AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CUSTOMIZING DIALYSATE SOLUTIONS
20240252730 ยท 2024-08-01
Inventors
- Steve J. Lindo (Chicago, IL, US)
- Richard A. Pendergraft (Norman, OK, US)
- Jacob Henderson (Oklahoma City, OK, US)
Cpc classification
A61M1/1605
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M1/155
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M2205/52
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61M1/28
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M1/14
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
An automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) device, system and method is provided, which utilizes mechanisms to admix customized dialysate solutions from multiple sources, while maximizing volumetric accuracy. The present automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) device can accomplish these goals all within the convenience and comfort of the patient's home utilizing filtered tap water.
Claims
1. A method for determining an appropriate peritoneal dialysis prescription tailored to meet treatment needs of a patient, the method comprising the steps of; providing an input computing device configured for receiving health parameters of the patient; inputting the patient health parameters into the computing device; providing at least one bag containing an electrolyte solution; calculating a concentration of electrolytes from the electrolyte solution for a treatment solution based in the patient health parameters; inputting the calculated concentration of electrolytes from the electrolyte solution into an automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) device; mixing the concentration of electrolytes in the APD device into the treatment solution suitable for administration to the patient; and, administering the treatment solution to the patient.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrolytes are at least one of sodium or potassium.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the method further includes removing a determined quantity of sodium from the patient's bloodstream with each treatment.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the method further includes adding a determined quantity of potassium to the patient's bloodstream with each treatment.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further includes providing a bag containing a dextrose solution.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the method further includes using the input computing device to calculate an amount of dextrose to deliver to the patient based on a sodium concentration.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the input computing device automatically adjusts the dextrose concentration higher when a lower sodium concentration is selected.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the method further includes maintaining an osmotic gradient by adjusting the dextrose concentration as a function of the sodium concentration.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein the method further includes using the input computing device to calculate an amount of dextrose solution to deliver to the patient based on a potassium concentration.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the input computing device automatically adjusts the dextrose concentration lower when a higher potassium concentration is selected.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the method further includes maintaining an osmotic gradient by adjusting the dextrose concentration as a function of the potassium concentration.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0038] The drawing figures depict one or more implementations in accord with the present concepts, by way of example only, not by way of limitations. In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements.
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0047] The automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) device and system of the present disclosure, in the preferred embodiments, utilizes mechanisms to admix customized dialysate solutions from multiple sources, while maximizing volumetric accuracy. The present automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) device can accomplish these goals all within the convenience and comfort of the patient's home utilizing filtered tap water.
[0048]
[0049] As shown in in
[0050]
[0051] As further illustrated in
[0052]
[0053] The pump chambers 32 are formed by a concave rigid cassette body 33 covered on both sides by flexible plastic sheeting 34. When appropriate pneumatic pressure from the pneumatic manifold 16 is applied to the flexible plastic sheeting 34, the fluid within the pump chamber 32 is forced out as the sheeting bends to approach or touch the hard plastic pump chamber's concave base 33. Fluid is drawn into the pump chamber 32 by applying negative (vacuum) pressure to the outer surface of the flexible sheeting 34.
[0054] The disposable cassette 30 acts like a two-story house, with some fluid paths routed on the top story or top section 30a of the chamber 32, while other fluid paths routed on the bottom story or bottom section 30b of the chamber 32, with a piece of rigid plastic 30c separating the top and bottom story, and strategically placed through holes 30d connecting the two stories or sections. Each pump chamber 32 has holes 30d to allow fluid to be routed to or from the top 30a or bottom 30b of the chambers, depending on the fluid source. The drain line DL is routed to the top section 30a such that air, when partially purged, will exit to the drain. The patient line P is routed to the bottom section 30b to avoid delivery of air when the pump chamber's contents are partially delivered to the patient. In this manner, the cassette's pump chambers 32 can hold a certain volume of air. The volume of each pump chamber 32 is larger than the holdup volume of the tubing going from the cassette 30 to the admix bag 114 (
[0055] The APD disposable cassette 30 utilizes multiple valves 31, as referred to as volcano valves, to control fluid routing to and from each of the following 9 sources: Patient, Drain, Admix Bag, Sterilized Water, Dextrose Bag Concentration A, Dextrose Bag Concentration B, Saline/Potassium Bag, Buffer Bag, and Last Fill Bag. The Saline Bag may consist of normal saline (0.9%) or hypertonic saline (3% or 5%). The Potassium Bag may consist of highly concentrated potassium chloride in water for injection, potassium chloride in normal saline (0.9%), or potassium chloride in 5% dextrose and saline, all currently commercially available. All sources listed as bags could alternatively be lyophilized powders in vials or similar containers. The powders may be reconstituted by the APD device by routing sterilized water to the vial or container, then drawing from the vial or container prior to delivery.
