Drill
10213844 ยท 2019-02-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B23B2251/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23B2251/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23B2251/406
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
The drill (1) is provided with a drill body (2) having a rotation center axis (O), two cutting edges (3) provided on the tip side of the drill body (2), and chip evacuation flutes (10) provided behind the two cutting edges (3) in the direction of rotation of the drill (1) from the two cutting edges, the drill tip angle () being from 170 to 190, the web thickness (d) being from 0.10 to 0.25 times the drill diameter (D), the opening angle () of the chip evacuation flutes (10) being from 85 to 110, and the drill (1) comprising a curve having a radius of curvature that gradually decreases from the cutting edge side wall surface (14) to the heel side wall surface (15) of the chip evacuation flutes (10) in a cross-section at a position where the chip evacuation flutes (10) are present.
Claims
1. A drill, comprising: a drill body comprising a rotation center axis; two cutting edges provided on a tip side of the drill body; a chip evacuation flute provided to a rear of the two cutting edges and in a drill rotational direction from each of the two cutting edges; and two heels provided in a drill counter rotation direction from the two cutting edges; in a cross-section orthogonal to the rotation center axis at a position axially rearward of the cutting edge where the chip evacuation flute is present, a radius of curvature of the chip evacuation flute continuously becoming smaller from a first outer peripheral end of a cutting edge side wall surface at a position on a cutting edge side to a second outer peripheral end of a heel side wall surface at a position on a heel side.
2. The drill according to claim 1, wherein the cutting edge side wall surface has a concavity in the counter rotational direction with respect to a straight line connecting the first outer peripheral end and the rotation center axis, and the maximum concavity depth of the cutting edge side wall face is from 0.01 to 0.04 times the drill diameter, the heel side wall surface has a concavity in the rotational direction with respect to a straight line connecting the second outer peripheral end and the rotation center axis, and the maximum concavity depth of the heel side wall surface is from 0.05 to 0.10 times the drill diameter.
3. The drill according to claim 1, wherein the radius of curvature at a flute bottom of the chip evacuation flute is from 0.56 to 0.9 times the drill diameter.
4. The drill according to claim 1, wherein a first gash is provided at an end in the counter rotational direction of each of the two heels; in a circle with the rotation center axis as center when viewed from the tip side, a central ridge portion that is sandwiched between the two first gashes is disposed including the center; and a ratio (L/D) of a length (L) of the central ridge portion to the drill diameter (D) is from 0.15 to 0.25, and, when viewed from the side a central ridge portion tip angle toward the center of the central ridge portion is from 170 to 190.
5. The drill according to claim 4, wherein a ratio (W/L) of a width (W) of the central ridge portion to the length of the central ridge portion (L) is from 0.15 to 0.40.
6. The drill according to claim 5, wherein when viewed from the tip side, the cutting edge comprises a depression in the counter rotation direction, and a height (H) of the depression of the cutting edge is not greater than the width (W) of the central ridge portion.
7. The drill according to claim 1, wherein the drill diameter (D) is not more than 3 mm.
8. The drill according to claim 1, wherein a first gash is provided at an end in the counter rotational direction of each of the two heels and a second gash is provided on the outer peripheral side of the cutting edge.
9. The drill according to claim 1, wherein a first gash is provided at an end in the counter rotational direction of each of the two heels and a ratio (a/D) of a distance (a) from the cutting edge to a terminating end of the first gash to the drill diameter (D) is from 0.3 to 0.5.
10. A drill, comprising: a body having a rotational axis at a center thereof in a cross section that is perpendicular to the rotational axis, and comprising: a front tip; a rear end; a boundary between the front tip and the rear end; and a side surface between the front tip and the boundary; and a flute in spiral at the side surface, the drill further comprising, in the cross section at the side surface positioned axially rearward of the front tip, a boundary line between the body and the flute, the boundary line comprising: a first end at a first intersection of the side surface, having a first curvature radius; a second end at a second intersection of the side surface, having a second curvature radius; and a middle point between the first end and the second end, having a third curvature radius, wherein the first curvature radius is larger than the third curvature radius, and the third curvature radius is larger than the second curvature radius.
