Method for determining optimal preservation temperature of anaerobic ammonium oxidation biofilm in wastewater treatment for total nitrogen removal
11513053 · 2022-11-29
Assignee
Inventors
- Shuo Wang (Wuxi, CN)
- Yin Zhu (Wuxi, CN)
- Xuesong Yi (Wuxi, CN)
- Ji Li (Wuxi, CN)
- Yan WANG (Wuxi, CN)
- Junhua Zheng (Wuxi, CN)
Cpc classification
C12N1/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D71/56
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C02F3/307
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
B01D71/56
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present disclosure discloses a method for determining optimal preservation temperature of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm in wastewater treatment, and belongs to the technical field of environmental engineering. The method of the present disclosure characterizes the ratio of living cells, early apoptotic cells, late apoptotic cells and dead cells in the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm by flow cytometry, and the optimum storage temperature can be measured within a few hours. The method of the present disclosure performs correlation analysis on the characteristic indexes of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm activity recovery process to verify the reliability of the data. By using the method of the present disclosure, the step of recovering the biofilm activity can be omitted, the removal rates of ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen were over 90% and 85%, respectively.
Claims
1. A method, comprising determining an optimum preservation temperature of an anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm through the following steps: measuring a cell activity state of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm based on flow cytometry; comparing measured results of the cell activity states of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm preserved at different temperatures with those of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm before preservation; and taking a preservation temperature closest to the cell activity state of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm before preservation as the optimum preservation temperature, wherein the measuring the cell activity state comprises measuring contents of living cells, early apoptotic cells, late apoptotic cells and dead cells; wherein the measuring the cell activity state of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm based on the flow cytometry comprises: (1) preparing a test sample solution of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm: diluting an anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm sample with a buffer, shaking evenly, filtering, centrifuging, leaving a supernatant, purging the cells with a pre-cooled phosphate buffer, repeating centrifugation and wash twice, then taking the supernatant as a sample, and mixing well with an appropriate amount of 10 x Annexin V Binding Buffer; wherein the buffer contains a phosphate buffer and fetal bovine serum, a pH value of the buffer is 7.2-8.0, and a dilution ratio with the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm is (8-10):1; and (2) placing in a flow cytometer for measuring a cell activity state of each sample solution; wherein a nylon membrane having a pore size of 6-8 μm is used for filtration; wherein the method further comprises initiating anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm engineering after determining an optimum preservation temperature of an anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, and preliminarily culturing and maturing the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm; placing in a preservation medium and preserving at the optimum preservation temperature; recovering activity; and using for an engineering application.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the measuring the cell activity state of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm based on the flow cytometry comprises: (1) preparing a test sample solution of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm: diluting an anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm sample with a buffer, shaking evenly, filtering, centrifuging, leaving a supernatant, purging the cells with a pre-cooled phosphate buffer, repeating centrifugation and wash twice, then taking the supernatant as a sample, and mixing well with an appropriate amount of 10 x Annexin V Binding Buffer; and (2) placing in a flow cytometer for measuring a cell activity state of each sample solution.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the buffer contains a phosphate buffer and fetal bovine serum.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein a volume ratio of the phosphate buffer and fetal bovine serum in the buffer is 8:1-10:1.
5. The method according to claim 2, wherein the phosphate buffer comprises 0.2 mol/L of sodium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.2 mol/L of disodium hydrogen phosphate.
6. The method according to claim 2, wherein a pH value of the buffer is 7.2-8.0, and a dilution ratio with the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm is (8-10):1.
7. The method according to claim 2, wherein a nylon membrane having a pore size of 6-8 μm is used for filtration.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the preservation medium has 1500 mg/L of KHCO.sub.3, 15 mg/L of K.sub.2HPO.sub.4, 180 mg/L of MgSO.sub.4, 20 mg/L of CaCl.sub.2, 50 mg/L of NH.sub.4.sup.+—N, and 75 mg/L of NO.sub.2.sup.−—N.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(4) The wastewater of the wastewater treatment plant of the present disclosure includes domestic water in residential areas and a small part of industrial wastewater in the upstream, and the annual average of inflow water is COD of 236 mg/L, ammonia nitrogen of 30.1 mg/L, total nitrogen of 37.8 mg/L, and total phosphorus of 4.5 mg/L. The nitrate nitrogen content is less than 1.0 mg/L.
