USE OF INDIVIDUAL BLADE CONTROL ON A PROPELLER OR ROTOR IN AXIAL FLIGHT FOR THE PURPOSE OF AERODYNAMIC BRAKING AND POWER RESPONSE MODULATION

Abstract

Systems and methods are contemplated for favorably improving flight dynamics of aircraft, including enhanced aerodynamic braking and improved flight maneuverability. Air braking systems selectively position a first set of blades at a negative thrust pitch to product a net negative thrust across first and second sets of blades, while balancing torque of the drive shafts to zero. First and second sets of IBC blades can be driven by the same shaft or torque-linked shafts. Flight maneuver systems operate a powerplant at a high power mode, and dissipate the energy from the high power output by positioning a first set of IBC blades at a low efficiency pitch while maintaining constant thrust. As increased or rapid flight maneuverability is required, the first set of blades is positioned toward a high efficiency pitch to instantly increase thrust to the aircraft without requiring a related increase in energy output from the powerplant.

Claims

1. An air brake system comprising: a first drive shaft driving a first set of blades configured to provide a first thrust; and a second drive shaft driving a second set of blades configured to provide a second thrust; wherein the first set of blades are adjustable between a positive thrust pitch and a negative thrust pitch; and wherein the first set of blades are selectively adjusted toward the negative thrust pitch such that the sum of the first and second thrust is negative.

2. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein the first drive shaft is the second drive shaft.

3. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein the first drive shaft is torque-connected to the second drive shaft.

4. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein the first set of blades is operated by individual blade control (IBC).

5. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein the second thrust is positive.

6. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein the first set of blades comprises an odd number of blades.

7. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein the drive shaft is driven by at least one of an electric motor and a turboshaft engine.

8. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein each of the first and second thrusts is negative.

9. The air braking system of claim 1, further comprising a controller that controls operation of the first and second sets of blades such that (i) the first set of blades applies a first torque to the first drive shaft, and (ii) the second set of blades applies a second torque to the second drive shaft, wherein the sum of the first and second torques balances out to zero for at least a period of 3 seconds.

10. The air braking system of claim 1, further comprising a controller that lowers rotational speed of the first set of blades when the first set of blades is operating with the negative thrust pitch.

11. The air braking system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second set of blades comprises a rotor selected from the group consisting of an Optimum Speed Rotor (OSR) and an Optimum Speed Tilt Rotor (OSTR).

12. A rotorcraft using the air braking system of claim 1, and which is a tiltrotor needing to moderate steep descent angles in fixed-wing flight.

13. An electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) craft using the air braking system of claim 1.

14. A flight maneuver system comprising: a first drive shaft driving a first set of blades configured to provide a first thrust; and a second drive shaft driving a second set of blades configured to provide a second thrust; and a powerplant driving the first and second drive shafts, and having a high power mode; wherein the first set of blades is adjustable between a low efficiency pitch and a high efficiency pitch; and wherein, when the powerplant is in the high power mode, the first set of blades is (i) selectively adjusted toward the low efficiency pitch to dissipate energy from the powerplant, or (ii) selectively adjusted toward the high efficiency pitch to increase flight maneuverability.

15. The flight maneuver system of claim 14, wherein the low efficiency pitch generates a first thrust, and wherein the high efficiency pitch generates a second thrust greater than the first thrust.

16. The flight maneuver system of claim 14, wherein the first drive shaft is the second drive shaft.

17. The flight maneuver system of claim 14, wherein the first set of blades are individual blade control (IBC) blades.

18. The flight maneuver system of claim 14, wherein at least one of the first and second set of blades comprise a rotor selected from the group consisting of an Optimum Speed Rotor (OSR) and Optimum Speed Tilt Rotor (OSTR).

19. A rotorcraft using the flight maneuver system of claim 14, and a military attack helicopter requiring aggressive maneuverability.

20. The flight maneuver system of claim 14, wherein the drive shaft is driven by at least one of an electric motor and a turboshaft engine.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0032] FIG. 1 depicts an aircraft employing a system of the inventive subject matter.

[0033] FIG. 2A depicts another aircraft employing a single rotor system of the inventive subject matter.

[0034] FIG. 2B depicts a dual rotor system of the inventive subject matter that can alternatively be employed by an aircraft.

[0035] FIG. 3A depicts another aircraft employing a two-rotor system of the inventive subject matter in a side-by-side configuration.

[0036] FIG. 3B depicts another aircraft employing a two-rotor system of the inventive subject matter in a front-to-back configuration.

[0037] FIG. 4 depicts a rotor of the inventive subject matter.

[0038] FIG. 5A depicts another rotor of the inventive subject matter.

[0039] FIG. 5B depicts still another rotor of the inventive subject matter.

