Method and Control Arrangement for Controlling a Speed of a Vehicle When Approaching and/or Travelling a Downhill Road Section
20240227759 ยท 2024-07-11
Inventors
- Mikael ALENIUS (Segeltorp, SE)
- Oliver Somos (H?gersten, SE)
- Frank Mohr (V?rmd?, SE)
- David Karlsson (Linghem, SE)
Cpc classification
B60T8/171
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T7/22
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T2201/022
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/172
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T2250/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/58
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60T8/58
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T8/171
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60T7/22
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Disclosed is a method performed by a control arrangement for controlling a speed of a first vehicle comprising a plurality of brake systems configured to provide brake power for braking the vehicle. The method comprises, when a downhill road section is to be travelled, and when a second vehicle is travelling in front of the first vehicle predicting a plurality of minimum distances corresponding to different brake powers to be applied by at least one of the plurality of brake systems when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section, each minimum distance constituting a resulting minimum distance to the second vehicle. The method further comprises applying, by at least one of the plurality of brake systems, a brake power corresponding to the brake power to be applied to obtain the minimum distance of the plurality of minimum distances such that at least a predetermined minimum distance to the second vehicle is maintained when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section.
Claims
1. Method performed by a control arrangement for controlling a speed of a first vehicle, the first vehicle comprising a plurality of brake systems configured to provide brake power for braking the vehicle, the method comprising, when a downhill road section is to be travelled, and when a second vehicle is travelling in front of the first vehicle: predicting a plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n) corresponding to different brake powers (P.sub.brake_1, P.sub.brake_2, . . . , P.sub.brake_n) to be applied by at least one of the plurality of brake systems when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section, each minimum distance constituting a resulting minimum distance to the second vehicle, and applying, by at least one of the plurality of brake systems, a brake power corresponding to the brake power to be applied to obtain the minimum distance of the plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n) such that at least a predetermined minimum distance (D.sub.pred_min) to the second vehicle is maintained when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the applied brake power corresponds to the brake power to be applied to obtain the minimum distance exceeding the predetermined minimum distance (D.sub.pred_min).
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the applied brake power corresponds to the brake power to be applied to obtain the minimum distance being within a predetermined distance interval (I.sub.D), the predetermined distance interval (I.sub.D) being a distance interval of distances exceeding the predetermined minimum distance (D.sub.pred_min).
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the predetermined distance interval (I.sub.D) is selected by an operator of the first vehicle.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein each minimum distance (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2 . . . , D.sub.min_n) corresponds to a brake power to be applied when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section by one or more auxiliary brake systems.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the one or more auxiliary brake systems are capable of applying a brake power at a plurality of brake power levels and wherein the one or more auxiliary brake systems being utilized to apply the brake power are applied at one of a plurality of brake power levels.
7. The method according to claim 5, further comprising, when none of the plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n) equals or exceeds the predetermined minimum distance (D.sub.pred_min), applying, by the one or more auxiliary brake systems, a brake power corresponding to the highest brake power representing a minimum distance of the plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2 . . . , D.sub.min_n)
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the brake power being applied is selected at least partly based on at least one of: a predetermined priority of the plurality of brake systems, the magnitude of a brake power required for braking the first vehicle when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section, a duration of the application of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section to produce the brake power required for braking the first vehicle, the power level of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section to produce the brake power required for braking the first vehicle, and/or an efficiency of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section to produce the brake power required for braking the first vehicle.
9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising repeatedly predicting the plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n) when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section, each prediction resulting in a plurality of updated minimum distances, and based on the repeated predictions, adjusting the applied brake power to correspond to the brake power to be applied to obtain the updated minimum distance of the plurality of updated minimum distances.
10. The method according to claim 1, further comprising when the first vehicle approaches the end of the downhill road section: reducing the applied brake power to reduce the distance to the second vehicle to a reduced distance, the reduced distance at least corresponding to the predetermined minimum distance (D.sub.pred_min).
