DOUBLE-SIDED FRICTION STIR WELDING METHOD, METHODS FOR PRODUCING COLD-ROLLED STEEL STRIP AND COATED STEEL STRIP, DOUBLE-SIDED FRICTION STIR WELDING APPARATUS, AND FACILITIES FOR PRODUCING COLD-ROLLED STEEL STRIP AND COATED STEEL STRIP
20220371119 · 2022-11-24
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B23K20/1225
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K20/123
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K20/122
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K20/1255
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A double-sided friction stir welding method, methods for producing a cold-rolled steel strip and a coated steel strip, a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus, and facilities for producing a cold-rolled steel strip and a coated steel strip. The double-sided friction stir welding method includes pressing two rotating tools, which are disposed on a first surface and a second surface of a butt portion or overlap portion of the steel strips, against the butt portion or overlap portion of steel strips and moving the rotating tools in the welding direction while rotating the rotating tools in opposite directions to each other, so that an unwelded portion of the steel strips is softened by frictional heat generated between the rotating tools and the unwelded portion of the steel strips, and the softened portion is stirred with the rotating tools to generate plastic flow so as to weld the steel strips together.
Claims
1. A double-sided friction stir welding method comprising, in butt welding or lap welding between a tailing end of a preceding steel strip and a leading end of a following steel strip: pressing two rotating tools, which are disposed on a first surface and a second surface of a butt portion or overlap portion of the steel strips, against the butt portion or overlap portion of the steel strips; and moving the rotating tools in a welding direction while rotating the rotating tools in opposite directions to each other, so that an unwelded portion of the steel strips is softened by frictional heat generated between the rotating tools and the unwelded portion of the steel strips, and the softened portion is stirred with the rotating tools to generate plastic flow so as to weld the steel strips together, wherein the two rotating tools each have an end portion formed to have a shape of one of a circular planar surface, a circular convex curved surface, and a circular concave curved surface, and the end portions are each made of a material harder than the steel strips.
2. The double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 1, wherein the end portions each have a spiral stepped portion extending in a direction opposite to a respective rotation direction.
3. The double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 2, wherein an inclination angle α (°) at which rotation axes of the two rotating tools are inclined backward in the welding direction with respect to a normal to a surface of the unwelded portion of the steel strips, a diameter D (mm) of each end portion, and a distance G (mm) between the end portions of the two rotating tools satisfy formula (1) and formula (2):
0≤α≤3 (1)
0.25×t−0.2×D×sin α≤G≤0.8×t−0.2×D×sin α (2) where t represents a thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or a total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
4. The double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 2, wherein a diameter D (mm) of each end portion satisfies formula (3):
4×t≤D≤20×t (3) where t represents a thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or a total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
5. The double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 19, wherein, when a height of the convex curved surface of each end portion is denoted by dv (mm), a diameter D (mm) of each end portion and the height dv of the convex curved surface satisfy formula (4):
dv/D≤0.06 (4).
6. The double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 19, wherein, when a depth of the concave curved surface of each end portion is denoted by dc (mm), a diameter D (mm) of each end portion and the depth dc of the concave curved surface satisfy formula (5):
dc/D≤0.03 (5).
7. A method for producing a cold-rolled steel strip, the method comprising, after welding between the tailing end of the preceding steel strip and the leading end of the following steel strip using the double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 1, performing cold rolling or performing cold rolling after pickling.
8. The method for producing a cold-rolled steel strip according to claim 7, further comprising performing annealing after the cold rolling.
9. A method for producing a coated steel strip, the method comprising, after welding between the tailing end of the preceding steel strip and the leading end of the following steel strip using the double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 1, performing cold rolling or performing cold rolling after pickling, and then performing annealing and coating.
10. A double-sided friction stir welding apparatus comprising: two rotating tools that oppose each other across an unwelded portion of two steel strips; and a controlling device that controls operation of the two rotating tools, wherein the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus welds the steel strips together as the two rotating tools move in a welding direction while pressing the unwelded portion of butting or overlapped steel strips and rotating in opposite directions to each other, the two rotating tools each have an end portion formed to have a shape of one of a circular planar surface, a circular convex curved surface, and a circular concave curved surface, and the end portions are each made of a material harder than the steel strips.
11. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the end portions each have a spiral stepped portion extending in a direction opposite to a respective rotation direction.
12. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the controlling device performs control in such a manner that an inclination angle α (°) at which rotation axes of the two rotating tools are inclined backward in the welding direction with respect to a normal to a surface of the unwelded portion of the steel strips, a diameter D (mm) of each end portion, and a distance G (mm) between the end portions of the two rotating tools satisfy formula (1) and formula (2):
0≤α≤3 (1)
0.25×t−0.2×D×sin α≤G≤0.8×t−0.2×D×sin α (2) where t represents a thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or a total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
13. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 11, wherein a diameter D (mm) of each end portion satisfies formula (3):
4×t≤D≤20×t (3) where t represents a thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or a total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
14. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 20, wherein, when a height of the convex curved surface of each end portion is denoted by dv (mm), a diameter D (mm) of each end portion and the height dv of the convex curved surface satisfy formula (4):
dv/D≤0.06 (4).
15. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 20, wherein, when a depth of the concave curved surface of each end portion is denoted by dc (mm), a diameter D (mm) of each end portion and the depth dc of the concave curved surface satisfy formula (5):
dc/D≤0.03 (5).
16. A facility for producing a cold-rolled steel strip, the facility comprising: the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 10; and a cold rolling unit that cold-rolls the welded steel strips, or a cold rolling unit that cold-rolls the welded steel strips after pickling in a pickling unit.
17. The facility for producing a cold-rolled steel strip according to claim 16, further comprising an annealing unit that anneals the cold-rolled steel strips.
18. A facility for producing a coated steel strip, the facility comprising: the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 10; a cold rolling unit that cold-rolls the welded steel strips, or a cold rolling unit that cold-rolls the welded steel strips after pickling in a pickling unit; an annealing unit that anneals the cold-rolled steel strips; and a coating unit that coats the annealed steel strips.
