System and Methods for Nuclear Waste Conversion into Non-Radioactive State

20180350477 ยท 2018-12-06

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    The systems with a combination of a) methods to orient and/or stabilize the radioactive material to a magnetic axis and b) a delivery or reflection method of particles at a specific angle relative to the induced orientation to improve the penetration of said particles past the electrons shell into the nucleus for nuclear decay at a rate faster than the standard half-life calculations or similar reflection methods and systems to redirect decay-expulsion particles back at the preferred angles that increase the target material decay rate. Includes methods of pre-preparation of material, and in production use to extend useful periods of materials such that disposal of used materials deeper in their life when it is already less radioactive.

    Claims

    1. I claim: a system consisting of: a method to orient base physical material of a particular Periodic Chart Element relative to the magnetic axis of the atom's nucleus, or for multiple atoms, all or a subset of atoms; a method to propel a particle, particles, or a grouping or groupings of particles at sufficient approach speed to pass a low-electron-deflection-energy channel in the electron shell into the nucleus; a method to orient that approaching particle flow at an angle of inclination, calculated as the low-electron-deflection-energy channel for that Element, relative to the induced magnetic field axis of their aligned portion of the target material such that the path balances the forces of exterior electrons in a lower repulsion energy channel from exterior to the nucleus between the electrons and delivers said material to area of the target nucleus; and this system is applied to create a change in the nucleus particle count of the target material.

    2. Claim 1 where the preferred angle of attack is limited to a range +/90 degrees relative to the induced magnetic field for target radioactive materials not one of the elements 095-Am-Americium, 096-Cm-Curium, 097-Bk-Berkelium, 109-Mt-Meitnerium, 110-Ds-Darmstadtium, and 111-Rg-Roentgenium.

    3. Claim 1 where the temperature of the environment for the interaction is reduced so orientation improves.

    4. Claim 3 and a method that includes braking of atomic bonds of the target material and causing atomic bonds to form in an environment with strong magnetic orientation.

    5. I claim: Claim 1 and where radioactive material uses a method to get atoms better aligned magnetically before use in its function, including but not limited to a crystallization process in the presence of a strong magnetic field.

    6. I claim: a system consisting of: a method to orient base physical material of a particular Periodic Chart Element relative to the magnetic axis of the atom's nucleus, or for multiple atoms, all or a subset of atoms; a method to propel a particle, particles, or a grouping or groupings of particles at sufficient approach speed to pass a low-electron-deflection-energy channel in the electron shell into the nucleus; a method to orient that approaching particle flow at an angle of inclination, calculated as the low-electron-deflection-energy channel for that Element, relative to the induced magnetic field axis of their aligned portion of the target material such that the path balances the forces of exterior electrons in a lower repulsion energy channel from exterior to the nucleus between the electrons and delivers said material to area of the target nucleus; and this system is applied to create a change in the nucleus particle count of the target material; and where the combined orientation and particle delivery system is done in segments of angle, segments of time, or combinations thereof, such that atoms for a range of alignments are processed with the combination alignment and particle delivery, then the combination gets applied to a difference range of atom alignments.

    7. Claim 1 where the events include a further material with high reflection properties of nucleus particles in combination with a focusing shape, including but not limited to a parabolic shape.

    8. Claim 7 and the reflective material is ionized to create higher rate of particle reflection.

    9. Claim 1 and a control systems measuring the output factors of the process to alter or stop the magnetics, angle, or those methods in combination.

    10. Claim 1 and where the magnetic alignment occurs via an electrostatic charge method.

    11. Claim 1 and where the system gets applied the radioactive material in another production process to extended life of the in-service resource.

    12. Claim 11 and the rate of delivery of particles is increased as material decays such that output level remains sufficient for other operations deeper into the material's decay cycle.

    13. Claim 1 and the deliver particles contain both neutrons and protons as a group.

    14. Claim 1 and the angles are calculated to include more than one Element in the target material.

    15. Claim 1 and where a method has been applied to the material to solidify in a crystallized structure.

    16. Claim 15 and where the material preparation, including but not limited to crystallization, has been applied in the present of a strong magnetic field.

    17. Claim 1 and where the target material has been prepared in the present of a strong electrostatic field, which achieves magnetic field alignment.