11. A control arrangement for controlling a speed of a first vehicle (100), the first vehicle comprising a plurality of brake systems configured to provide brake power for braking the vehicle, the control arrangement being configured to, when a downhill road section (310) is to be travelled, and when a second vehicle is travelling in front of the first vehicle: predict a plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n) corresponding to different brake powers (P.sub.brake_1, P.sub.brake_2, . . . , P.sub.brake_n) to be applied by at least one of the plurality of brake systems when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section, each minimum distance constituting a resulting minimum distance to the second vehicle, and apply, by at least one of the plurality of brake systems, a brake power corresponding to the brake power to be applied to obtain the minimum distance of the plurality of minimum distances (D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2 . . . , D.sub.min_n) such that at least the predetermined minimum distance (D.sub.pred_min) to the second vehicle is maintained when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section.
12. A vehicle comprising a control arrangement according to claim 11.
13. A computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according to claim 1.
14. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according to claim 1.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046] Embodiments of the invention will be illustrated in more detail below, along with the enclosed drawings, where similar references are used for similar parts, and where:
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0054] According to conventional solutions, a speed of a vehicle may be automatically controlled to maintain a requested safe distance to a vehicle in front. Typically, such distance is selected by the vehicle operator and comprises a predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min which is a minimum inter-vehicle distance that the vehicle is allowed to keep. Examples of such automatic speed controllers configured to maintain a requested distance are adaptive cruise control ACC. Such speed controllers use information from a distance sensor that monitors the distance to a vehicle in front and adjusts the speed of the vehicle such that the requested distance to the vehicle in front is maintained or such that the distance to the vehicle in front does not fall below the predetermined minimum distance. When traveling downhill, the speed of the vehicle increases if no brakes are applied due to the force of gravity. Maintaining a set-distance to a vehicle in front is thus obtained by applying a brake force reducing the speed of the vehicle. Such brake force may be applied by means of one or more brake systems in the vehicle. One example of brake systems is friction brake system, such as wheel brakes. A disadvantage of using friction brake system, such as wheel brakes, is that the brake pads of the wheel brakes are subjected to wear which is associated with a cost as the brake pads will eventually have to be replaced when they are worn out. Consequently, the use of wheel brakes should be minimised if auxiliary brakes are suitable to use instead as auxiliary brakes are not associated with cost in the same manner as wheel brakes. Further, should the wheel brakes be overheated due to excessive use, their braking effect may become severely reduced which may be disastrous. The heavier the vehicle the more heat is created. In situations of hard braking this heat can cause the brakes to fade or lose their braking power. This can occur if the brakes are used frequently or consistently in downhill grades. In extreme braking situations the brakes can also be damaged.
[0055] Typically, braking in downhill grades are therefore preferably done by means of one or more auxiliary brake system as a supplement to friction brakes. Auxiliary brakes increase the brake power and reduce the likelihood that the friction brakes will overheat. Examples of auxiliary brakes include exhaust brakes, compression brakes, retarder and, in case of the vehicle being an electric vehicle regenerative brakes.
[0056] However, in some situations, the applied auxiliary brake system may not be able to deliver a sufficient brake power for maintaining the requested distance. This may be the case when travelling on downhill gradients especially on steep and/or long downhill gradients for heavy vehicles or in case sudden high brake power is required. In such cases, brake power is provided by means of friction brakes which may increase the risk of potentially dangerous situations as described above.
[0057] Thus, an improved method to control the speed of a vehicle approaching and/or travelling a downhill road section where the vehicle, herein referred to as the first vehicle, is configured to maintain a distance to a second vehicle in front is required to overcome the problems of conventional solutions.
