METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING THE COMMISSIONING OF AT LEAST ONE OF A PLURALITY OF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY FIELD DEVICES

20180348725 ยท 2018-12-06

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    The invention relates to a method and to a system for optimizing the commissioning of at least one of a plurality of field devices in an automation technology system, which are used in different applications, wherein the system comprises at least: one database for saving application information and device types of the plurality of field devices and for saving parameter sets of the plurality of field devices; an electronic computation unit that accesses the remotely arranged database and classifies, assigns, compares, and/or processes the data saved there and has an algorithm for creating and proposing an optimal parameter set; software for supporting a user during commissioning of one of the plurality of field devices, wherein the electronic computation unit is operated by means of the software.

    Claims

    1-17. (canceled)

    18. A method for optimizing a commissioning of at least one of a plurality of field devices in an automation technology system, comprising: collecting application information and device types of the plurality of field devices, wherein the application information describes each of the plurality of field devices unambiguously with respect to its application; classifying the application information of the plurality of field devices and saving the classified application information; collecting and saving parameter sets of each of the plurality of field devices, wherein the parameter sets include several parameters, each parameter having a parameter value or a parameter value range, and wherein each of the plurality of field devices has at least one parameter set; assigning the parameter sets of the plurality of field devices to the classified application information and to the device types; creating an optimal parameter set from the parameter sets of the same or similar device types for the same or similar applications using an algorithm; proposing the optimal parameter set for the at least one of the plurality of field devices, based upon the application of the at least one field device; when the proposal is completely accepted or partly accepted, replacing the parameter set of the at least one field device with the optimal parameter set for the application of the at least one field device and storing the optimal parameter set in a database.

    19. The method according to claim 18, wherein when parameters contained in the parameter sets are dependent upon each other, only a base parameter is displayed in the proposal.

    20. The method according to claim 18, further comprising: creating an application-specific standard parameter set from the optimal parameter set.

    21. The method according to claim 20, further comprising: manually optimizing the application-specific standard parameter set.

    22. The method according to claim 21, wherein, for later use, comments regarding the individual parameters of the application-specific standard parameter set are created and saved as part of the proposal.

    23. The method according to claim 18, further comprising: separating the optimal parameter set into static parameters that do not change over time and into dynamic parameters.

    24. The method according to claim 23, wherein the at least one field device is parameterized with the optimal parameter set for the respective application when no dynamic parameters are available.

    25. The method according to claim 23, wherein during commissioning of the at least one field device, the user is supported by software in adapting the optimal parameter set with respect to the dynamic parameters.

    26. The method according to claim 23, wherein during commissioning of the at least one field device, the user is supported by a wizard implemented in software in adapting the optimal parameter set with respect to the dynamic parameters.

    27. The method according to claim 23, wherein during commissioning of the at least one field device, the user is supported by a wizard implemented in a device DTM of the at least one field device in adapting the optimal parameter set with respect to the dynamic parameters.

    28. The method according to claim 18, further comprising: creating a degree of validity for the optimal parameter set, wherein the degree of validity includes information about the frequency of a respective successful application and/or a respective successful re-use of the optimal parameter set.

    29. The method according to claim 18, further comprising: creating a parameterization history of the plurality of field devices using software.

    30. A system for optimizing the commissioning of at least one of a plurality of field devices in an automation technology system, comprising: a database configured to save application information and device types of the plurality of field devices and configured to save parameter sets of the plurality of field devices, wherein the database is remotely arranged from the plurality of field devices; an electronic computation unit configured to access the remotely arranged database and configured to classify, assign, compare, and/or process the application information, the device types, and the parameter sets saved in the remotely arranged database, wherein the electronic computation unit is further configured to execute an algorithm for creating and proposing an optimal parameter set; and software configured to support a user during a commissioning of one of the plurality of field devices, wherein the software is further configured to operate the electronic computation unit.

    31. The system according to claim 30, wherein the application information of a field device includes the field device's configuration, measuring method, and/or measuring task data.

    32. The system according to claim 30, wherein the remotely-arranged database and/or the computation unit can be reached via cloud-computing web services.

    33. The system according to claim 30, wherein the software is further configured to track a parameter history of the plurality of field devices over time.

    34. The system according to claim 30, wherein the software is implemented on the computation unit, on a computer of the user, and/or on each of the plurality of field devices.

    Description

    [0039] The invention is explained in greater detail with reference to the following figure. Illustrated is:

    [0040] FIG. 1: an embodiment of the method according to the invention for operating at least one of a plurality of field devices in an automation technology system.

    [0041] FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the method according to the invention for operating at least one of a plurality of field devices F1, F2, F3 in an automation technology system A.

    [0042] The field devices F1, F2, F3 are located in the same system A and are used in the same application or in applications differing from each other. For example, field device F1 and field device F3 are, in this case, flow meters in accordance with the ultrasonic principle, and field device F2 is, in this case, a temperature sensor.

    [0043] Application information Ai and the respective device type are collected from each of the field devices F1, F2, F3. The application information Ai consists, in particular, of configuration, measuring method, and/or measuring task data of a field device, such as the type of medium, or the flange size of a measuring tube in the case of a flow measuring device. Generally speaking, application information Ai constitutes information that sufficiently describes a field device F1, F2, F3 with respect to its application. The application information Ai is sent directly by the respective field device F1, F2, F3 to a database DB, and saved there by the database DB. Alternatively, part of the application information Ai or even all of the application information Ai can also be entered manually into the database DB, e.g., by a technician who commissions a field device F1, F2, F3 on-site. Another alternative is for software, e.g., parameterization software, to read the application data Ai of the field devices F1, F2, F3 and send them to the database DB.

