Rare earth reduced garnet systems and related microwave applications
10230146 ยท 2019-03-12
Assignee
Inventors
- David Bowie Cruickshank (Rockville, MD, US)
- Rickard Paul O'DONOVAN (Dunmanway, IE)
- Iain Alexander MacFarlane (Midleton, IE)
- Brian MURRAY (Belgooly, IE)
- Michael David Hill (Frederick, MD, US)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
Disclosed are synthetic garnets and related devices that can be used in radio-frequency (RF) applications. In some embodiments, such RF devices can include garnets having reduced or substantially nil Yttrium or other rare earth metals. Such garnets can be configured to yield high dielectric constants, and ferrite devices, such as TM-mode circulators/isolators, formed from such garnets can benefit from reduced dimensions. Further, reduced or nil rare earth content of such garnets can allow cost-effective fabrication of ferrite-based RF devices. In some embodiments, such ferrite devices can include other desirable properties such as low magnetic resonance linewidths. Examples of fabrication methods and RF-related properties are also disclosed.
Claims
1. A modified garnet structure comprising: a bismuth-doped garnet represented by the formula Bi.sub.3x(Ca).sub.xFe.sub.2y(Me).sub.yFe.sub.3z(Me).sub.zO.sub.12, x being greater than or equal to 1.6 and less than or equal to 2.0, , y being greater than or equal to 0.35 and less than or equal to 0.75, z being greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.525, and each of Me and Me representing a metal element.
2. The modified garnet structure of claim 1 wherein the dielectric constant value is at least 21.
3. The modified garnet structure of claim 1 wherein the dielectric constant value is at least 27.
4. The modified garnet structure of claim 1 wherein the metal element Me includes Zr.
5. The modified garnet structure of claim 1 wherein the metal element Me includes V.
6. The modified garnet structure of claim 1 wherein the bismuth-doped garnet is substantially free of rare earth elements.
7. The modified garnet structure of claim 1 wherein the garnet material has a ferrimagnetic resonance linewidth value that is less than 12 Oersted.
8. A modified garnet structure comprising: a bismuth-doped garnet represented by the formula Bi.sub.1.4Ca.sub.1.6Zr.sub.0.55V.sub.0.525Fe.sub.3.925O.sub.12, the bismuth-doped garnet material having a dielectric constant value of at least 21.
9. The modified garnet structure of claim 8 wherein the bismuth-doped garnet has a dielectric constant value of at least 27.
10. The modified garnet structure of claim 8 wherein the garnet material has a ferrimagnetic resonance linewidth value that is less than 12 Oersted.
11. A radiofrequency system comprising: at least one circulator including a bismuth-doped garnet material represented by the formula Bi.sub.3x(Ca).sub.xFe.sub.2y(Me).sub.yFe.sub.3z(ME).sub.zO.sub.12, x being greater than or equal to 1.6 and less than or equal to 2.0, y being greater than or equal to 0.35 and less than or equal to 0.75, z being greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 0.525, and each of Me and Me representing a metal element.
12. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the circulator is incorporated into an antenna.
13. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the system is a base station.
14. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the bismuth-doped garnet material has a dielectric constant value of at least 21.
15. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the dielectric constant value is at least 27.
16. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the metal element Me includes Zr.
17. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the metal element Me includes V.
18. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the bismuth-doped garnet is substantially free of rare earth elements.
19. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein the garnet material has a ferrimagnetic resonance linewidth value that is less than 12 Oersted.
20. The radiofrequency device of claim 11 wherein garnet material has a composition Bi.sub.1.4Ca.sub.1.6Zr.sub.0.55V.sub.0.525Fe.sub.3.925O.sub.12.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS
(26) The headings provided herein, if any, are for convenience only and do not necessarily affect the scope or meaning of the claimed invention.
(27)
(28) In some embodiments, a material having one or more of the foregoing properties can be implemented in applications (block 10) such as radio-frequency (RF) application. Such applications can include implementations of one or more features as described herein in devices 12. In some applications, such devices can further be implemented in products 11. Examples of such devices and/or products are described herein.
(29) Disclosed herein are methods of modifying synthetic garnet compositions, such as Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG), to reduce or eliminate the use of rare earth metals in such compositions. Also disclosed herein are synthetic garnet materials having reduced or no rare earth metal content, methods of producing the materials, and the devices and systems incorporating such materials. The synthetic garnet materials prepared according to embodiments described in the disclosure exhibit favorable magnetic properties for microwave magnetic applications. These favorable properties include but are limited to low magnetic resonance line width, optimized density, saturation magnetization and dielectric loss tangent. Applicants have surprisingly found that when garnet compositions are doped with certain combinations of ions and prepared using certain processing techniques, a significant amount if not all of the rare earth elements can be substituted and yet still result in microwave magnetic crystalline materials with comparable, if not superior, performance characteristics as commercially available garnets containing Yttrium (Y) or other rare earth elements.