[0040] FIG. 6A depicts yet another rotor of the inventive subject matter.

[0041] FIG. 6B depicts yet another rotor of the inventive subject matter.

[0042] FIG. 7 depicts a representative blade section airspeed and force vector diagram.

[0043] FIG. 8 depicts a representative section airfoil polar plot.

[0044] FIG. 9 depicts a representative plot of brake force generation at zero shaft torque.

[0045] FIG. 10 depicts a representative plot of brake force due to differential collective.

[0046] FIG. 11 depicts a representative plot of braking force control through shaft RPM.

[0047] FIG. 12 depicts a representative plot of shaft torque due to differential collective.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0048] The inventive subject matter contemplates systems, devices, methods, and uses of IBC-capable propellers or rotors to modify flight characteristics or dynamics of aircraft, for example (1) to achieve greater aerodynamic braking effectiveness than would otherwise be possible with non-IBC propellers or rotors, or (2) to rapidly modulate the amount of driveshaft torque required to drive a rotor or propeller while maintaining constant thrust (thus varying the effective lifting efficiency of the rotor).

[0049] Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the inventive subject matter will become more apparent from the detailed description of preferred embodiments herein, along with the accompanying drawing figures in which like numerals represent like components.

[0050] Aerodynamic Braking

[0051] The inventive subject matter provides apparatus, systems and methods in which IBC-capable propellers or rotors are used to achieve greater braking effectiveness than would otherwise be possible with non-IBC propellers or rotors. Note that while many applications of IBC exploit the system's ability to produce non-sinusoidal blade pitch as a function of azimuth, the application disclosed herein alternatively or in combination exploits the system's ability to produce differential blade pitch between the different blades; in other words, IBC is herein used for differential collective pitch, as an alternative or in combination with cyclic pitch.

[0052] As described above, normal propeller air braking dissipates energy absorbed from the airstream using friction in the drive train, and is limited by the thermal and mechanical limits of the drive system. IBC-based air braking in contrast uses different combinations of blades to absorb and to dissipate energy.

[0053] The example of FIG. 5A involves a four-bladed rotor 500a, with blades labeled sequentially around their axis of rotation as blades 501a, 502a, 503a, and 504a, and grouped into two pairs of opposing blades: 501a and 503a (pair 1) and 502a and 504a (pair 2). Energy dissipation is achieved through introduction of differential pitch between pairs 1 and 2. Pair 1 blades are set at a blade pitch for braking, while pair 2 blades are set for thrust. Due to the nonlinearity of the pitch-thrust-torque relationships (see, e.g., FIG. 9), such an arrangement can achieve net braking while simultaneously producing controllable shaft torque, either positive or negative. Variation in the average value of pitch primarily affects the amount of thrust (or braking), while variation in the differential pitch primarily affects the amount of dissipation. Thus propeller RPM can be regulated independent of braking without the need for energy dissipation in the drive train.

[0054] Likewise, the example of FIG. 6A involves six-blade rotor 600a with blades labeled sequentially around their axis of rotation as blades 601a, 602a, 603a, 604a, 605a, and 606a. It should be noted the blades of rotor 600a can be grouped into two groups of three equispaced blades (e.g., group 1 comprising 601a, 603a, and 605a; group 2 comprising 602a, 604a, and 606a) or three groups of two opposing blades (e.g., group 1 comprising 601a and 604a; group 2 comprising 602a and 605a; group 3 comprising 603a and 606a). In the scenario of two groups of three equispaced blades, energy dissipation is achieved through introduction of differential pitch between groups 1 and 2. Group 1 blades are set at a blade pitch for braking, while group 2 blades are set for thrust, as discussed above.

[0055] In the scenario of three groups of two opposing blades, energy dissipation can be achieved through introduction of differential pitch between any one of groups 1, 2, and 3, and subgroups thereof. For example, group 1 blades can be set at a blade pitch for braking while group 2 and 3 blades are set for thrust, group 1 and 2 blades can be set at a blade pitch for braking while group 3 blades are set for thrust. Further, each of group 1, 2, and 3 blades can be set at a different pitch. For example, group 1 can be set at a pitch generating negative thrust (), group 2 can be set at a pitch generating opposing positive thrust () yielding a net zero thrust, and group 3 can be set at a variable pitch to either brake (negative thrust) or propel (positive thrust) the system.

[0056] An example envisions an Optimum Speed Tiltrotor with two 36-foot diameter rotors of 13.5% solidity each. In flight at 300 knots true airspeed, at 400 RPM, such a rotor can produce more than 10,000 lb of braking force while maintaining zero shaft torque. Rotor speed control is maintained by modulating differential collective as needed to accelerate or decelerate the rotor with minor adjustments in shaft torque.