11. The drill according to claim 10, wherein the first end is located at a rear side of a rotation direction in the boundary line, and the second end is located at a front side of the rotation direction in the boundary line.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
(6) The following is a description of the drill according to the present invention using
(7) A drill 1 of
(8) According to
(9) Also, the cutting edge 3 is provided from near the center O1 of the drill 1 to the outer peripheral edge of a circle of diameter D, and is continuous with the side surface of the drill body 2. In other words, the drill body 2 includes two cutting edges 3, two chip evacuation flutes 10, two heels 4, and two first gashes 6. Also, a heel trailing edge 13 of the heel 4 on the side opposite to the cutting edge 3 is provided in contact with the chip evacuation flute 10 in a position opposite the cutting edge 3.
(10) In the front view of
(11) Also, as illustrated in
(12) In the present embodiment, in the side view illustrated in
(13) Also, in a cross-section orthogonal to the rotation center axis O at a position where the chip evacuation flute 10 is present as illustrated in
(14) Two first gashes 6 are provided with point symmetry about the center O1. Also, when the drill 1 is viewed from the tip side, a central ridge portion 8 is provided in a portion that includes the center O1 and is sandwiched between the two first gashes 6, 6. When the central ridge portion 8 is viewed from the side direction, the central ridge portion tip angle from the both sides of the central ridge portion 8 towards the center O1 is from 170 to 190, and the ratio of the length (L) of the central ridge portion 8 to the diameter (D) of the drill 1 (L/D) is from 0.15 to 0.25. As a result of the presence of the central ridge portion 8 with this configuration, the chip evacuation performance is good, and breakage of the central ridge portion 8 can be reduced. Here, the diameter D of the drill 1 indicates the distance between the outer peripheral edges of the two cutting edges 3, 3, and when a hole is drilled using the drill 1 of diameter D, a hole of diameter D can be formed. Also, the central ridge portion angle indicates the angle formed by the ridge lines on both sides with the rotation center axis O as the center for the end portion ridge lines on the tip side when the central ridge portion 8 is viewed from the side. In addition, the length (L) of the central ridge portion 8 indicates the length between two first gash ridge lines 9, which are the intersecting ridge lines between the first gash 6 and the heel 4, at the center O1 when the two first gash ridge lines 9 are extended.
(15) Also, according to the present embodiment, the ratio (W/L) of the width (W) of the central ridge portion 8 to the length (L) of the central ridge portion 8 is from 0.15 to 0.40. In this way, the cutting resistance near the center O1 can be reduced, and damage to the central ridge portion 8 can be reduced. Here, the width (W) of the central ridge portion 8 indicates the width of the central ridge portion 8 at the center O1.
(16) Note that in the present embodiment, the ratio (a/D) of the distance (a) from the cutting edge 3 to the terminating edge of the first gash 6 to the drill diameter (D) is from 0.3 to 0.5. The first gash 6 enlarges the chip evacuation flute 10 near the cutting edge 3, and has the action of minimizing blockage within the chip evacuation flute 10 of chips with an undefined forward direction immediately after being generated.