[0058]
[0059] In another example, the propulsion unit 101 may include only electrical machines for driving the drive wheels 107, whereby the vehicle 100 may be a pure electrical vehicle. The one or more electrical machines may be arranged essentially anywhere along the driveline 110, as long as torque is provided to the driving wheels 107 as is understood by a skilled person. It should be understood that the vehicle 100 may be arranged in any known way, for example without the gearbox 103 illustrated in
[0060] The vehicle may comprise a friction brake system 106, such as e.g., wheel brakes arranged at the wheels of the vehicle 107, 108. The vehicle may further comprise as least one auxiliary brake system 102 with a brake power that is dependent on the speed of the propulsion unit 101 and/or an engaged gear of the gearbox 103. Example of such auxiliary brake systems 102 is engine brake system which may relate to a brake system which utilizes the propulsion unit 101 of the vehicle 100 to provide a brake power and thereby slowing down the vehicle 100. Thus, the engine brake system may, for example, include a compression release brake system and an exhaust brake system in case the vehicle comprises a combustion engine. The vehicle may optionally comprise an auxiliary brake system 104 with a brake power independent of the speed of the propulsion unit 101, such as a retarder. Such a retarder 104 may, for example, be connected to an output shaft of the gearbox 103 as illustrated in
[0061] Furthermore, the engine brake system may comprise a regenerative brake system in case the vehicle 100 comprises an electric machine. In a regenerative brake system, the electric machine is operated as a generator whereby kinetic energy of the vehicle 100 may be converted to electrical energy and thereby slow down the speed of the vehicle.
[0062] The powertrain 110 and its components may be controlled by the vehicle's control system(s) via at least one control arrangement 120 in which the disclosed invention may be implemented. The at least one control arrangement 120 may be, for example, responsible for automatically controlling the speed of the vehicle 100.
[0063] The control arrangement 120 may be distributed on several control units configured to control different parts of the vehicle 100. The control arrangement 120 may e.g. include a minimum distance predicting unit 121, and a brake power applying unit 122 arranged for performing the method steps of the disclosed invention as is explained further. The control arrangement 120 will be described in further detail in
[0064] The vehicle 100 may further include at least one sensor 140, e.g. a camera located at suitable positions within the vehicle 100.
[0065] Further, the vehicle 100 may comprise a positioning system/unit 150. The positioning unit 150 may be based on a satellite navigation system such as the Navigation Signal Timing and Ranging Navstar, Global Positioning System GPS, Differential GPS DGPS, Galileo, GLONASS, or the like. Thus, the positioning unit may comprise a GPS receiver.
[0066] The proposed solution will now be described with reference to
[0067] The method 200 comprises steps 210-220 and is performed when the first vehicle 100 is to travel a downhill road section and when a second vehicle is travelling in front of the first vehicle. One example of a driving scenario in which embodiments of the invention may be implemented in shown in the upper part of
[0068] According to conventional methods, illustrated by the dashed line in
[0069] The present invention, on the other hand, comprises predicting in step 210 in
[0070] The present invention further comprises in step 220 in
[0071] Thus, the present invention predicts how the minimum distance to a second vehicle 300 would vary if different brake powers P.sub.brake_1, P.sub.brake_2, . . . , P.sub.brake_n would currently be applied in the approaching downhill road section 310. Based on this prediction, the method applies a suitable brake power, based on the predictions, when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310 such that at least the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min to the second vehicle 300 is maintained. According to the invention, the brake power may therefore be activated at an earlier point, i.e. already when the first vehicle 100 approaches the downhill road section between the time instance T.sub.0 and T.sub.1 resulting in a temporary increase of the distance D as illustrated by the solid line in
[0072] The plurality of minimum distances D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n predicted in step 210 in
[0073] Each minimum distance is predicted for a brake power applied in the approaching road section as will be explained with reference to
[0074]
[0075] The parallel predictions are performed for a current request for braking at t.sub.0 and based on the fact that the current distance at the time instance t.sub.0 is D.sub.current. As shown in
[0076] The prediction of the distance profiles may typically be performed when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. Preferably, the distance to the approaching downhill road section 310 should not be too short as to risk non-optimal driving conditions of the first vehicle in the subsequent road section. On the other hand, the prediction does not need to be performed when the distance to the approaching downhill road section is too long. When the distance to the approaching downhill road section is too long, the expected speed of the second vehicle 300, and thus the expected distance to the second vehicle 300 when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310, is difficult to predict and may be unreliable. Such unreliable prediction may not be suitable to use as basis for reliable and safe control the speed of the first vehicle 100. The prediction of the distance profiles may, according to a non-limiting example, be performed when the distance to the approaching downhill road section is between 200 and 800 meters according to an exemplifying implementation of the invention. The prediction of the distance profiles may, according to a further embodiments be performed continuously when the first vehicle 100 is in motion and applied according to the invention when braking is required in the approaching road section as will be explained further on.
