SINGLE STAGE PROCESS COMBINING NON-NOBLE AND NOBLE METAL CATALYST LOADING
20190048270 · 2019-02-14
Assignee
Inventors
- David VANNAUKER (Kingwood, TX, US)
- Samuel J. COOPER (Palos Park, IL, US)
- Asbjørn Sune ANDERSSON (Bagsværd, DK)
- Rasmus Gottschalck Egeberg (Fredensborg, DK)
Cpc classification
C10G45/08
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C10G65/08
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C10G45/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C10G65/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
The present disclosure relates to a process for reducing the amount of aromatics in a raw feed stream comprising hydrocarbons, more than 200 ppmw sulfur or 1000 ppmw sulfur as either hydrocarbon heteroatoms or as other sulfide compounds as well as at least 10% by weight di-aromatics or poly-aromatics and at least 30% by weight aromatics in total said process comprising the steps of hydrotreating said raw feed stream in the presence of hydrogen and a material catalytically active in hydrotreatment with a severity resulting in a conversion of sulfur hydro-carbon heteroatoms to hydrogen sulfide of at least 50% providing a pre-treated stream, separating said pre-treated stream at least into a second stage feed stream and a stream rich in hydrogen sulfide, directing said second stage feed stream to contact a material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening, and to contact a material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics, wherein the material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening is positioned upstream, downstream or mixed with said material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics, and withdrawing a dearomatized stream, wherein said the amount of aromatics of said dearomatized stream is less than 50%, 70%, 90% or 95% of the amount of aromatics in said raw feed stream, with the associated benefit of said process of providing efficient dearomatization with low yield loss.
Claims
1. A process for reduced the amount of aromatics in a raw feed stream comprising hydrocarbons, more than 200 ppmw sulfur or 1000 ppmw sulfur as either hydrocarbon heteroatoms or as other sulfide compounds as well as at least 10% by weight di-aromatics or poly-aromatics and at least 30% by weight aromatics in total said process comprising the steps of i. hydrotreating said raw feed stream in the presence of hydrogen and a material catalytically active in hydrotreatment with a severity resulting in a conversion of sulfur hydrocarbon heteroatoms to hydrogen sulfide of at least 50% providing a pre-treated stream, ii. separating said pre-treated stream at least into a second stage feed stream and a stream rich in hydrogen sulfide, iii. directing said second stage feed stream to contact a material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening, and to contact a material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics, wherein the material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening is positioned upstream, downstream or mixed with said material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics, and withdrawing a dearomatized stream, wherein said the amount of aromatics of said dearomatized stream is less than 50%, 70%, 90% or 95% of the amount of aromatics in said raw feed stream.
2. The process according to claim 1 wherein said material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening first material comprises a base metal and is provided in presulfided form and said and said material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics comprises a noble metal and is provided in prereduced form.
3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening comprises one or more base metals preferably taken from the group comprising group 6 elements and Ni or Mo.
4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the material catalytically active in hydrocracking and ring opening comprises an acidic support, such as a zeolite or silica-alumina.
5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics comprises one or more one or more noble metals preferably taken from the group comprising Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir and Pt, and more preferably taken from the group comprising Pt and Pd.
6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the material catalytically active in saturation of aromatics comprises an acidic support, such as a zeolite or silica-alumina
7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the maximum temperature of the first catalytically active material is 250 C.-350 C.
8. The process according to claim 1, wherein the maximum temperature of the second catalytically active material is 250 C.-350 C.
9. The process according to claim 1, wherein the difference between the outlet temperature of the first catalytically active material and inlet temperature of the second catalytically active material is less than 40 C.
10. A process plant for conversion of a stream of heavy aromatic hydrocarbon mixture in to a hydrocarbon mixture rich in middle distillate comprising a first stage reactor unit containing a hydrotreatment catalyst, said first stage reactor unit having an inlet and an outlet, a means for gas/liquid separation having an inlet and a gas outlet and a liquid outlet, and a second stage reactor unit comprising one or several reactors and containing at least a presulfided material catalytically active in hydrocracking and a prereduced material catalytically active in hydrodearomatization, said second stage reactor unit having one or more inlets and a single outlet, in which the stream of heavy aromatic hydrocarbon mixture is in fluid communication with an inlet of the first stage reactor, the outlet of the first stage reactor unit is in fluid communication with the inlet of the means for gas/liquid separation, the outlet for liquid of the first means for gas/liquid separation is in fluid communication with the inlet of the second reactor unit, a stream of hydrogen is optionally in fluid communication with a further inlet of the second reactor, the outlet of the second reactor unit provides the hydrocarbon mixture rich in middle distillate.