[0056]
[0057] As shown in the schematic of
[0058]
[0059] The governing equations are shown below:
There are two sides containing air, the disposables side, designated as d, and the reference chamber side, designated as r. Each side has an initial state, designated by i, and a final state after pressures between the two sides have been essentially equalized, designated by f.
[0060] The number of moles of air on the disposables side in the initial state is calculated as:
where V.sub.d is the unknown volume of the disposables side to calculate.
[0061] The number of moles of air on the reference chamber side in the initial state is calculated as:
where V.sub.r is the volume of air in the reference chamber, which is a known, fixed value.
[0062] The number of moles of air on the disposables side in the final state is calculated as:
[0063] The number of moles of air on the reference chamber side in the final state is calculated as:
[0064] Since the total number of moles of both sides put together remains constant (air is simply shuffled from one side to the other as pressure is released from the reference chamber to the disposables side), the formula is the following:
[0065] Therefore, by substitution, the calculation is the following:
[0066] The R term cancels out. Rearranging, the calculation is:
[0067] Solving for Vd, the calculation is:
This is the equation that governs the volume calculations if using temperature measurement.
[0068] However, if temperature of the reference chamber and the disposables side are held in thermal contact with each other such that they are essentially constant, the equation simplifies as:
[0069] Additional temperature compensation via direct temperature measurement of the volume reference chamber and/or pump chamber may be added to increase volumetric accuracy, since the Ideal Gas Law calculates volume as a function of pressure and temperature as described above.
[0070] Alternatively, the temperature of the volume reference chamber may be held quasi-constant at or near body temperature by placing the volume reference chamber in thermal contact with the cassette's pump chamber and/or by including a thermally conductive wire mesh material inside the volume reference chamber to provide a high degree of surface area for quickly stabilizing the gas temperature within the volume reference chamber even after a rapid temperature excursion due to rapid pressure changes within the reference chamber. In this alternative, no temperature measurement is necessary.
[0071]
[0072] In the past, clinicians have not been able to customize the sodium or potassium used in APD therapy. Clinicians currently have PC-based software tools to determine how to prescribe the dextrose concentration and dwell times in order to remove a certain volume of ultrafiltration, but they do not have any tools to help them prescribe the sodium concentration and dwell times in order to remove a certain quantity of sodium from the patient's bloodstream with each therapy. These existing prescription optimization tools have historically been based on kinetic modeling of solute transport across the peritoneum. The present disclosure further includes an easy-to-use therapy software that will aid clinicians in the selection of optimized sodium, potassium, and glucose concentrations based on a patient's specific health factors, so that clinicians will easily be able to use the present APD device for optimal patient outcomes.
[0073] As illustrated in
[0074] For example, the present APD device 10 and system 100 utilizes the PC-based software application 200 to estimate the amount of dextrose to deliver to the patient as a function of the sodium content. Since both dextrose and sodium are osmotic agents, if a patient is given a lower-than-normal sodium dialysate solution, the dextrose concentration must be adjusted upward in order to maintain the same equivalent osmotic gradient as a normal sodium (i.e. 132-134 mmol/l) dialysate solution would have had. An advantage of the present software application 200 is that the software will calculate the sodium (or potassium) concentration to deliver, based on the user-entered desired weekly or daily sodium removal (or potassium addition) target, along with the patient's physical characteristics 201 such as peritoneal transport type (High, High Average, Low Average, or Low), body surface area, and blood sodium (or potassium) concentration.
[0075] The software application 200 will also automatically calculate the concentration of dextrose and volume to deliver from each of the source containers, based on the sodium concentration and ultrafiltration (UF) targets, to achieve the same osmolality of the equivalent normal sodium (or potassium) concentration and normal dextrose concentration solution that would be needed to achieve those UF targets. This software application 200 could be installed on the clinician's PC 202 and/or be accessible via web browser.
