Pulse voltage conditioning method of vacuum interrupter with automatic conditioning energy adjustment
20220375704 · 2022-11-24
Inventors
- Hui Ma (Xi'an, CN)
- Jingyu Shen (Xi'an, CN)
- Yingsan Geng (Xi'an, CN)
- Zhiyuan Liu (Xi'an, CN)
- Jianhua Wang (Xi'an, CN)
- Jing Yan (Xi'an, CN)
- Yu Du (Xi'an, CN)
Cpc classification
H01H33/59
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
A pulse voltage conditioning method of a vacuum interrupter with automatic conditioning energy adjustment based on a trend of a breakdown voltage of the vacuum interrupter during a conditioning process. A current-limiting resistor and a parallel capacitor are automatically adjusted to ensure the conditioning energy reaching a critical value without deconditioning effect. The critical value refers to a maximum conditioning energy without damaging the electrode surfaces, namely an optimal conditioning energy, which can better remove insulation defects on the electrode surface and improve insulation performance of a vacuum gap. The problems of insufficient conditioning and deconditioning effect during conventional voltage conditioning process of the vacuum interrupter can be solved. Therefore, insulation strength of the vacuum interrupter can be raised to a higher level through conditioning.
Claims
1. A pulse voltage conditioning method of a vacuum interrupter with automatic conditioning energy adjustment, comprising steps of: decreasing a voltage if breakdown occurs and increasing the voltage if the breakdown does not occur, so as to adjust a conditioning energy based on a trend of a breakdown voltage of the vacuum interrupter during a conditioning process; automatically adjusting a current-limiting resistor and a parallel capacitor to optimize the conditioning energy, thereby removing insulation defects on electrode surfaces and improving insulation performance of a vacuum gap; wherein the pulse voltage conditioning method comprises specific steps of: step 1: according to a voltage level of the vacuum interrupter, determining a peak value of a conditioning initial pulse voltage U.sub.c(0), which is P.sub.1 times of a breakdown voltage U.sub.L under a standard lightning impulse voltage of the vacuum interrupter at the voltage level, wherein P.sub.1 ranges from 20%-50%;
U.sub.c(0)=P.sub.1.Math.U.sub.L (1) step 2: according to the conditioning initial pulse voltage, adjusting an initial conditioning energy to Q.sub.c(0), wherein Q.sub.c(0) ranges from 1-10 J; if an output energy of a pulse voltage source is larger than Q.sub.c(0), then connecting the current-limiting resistor in series to an output end of the pulse voltage source to decrease the conditioning energy; if the output energy is less than Q.sub.c(0), connecting the parallel capacitor to both ends of the vacuum interrupter to increase the conditioning energy; step 3: successively applying a pulse voltage to the vacuum interrupter, measuring a breakdown voltage of the vacuum interrupter with a voltage divider, and measuring a breakdown current I.sub.b(n) flowing through the vacuum interrupter with a current transformer; wherein if a peak value of a current flowing through the vacuum interrupter exceeds a critical value of a breakdown current I.sub.bc, the vacuum interrupter is judged to break down, otherwise the vacuum interrupter withstands the pulse voltage; I.sub.bc ranges from 10-20 mA;
I.sub.b(n)≥I.sub.bc (2) if the vacuum interrupter breaks down, decreasing an applied pulse voltage in a next conditioning process by ΔU:
U.sub.c(n+1)=U.sub.c(n)−ΔU (3) wherein a voltage step ΔU is P.sub.2 times of the breakdown voltage U.sub.L under the standard lightning impulse voltage of the vacuum interrupter at the voltage level, and P.sub.2 ranges from 1%-4%;
ΔU=P.sub.2.Math.U.sub.L (4) if the vacuum interrupter withstands the pulse voltage, increasing the applied pulse voltage in the next conditioning process by ΔU:
U.sub.c(n+1)=U.sub.c(n)+ΔU (5) step 4: counting a trend of the breakdown voltage and a maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax during the conditioning process, and calculating the conditioning energy Q.sub.c(n) according to waveforms of a measured breakdown voltage U.sub.b(n) and the breakdown current I.sub.b(n):
Q.sub.c(n)=∫(U.sub.b(n).Math.I.sub.b(n)dt (6) wherein if the breakdown voltage decreases to P.sub.3 times of the maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax, a deconditioning effect is judged to occur, and P.sub.3 ranges from 70%-90%;
U.sub.c≤P.sub.3.Math.U.sub.cmax (7) then increasing the current-limiting resistor or decreasing the parallel capacitor to decrease a next conditioning energy Q.sub.c(n+1) to P.sub.4 times of Q.sub.c(n), wherein P.sub.4 ranges from 80%-90%; meanwhile, counting the trend of breakdown voltage and the maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax again;
Q.sub.c(n+1)P.sub.4#Q.sub.c(n) (8) step 5: if the deconditioning effect never occurs since beginning of the conditioning process, defining the conditioning energy as being low, and decreasing the current-limiting resistor or increasing the parallel capacitor to increase the next conditioning energy Q.sub.c(n+1) to P.sub.5 times of Q.sub.c(n), wherein P.sub.5 ranges from 105%-120%; if the deconditioning effect occurs, stopping increasing the conditioning energy, so as to gradually adjust the conditioning energy to a critical value where the deconditioning effect does not occur; wherein the critical value is a maximum conditioning energy without damaging the electrode surfaces, which is an optimal conditioning energy;
Q.sub.c(n+1)P.sub.5.Math.Q.sub.c(n) (9) and step 6: if the maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax of the vacuum interrupter does not increase in continuous N.sub.s conditioning experiments during which the deconditioning effect does not occur, regarding insulation performance of the vacuum interrupter as optimal and ending the conditioning process, wherein N.sub.s ranges from 300-500.
