Travelling wave antenna feed structures
10230171 ยท 2019-03-12
Assignee
Inventors
- John T. Apostolos (Lyndeborough, NH)
- Benjamin McMahon (Nottingham, NH, US)
- Brian Molen (Windham, NH, US)
- Judy Feng (Nashua, NH, US)
- William Mouyos (Windham, NH)
Cpc classification
H01Q13/28
ELECTRICITY
H01Q21/22
ELECTRICITY
H01Q21/08
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H01Q21/22
ELECTRICITY
H01Q13/28
ELECTRICITY
H01Q13/20
ELECTRICITY
H01Q21/06
ELECTRICITY
H01Q21/08
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
Techniques for implementing series-fed antenna arrays with a variable dielectric waveguide. In one implementation, coupling elements with optional controlled phase shifters are placed adjacent each radiating element of the array. To avoid frequency sensitivity of the resulting array, one or more waveguides have a variable propagation constant. The variable waveguide may use certain materials exhibiting this phenomenon, or may have configurable gaps between layers. Plated-through holes and pins can control the gaps; and/or a 2-D circular or a rectangular travelling wave array of scattering elements can be used as well.
Claims
1. An antenna apparatus comprising: a dielectric waveguide formed of two or more layers, with gaps formed between the layers; a control element arranged to adjust a size of at least one of the gaps, where the control element includes at least one piezoelectric, electroactive material, or mechanical position control; a plurality of radiating antenna connections disposed adjacent the waveguide; and a plurality of couplers, with a coupler disposed between the dielectric waveguide and each radiating antenna connection.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 additionally comprising: a delay element disposed between each coupler and radiating antenna connection.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the dielectric waveguide additionally comprises: a pair of elongated, rectangular waveguides, each waveguide having a top surface, a bottom surface, an excitation end, and a load end.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the radiating antenna connections are disposed between each of the pair of waveguides along the top surface.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein each coupler is disposed between a selected one of the pair of waveguides and a selected one of the radiating antenna connections.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein each coupler is a quadrature coupler.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT
(23) 1. Introduction
(24) In a microwave phased array antenna, it is desirable to simplify the design and manufacture of the power dividing phase network. In such components, individual phase controlling elements are placed between each radiating element in series. In this series fed configuration, a transmission line (which may be a waveguide or any other Transverse Electromagnetic Mode (TEM) line) contains all of the antenna element tap points which control power division and sidelobe levels, as well as the phase shifters which control the scan angle of the array. This arrangement provides a savings in the needed electronic circuitry as compared to a parallel feed structure which would typically require many more two-way power dividers to implement the same function.
(25) By way of introduction, this simplification can be provided by performing the phase shift function by varying the wave propagation velocity of the transmission line, thereby inducing a change in electrical length between the elements. The resulting electrical length is given by
=L,for =2f/v
where L is the length of the transmission line between elements, and is the wave propagation constant, inversely proportional to wave velocity, v. Wave velocity is conveniently controlled in certain types of waveguides by varying the dielectric constant of the material which in turn directly affects C, the capacitance per unit length of the transmission through the relationship
v=1/{square root over (LC)}
with L being the inductance per unit length. This arrangement however has the effect of changing the characteristic impedance of the line which equals
Z.sub.0={square root over (LC)}
(26) The characteristic impedance of the transmission line is thus a fundamental parameter of the implementation, affecting power distribution, efficiency, input Voltage Standing Wave Ration (VSWR) and the like. The fact that line impedance and velocity are coupled in this way is typically considered a fundamental limitation of the series fed array. Thus, scan angle and power bandwidth are coupled together; two parameters that are normally independent in other antenna systems.
(27) However if the variable waveguide/transmission line appears are a reflection type function, the desired phase shift may still be achieved using the same fundamental type of C variation. In this case, reflections due to the characteristic impedance mismatch of the variable line are canceled at the input, as long as the two transmission line segments (of L) are equal. This arrangement occurs in many microwave circuits called quadrature coupled circuits. In this case, the approach is to provide a variable transmission line, with quadrature coupling to the radiating elements.
(28) 2. Waveguide Coupler/Coaxial Holes to L-Probe-Fed-in-Quadrature Patch
(29) In one implementation, a quadrature coupler uses coaxial holes and an L-shaped probe to feed each radiating antenna element in a linear array. This arrangement solves the problem of how to control the coupling between the variable dielectric waveguide and the antenna elements to achieve accurate weighting of the antenna elements, while still keeping the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) low enough to eliminate the photonic band gap null for broad side angles.
(30) One embodiment of such a waveguide coupler 101, shown in
(31)
(32) In one embodiment, the unit waveguide coupler 101 is formed in a Printed Circuit Board (PCB) with walls defined by vias or metal plates, but the unit coupler 101 can also be formed in a traditional waveguide structure. The waveguide coupler 101 need only be relatively short in length, as it is used to transfer a guided mode from the main waveguide structure 102, up to the radiating element.
(33) The main waveguide(s) 102 are formed from a dielectric material or mechanical configuration for which the propagation constant can be varied, either by using materials where dielectric constant is changed via a bias voltage, or through mechanical layer separation in multilayer waveguides. See the discussion below, as well as our related U.S. patent Ser. No. 13/372,117 filed Feb. 13, 2012 for more details of adjustable waveguide structures.
(34)
(35) Above the L-probe 105 sits another substrate 108 and on top of that the patch radiator element 104. The L-probe 105 is capacitively coupled to the patch radiator 104. The shunt capacitance between the L-probe and ground plane is cancelled with the series inductance provided by the load pin 107.
(36)
(37) 3. Quadrature Dielectric Traveling Wave Antenna Feeds
(38) In one implementation, phase shift between two feeds changes along with change in a variable dielectric used to implant the main waveguide(s) 102.
(39) Traditionally, to feed a dielectric traveling wave antenna, scatterers or couplers fed in series along the length of a waveguide. For a fixed propagation constant in that waveguide, this fixes the phase difference between the scatterers or couplers, which in turn radiate or couple energy onto another transmission line with that fixed phase difference. In a fixed beam circular polarization traveling wave antenna, this means two quadrature scatterers or couplers are spaced at /4 (where is the propagation frequency). This causes the phase shift between the two polarizations to be orthogonal, or 90 degrees apart.
(40) However, when the propagation constant of a waveguide 102 can be varied, such as in the case of a dielectric traveling wave antenna described herein, this phase shift between the scatterers or couplers 101 varies with the imaginary component of gamma (and velocity of propagation). The impact of this variable phase shift causes the axial ratio of a Circularly Polarized (CP) antenna to degrade because the axial ratio has a term for phase difference in it. Typically, one would space the scatterers or couplers at such a spacing to cause the phase shift to be 90 degrees as the beam is crossing through broadside so 1) axial ratio would be optimum at broadside and 2) the photonic band gap reflection is cancelled within the waveguide.
(41) An alternative to suffering this axial ratio degradation is to feed a quadrature radiating element (one example would be a dual input patch), as pictured in
(42) The two waveguides 102-2, 102-2 can feed a single line of dual polarization, dual input radiators as per
(43) 4. Reflectionless Angle Scanning Series Fed Array
(44) This implementation solves an impedance mismatch when changing transmission line velocity.
(45) As per
(46) The arrangement is motivated by the following factors: (a) High Voltage Staning Wave Ratio (VSWR) on travelling wave antennas scanned near boresight due to admittances adding up when elements separated by half wavelength (/2); (b) characteristic impedance of series feeding transmission line changing as its velocity is changed to steer the array.