[0076] The known 3-pore kinetic model of peritoneal dialysis may be used to estimate therapy outcomes based on the solution concentrations and patient's body characteristics. For example, the present software application 200 and/or the ADP device 10 programming screens will calculate the appropriate sodium removal or potassium addition prescription for an individual patient. As shown in
[0077] Yet another advantage in utilizing the present software application 200 is that the final clinician-approved dialysis prescription can then be remotely downloaded to the APD device 10 such that the patient does not have to manually enter each of the prescription parameters on the APD device's user interface. This prescription could be adjusted regularly as needed, based on new blood measurements that occur approximately once per month, using the same input parameters 201 shown in
Operation and Examples
[0078] In operation, and by way of example, the present APD device 10 and system 100 envisions two concentrated dialysate dextrose solutions, Dextrose A and Dextrose B, intended to be mixed in various proportions to produce an intermediate dextrose concentration after dilution with sterile water, hypertonic saline, and buffer solution. Dextrose A is intended to produce 1.0% dextrose solution at 100 mEq/l after dilution, while Dextrose B is intended to produce 4.5% dextrose at 100 mEq/l after water dilution and before any hypertonic saline addition. Both Dextrose A and Dextrose B would contain 30% Dextrose Hydrous.
[0079] Dextrose A, in one embodiment, would contain the following composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 30.0 g, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 552.0 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O) 153.0 mg.
[0080] Dextrose B, in one embodiment, would contain the following composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 30.0 g, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 122.7 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O) 34.0 mg.
[0081] The Buffer Solution, in one embodiment, would contain the following composition per 100 ml: Sodium Chloride 7014 mg, Sodium Lactate (C.sub.3H.sub.5NaO.sub.3) 3360 mg, Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO.sub.3) 4200 mg.
[0082] A 200 ml container of Dextrose A, after dilution with a 300 ml container of Buffer Solution and 5500 ml of sterile water, would yield the following solution composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 1.0 g, Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 350.7 mg, Sodium Lactate (C.sub.3H.sub.5NaO.sub.3) 168 mg, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 18.4 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O) 5.10 mg, Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO.sub.3) 210 mg.
[0083] A 900 ml container of Dextrose B, after dilution with a 300 ml container of Buffer Solution and 4800 ml of sterile water, would yield the following solution composition/100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 4.5 g, Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 350.7 mg, Sodium Lactate (C.sub.3H.sub.5NaO.sub.3) 168 mg, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 18.4 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O) 5.10 mg, Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO.sub.3) 210 mg.
[0084] The admixing of Dextrose A, Dextrose B, Buffer Solution, and Sterile Water could be augmented by further admixing hypertonic saline in one embodiment to increase the sodium concentration from 100 mEq/l to any intermediate value up to and including 170 mEq/l. The volume of sterile water used for dilution is reduced by the corresponding amount of hypertonic saline added. As an example if a dextrose concentration of 2.0% and a sodium concentration of 110 mEq/l is desired (rather than 100 mEq/l), an additional 117 ml of 3% hypertonic saline would be added to 143 ml of Dextrose A, 257 ml of Dextrose B, and 300 ml of Buffer Solution, and 5183 ml of sterile water to create 6000 ml of admixed solution.
[0085] In another example, the present APD device 10 utilizes similar ultra-low sodium solutions as the previous paragraph, except without the use of buffer solutions. Again, both Dextrose A and Dextrose B would contain 30% Dextrose Hydrous.
[0086] Dextrose A, in one embodiment, would contain the following composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 30.0 g, Sodium Chloride 10523 mg, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 552.0 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O) 153.0 mg.
[0087] Dextrose B, in one embodiment, would contain the following composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 30.0 g, Sodium Chloride 2339 mg, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 122.7 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O) 34.0 mg.
[0088] A 200 ml container of Dextrose A, after dilution with 5800 ml of sterile water, would yield the following solution composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 1.0 g, Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 350.8 mg, Sodium Lactate (C.sub.3H.sub.5NaO.sub.3) 448 mg, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2.Math.2H.sub.2O) 18.4 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.6H.sub.2O) 5.10 mg.
[0089] A 900 ml container of Dextrose B, after dilution with 4100 ml of sterile water, would yield the following solution composition per 100 ml: Dextrose Hydrous 4.5 g, Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 350.8 mg, Sodium Lactate (C.sub.3H.sub.5NaO.sub.3) 448 mg, Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl.sub.2).Math.2H.sub.2O) 18.4 mg, Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCl.sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O) 5.10 mg.
[0090] The admixing of Dextrose A, Dextrose B, and Sterile Water could be augmented by further admixing hypertonic saline in one embodiment to increase the sodium concentration from 100 mEq/l to any intermediate value up to and including 170 mEq/l. The volume of sterile water used for dilution is reduced by the corresponding amount of hypertonic saline added. As an example if a dextrose concentration of 2.0% and a sodium concentration of 110 mEq/l is desired (rather than 100 mEq/l), an additional 117 ml of 3% hypertonic saline would be added to 143 ml of Dextrose A, 257 ml of Dextrose B, and 5483 ml of sterile water to create 6000 ml of admixed solution.
[0091] It should be noted that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages.