REFRACTORY ANCHOR FOR A FURNACE REFRACTORY TILE
20190011184 ยท 2019-01-10
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F27B7/28
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F27D1/142
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B28B11/243
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F27D1/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B28B1/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
F27D1/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B28B11/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace and to a method to manufacture such a refractory anchor, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least two parts with one or more dividing planes between the parts which run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.
Claims
1. A refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, wherein the refractory anchor is divided in three or more parts and wherein radial dividing planes run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.
2. The refractory anchor according to claim 1, wherein the parts of the refractory anchor are identically shaped.
3. The refractory anchor according to claim 1, wherein the refractory anchor has a first cone part and a second cone part each with a truncated cone shape, with a shoulder part as transition between the first and second cone parts.
4. The refractory anchor according to claim 3, wherein the bottom plane of the second cone part is at a hot side when in use and wherein the diameter of the bottom plane of the first cone part is less than the diameter of the top plane of the second cone part.
5. The refractory anchor according to claim 1, wherein height of the first cone part is larger than height of the second cone part.
6. The refractory anchor according to claim 5, wherein the height of the second cone part is less than 65% of the height of the first cone part.
7. The refractory anchor according to claim 5, wherein the height of the second cone part is between 35% and 50% of the height of the first cone part.
8. The refractory anchor according to claim 1, wherein the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 5-30 mm.
9. The refractory anchor according to claim 1, wherein the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 15-25 mm.
10. The refractory anchor according to claim 1, wherein an opening angle of the first cone part and/or second cone part are in the range of 2-15.
11. A method for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least three parts, comprising the steps of: providing a mould for the refractory anchor divided in parts, filling the mould with a refractory moulding compound, firing the refractory anchor, and applying a mortar between the parts of the refractory anchor.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the mortar is an air curing mortar.
13. The method according to claim 11, wherein a complementary shape to receive an anchor bolt is formed in the refractory anchor.
14. A mould for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least two parts, wherein the mould has an overall truncated cone shape which is open at one side and closed at the opposite side, a protrusion in the closed side which is shaped for the refractory anchor to receive an anchor bolt and one or more dividing plates which run from the closed side to the open side of the mould.
15. The mould according to claim 14, wherein the dividing plates have a thickness in the range of 1-5 mm.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, wherein the refractory anchor is divided in three or more parts and wherein radial dividing planes run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein the parts of the refractory anchor are identically shaped.
18. The method of claim 11, wherein the refractory anchor has a first cone part and a second cone part each with a truncated cone shape, with a shoulder part as transition between the first and second cone parts.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0033] The invention will be further explained on hand of the example shown in the drawing, in which:
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0037] In
[0038] The side view of an undivided refractory anchor 1 of
[0039] These stresses with a three-part anchor only occur around the division because of the stress relieving effect of the joints. With an anchor in one piece these stresses occur over the entire anchor.
[0040]
[0041] In
[0042] Directly apparent from the diagram is that the two-part anchor is the least favourable embodiment with the largest stresses occurring at the shoulder and the side face of the anchor. Only with regard to the bottom part the one-piece form is worse. This is related to the fact that in the two-part anchor an increased, but localized around the division plane, bending moment occurs which increases the stress intensity. This increased bending moment is less pronounced for the three and four-part anchors.
[0043] The three part form is clearly favourable over the one-piece and two-part form anchor with the largest decrease of the occurring stresses being at or near the shoulder part and a significant decrease of the stresses occurring at the bottom of the anchor. The stresses at the side are less significant reduced with respect to the one piece form, but still there is a decrease.
[0044] The four part anchor shows even further decreased stresses and here the decrease of the stresses occurring at the side and the bottom are significantly reduced in comparison with the stresses occurring at the side and bottom of a three part anchor.