19. The double-sided friction stir welding method according to claim 3, wherein a diameter D (mm) of each end portion satisfies formula (3):
4×t≤D≤20×t (3) where t represents a thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or a total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
20. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to claim 12, wherein a diameter D (mm) of each end portion satisfies formula (3):
4×t≤D≤20×t Formula (3) where t represents a thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or a total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0059] The disclosed embodiments will be described below with reference to the drawings. The disclosure is not intended to be limited to the following specific embodiments.
[0060] First, a double-sided friction stir welding method and a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus according to the disclosed embodiments will be described.
[0061] A double-sided friction stir welding method according to the disclosed embodiments includes, in butt welding or lap welding between the tailing end of a preceding steel strip and the leading end of a following steel strip, pressing two rotating tools, which are disposed on a first surface and a second surface of a butt portion or overlap portion of the steel strips, against the butt portion or overlap portion of the steel strips and moving the rotating tools in the welding direction while rotating the rotating tools in opposite directions to each other. Then, an unwelded portion of the steel strips is softened by frictional heat generated between the rotating tools and the unwelded portion of the steel strips, and the softened portion is stirred with the rotating tools to generate plastic flow, whereby the steel strips are welded together.
[0062] As illustrated in
[0063] The controlling device controls, for example, the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8, the distance G between an end portion of the rotating tool 1 and an end portion of the rotating tool. 8, the welding speed, the rotational speed and rotation direction of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8, as described below.
[0064] The rotating tools 1 and 8 (the rotating tool that is disposed on the front surfaces of steel strips may hereinafter be referred to as a front-surface-side rotating tool 1, and the rotating tool that is disposed on the rear surfaces of the steel strips may hereinafter be referred to as a rear-surface-side rotating tool 8) are respectively disposed on first surfaces (front surfaces) and second surfaces (rear surfaces) of the steel strips (workpieces, or to-be-welded members) 4. The two steel strips 4 are arranged parallel to a joint center line 7 illustrated in
[0065] As illustrated in
[0066] If the rotating tool 1 on the front surface and the rotating tool 8 on the rear surface, which oppose each other, rotate in the same direction, the speed of one of the rotating tools relative to the other rotating tool approaches zero. As a result, as the plastic flow of the steel strips 4 becomes more uniform, the plastic deformation decreases, and the plastic deformation of the material generates less heat, which makes it difficult to achieve a favorable welded state. In order to provide a uniform temperature rise and a uniform shear stress in the thickness direction of the steel strips sufficient to achieve a favorable welded state, it is effective to set the rotation directions of the rotating tool 1 on the front surface (first surface) and the rotating tool 8 on the rear surface (second surface), which oppose each other, to be opposite to each other.
[0067] The type of welding of steel strips will now be described. Preferred examples of the type of welding of steel strips include butt welding and lap welding. As illustrated in
[0068] The rotating tools used in double-sided friction stir welding of the disclosed embodiments will next be described.
[0069] The rotating tool 20 including a probe (pin) 21, which is an example of the related art, will now be described with reference to
[0070] As illustrated in
[0071] The probe 21 has a function of improving stirring performance in the vicinity of center portions of the steel strips in the thickness direction by entering the softened portion of the steel strips further toward the center in the thickness direction during welding. However, there is a problem in that a portion of the probe 21 that is positioned nearer to its end in the thickness direction (nearer to the center of the thickness) receives a stress greater than the stress received by the shoulder portion 22. Consequently, there is another problem in that the rotating tool needs to be repaired due to damage and wear as described above.
[0072] The inventors have carried out intensive studies. As a result, it has been found that a double-sided friction stir welding method using rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding that are capable of suppressing occurrence of defects in a welded portion and increasing the welding speed without having a probe which particularly easily breaks and wears due to a greater stress applied thereto.
[0073] As illustrated in
[0074] The end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 (an end portion 2 of the front-surface-side rotating tool and an end portion 9 of the rear-surface-side rotating tool, which are illustrated in
[0075] For hardness comparison, test methods for Vickers hardness at elevated temperatures may be used. The rotating tools 1 and 8 may be formed such that only their end portions have the above-mentioned hardness or such that the entire rotating tools 1 and 8 have the above-mentioned hardness.
[0076] In addition to the above-described configuration, the end portion 11 of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 preferably has spiral (helical) stepped portions 12 in the disclosed embodiments. Spirals (helixes) forming the stepped portion 12 of the rotating tool 1 preferably run in a direction opposite to the rotation direction of the rotating tool 1, and spirals (helixes) forming the stepped portion 12 of the rotating tool 8 preferably run in a direction opposite to the rotation direction of the rotating tool 8. The number of spirals forming the stepped portions 12 is preferably 1 or more.
[0077] In the case of one or more spirals, the curves (radial curves) are formed to extend radially from the center of the end portion 11 or the circumference of a circular blank region at the center to the outer circumference of the end portion 11.
[0078] If the number of spirals forming the stepped portions 12 is greater than 6, the effect of improving material flow decreases, and, in addition, the end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 may easily break due to its complex shape. Thus, the number of spirals forming the stepped portions 12 is preferably 6 or less. In the examples illustrated in
[0079] To prevent breakage of the end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 while improving material flow, the number of spirals forming the stepped portions 12 can be adjusted according to the diameter of each of the end portions 11. Specifically, the number of spirals preferably increases as the diameter of each of the end portions 11 increases, and the number of spirals preferably decreases as the diameter of each of the end portions 11 decreases.
[0080] Specifically, the number of spirals is preferably 2 or less when the diameter of the end portion is smaller than 6 mm, and the number of spirals is preferably 3 to 6 when the diameter of the end portion is 6 mm or larger.
