Electrolyzers for the reduction of carbon dioxide to formate
11591700 · 2023-02-28
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C25B9/23
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02E60/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
C25B9/23
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present disclosure relates to an electrochemical flow cell that includes a gap positioned between an ion exchange membrane (IEM) and a cathode gas diffusion electrode (GDE), where the gap is positioned to contain a liquid and the gap has a thickness value, as defined by the distance between the IEM and the cathode GDE, of between greater than zero mm and less than about 2.0 mm. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the gap may be between about 0.1 mm and about 1.0 mm.
Claims
1. An electrochemical flow cell configured for the reduction of carbon dioxide, the electrochemical flow cell comprising: a first gap positioned between an ion exchange membrane (IEM) and a cathode gas diffusion electrode (GDE), and a cathode flow plate, wherein: the cathode GDE is positioned between the IEM and the cathode flow plate, the cathode flow plate comprises a serpentine flow path, the first gap is configured to contain a liquid, and the first gap has a width value, as defined by the distance between the IEM and the cathode GDE, of between about 0.1 mm and about 2.0 mm.
2. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, wherein the width is between about 0.1 mm and about 1.0 mm.
3. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, wherein the first gap, when filled with the liquid, provides a conductivity of greater than about 5 S/m.
4. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, further comprising at least two contacts configured to estimate a voltage drop across the electrochemical cell.
5. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, wherein: the cathode flow plate further comprises a first inlet and a first outlet, and the serpentine flow path fluidly connects the first inlet and the first outlet.
6. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 5, wherein: the serpentine flow path comprises three or more channels positioned substantially parallel relative to each other, and the channels are configured to maximize contact of the carbon dioxide with a maximum amount of area of the cathode GDE.
7. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 6, wherein: each channel comprises a section comprising: a first portion which traverses across a first dimension of the cathode flow plate; a second portion which crosses a portion of a second dimension of the cathode flow plate, and a third portion which traverses across the first dimension of the cathode flow plate, wherein: the first dimension is substantially perpendicular to the second dimension, when in the first portion, the carbon dioxide flows in a first direction, and when in the third portion, the carbon dioxide flows in a second direction that is substantially opposite to the first direction.
8. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 7, wherein: each channel comprises two or more sections, and each section is connected in series to the remaining sections.
9. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, further comprising: a baffled gasket, and the cathode flow plate further comprises a second inlet and a second outlet, wherein: the baffled gasket is positioned between the IEM and the cathode GDE, the baffled gasket forms a second gap between the IEM and the cathode GDE, and the second inlet and the second outlet are fluidly connected by the second gap.
10. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, wherein the cathode GDE comprises an anion exchange ionomer.
11. The electrochemical flow cell of claim 1, wherein the electrochemical flow cell is configured to convert the carbon dioxide to formate.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Some embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than limiting.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
REFERENCE NUMBERS
(9) 100 . . . electrochemical flow cell 105 . . . ion exchange membrane (IEM) 106 . . . cation exchange layer (CEL) 107 . . . anion exchange layer (AEL) 108 . . . separator 110 . . . cathode gas diffusion electrode (cathode GDE) 111 . . . cathode gas diffusion layer (cathode GDL) 112 . . . cathode catalyst layer 115 . . . anode gas diffusion electrode (anode GDE) 116 . . . anode gas diffusion layer 117 . . . anode catalyst layer 120 . . . flow plate 125 . . . housing 130 . . . current collector 135 . . . anolyte inlet 136 . . . anolyte outlet 140 . . . cathode inlet 141 . . . cathode outlet 145 . . . catholyte inlet 146 . . . catholyte outlet 150 . . . baffled gasket 151 . . . baffle 152 . . . unbaffled gasket 155 . . . gap for aqueous electrolyte mixture 160 . . . voltage contact
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10) The present disclosure may address one or more of the problems and deficiencies of the prior art discussed above. However, it is contemplated that some embodiments as disclosed herein may prove useful in addressing other problems and deficiencies in a number of technical areas. Therefore, the embodiments described herein should not necessarily be construed as limited to addressing any of the particular problems or deficiencies discussed herein.
(11) References in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, “some embodiments”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
(12) As used herein the term “substantially” is used to indicate that exact values are not necessarily attainable. By way of example, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that in some chemical reactions 100% conversion of a reactant is possible, yet unlikely. Most of a reactant may be converted to a product and conversion of the reactant may asymptotically approach 100% conversion. So, although from a practical perspective 100% of the reactant is converted, from a technical perspective, a small and sometimes difficult to define amount remains. For this example of a chemical reactant, that amount may be relatively easily defined by the detection limits of the instrument used to test for it. However, in many cases, this amount may not be easily defined, hence the use of the term “substantially”. In some embodiments of the present invention, the term “substantially” is defined as approaching a specific numeric value or target to within 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, or within 1% of the value or target. In further embodiments of the present invention, the term “substantially” is defined as approaching a specific numeric value or target to within 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, or 0.1% of the value or target.