(30) Synthetic garnets typically have the formula unit of A.sub.3B.sub.5O.sub.12, where A and B are trivalent metal ions. Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) is a synthetic garnet having the formula unit of Y.sub.3Fe.sub.5O.sub.12, which includes Yttrium (Y) in the 3+ oxidation state and Iron (Fe) in the 3+ oxidation state. The crystal structure of a YIG formula unit is depicted in
(31) The modified synthetic garnet compositions, in some embodiments, comprise substituting some or all of the Yttrium (Y) in Yttrium Iron Garnets (YIG) with a combination of other ions such that the resulting material maintains desirable magnetic properties for microwave applications. There have been past attempts toward doping YIG with different ions to modify the material properties. Some of these attempts, such as Bismuth (Bi) doped YIG, are described in Microwave Materials for Wireless Applications by D. B. Cruickshank, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. However, in practice ions used as substitutes may not behave predictably because of, for example, spin canting induced by the magnetic ion itself or by the effect of non-magnetic ions on the environment adjacent magnetic ions, reducing the degree alignment. Thus, the resulting magnetic properties cannot be predicted. Additionally, the amount of substitution is limited in some cases. Beyond a certain limit, the ion will not enter its preferred lattice site and either remains on the outside in a second phase compound or leaks into another site. Additionally, ion size and crystallographic orientation preferences may compete at high substitution levels, or substituting ions are influenced by the ion size and coordination of ions on other sites. As such, the assumption that the net magnetic behavior is the sum of independent sub-lattices or single ion anisotropy may not always apply in predicting magnetic properties.
(32) Considerations in selecting an effective substitution of rare earth metals in YIG for microwave magnetic applications include the optimization of the density, the magnetic resonance linewidth, the saturation magnetization, the Curie temperature, and the dielectric loss tangent in the resulting modified crystal structure. Magnetic resonance is derived from spinning electrons, which when excited by an appropriate radio frequency (RF) will show resonance proportional to an applied magnetic field and the frequency. The width of the resonance peak is usually defined at the half power points and is referred to as the magnetic resonance linewidth. It is generally desirable for the material to have a low linewidth because low linewidth manifests itself as low magnetic loss, which is required for all low insertion loss ferrite devices. The modified garnet compositions according to preferred embodiments of the present invention provide single crystal or polycrystalline materials with reduced Yttrium content and yet maintaining low linewidth and other desirable properties for microwave magnetic applications.
(33) In some embodiments, a Yttrium based garnet is modified by substituting Bismuth (Bi.sup.3+) for some of the Yttrium (Y.sup.3+) on the dodecahedral sites of the garnet structure in combination with introducing one or more ions, such as divalent (+2), trivalent (+3), tetravalent (+4), pentavalent (+5) or hexavalent (+6) non-magnetic ions to the octahedral sites of the structure to replace at least some of the Iron (Fe.sup.3+). In a preferred implementation, one or more high valency non-magnetic ions such as Zirconium (Zr.sup.4+) or Niobium (Nb.sup.5+) can be introduced to the octahedral sites.
(34) In some embodiments, a Yttrium based garnet is modified by introducing one or more high valency ions with an oxidation state greater than 3+ to the octahedral or tetrahedral sites of the garnet structure in combination with substituting Calcium (Ca.sup.2+) for Yttrium (Y.sup.3+) in the dodecahedral site of the structure for charge compensation induced by the high valency ions, hence reducing the Y.sup.3+ content. When non-trivalent ions are introduced, valency balance is maintained by introducing, for example, divalent Calcium (Ca.sup.2+) to balance the non-trivalent ions. For example, for each 4+ ion introduced to the octahedral or tetrahedral sites, one Y.sup.3+ ion is substituted with a Ca.sup.2+ ion. For each 5+ ion, two Y.sup.3+ ions are replaced by Ca.sup.2+ ions. For each 6+ ion, three Y.sup.3+ ions are replaced by Ca.sup.2+ ions. For each 6+ ion, three Y.sup.3+ ions are replaced by Ca.sup.2+ ions. In one implementation, one or more high valence ions selected from the group consisting of Zr.sup.4+, Sn.sup.4+, Ti.sup.4+, Nb.sup.5+, Ta.sup.5+, Sb.sup.5+, W.sup.6+, and Mo.sup.6+ is introduced to the octahedral or tetrahedral sites, and divalent Calcium (Ca.sup.2+) is used to balance the charges, which in turn reduces Y.sup.3+ content.
(35) In some embodiments, a Yttrium based garnet is modified by introducing one or more high valency ions, such as Vanadium (V.sup.5+), to the tetrahedral site of the garnet structure to substitute for Fe.sup.3+ to further reduce the magnetic resonance linewidth of the resulting material. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the mechanism of ion substitution causes reduced magnetization of the tetrahedral site of the lattice, which results in higher net magnetization of the garnet, and by changing the magnetocrystalline environment of the ferric ions also reduces anisotropy and hence the ferromagnetic linewidth of the material.
(36) In some embodiments, Applicant has found that a combination of high Bismuth (Bi) doping combined with Vanadium (V) and Zirconium (Zr) induced Calcium (Ca) valency compensation could effectively displace all or most of the Yttrium (Y) in microwave device garnets. Applicants also have found that certain other high valency ions could also be used on the tetrahedral of octahedral sites and that a fairly high level of octahedral substitution in the garnet structure is preferred in order to obtain magnetic resonance linewidth in the 5 to 20 Oersted range. Moreover, Yttrium displacement is preferably accomplished by adding Calcium in addition to Bismuth to the dodecahedral site. Doping the octahedral or tetrahedral sites with higher valency ions, preferably greater than 3+, would allow more Calcium to be introduced to the dodecahedral site to compensate for the charges, which in turn would result in further reduction of Yttrium content.