(17) In addition, the opening angle of the chip evacuation flute 10 illustrated in
(18) Also, in a cross-section that is orthogonal to the rotation center axis O at a position in which the chip evacuation flute is present in
(19) Here, according to the present embodiment, the radius of curvature at the outer peripheral end P of the cutting edge side wall surface 14 is from 1.10 to 1.60 times the diameter D of the drill 1, the radius of curvature at the flute bottom 11 is from 0.56 to 0.9 times the diameter D of the drill 1, and the radius of curvature at the outer peripheral end Q of the heel side wall surface 15 is from 0.45 to 0.55 times the diameter D of the drill 1. Here, in the present invention, the flute bottom 11 is defined as the point of intersection of the drill 1 and the circle c of diameter d used to define the web thickness d. Also, the cutting edge side wall surface 14 is defined as being on the side of the point P from the flute bottom 11, and the heel side wall surface 15 is defined as being on the side of the point Q from the flute bottom 11. Also, in the present invention, when measuring the radius of curvature from the cutting edge side wall surface 14 to the heel side wall surface 15, in the cross-sectional view of
(20) Also, in the present embodiment, as illustrated in
(21) Here, in the present embodiment, when viewed from the tip side, the cutting edge 3 is recessed in the counter rotational direction of the drill 1, and the height (H) of the recess of the cutting edge 3 has a size equal to or smaller than the width (W) of the central ridge portion 8. In other words, the cutting edge 3 side of the heel 4 is depressed into a recess, and the amount of the depression (H) of the cutting edge 3 side of the heel 4 corresponding to the height (H) of the recess of the cutting edge 3 has a size equal to or smaller than the width (W) of the central ridge portion 8. In this way, the height of the protrusion formed in the machined surface with the drill 1 can be reduced, which has the effect that the machined surface of the drill 1 is flatter. Note that the height of the protrusion formed on the machined surface cut with the drill 1 reflects the height (H) of the recess portion of the cutting edge 3. The preferred range of H/W is from 0.51 to 0.70.
(22) Also, as illustrated in
(23) Also, a second gash 18 is provided on the outer peripheral end of the cutting edge 3, in other words at the corner between the tip face of the cutting edge 3 and the outer peripheral surface. In this way, damage to the corner can be reduced.
(24) In addition, according to the present embodiment, the chip evacuation performance is good and particularly effective in the case of drills 1 for which the diameter (D) is small, 3 mm or less, and in particular 1 to 3 mm, and for which the volume of the chip evacuation flute 10 is small.
Working Example 1
(25) Drills were prepared with a drill body made from cemented carbide alloy coated with a (TiAl) N-type hardened layer and with shapes as shown in Table 1. Note that the radius of curvature from the cutting edge side wall surface to the heel side wall surface was obtained by dividing the curve of the cutting edge side wall surface 14 and the curve of the heel side wall surface 15 into four equal parts each, and measuring the radius of curvature at the eight locations corresponding to the parts. Table 1 only shows the results for the portion that includes the point P (indicated as P in the table), the flute bottom, and the portion that includes the point Q (indicated as Q in the table), but the radius of curvature between the portion that includes the point P and the flute bottom, and between the flute bottom and the portion that includes the point Q were values between the two radii of curvature. Also, the performance of the drills was evaluated under the following cutting conditions. The results are shown in Table 2.