    18. Claim 1 and a method where the target material is added, including but not limited to the method of doping, into a different material in crystal structure, including but not limited to material formed a cubic crystallized structure.

    19. I claim: a system consisting of: a method to orient base physical material of a particular Periodic Chart Element relative to the magnetic axis of the atom's nucleus, or for multiple atoms, all or a subset of atoms; a method to reflect or redirect from the radioactive material its output of a particle, particles, or a grouping or groupings of particles at sufficient approach speed to pass a low-electron-deflection-energy channel in the electron shell into the nucleus; a method to orient that re-directed particle flow at an angle of inclination, calculated as the low-electron-deflection-energy channel for that Element, relative to the induced magnetic field axis of their aligned portion of the target material such that the path balances the forces of exterior electrons in a lower repulsion energy channel from exterior to the nucleus between the electrons and delivers said material to area of the target nucleus; and this system is applied to create a change in the nucleus particle count of the target material.

    20. Claim 19 and the reflection method is ionized to create additional negative charges that reflect additional particles.

    Description

    DETAILED DECRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0219] FIG. 1 depicts alternatives on electrons relative to nucleus particles at either closer than the Bohr radius, or outside the Bohr radius direction for the net force of electrostatic charge attraction versus nucleomagnetics repulsion in other directions versus the preferred embodiment of the present invention for delivering a nuclear particle, proton or neutron, to a target nucleus such that the path is balance between the nearby electron settling positions. In these, an electron is shown as a black sphere, and a nucleus as a ring with white in its middle. Electrostatic force is shown by an arrow with pattern interior, nucleomagnetics force is shown by an arrow with white interior, and the net force of those two is shown by a hashed-outline arrow. FIG. 1A, for locations outside the Bohr radius, depicts the net force (30102), as vectors, balances of electrostatic attraction (30105) versus nucleomagnetics repulsion (30103) between a nucleus (30103) and an electron (30104). Visually, it shows that the combination of the net force (30106) and the nucleomagnetics repulsion (30106) equals the electrostatic attraction (30103) by showing them as the same length in combination. FIG. 1B, for locations inside the Bohr radius, both forces (30113, 30115) are larger than in FIG. 1A (30103,30105) as shorter distance and the 1/d-factor. Given 1/distance-squared versus 1-distance-cubed, the nucleomagnetics force (30115) grows faster, so, as vectors, such that nucleomagnetics repulsion (30113) outweighs electrostatic attraction (30115) creating a net repulsion (30111). Visually, it shows that the combination of the net force and the nucleomagnetics repulsion equals the electrostatic attraction (30103) by showing them as the same length in combination.

    [0220] FIG. 2 depicts alternative directions versus the direction of the preferred embodiment of the present invention for delivering a nuclear particle, a proton or a neutron, to a target nucleus such that the particle or particles best pass the electrons in a shell/field around the target atom's nucleus. All directions utilize a target atom consisting of a nucleus (30204) and various electrons (30203, 30205) in settling positions around that nucleus. In an approach path (30202) for a particle (30201) in the general direction of an electron (30203), the particle gets repelled when closer than the Bohr radius by the net force as described in FIG. 1, and leaves (30206) without penetration to the nucleus. In a different approach path (30217) for an particle (30216) direction in somewhat near one (30203) to an electron, the particle gets first attracted inside the Bohr radius (30218), then repelled (30219) when closer than the Bohr radius, as described in FIG. 1, and leaves (30220) without penetration to the nucleus. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, approach path (30209) for an particle (30210) in a direction balance between the forces of the two closest electrons (30203) the particle first attracted by both, then gets repelled, when closer than the Bohr radius, by both, such that the particle (30210) penetrates the 30212) to the nucleus and creates a further nucleus reactions, often decay (fission) as in one preferred embodiment of the present invention, although sometimes that particle addition creates fusion.