(37) Modified Synthetic Garnet Compositions:
(38) In one implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by general Formula I: Bi.sub.xCa.sub.y+2xY.sub.1xy2zFe.sub.5yzZr.sub.yV.sub.zO.sub.12, where x=0 to 3, y=0 to 1, and z=0 to 1.5, more preferably x=0.5 to 1.4, y=0.3 to 0.55, and z=0 to 0.6. In a preferred implementation, 0.5 to 1.4 formula units of Bismuth (Bi) is substituted for some of the Yttrium (Y) on the dodecahedral site, 0.3 to 0.55 formula units of Zirconium (Zr) is substituted for some of the Iron (Fe) on the octahedral site. In some embodiments, up to 0.6 formula units of Vanadium (V) is substituted for some of the Iron (Fe) on the tetrahedral site. Charge balance is achieved by Calcium (Ca) substituting for some or all of the remaining Yttrium (Y). In some other embodiments, small amounts of Niobium (Nb) may be placed on the octahedral site and small amounts of Molybdenum (Mo) may be placed on the tetrahedral site.
(39) In another implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by general Formula II: Bi.sub.xY.sub.3x0.35Ca.sub.0.35Zr.sub.0.35Fe.sub.4.65O.sub.12, where x=0.5 to 1.0, preferably x=0.6 to 0.8, more preferably x=0.5. In this implementation, 0.5 to 1.0 formula units of Bismuth (Bi) is substituted for some of the Yttrium (Y) on the dodecahedral site and Zirconium (Zr) is substituted for some of the Iron (Fe) on the octahedral site. Calcium (Ca.sup.2+) is added to the dodecahedral site to replace some of the remaining Y to balance the Zr charges. Bi content can be varied to achieve varying material properties while Zr is held fixed at Zr=0.35.
(40) In another implementation, the modified garnet composition may be represented by general Formula III: Bi(Y,Ca).sub.2Fe.sub.4.2M.sup.I.sub.0.4M.sup.II.sub.0.4O.sub.12, where M.sup.I is the octahedral substitution for Fe and can be selected from one or more of the following elements: In, Zn, Mg, Zr, Sn, Ta, Nb, Fe, Ti, and Sb, where M.sup.II is the tetrahedral substitution for Fe and can be selected from one or more of the following elements: Ga, W, Mo, Ge, V, Si.
(41) In another implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by general Formula IV: Y.sub.2.152xBi.sub.0.5Ca.sub.0.35+2xZr.sub.0.35V.sub.xFe.sub.4.65xO.sub.12, wherein x=0.1 to 0.8. In this implementation, 0.1 to 0.8 formula units of Vanadium (V) is added to the tetrahedral site to substitute for some of the Iron (Fe), and Calcium (Ca) is added to balance the V charges and replace some of the remaining Y while the levels of Bi and Zr remain fixed similar to Formula III.
(42) In another implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by Formula V: Bi.sub.0.9Ca.sub.0.9xY.sub.2.10.9x(Zr.sub.0.7Nb.sub.0.1).sub.xFe.sub.50.8xO.sub.12, wherein x=0.5 to 1.0. In this implementation, the octahedral substitution is made with two high valency ions: Zr.sup.4+ and Nb.sup.5+ with Bi held constant at 0.9.
(43) In another implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by Formula VI: Bi.sub.0.9Ca.sub.0.9+2xY.sub.2.10.92xZr.sub.0.7Nb.sub.0.1V.sub.xFe.sub.4.2xO.sub.12, where V=0-0.6. In this implementation, Vanadium is introduced to the octahedral site in addition to Zr and Nb. When V=0.6, Y is completely replaced.
(44) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Linewidth (Oe) and Curie Temp. ( C.) Data for Bi.sub.0.9Ca.sub.0.9+2xY.sub.2.1-0.9-2x(Zr, Nb).sub.0.8V.sub.xFe .sub.4.2-xO.sub.12 Heat Treatment Heat Heat (Calcined 3 dB Treatment 3 dB 3 dB Treatment 3 dB 3 dB Blend + 3 dB after (Initial before after (Calcined before after Extended before extended Curie Formula Blend) anneal anneal Blend) anneal anneal Milling) anneal anneal Temp V = 0.5 1050 39 25 1030 38 20 1030 38 17 108 V = 0.4 1050 44 27 1030 48 18 1030 42 16 112 V = 0.3 1050 52 32 1030 46 19 1030 48 15 111 V = 0.2 1050 59 43 1030 55 21 1030 62 17 108 V = 0.1 1050 78 62 1030 61 24 1030 55 21 107
(45) In another implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by Formula VI: Bi.sub.1.4Ca.sub.1.052xZr.sub.0.55V.sub.xFe.sub.4.45xO.sub.12, where x=0-0.525. In this implementation, the level of Bi doping is increased while the level of octahedral substitution is decreased. The material formed has higher Curie temperature and low linewidth. The Vanadium (V) content is varied from 0 to 0.525. When V=0.525, the composition is free of Yttrium. The resulting material achieved a linewidth of 20 Oe without subsequently heat treatment.
