Method for thermal ablation of pigging devices
10201815 ยท 2019-02-12
Inventors
- Mark S. Sankey (Washington, PA, US)
- James F. Stewart (Lafayette, AL, US)
- Andrew J. Pounds (Macon, GA, US)
- William Scott Stalnaker (Butler, GA, US)
- John R. Walker (Macon, GA, US)
- Dennis Aubrey Walker (Macon, GA, US)
- James R. Collins (Jackson's Gap, PA, US)
Cpc classification
F16L55/48
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L55/46
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L55/40
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
B02C19/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F16L55/46
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16L55/48
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
The present disclosure provides for a novel pig design and method of retrieval based on thermal ablation. The pig comprises an external layer and an inner core, where the inner core further comprises at least one incendiary charge comprising at least one exothermic material. When ignited via an ignition source, the incendiary charge releases the exothermic material into one or more thermal dispersion channels. The exothermic material melts the interior of these thermal dispersion channels thereby distributing the exothermic material throughout the pig device causing its destruction via thermal ablation. The destroyed pig can then be easily retrieved from its location in a pipe, as detected via radio signals, without the need for costly excavation of large sections of the pipe.
Claims
1. A method for thermally ablating a pig device located inside of a pipeline comprising: providing a pig device comprising an external layer and an inner core, wherein the inner core comprises one or more incendiary charges and wherein each incendiary charge further comprises one or more exothermic materials; igniting at least one ignition source, wherein each ignition source is operably coupled to at least one of the one or more incendiary charges to thereby release the exothermic material into one or more thermal dispersion channels; melting the interior of each thermal dispersion channel to thereby disperse the exothermic material through the inner core and thereby destroy the pig device, whereby igniting the ignition source is further achieved using at least one of a manual radio controlled switching mechanism and an automatic pressure sensing switching mechanism; and wherein destroying the pig device does not damage the surrounding pipeline.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising igniting the ignition source via a manual hardwired switching mechanism.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising utilizing at least one of a secondary ignition material and a pyrotechnic igniter to aid in the ignition of at least one of the one or more incendiary charges.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the exothermic material further comprises at least one of: barium nitrate, barium sulfate, iron (III) oxide, aluminum, and magnesium.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the exothermic material further comprises barium nitrate in amounts of about 22.5% to about 27.5% by mass; barium sulfate in amounts of about 25.3% to about 33.5% by mass; iron (III) oxide in amounts of about 14.8% to about 19.4% by mass; aluminum in amounts of about 12.8% to about 15.8% by mass; and magnesium in amounts of about 10.4% to about 13.5%.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising housing the exothermic material in at least one capsule and wherein the ignition of the incendiary charge causes the capsule to break and release the exothermic material.
7. A method for retrieving a pig device located inside of a pipeline which is destroyed using thermal ablation comprising: locating the pig device within a pipeline using radio signals detected from a radio receiver located within the pig device; igniting at least one ignition source, wherein each ignition source is operably coupled to an incendiary charge, to thereby release at least one exothermic material into one or more thermal dispersion channels, and whereby igniting the ignition source is further achieved using at least one of a manual radio controlled switching mechanism and an automatic pressure sensing switching mechanism; melting the interior of each thermal dispersion channel to thereby disperse the exothermic material through an inner core and thereby destroy the pig device, wherein destroying the pig device does not damage the surrounding pipeline; and retrieving the pig device at the detected location.
8. The method of claim 7 further comprising igniting the ignition source via at least one of: a manual hardwired switching mechanism, a manual radio controlled switching mechanism, and an automatic pressure sensing switching mechanism.
9. The method of claim 7 further comprising utilizing at least one of a secondary ignition material and a pyrotechnic igniter to aid in the ignition of the incendiary charge.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein the exothermic material further comprises at least one of: barium nitrate, barium sulfate, iron (III) oxide, aluminum, and magnesium.
11. The method of claim 7 wherein the exothermic material further comprises barium nitrate in amounts of about 22.5% to about 27.5% by mass; barium sulfate in amounts of about 25.3% to about 33.5% by mass; iron (III) oxide in amounts of about 14.8% to about 19.4% by mass; aluminum in amounts of about 12.8% to about 15.8% by mass; and magnesium in amounts of about 10.4% to about 13.5%.
12. The method of claim 7 further comprising housing the exothermic material in at least one capsule and wherein the ignition of the incendiary charge causes the capsule to break and release the exothermic material.