    [0221] FIG. 3 depicts the Settling Locations of Electrons into Subshells and Open Path for Particle Approach. For an atom with a nucleomagnetics axis (30301) and a target nucleus (30306), the drawing depicts electrons in subshells starting as a subshell of one in each hemisphere (12), 6m2 (formerly called 6s2) (30302, 30308). The drawing depicts electrons in a subshell of three in each hemisphere (32), 6t6 (formerly called 6p6) (30303, 30307). The drawing depicts electrons in a subshell of five (5) in each hemisphere (32), 6u10 (formerly called 5d10) (30304). The drawing depicts electrons in a subshell of seven (7) in each hemisphere (72), 6t14 (formerly called 4f14) (30305). That leaves an open path (30309) for an approaching particle (30310) between two of the subshells (30306).

    [0222] FIG. 4 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 1 where atom or atoms get oriented by each's nucleomagnetics axis (30401) by a magnetic element (30402, 30404) and the particles (30406) are delivered along a path or direction (30405) at a particular angle (30407) for nucleus interaction at a higher rate than the than the natural state of random directions of approach.

    [0223] FIG. 5 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 9 a focusing element gets added to the FIG. 4 features for ejected particles to get reflected and refocused back at the target material at the calculated angle of the present invention. FIG. 5 depicts one embodiment of the present invention where atom or atoms get oriented by each atom's nucleomagnetics axis (30501) by a magnetic element (30502, 30504) and ejected particle or particles (30508) from the target molecules, which might be in a different angle from existing or trigger radioactive decay get reflected by an element (30507) such that the path or direction (30505) of the returning particle (30508) aligns with the preferred embodiment of the present invention for nucleus interaction at a higher rate than the than the natural state of random directions of approach, and reflected randomly.

    [0224] Table 6 depicts the two outer electrons subshells configurations for the element 092-U-Uranium. This was FIG. 192 of my prior U.S. application Ser. No. 15/490,870. FIG. 6 depicts two views of an atom of the element 092-U Uranium and its electron shells in the preferred embodiment of my prior filing. Each view is relative to the magnetic axis of the atom. FIG. 6A is an equator view showing the two most outer shells, in this case Shell-6 and Shell-7. FIG. 6B is a polar view of just the most outer shell, Shell-7, and its subshells, in this case, Subshell-7m. FIG. 6C is an equator view of just the most outer shell and its subshells, in this case, Subshell-7m and Subshell-7t.

    [0225] FIG. 6A shows the two outer shells, Shell-6 (19204) and Shell-7 (19206) of an atom of the element 092-U Uranium where there is a magnetic axis (19201) through the nucleus (19202), which defines a plane (19203) that separates the atom into two hemispheres (north and south). In Shell-6 (19204), which is full, there are eighteen (18) electrons as described in FIG. 136; six electrons not on the magnetic axis (19201) settle at a 36-degree angle (19206) to that magnetic axis (19201) with nucleus (19202) as the vertex, and ten electrons not on the magnetic axis (19201) settle at a 72-degree angle (19209) to that magnetic axis (19201) with nucleus (19202) as the vertex. In Shell-7 (19209), Subshell-7m includes two electrons, e-7m1 and e-7m2 (19221,19222), which settles on the magnetic axis (19201). Subshell-7t includes four electrons, e-7t1, e-7t2, e-7t4, and e-7t5, (19217,19221). There are no electrons in Subshell-7u or Subshell-7v.

    [0226] FIG. 6B shows the outer shell, Shell-z7, of an atom of the element 092-U Uranium, viewed from one magnetic pole (19276) shown as a point, because this 2D view is perpendicular to the page. Shell-7 includes Subshell-7m (19277). Two electrons settle in Subshell-7m (19276), one electron, e-7m1 (19261) in front and one electron (19260) in the back hemisphere. Subshell-7t includes four electrons, e-7t1, e-7t2, e-7t4, and e-7t5 (19268). There are no electrons in Subshell-7u or Subshell-7v.

    [0227] FIG. 6C shows the equator view of electrons and bonding positions of only the outer shell, Shell-6, of 092-U Uranium shows a magnetic axis (19240) with a plane (19241) through the nucleus separating the atom into two hemispheres. Two electrons (19242, 19243), e-5m1 and e-5m2, settles in Subshell-7m at the polar ends of the structure. Subshell-7t includes four electrons, e-7t1, e-7t2, e-7t4, and e-7t5 (19242). There are no electrons in Subshell-7u or Subshell-7v.