[0081] How to draw the spirals will, be described by using the examples illustrated in
[0082] In
As illustrated in
[0083]
As illustrated in
[0084] In the case where the number of spirals is 1, the spiral may be drawn by any one of the methods illustrated in
[0085] The stepped portions 12 are each recessed from the other surface (planar surface or curved surface) of the corresponding end portion. Such recessed stepped portions 12 cause a metal material softened by frictional heat to flow from the outside toward the inside of the rotating tools 1 and 8 when the rotating tools 1 and 8 press and stir the steel strips 4. The rotating tools 1 and 8 can accordingly prevent the metal material from flowing out of the pressed portion. This can promote plastic flow of the pressed portion and can also prevent a welded portion from having a smaller thickness than a base material, forming a smooth and burr-free surface of the welded portion. The above advantageous effects of the stepped portions are obtained by forming the spiral stepped portions 12 such that the stepped portions 12 extend in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of the rotating tools 1 and 8. The rotating tools according to the disclosed embodiments preferably have no spiral stepped portion at the center of its end portion, or preferably have, at the center of its end portion, no spiral stepped portion extending in the direction opposite to the rotation direction.
[0086] The advantageous effects similar to those described above can be obtained by providing one or more spiral stepped portions 12 extending in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of the corresponding rotating tool.
[0087] The stepped portions 12 will now be described more specifically with reference to
[0088] As illustrated in
[0089] As illustrated in
[0090] Specific examples of the stepped portions 12 include step portions 12b illustrated in
[0091] Although not illustrated, when the rotating tool having an end portion with a concave curved shape includes the step portions 12b on the concave curved surface, steps may be formed such that the heights of the steps gradually decrease from the circumference of the circle toward the center of the circle according to the concave curved surface.
[0092] In the example illustrated in
[0093] Although not illustrated, when the rotating tool 1 having the end portion 11 with the concave curved shape 11c or the planar shape 11a includes the groove portions 12c on the concave curved surface or the planar surface, grooves having a substantially U-shaped cross section may be formed similarly.
[0094] In addition to the above-described configuration, the diameter D (mm) of the end portion 11 of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 preferably satisfies the relationship represented by the following formula (3) in the disclosed embodiments:
4×t≤D≤20×t Formula (3)
where t represents the thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of steel strips, or the total thickness (mm) of steel strips for lap welding of steel strips.
[0095] With the diameter of each end portion 11 controlled, the rotating tools 1 and 8 can provide a temperature rise and a shear stress uniformly and effectively in the thickness direction of the steel strips 4. The diameter D of the end portion 11 of the rotating tool 1 is preferably controlled according to the thickness of each of the steel strips 4 (the total thickness t of the steel strips 4 for lap welding). In other words, it is effective to set the diameter D (mm) of the end portion 11 of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 in accordance with the formula (3):
4×t≤D≤20×t.
[0096] If the diameter D (mm) is less than 4×t (mm), uniform plastic flow in the thickness direction may not be effectively obtained. If the diameter D (mm) is greater than 20×t (mm), a plastic flow region is unnecessarily widened, and an excessive load is applied to the apparatus, which is not preferable. The diameter D is preferably 5.5×t (mm) or greater and preferably 14×t (mm) or less.
[0097] As described above, the shape of the rotating tool according to the disclosed embodiments can be simplified by eliminating a probe required for a rotating tool of the related art. The rotating tool can have higher durability. The rotating tool can be produced with fewer steps and lower costs.
[0098] According to the double-sided friction stir welding method of the disclosed embodiments using the rotating tools, a sufficient temperature rise and a sufficient shear stress during welding can be uniformly provided in the thickness direction. In other words, a uniform temperature rise in the thickness direction can be more effectively achieved by promoting plastic flow by a welding method using the rotating tools of the disclosed embodiments having the above configuration compared with a uniform temperature rise that can be obtained by double-sided friction stir welding of the related art. Thus, part of the welded portion is not exposed to an excessive temperature rise for completing welding of steel strips, which prevents liquation embrittlement caused by liquation of the segregation area due to exposure to high temperature, and hydrogen embrittlement caused by increased hydrogen intrusion into steel due to high temperature.
[0099] Next, the rotating tools according to the first to third embodiments will be described in detail below. It is noted that only the front-surface-side rotating tool 1 is illustrated in
First Embodiment
[0100] As illustrated in
[0101] The view at the top of
Second Embodiment
[0102] As illustrated in
[0103] In the case where the end of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is formed of the end portion 11 having the convex curved shape 11b, the rotating tools preferably satisfy the relationship represented by the following formula (4), where dv represents the height (mm) of the convex curved surface (convex surface), and D represents the diameter (mm) of the end portion of the rotating tool:
dv/D≤0.06 Formula (4)
[0104] When the end portions come into contact with the steel strips so as to satisfy the formula (4) (i.e., the value of dv/D is 0.06 or smaller), pressure can be effectively applied to the flowing portion. As a result, plastic flow sufficient for welding can be generated by the rotation of the rotating tools. If the ratio dv/D exceeds the range of the formula (4) (i.e., the value of dv/D exceeds 0.06), the front and rear surfaces of the welded portion become notably recessed, and the thickness of the welded portion becomes notably smaller than the thickness of each of the steel strips. It may be thus difficult to ensure the joint strength, which is not preferable. To effectively apply pressure to the flowing portion, the lower limit of the value of dv/D is preferably 0.01 or larger.
Third Embodiment
[0105] As illustrated in
[0106] In the case where the end portion of the rotating tool is formed of the end portion 11 having the concave curved shape, the rotating tool preferably satisfies the relationship represented by the following formula (5), where dc represents the depth (mm) of the concave curved surface (concave surface), and D represents the diameter (mm) of the end portion of the rotating tool:
dc/D≤0.03 Formula (5)
[0107] When the end portions come into contact with the steel strips so as to satisfy the formula (5) (i.e., the value of dc/D is 0.03 or smaller), the concave curved surfaces of the end portions are surrounded by the softened metal to apply a uniform pressure to the flowing portion. As a result, plastic flow sufficient for welding can be generated by the rotation of the rotating tools. If the ratio dc/D exceeds the range of the formula (5) (i.e., the value of dc/D exceeds 0.03), it is difficult to apply a uniform pressure to the flowing portion described above, and it may be difficult to ensure plastic flow sufficient for welding, which is not preferable. To apply a uniform pressure to the flowing portion, the lower limit of the value of dc/D is preferably 0.01 or larger.
