System for optimizing air balance and excess air for a combustion process

Abstract

A control system for adjusting total air flow or oxygen in flue gas for a fossil fired power generating or steam generating unit, that includes a plurality of sensors that supply data to a tunable controller adapted to sense total air flow and/or oxygen flow; with the sensors also supplying data relating to carbon monoxide (CO) and/or combustibles and/or loss of ignition (LOI) and/or carbon in ash (CIA), and where the tunable controller can set a desired target or target range for at least one of CO, combustibles, CIA, or LOI and adjust the total air flow and/or O2 via direct control or bias signals. The system can respond to discrete events, analog events and/or thresholds.

Claims

1. A control system for adjusting total air flow or oxygen (O2) in flue gas for a fossil fired power generating or steam generating unit, comprising: a plurality of sensors located in the flue gas coupled to a tunable controller adapted to read at least one of the sensors in order to measure total air flow and/or oxygen flow in the flue gas; at least one of said plurality of sensors also measuring levels of carbon monoxide (CO) and/or combustibles and/or loss of ignition (LOI) and/or carbon in ash (CIA) in the flue gas; the tunable controller adapted to set a desired target or target range for at least one of CO, or combustibles, CIA, in the flue gas, the tunable controller using an O2 balance manager, O2 fuzzy controller and O2 bump controller; the tunable controller comprising: said O2 bump controller that causes an increase in O2 bias by a predetermined amount triggered by periods of high CO or CIA followed after a predetermined duration by a decrease in O2 bias, wherein the decrease is less than the increase; and said O2 fuzzy controller which trims O2 bias in response to an average CO value; said O2 fuzzy controller keeping O2 in a desired range and only adjusting O2 bias when O2 is outside the range; the O2 fuzzy controller making adjustments in increasingly larger increments as deviation from the desired range increases; and said O2 balance manager adapted to manage air distribution through movement of air dampers; wherein, the O2 balance manager directly moves one or more dampers based on input values for O2, CO, combustibles from one or more of the sensors; wherein, said tunable controller means adjusts the total air flow and/or O2 via direct control or bias signals and, wherein the tunable controller is configured to respond to a discrete event comprising a mill, sootblower or burner going into or out of service as sensed through a digital signal; and, wherein the controller adapted to simultaneously compute a balance between O2, CO, air damper settings and windbox differential pressure; and, wherein the O2 balance manager, O2 fuzzy controller, and O2 bump controller operate-independently from one-another; and, wherein the tunable controller is configured to alter the air balance in order to balance combustion indication terms by directly altering air flow at any entry point into a combustion and post combustion zone either through constraints sent to a model/optimization system or by direct biasing or control of output values based on imbalance functions.

2. A control system according to claim 1 wherein the tunable controller means is configured to respond to a discrete event comprising a mill, sootblower or burner going into or out of service as sensed by the controller through an analog inferential signal converted to digital value.

3. A control system according to claim 1 wherein the tunable controller means is configured to respond to a discrete event comprising a mill, sootblower or burner going into or out of service based on threshold values.

4. A control system according to claim 1 wherein the tunable controller means is configured to respond to a discrete event comprising an alarm event for O2 average, and/or O2 individual sensors, high combustible signal and/or high CO, and/or high CIA or LOI.

5. A control system according to claim 1 wherein the tunable controller means is configured to respond to a discrete event comprising a sootblowing operation.

6. A control system according to claim 1 wherein the tunable controller means is configured to respond to discrete events over a discrete a period of time with a tunable bump up and bump down value and time period for controlling O2 or excess air.

7. The control system of claim 1 where the system is virtual and can be reconfigured to add and delete features without need to for compiling, assembling or restart of computers or controllers.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) Attention is now directed to several figures that illustrate features of the present invention:

(2) FIG. 1 shows a flowchart for the present invention with an O2 disturbance model.

(3) FIG. 2 shows the flowchart of FIG. 1 with a direct bias calculation based on O2, CO, combustibles and LOI).

(4) FIG. 3 shows the flowchart of FIG. 1 with an O2 disturbance and direct bias.

(5) Several drawings and illustrations have been presented to aid in understanding the present invention. The scope of the present invention is not limited to what is shown in the figures.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(6) In the prior art, a model and/or optimizer is typically used to set the O2 value. In the present invention, the O2 value, in particular, the O2 grid (2 or more sensors) in combination with the one or more sensor values indicating incomplete combustion are used to dynamically modify the constraints of said system. The O2 is treated as a disturbance variable and not a control variable.