[0077] The minimum distance to the second vehicle 300 in each distance profile is associated with the brake power for which the distance profile has been predicted. The brake power may, depending on implementation of the method 200, be a brake power applied by one of the plurality of brake systems 102, 104, 106, or a brake power constituting a sum of the brake power levels provided by a plurality of the brake systems 102, 104, 106. The brake power may for example correspond to a maximum power level deliverable by one of more of the plurality of brake systems 102, 104, 106 or a percentage of a maximum power level deliverable by one of more of the plurality of brake systems 102, 104, 106, as will be explained in more detail below.
[0078] For example, the brake power P.sub.brake_4 applied during simulation of the distance profile d in
[0079] Predicting a distance profile for an approaching road section may be done according to conventional methods. Examples of factors that may typically be considered in such prediction, in addition to geographical and topographical data relating to the approaching road section, include current speed of the first and the second vehicle, expected speed of the second vehicle in the approaching road section, vehicle configuration, vehicle load etc. Such factors may be obtained according to conventional methods. Advanced prediction methods may also take into consideration additional factors, such as weather conditions and current speed limitations for the approaching road section.
[0080] When the plurality of distance profiles has been predicted, the method 200 selects a brake power from the plurality of predicted distance profiles at least partly based on the minimum distance to the second vehicle, i.e., D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, D.sub.min_3, D.sub.min_4 in
[0081] The predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min may be a distance selected by a vehicle operator or by a speed control system. As previously explained the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min may be the smallest distance the first vehicle 100 is allowed to maintain to the second vehicle in front 300.
[0082] Thus, as illustrated in
[0083] The method 200 according to
[0084] In step I in
[0085] When no downhill road section 310 is detected in front of the first vehicle 100, the method 200 returns to step I in
[0086] In step III in
[0087] In an embodiment, each predicted minimum distance may correspond to a brake power to be applied when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310 by one or more auxiliary brake systems. In that way, the distance to the second vehicle when braking is required is mainly controlled by means auxiliary brake systems thereby reducing the need of using friction brakes.
[0088] In an embodiment, the one or more auxiliary brake systems may be capable of applying a brake power at a plurality of brake power levels. Moreover, the one or more auxiliary brake systems utilized to apply the brake power may be applied at one of a plurality of brake power levels. The brake systems to be applied as well as their applied power levels when predicting the plurality of minimum distances D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, . . . , D.sub.min_n may depend on the implementation of the invention. In one example, a set of brake systems to be applied and their applied power levels when predicting the plurality of minimum distances D.sub.min_1, D.sub.min_2, D.sub.min_n may be preconfigured in the control system of the first vehicle 100 and comprise brake systems that the particularly preferable and/or prioritized to apply when reducing the speed of the first vehicle 100.