(47) Prior approaches had several disadvantages including: (a) VSWR buildup when antenna elements are separated by half wavelength. It is well known that impedance on a line repeats every half wavelength, effectively putting the elements in parallel. When N such impedances are placed in parallel, a high VSWR results. (b) Characteristic impedance (Zo) of feed line changes as its velocity (vp) is changed to steer the beam. Zo and vp are interrelated by Zo=sqrt(L/C) and Vp=1/sqrt(L*C). It is impossible to change C without changing both Zo and vp.
(48) The advantage of the
(49) As a result, the lowered VSWR will increase gain and improve system performance; and decoupled Vp and Zo will improve maximum scan angles for a given change in feedline parameter C.
(50) More particularly, by inserting matched reflection type phase shifter(s) 120 into the line (see
(51) Additionally, the impedance at the junction of each antenna element and the rest of the array can be made to equal 50 ohms by making the parallel combination of the element and feedline impedance 50 ohms. This is done by increasing the feedline impedance by using a quarter wave transformer, or other methods.
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55) 5. Multiple Radiation Modes to Extend Field of Regard in a Traveling Wave Antenna.
(56) The following equation shows the peak radiation scan angle for any traveling wave antenna:
(57)
where:
(58) is the scan angle
(59) is the free space wavelength
(60) S is the line array element spacing
(61) .sub.o is the free space propagation constant
(62) is the adjustable waveguide propagation constant; and
(63) m is the radiation mode
(64) One can thus select multiple m (mode values) and find multiple solutions for theta for a certain range of . For example, in the plot of
(65) There are three radiation modes plotted (m=0, 1, 2) in
(66) This feature becomes useful when trying to achieve very high effective dielectric constants, where the gaps between waveguide laters must become very small. To alleviate this very small gap requirement, as the array is scanned in that direction, operation can switch to the next lowest mode to continue to the Field of Regard (FoR) edge with larger airgaps.
(67) An HFSS (High Frequency Structured Simulator) model simulated this phenomenon and shows that multiple radiation modes can be used to extend the Field of Regard (FoR). See
(68) 6. Progressive Delay Elements
(69) To increase the instantaneous bandwidth of the array, i.e. to maintain the direction of the main beam independent of frequency, progressive delay elements may be embedded in or with the waveguide couplers 101. One possible geometry is shown in
(70) 7. Design Considerations
(71) In addition, there are further possibilities with the phased array antenna(s) described herein
(72) Do not implement any delay or correction. Depending on bandwidth requirements and peak gain beamwidth, the far-field beam direction may only scan over a very small angle across the bandwidth. This beam scanning with frequency causes a slight distortion in the gain over frequency curve, and the severity of that distortion depends on the beamwidth. This method is acceptable up to a 2.5% bandwidth, given the beamwidth is not extremely narrow.
(73) Progressive delays embedded in the line arrays. The progressive delay approach allows equalization of delays and far-field pattern alignment over a 10% bandwidth. A delay element can be inserted between the coupled waveguide and the radiating element. The delay element is designed N times for different delay values, and each one is implemented separately along the line array. The limiting factor in the progressive delay element approach is loss per unit delay. As with the waveguide, loss in the delay element must be kept to a minimum.
(74) Dielectric wedge approach. A dielectric wedge may be placed atop the array, and integrated as part of the radome. The dielectric constant and shape of the wedge performs time delay beamforming for each progressive element. The advantage of the wedge is that it can be implemented in a low loss, high epsilon dielectric, providing a high delay to loss per unit length ratio. For this reason, it can achieve the highest relative bandwidth, >10%.
(75) 8. Waveguide with Adjustable Propagation Constant and Progressive Delays
(76) Conventional traveling wave fed phased arrays are inherently narrow band antennas. The equation governing the beam direction is given by
cos()=beta(waveguide)/beta(free space)m/d
where beta (waveguide) is the propagation constant of the waveguide, beta (freespace) is the propagation constant in air, d is the array spacing, m is the mode number, and is the wavelength. The wavelength term limits the bandwidth.