    [0044] The remotely-arranged database DB is a database DB that can be reached by means of cloud-computing web services. Cloud computing in this case describes the saving of data in a remote computing centerin this case, in a remote database DB. The advantage consists in a centralization of the stored data taking place, since each field device F1, F2, F3 saves its data in the form of application information Ai in this database.

    [0045] The application information Ai is sent to the database DB via one or more networks to which each of the plurality of field devices is connected. In principle, any customary protocol of a WAN or LAN network can be used for this purpose. However, an automation technology fieldbus network, such as Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, HART, Modbus, etc., can also be used, which is, for example, connected to the internet via a gateway.

    [0046] The application information Ai saved in the database DB is subsequently classified by the computation unit RE. A user can access the computation unit RE via cloud computing, in the same way as the database DB. The access takes place, for example, by means of an internet-enabled computer or a mobile end device, such as a tablet PC or a smartphone.

    [0047] Alternatively, the internet-enabled computer of the user, or his mobile end device, can assume the role of the computation unit RE, access the database DB, and assume tasks assigned to the computation unit RE.

    [0048] Subsequently, parameter sets aP are collected by the field devices F1, F2, F3. In this case, these parameter sets aP, sP of the respective field devices F1, F2, F3 can also be sent to the database DB by the field devices themselves, or be entered manually into the database DB. As another alternative, in this step as well, software, e.g., parameterization software, can read the parameter sets aP, sP of the field devices F1, F2, F3 and send them to the database DB. Parameter sets aP contain at least one parameter P1, P2, P3, and a parameter value or a parameter value range is assigned to each parameter P1, P2, P3. The parameter sets aP are current parameter sets aP, with which the respective field device F1, F2, F3 is operated. The computation unit RE assigns the parameter sets aP to the respective application information Ai saved in the database DB and saves them in the database DB.

    [0049] The field devices F1, F2, F3 sometimes have a very large number of different parameters P1, P2, P3. In practice, sometimes, only a fraction of the parameters P1, P2, P3 is needed by a customer in an application.

    [0050] In order to determine an optimal parameter set oP with application-specific optimal parameter values, all parameter values of all field devices F1, F2, F3 of an application are compared. The optimal parameter values are determined by means of an algorithm implemented in the computation unit RE. For example, these can be those saved parameter values that occur most often for the respective parameter P1, P2, P3. Other selection mechanisms can also be saved in the algorithm, e.g., the determination of an average value or a median value across all saved parameter values of a respective parameter P1, P2, P3.

    [0051] A proposal for the optimal parameter set oP is subsequently displayed to the customer. In the case where parameters P1, P2, P3 contained in the current parameter sets aP are dependent upon each other, only a base parameter is displayed in the proposal to the customer. If the customer accepts this proposal, the current parameter set aP is replaced by the optimal parameter set oP. In this way, the customer is relieved of the manual parameterization, and the field device F1, F2, F3 is optimally parameterized for the respective application.

    [0052] Lastly, the optimal parameter set oP is also saved in the database DB, in order to optimize the method successively.

    [0053] A degree of validity can be determined for each optimal parameter set oP. A degree of validity contains information regarding the frequency of the respective successful application and/or the respective successful re-use of the respective optimal parameter set oP. If, for example, the evaluation of the most frequent parameter values leads to several results, the different options are displayed together with the respective degree of validity. The customer can thus make an informed decision for the parameter values P1, P2 of the optimal parameter set oP, on the basis of the degree of validity. The higher the degree of validity is, the sooner the respective optimal parameter set oP is suitable for the respective application.

    [0054] If an optimal parameter set oP has a very high degree of validity, an application-specific standard parameter set sP can be created from this optimal parameter set oP. This standard parameter set sP can already be implemented at the factory in the field devices F1, F2, F3 of the same application.

    [0055] The parameterization of the field device F1, F2, F3 takes place via software. The software, moreover, creates a parameterization history. In this respect, the software can be located on the computation unit RE, on a device of the customer, such as a computer or a mobile end device, such as a tablet or smartphone, or directly on each of the plurality of field devices F1, F2, F3.

    [0056] If the optimal parameter set oP contains dynamic parameters, the values of these parameters must be entered manually by the customer. In this case, the software facilitates the input for the customerfor example, by means of a wizard implemented in the software. The customer then must, for example, set only one base parameter from a multitude of dependent dynamic parameters. This base parameter can, however, also be located directly in the device driverfor example, a DTM (device type manager).

    [0057] It goes without saying that the method can be applied to any type and number of field devices F1, F2, F3 and is not limited to the examples of field devices F1, F2, F3 and their parameters P1, P2, P3 used in this embodiment.

    LIST OF REFERENCE SYMBOLS

    [0058] A System [0059] Ai Application information [0060] aP Current parameter set [0061] DB Database [0062] F1, F2, F3 Field devices [0063] oP Optimal parameter set [0064] P1, P2, P3 Parameters [0065] RE Computation unit [0066] sP Application-specific standard parameter set