[0089] In step IV in
[0090] In step V in
[0091] When at least one predicted minimum distance equals or is larger than a predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min, i.e. Yes in
[0092] In step VI, corresponding to step 220 in
[0093] In an embodiment, the applied brake power may correspond to a brake power to be applied to obtain a minimum distance exceeding the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min. The degree of which the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min is to be exceeded may e.g., be defined by a distance D.sub.1 exceeding the predetermined minimum distance. The distance D.sub.1 may be longer compared to the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min with the purpose of adjusting the vehicle's braking distance to the condition of travelling downhill thereby obtaining an increased driving and braking safety. Moreover, the distance D.sub.1 may be defined such that when D.sub.1 is maintained or exceeded when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310, the need of using the friction brake system, such as wheel brakes is eliminated or at least reduced. Thus, the minimum distance D.sub.1 may be defined such that it can be maintained or exceeded by means of at least one of the plurality of brake systems in the first vehicle 100 other than the friction brake system. Moreover, a longer distance to the second vehicle 300 in front when travelling in downhill enables energy efficient operation of the vehicle as will be explained further on with reference to step IX in
[0094] In an embodiment, the applied brake power may correspond to the brake power to be applied to obtain a minimum distance within a predetermined distance interval ID. The predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may be a distance interval of distances exceeding the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min. Said predetermined distance interval I.sub.D is, as illustrated in
[0095] The predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may be predetermined such that the need of using the friction brake system, such as wheel brakes when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310 is eliminated or at least reduced and at the same time such that using excessive brake power is avoided. In an embodiment, the predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may be selected by an operator of the first vehicle 100. The predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may for example be selected as an interval about a reference distance selected by the vehicle operator i.e., the average distance to the second vehicle 300 the operator wishes to be maintained. The predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may be selected for the driving scenario of approaching and/or travelling in a downhill road section. In another example, the predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may be set automatically in the vehicle's automatic speed control systems when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. The predetermined distance interval I.sub.D may, as described above, be selected based on parameters such as road gradient, the weight of the first vehicle 100 and the first vehicle speed to mention a few. As an example, a shorter distance interval I.sub.D may be required on a steep downhill road section to avoid using the friction brake system compared to road sections with lower gradients. In similar fashion a heavy vehicle may require a shorter distance interval I.sub.D compared to a less heavy vehicle.
[0096] In an embodiment, when more than one brake power from the different brake powers P.sub.brake_1, P.sub.brake_2, . . . , P.sub.brake_n result in a predicted minimum distance at least corresponding to the predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min, the brake power to be applied in step VI in
[0097] The brake power may, for example, be selected based on a predetermined priority of the plurality of brake systems. In other words, the plurality of brake systems in the first vehicle 100 may be given different priorities to optimize energy efficiency, braking efficiency, drivability aspects or user comfort, to mention a few and may depend on parameters like the characteristics of the brake system and the vehicle configuration. Consequently, the brake power applied in step VI in
[0098] The brake power may be selected based on the magnitude of a brake power required for braking the first vehicle 100 when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. The required brake power may be determined according to conventional methods using e.g. Newton's laws of motion so that at least a predetermined minimum distance D.sub.pred_min to the second vehicle 300 is maintained when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. In that way an appropriate brake power may be applied by means the one or more brake system which is able to deliver the required brake power.
[0099] Furthermore, the brake power may be selected based on a duration of the application of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310 to produce the brake power required for braking the first vehicle 100. By determining the duration of the application of a brake system, the suitability of using the brake system may be determined.
[0100] Furthermore, the brake power may be selected based on the power level of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310 to produce the brake power required for braking the first vehicle 100. By taking into consideration the power level of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged the suitability of using the brake system may be determined. The brake power may, for example, be selected such that the applied brake system is able to withstand the required power level during the braking operation.
[0101] In a further embodiment, the brake power may be selected based on an efficiency of at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310 to produce the brake power required for braking the first vehicle 100. The efficiency of the brake system may be understood as the ability of braking and energy efficiency of the brakes. By taking into consideration the efficiency of the at least one of the plurality of brake systems to be engaged the suitability of using the brake system may be determined. The brake power may, for example be selected to optimize efficient braking of the vehicle 100.
[0102] In short, different brake systems may be associated with a predetermined priority. Merely as an illustrative and non-limiting example, the first vehicle 100 may comprise a retarder, a compression brake and an exhaust brake. These may then be associated with different priority, e.g. first use the exhaust brake, then if necessary add (or switch to) the retarder, then if necessary add (or switch to) the compression brake. Further in this illustrative and non-limiting example, each of these brake systems may be associated with different magnitude of brake power, which may or may not meet the magnitude of a brake power required for braking the first vehicle 100 when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. It may be that one of the brake systems alone is sufficient or it may be that a combination of brake systems may be required to meet the magnitude of a brake power required for braking the first vehicle 100 when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. Further in this illustrative and non-limiting example, the duration of the application of a brake system or brake systems may be a factor to take into calculation when determining the brake power applied, as well as the efficiency of such (a) brake system(s).
