Suspension device for a loudspeaker, manufacturing method and associated loudspeakers

Abstract

The invention relates to a suspension device for a loudspeaker, comprising an annular outer edge that is able to fasten the suspension device to a frame, an annular inner edge that is able to fasten the suspension device to a membrane, a suspension hoop that extends annularly between the edges, said suspension hoop being able to absorb movement stresses produced at the inner edge by means of a deformation that thus forms a resonance mode, the suspension hoop comprising at least one annular protuberance that is positioned so as to minimize the at least one resonance mode of the suspension hoop, the mass of the at least one annular protuberance being between 150% and 400% the mass of a part of the suspension hoop on which the at least one annular protuberance is positioned.

Claims

1. Process for manufacturing a suspension device for a loudspeaker comprising: providing an annular outer edge able to fasten the suspension device to a frame, an annular inner edge able to fasten the suspension device to a membrane, a suspension hoop extending annularly between the outer and inner edges, said suspension hoop being able to absorb movement stresses produced at the inner edge by means of deforming the suspension hoop thus forming at least one resonance mode, the suspension hoop comprises at least one annular protuberance positioned in such a way as to minimize at least one suspension hoop resonance mode, the mass of at least one of these annular protuberances being between 150% and 400% of the mass of a part of the suspension hoop whereupon the annular protuberance is positioned; exciting the inner edge of the suspension device, measuring the movements of the suspension hoop in relation to a stable state of the suspension hoop during a characterization period, detecting the position of the first local maximum of the movements of the suspension hoop in relation to a stable state of the suspension hoop, and defining a position of a protuberance corresponding to a projection of the first local maximum on the suspension hoop in the stable state.

2. Process for manufacturing a suspension device according to claim 1, wherein the step consisting of defining a position of a protuberance further comprises the steps of: defining at least a set of positions wherein the distance between the positions is less than 20% of the total distance of the suspension hoop in the stable state, and determining an average position of at least a set of positions corresponding to the position of the protuberance.

3. Process for manufacturing a suspension device according to claim 1, the step of exciting the inner edge of the suspension device performed with a characteristic signal wherein the frequencies change within a predetermined frequency range, preferably between 100 Hz and 10 KHz.

4. Process for manufacturing a suspension device according to claim 1, wherein the process further comprises the steps of: digitally modeling the dynamics of the suspension device during a characterization period, and the movements of the suspension hoop in relation to a stable state of the suspension hoop, and defining the size of the protuberance by means of a digital simulation of the previously defined model in such a way as to minimize the resonance modes and limit the impact of the weight of the protuberance.

5. Process for manufacturing a suspension device according to claim 1, further comprising after the step of defining a position, the following steps: once again exciting the inner edge of the suspension device that has been improved by positioning an annular protuberance on the device and when the suspension device still has harmful resonance modes, measuring the movements of the improved suspension hoop, i.e., with the annular protuberance, in relation to a stable state of the suspension hoop during a second characterization period, detecting the position of the second local maximum of the movements of the improved suspension hoop in relation to a stable state of the suspension hoop, and defining a position of a second protuberance corresponding to a projection of the second local maximum on the improved suspension hoop in the stable state.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) The method for implementing the invention and its advantages will become more apparent from the following disclosure of the embodiments, given by way of a non-limiting example, supported by the attached figures wherein FIGS. 1 to 11 represent:

(2) FIG. 1: a radial sectional view of a suspension device in a stable state;

(3) FIG. 2: a radial sectional view of the suspension device of FIG. 1 in a first excitation state;

(4) FIG. 3: a radial sectional view of the suspension device of FIG. 1 in a second excitation state;

(5) FIG. 4: a radial sectional view of the suspension device of FIG. 1 in a third excitation state;

(6) FIG. 5: a radial sectional view of the suspension device of FIG. 1 in a step consisting of defining the sets of positions;

(7) FIG. 6: a radial sectional view of the suspension device of FIG. 1 in a step consisting of defining an average position;

(8) FIG. 7: a radial sectional view of a suspension device provided with three annular protuberances according to a first embodiment of the invention;

(9) FIG. 8: an enlargement of the radial protuberance of FIG. 7;

(10) FIG. 9: a perspective and radial sectional view of a suspension device provided with two annular protuberances according to a second embodiment of the invention;

(11) FIG. 10: a perspective and radial sectional view of a suspension device provided with two annular protuberances according to a third embodiment of the invention; and

(12) FIG. 11: a perspective and radial sectional view of a suspension device provided with only one annular protuberance according to a fourth embodiment of the invention;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(13) FIGS. 1 to 8 describe the process for implementing the suspension device according to the invention. In a first step a suspension device 10 to be improved is shown in FIG. 1 in a stable state. The suspension device 10 comprises a fixed annular outer edge 12 and a fixed annular inner edge 14 fastened to a membrane 15 that is mobile in translation. A suspension device 16 annularly connects to the two edges 12, 14. The membrane 15 is then moved in order to measure the movements induced by the suspension hoop 16 during the characterization period. Preferably, the membrane 15 is moved at frequencies within a frequency range associated with the suspension device. Preferably, the membrane 15 excitation signal corresponds to a sinusoidal signal wherein the amplitude is constant and wherein the frequency is variable between a low frequency and a high frequency within the frequency range, for example, within the frequency range 100 Hz to 10 KHz.

