Arc Detection and Prevention in a Power Generation System
20240258966 ยท 2024-08-01
Inventors
- Ilan Yoscovich (Givatayim, IL)
- Guy Sella (Bitan Aharon, IL)
- Meir Gazit (Ashkelon, IL)
- Yoav Galin (Raanana, IL)
- David Braginsky (Yokne'am, IL)
- Lior Handelsman (Givatayim, IL)
- Meir Adest (Modiin, IL)
Cpc classification
Y02E10/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
H02S50/00
ELECTRICITY
G01R31/12
PHYSICS
Abstract
A method for arc detection in a system including a photovoltaic panel and a load connectible to the photovoltaic panel with a DC power line. The method measures power delivered to the load thereby producing a first measurement result of the power delivered to the load. Power produced by the photovoltaic panel is also measured, thereby producing a second measurement result of power produced by the photovoltaic panel. The first measurement result is compared with the second measurement result thereby producing a differential power measurement result. Upon the differential power measurement result being more than a threshold value, an alarm condition may also be set. The second measurement result may be modulated and transmitted over the DC power line.
Claims
1. A system comprising: a plurality of power converters, wherein each power converter of the plurality of power converters is configured to: convert an input power to an output power; determine a first electrical parameter related to the power converter; determine a second electrical parameter related to the power converter; determine a parameter difference based on a comparison between the first electrical parameter and the second electrical parameter; compare the parameter difference to a threshold value; and set an alarm condition based on the parameter difference being greater than the threshold value.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first electrical parameter is a first power, the second electrical parameter is a second power, and the parameter difference is a power difference.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first electrical parameter is a first noise, the second electrical parameter is a second noise, and the parameter difference is a noise difference.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein each power converter is configured to shut down based on the parameter difference being greater than the threshold value.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein each power converter of the plurality of power converters is configured to communicate with at least one other power converter.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein each power converter of the plurality of power converters is configured to communicate using power line communication.
7. The system of claim 5, wherein each power converter of the plurality of power converters is configured to communicate using wireless communication.
8. A method comprising: converting, with each power converter of a plurality of power converters, an input power to an output power; determining, by each power converter of the plurality of power converters, a first electrical parameter related to the power converter; determining, by each power converter of the plurality of power converters, a second electrical parameter related to the power converter; determining, by each power converter of the plurality of power converters, a parameter difference based on a comparison between the first electrical parameter and the second electrical parameter; comparing, by each power converter of a plurality of power converters, the parameter difference to a threshold value; and setting, by each power converter of a plurality of power converters, an alarm condition based on the parameter difference being greater than the threshold value.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first electrical parameter is a first power, the second electrical parameter is a second power, and the parameter difference is a power difference.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the first electrical parameter is a first noise, the second electrical parameter is a second noise, and the parameter difference is a noise difference.
11. The method of claim 8, further comprising shutting down each power converter of the plurality of power converters based on the parameter difference being greater than the threshold value.
12. The method of claim 8, further comprising communicating, by each power converter of the plurality of power converters, with at least one other power converter.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the communicating, by each power converter of the plurality of power converters, is using power line communication.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the communicating, by each power converter of the plurality of power converters, is using wireless communication.
15. An electronic module comprising a power converter configured to: convert an input power to an output power; determine a first electrical parameter related to the power converter; determine a second electrical parameter related to the power converter; determine a parameter difference based on a comparison between the first electrical parameter and the second electrical parameter; compare the parameter difference to a threshold value; and set an alarm condition based on the parameter difference being greater than the threshold value.
16. The electronic module of claim 15, wherein the first electrical parameter is a first power, the second electrical parameter is a second power, and the parameter difference is a power difference.
17. The electronic module of claim 15, wherein the first electrical parameter is a first noise, the second electrical parameter is a second noise, and the parameter difference is a noise difference.
18. The electronic module of claim 15, wherein the power converter is configured to shut down based on the parameter difference being greater than the threshold value.