(46) In another implementation, the modified synthetic garnet composition may be represented by Formula VII: Y.sub.2CaFe.sub.4.4Zr.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.2O.sub.12. In this implementation, high valency ion Molybdenum (Mo) is added to the tetrahedral site to create a single phase crystal. In other implementations, the modified synthetic garnet compositions can be represented by a formula selected from the group consisting of: BiY.sub.2Fe.sub.4.6In.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiCa.sub.0.4Y.sub.1.6Fe.sub.4.6Zr.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiCa.sub.0.4Y.sub.1.6Fe.sub.4.6Ti.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiCa.sub.0.8Y.sub.1.2Fe.sub.4.6Sb.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiY.sub.2Fe.sub.4.6Ga.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiCa.sub.1.2Y.sub.0.8Fe.sub.4.2In.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiY.sub.1.2Ca.sub.0.8Fe.sub.4.2Zn.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiY.sub.1.2Ca.sub.0.8Fe.sub.4.2Mg.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiY.sub.0.4Ca.sub.1.6Fe.sub.4.2Zr.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiY.sub.0.4Ca.sub.1.6Fe.sub.4.2Sn.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiCa.sub.2Fe.sub.4.2Ta.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiCa.sub.2Fe.sub.4.2Nb.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, BiY.sub.0.8Ca.sub.1.2Fe.sub.4.6Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12, and BiY.sub.0.4Ca.sub.1.6Fe.sub.4.2Ti.sub.0.4Mo.sub.0.4O.sub.12.
(47) Preparation of the Modified Synthetic Garnet Compositions:
(48) The preparation of the modified synthetic garnet materials can be accomplished by using known ceramic techniques. A particular example of the process flow is illustrated in
(49) As shown in
(50) After the raw material is weighed, they are blended in Step 108 using methods consistent with the current state of the ceramic art, which can include aqueous blending using a mixing propeller, or aqueous blending using a vibratory mill with steel or zirconia media. In some embodiments, a glycine nitrate or spray pyrolysis technique may be used for blending and simultaneously reacting the raw materials.
(51) The blended oxide is subsequently dried in Step 110, which can be accomplished by pouring the slurry into a pane and drying in an oven, preferably between 100-400 C. or by spray drying, or by other techniques known in the art.
(52) The dried oxide blend is processed through a sieve in Step 112, which homogenizes the powder and breaks up soft agglomerates that may lead to dense particles after calcining.
(53) The material is subsequently processed through a pre-sintering calcining in Step 114. Preferably, the material is loaded into a container such as an alumina or cordierite sagger and heat treated in the range of about 800-1000 C., more preferably about 900-950 C. Preferably, the firing temperature is low as higher firing temperatures have an adverse effect on linewidth.
(54) After calcining, the material is milled in Step 116, preferably in a vibratory mill, an attrition mill, a jet mill or other standard comminution technique to reduce the median particle size into the range of about 0.5 micron to 10 microns. Milling is preferably done in a water based slurry but may also be done in ethyl alcohol or another organic based solvent.
(55) The material is subsequently spray dried in Step 118. During the spray drying process, organic additives such as binders and plasticizers can be added to the slurry using techniques known in the art. The material is spray dried to provide granules amenable to pressing, preferably in the range of about 10 microns to 150 microns in size.
(56) The spray dried granules are subsequently pressed in Step 120, preferably by uniaxial or isostatic pressing to achieve a pressed density to as close to 60% of the x-ray theoretical density as possible. In addition, other known methods such as tape casting, tape calendaring or extrusion may be employed as well to form the unfired body.
(57) The pressed material is subsequently processed through a calcining process in Step 122. Preferably, the pressed material is placed on a setter plate made of material such as alumina which does not readily react with the garnet material. The setter plate is heated in a periodic kiln or a tunnel kiln in air or pressure oxygen in the range of between about 850 C.-100 C. to obtain a dense ceramic compact. Other known treatment techniques such as induction heat may also be used in this step.
(58) The dense ceramic compact is machined in the Step 124 to achieve dimensions suitable or the particular applications.
(59) Radio-frequency (RF) applications that utilize synthetic garnet compositions can include ferrite devices having relatively low magnetic resonance linewidths (e.g., approximately 11 Oe or less) as described in reference to FIGS. 2-8. RF applications can also include devices, methods, and/or systems having or related to garnet compositions having reduced or substantially nil reduced earth content. As described herein, such garnet compositions can be configured to yield relatively high dielectric constants; and such a feature can be utilized to provide advantageous functionalities. It will be understood that at least some of the compositions, devices, and methods described in reference to
(60)
(61) Some design considerations for achieving such features are now described. Also described are example devices and related RF performance comparisons. Also described are example applications of such devices, as well as fabrication examples.
(62) Rare Earth Garnets:
(63) Garnet systems in commercial use typically belong to a series of compositions that can be expressed as Y.sub.3x(RE or Ca).sub.xFe.sub.2y(Me).sub.yFe.sub.3z(Me).sub.zO.sub.12, where RE represents a non-Y rare earth element. The non-Y rare earth element (RE) can be, for example, Gd for temperature compensation of magnetization, with small amounts of Ho sometimes used for high power doping purposes. Rare earths are typically trivalent and occupy dodecahedral sites. Me in octahedral sites is typically non-magnetic (e.g., typically Zr.sup.+4, although In.sup.+3 or Sn.sup.+4 can been used, typically at around y=0.4 in the formula). Me' in tetrahedral sites is typically non-magnetic (e.g., typically Al.sup.+3 or V.sup.+5, where z can vary from 0 to around 1 in the formula to give a range of magnetizations). Ca.sup.+2 is typically used in dodecahedral sites for valency compensation when the octahedral or tetrahedral substitution is an ion of valency>3. Based on the foregoing, one can see that such commercial garnet systems contain greater than 40% Y or other RE elements, with the balance mainly Fe.sup.+3 on octahedral and tetrahedral sites.