13. A method for thermally ablating a pig device located inside of a pipeline comprising: providing a pig device comprising an external layer and an inner core, wherein the inner core comprises one or more incendiary charges and wherein each incendiary charge further comprises one or more exothermic materials housed in one or more capsules, wherein the exothermic material is further configured to enable the incendiary charge to burn in water and further comprises at least one of: barium nitrate, barium sulfate, iron (III) oxide, aluminum, and magnesium; igniting at least one ignition source via at least one of: a manual radio controlled switching mechanism and an automatic pressure sensing switching mechanism, wherein each ignition source is operably coupled to an incendiary charge to thereby break the capsule housing the exothermic material and cause the exothermic material to be released into one or more thermal dispersion channels; and melting the interior of each thermal dispersion channel to thereby disperse the exothermic material through the inner core and thereby destroy the pig device wherein destroying the pig device does not damage the surrounding pipeline.
14. The method of claim 13 further comprising utilizing at least one of a secondary ignition material and a pyrotechnic igniter to aid in the ignition of the incendiary charge.
15. The method of claim 13 further comprising locating the pig device within a pipeline using radio signals detected from a radio receiver located within a pig device.
16. The method of claim 15 further comprising retrieving the pig device at the detected location.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide further understanding of the disclosure and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
(2) In the drawings:
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(25) Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
(26) The pig device of the present disclosure overcomes the limitations of the prior art by providing a novel design for easy location, destruction, and retrieval of the pig using thermal ablation techniques. Referring to
(27) Referring again to
(28) Ignition of the incendiary charge 120a may be achieved via one or more switching mechanisms 130. These switching mechanisms are known in the art and may include at least one of: a manual hardwired switching mechanism, a manual radio controlled switching mechanism, and an automatic pressure sensing switching mechanism. An exemplary design of the switching mechanism 130 is illustrated in more detail in
(29) A manual radio controlled switching mechanism 130b may be used to fire the pig device 100 via a remote control with a radio receiver mounted on board the pig. In one embodiment, the radio receiver may comprise an attendant 9 volt battery. Manual radio remote control firing alone is applicable to scenarios where adequate pressure control and regulation is not available or practical, or pipe distance is relatively short, allowing the operator the ability to walk the length of the pipe, generating multiple ignition requests.
(30) A pressure sensing switching mechanism 130c may be used to fire the pig device 100 by sensing when a set pressure has been reached. For example when the pressure on the pressure sensing switching mechanism 130c reaches a specified level due to a propulsion material added to the pipe, the switch will close an electrical contact and cause the incendiary charge 120a to fire. Igniters 127a-127e may be wired in parallel and operably coupled to the incendiary charge 120a and function to ignite the incendiary charge 120a. As can be seen in
(31)
(32) The present disclosure also provides for a method for thermally ablating a pig device, one embodiment of which is illustrated in
(33) In another embodiment, the present disclosure provides for a method for retrieving a pig device that has been ablated using the methods disclosed herein. Such a method 500, illustrated by
Examples
(34) The following example details experiments designed and implemented using the pig device and ablation methods of the present disclosure.
(35) Testing results show that the materials and devices consistent with commercial pipe pigging may be effectively ablated or destroyed in place within the pipe to consistently allow materials to be flushed from the pipe past or through significant obstructions using water as a motive force. Due to the combustion process of the methods of the present disclosure, water as the motive force is the only method which may be used in this method of thermal ablation as the water acts a heat sink for the process and effectively protects the pipe from damage. Testing shows that class 200 PVC pipe exhibited zero thickness loss, zero pipe wall distortion and a maximum external temperature of 8.7 F. over the inside of the pipe when surrounded by air. Testing shows pipe discoloration from products of combustion but no surface erosion due to the combustion process. The interior of a pipe after ablation of a pig device using the methods described herein in
(36)
(37) To deflagrate the pig via chemical means in an environment devoid of oxygen gas, such as a pipe, requires utilizing oxidizing agents to provide the necessary oxygen atoms to the system. In this specific case the exothermal reagents must continue to burn even when submerged in water. To accomplish this, a modified form of Ellern's foimulation number 36.sup.1 was used which utilizes magnesium and aluminum for fuels with barium sulfate and barium nitrate serving as the oxidizing agents.