[0108] The shapes of base portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8, the base portions being opposite to the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8, are not particularly limited as long as the base portions can be attached to a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus known in the related art.
[0109] Next, a preferred example of a double-sided friction stir welding method using the rotating tools 1 and 8 according to the disclosed embodiments will be described.
[0110] In the double-sided friction stir welding method, more favorable advantageous effects related to improvement in the durability of the rotating tools, suppression of occurrence of joint defects, and an increase in welding speed can be obtained by optimizing the conditions of the following various parameters.
[0111] In the disclosed embodiments, the inclination angle α (°) at which the rotation axes of the two rotating tools 1 and 8 are inclined in the welding direction with respect to the normal to the surface of the unwelded portion of the steel strips, the diameter D (u) of the end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8, and the distance G (mm) between the end portions of the two rotating tools 1 and 8 are preferably controlled so as to satisfy formula (1) and formula (2) below.
(1)Inclination Angle α(°) of Rotating Tools:0≤α≤3 Formula (1)
[0112]
[0113] As illustrated in
[0114] The rotating tools 1 and 8 need to be made of a material that is harder than the steel strips 4 and may be made of, for example, a material having poor toughness, such as a ceramic. In this case, application of a force to the rotating tools 1 and 8 in the bending direction may locally concentrate stress and in turn results in breakage of the rotating tools 1 and 8. To avoid this situation, the rotation axes 3 and 10 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 are inclined at a predetermined angle (α°) as described above, so that the load applied to the rotating tools 1 and 8 can be received as force components that cause compression in the axial direction to reduce the force in the bending direction. As a result, the durability of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 can be further improved.
[0115] The above-mentioned advantageous effects are obtained at an inclination angle α of 0 degrees or greater. If the inclination angle α exceeds 3°, the front and rear surfaces of the welded portion may become recessed, and this may adversely affect the joint strength. The inclination angle of the rotation axis of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is preferably 0≤α≤3.
[0116] The inclination angle α is more preferably 1° or greater and more preferably 2° or less.
(2) Distance G (mm) Between End Portions of Two Rotating Tools 1 and 8:0.25×t−0.2×D×sin α≤G≤0.8×t−0.2×D×sin α Formula (2)
[0117] where t: the thickness (mm) of the unwelded portion of the steel strip 4, D: the diameter (mm) of the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8, and α: the inclination angle (°) of the rotating tools 1 and 8. Here, t represents the thickness (mm) of each steel strip for butt welding of the steel strips, or the total thickness (mm) of the overlapped steel strips for lap welding of the steel strips.
[0118] In double-sided friction stir welding, it is important to control the distance G between the end portions of the opposing rotating tools 1 and 8 in order to uniformly provide a sufficient temperature rise and a sufficient shear stress in the thickness direction during welding. Specifically, the distance G between the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is preferably controlled (adjusted) within the range of the formula (2) by using the thickness t of the unwelded portion of the steel strips 4, the diameter D of the end portion of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8, and the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8.
[0119] For butt welding illustrated in
[0120] In the case where the rotating tools 1 and 8 are not inclined (i.e., the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is 0°), the lower limit and the upper limit of the distance G between the end portions (reference signs 2 and 9 in
[0121] In the case where the rotating tools 1 and 8 are inclined (i.e., the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is 0<α≤3), or in the case where the diameter D of the end portion of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is increased in order to increase the contact area between the end portion of the rotating tool 1 and the front surfaces of the steel strips 4 and the contact area between the end portion of the rotating tool 8 and the rear surfaces of the steel strips 4, the distance G between the rotating tools 1 and 8 needs to be set smaller. In this case, as expressed by the formula (2), the lower limit of G may be obtained by subtracting 0.2×D×sin α from 0.25×t and the upper limit of G may be obtained by subtracting 0.2×D×sin α from 0.8×t.
[0122] As described above, when the distance G between the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is controlled in the range of the formula (2), the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 opposing each other are pressed against the front and rear surfaces of the steel strips 4 with a sufficient load, and heat generation and plastic flow in the welded portion are sufficiently promoted. As a result, plastic flow is promoted uniformly in the thickness direction, and a joint (welded portion) in a favorable state can be obtained. If the value of the distance G exceeds the upper limit in the formula (2), the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 cannot press the front and rear surfaces of the steel strips 4 (workpieces) with a sufficient load, and the above-mentioned advantageous effects may not be obtained. If the value of the distance G falls below the lower limit in the formula (2), the front and rear surfaces of the welded portion may become recessed, and this may adversely affect the joint strength.
[0123] The value of the distance G is preferably (0.4× t−0.2× D× sin α) or greater and preferably (0.7× t−0.2× D× sin α) or less.
[0124] As illustrated in
[0125] The other welding conditions may be set in a conventional manner. For example, the rotational speed of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is preferably 100 to 5,000 r/min and more preferably 500 to 3,000 r/min in the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus and the double-sided friction stir welding method according to the disclosed embodiments. At a rotational speed in these ranges, deterioration in mechanical properties due to excessive heat input can be suppressed while a favorable surface profile is maintained. The welding speed is preferably 1,000 mm/min or higher and is more preferably increased to 2,000 mm/min or higher.
[0126] For welding of steel strips in-process, the welding method of the disclosed embodiments can be preferably used for welding common structural steels and carbon steels, such as rolled steels for welded structure in Japanese industrial standards of (JIS) G 3106 and carbon steels for machine structural use in JIS G 4051. The welding method of the disclosed embodiments can be favorably used for high-strength structural steels having a tensile strength of 800 MPa or greater. Even in this case, the strength of the welded portion is 85% or more, preferably 90% or more, and more preferably 95% or more of the tensile strength of a steel sheet (base material).
[0127] The welded portion of steel strips undergoes bending or compressive deformation during the production process. Erichsen test is used to determine whether the welded portion is properly welded and resistant to such deformation. In Erichsen test, the welded portion is clamped in a die, and a semi-spherical punch is pressed into the welded portion. Erichsen test is conducted to measure the indentation depth until cracking occurs, and the indentation depth is used to evaluate the performance of the welded portion.