    [0228] For FIG. 7, the bottom shows the list of subshells with their settling angles between the electrons in that subshell relative to the magnetic axis angles with the nucleus as the vertex for the Element 109-Mt-Meitnerium. For the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 2, choosing the angle 90 degrees which is between the 6v14 north electrons subshells at 77 degrees and the 6v14 south at 77 degrees. However, there are other angles between ones on the table, if inner layers are further taken into consideration. The reader should note that the 90 degree angle is just one embodiment of the present invention for certain Elements. A person knowledge in the mathematics can determine other directions for improved delivery of particles.

    [0229] FIG. 7A shows the two outer shells, Shell-6 (30704) and Shell-7 (30706) of an atom of the element 109-Mt-Meitnerium where there is a magnetic axis (30701) through the nucleus (30702), which defines a plane (30703) that separates the atom into two hemispheres (north and south). In Shell-6 (30704), which is full, there are eighteen (18) electrons as described in FIG. 136; six electrons not on the magnetic axis (30701) settle at a 36-degree angle (30706) to that magnetic axis (30701) with nucleus (30702) as the vertex, and ten electrons not on the magnetic axis (30701) settle at a 72-degree angle (30709) to that magnetic axis (30701) with nucleus (30702) as the vertex. In Shell-7 (30709), Subshell-7m includes two electrons, e-7m1 and e-7m2 (30721, 30722), which settles on the magnetic axis (30701). Subshell-7t includes four electrons, e-7t1, e-7t2, e-7t4, and e-7t5, (30717, 30721). There are no electrons in Subshell-7u or Subshell-7v.

    [0230] FIG. 7B shows the outer shell, Shell-7, of an atom of the element 109-Mt-Meitnerium, viewed from one magnetic pole (30776) shown as a point, because this 2D view is perpendicular to the page. Shell-7 includes Subshell-7m (30777). Two electrons settle in Subshell-7m (30776), one electron, e-7m1 (30761) in front and one electron (30760) in the back hemisphere. Subshell-7t includes four electrons, e-7t1, e-7t2, e-7t4, and e-7t5 (30768). There are no electrons in Subshell-7u or Subshell-7v.

    [0231] It is important to note for FIG. 7 that electrons of this element, 109-Mt-Meitnerium, sit in the 90-degree subshells (30921), unlike most other elements. As such, the Claim 2 preference for 90 degrees does not apply to elements of this group as stated.

    [0232] FIG. 8 depicts that alternatives of using a proton versus using a neutron creates a net repulsions and difficulty of delivery into the nucleus for a proton versus a very strong attraction and very high delivery rate into the nucleus for a neutron. FIG. 8A depicts where it is a proton particle (30801) approaching a nucleus (30804). In that situation, the combination of particles creates a magnetic attraction (30805) and an electrostatic charge repulsion (30803) which creates a net repulsion (30807) which tends to deflect the path (30802) of the approaching proton particle (30801). FIG. 8B depicts where it is a neutron particle (30811) approaching a nucleus (30814). In that situation, the combination of particles creates a magnetic attraction (30815), yet no electrostatic charge repulsion (30813) which creates a relative full repulsion (30816) which tends to further attract the path (30812) of the approaching proton particle (30811). Similar to the event horizon of a black hole, for the neutron that is a horizon around a nucleus where capture an almost certainty. Yet, for protons that capture is limited as high speeds and the extra proton-proton repulsion may make capture limited.

    [0233] FIG. 9 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7 with both magnetic and cooling elements stabilize atoms, and methods delivery particles at a particular angle relative to the target nucleomagnetics axis. It depicts where atom or atoms get oriented by each's nucleomagnetics axis (30901) by a magnetic element (30902, 30904), and further stabilized in that orientation by cooling elements (30908, 30909), and the particles (30906) are delivered along a path or direction (30905) at a particular angle (30907) for target nucleus interaction at a higher rate than the than the natural state of random directions of approach.