Description
[0063]
[0064]
[0065] In
[0066] As the hydrocracking catalyst active in hydrodearomatization as well as hydrocracking, if it is operated at moderate temperature it will catalyze dearomatization by ring opening while it will catalyze hydrocracking at elevated temperature. Therefore, the inlet temperature to reactor 22 will make it possible to control the extent of hydrocracking, and accordingly it will be uncomplicated to switch between active hydrocracking (at elevated temperatures) and ring opening and moderate hydrocracking at intermediate temperatures.
[0067] In
[0068] In
[0069] In this configuration, the temperature of the hydrocracking catalyst is not independently controlled, as the effluent of hydrotreatment will be directed immediately to the hydrocracking catalyst. In addition, the presence of a high amount of sulfur will result in decreased catalyst activity, which therefore would require an elevated temperaturewith the consequence of reduced ring opening selectivity. This will cause an elevated diesel yield loss at similar dearomatization levels compared to the configuration of
EXAMPLE 1
[0070] Example 1 discloses operation of HDS, HDC and HDA process in accordance with
[0071] In Table 1 an example of operation according to the present process scheme (e.g. in accordance with
EXAMPLE 2
[0072] Example 2 discloses the influence of sulfur impurities in the feed to the second stage of a process such as the one shown in Example 1.
[0073] Table 2 shows the effect of increased H.sub.2S on 2nd stage effluent properties. Experiments A and B were carried out with a commercial base metal HDC catalyst loaded in a first reactor, from which the entire effluent was directed to a second reactor loaded with a commercial noble metal HDA catalyst. From the results it is seen that in this setup with either 17 wppm S or 163 wpp S in the feed mixture, the yield loss (i.e. the fraction boiling below 221 C.) is the same and that the dearomatization is close to complete in both cases as well.
EXAMPLE 3
[0074] Example 3 discloses in Table 3 the influence of carbon monoxide impurities in the feed to the second stage of a process such as the one shown in Example 1.
[0075] Experiments C and D were carried out in a setup similar to that of Example 2but with the catalysts loaded in the same reactor, hence the results are not directly comparable with those of Experiments A and B. Here the experiments shows that the presence of 140 ppm CO results in the same dearomatization, but a slightly increase in yield loss of 1.5%.
EXAMPLE 4
[0076] Example 4 discloses in Table 4 the characteristics of two alternative pretreatments of the same LCO feed, corresponding to reactor 6 of
[0077] If the liquid fraction of the effluents of the two pre-treatments of Example 4 would be directed to a process corresponding to Example 1, either directly to HDA (for the combined HDT+HDC effluent according to the prior art) or to HDC/HDA (for the HDT only effluent according to the present disclosure), it is clear that the high dearomatization activity of the base metal HDC catalyst in the semi-sweet environment of reactor 22 of
[0078] The dearomatization observed over the HDC catalyst is assumed to be due to partial cracking processes, in which aromatic rings are opened, without decomposing the molecules further. If the process severity is increased further, such ring opening may be increased, but so will decomposition of the molecules, resulting in increased yield loss.
[0079] The results of Example 4 in combination with Example 1 therefore confirm the benefit of upgrading LCO to diesel in accordance with the present disclosure, as the yield loss for similar dearomatization is lower.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 HDT 2nd-stg HDC HDA FEED eff FEED eff eff Sulfur, wt ppm 4200 25 17 <1 <1 Nitrogen, wt ppm 1000 2 1 <1 <1 Aromatics, D6591 1 ring, wt % 21.7 52.8 32.7 8.7 0.6 2 rings, wt % 30 2.3 1.5 <0.1 <0.1 3+ rings, wt % 5.9 0.2 0.1 <0.05 <0.05 Fraction <221 C., wt % 11.1 15.9 10.9 35.4 35.8 Yield loss 5.4% 27.5% 0.6%
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 CASE A B Sulfur feed, wt ppm 17 163 Sulfur, wt ppm <1 <1 SG 60/60 F 0.852 0.853 Aromatics, D6591 1 ring, wt % 0.57 0.55 2 rings, wt % <0.1 <0.1 3+ rings, wt % <0.05 <0.05 Fraction <221 C., wt % 24.6 24.3
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 CASE C D CO feed, wt ppm 0 140 Sulfur, wt ppm <1 <1 SG 60/60 F 0.859 0.858 Aromatics, D6591 1 ring, wt % 0.56 0.55 2 rings, wt % <0.1 <0.1 3+ rings, wt % <0.05 <0.05 Fraction <221 C., wt % 19.8 21.3
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 FEED HDT only HDT + HDC Sulfur, wt ppm 3626 <1 <1 Nitrogen, wt ppm 744 <1 <1 Aromatics, D6591 1 ring, wt % 29.1 55.7 30.5 2 rings, wt % 34.2 2.8 0.7 3+ rings, wt % 11.5 0.3 0.1 Yield, wt % FF <221 C. wt % 27.1 34.6 52.4 Yield Loss 10.3% 34.7%