DIGITAL METHOD FOR FACILITATING THE ORGANISATION OF AN EVENT OR PROJECT
20190057330 ยท 2019-02-21
Inventors
Cpc classification
G06Q30/0252
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
A facilitation method for organizing an event or project consisting of the following steps: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices; allocation of an account for receipt of money from respondents upon triggering the event or project, the proposal: further enabling respondents to provide commitment to pay to attend or participate in the proposed event or project; electronic advertisement of the event or project; receiving preferences and commitments to pay from respondents; and determination of whether the received preferences and commitments to pay are sufficient to warrant the event or project being triggered.
Claims
1. A facilitation method for a proposer to propose an event or project with a subject to the public and enable them to indicate preferences amongst choices for it and financial intent to attend or participate, the method consisting in steps by the proposer of: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices; allocation of an account for receipt of money from respondents upon triggering the event or project, the proposal: further enabling respondents to provide commitment to pay to attend or participate in the proposed event or project; electronic advertisement of the event or project; receiving preferences and commitments to pay from respondents; and determination of whether the received preferences and commitments to pay are sufficient to warrant the event or project being triggered.
2. A facilitation method according to claim 1, wherein the subject of the event or project is selected from the set consisting of: entertainment, music in particular, events and projects travel events and projects academia events and projects professional events and projects and commercial events and projects.
3. A facilitation method according to claim 1, wherein the choices are a subset of the subject of the event or project.
4. A facilitation method according to claim 1, wherein the choices are unrelated to the subject of the event or project.
5. A facilitation method according to claim 1, wherein the choices include at least one level of subsidiary choices.
6. A facilitation method according to claim 1, wherein the commitments to pay include options.
7. A facilitation method for a proposer to propose an event or project with a subject to the public and enable them to indicate preferences amongst choices for it, the method consisting in steps by the proposer of: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices; electronic advertisement of the event or project; receiving preferences from respondents; and determination of whether the received preferences are sufficient to warrant the event or project being triggered.
8. A facilitation method according to claim 7, wherein the subject of the event or project is selected from the set consisting of: entertainment, music in particular, events and projects travel events and projects academia events and projects professional events and projects and commercial events and projects.
9. A facilitation method according to claim 7, wherein the choices are a subset of the subject of the event or project.
10. A facilitation method according to claim 7, wherein the choices are unrelated to the subject of the event or project.
11. A facilitation method according to claim 7, wherein the choices include at least one level of subsidiary choices.
12. A facilitation method for a proposer to propose an event or project with a subject to the public and enable them to indicate preferences amongst choices for it, the method consisting in steps by the proposer of: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices; electronic advertisement of the event or project; receiving preferences from respondents; combining the received preferences with known data to provide a refined prediction of intention to attend or participate in the proposed event or project and determination of whether the refined prediction of intention is sufficient o warrant the event or project being triggered.
13. A facilitation method according to claim 12, the method including the steps of: allocation of an account for receipt of money from respondents upon triggering the event or project, the proposal: further enabling respondents to provide commitment to pay to attend or participate in the proposed event or project; and receiving commitments to pay from respondents.
14. A facilitation method according to claim 13, wherein the commitments to pay include options.
15. A facilitation method according to claim 12, wherein the choices are a subset of the subject of the event or project.
16. A facilitation method according to claim 12, wherein the choices are unrelated to the subject of the event or project.
17. A facilitation method according to claim 12, wherein the choices include at least one level of subsidiary choices.
18. A facilitation method for a proposer to propose an event or project with a subject to the public and enable them to indicate preferences amongst choices for it, the method consisting in steps by the proposer of: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices; electronic advertisement of the event or project; enabling a potential respondent to modify the choices for the proposal and to request electronic advertisement of the proposal; receiving preferences from respondents to the modified proposal; and determination of whether the received preferences are sufficient to warrant the modified proposal project being triggered.
19. A facilitation method according to claim 18, wherein provision is made for modification of the subject of the event or project and/or choices therefor.
20. A facilitation method according to claim 18, the method including the steps of: allocation of an account for receipt of money from respondents upon triggering the event or project, the proposal: further enabling respondents to provide commitment to pay to attend or participate in the proposed event or project; and receiving commitments to pay from respondents.
21. A facilitation method according to claim 20, wherein the commitments to pay include options.
22. A facilitation method according to claim 18, wherein the choices are a subset of the subject of the event or project.
23. A facilitation method according to claim 18, wherein the choices are unrelated to the subject of the event or project.