(64) Ferrite Device Design Considerations:
(65) Magnetization (4M.sub.s) of ferrite devices for RF applications such as cellular infrastructure typically operate at 400 MHz to 3 GHz in an above-resonance mode. To achieve typical bandwidths of about 5 to 15%, magnetizations in a range of approximately 1,000 to 2,000 Gauss (approximately 0.1 to 0.2 Tesla) are desired.
(66) Magnetic losses associated with ferrite devices can be determined by a ferrimagnetic resonance linewidth H.sub.o. Values for such linewidth are typically less than about 30 Oersted (about 0.377 Ampere-turns/meter), and are typically equivalent to K.sub.1/M.sub.s, where K.sub.1 is a first order magnetocrystalline anisotropy, determined by the anisotropy of the Fe.sup.+3 ion in two of its sites if non-magnetic Y is the only RE. There can also be a fractional porosity (p) contribution to linewidth, approximately 4M.sub.sp.
(67) Dielectric losses associated with ferrite devices are typically selected so that loss tangent satisfies a condition tan <0.0004. The Curie temperature associated with ferrite devices can be expected to exceed approximately 160 C. for the above range of magnetizations.
(68) Bismuth Garnets:
(69) Single crystal materials with a formula Bi.sub.(32x)Ca.sub.2xFe.sub.5xV.sub.xO.sub.12 have been grown in the past, where x was 1.25. A 4M.sub.s value of about 600 Gauss was obtained (which is suitable for some tunable filters and resonators in a 1-2 GHz range), with linewidths of about 1 Oersted, indicating low intrinsic magnetic losses for the system. However, the level of Bi substitution was only about 0.5 in the formula.
(70) Attempts to make single phase polycrystalline materials (with a formula Bi.sub.32xCa.sub.2xV.sub.xFe.sub.5xO.sub.12) similar to the single crystal materials were successful only in a region of x>0.96, effectively confining the 4M.sub.s to less than about 700 Oersted and resulting in poor linewidths (greater than 100 Oersted). Small amounts of Al.sup.+3 reduced the linewidth to about 75 Oersted, but increased Al.sup.+3 reduced 4M.sub.s. Bi substitution was only about 0.4 in the formula for these materials.
(71) For Faraday rotation devices, the Faraday rotation can be essentially proportionate to the level of Bi substitution in garnets, raising interest in increasing the level of substitution. Anisotropy is generally not a major factor for optical applications, so substitution on the octahedral and tetrahedral site can be based on maximizing the rotation. Thus, in such applications, it may be desirable to introduce as much Bi.sup.+3 into the dodecahedral site as possible. The maximum level of Bi.sup.+3 can be influenced by the size of the dodecahedral rare earth trivalent ion, and can vary between 1.2 and 1.8 in the formula.
(72) In some situations, the level of Bi.sup.+3 substitution can be affected by substitutions on the other sites. Because Bi.sup.+3 is non-magnetic, it can influence the Faraday rotation through its effect on the tetrahedral and octahedral Fe.sup.+3 ions. Since this is thought to be a spin-orbital interaction, where Bi.sup.+3 modifies existing Fe.sup.+3 pair transitions, one can expect both a change in the anisotropy of the Fe.sup.+3 ions and optical effects including large Faraday rotation. The Curie temperature of Bi.sup.+3 substituted YIG can also increase at low Bi.sup.+3 substitution.
(73) Bi Substitution in Polycrystalline Garnets:
(74) To see the effects (e.g., low magnetocrystalline anisotropy and hence low magnetic losses) that can result from combinations of Bi.sup.+3 on the dodecahedral site and Zr.sup.+4 on the octahedral site, following approaches were tested. The first example configuration included fixed Bi and variable Zr in a formula Bi.sub.0.5Y.sub.2.5xCa.sub.xZr.sub.xFe.sub.5xO.sub.12, where x varied from approximately 0 to 0.35. The second example configuration included fixed Zr and variable Bi in a formula Bi.sub.xY.sub.2.65xCa.sub.0.35Zr.sub.0.35Fe.sub.4.65O.sub.12, where x varied from approximately 0.5 to 1.4.
(75)
(76) One can also see, as found in Bi-free garnet, that the introduction of increasing amounts of Zr.sup.+4 progressively lowers the anisotropy contribution, and very low linewidths are found at Zr=0.35, albeit with some reduction in Curie temperature. The expected result is a higher Curie temperature from the Bi content being offset by the Zr contribution.
(77) As further shown in
(78)
(79) It appeared that the maximum Bi.sup.+3 content was 1.4 in the formula, and therefore can be a optimum or desired amount to replace Y.sup.+3, at least in the range of Zr.sup.+4 substitution examined. At the example desired Bi content of 1.4, there was a desire to optimize the Zr.sup.+4 content to reduce or minimize the linewidth without substantially reducing the Curie temperature. Also considered was a possibility of implementing a range of V.sup.+5 substitutions which can yield a range of magnetizations without much reduction in Curie temperature (e.g., as found in Y-based Zr or In CaV garnets).
(80) Based at least in part on the foregoing, the following substitutions were tested to optimize or improve Bi-substituted garnet compositions. For example, by using Ca.sup.+2 to balance V.sup.+5, more Y could be displaced, at a rate of 2 Ca.sup.+2 for 1 V.sup.+5. In another example, Zr.sup.+4 can yield 1:1 substitution of Ca.sup.+2 for Y; thus, if Nb.sup.+5 could be used instead on the octahedral site, more Y could be removed from the compositions.