(77)
(78) An array of antenna elements, here consisting of crossed bow ties 1504, are placed along the length of the top surface of the waveguide 1502. The antenna elements 1504 may each be fed with a quadrature hybrid combiner as for the other embodiments (not shown). The key to the wide band operation is a delay line 1525 embedded in or with each antenna element along the array. The delay line 1525 is a compact helical HE11 mode line using a high dielectric constant material such as titanium dioxide or barium tetratitanate.
(79) As shown in
cos()= beta(waveguide)/beta(freespace)
where beta(waveguide) is the additional delay (plus or minus) added to the waveguide to permit scanning. There are no frequency dependent terms, thus the scanning is wideband.
(80) The additional delay is provided by changing the propagation constant in the waveguide with a gap structure.
(81) 9. 2-D Dielectric Travelling Wave Array Methodology for Implementation of Actuator-Controlled Beam Steering
(82) In a second refinement, a waveguide has plated-through holes provided with a reconfigurable gap structure, with pins positioned in the plated-through holes. The pins allow the structure to slide up and down as the actuator gap changes size.
(83) In order to facilitate beam steering in two dimensions with a 2-D configuration consisting of rows of 1-D traveling wave excited arrays of elements, a 2-D gap structure may utilize layers of dielectric slabs 1602 with rows of periodically spaced plated through holes 1610 and actuator strips 1620 of piezoelectric or electro active material. The rows of plated through holes define side walls of individual waveguide sections 1502. The slab waveguide 1600 arrangement is shown in
(84) Pins 1630 are placed along the actuator strips to:
(85) 1) ensure the alignment of the reconfigurable gaps 1603 as the gap spacing is increased to scan the beam;
(86) 2) add shielding between adjacent rows of 1-D arrays;
(87) 3) provide a DC path for control power to the actuator strips 1620; and
(88) 4) feedback to provide close loop control.
(89) Strips of conducting material can be deposited on both sides of the piezoelectric layers 1620 to enable control voltages to be impressed upon the piezoelectric actuators through the pins 1630. The control voltages can be applied separately to each row or applied to the entire array by connecting the conducing strips together at one end of the structure.
(90)
(91)
(92) 10. 2-D Dielectric Travelling Wave Antennas
(93) In this refinement, 2-D circular and rectangular travelling wave arrays are fed by slab waveguides with multiple layers and actuator controlled gaps to provide high gain hemispherical coverage.
(94) Traveling wave arrays would typically require a separate waveguide to provide excitation to each row of a 2-D traveling wave array. Here, a single waveguide provides an elevation steerable line array of elements with the line arrays configured side-by-side. A separate conventional feed system is used to excite each line array with the proper phase or time delay to provide steerabiility in the azimuthal plane. The elevation steering of the traveling wave line arrays is accomplished by actuator controls gaps in the dielectric to control the propagation constant.
(95) By using a two-dimensional slab waveguide with 2-D gaps controlled by actuators, it is possible to eliminate the need for separate waveguides and to provide high gain hemispherical coverage. The two geometries to be considered are (A) a Cartesian geometry using rectangular slabs and (B) a circularly symmetric geometry using circular slabs.
(96) (A) Cartesian Geometry Case Using Rectangular Slabs
(97) As shown in
(98) The exciting elements 1910 should have beam widths of 90 to guarantee uniform coverage over the azimuthal plane. Mounted on the top surface of the slab waveguide 1600 are so-called scattering elements 1940 which intercept a small amount of the plane wave excitation and reradiate the power. The system thus operates as a leaky wave structure.
(99) The scattering elements 1940, which should exhibit hemispherical patterns, can be circularly polarized crossed dipoles are arranged in a Cartesian grid pattern, as shown.
(100) As in the implementations described above, one can control the propagation constant in the slab using the actuators (not shown in
(101) (B) Circular Symmetry Implementations
(102) The implementations shown in
(103) The flat circular case in
(104) The wedge version shown in