[0057] The braking method described above exploits nonlinearity in the pitch-thrust-torque relationships; blade pitch for pairs 1 and 2 are balanced to achieve zero net torque, but the curve nonlinearities mean that the forward thrust of the driving pair is insufficient to offset the braking effect of the dissipative pair. See, e.g., FIG. 9.

[0058] Blade Load Moderation through RPM Reduction

[0059] The type of braking described herein relies on blade strength to transmit braking loads to the drive shaft. Thus, blades must be designed with sufficient strength to accommodate flight loads associated with the required braking capabilities. Some IBC-capable rotors and propellers are capable of operation across a wide speed range, and such variable-speed operation offers the operational advantage in implementation of the inventive air braking by providing another method of controlling blade loads. Reduction of rotor RPM reduces overall blade loads by reducing the dynamic pressure of the flow over the blade representative section. See, e.g., FIG. 11.

[0060] Rapid Modulation of Required Shaft Torque

[0061] The inventive subject matter further provides apparatus, systems and methods in which individual blade control is used to rapidly modulate the amount of shaft torque required to drive a rotor while maintaining constant thrust, thus varying the effective lifting efficiency of the rotor. During operating periods where enhanced maneuverability is required of the aircraft, the engine is operated at higher power levels than normally required, with excess power dissipated through intentional rotor efficiency reduction. When an aggressive maneuver demands rapid increases in power, the aircraft modulates the rotor efficiency as needed to unleash the excess power available from the engine. Such rotor efficiency modulation can be achieved on much shorter time scales unattainable by the power response timescales of the engine.

[0062] The example of FIG. 5B involves another four-bladed rotor 500b, with blades labeled sequentially around their axis of rotation as blades 501b, 502b, 503b, and 504b, and grouped into two pairs of opposing blades: 501b and 503b (pair 1) and 502b and 504b (pair 2). The rotors 5A and 5B can be identical physically, but are operated differently. Energy dissipation is achieved while maintaining constant thrust in hover by introduction of differential pitch between pairs 1 and 2. Pair 1 blades are set at a blade pitch for thrust decreased below their normal hover value, while pair 2 blades are set for increased thrust, such that the total thrust of the rotor is maintained. Due to the nonlinearity of the pitch-thrust-torque relationships (see, e.g., FIG. 9), such an arrangement can achieve independent control over rotor thrust and required shaft torque. Variation in average value of pitch primarily affects the amount of thrust, while variation in the differential pitch primarily affects the amount of shaft torque required.

[0063] Likewise, the example of FIG. 6B involves six-blade rotor 600b with blades labeled sequentially around their axis of rotation as blades 601b, 602b, 603b, 604b, 605b, and 606b. The rotors 6A and 6B can be identical physically, but are operated differently. It should be noted the blades of rotor 600b can be grouped into two groups of three equispaced blades (e.g., group 1 comprising 601b, 603b, and 605b; group 2 comprising 602b, 604b, and 606b) or three groups of two opposing blades (e.g., group 1 comprising 601b and 604b; group 2 comprising 602b and 605b; group 3 comprising 603b and 606b). In the scenario of two groups of three equispaced blades, energy dissipation is achieved while maintaining constant thrust in hover by introduction of differential pitch between groups 1 and 2. Group 1 blades are set at a blade pitch for thrust decreased below their normal hover value, while group 2 blades are set for increased thrust, such that the total thrust of the rotor is maintained, as discussed above.

[0064] In the scenario of three groups of two opposing blades, energy dissipation while maintaining constant thrust in hover can be achieved through introduction of differential pitch between any one of groups 1, 2, and 3, and subgroups thereof. For example, group 1 blades can be set at a blade pitch for thrust decreased below their normal hover value while group 2 and 3 blades are set for increased thrust, such that the total thrust of the rotor is maintained. Likewise, group 1 and 2 blades can be set at a blade pitch for thrust decreased below their normal hover value while group 3 blades are set for increased thrust, such that the total thrust of the rotor is maintained. Further, each of group 1, 2, and 3 blades can be set at a different pitch (and respective different thrust) such that increases and decreases in thrust from each group balances out to maintain the total thrust of the rotor.

[0065] An example envisions an Optimum Speed Tiltrotor with two 36-foot diameter rotors of 13.5% solidity each. In hovering flight at 400 RPM, with each rotor producing a thrust of 12,000 lb, differential collective using IBC can produce torque variations of over 3,000 ft-lb while maintaining constant or controllable thrust. Aircraft maneuver is accomplished by varying thrust as needed, modulated by variations in the average pitch of all blades.