Example 1
(5) Preservation Conditions of Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm:
(6) The preservation temperature of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm was set to −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C. 150 of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm suspension filled in sludge dewatering filtrate treatment tank was taken out, divided into three equal portions and placed in 1000 mL serum bottles (the serum bottle is pre-filled with N.sub.2 to expel O.sub.2 from the air) containing 750 mL of preservation medium, respectively. The components of preservation medium were as follows: KHCO.sub.3 of 1500 mg/L, K.sub.2HPO.sub.4 of 15 mg/L, MgSO.sub.4 of 1800 mg/L, CaCl.sub.2 of 20 mg/L, NH.sub.4.sup.+—N(NH.sub.4Cl) of 50 mg/L, and NO.sub.2.sup.−—N(NaNO.sub.2) of 75 mg/L. Serum bottles (3 parallel samples at each preservation temperature) were placed at −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C., and stored statically in the dark.
(7) Cell State Characterization of Stored Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm:
(8) Anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C. were stored for more than 120 days, and then used to determine the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm cell status. Cell state test conditions by flow cytometry were as follows:
(9) (1) Picked up 10 ml of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, diluted to 100 mL with a mixed buffer of pH 7.8 phosphate buffer and fetal bovine serum, and shaken for 2 min in a vortexer to break the biofilm into flocs and ensure a uniform distribution;
(10) (2) The crushed sample was filtered through a nylon membrane having a pore size of 8 μm, and 1.5 mL was placed in a 1.5 mL sharp-bottomed centrifuge tube;
(11) (3) The sample was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min;
(12) (4) The supernatant of the sample after centrifugation was pipetted with leaving about 0.1 mL of sample, the cells were purged with pre-cooled mixed buffer of pH 7.8 phosphate buffer and fetal bovine serum (pH 7.8), and the centrifugation and wash were repeated twice;
(13) (5) The supernatant of the sample after centrifugation was pipetted with leaving about 0.1 mL of sample, and mixed well with 0.3 mL of 10× Annexin V Binding Buffer;
(14) (6) 0.5 μL of PI staining agent was added to the control FITC Annexin V group, 0.5 μL of FITC Annexin V was added to the control PI group, 0.5 μL of FITC Annexin V and 0.5 μL of PI were added to the test group, which were mixed well and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, and then tested on a flow cytometer.
(15) The cell state results of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm were shown in Table 1. The living cell proportion of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm suspension filled in sludge dewatering filtrate treatment tank was higher, indicating that the sludge dewatering filtrate of sewage treatment plant has good treatment effect on high ammonia nitrogen. The anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at 20° C. had the lowest living cell content, indicating that it was not suitable to store anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm at 20° C. The anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at 4° C. had the highest proportion of living cell, reaching 65%, and had a proportion of late apoptotic cells and dead cells of about 17.8%, indicating that the preservation condition at 4° C. was more suitable for storing anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm. When the preservation temperature was −20° C., the living cell proportion of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm was 50.1%, which was only 22.9% lower than that of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at 4° C., but the late apoptotic cells and dead cells proportion of about 39.5%, indicating that it was not suitable to store anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm at −20° C. Therefore, it was preliminarily determined that 4° C. was the optimum temperature for storing anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm.
(16) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Cell activity states (%) of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored for 120 days Early Late Anaerobic ammonia Living apoptotic apoptotic Dead oxidation biofilm cells cells cells cells Sludge dewatering 82.5 ± 4.8 3.7 ± 1.6 5.9 ± 2.1 7.9 ± 1.6 filtrate of sewage treatment plant Stored at −20° C. 50.1 ± 3.0 20.8 ± 1.6 18.7 ± 1.9 10.4 ± 1.9 Stored at 4° C. 65.0 ± 3.5 17.2 ± 1.9 15.5 ± 2.1 2.3 ± 0.2 Stored at 20° C. 35.8 ± 3.5 28.6 ± 3.1 27.9 ± 3.0 7.7 ± 0.8
Example 2: Verification of the Test Results of Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm
(17) A bioreactor was selected for activity recovery. Specific operating conditions include:
(18) The anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm derived from different serum bottles was inoculated into a bioreactor (effective volume of 10.0 L) for the activity recovery of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm. the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C. was placed in bioreactor 1 (R1), bioreactor 2 (R2) and bioreactor 3 (R3), respectively. The bioreactor was pre-passed with N.sub.2 to reduce the inhibition of oxygen to the anaerobic ammonia oxidation bacteria, and the HRT was set to 4 h, and the filling ratio of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm suspension filler was 40%.