[0128] Double-sided friction stir welding of steel strips uses a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus including two rotating tools 1 and 8 of the disclosed embodiments, a holding device 13 (described in
[0129] According to the rotating tools 1 and 8 of the disclosed embodiments, the durability of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 can be improved as described above. When the end portions of the rotating tools each have the above-mentioned shape, and the opposing rotating tools 1 and 8 rotate in opposite directions to each other, the steel strips undergo a sufficient temperature rise and a sufficient shear stress during welding. As a result, occurrence of defects in the welded portion can be suppressed, and the welding speed can be increased.
[0130] Next, methods and facilities for producing a cold-rolled steel strip and a coated steel strip according to the disclosed embodiments will be described. The double-sided friction stir welding apparatus (double-sided friction stir welding method) according to the disclosed embodiments described above can be used in a facility for producing a cold-rolled steel strip (a method for producing a cold-rolled steel strip) and a facility for producing a coated steel strip (a method for producing a coated steel strip).
[0131] In a method for producing a cold-rolled steel strip of the related art, a coil welded portion may break in production lines. This has recently become more noticeable as a problem to be solved in the production of high strength cold rolled steel sheets. The application of the technique of double-sided friction stir welding according to the disclosed embodiments described above to production of cold-rolled steel strips or the like can prevent breakage and embrittlement of welded portions of the obtained cold-rolled steel strips or the like to improve material properties, solving the problem of the related art described above.
[0132] The facility for producing a cold-rolled steel strip according to the disclosed embodiments includes at least the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus described above and, as necessary, a pickling unit, a cold rolling unit, and an annealing unit. The facility for producing a coated steel strip according to the disclosed embodiments further includes a coating unit in addition to these units.
[0133] The method for producing a cold-rolled steel strip according to the disclosed embodiments involves welding the tailing end of a preceding steel strip and the leading end of a following steel strip by double-sided friction stir welding described above and then cold rolling the welded steel strips by using the cold rolling unit (cold rolling process) to produce cold-rolled steel strips. Cold rolling may be preceded by pickling using the pickling unit as necessary. Cold rolling may be followed by annealing the cold-rolled steel strips (annealing process) using the annealing unit as necessary.
[0134] In the method for producing a coated steel strip according to the disclosed embodiments, the cold-rolled steel strips obtained after the cold rolling process and the annealing process are subjected to a coating process using a coating unit to produce coated steel strips.
[0135] The use of the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus (and the double-sided friction stir welding method) according to the disclosed embodiments in production of cold-rolled steel strips and coated steel strips can reduce defects in the welded portion of the obtained cold-rolled steel strips and the produced coated steel strips and can ensure sufficient joint strength.
EXAMPLES
[0136] The operations and effects of the disclosed embodiments will be described below by using Examples. The disclosed embodiments are not limited to the Examples below.
[0137] Double-sided friction stir welding was conducted by using steel sheets having the thickness, the chemical composition, the tensile strength, and the Vickers hardness described in Table 1. In Examples, lap welding was performed on some of the steel sheets, and butt welding was performed on the rest of the steel sheets.
[0138] For butt welding, two steel sheets of the same type were arranged side by side to form joint butt surfaces having no groove angle, which is so-called square groove, and having a surface condition similar to that of a milled surface. The rotating tools were pressed against the butt portion from both a first surface (front surface) and a second surface (rear surface) and moved in the welding direction, whereby the steel sheets were welded together.
[0139] For lap welding, two steel sheets of the same type were arranged so as to overlap each other, and the rotating tools were pressed against the overlap portion of the steel sheets from both a first surface (front surface) and a second surface (rear surface), whereby the steel sheets were welded together. The welding length for one process was 0.5 m.
[0140] For both butt welding and lap welding, two rotating tools were rotated in opposite directions to each other during welding. In other words, the rotating tools rotate in the same direction when the end portions of the tools are viewed from the front. The welding conditions of friction stir welding are described in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. In the welding, eight types of rotating tools having the cross-sectional dimensions and the shapes illustrated in
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Thickness Chemical Composition (mass %) Number (mm) C Si Mn P S Tensile Strength (MPa) Vickers Hardness 1 1.6 0.3 0.21 0.69 0.012 0.003 1010 337 2 2.4 0.16 0.07 0.69 0.016 0.009 425 142 3 1.2 0.3 0.21 0.69 0.012 0.003 1012 339
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2-1 Front and rear surface side welding tools Diameter D of Height dv of Depth dc of Vickers end portions of convex surfaces concave surfaces Thickness hardness front and rear of front and rear of front and rear of sample Type of rotating surface side surface side surface side Condition Sample steel sheet of Shape tool rotating tools rotating tools rotating tools of stepped steel sheet (mm) joint (*1) material (mm) (mm) (mm) dv/D dc/D portions Example 1 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(b) 1090 8 — 0.2 — 0.025 Stepwise Example 2 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(b) 1090 13 — 0.3 — 0.023 Groove- shaped Example 3 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(b) 1090 30 — 0.3 — 0.010 Groove- shaped Example 4 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(a) 1090 8 — 0.2 — 0.025 — Example 5 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(a) 1090 13 — 0.3 — 0.023 — Example 6 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(a) 1090 30 — 0.3 — 0.010 — Example 7 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 5(b) 1090 13 — — — — Stepwise Example 8 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 5(b) 1090 20 — — — — Groove- shaped Example 9 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 5(b) 1090 40 — — — — Groove- shaped Example 10 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 5(a) 1090 8 — — — — — Example 11 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 5(a) 1090 13 — — — — — Example 12 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 5(a) 1090 30 — — — — — Example 13 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 6(b) 1090 8 0.4 — 0.050 — Groove- shaped Example 14 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 6(b) 1090 13 0.5 — 0.038 — Stepwise Example 15 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 6(b) 1090 30 0.5 — 0.017 — Stepwise Example 16 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 6(a) 1090 13 0.5 — 0.038 — — Example 17 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 6(a) 1090 20 0.5 — 0.025 — — Example 18 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 6(a) 1090 40 0.5 — 0.013 — — Example 19 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(b) 1090 12 — 0.4 — 0.033 Stepwise Arrangement of rotating tools Inclination Distance G angle α of between end Tool rotation Rotational speed RS front and rear portions of front direction when end of rotating tools surface side and rear surface portions of rotating Front Rear Welding rotating tools side rotating tools are viewed surface side surface side speed TS (°) tools (mm) from front (time/min) (time/min) (m/min) Example 1 0 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.2 Example 2 1.5 1.00 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 2.0 Example 3 1.5 1.00 Counterclockwise 800 800 1.2 Example 4 0 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.2 Example 5 1.5 1.00 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 2.0 Example 6 1.5 1.00 Counterclockwise 800 800 1.2 Example 7 0 1.40 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 8 1.5 1.40 Counterclockwise 2500 2500 1.5 Example 9 1.5 1.40 Counterclockwise 1500 1500 1.0 Example 10 0 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 11 1.5 1.00 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 1.5 Example 12 1.5 1.00 Counterclockwise 800 800 1.0 Example 13 0 0.60 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.2 Example 14 0 0.60 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 2.0 Example 15 0 0.60 Counterclockwise 800 800 1.2 Example 16 0 1.40 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 17 0 1.40 Counterclockwise 2500 2500 1.2 Example 18 0 1.40 Counterclockwise 1500 1500 1.0 Example 19 1.5 0.80 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 2.0 (*1): The rotating tool in FIG. 4(a) has a pin, a shoulder diameter of 12 mm, and a pin length of 0.5 mm, and the rotating tool in FIG. 4(b) has a pin, a shoulder diameter of 20 mm, and a pin length of 0.7 mm. The rotating tool in FIG. 5(a) has no pin, an end portion with a planar shape, and no spiral stepped portion, and the rotating tool in FIG. 5(b) has no pin, an end portion with a planar shape, and a spiral stepped portion (clockwise direction). The rotating tool in FIG. 6(a) has no pin, an end portion with a convex curved shape, and no spiral stepped portion, and the rotating tool in FIG. 6(b) has no pin, an end portion with a convex curved shape, and a spiral stepped portion (clockwise direction). The rotating tool in FIG. 7(a) has no pin, an end portion with a concave curved shape, and no spiral stepped portion, and the rotating tool in FIG. 7(b) has no pin, an end portion with a concave curved shape, and a spiral stepped portion (clockwise direction).
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2-2 Front and rear surface side welding tools Diameter D of Height dv of Depth dc of Vickers end portions of convex surfaces concave surfaces Thickness hardness front and rear of front and rear of front and rear Condition of sample Type of rotating surface side surface side surface side of Sample steel sheet of Shape tool rotating tools rotating tools rotating tools stepped steel sheet (mm) joint (*1) material (mm) (mm) (mm) dv/D dc/D portions Example 20 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 5(b) 1090 6 — — — — Groove- shaped Example 21 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 6(b) 1090 9 0.6 — 0.067 — Stepwise Example 22 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(a) 1090 12 — 0.4 — 0.033 — Example 23 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 5(a) 1090 6 — — — — — Example 24 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 6(a) 1090 9 0.6 — 0.067 — — Example 25 3 1.2 Lap FIG. 5(b) 1090 20 — — — — Groove- shaped Example 26 3 1.2 Lap FIG. 5(b) 1090 40 — — — — Groove- shaped Example 27 3 1.2 Lap FIG. 6(a) 1090 13 0.5 — 0.038 — — Comparative 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 7(b) 1090 8 — 0.2 — 0.025 Stepwise Example 1 Comparative 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 5(b) 1090 13 — — — — Stepwise Example 2 Comparative 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 6(b) 1090 30 0.5 — 0.017 — Stepwise Example 3 Comparative 3 1.2 Lap FIG. 5(b) 1090 20 — — — — Groove- Example 4 shaped Comparative 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 4(a) 1090 13 — 0.3 — 0.023 — Example 5 Comparative 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 4(a) 1090 13 — 0.3 — 0.023 — Example 6 Comparative 1 1.6 Butt FIG. 4(a) 1090 13 — 0.3 — 0.023 — Example 7 Comparative 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 4(b) 1090 20 — 0.3 — 0.015 — Example 8 Comparative 2 2.4 Butt FIG. 4(b) 1090 20 — 0.3 — 0.015 — Example 9 Comparative 3 1.2 Lap FIG. 4(b) 1090 20 — 0.3 — 0.015 — Example 10 Arrangement of rotating tools Inclination Distance G angle α of between end Tool rotation Rotational speed RS front and rear portions of front direction when of rotating tools surface side and rear surface end portions of Front Rear Welding rotating tools side rotating rotating tools are surface side surface side speed TS (°)) tools (mm) viewed from front (time/min) (time/min) (m/min) Example 20 1.5 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 21 0 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 22 1.5 0.80 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 2.0 Example 23 1.5 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 24 0 0.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 25 1.5 1.40 Counterclockwise 2500 2500 1.5 Example 26 1.5 1.40 Counterclockwise 1500 1500 1.0 Example 27 0 1.40 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Comparative 0 0.80 Clockwise 3000 3000 1.2 Example 1 Comparative 0 1.40 Clockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 2 Comparative 0 0.60 Clockwise 800 800 1.2 Example 3 Comparative 1.5 1.40 Clockwise 2500 2500 1.5 Example 4 Comparative 0 1.30 Counterclockwise 800 800 1.0 Example 5 Comparative 1.5 1.20 Counterclockwise 1300 1300 2.0 Example 6 Comparative 3 1.30 Counterclockwise 800 800 1.0 Example 7 Comparative 1.5 1.80 Counterclockwise 3000 3000 1.0 Example 8 Comparative 0.0 2.00 Counterclockwise 1600 1600 1.0 Example 9 Comparative 0.0 2.00 Counterclockwise 1600 1600 1.0 Example 10 (*1): The rotating tool in FIG. 4(a) has a pin, a shoulder diameter of 12 mm, and a pin length of 0.5 mm, and the rotating tool in FIG. 4(b) has a pin, a shoulder diameter of 20 mm, and a pin length of 0.7 mm. The rotating tool FIG. 5(a) has no pin, an end portion with a planar shape, and no spiral stepped portion, and the rotating tool in FIG. 5(b) has no pin, an end portion with a planar shape, and a spiral stepped portion (clockwise direction). The rotating tool in FIG. 6(a) has no pin, an end portion with a convex curved shape, and no spiral stepped portion, and the rotating tool in FIG. 6(b) has no pin, an end portion with a convex curved shape, and a spiral stepped portion (clockwise direction). The rotating tool in FIG. 7(a) has no pin, an end portion with a concave curved shape, and no spiral stepped portion, and the rotating tool in FIG. 7(b) has no pin, an end portion with a concave curved shape, and a spiral stepped portion (clockwise direction).