    [0234] FIG. 10 depicts a 2D representation of the electron subshell placement relative to the nucleus and its nucleomagnetics axis for an atom of 088-Ra-Radium. It has a nucleus (31005) and its nucleomagnetics axis (31005). It has electrons on both hemispheres in groups at the same distance from the nucleus and inclination relative to the nucleomagnetics axis with the nucleus as the vertex, including: [0235] Subshell 1m (31008) [0236] Subshell 2m, 2c (31009) [0237] Subshell 3m, 3f (31006) [0238] Subshell 4m, 2c (31007) [0239] Subshell 5m, 2c (31004) [0240] Subshell 6m, 2c (31001) [0241] Subshell 7m (31002)

    [0242] FIG. 11 depicts the paths of approaching particles relative to the electrons in subshell 1m, which is closest to the nucleus. The presentation consists of a nucleus (31104) and its nucleomagnetics axis (31101). There are two electrons in subshell-1m: 1ml (31105) and 1m2 (31103) on either hemisphere created by the equator plane (31104) of the nucleus (31102). Approaching particle (31112), at the correct angle (31110), even to the left, in this drawing, of electron 1m2 (31103) get pulled towards the nucleus and get captured because the count of particles (protons and neutrons with magnetics) is high, and nucleomagnetics is stronger at subatomic distances. An approaching particle (31111) at the correct angle (31108) must be far to the right before proton-electron electron 1m2 (31103) nucleomagnetics repulsion to deflect the particles, and avoid capture.

    [0243] FIG. 12 documents the calculation of net-force for electrostatic and nucleomagnetics comparing an approaching neutron with an approaching proton. In the case of a neutron, there is not electrostatic force, so the only force is naked nucleomagnetics which is an attraction (negative force in physics). In the case of a proton, the nucleomagnetics is offset by electrostatic charge repulsion such that the net for is physics positive, and thereby repulsive at the chose distance.

    [0244] FIG. 13 shows a table of the natural half-life of radioactive elements, and their half-lives if just the particle delivery rate increase 30 by the 90:1 limitation of angle of the present invention.

    [0245] FIG. 14 shows a table of the natural half-life of radioactive elements, and their half-lives if both the particle delivery rate increase 30 by the 90:1 limitation of angle of the present invention, and that creates additional particles which can also get directed at the angle of the preferred embodiment of the present invention. In that case, the 30 increase in particles started will get 30-squared or 9,000 faster decay, and the new half-lives as documented by periodic chart element.

    [0246] FIG. 15 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7 which features adding a control system to the elements of FIG. 5. FIG. 5 depicts one embodiment of the present invention where atom or atoms get oriented by each atom's nucleomagnetics axis (31501) by a magnetic element (31502, 31504) and ejected particle or particles (31508) from the target molecules, which might be in a different angle from existing or trigger radioactive decay get reflected by a method (31507). In addition, in this embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7, the system has a monitoring device (31511) which take inputs, including but not limited to the radiation achieved, and has feeds back to change or stop (31512) the magnetics method (31502, 31504) or the particle delivery method (31510).

    [0247] FIG. 16 depicts one embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7 which includes particle alignment, particle delivery, or re-delivery at a particular angle, and a live production system. For an atom of radioactive material in a multi-atom solid, there is a nucleus (31603) and its nucleomagnetics axis (31601) where the nucleomagnetics axis of multiple atoms get aligned by a method (31602, 31604). At a calculated angle (31609), there is a delivery mechanism (31610) for particles (31608) to the nucleus (31603), and/or a reflection method (31607) to take ejected particle of prior radioactive decay (31606) and redirect those into that flow (31605) and the calculated angle (31609). That system is attached is a live production system (31611) which might be a heat exchanger for energy production.

    [0248] FIG. 17 depicts alternatives between the natural state of atoms, and their nucleomagnetics axis in natural state versus when a magnetic method is applied. FIG. 17A shows that, in a solid, there are multiple atoms (31701, 31702, 31703, 31704, 31705, 31706). However, one atom (31702) marked with a star (31707) would have an alignment and none of the others would. FIG. 17A shows the preferred embodiment of the present inventions such that, in a solid, there are multiple atoms (31701, 31702, 31703, 31704, 31705, 31706). Yet because of the magnetic alignment method (31718), groups of atom (317002, 31714, 31715) marked with starts (31717) with similar, but not sufficient alignment, would have a sufficient alignment by the added method for processing as a group.