(14) FIGS. 2 to 4 show the resonances induced into the suspension hoop 16 by the movements of the membrane 15. The resonances of the suspension hoop 16 during the characterization period are digitally captured by means of sampling and each sample is analyzed in order to detect the local maxima 17.

(15) The measurements are preferably performed by means of an interferometry system. The suspension device 10 is placed on a dedicated support, and a laser is positioned on a mobile support on three axes in order to scan all the emitting surface of the suspension device 10. The laser is used to measure the movements of the suspension device 10 during the characterization period. This measurement makes it possible to obtain sound pressure and harmonic distortion graphs of the suspension device 10 during the characterization period.

(16) FIGS. 2 to 4 represent three of these samples, with the suspension device 16 of FIG. 1 for reference. The local maxima correspond to the peaks and troughs formed by the suspension hoop 16 over time. The first maxima 17 and the projection thereof onto the suspension hoop 16 in the steady state (FIG. 1) is measured, i.e., the maxima 17 closest to the annular inner edge 14 able to fasten the suspension device 10 to a membrane 15.

(17) FIG. 5 shows that the projection of the maxima 17 is marked on the suspension hoop 16 in the steady state (FIG. 1) making it possible to determine the position of at least a protuberance 20.

(18) The characteristic positioned in such a way as to minimize at least a resonance mode is thus interpreted in this document as positioned on the suspension hoop 16 at the first local maximum 17.

(19) When several positions are determined, it may be useful to gather together the closest positions in order to avoid double detections that correspond to the same weakness of the suspension hoop 16. To do this, FIG. 5 reveals that the positions detected 18 are grouped together according to sets 19 wherein the distance is less than 20% of the total distance of the suspension hoop 16 in the steady state. The position of each protuberance 20 is then an average position 21 between the positions 18 of each set 19. FIG. 6 shows three averages positions 21 detected during an example of analysis for FIGS. 1 to 8.

(20) A protuberance 20 is thus positioned on the suspension hoop 16 at the average position 21. The frequency response of the suspension device 10 can thus once again be studied and if the response is unsatisfactory, i.e., the improved suspension hoop 16 still has harmful resonance modes, a new protuberance 20 can be added.

(21) FIG. 7 illustrates a suspension hoop 16 according to a first embodiment of the invention improved by three protuberances 20 wherein the position corresponds to the average positions 21 detected during three consecutive improvements of the suspension device 10. The annular protuberances 20 consists of an even thickness of material with a circular radial cross-section.

(22) FIG. 8 illustrates that the size of the annular protuberances 20 is dampened in such a way that the mass (or for a homogeneous material, the volume) of each protuberance 20 is between 150% and 400% of the mass of a part of the suspension hoop 16 upon which at least an annular protuberance 20 is positioned. Thus, the volume 25 of the protuberance 20 is between 150% and 400% of the volume of the part of the suspension hoop 16 whereupon the protuberance 20 is located. Preferably, the volume 25 of the protuberance 20 corresponds to 250% of the volume 24 of the part of the suspension hoop 16.

(23) Alternatively, the weight of each protuberance 20 can be numerically defined using a digital model of the suspension device 10. The dynamics of the suspension device 10 are then digitally modeled according to the measurements of the movements of the suspension hoop 16. The size of the protuberance 20 is found by means of a digital simulation of the previously defined model in such a way as to minimize the resonance modes and limit the impact of the weight of the protuberance 20.

(24) The size of the protuberance 20 is modified between two numerical simulations in order to raise the mass ratio from 150% to 400% with a predefined calculation interval of approximately 10%. The response for each simulation is observed in order to calculate the amplitude of the oscillations of the suspension device 10 and the rigidity of the annular inner edge 14. The amplitude of the oscillations of the suspension device 10 makes it possible to numerically estimate the resonance modes. Therefore, this amplitude needs to be minimal. The rigidity of the annular inner edge 14 makes it possible to numerically estimate the impact of the weight of the protuberance 20. Therefore, this rigidity needs to be minimal. The more the weight of the protuberances 20 increases, the more the amplitude decreases and the more the rigidity increases. The main concern is to reduce the resonance modes and the weight of the protuberance 20 will then be numerically increased in the mass ratio of 150% to 400% up to the point of halving the amplitude of the oscillations in relation to the variations of the protuberance-free suspension device 10.

(25) In another variant, the weight of each protuberance 20 can be defined based upon the maximum distance of the local maximum 17 in the stable state of the suspension hoop 16 during the characterization period while remaining within the mass ratio 150% to 400%.

(26) FIGS. 9, 10, and 11 reveal three different embodiments wherein the stresses applied to the suspension device are different. As a result, the number of protuberances differ, namely two for FIGS. 9 and 10 and only one for FIG. 11 and the position of the protuberances 20 also differs from FIGS. 9 to 11.

(27) The invention thus makes it possible to suppress only those suspension hoop 16 oscillations that are identified as harmful to the quality of the sound. However, it does not aim to reduce all oscillations insofar as this would cause too large a reduction in the dynamics of the loudspeaker. Furthermore, the weight of the protuberances 20 is dampened in order to limit the degradation induced into the dynamics of the loudspeaker.

(28) The invention makes it possible to propose a loudspeaker wherein the acoustic performance is increased by virtue of the device of the invention.