(26) (Cutting Conditions)
(27) Work material: S45C
(28) Drill diameter: 8 mm
(29) Cutting speed: 75 m/minute
(30) Spindle revolution: 3000 rpm
(31) Feed rate: 0.14 mm/revolution
(32) Cutting depth: 12 mm
(33) Cutting form: Plunge milling
(34) Cutting environment: Wet cutting
(35) Evaluation items: Shape of machined bottom face, chip evacuation performance after processing 250 holes, number of holes that could be processed, status of the drill at the time of completion of processing
(36) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Radius of Concavity depth/D* Radius of Drill Web curvature/D* Cutting Heel curvature at Specimen tip angle thickness Flute edge side side wall flute No () d/D* ** () a/D* P bottom Q wall surface surface bottom/D* I-1 165 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-2 170 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-3 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-4 190 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-5 195 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-6 180 0.05 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-7 180 0.1 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-8 180 0.2 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-9 180 0.25 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-10 180 0.15 80 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-11 180 0.15 85 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-12 180 0.15 110 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-13 180 0.15 115 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-14 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 1.4 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-15 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 1 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-16 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0 0.06 0.625 I-17 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.05 0.06 0.625 I-18 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.031 0.625 I-19 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.188 0.625 I-20 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.125 0.5 0.375 0.021 0.06 0.500 I-21 180 0.15 90 0.25 1.4 1.0 0.75 0.021 0.06 1.000 I-22 180 0.3 90 0.4 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-23 180 0.25 90 0.4 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-24 180 0.25 90 0.3 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-25 180 0.25 90 0.5 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 I-26 180 0.25 90 0.55 1.4 0.625 0.55 0.021 0.06 0.625 *D: Diameter of drill ** (): Opening angle of chip evacuation flute
(37) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Cutting performance Specimen Shape of machined Chip evacuation Number of holes No bottom face performance processed (No.) Drill status I-1 Recessed Good 400 Constant wear I-2 Virtually flat Good 400 Constant wear I-3 Flat Good 400 Constant wear I-4 Virtually flat Good 360 Small chipping I-5 Protruding 230 Defect I-6 Flat 25 Bending damage I-7 Flat Good 350 Chattering I-8 Flat Good 400 Constant wear I-9 Flat Tended to block 290 Constant wear I-10 Flat Tended to block 270 Large wear I-11 Flat Good 380 Constant wear I-12 Flat Tended to extend 370 Constant wear outside the flute I-13 Flat Contact with machined 260 Constant wear surface I-14 Flat Tended to block 255 Large wear I-15 Flat Tended to block 275 Large wear I-16 Flat Good 300 Wear I-17 Flat Good 300 Small chipping I-18 Flat Tended to extend 325 Constant wear outside the flute I-19 Flat Tended to block 315 Wear I-20 Flat Tended to block 320 Wear I-21 Flat Tended to extend 330 Constant wear outside the flute I-22 Flat Tended to block 275 Wear I-23 Flat Good 450 Constant wear I-24 Flat Good 400 Constant wear I-25 Flat Good 360 Constant wear I-26 Flat Tended to extend 320 Chattering outside the flute
(38) As shown in Tables 1 and 2, with Specimen No. I-1 in which the drill tip angle was smaller than 170, the machined bottom face had a recessed shape, and with Specimen No. I-5 in which the drill tip angle was larger than 190, the machined bottom face had a protruding shape, and it was not possible for both to produce a bottom face that was flat or substantially flat. Also with Specimen No. I-5 the outer peripheral end of the cutting edge became damaged, so the number of holes machined was small. In addition, with Specimen No. I-6 in which the web thickness was smaller than 0.10 times the drill diameter, the drill suffered bending damage. Also, with Specimen No. I-22 in which the web thickness was larger than 0.25 times the drill diameter, and Specimen I-10 in which the chip evacuation flute opening angle was smaller than 85, the chip evacuation flute was small, and the chips tended to become blocked. With Specimen I-13 in which the opening angle of the chip evacuation flute was larger than 110, the chips flew out from the chip evacuation flute and contacted the machined surface, so the surface roughness of the machined surface was poor. In addition, with Specimen I-14 in which the radius of curvature of the cutting edge side wall surface and the heel side wall surface were the same and the radius of curvature at the flute bottom was smaller than that at the heel side wall surface, and Specimen I-15 in which the radius of curvature at the flute bottom was smaller than that at the heel side wall surface, the chips scratched the wall surface of the chip evacuation flute and the flow of chips was poor, and the chips tended to be come blocked.
(39) In contrast, with Specimen Nos. I-2 to 4, 7 to 9, 11, 12, 16 to 21, 23 to 26, in which the drill tip angle was from 170 to 190, the web thickness was from 0.10 to 0.25 times the drill diameter, the opening angle of the chip evacuation flute was from 85 to 110, and the radius of curvature gradually reduced from the cutting edge side wall surface to the heel side wall surface, the shape of the machined bottom face was flat or substantially flat, the chip evacuation performance and the drill attitude was good, and the number of holes drilled was large.
