GRID STRUCTURES FOR STABLE GAS RETENTION UNDER LIQUIDS
20180362118 · 2018-12-20
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B08B17/065
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B63B2001/387
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B63B1/38
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F15D1/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F15D1/0085
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T70/10
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
Device mountable on a surface (10), the device comprising a spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) and a grid structure (2) which grid structure (2) is attached in spaced relation to the surface (10) by means of the spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22), wherein the distance between the surface (10) and the grid structure (2) is in a range from >0.1 m to <10 mm, wherein the grid structure (2) forms meshes of a mesh size in a range from >0.5 m to <8 mm, and wherein the surface of the grid structure (2) is at least partially amphiphobic. Method of maintaining a gas or air layer on a surface when the surface is immersed in a liquid or water comprising such device, and uses thereof.
Claims
1. A device mountable on a surface (10), the device comprising a spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) and a grid structure (2) which grid structure (2) is attached in spaced relation to the surface (10) by means of the spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22), wherein the distance between the surface (10) and the grid structure (2) is in a range from 0.1 m to 10 mm, wherein the grid structure (2) forms meshes of a mesh size in a range from 0.5 m to 8 mm, and wherein the surface of the grid structure (2) is at least partially amphiphobic.
2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the grid structure is provided by a perforated plate, a grating, a net, a woven or non-woven mesh, or is formed by woven or non-woven filaments.
3. The device according to claim 1, wherein the distance between the surface (10) and the grid structure (2) is in a range from 1 m to 6 mm.
4. The device according to claim 1, wherein the grid structure (2) forms meshes of a mesh size in a range from 5 m to 2 mm.
5. The device according to claim 1, wherein the spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) is formed by solitary rodlike bars (12) or wall-like ledges (20, 22), or by a porous layer (16), or the spacer system is a combination thereof.
6. The device according to claim 1, wherein wall-like ledges (20, 22) form compartments (18) on the surface (10).
7. The device according to claim 1, wherein the wall-like ledges (20, 22) comprise through openings (24, 26, 28) to provide an exchange of gas between adjacent compartments (18).
8. The device according to claim 1, wherein the grid structure (2) comprises protrusions (30) on the grid surface.
9. An object comprising a device mountable on a surface (10), the device comprising a spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) and a grid structure (2) which grid structure (2) is attached in spaced relation to the surface (10) by means of the spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) according to claim 1.
10. A method of maintaining a gas or air layer on a surface (10) when the surface is immersed in a liquid or water, the method comprising providing a device mountable on a surface (10), the device comprising a spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) and a grid structure (2) which grid structure (2) is attached in spaced relation to the surface (10) by means of the spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22), wherein the distance between the surface (10) and the grid structure (2) is in a range from 0.1 m to 10 mm, wherein the grid structure (2) forms meshes of a mesh size in a range from 0.5 m to 8 mm, and wherein the surface of the grid structure (2) is at least partially amphiphobic.
11. Use of a device mountable on a surface (10), the device comprising a spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) and a grid structure (2) which grid structure (2) is attached in spaced relation to the surface (10) by means of the spacer system (12, 16, 20, 22) according to claim 1 for the reduction of flow resistance or friction, for the prevention of biofouling, and/or as a sensor for flow or pressure.
12. The device according to claim 1, wherein the distance between the surface (10) and the grid structure (2) is in a range from 10 m to 2 mm.
13. The device according to claim 1, wherein the grid structure (2) forms meshes of a mesh size in a range from 10 m to 800 m.
Description
[0043] The figures show:
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080]
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
[0084]
EXAMPLE 1
[0085] A Teflon grid having a mesh size of 0.1 mm and a steel net having a mesh size of 1 mm were fixed on plastic containers with a rectangular cross section having external dimensions of 25254 mm.sup.3, and dimensions of a recess of 22222 mm.sup.3. The grids and containers were hydrophobized with Tegotop 210 (Evonik) and immersed in water. The containers were able to retain a gas film on the surface for several weeks under water.
EXAMPLE 2
[0086] The effect of different dimension of openings in grid structured on the stability of gas films was determined. For this, round, hexagonal and rectangular opening of a minimal hole diameter of 300 m to a major hole diameter of 8 mm were used.