19. The electronic module of claim 15, wherein the power converter is configured to communicate with at least one other power converter.
20. The electronic module of claim 19, wherein the power converter is configured to communicate using at least one of: power line communication and wireless communication.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to the like elements throughout. The embodiments are described below to explain the present invention by referring to the figures.
[0027] Reference is made to
[0028] Reference is made to
[0029] Arc noise is approximate to white noise, meaning that the power spectral density is nearly equal throughout the frequency spectrum. Additionally, the amplitude of the arc noise signal has very nearly a Gaussian probability density function. The root mean square (RMS) arc noise voltage signal (V.sub.n) is given in equation Eq. 1, as follows:
[0035] Reference is now made to
[0036] Reference is now made to
[0037] Reference is now made to
[0038] One or more controllers may be configured to compare the noise voltage at panel (s) 200 with the noise voltage at the load 250 by, for example, calculating the difference between noise voltage measured at panel 200 and the noise voltage measured at load 250 (step 404). In this example, if the difference calculated in step 404 shows that noise voltage measured at panel(s) 200 may be greater than the noise voltage measured at load 250 (step 406) according to one or more predefined criteria, an alarm condition of potential arcing may be set (step 408).
[0039] Further to this example, the comparison (step 404) also may involve comparisons of previously stored RMS noise voltage levels of panel? 200 and/or load 250 in a memory of controller 204 at various times, for example, the time immediately after installation of power generation system 201. The previously stored RMS noise voltage levels of both panel? 200 and load 250 are, in this example, in the form of a look-up-table stored in the memory of controller 204. The look-up-table has RMS noise voltage levels of both panel(s) 200 and load 250 at various times of the day, day of the week or time of year for example, which can be compared to presently measured RMS noise voltage levels of both panel(s) 200 and load 250.
[0040] In this exemplary example, if the comparison of the measured load 250 RMS noise voltage datum with the measured panel(s) 200 RMS noise voltage datum may be over a certain threshold (step 406) of RMS noise voltage difference an alarm condition of potential arcing may be set (step 408) otherwise arc detection continues with step 400.
[0041] Reference is now made to
[0042] The outputs of modules 202 and module 202a may be connected in series to form a serial string 520. Two strings 520 may be shown connected in parallel. In one string 520, a situation is shown of an arc voltage (V.sub.A) which may be occurring serially in string 520. Load 250 may be a DC to AC inverter. Attached to load 250 may be a central controller 204. Controller 204 optionally measures the voltage (VT) across load 250 as well as the current of load 250 via current sensor 206. Current sensor 206 may be attached to controller 204 and coupled to the power line connection of load 250.
[0043] Depending on the solar radiation on panels 200, in a first case, some modules 202 may operate to convert power on the inputs to give fixed output voltages (V.sub.i) and the output power of a module 202 that may be dependent on the current flowing in string 520. The current flowing in string 520 may be related to the level of irradiation of panels 200, e.g., the more irradiation, the more current in string 520, and the output power of a module 202 is more.
[0044] In a second case, modules 202 may be operating to convert powers on the input to be the same powers on the output; so for example if 200 watts is on the input of a module 202, module 202 may endeavor to have 200 watts on the output. However, because modules 202 may be connected serially in a string 520, the current flowing in string 520 may be the same by virtue of Kirchhoff's law. The current flowing in string 520 being the same means that the output voltage (V.sub.i) of a module should vary in order to establish that the power on the output of a module 202 may be the same as the power on the input of a module 202. Therefore, in this example, as string 520 current increases, the output voltage (V.sub.i) of modules 202 decreases or as string 520 current decreases, the output voltage (V.sub.i) of modules 202 increases to a maximum value. When the output voltage (V.sub.i) of modules 202 increases to the maximum value, the second case may be similar to the first case in that the output voltage (V.sub.i) may be now effectively fixed.
[0045] Modules 202 in string 520 may have a master/slave relationship with one of modules 202a configured as master and other modules 202 configured as slaves.