2. The pulse voltage conditioning method, as recited in claim 1, wherein the automatic conditioning energy adjustment is realized by programming; the measured breakdown voltage and the breakdown current are input, and a control signal for adjusting the current-limiting resistor and the parallel capacitor is output.
3. The pulse voltage conditioning method, as recited in claim 1, wherein a waveform of the applied pulse voltage is a standard lightning impulse voltage.
4. The pulse voltage conditioning method, as recited in claim 1, wherein the current-limiting resistor is a slide rheostat, which smoothly adjusts a resistance value by controlling a position of a slip sheet; or the current-limiting resistor is a multi-level resistance module, which changes the resistance value by controlling switches of different resistances.
5. The pulse voltage conditioning method, as recited in claim 1, wherein the parallel capacitor is a multi-level capacitance module, which changes a capacitance value by controlling switches of different capacitances.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027]
[0028]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0029] Referring to the drawings and embodiment, the present invention will be further illustrated.
[0030] Referring to
U.sub.c(0)=P.sub.1.Math.U.sub.L (1)
ΔU=P.sub.2.Math.U.sub.L (2)
[0031] according to a conditioning initial pulse voltage, adjusting an initial conditioning energy to Q.sub.c(0), wherein Q.sub.c(0) ranges from 1-10 J; if a output energy of a pulse voltage source is larger than Q.sub.c(0), then connecting the current-limiting resistor in series to an output end of the pulse voltage source to decrease the conditioning energy; if the power output is less than Q.sub.c(0), connecting the parallel capacitor to both ends of the vacuum interrupter to increase the conditioning energy; after the above preparation, successively applying a pulse voltage to a vacuum interrupter, measuring a breakdown voltage of the vacuum interrupter with a voltage divider, and measuring a breakdown current I.sub.b(n) flowing through the vacuum interrupter with a current transformer; wherein if a peak value of current flowing through the vacuum interrupter exceeds a critical value of breakdown current I.sub.bc, the vacuum interrupter is judged to break down, otherwise the vacuum interrupter withstands the pulse voltage; I.sub.bc ranges from 10-20 mA;
I.sub.b(n)≥I.sub.bc (3)
[0032] if the vacuum interrupter breaks down, decreasing the applied pulse voltage in a next conditioning process by ΔU; if the vacuum interrupter withstands the pulse voltage, increasing the applied pulse voltage in the next conditioning process by ΔU; under both situations, storing a measured breakdown voltage and counting a trend of the breakdown voltage and a maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax during the conditioning process, and calculating the conditioning energy Q.sub.c(n) according to waveforms of a measured breakdown voltage U.sub.b(n) and the breakdown current I.sub.b(n):
Q.sub.c(n)=∫(U.sub.b(n).Math.I.sub.b(n))dt (4)
[0033] wherein if the breakdown voltage drops to P.sub.3 times of the maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax, a deconditioning effect is judged to occur, and P.sub.3 ranges from 70%-90%; then increasing the current-limiting resistor or decreasing the parallel capacitor to decrease a next conditioning energy Q.sub.c(n+1) to P.sub.4 times of Q.sub.c(n), wherein P.sub.4 ranges from 80%-90%; meanwhile, counting the trend of breakdown voltage and the maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax again;
U.sub.c≤P.sub.3.Math.U.sub.cmax (5)
Q.sub.c(n)=P.sub.4.Math.Q.sub.c(n) (6)
[0034] step 5: if the deconditioning effect never occurs since beginning of the conditioning process, defining the conditioning energy as being low, and decreasing the current-limiting resistor or increasing the parallel capacitor to increase the next conditioning energy Q.sub.c(n+1) to P.sub.5 times of Q.sub.c(n), wherein P.sub.5 ranges from 105%-120%; if the deconditioning effect occurs, stopping increasing the conditioning energy;
Q.sub.c(n+1)P.sub.5.Math.Q.sub.c(n) (7) and
[0035] if the maximum breakdown voltage U.sub.bmax of the vacuum interrupter does not increase in continuous N.sub.s conditioning experiments during which the deconditioning effect does not occur, regarding insulation performance of the vacuum interrupter as optimal and ending the conditioning process, wherein N.sub.s ranges from 300-500.
[0036]
[0037] The present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiment, and those skilled in the art can make modifications and changes to the present invention according to the teachings of the present invention. All such modifications and changes should fall within the protection scope of the present invention.