24. A facilitation method according to claim 18, wherein the choices include at least one level of subsidiary choices.
25. A facilitation method for a proposer to propose an event or project with a subject to the public and enable them to indicate preferences amongst choices for it, the method consisting in steps by the proposer of: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling individual respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices and identity of a reward-worth member of the public by whom awareness the event or project was brought to attention of the responding respondent; electronic advertisement of the event or project; receiving preferences from respondents; determination of whether the received preferences are sufficient to warrant the event or project being triggered and rewarding the reward worthy member of the public.
26. A facilitation method according to claim 25, wherein the reward is selected from the set consisting of: an introduction to a significant participant in the event or project, a momento thereof, participation in charitable work.
27. A facilitation method according to claim 25, wherein the commitments to pay include options.
28. A facilitation method according to claim 25, wherein the choices are a subset of the subject of the event or project.
29. A facilitation method according to claim 25, wherein the choices are unrelated to the subject of the event or project.
30. A facilitation method according to claim 25, wherein the choices include at least one level of subsidiary choices.
31. A facilitation method for a proposer to propose an event or project with a subject to the public and enable them to indicate preferences amongst choices for it, the method consisting in steps by the proposer of: making a proposal of an event or project, the proposal: setting out choices for the event or project and enabling individual respondents to indicate preferences amongst the choices and a telecommunication address or number; electronic advertisement of the event or project; receiving preferences from respondents; distributing to respondents the telecommunication address or number of other respondents and determination of whether the received preferences are sufficient to warrant the event or project being triggered.
32. A facilitation method according to claim 31, wherein the telecommunication address or number of all previous respondents is distributed to all previous respondents.
33. A facilitation method according to claim 31, wherein the respondents are divided into groups and possibly sub-groups to be put in communication with each other.
34. A facilitation method according to claim 32, wherein the groups selected from the set consisting of: time of response, a predetermined number of respondents, geographic location or age.
35. A facilitation method according to claim 31, wherein, with a view to a reward for promoting the project of event, respondents are provided with means for providing the communication details of other potential responders to whom the proposal can be advertised.
36. A facilitation method according to claim 36, wherein reward status is augmented by subsequent response by those to whom the event was advertised in this way.
Description
[0103] To help understanding of the invention, a specific embodiment thereof will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0104]
[0105]
[0106]
[0107]
[0108] Referring to
[0116] The invention is not intended to be restricted to the details of the above described embodiment. For instance, it is possible that the party does not propose the event, but instead a member of the public does, as in the second embodiment. It is also possible that the accounts are created by the respondents for use within the method, these accounts could be pre-existing accounts such as PayPal or Facebook accounts.
[0117] Referring to
[0126] Referring to
[0127] Referring to
[0128] The above embodiments are on the basis that the event or project, a concert or a seminar for instance, are proposed to be in a certain are geographic area. However, where for instance the public are able to participate on line, either actively interactively or passively, a geographic limitation on the proposal is of no consequence. However it is within the invention that such an event such as a live broadcast, receivable on payment of a fee, of an opera or concert should be proposed. The choices could be between different performances on different dates. The method allows the public to indicate which operas they wish to view and for the proposer to know which it is economic to broadcast in this way.
[0129] Again academic and professional lectures can be proposed, chosen and determined in the same way.
[0130] In the travel field, cruises by sea and railway excursions could be proposed in the same way, for instance as regards choices between cities visited and the order of visiting.
[0131] In all these examples, there can be main choices such as: [0132] In the field of opera when a company is planning its season of performances, a main choice between composers and subsidiary choices between actual operas; [0133] In the field of the arts, when a company is planning accompanied tours, the main choice could be between painters, sculptors & architects and the subsidiary sub-choices between the actual works of art; [0134] In the field of academia, when a summer school is planning its curriculum, the main choices could be between ancient, post classical, mediaeval and modem history and the sub-choices between Greek, Italian, French, German and English histories for instance.
[0135] The commitments can include media of participation, such as physical attendance, receipt of audio-visual streaming or merely audio streaming.
[0136] The event of project may be one in which a commitment to pay is not appropriate, such as a proposed event in which volunteers clear up eye-sores and in which the choices relate to what eye-sore is in most need of clearing up and when.
[0137] The received preferences may be advantageously combined with known data. For instance, expressions of interest in classical music as a part of an excursion as opposed to modern music is likely to indicate a predominance of older respondents. In turn, if the respondents have indicated from their banking details a predominance from non-English speaking countries, there is more likelihood of the need to provide multi-lingual tour guides. Algorithms for such predictions are straightforward and require no elaboration.
[0138] It is anticipated that an originally proposed event or project may be recognised by respondents as susceptible of improvement. To allow for this, respondents may be enabled to propose modified events.
[0139] The respondents may be encouraged to identify the person from whom they heard of the event or project. This can result in the person causing most dissemination of news of the event to be rewarded.
[0140] The respondent may also be encouraged to give a telecommunication number or address, whereby they can participate in a chat group and spread the word about the project or event.