(13) As used herein, the term “about” is used to indicate that exact values are not necessarily attainable. Therefore, the term “about” is used to indicate this uncertainty limit. In some embodiments of the present invention, the term “about” is used to indicate an uncertainty limit of less than or equal to ±20%, ±15%, ±10%, ±5%, or ±1% of a specific numeric value or target. In some embodiments of the present invention, the term “about” is used to indicate an uncertainty limit of less than or equal to ±1%, ±0.9%, ±0.8%, ±0.7%, ±0.6%, ±0.5%, ±0.4%, ±0.3%, ±0.2%, or ±0.1% of a specific numeric value or target.
(14) Compared to other CO.sub.2 reduction products, formic acid (CH.sub.2O.sub.2)/formate salt stands out as one of only two currently economically viable products, with the other being CO. Other CO.sub.2 reduction products include CH.sub.4, CH.sub.2O, CH.sub.3OH, C.sub.2H.sub.4, C.sub.2H.sub.4, C.sub.2H.sub.4O, C.sub.2H.sub.4O.sub.2, C.sub.2H.sub.5OH, C.sub.2H.sub.6O.sub.2, C.sub.2H.sub.2O.sub.2, C.sub.3H.sub.6O, C.sub.3H.sub.6O.sub.3, and C.sub.3H.sub.7OH. Thus, the present disclosure relates to devices, systems, and methods for producing one or more of these CO.sub.2 reduction products, including formic acid, via electrochemical flow cells as described herein. Some of the possible half-reactions for the reduction of CO.sub.2 to useful products are summarized in Table 1 below. This list is not inclusive and other half-reactions completed using at least some of the aspects of the electrochemical flow cells described herein, to produce one or more other products, fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
(15) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Example of CO.sub.2 reduction reactions. Electrode potentials Possible half−reactions of electrochemical (V vs SHE) CO.sub.2 reduction at pH 7 CO.sub.2 (g) + e.sup.− .fwdarw. *COO.sup.− −1.90 CO.sub.2 (g) + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup.− .fwdarw. HCOOH (I) −0.61 CO.sub.2 (g) + H.sub.2O (I) + 2e.sup.− .fwdarw. HCOO.sup.− (aq) + OH.sup.− −0.43 CO.sub.2 (g) + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup.− .fwdarw. CO (g) + H.sub.2O (I) −0.53 CO.sub.2 (g) + H.sub.2O (I) + 2e.sup.− .fwdarw. CO (g) + 2OH.sup.− −0.52 CO.sub.2 (g) + 4H.sup.+ + 2e.sup.− .fwdarw. HCHO (I) + H.sub.2O (I) −0.48 CO.sub.2 (g) + 3H.sub.2O (I) + 4e.sup.− .fwdarw. HCHO (I) + 4OH.sup.− −0.89 CO.sub.2 (g) + 6H.sup.+ (I) + 6e.sup.− .fwdarw. CH.sub.3OH (I) + H.sub.2O (I) −0.38 CO.sub.2 (g) + 5H.sub.2O (I) + 6e.sup.− .fwdarw. CH.sub.3OH (I) + 6OH.sup.− −0.81 CO.sub.2 (g) + 8H.sup.+ + 8e.sup.− .fwdarw. CH.sub.4 (g) + 2H.sub.2O (I) −0.24 CO.sub.2 (g) + 6H.sub.2O (I) + 8e.sup.− .fwdarw. CH.sub.4 (g) + 8OH.sup.− −0.25 2CO.sub.2 (g) + 12H.sup.+ + 12e.sup.− .fwdarw. C.sub.2H.sub.4 (g) + 4H.sub.2O (I) 0.06 2CO.sub.2 (g) + 8H.sub.2O (I) + 12e.sup.− .fwdarw. C.sub.2H.sub.4 (g) + 12OH.sup.− −0.34 2CO.sub.2 (g) + 12H.sup.+ + 12e.sup.− .fwdarw. CH.sub.3CH.sub.2OH (I) + 0.08 3H.sub.2O (I) 2CO.sub.2 (g) + 9H.sub.2O (I) + 12e.sup.− .fwdarw. CH.sub.3CH.sub.2OH (I) + −0.33 12OH.sup.− (I)
(16)
(17) Referring again to
(18) Referring again to
(19)
(20)
(21) For the exemplary electrochemical flow cell shown in
(22)
(23)
(24) Referring again to
(25)
(26)
(27)
Each variable is defined as follows: J is total molar flux of ions N is molar flux minus convection of ions u is the velocity field p is pressure ϕ is the electric potential c.sub.i is concentration of species i z.sub.i is valency F is faraday's constant u.sub.i is the mobility of species D.sub.i is diffusivity of species i p is the mass density I is the identity tensor
(28)
(29) Thus, among other things, the present disclosure relates to novel and scalable electrochemical cell architectures, which may be used to produce, among other things, formate from the electrochemical reduction of CO.sub.2. Benefits of the improved electrochemical flow cell designs described herein, include increased conductivities and/or exceptional durability after continuous operating of the electrochemical flow cells.