[0066] The time response of the torque modulation achieved through differential collective depends on the speed with which the blades can be moved in pitch combined with the time for the flow field to adjust to the modified blade angles. These time delays can be less than a second, and in some cases less than a tenth of a second. Thus IBC-based differential torque represents a quickness improvement over torque modulation achievable using turboshaft engines alone.

[0067] Optimum Speed Rotors

[0068] To achieve high rotor efficiency in rotor borne and in wingborne flight, a sustained rotor operation over a wide range of rotor RPM (such as 20% to 100%) is necessary. To this end, contemplated embodiments utilize rotor designs having stiffened blades, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,298 (Karem) Optimum Speed Rotor (OSR) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,641,365 (Karem) Optimum Speed Tilt Rotor (OSTR), incorporated herein by reference.

[0069] Using the OSR and OSTR teachings, aircraft contemplated herein preferably achieve flap stiffness of each blade that is not less than the product of 100, or even more preferably 200, times the rotor diameter in feet to the fourth power, as measured in lbs-in.sup.2, at 30% of the rotor radius as measured from a center of rotor rotation.

[0070] Also, using the OSR and OSTR teachings, each blade weight in lbs preferably does not exceed the product of 0.004 times the diameter of the rotor in feet cubed.

[0071] Even Vs Odd Blade-Count Propellers and Rotor

[0072] The above descriptions treat opposing blades in pairs to avoid creation of undesirable pitching or yawing moments perpendicular to the shaft axis. Thus, most practical applications of the invention will utilize propellers with even numbers of blades, as seen in FIGS. 1, 2A, 2B 5A, 5B, 6A, and 6B. But in applications where perpendicular moments can be tolerated, similar methods could be used with IBC propellers having odd numbers of blades, as in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 4.

[0073] Deployment in Aircraft

[0074] FIGS. 1-3B depict deployments of systems of the inventive subject matter in various aircraft, and in various configurations.

[0075] FIG. 1 depicts aircraft 100 with rotor systems 110 and 120. Rotor systems 110 and 120 employ the systems of the inventive subject matter, including air braking systems and flight maneuver systems. For example, embodiments are contemplated where rotor system 110 employs a first type of system (e.g., air braking, flight maneuver, etc) and rotor system 120 employs a second type of system (e.g., air braking, flight maneuver, etc). rotor systems 110 and 120 can employ the same type of system (e.g., both flight maneuver, both air braking, etc) or can each employ a different type of system (e.g., rotor system 110 is flight maneuver, rotor system 120 is air braking). It is further contemplated that a single rotor system can employ more than one system of the inventive subject matter, for example rotor system 110 can employ both flight maneuver and air braking systems at the same time, or can selectively engage one of the flight maneuver system or the air braking system from time to time.

[0076] Thus, the systems employed by the aircraft can be variable and/or application-specific, providing drastically increased maneuverability (e.g. employing two flight maneuver systems), substantially increased air braking (e.g., employing two air braking systems), or a balance between increased flight maneuverability and increased air braking (e.g., employing both air braking and flight maneuver systems, in isolation or combination). While rotor systems 110 and 120 are tilt rotor systems, it should be appreciated that other rotor systems are contemplated. Further, it should be appreciated that rotor systems are contemplated that comprise even or odd numbers of blades.

[0077] It is contemplated that systems of the inventive subject matter be deployed in an aircraft such that a forward rotor is used for air braking, with the power generated by such air braking transferred electrically to an aft rotor, such that the aft rotor uses the excess energy to generate thrust. Such an application is well suited for conditions where it is desirable to greatly dissipate energy. Alternatively, or in combination, such systems can be used to store regenerated energy from the air braking system back into a battery system of the aircraft.

[0078] FIG. 2A depicts aircraft 200 with rotor system 210a, which employs one (or a combination) of the systems of the inventive subject matter (e.g., flight maneuver system, air braking system, etc). While FIG. 2A depicts rotor system 210a as a single rotor systems, it should be appreciated multi rotor systems are also contemplated. For example, FIG. 2B depicts rotor system 210b, which is a dual rotor system comprising rotor 202 and rotor 204. Rotors 202 and 204 share a common drive shaft (not depicted), but it is contemplated that rotors 202 and 204 can each be driven by a different drive shaft that are torque-linked together. It is contemplated that rotor system 210b can employ various systems of the inventive subject matter in isolation or combination as described with respect to FIG. 1.

[0079] FIG. 3A depicts aircraft 300a with rotor systems 310a and 320a arranged in a side-to-side configuration and as described with respect to FIG. 1.

[0080] FIG. 3B depicts aircraft 300b with rotor systems 310b and 320b arranged in a front-to-back configuration, where rotor system 310b is positioned toward the fore of aircraft 300b and rotor system 320b is positioned toward the aft of aircraft 300b. The rotor systems are as described herein.

[0081] It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms comprises and comprising should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.