(7) The present invention can also bypass any modeloptimizer combination directly and adjust any number and any combination of air dampers to achieve either a target O2 value or target difference between O2 probes, and/or probes indicating incomplete combustion. In this invention, the feedback adjusts the constraints of the model-optimizer such that other variables such as air dampers are constrained to a new range of operation.

(8) Finally, unique is the ability to use discrete events and merge this with the above control strategies, including, but not limited to: a) A pulverizer mill going into or out of service, as indicated by a DCS digital signal, or through conversion of an analog into a discrete signal (IF mill speed<35:Mill=OFF). b) A sootblower starting and/or stopping. c) An O2 or CEMS signal (e.g. CO, combustibles, LOI) that has an alarm or other discrete trigger in the DCS, or through conversion of an analog into a discrete signal (i.e. O2 probe A2<1.7%, low O2 alarm).

(9) Any of these events can cause a response of bumping the O2 control signal or bias by a discrete amount, for example 0.2%. Usually after a time period, set by the user to approximate the duration of the process upset, the O2 is bumped down, usually at a value less than the bump up, for example 0.1% in this case.

(10) They would all work in combination with a fuzzy controller, that continually looks at an indication incomplete combustion, such as CO and will trim the O2 controller either directly or through a bias to keep CO in a control range. For example, if the CO is desired to be less than 150 ppm for compliance purposes, the user may set the controller to keep CO between 50 and 150 ppm. Therefore if the CO drops below 50 ppm, the bias will become more negative. If the CO is above 150 ppm, the bias becomes more positive. In both cases, the further away from the target value, the bias movement may be increased.

(11) The O2 balance manager, O2 fuzzy controller, and O2 bump controller may operate on independent frequencies. The O2 fuzzy controller and O2 bump controller will work on an additive basis, such that the O2 bump controller may cause a bump in O2 value, which if too much, results in a low CO, triggering to the fuzzy controller to slowly ramp the O2 signal back down. The O2 balance manager, through eliminated pockets of low O2, generally lowers the CO, resulting in the fuzzy controller being able to lower the O2. This may operate with or without a neural network model and optimizer combination.

(12) All this is embedded in a graphical programming environment (GPE) so each controller is virtual (software only) and easily tuned in real-time. The output is connected to the DCS for the normal PID O2 control response.

(13) O2 Control in the present invention is a combination of artificial intelligence (AI) and conventional control techniques. Users may set up the system to utilize one or more of the techniques, with the most common setup for the invention being to utilize the O2 Fuzzy Controller to control the baseline O2 level (generally through the bias), the O2 Bump Controller to respond to discrete events and/or an O2 Balance Manager (a.k.a. Controller) that impacts damper settings either directly and/or through updated constraints to model/optimizer combination to reduce O2 splits (i.e. deviations between probes, furnace sides, furnace O2 average values, or other grid elements measuring O2).

(14) The O2 Bump Controller allows the O2 bias to respond to events and anticipate the need to increase O2 and avoid or trim periods of high CO, combustibles or other poor combustion conditions.

(15) The O2 Fuzzy Controller which is a trim to the O2 bias in response to combustion conditionsnormally an average CO value.

(16) The controller keeps the O2 in the desired range, only adjusting when outside the range; and generally making adjustments in increasingly larger increments as the deviation from desired conditions increases.

(17) The O2 Balance Manager (a.k.a. Controller) works to manage air distribution through movement or constraints on movements of air dampers, such as, auxiliary air, fuel air and/or over-fire/under-fire air. The balancer may directly move a damper based on input values for O2, CO, combustibles or other combustion indicators or it may alter constraints to a model/optimizer logic circuit allowing other targets such as NOx (nitrogen oxides) to be optimized within the new constraint ranges.

(18) All the above controllers are programmed through an Open System Toolkit, requiring no programming, compiling, assembly or other traditional software methods for executing code on a computing device. The Graphical User Interface allows all programming steps, data display, data import/export and communication to happen through graphical elements.

(19) Several descriptions and illustrations have been provided to aid in understanding the present invention. On with skill in the art will realize that numerous changes and variations may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Each of these changes and variations is within the scope of the present invention.