Example 3: Characteristics of Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm after Activity Recovery
(19) After 30 days of activity recovery, the characteristics of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm in R1, R2 and R3 were shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, after recovering the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, the density and particle size of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm at 4° C. and −20° C. were close to those of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm before preservation, but the density (p) and thickness (L) of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at 20° C. decreased slightly. The mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at different preservation temperatures was reduced, but after activity recovery, the MLSS of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm at 4° C. and −20° C. was close to the MLSS of the anaerobic ammonia before storage, indicating that anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm re-adapted to the environment and the biomass was stably increased. Generally, the specific ANAMMOX activity (SAA) and Heme C content of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm were 0.27 gN/gMLVSS.Math.d (MLVSS: mixed liquid volatile suspended solids) and 2.3 μmol/gVSS (VSS: volatile suspended solid), respectively. The domesticated anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm in the wastewater treatment plant will respectively take 32 d and 24 d to reach the same SAA and Heme C content. After the activity of the stored anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm was recovered, the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm in R1 will respectively take 9 d and 13 d to reach the same SAA and Heme C content, the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm in R2 will respectively take 7 d and 11 d to reach the same SAA and Heme C content, and the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm in R3 will respectively take 11 d and 17 d to reach the same SAA and Heme C content, indicating that the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm after the activity recovery all had better nitrogen removal effects, wherein the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at the temperature of 4° C. has the shortest activity recovery time and the condition at 4° C. was more suitable for storing the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm.
(20) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Properties of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm after preservation and activity recovery Time (d) Time (d) required for required for Heme C SAA to be content to be ρ L MLSS MLVSS more than 0.27 more than 2.3 (g/cm.sup.3) (μm) (g/cm.sup.2) (g/m.sup.2) gN/gMLVSS .Math. d μmol/gVSS Before sludge 0.039 301 15.9 7.5 32 24 preservation After anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm preservation After preservation 0.025 251 13.1 6.2 — — at −20° C. After preservation 0.031 279 14.7 6.4 — — at 4° C. After preservation 0.020 205 13.3 5.9 — — at 20° C. After activity recovery of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm Anaerobic ammonia 0.038 289 14.5 7.3 9 13 oxidation biofilm stored at −20° C. Anaerobic ammonia 0.040 297 15.4 7.2 7 11 oxidation biofilm stored at 4° C. Anaerobic ammonia 0.035 268 14.5 6.8 11 17 oxidation biofilm stored at 20° C.
Example 4: Settling Performance and Stability of Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm after Activity Recovery
(21) Extracellular polymer was an important factor in the formation of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, and the ratio (PN/PS) of protein (PN) substance to polysaccharide (PS) substance in extracellular polymer was an important index for measuring the structural stability of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm. The changes in the extracellular polymer PN/PS during activity recovery process of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm were shown in
Example 5: Removal Efficiency of Pollutants by Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm after Activity Recovery
(22) After the activity recovery process, the removal rates of ammonia nitrogen (AN) and total nitrogen (TN) by anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm at different preservation temperatures were gradually increased (
Example 6: Correlation Between Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm Characteristics and Cell States after Activity Recovery
(23) After 30 d of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm activity recovery, flow cytometry was used to analyze the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm cell states (as shown in Table 3). The living cell content in anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm at different preservation temperatures was basically the same as the content of living cells in the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm of the pilot system, indicating that all of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm after the activity recovery can play the role of nitrogen removal. Among them, the proportion of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm living cells in R2 was the highest (85.1%±5.0%), and the proportion of late apoptotic cells 6.1%±1.8%) and the proportion of dead cells (3.7%±0.3%) were the lowest, indicating the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm cells stored at 4° C. had the highest cell activity and 4° C. was more suitable as a condition for storing anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm.
(24) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Cell activity states (%) of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm cells after activity recovery (30 d) Early Late Anaerobic ammonia Living apoptotic apoptotic Dead oxidation biofilm cells cells cells cells Sludge dewatering 87.5 ± 5.1 4.9 ± 1.1 5.1 ± 1.2 2.5 ± 0.5 filtrate of sewage treatment plant Stored at −20° C. 83.0 ± 4.5 5.8 ± 1.7 6.1 ± 1.9 5.1 ± 1.0 Stored at 4° C. 85.1 ± 5.0 5.1 ± 1.6 6.1 ± 1.8 3.7 ± 0.3 Stored at 20° C. 80.3 ± 5.5 5.5 ± 1.5 8.9 ± 1.2 5.3 ± 1.0
(25) According to Correl correlation analysis, it was found that the SAA and the Heme C content of Anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm had a very high correlation with the proportion of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm living cells (as shown in Table 4), and the correlation coefficients were 0.9974 and 0.9930, respectively, indicating that the use of the proportion of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm living cells as a method for evaluating the activity of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm was extremely feasible. At the same time, in the stored anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, the proportion of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm living cells was the highest under the preservation condition of 20° C., which was consistent with results for the proportion of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm living cells in R2 after activity recovery.