(81)
(82)
(83) In the context of RF applications, following observations can be made for the foregoing example rare earth-free composition (Bi.sub.1.4Ca.sub.1.6Zr.sub.0.55V.sub.0.525Fe.sub.3.925O.sub.12). Dielectric constant is approximately 27; and this is thought to be due to the lone pair of electrons on Bi.sup.+3 which can greatly increase the polarizability of the ion. Dielectric loss is less than 0.0004, which is useful for most applications. Magnetic loss (as linewidth) is approximately 11 Oersted, which is comparable with the best Y based garnets. 4M.sub.s is approximately 1150 Gauss, which is useful for many RF devices such as those used in cellular infrastructures. Curie temperature is approximately 160 C., which is useful for most applications.
(84) Examples of Devices Having Rare Earth Free or Reduced Garnets:
(85) As described herein, garnets having reduced or no rare earth content can be formed, and such garnets can have desirable properties for use in devices for applications such as RF applications. In some implementations, such devices can be configured to take advantage of unique properties of the Bi.sup.+3 ion.
(86) For example, the lone pair of electrons on the Bi.sup.+3 ion can raise the ionic polarizability and hence the dielectric constant. This is consistent with the measurement observed in reference to
(87) For example, because the center frequency of a ferrite device (such as a garnet disk) operating in a split polarization transverse magnetic (TM) mode is proportional to 1/().sup.1/2, doubling the dielectric constant () can reduce the frequency by a factor of square root of 2 (approximately 1.414). As described herein in greater detail, increasing the dielectric constant by, for example, a factor of 2, can result in a reduction in a lateral dimension (e.g., diameter) of a ferrite disk by factor of square root of 2. Accordingly, the ferrite disk's area can be reduced by a factor of 2. Such a reduction in size can be advantageous since the device's footprint area on an RF circuit board can be reduced (e.g., by a factor of 2 when the dielectric constant is increased by a factor of 2). Although described in the context of the example increase by a factor of 2, similar advantages can be realized in configurations involving factors that are more or less than 2.
(88) Reduced Size Circulators/Isolators Having Ferrite with High Dielectric Constant:
(89) As described herein, ferrite devices having garnets with reduced or no rare earth content can be configured to include a high dielectric constant property. Various design considerations concerning dielectric constants as applied to RF applications are now described. In some implementations, such designs utilizing garnets with high dielectric constants may or may not necessarily involve rare earth free configurations.
(90) Values of dielectric constant for microwave ferrite garnets and spinels commonly fall in a range of 12 to 18 for dense polycrystalline ceramic materials. Such garnets are typically used for above ferromagnetic resonance applications in, for example, UHF and low microwave region, because of their low resonance linewidth. Such spinels are typically used at, for example, medium to high microwave frequencies, for below resonance applications, because of their higher magnetization. Most, if not substantially all, circulators or isolators that use such ferrite devices are designed with triplate/stripline or waveguide structures.
(91) Dielectric constant values for low linewidth garnets is typically in a range of 14 to 16. These materials can be based on Yttrium iron garnet (YIG) with a value of approximately 16, or substituted versions of that chemistry with Aluminum or, for example, Zirconium/Vanadium combinations which can reduce the value to around 14. Although for example Lithium Titanium based spinel ferrites exist with dielectric constants up to close to 20, these generally do not have narrow linewidths; and thus are not suitable for many RF applications.
(92) As described herein, garnets made using Bismuth substituted for Yttrium can have much higher dielectric constants. Also as described herein, when Zirconium is used in tandem with Bismuth substitution to maintain low linewidths, then the dielectric constant of the garnet can increase as shown by way of examples in Table 2.
(93) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Den- Dielectric 4M.sub.s Linewidth sity Composition Constant (Gauss) (Oersted) (g/cc) Bi.sub.0.5Ca.sub.0.35Y.sub.2.15Zr.sub.0.35Fe.sub.4.65O.sub.12 18.93 1985 25 5.485 Bi.sub.0.9Ca.sub.0.35Y.sub.1.75Zr.sub.0.35Fe.sub.4.65O.sub.12 21.35 1925 67 5.806 Bi.sub.1.4Ca.sub.0.35Y.sub.1.25Zr.sub.0.35Fe.sub.4.65O.sub.12 31.15 1857 52 6.041
(94) Table 2 shows that it is possible to more than double the dielectric constant of garnets. In some implementations, an increase in dielectric constant can be maintained for compositions containing Bismuth, including those with other non-magnetic substitution on either or both of the octahedral and tetrahedral sites (e.g., Zirconium or Vanadium, respectively). By using ions of higher polarization, it is possible to further increase the dielectric constant. For example, Niobium or Titanium can be substituted into the octahedral or tetrahedral site; and Titanium can potentially enter both sites.
(95) In some implementations, a relationship between ferrite device size, dielectric constant, and operating frequency can be represented as follows. There are different equations that can characterize different transmission line representations. For example, in above-resonance stripline configurations, the radius R of a ferrite disk can be characterized as
R=1.84/[2(effective permeability)(dielectric constant)].sup.1/2(1)
where (effective permeability)=H.sub.dc+4M.sub.s/H.sub.dc, with H.sub.dc being the magnetic field bias. Equation 1 shows that, for a fixed frequency and magnetic bias, the radius R is inversely proportional to the square root of the dielectric constant.