[0087] Twelve different grid structures were used: metal perforated plates with round openings of different sizes (1.5-8 mm) (JAERA GmbH & Co. KG; Dillinger Fabrik gelochter Bleche GmbH) and metal perforated plates with hexagonal apertures of two sizes (2 mm and 6 mm), an epoxy replica (TOOLCRAFT Epoxyharz L; Conrad Electronic SE) of five of these perforated plates (Rv 1.5/2.5; Rv 2/3; Rv 3/4; SkL 2/2.5), two woven wire cloths (agar Scientific), a plastic web screen (Tesa insect stop, tesa SE) and two Teflon webs (ETFE Screen, 20 mesh and 50 mesh; TED PELLA, INC.). Table 1 summarizes the dimensions of the apertures of the perforated plates, Table 2 summarizes the dimensions of the mesh size of the webs and the woven wire web.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 dimensions of the apertures of the perforated plates from metal and epoxy resin hole diameter center distance indication perforation [mm] [mm] Rv 1.5/2.5 round, staggered 1.5 2.5 Rv 2/3 round, staggered 2 3 Rv 3/4 round, staggered 3 4 Rv 6/8 round, staggered 6 8 Rv 8/12 round, staggered 8 12 SkL 2/2.5 hexagonal 2 2.5 SkL 6/6.7 hexagonal 6 6.7
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 mesh size of the webs and woven wire cloth indication mesh size [mm] wire web, fine ca. 0.35 wire web, coarse 0.6 Teflon grid, fine 0.3 Teflon grid, coarse 0.9 plastic web screen 1.2
[0088] Experiments were performed using each of the grid structures on two different types of samples with chambers of two different sizes: a square chamber having an edge length of 12 mm and a depth of 2 mm, and a smaller hexagonal chamber having a diameter of 7 mm and a depth of 4 mm. The grids were fixed on the respective samples (9 chambers below the grid in case of the square chambers, 7 chambers below the grid in case of the hexagonal chambers) with glue and hydrophobized with Tegotop 210 (Evonik). Afterwards the samples equipped with the different grids were immersed into water to a depth of 20 mm and fixed by using putty (plastic-fermit Installationskitt, fermit GmbH).
[0089] After two weeks the samples were cautiously removed from the water. Using indicator paper the bottom of the chambers was examined in view of moisture to determine if a water ingress had occurred. For the samples with the bigger chambers of an edge length of 12 mm, nine pieces of indicator paper were used (one in each chamber), the smaller chambers were sampled using seven papers (one in each chamber).
[0090] Regarding the grids fixed on the 12 mm-chambers, using the fine Teflon grid with a mesh size of 0.3 mm it was seen that six out of nine test sites remained dry, representing the best result achieved. Also the fine wire web with a mesh size of 0.35 mm showed a stable gas film on the bottom surface. Regarding the grids fixed on the 7 mm-chambers, the fine Teflon grid with a mesh size of 0.3 mm showed that all seven test sides remained dry, while for the coarse Teflon grid with a mesh size of 0.9 mm only one test side was moist. Also for the perforated plate Rv 1.5/2.5 all seven test sides remained dry. This shows that a stable gas film was kept using all structures and mesh sizes.
[0091] The test run was repeated using similar conditions. In the second run, regarding the grids fixed on the 12 mm-chambers, the fine Teflon grid and the fine wire web again showed best results. Also the plastic web screen (1.2 mm), the coarse Teflon grid and the perforated metal plate Rv 2/3 showed good results. The bottom of the chambers under the fine and the coarse wire webs remained dry over the test period.
[0092] Regarding the grids fixed on the 7 mm-chambers, only the perforated metal plates Rv 3/4 and Rv 2/2.5 showed occasional moist test sites. It is assumed that these were caused by a flawed coating of the grids.
[0093] The results of the first and second test run show that the grid structures except the biggest grids Rv 6/8 and Rv 8/12 provided a stable gas film for the test period of two weeks. The fine Teflon grid with a mesh size of 0.3 mm showed the best test results. Generally it was seen that the smaller and deeper chamber (7 mm) provided better results compared with the 12 mm-chamber. However, all the tested grids except the biggest grids Rv 6/8 and Rv 8/12 and chambers were able to stable keep a gas layer on the surface when immersed into water over two weeks.