(30) As shown herein, the cell architectures described above are particularly robust and scalable for the electrochemical reduction of CO.sub.2 (CO.sub.2R) to formate. In one design, a faradaic efficiency of up to about 90% for the conversion of CO.sub.2R to formate at 500 mA/cm.sup.2 was realized at a 25 cm.sup.2 cathode gas diffusion electrode (GDE) with a carbon-supported SnO.sub.2 electrocatalyst. A 1.27 mm wide gap for the catholyte 155 was used between the ion exchange membrane 105 and cathode GDE 110, which in some embodiments of the present disclosure, may be reduced in thickness to the order of tens of micrometers. A ten-hour stability test was performed using this exemplary device at 150 mA cm.sup.−2.
(31) Two different cell architectures were studied. The first one (not shown), was a full membrane electrode assembly (MEA) based on the integration of the components of conventional fuel cell electrodes using typical fuel cell hardware. In this architecture, the ion exchange membrane 105 was in direct contact with the catalyst-containing electrodes that were positioned between the gas diffusion (porous transport) layers (111 and 116) and 25 cm.sup.2 triple serpentine flow fields. An important aspect of such a design was that the cation exchange layer 106 of the IEM 105 was in direct contact with the cathode GDE 110, limiting ohmic losses as ions were conducted from the membrane directly to the electrode. To facilitate ion transport in the electrodes, two kinds of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) with ionomers of different functionalities were fabricated and tested. In this first configuration, when a proton-conducting ionomer (Nafion™) was utilized in the electrode, the FE of CO.sub.2 reduction to formate was <5%, with the bulk of the current going toward the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Under an applied electric field, H.sup.+ produced from water dissociation at the IEM 105 junction migrated toward the cathode, resulting in a pH between 0 and 1 near the cathode catalyst layer surface. This high concentration of H.sup.+ in the cathode GDE promoted HER kinetics while suppressing the desired CO.sub.2 reduction reaction.
(32) In an effort to mitigate the low pH at the cathode, an anion exchange ionomer was incorporated into the cathode GDE 110 creating an anionic MEA. With the same SnO.sub.2 loading of 0.5 mg cm.sup.−2, at current densities of <100 mA cm.sup.−2, the selectivity toward formate was an order of magnitude higher than that obtained with the Nafion™ ionomer in the cathode. This result suggests that the anion exchange ionomer in the cathode GDE 110 effectively increases the local pH in the cathode catalyst layer, suppressing the HER and thereby improving CO.sub.2R selectivity. However, this benefit is not without limitations, as the formate FE dropped to <5% at current densities of >100 mA cm.sup.−2. At these higher current densities, the anion exchange ionomer in the cathode GDE 110 runs out of capacity to offset the local acidity, which is inevitable because the amount of H.sup.+ produced at the IEM 105 junction and transported to the cathode is in proportion to the current density. Consequently, it may not feasible to achieve high CO.sub.2R selectivity at high current densities with this first cell design, as CO.sub.2R was not able to compete kinetically with the HER due to a high local acidity in the cathode.
(33) To address these issues, a novel cell architecture was designed and tested. As shown herein, one way to effectively reduce the H.sup.+ concentration at the cathode interface is to add an aqueous electrolyte layer to separate the cathode GDE from the membrane. One of the key challenges to incorporating an aqueous electrolyte layer into a CO.sub.2 electrolyzer is to balance the buffering effect, maximizing CO.sub.2R selectivity while minimizing resistive ohmic losses. The novelty of the cell architecture developed in this study is the tunable catholyte layer thickness between the cation exchange layer of the BPM and the cathode (see
(34) The foregoing discussion and examples have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the aspects, embodiments, or configurations to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the aspects, embodiments, or configurations are grouped together in one or more embodiments, configurations, or aspects for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. The features of the aspects, embodiments, or configurations, may be combined in alternate aspects, embodiments, or configurations other than those discussed above. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the aspects, embodiments, or configurations require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment, configuration, or aspect. While certain aspects of conventional technology have been discussed to facilitate disclosure of some embodiments of the present invention, the Applicants in no way disclaim these technical aspects, and it is contemplated that the claimed invention may encompass one or more of the conventional technical aspects discussed herein. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate aspect, embodiment, or configuration.