(96) In another example, in below-resonance stripline configurations, a relationship for ferrite disk radius R similar to Equation 1 can be utilized for weakly coupled quarter wave circulators where the low bias field corresponds to below-resonance operation. For below-resonance waveguide configurations (e.g., in disk or rod waveguides), both lateral dimension (e.g., radius R) and thickness d of the ferrite can influence the frequency. However, the radius R can still be expressed as
R=/[2(dielectric constant).sup.1/2][((R)/(2d)).sup.2+(1.84).sup.2].sup.1/2,(2)
which is similar to Equation 1 in terms of relationship between R and dielectric constant.
(97) The example relationship of Equation 2 is in the context of a circular disk shaped ferrites. For a triangular shaped resonator, the same waveguide expression can used, but in this case, A (altitude of the triangle) being equal to 3.63/2 applies instead of the radius in the circular disk case.
(98) In all of the foregoing example cases, one can see that by increasing the dielectric constant (e.g., by a factor of 2), one can expect to reduce the size of the ferrite (e.g., circular disk or triangle) by a factor of square root of 2, and thereby reduce the area of the ferrite by a factor of 2. As described in reference to Equation 2, thickness of the ferrite can also be reduced.
(99) In implementations where ferrite devices are used as RF devices, sizes of such RF devices can also be reduced. For example, in a stripline device, a footprint area of the device can be dominated by the area of the ferrite being used. Thus, one can expect that a corresponding reduction in device size would be achieved. In a waveguide device, a diameter of the ferrite being used can be a limiting factor in determining size. However, a reduction provided for the ferrite diameter may be offset by the need to retain waveguide-related dimensions in the metal part of the junction.
(100) Examples of Reduced-Size Ferrite Having Yttrium Free Garnet:
(101) As described herein, ferrite size can be reduced significantly by increasing the dielectric constant associated with garnet structures. Also as described herein, garnets with reduced Yttrium and/or reduced non-Y rare earth content can be formed by appropriate Bismuth substitutions. In some embodiments, such garnets can include Yttrium-free or rare earth free garnets. An example RF device having ferrite devices with increased dielectric constant and Yttrium-free garnets is described in reference to
(102)
(103) As described herein and shown in
(104) Although described in the context of example circular and triangle shaped ferrites, one or more features of the present disclosure can also be implemented in other shaped ferrites.
(105) To demonstrate the foregoing effect of the dielectric constant on the operating frequency (and size in some implementations), circulator (sometimes also referred to as an isolator) devices were built. One circulator was built with a current ferrite available as TransTech TTVG1200 (17.56 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness). Another circulator was built with a Yttrium free ferrite with the same dimensions. For the purpose of description, such a Yttrium free ferrite is referred to as TTHiE1200. Each of the two example circulators has a diameter of about 25 mm.
(106) The TTVG1200 ferrite has a Yttrium Calcium Zirconium Vanadium Iron garnet configuration, and a typical dielectric constant of approximately 14.4. The Yttrium free ferrite (TTHiE1200) has a Bismuth Calcium Zirconium Vanadium Iron garnet configuration containing not more than approximately 1% rare earth oxides, and a dielectric constant of approximately 26.73.
(107) Additional details concerning the foregoing example circulators are described in reference to
(108)
(109) In the example shown, the first ferrite disk 302 is shown to be mounted to an underside of a first ground plane 304. An upper side of the first ground plane 304 is shown to define a recess dimensioned to receive and hold the first magnet 306. Similarly, the second ferrite disk 312 is shown to be mounted to an upper side of a second ground plane 314; and an underside of the second ground plane 314 is shown to define a recess dimensioned to receive and hold the second magnet 316.
(110) The magnets 306, 316 arranged in the foregoing manner can yield generally axial field lines through the ferrite disks 302, 312. The magnetic field flux that passes through the ferrite disks 302, 312 can complete its circuit through return paths provided by 320, 318, 308 and 310 so as to strengthen the field applied to the ferrite disks 302, 312. In some embodiments, the return path portions 320 and 310 can be disks having a diameter larger than that of the magnets 316, 306; and the return path portions 318 and 308 can be hollow cylinders having an inner diameter that generally matches the diameter of the return path disks 320, 310. The foregoing parts of the return path can be formed as a single piece or be an assembly of a plurality of pieces.
(111) The example circulator device 300 can further include an inner flux conductor (also referred to herein as a center conductor) 322 disposed between the two ferrite disks 302, 312. Such an inner conductor can be configured to function as a resonator and matching networks to the ports (not shown).
(112)
(113) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Marker Trace Frequency Loss value 1 Insertion loss (Y-free TTHiE1200) 1.77 GHz 0.40 dB 2 Insertion loss (Y-free TTHiE1200) 2.23 GHz 0.39 dB 3 Insertion loss (TTVG1200) 2.41 GHz 0.39 dB 4 Insertion loss (TTVG1200) 3.01 GHz 0.41 dB 5 Return loss (Y-free TTHiE1200) 1.77 GHz 19.87 dB 6 Return loss (Y-free TTHiE1200) 2.23 GHz 16.64 dB 7 Return loss (TTVG1200) 2.41 GHz 16.37 dB 8 Return loss (TTVG1200) 3.01 GHz 18.75 dB
(114) Based on the foregoing measurements, one can see that the TTVG1200 configuration has a center operating frequency of about 2.7 GHz, and the TTHiE1200 configuration has a center operating frequency of about 2.0 GHz. The ratio of center operating frequencies between TTHiE1200 and TTVG1200 configurations is approximately 0.74. It is noted that a theoretical reduction in frequency due to a higher dielectric constant can be calculated (e.g., using Bosma's equations) as being proportional to square root of the ratios of the dielectric constants. Thus, such a calculation yields sqrt(14.4/26.73)=0.734, which is in good agreement with the measured reduction of 0.74.