(26) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Correlation between anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm characteristics and cell activity sates after activity recovery Anaerobic ammonia Anaerobic ammonia Anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm oxidation biofilm oxidation biofilm stored at −20° C. stored at 4° C. stored at 20° C. SAA (gN/gMLVSS .Math. d) 0.30 0.33 0.27 Heme C content (μmol/gVSS) 2.5 2.6 2.3 Living cell proportion (%) 83.0 ± 4.5 85.1 ± 5.0 80.3 ± 5.5 Correlation between SAA and 0.9974 living cells Correlation between Heme C 0.9930 content with living cells
(27) Therefore, it was determined that 4° C. was the most suitable condition for storing anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, and flow cytometry can be used as the basis for determining the optimum preservation temperature of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm. Flow cytometry is easy to operate, the data are fast and easy to obtain, accurate and reliable, and the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm activity recovery process can be omitted, which is of great significance for the preservation and activity recovery of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm.
Example 7
(28) Preservation Conditions of Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm:
(29) The preservation temperature of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm was set to −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C. 150 of the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm suspension filled in sludge dewatering filtrate treatment tank was taken out, divided into three equal portions and placed in 1000 mL serum bottles (the serum bottle is pre-filled with N.sub.2 to expel O.sub.2 from the air) containing 750 mL of preservation medium, respectively. The components of preservation medium were as follows: KHCO.sub.3 of 1500 mg/L, K.sub.2HPO.sub.4 of 15 mg/L, MgSO.sub.4 of 1800 mg/L, CaCl.sub.2 of 20 mg/L, NH.sub.4.sup.+—N(NH.sub.4Cl) of 50 mg/L, and NO.sub.2.sup.−—N(NaNO.sub.2) of 75 mg/L. Serum bottles (3 parallel samples at each preservation temperature) were placed at −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C., and stored statically in the dark.
(30) Cell State Characterization of Stored Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Biofilm:
(31) Anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored at −20° C., 4° C. and 20° C. were stored for more than 120 days, and then used to determine the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm cell status. Cell state test conditions by flow cytometry were as follows:
(32) (1) Picked up 10 mL of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm, diluted to 100 mL with phosphate buffer of pH 7.8, and shaken for 2 min in a vortexer to break the biofilm into flocs and ensure a uniform distribution;
(33) (2) The crushed sample was filtered through a nylon membrane having a pore size of 8 μm, and 1.5 mL was placed in a 1.5 mL sharp-bottomed centrifuge tube;
(34) (3) The sample was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min;
(35) (4) The supernatant of the sample after centrifugation was pipetted with leaving about 0.1 mL of sample, the cells were purged with pre-cooled phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), and the centrifugation and wash were repeated twice;
(36) (5) The supernatant of the sample after centrifugation was pipetted with leaving about 0.1 mL of sample, and mixed well with 0.3 mL of 10× Annexin V Binding Buffer;
(37) (6) 0.5 μL of PI staining agent was added to the control FITC Annexin V group, 0.5 μL of FITC Annexin V was added to the control PI group, 0.5 μL of FITC Annexin V and 0.5 μL of PI were added to the test group, which were mixed well and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, and then tested on a flow cytometer.
(38) The cell state results of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm were shown in Table 5.
(39) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Cell activity states (%) of anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm stored for 120 days (the buffer was pH 7.8 phosphate buffer) Early Late Anaerobic ammonia Living apoptotic apoptotic Dead oxidation biofilm cells cells cells cells Stored at −20° C. 52.5 ± 8.0 19.7 ± 3.5 16.3 ± 3.9 11.5 ± 2.7 Stored at 4° C. 62.5 ± 8.5 16.2 ± 3.9 18.8 ± 3.5 2.5 ± 1.5 Stored at 20° C. 40.5 ± 5.5 25.7 ± 5.1 29.1 ± 3.6 4.7 ± 2.3
(40) From the results of Table 5, it was found that the difference data in cell activity measured by using pH 7.8 phosphate buffer as the buffer under different temperatures, was significantly weaker than the activity data results measured by using the same pH phosphate buffer-fetal bovine serum mixed buffer as the buffer. The activity data measured by using pH 7.8 phosphate buffer as the buffer, has a large numerical deviation and a wide fluctuation range, which will significantly affect the results of flow cytometry. Combined with the weak variability of cell activity data at different storage temperatures, it was easy to cause large deviations in the end, and the test results and verification results did not match. Finally, flow cytometry cannot be used as a basis for effective storage temperature judgment.
(41) At the same time, the pH of the buffer solution had a greater influence on the state of the cells during the test. It was the environment with weak alkaline pH 7.2-8.0 that had a good effect on the analysis of cell activity data, while the neutral acidity or excessive alkaline conditions had a small gap between the cell status data below, and the result cannot be accurately judged.
(42) In addition, the anaerobic ammonia oxidation biofilm samples were respectively prepared with pore sizes of 6 μm and 10 μm, and it was found that the analysis results of the sample prepared with pore size of 6 μm were consistent with the verification experiment, and the data was reliable; the corresponding data with 10 μm did not have analytical capacity and cannot be used to determine the optimum preservation temperature.