[0046] Since current may be the same throughout string 520 in this example, master module may be configured to measure current of string 520. Modules 202 optionally measure their output voltage V.sub.i so that the total string power may be determined. Output voltages of slave modules 202, in this example, may be measured and communicated by wireless or over power line communications, for instance to master unit 202a so that a single telemetry from module 202a to controller 204 may be sufficient to communicate the output power of the string. Master module 202a in string 520 may be variously configured, such as to communicate with the other slave modules 202 for control of slave modules 202. Master module 202a, in this example, may be configured to receive a keep alive signal from controller 204, which may be conveyed to slave modules 202. The optional keep alive signal sent from controller 204 communicated by wireless or over power line communications, may be present or absent. The presence of the keep alive signal may cause the continued operation of modules 202 and/or via master module 202a. The absence of the keep alive signal may cause the ceasing of operation of modules 202 and/or via master module 202a (i.e. current ceases to flow in string 520). Multiple keep alive signals each having different frequencies corresponding to each string 520 may be used so that a specific string 520 may be stopped from producing power where there may be a case of arcing whilst other strings 520 continue to produce power.
[0047] Reference is now also made to
[0053] The comparison between string power of string 520 and of the power (V.sub.T?I.sub.L) delivered to load 250 may be achieved by subtracting the sum of the string 520 power (?P.sub.IN+?V.sub.iI.sub.L) from the power delivered to load 250 (V.sub.T?I.sub.L) to produce a difference. If the difference may be less than a pre-defined threshold (step 506), the measurement of power available to string 520 (step 500) and load 250 (step 502) continues. In decision block 506, if the difference may be greater than the previously defined threshold, then an alarm condition may be set and a series arc condition may be occurring. A situation of series arcing typically causes the transmission of a keep alive signal to modules 202 from controller 204 to discontinue, which causes modules 202 to shut down. Modules 202 shutting down may be a preferred way to stop series arcing in string 520.
[0054] Reference is now made to
[0055] Reference is now made to
[0061] The impedance of load 250 may be adjusted (step 510) optionally under control of central controller 204. Typically, if load 250 is an inverter, controller 204 adjusts the input impedance of load 250 by variation of a control parameter of the inverter. A change in the input impedance of load 250 causes the voltage across the input of load 250 to change by virtue of Ohm's law. The voltage (V.sub.T) as shown in circuit 501a across load 250 may be therefore made to vary an amount ?V as a result of the input impedance of load 250 being adjusted. The voltage across load 250 may be now V.sub.T+?V and the load 250 current (I.sub.L) may be now I.sub.2.
[0062] A second differential power result 522 may be now produced as a result of performing again method 503 (shown in
[0068] The first differential power result 508 may be compared with the second differential power result 522 (step 524), for example, using controller 204 to subtract the first differential power result 508 from the second differential power result 522 to produce a difference. The difference may be expressed by equation Eq. 5, which may be as a result of subtracting equation Eq.3 from equation Eq.4, as follows:
[0069] The summed output power (P.sub.IN) of each module 202 for circuit 501a may be thus eliminated.
[0070] Equation Eq. 5 may be re-arranged by controller 204 by performing a modulo operator function on equation Eq.5 to obtain an arc coefficient ? as shown in equation Eq. 6.
[0072] Controller 204, for example, may be configured to calculate coefficient ? according to the above formula and measurements. A non-zero value of arc coefficient ? shown in equation Eq. 7 causes an alarm condition to be set (step 528) otherwise another first differential power result 508 may be produced (step 503). A situation of series arcing typically causes the keep alive signal to be removed by controller 204, causing modules 202 to shut down. Modules 202 shutting down may be a preferred way to stop series arcing in string 520.
[0073] The definite articles a, an is used herein, such as an arc voltage and/or arc current, a load have the meaning of one or more that is one or more arc voltages and/or arc currents or one or more loads.
[0074] While the embodiments of aspects of the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of examples, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications and other applications of the invention may be made.