(115) For the example 25 mm circulators having the TTHiE1200 and TTVG1200 configurations, a comparison of intermodulation yields the following measurements. For 240 W tones at room temperature, the TTVG1200 configuration yields an intermodulation performance of approximately 78 dBc at 2.7 GHz, and the TTHiE1200 configuration yields an intermodulation performance of approximately 70 dBc at 1.8 GHz. It is noted that such results are expected due to the reduction in the biasing magnetic field.
(116) To further characterize the TTHiE1200 ferrite as described herein, a smaller 10 mm circulator was made using a TTHiE1200 ferrite disk (radius of approximately 7.00 mm, thickness of approximately 0.76 mm).
(117) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Intermodulation Parameter (dBc) 2 15 W @ 2110 & 2115 MHz, 59.9 3.sup.rd Order IMD @ 2105 MHz 2 15 W @ 2110 & 2115 MHz, 58.8 3.sup.rd Order IMD @ 2120 MHz 2 15 W @ 2138 & 2143 MHz, 57.5 3.sup.rd Order IMD @ 2133 MHz 2 15 W @ 2138 & 2143 MHz, 56.7 3.sup.rd Order IMD @ 2148 MHz 2 15 W @ 2165 & 2170 MHz, 56.0 3.sup.rd Order IMD @ 2160 MHz 2 15 W @ 2165 & 2170 MHz, 54.9 3.sup.rd Order IMD @ 2175 MHz
(118) Based on
(119) Various examples of new garnet systems and devices related thereto are described herein. In some embodiments, such garnet systems can contain high levels of Bismuth, which can allow formation of low loss ferrite devices. Further, by selected addition of other elements, one can reduce or eliminate rare earth content of garnets, including commercial garnets. Reduction or elimination of such rare earth content can include, but is not limited to, Yttrium. In some embodiments, the garnet systems described herein can be configured to significantly increase (e.g., double) the dielectric constant of non-Bi garnets, thereby offering the possibility of significantly decreasing (e.g., halving) the printed circuit footprint of ferrite devices associated with conventional garnets.
(120) In some implementations as described herein, a synthetic garnet material can include a structure having dodecahedral sites, with Bismuth occupying at least some of the dodecahedral sites. In some embodiments, such a garnet material can have a dielectric constant value of at least 18.0, 19.0, 20.0, 21.0, 22.0, 23.0, 24.0, 25.0, 26.0, or 27.0.
(121) In some embodiments, ferrite-based circulator devices having one or more features as described herein can be implemented as a packaged modular device.
(122) In some embodiments, a packaged circulator/isolator such as the example of
(123) In some embodiments, the foregoing example circuit board can include RF circuits associated with a front-end module of an RF apparatus. As shown in
(124) In some embodiments, circuits and devices having one or more features as described herein can be implemented in RF applications such as a wireless base-station. Such a wireless base-station can include one or more antennas 412, such as the example described in reference to
(125) As described herein, terms circulator and isolator can be used interchangeably or separately, depending on applications as generally understood. For example, circulators can be passive devices utilized in RF applications to selectively route RF signals between an antenna, a transmitter, and a receiver. If a signal is being routed between the transmitter and the antenna, the receiver preferably should be isolated. Accordingly, such a circulator is sometimes also referred to as an isolator; and such an isolating performance can represent the performance of the circulator.
(126)
(127) In implementations where the finished ceramic object is part of a device, the device can be assembled in block 25. In implementations where the device or the finished ceramic object is part of a product, the product can be assembled in block 26.
(128)
(129) In some implementations, the powder preparation step (block 21) of
(130) In some implementations, powder prepared as described herein can be formed into different shapes by different forming techniques. By way of examples,
(131) In some implementations, formed objects fabricated as described herein can be sintered to yield desirable physical properties as ceramic devices.
(132) In block 73, heat can be applied to the formed objects so as to yield sintered objects. Such application of heat can be achieved by use of a kiln. In block 74, the sintered objects can be removed from the kiln. In
(133) In block 75, the sintered objects can be cooled. Such cooling can be based on a desired time and temperature profile. In block 206, the cooled objects can undergo one or more finishing operations. In block 207, one or more tests can be performed.
(134) Heat treatment of various forms of powder and various forms of shaped objects are described herein as calcining, firing, annealing, and/or sintering. It will be understood that such terms may be used interchangeably in some appropriate situations, in context-specific manners, or some combination thereof.
(135) Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words comprise, comprising, and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of including, but not limited to. The word coupled, as generally used herein, refers to two or more elements that may be either directly connected, or connected by way of one or more intermediate elements. Additionally, the words herein, above, below, and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word or in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
(136) The above detailed description of embodiments of the invention is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times.
(137) The teachings of the invention provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
(138) While certain embodiments of the inventions have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the disclosure.