[0103] In step VII in
[0104]
[0105] In step VIII in
[0106] Thus, in embodiments, the plurality of minimum distances may be predicted repeatedly at different time instances when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310. The prediction of minimum distances may, according to a non-limiting example be performed every second. Each prediction, at a specific time instance, may result in a plurality of updated minimum distances. Based on the updated minimum distances the applied brake power may be adjusted in step VI in
[0107] In step IX in
[0108] After step IX in
[0109] According to an aspect of the invention, a control arrangement 120 for controlling a cruise controller of the first vehicle 100 is presented. The control arrangement 120 includes means 121 arranged predicting a plurality of minimum distances corresponding to different brake powers to be applied by at least one of the plurality of brake systems when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310, each minimum distance constituting a resulting minimum distance to the second vehicle 300.
[0110] The control arrangement 120 further includes means 122 arranged for applying, by at least one of the plurality of brake systems, a brake power corresponding to a minimum distance of the plurality of minimum distances such that at least the predetermined minimum distance to the second vehicle 300 is maintained when approaching and/or travelling the downhill road section 310.
[0111] The control arrangement 120, e.g. a device or a control device, according to the invention may be arranged for performing all of the above, in the claims, and in the herein described embodiments method steps. The control arrangement 120 is hereby provided with the above-described advantages for each respective embodiment.
[0112] The invention is also related to a vehicle 100 including the control arrangement 120.
[0113] Now turning to
[0114] In addition, the control arrangement 700/120 is provided with devices 711, 712, 713, 714 for receiving and transmitting input and output signals. These input and output signals can contain waveforms, impulses, or other attributes which, by the devices 711, 713 for the reception of input signals, can be detected as information and can be converted into signals which can be processed by the computing unit 701. These signals are then made available to the computing unit 701. The devices 712, 714 for the transmission of output signals are arranged to convert signals received from the computing unit 701 in order to create output signals by, e.g., modulating the signals, which can be transmitted to other parts of and/or systems in the vehicle 100.
[0115] Each of the connections to the devices for receiving and transmitting input and output signals can be constituted by one or more of a cable; a data bus, such as a Controller Area Network CAN bus, a Media Orientated Systems Transport MOST bus, or some other bus configuration; or by a wireless connection. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the above-stated computer can be constituted by the computing unit 701 and that the above-stated memory can be constituted by the memory unit 702.
[0116] Control systems in modern vehicles commonly comprise communication bus systems consisting of one or more communication buses for linking a number of electronic control units ECUs, or controllers, and various components located on the vehicle. Such a control system can comprise a large number of control units and the responsibility for a specific function can be divided amongst more than one control unit. Vehicles of the shown type thus often comprise significantly more control units than are shown in
[0117] In a shown embodiment, the invention may be implemented by the one or more above mentioned control units 121 and 122. The invention can also, however, be implemented wholly or partially in one or more other control units already in the vehicle 100, or in some control unit dedicated to the invention.
[0118] Here and in this document, units are often described as being arranged for performing steps of the method according to the invention. This also includes that the units are designed to and/or configured to perform these method steps.
[0119] The one or more control units 121 and 122 are in
[0120] The person skilled in the art will appreciate that a the herein described embodiments may also be implemented in a computer program, which, when it is executed in a computer, instructs the computer to execute the method. The computer program is usually constituted by a computer program product 703 stored on a non-transitory/non-volatile digital storage medium, in which the computer program is incorporated in the computer-readable medium of the computer program product. The computer-readable medium comprises a suitable memory, such as, e.g.: Read-Only Memory ROM, Programmable Read-Only Memory PROM, Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory EPROM, Flash memory, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory EEPROM, a hard disk unit, etc.
[0121] The invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments. Instead, the invention relates to, and encompasses all different embodiments being included within the scope of the independent claims.