addition to the unit, means adapted to acquire reflectograms representative of the spatial distribution of impedance in an electrical system, a memory for storing data.

[0065] The described method is based on the continuous measurement (for each iteration of the method) of the impedance variations of an electrical line. In particular, these measurements are performed by a reflectometry method which allows to obtain reflectograms representative of the spatial distribution of impedance in the measured electrical system. In a non-limiting implementation mode, each reflectogram is obtained by a reflectometry method of the MCTDR type (Multi Carrier Time Domain Reflectometry).

[0066] The difference reflectogram is the calculation of the amplitudes of the reflectogram received in real time from which are subtracted those of a reference reflectogram taken at the initialization of the diagnosis. This method thus allows to diagnose in real time the impedance evolutions related in particular to the appearance of an electric arc.

[0067] Classically, and as already described above, the diagnosis becomes positive (i.e., the presence of an electric arc is confirmed) each time the amplitude of a difference reflectogram exceeds one or several predetermined threshold values. In other words, an arc detection takes place at the location where the exceedance was observed. The principle of the method is to use several successive measurements to increase the probability that such an overshoot is indeed linked to the presence of an electric arc in the system and not to an artifact generated, for example, by noise. Indeed, in the case of noise, for example related to an environmental fault, the probability that the arc location output data is identical between several consecutive positive diagnoses is very low. In addition, the higher the number of acquisitions, the lower the probability. This ensures that an arc detection is reliable when several acquisitions confirm the same information.

[0068] The step 201 consists in the analysis of a reflectogram representative of the spatial distribution of impedance in the measured electrical system. This analysis is done by comparing the last received reflectogram to the reference reflectogram (i.e., the reference reflectogram is subtracted from each measured reflectogram). If an electric arc is identified in the reflectogram, the step 202 consists of incrementing a detection counter by one. For example, a detection counter C stored in a memory is initialized to 0 prior to the implementation of the steps of the method and has its value incremented by 1 when an arc is identified in the difference reflectogram. Furthermore, in a non-limiting implementation, an electric arc is identified in a reflectogram whenever an amplitude value of the difference reflectogram is greater than or equal to a determined threshold value.

[0069] In the step 203, the processing unit compares the value of the detection counter with a determined value, for example equal to the unit. Then, if the value of the detection counter is equal to this determined value, a value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc is stored in a memory in step 204. In other words, the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified arc during the current iteration of the d.sub.meas method becomes the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified arc stored in memory d.

[0070] Otherwise, if the value of the detection counter is different from this determined value, the step 205 of the method is executed.

[0071] The step 205 comprises comparing the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified arc with a determined value interval. For example, this range of value may be equal to a value representative of the position of the identified arc that is stored in memory plus or minus another determined value x. Put another way, d.sub.meas is compared to d±x. For example, in one particular implementation, x is between 0.3 and 0.7 meters. The person skilled in the art will know how to adjust the determined value x to minimize the computation time without risking failure to detect the arc in a subsequent iteration of the method.

[0072] Thus, if the value representative of the position of the identified electric arc in the electrical system is not within the determined value range, the value assigned to the detection counter stored in memory becomes one in step 206 and the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc in the current iteration of the method d.sub.meas becomes the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc stored in memory d.

[0073] Alternatively, in step 207, the processing unit compares the value of the detection counter with a third determined value N and, if the value of the detection counter is equal to this third determined value, the processing unit may generate, in step 208, diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc.

[0074] In a particular embodiment, the third determined value N is between 2 and 10. In fact, classically, for a typical system of electric arc detection by reflectometry, the acquisition/generation time of a reflectogram is about 1 millisecond. Thus, the method can confirm the occurrence of an electric arc after N×1 milliseconds. However, studies have shown that, particularly for an electrical system of an aircraft, the detection of an electric arc within a few milliseconds is appropriate to have a reliable measurement while detecting an arc sufficiently quickly, in particular in order to limit its harmful effects.

[0075] In particular embodiments, diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc in the electrical system may be a signal adapted to be transmitted to a user via a human/machine interface, such as an audible or visual signal and/or data stored in a memory, adapted to be interrogated by a user. Thus, a user can be informed of the actual detection of an electric arc in the measured electrical system. In addition, the information in question may also include the position in the system of the detected arc if any.

[0076] In other particular embodiments, diagnostic information representative of the presence of an electric arc in the electrical system may be a signal adapted to be transmitted to a disconnect system that will then make a decision to open the line in order to stop the electric arc.

[0077] In summary, advantageously, the use of several successive acquisitions to confirm the detection of an electric arc in an electrical system allows to obtain a reliable and robust detection even when the measurements are disturbed by an electromagnetic noise.

[0078] With reference to FIG. 3, in an alternative method, in the step 301, the value of the detection counter stored in memory is its value at the time of the measurement from which a fourth determined value a is subtracted. In particular, a is a value greater than or equal to one. Thus, the counter does not necessarily fall back to one. Advantageously, in this implementation mode, the method does not necessarily require only consecutive positive diagnoses to confirm the detection of an electric arc. Thus, this mode of implementation allows more arc detections actually related to noise to be ruled out. By adjusting the determined value a, it is possible to decrement the detection counter by an optimal value allowing, on the one hand, not to lose several successive positive method iterations due to a noisy iteration and, on the other hand, to keep a method allowing a fast detection. Furthermore, the person skilled in the art will appreciate that, if the value of the detection counter is less than zero after the subtraction of a, the counter is reassigned a zero value.

[0079] Finally, with reference to FIG. 4, in another embodiment of the method, subsequent to step 205, and if the value representative of the position in the electrical system of the identified electric arc is within the determined value range, the method further comprises the following steps:

[0080] The step 401 is comparing a value representative of the time elapsed since the first identification of an electric arc with a determined threshold value t.sub.th. Thus, if the value representative of the time elapsed since the first identification of an electric arc is greater than or equal to the threshold value t.sub.th, the processing unit stores in the memory, in the step 402, the value of the detection counter from which is subtracted a fifth determined value b. Otherwise, the step 207, already described with reference to FIG. 2, is executed.

[0081] The threshold value t.sub.th thus corresponds, in other words, to a maximum time allowed for ruling on the detection of an electric arc. Thus, advantageously, this mode of implementation allows to reduce the detection counter if the time between several positive diagnoses becomes too great. Indeed, in this case, it can be considered, for example, that the defect decreases in danger as time goes by since it does not reappear. Thus, in a particular implementation, the counter C decreases by b if the time threshold value is exceeded before the counter reaches the value N. Again, the person skilled in the art will know how to adjust the value of b to select an optimal time to maintain a reliable detection method without being too long.

[0082] FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation of an embodiment of an arc detection system 501 comprising means 502 adapted to acquire reflectograms representative of a spatial impedance distribution in an electrical system 503, a memory 504, and a processing unit 505 adapted to perform the steps of the method described above.