(38) The formulation of Ellern was originally intended to be used in underwater flares and therefore holds potential for the present invention. It is, by mass, 16% magnesium, 12% aluminum, 32% barium nitrate, and 32% barium sulfate with an unspecified amount of manganese oxide mixed in with linseed oil to form a binder. With these mass ratios the barium sulfate and barium nitrate are together limiting reactants. Experiments have shown that use of Ellern's formulation will result in difficulty starting the main reaction. It was assumed that the manganese oxide was part of a thermitic reaction to help achieve the activation energy needed to initiate the main reaction. The manganese oxide was removed from the reaction and replaced with stoichiometric amounts of aluminum and iron (III) oxide added prior to combining with the binder. The Al/Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 reaction is also known to have a relatively low ignition point and be highly exothermic, thus helping to both start the reaction and sustain the high burn temperature needed underwater. The following amounts of each material were used in the present experimental design:
(39) TABLE-US-00001 Modified Formulation: (% composition by mass) Magnesium 12.1% Aluminum 15.2% Barium Nitrate 24.2% Barium Sulfate 30.3% Iron (III) Oxide 18.2%
(40) To prepare the exothermal mixture atomized aluminum and 325 mesh granular magnesium were combined with powdered forms of the oxidizers and homogenized. The homogenized granular powder was then compounded with pure, unboiled, linseed oil (=0.93 g/ml) using 6 ml of linseed oil per hundred grams of powder to form the material for the charge. The pig device and methods of the present disclosure are not limited to these concentrations. It is contemplated that the following workable ranges of materials may be used (% composition by mass): barium nitrate from about 22.5% to about 27.5%; barium sulfate from about 25.3% to about 33.5%; iron (III) sulfate from about 14.8% to about 19.4%; aluminum fro about 12.8% to about 15.8%; and magnesium from about 10.4% to about 13.5%.
(41) Approximately 210 grams of the exothermal material was packed into a hollow cardboard tube (1.75 diameter, 4.24 long). It is noted that other materials may be used to house the exothermal material including but not limited to glass and plastic. To help insure that the material ignited, a small disk (approximately thick and approximately 1 in diameter) of secondary ignition material (described herein) was placed on top of the exothermal material and a commercially available pyrotechnics igniter was then placed on top of the secondary ignition material. Cloth medical tape was used to securely fasten the igniter to the ignition material and to seal the end of the tube. It is contemplated that other types of tape or other mechanisms may be used so long as the mechanism securely fastens the igniter and the ignition material and to seal the end of the tube. The cloth tape was then used to secure the igniter wire to the long axis of the tube for stress relief and to ensure that the igniter was not pulled away from the ignition material. This process was repeated on the other end of the charge; each charge has two ignition points (See
(42) In early tests the commercially available igniters were not always capable of starting the reaction for the primary charge. A secondary ignition charge made of sucrose and potassium nitrate was added between the commercially available igniter and the main charge. The secondary charge was made by mixing 65% potassium nitrate with 35% sucrose; this is a mixture commonly found in model rocketry. The mixture was thoroughly homogenized and then carefully heated (to approximately 160 C.) until the sugar oxidized, turned light brown, and underwent a phase change to form a paste. The paste was then spread on wax paper at approximate thickness for cooling. Once re-crystallized, the material was broken into appropriate sized pieces and shaped for use as the secondary ignition material.
(43) There are five heat producing oxidation-reduction reactions used in this device. Reaction enthalpies at 298K were determined by using standard enthalpies of formation.sup.2 and the state law equation. In addition the heat liberated per gram of reactant was also computed.
10Al(s)+3Ba(NO.sub.3).sub.2(s).fwdarw.3BaO(s)+3N.sub.2(g)+5Al.sub.2O.sub.3(s)
H.sub.rxn=1684.47 kcal(1601 cal/g)(Rxn. 1)
16Al(s)+8BaSO.sub.4(s).fwdarw.8BaO(s)+S.sub.8(s)+8Al.sub.2O.sub.3(s)
H.sub.rxn=1458.32 kcal(634 cal/g)(Rxn. 2)
5Mg(s)+Ba(NO.sub.3).sub.2(s).fwdarw.BaO(s)+N.sub.2(g)+5MgO(s)
H.sub.rxn=615.54 kcal(1608 cal/g)(Rxn. 3)
24Mg(s)+8BaSO.sub.4(s).fwdarw.8BaO(s)+S.sub.8(s)+24MgO(s)
H.sub.rxn=1717.76 kcal(701 cal/g)(Rxn. 4)
2Al(s)+Fe.sub.2O.sub.3(s).fwdarw.Al.sub.2O.sub.3(s)+2Fe(s)
H.sub.rxn=202.59 kcal(948 cal/g)(Rxn. 5)
(44) These values are in rough agreement with values found in the literature which listed 1400 cal/g for reaction 1 and 900 cal/g for reaction 2..sup.3 Since the entire mixture is homogenized before adding the linseed oil binder it is assumed that the oxidizers are equally available to their pertinent reactions. As such one may further assume that half of each of the Ba(NO.sub.3).sub.2 and BaSO.sub.4 oxidizers goes to each of the fuels. In this formulation the oxidizers are the limiting reagents and can therefore be used to stoichiometrically compute the amount of fuel needed and the amount of energy produced by each reaction as seen in Table 1.