[0141] The following evaluation was conducted by using the obtained welding joint.
[0142] (I) Presence or Absence of Surface Defects in Observation of Joint Appearance
[0143] Observation was performed by using portions of the obtained welding joints that were welded at the welding speeds shown in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. The presence or absence of surface defects was visually determined on the basis of whether a groove-shaped portion in an unwelded state was observed due to insufficient plastic flow or whether a welded portion was observed in a recessed manner because of the distance G between the shoulder portions of the welding tools being too narrow. If the groove-shaped portion in an unwelded state or the welded portion formed in a recessed manner was observed as a surface defect, the depth Dd (mm) of the surface defect was measured using a laser displacement meter and evaluated on the basis of the following criteria.
<Criteria>
[0144] No: None of the surface defects described above was observed. [0145] Acceptable: One of the surface defects described above was observed, but the ratio (Dd/t) of the depth Dd (mm) to the thickness t (mm) of the steel sheets was 0.1 or less. [0146] Yes: One of the surface defects described above was observed, and the ratio (Dd/t) of the depth Dd (mm) to the thickness t (mm) of the steel sheets exceeded 0.1. Alternatively, the groove-shaped portion in an unwelded state extended from the front surface to the rear surface. If the groove-shaped portion in an unwelded state extended from the front surface to the rear surface, the welding was considered unsuccessful, and the internal defects and joint strength were not evaluated.
[0147] (II) Presence or Absence of Internal. Defects in Observation of Cross Sections of Joints
[0148] Observation was performed by using portions of the obtained welding joints that were welded at the welding speeds shown in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. The cross sections were prepared by cutting the portions at a position of 20 mm from the welding start end, at a position of 20 mm from the welding finish end, and at an intermediate position between the ends to prepare test specimens. The presence or absence of internal defects was determined on the basis of whether the unwelded state formed in the welded portion due to insufficient plastic flow was observed by using an optical microscope (magnification: 10 times), and evaluated on the basis of the following criteria.
<Criteria>
[0149] No: The unwelded state formed in a tunnel shape was not observed at any of the three positions mentioned above. [0150] Acceptable: The unwelded state formed in the welded portion was observed at one of the three positions mentioned above. [0151] Yes: The unwelded state formed in the welded portion was observed at two or more of the three positions mentioned above.
[0152] Table 3 shows the results of determination of (I) the presence or absence of surface defects by observing the joint appearance when the welding was performed once with a welding length of 0.5 m and the results of determination of (II) the presence or absence of internal defects by observing the cross sections of the joint. Table 3 also shows the tensile strength and the indentation depth. The tensile strength was measured in a tensile test (JIS Z 3121) using tensile test specimens each taken from the obtained welding joints and having the dimensions of a No. 1 test specimen defined by JIS Z 3121. The indentation depth in plastic deformation until cracking in the welded portion was measured using an Erichsen tester.
[0153] Table 3 indicates that, in the butt joints of Examples 1 to 24 and the lap joints of Examples 25 to 27, a non-defective welded state was obtained even at high welding speeds of 1.0 m/min or higher, with no surface defect found by observation of the joint appearance or no internal defect found by observation of the cross sections of each joint. The joint strength was 95% or more of the tensile strength of the steel sheets serving as base materials, and the indentation depth until cracking in the welded portion was 5 mm or more in the Erichsen test.
[0154] In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, welding was performed by using rotating tools each having no probe and having spiral stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the rotation direction of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. Surface defects and internal defects were observed in the obtained joints, and a non-defective welded state was not obtained. The joint strength was 70% or less of the tensile strength of the steel sheets serving as base materials, and the indentation depth until cracking in the welded portion was 4 mm or less in the Erichsen test.
[0155] In the lap joint of Comparative Example 4, welding was performed by using rotating tools each having no probe and having spiral stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the rotation direction of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. Surface defects and internal defects were observed in the obtained joint, and a non-defective welded state was not obtained. The joint strength was 70% or less of the tensile strength of the steel sheets serving as base materials, and the indentation depth until cracking in the welded portion was 4 mm or less in the Erichsen test.
[0156] In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 5 to 9, rotating tools each having a pin were used under the conditions where D (the diameter (mm) of the end portion of each rotating tool), a (the inclination angle (°) of each rotating tool), and G (the distance (mm) between the end portions of the two rotating tools) all satisfy the formulas (1), (2) and (3).
[0157] In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 5 to 9, a non-defective welded state was obtained even at high welding speeds of 1.0 m/min or higher, with no surface defect found by observation of the joint appearance or no internal defect found by observation of the cross sections of each joint. It was confirmed that the joint strength and the Erichsen test showed favorable results. However, it was also confirmed that the rotating tools showed poor durability.