    [0249] FIG. 18 depicts that nucleomagnetics alignment can occur by either applied magnetics or an applied electrostatic charge field. In FIG. 18A, repeats FIG. 17B, where a number of atoms (31802, 31804, 31805) get aligned by a nucleomagnetics method (31807) out of the full group of atoms (31801-31806) in a solid material. FIG. 18B shows the same results, where the nucleomagnetics method is an anode (31817), and cathode (31818) electrostatic field driving a consistent nucleomagnetics field of the atoms.

    [0250] FIG. 19 depicts that nucleomagnetics alignment can occur naturally for one-hemisphere-electron imbalance, also called 1/2 spin. In nature, as depicted in FIG. 19A, if the material has even-count Atomic Number, then all electrons have a balancing atom in the opposite hemisphere at the same inclination. As a result, not electron dipole occurs, and the nucleomagnetics axis do not align. This is shown as only one atom (31902) having a horizontal nucleomagnetics axis alignment which the rest do not. In that case, the decay rates is slower due to non-alignment. However, as depicted in FIG. 19B, in the case of odd-count Atomic Number, one hemisphere has an extra electron. Thereby, each atom has an electrostatic dipole, and thereby tend to align by electrostatic charge. The negative on one atom finds the positive end of another atom, which happens to increase nucleomagnetics alignment as well as shown by more atoms aligned (31912, 31914, 31915) versus not.

    [0251] FIG. 20 depicts the natural alignment of the nucleomagnetics axis, which leads to increased decay rate, for 87-Fr-Francium. It consists of two section; the first showing one atom alone and its solidifying structure, and the second showing that structure favors a strict alignment of the nucleomagnetics axis of that Element's atoms.

    [0252] FIG. 20A shows the outer subshells from an equator view. The atoms has a nucleomagnetics axis (32001). In Shell-7, there is only one electron, 7m1, (32002) which sits on the nucleomagnetics axis (32001). In Shell-6, also on the nucleomagnetics axis (32001), sits Subshell-6m, 6m1 (32003) and 6m2 (32009). Next, moving from axis to equator is the Subshell-6t (32004, 32008), then Subshell-6u (32005, 32007), and then Subshell-6v (32006). For the 2D, we have not shown that those outer shells have multiple electrons in them. The value of this drawing is that the 87-Fr-Francium Element atoms all have one electron, 7m1 (32002), sticking out directly on the nucleomagnetics axis (32001) as a structure (32010, and the opposite pole has its 6m2 electron (32009) at in indented positions (32012) because of the lower nucleomagnetics repulsion force between the nucleus and electrons along the axis versus other inclinations. This creates an electrostatic differential from the lone 7m1 electrons (32002) as a negative charge () (32011) towards the nucleus (32013) as a positive charge (+) (32014). Therefore, the atom expresses an electromagnetic dipole axis that is the same as the nucleomagnetics axis (32001).

    [0253] FIG. 20B depicts how multiple atoms of Element 87-Fr-Francium solidify with both nucleomagnetics axis and electrostatic dipole fully aligned. In a series of three depicted atoms (32012, 32015, 32016), the 6m2-electron indent (32013) of one atom (32012) attracts the 6m1-electron protrusion (32014) of the next atom (32015). On exactly the same axis, the electrostatic dipole from negative (32018) to positive (32019) of one atom (32012) attracts the electrostatic negative end (32020) of the next atom (32015). As a result, the forces are very strong to keep the atoms in a line for electrostatic force, and to keep the nucleomagnetics axis (32011) in line with the nucleomagnetics axis further (32017) in the atom solidifying structure.

    [0254] FIG. 21 calculates and displays as a graph with its R-square correlation percentage, the decay rates of natural radioactive element for the AVSC atomic model that the decay is based, exponentially, upon the ratio of the neutrons to the protons in the outer shell, and thereby more neutrons leads to a more stable atom, and a lower decay rate. At the left bottom, it the AVSC atomic model calculation of the nucleomagnetics nucleus structure up to 3-layers. As a result, as shown the bottom left, the 3D structure is 666 which is 216 particles, most likely as a cylinder with one row, the core empty, as the chance to get an isolated proton at the center is highly unlikely. The main table compares radioactive Elements, and target Uranium isotopes, for number of protons, the Atomic Number, total nucleus particles, the Atomic Weight, and thereby calculates the number of neutrons by subtraction. It adds the change between Elements for each other those, protons, total nucleus particles, and neutrons. The table further adds the natural decay rate of each Element or, and a ratio comparison of neutrons versus protons. The results of that table compares the Subshell-7t Elements in an x,y graph of excess ratio versus the decay rate to show and calculate the correlation. The view indicates an exponential relationship, and the calculation shows a 96% R-squared correlation predictive rate.