(45) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Assuming starting masses of 32 g Ba(NO.sub.3).sub.2, 40 g BaSO.sub.4, and 24 g of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3. Reaction Oxidizer Mass Stoichiometric Fuel Mass Energy from Rxn 1 16 g Ba(NO.sub.3).sub.2 5.51 g Al 34400 cal 2 20 g BaSO.sub.4 4.62 g Al 15600 cal 3 16 g Ba(NO.sub.3).sub.2 7.44 g Mg 37700 cal 4 20 g BaSO.sub.4 6.24 g Mg 18400 cal 5 24 g Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 8.11 g Al 30400 cal Total 127.9 g (132 g if including excess fuel) 136500 cal
(46) Using these totals the energy generated per gram of starting material is 1040 cal/g (or 4.13 btu/g). The PIG is made of a polyurethane core material. Polyurethane foams have approximate heats of combustion of 2400 cal/g (9.52 btu/g).sup.4. To completely destroy a pig device would therefore require using approximately 2.3 g of exothermic reactants for each gram of polyurethane to be deflagrated.
(47) A low density polyurethane pig device enclosing 210 grams of exothermal reactants described above was ignited while submerged in 20 gallons of water.
(48) There are numerous exothermal reagents and combinations of exothermal reagents that could be used to accomplish the pig deflagration. This application lays claim to the idea of using an exothermal agent to destroy the pig. In the chemical reactions described above the following oxidations take place: Mg.sup.0.fwdarw.Mg.sup.II and Al.sup.0.fwdarw.Al.sup.III. The reductions are N.sup.V.fwdarw.N.sup.0, S.sup.VI.fwdarw.S.sup.0, and Fe.sup.III.fwdarw.Fe.sup.0. Because of their location in the activity series with respect to magnesium and aluminum, several active metals (lithium, potassium, strontium, calcium, sodium) could replace barium as the cation in the oxidizing agents. Similarly, numerous polyatomic ions could potentially be used instead of nitrate and sulfate. The choices of barium nitrate, barium sulfate, and iron (iii) oxide for the prototype device described herein were primarily based on several factors including: (i) the similarity to Ellern's original formulation; (ii) their known characteristics within the pyrotechnics industry; (iii) being readily available from numerous manufacturers; and (iv) the high burning point and insolubility of barium sulfate in water.
(49) The present disclosure may be embodied in other specific fours without departing from the spirit or essential attributes of the disclosure. Accordingly, reference should be made to the appended claims, rather than the foregoing specification, as indicating the scope of the disclosufre. Although the foregoing description is directed to the embodiments of the disclosure, it is noted that other variations and modification will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure.
REFERENCES CITED
(50) 1. Ellern, Herbert. Military and Civilian Pyrotechnics. (New York: Chemical Publishing Company, 1968). 2. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 62nd ed. Robert C. Weast and Melvin J. Astle, eds. (Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1982). pg. D-52. 3. Engineering Design Handbook, Military Pyrotechnics Series. Part 1: Theory and Application. (Washington: U.S. Army Materiel Command, 1967) AMCP 706-185. 4. Krasney, John; Parker, William; Babrauskas, Vytenis. Fire Behavior of Upholstered Furniture and Mattresses. (Norwich: Noyes Publications, 2001); Sundstrm, B., Grauers, K., and Purser, D. Hazard Analysis in Room, Ch. 3, Fire Safety of Upholstered FurnitureThe Full Report of the European Commission Research Program CBUF. B. Sundstrm, ed. (London: Interscience Communications Ltd., 1995)