[0158] In the lap joint of Comparative Example 10, a non-defective welded state was obtained even at high welding speeds of 1.0 m/min or higher, with no surface defect found by observation of the joint appearance or no internal defect found by observation of the cross sections of the joint. It was confirmed that the joint strength and the Erichsen test showed favorable results. However, it was also confirmed that the rotating tools showed poor durability.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Presence of surface Presence of internal Tensile Erichsen test: indentation defects in observation of defects in observation of strength depth until cracking in joint appearance cross sections of joint (MPa) welded portion (mm) Example 1 No No 1009 8.3 Example 2 No No 1012 8.4 Example 3 No No 1007 8.2 Example 4 No No 1005 8.2 Example 5 No No 1006 8.3 Example 6 No No 1001 8.1 Example 7 No No 430 8.8 Example 8 No No 433 9.0 Example 9 No No 432 9.0 Example 10 No No 1005 8.1 Example 11 No No 1002 8.2 Example 12 No No 1000 8.0 Example 13 No No 1012 8.3 Example 14 No No 1015 8.3 Example 15 No No 1007 8.1 Example 16 No No 430 8.8 Example 17 No No 433 8.9 Example 18 No No 432 8.8 Example 19 No Acceptable 990 7.8 Example 20 Acceptable Acceptable 999 7.8 Example 21 Acceptable No 995 7.9 Example 22 No Acceptable 980 7.5 Example 23 Acceptable Acceptable 987 7.7 Example 24 Acceptable No 983 7.6 Example 25 No No 1011 5.5 Example 26 No No 1006 5.2 Example 27 Acceptable No 1002 5.2 Comparative Example 1 Yes (unwelded portion) Yes 587 3.3 Comparative Example 2 Yes (unwelded portion) Yes 274 2.5 Comparative Example 3 Yes (unwelded portion) Yes 487 2.8 Comparative Example 4 Yes (unwelded portion) Yes 657 2.1 Comparative Example 5 No No 1001 7.9 Comparative Example 6 No No 1003 8.0 Comparative Example 7 No No 997 7.8 Comparative Example 8 No No 424 8.7 Comparative Example 9 No No 422 8.7 Comparative Example 10 No No 995 4.2
[0159] Table 4 shows the number of repeated welding operations with a welding length of 0.5 m, out of the cumulative number of welding operations, in which a non-defective joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more while no internal defect was found by observation of the cross sections of the joint. As shown in Table 4, in the butt joints of Examples 1 to 24 and the lap joints of Examples 25 to 27, the number of welding operations in which a non-defective joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 13 or more.
[0160] In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, welding was performed by using rotating tools each having no probe and having spiral stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the rotation direction of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. In Comparative Examples 1 to 3, the number of welding operations in which a non-defective joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 0.
[0161] In the lap joint of Comparative Example 4, welding was performed by using rotating tools each having no probe and having groove-shaped stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the rotation direction of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. In Comparative Example 4, the number of welding operations in which a non-defective joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 0.
[0162] In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 5 to 9, welding was performed by using rotating tools each having a pin. The number of welding operations in which a non-defective joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 10 or less.
[0163] In the lap joints of Comparative Example 10, welding was performed by using rotating tools each having a pin. The number of welding operations in which a non-defective joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 10 or less.
[0164] As described above, the use of rotating tools each having no probe and having spiral stepped portions caused joint defects or problems with joint strength in welding where the spirals of the spiral stepped portions run in the same direction as the rotation direction of the rotating tools. It was revealed that rotating tools each having a pin showed poor durability.
[0165] Table 3 reveals that the use of rotating tools each having spiral stepped portions increased the weld strength of joints, from the results of the experiments under the same conditions except for the presence or absence of the spiral stepped portions, which are pairs of Examples, that is, Examples 1 and 4, Examples 2 and 5, Examples 3 and 6, Examples 19 and 22, Examples 20 and 23, and Examples 21 and 24.
[0166] The results of Examples 19 and 22 in which experiments were conducted under the conditions that did not satisfy the formula (5) below indicate that the conditions above the range of the formula (5) may affect ensuring of plastic flow sufficient for welding and may lead to occurrence of internal defects although the surface defects are evaluated as “no”. In other words, when rotating tools each having a concave surface further satisfy the condition of the formula (5), occurrence of surface defects and internal defects can be more effectively suppressed to provide a joint having a sufficient strength.
dc/D≤0.03 Formula (5)
[0167] The results of Examples 20 and 23 in which experiments were conducted under the conditions below the lower limit of the range of the formula (3) indicate that the conditions below the lower limit of the range of the formula (3) may affect ensuring of uniform plastic flow in the thickness direction and may lead to occurrence of surface defects or internal defects although the surface defects and the internal defects are evaluated as “acceptable”. In other words, when rotating tools each having a planar surface further satisfy the condition of the formula (3), occurrence of surface defects and internal defects can be more effectively suppressed to provide a joint having a sufficient strength.
4×t≤D≤20×t Formula (3)
[0168] The results of Examples 21 and 24 in which experiments were conducted under the conditions that did not satisfy the formula (4) indicate that the conditions above the range of the formula (4) may affect the shape of the surface of the welded portion and may lead to occurrence of surface defects although the surface defects and the internal defects are evaluated as “acceptable”. In other words, when rotating tools each having a convex surface further satisfy the condition of the formula (4), occurrence of surface defects and internal defects can be more effectively suppressed to provide a joint having a sufficient strength.
dv/D≤0.06 Formula (4)
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Number of welding operations in which non-defective joint is obtained with probability of 90% or more Example 1 16 Example 2 18 Example 3 21 Example 4 15 Example 5 15 Example 6 19 Example 7 13 Example 8 14 Example 9 17 Example 10 16 Example 11 15 Example 12 20 Example 13 18 Example 14 21 Example 15 24 Exampie 16 15 Example 17 16 Example 18 17 Example 19 16 Example 20 15 Example 21 23 Example 22 14 Example 23 14 Example 24 18 Example 25 15 Example 26 16 Example 27 15 Comparative Example 1 0 Comparative Example 2 0 Comparative Example 3 0 Comparative Example 4 0 Comparative Example 5 10 Comparative Example 6 8 Comparative Example 7 10 Comparative Example 8 7 Comparative Example 9 9 Comparative Example 10 8