Working Example 2
(40) Drills were prepared with the drill body of Working Example 1 coated with the hardened layer of Working Example 1 with shapes of
(41) (Cutting Conditions)
(42) Work material: S45C
(43) Drill diameter: 3 mm
(44) Cutting speed: 75 m/minute
(45) Spindle revolution: 8000 rpm
(46) Feed rate: 0.065 mm/revolution
(47) Cutting depth: 4.5 mm
(48) Cutting form: Plunge milling
(49) Cutting environment: Wet cutting
(50) Evaluation items: Shape of machined bottom face, chip evacuation performance after processing 250 holes, number of holes processed, status of the drill cutting edge at the time of completion of processing
(51) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Cutting performance Central Height of ridge protrusion or portion recess on Chip No. holes Specimen tip angle Central ridge portion (mm) machined bottom evacuation processed Bottom edge No () L/D W W/L H face (m) performance (No.) status II-1 167 0.20 0.150 0.250 0.090 140 Good 210 Small chipping II-2 170 0.20 0.150 0.250 0.090 131 Good 360 Constant wear II-3 180 0.20 0.155 0.258 0.090 4 Good 500 Constant wear II-4 190 0.20 0.155 0.258 0.090 131 Good 360 Small chipping II-5 193 0.20 0.155 0.258 0.090 140 Good 200 Corner chipping II-6 180 0.14 0.150 0.250 0.090 4 Tended to 240 Chattering block II-7 180 0.15 0.150 0.250 0.090 6 Good 250 Chattering II-8 180 0.25 0.170 0.283 0.090 4 Good 200 Small chipping II-9 180 0.26 0.170 0.283 0.090 4 Tended to 300 Central extend ridge portion chipping II-10 180 0.20 0.085 0.142 0.090 4 Good 300 Small chipping II-11 180 0.20 0.160 0.267 0.090 4 Good 500 Constant wear II-12 180 0.20 0.170 0.283 0.100 7 Good 500 Constant wear II-13 180 0.20 0.300 0.500 0.090 5 Good 450 Chattering II-14 180 0.20 0.170 0.283 <0.005 <1 Good 300 Small chipping II-15 180 0.20 0.150 0.250 0.110 14 Good 300 Constant wear II-16 180 0.20 0.180 0.300 0.130 17 Good 300 Constant wear
(52) As can be seen from Table 3,
(53) in all the test specimens, the shape of the machined bottom face was flat or the protrusion or recess was smaller than 150 m, the chip evacuation performance and the status of the drill were good, and the number of holes processed was large. In particular, with Specimen Nos. II-2 to 4, 7, 8, and 10 to 16 in which L/D was from 0.15 to 0.25 and the central ridge portion tip angle was from 170 to 190, the chip evacuation performance and the drill status was good, chipping did not occur in the central ridge portion, and the number of holes processed was large.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
(54) 1 Drill 2 Drill body 3 Cutting edge 4 Heel 5 Tip relief face 6 First gash 8 Central ridge portion 9 First gash ridge line 10 Chip evacuation flute 11 Flute bottom 13 Heel trailing edge 14 Cutting edge side wall surface 15 Heel side wall surface 17 First gash trailing edge 18 Second gash O Rotation center axis D Drill diameter Drill tip angle Central ridge portion tip angle Chip evacuation flute opening angle c The largest circle that can be drawn in the center portion of the drill in a cross-section orthogonal to the rotation center axis at a position where the chip evacuation flute is present d Web thickness P Outer peripheral end of the chip evacuation flute at the cutting edge side Q Outer peripheral end of the chip evacuation flute at the heel side L1 Straight line connecting the point P and the rotation center axis O L2 Straight line connecting the point Q and the rotation center axis O w1 Maximum concavity depth of cutting edge side wall surface w2 Maximum concavity depth of heel side wall surface