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0255] FIG. 1 depicts alternatives on electrons relative to nucleus particles at either closer than the Bohr radius, or outside the Bohr radius direction for the net force of electrostatic charge attraction versus nucleomagnetics repulsion in other directions versus the preferred embodiment of the present invention for delivering a nuclear particle, proton or neutron, to a target nucleus such that the path is balance between the nearby electron settling positions.

    [0256] FIG. 2 depicts alternative directions versus the direction of the preferred embodiment of the present invention for delivering a nuclear particle, proton, or neutron, to a target nucleus such that the particle or particles best pass the electrons in a shell/field around the target atom's nucleus.

    [0257] FIG. 3 depicts the Settling Locations of Electrons into Subshells and Open Path for Particle Approach.

    [0258] FIG. 4 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 1 where atom or atoms get oriented by each's nucleomagnetics axis (30401) by a magnetic element (30402, 30404) and the particles (30406) are delivered along a path or direction (30405) at a particular angle (30407) for nucleus interaction at a higher rate than the than the natural state of random directions of approach.

    [0259] FIG. 5 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 9 a focusing element gets added to the FIG. 4 features for ejected particles to get reflected and refocused back at the target material at the calculated angle of the present invention.

    [0260] Table 6 depicts the two outer electrons subshells configurations for the element 092-U-Uranium. This was FIG. 192 of my prior U.S. application Ser. No. 15/490,870.

    [0261] For FIG. 7, the bottom shows the list of subshells with their settling angles between the electrons in that subshell relative to the magnetic axis angles with the nucleus as the vertex for the Element 109-Mt-Meitnerium.

    [0262] FIG. 8 depicts that alternatives of using a proton versus using a neutron creates a net repulsions and difficulty of delivery into the nucleus for a proton versus a very strong attraction and very high delivery rate into the nucleus for a neutron.

    [0263] FIG. 9 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7 with both magnetic and cooling elements stabilize atoms, and methods delivery particles at a particular angle relative to the target nucleomagnetics axis.

    [0264] FIG. 10 depicts a 2D representation of the electron subshell placement relative to the nucleus and its nucleomagnetics axis for an atom of 088-Ra-Radium.

    [0265] FIG. 11 depicts the paths of approaching particles relative to the electrons in subshell lm, which is closest to the nucleus.

    [0266] FIG. 12 documents the calculation of net-force for electrostatic and nucleomagnetics comparing an approaching neutron with an approaching proton.

    [0267] FIG. 13 shows a table of the natural half-life of radioactive elements, and their half-lives if just the particle delivery rate increase 30 by the 90:1 limitation of angle of the present invention.

    [0268] FIG. 14 shows a table of the natural half-life of radioactive elements, and their half-lives if both the particle delivery rate increase 30 by the 90:1 limitation of angle of the present invention, and that creates additional particles which can also get directed at the angle of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.

    [0269] FIG. 15 depicts the preferred embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7 which features adding a control system to the elements of FIG. 5.

    [0270] FIG. 16 depicts one embodiment of the present invention for Claim 7 which includes particle alignment, particle delivery, or re-delivery at a particular angle, and that system is integrated with a live production systems.

    [0271] FIG. 17 depicts alternatives between the natural state of atoms, and their nucleomagnetics axis in natural state versus when a magnetic method is applied.

    [0272] FIG. 18 depicts that nucleomagnetics alignment can occur by either applied magnetics or an applied electrostatic charge field.

    [0273] FIG. 19 depicts that nucleomagnetics alignment can occur naturally for one-hemisphere-electron imbalance, also called 1/2 spin for Elements with or without 1/2 spin.

    [0274] FIG. 20 depicts the natural alignment of the nucleomagnetics axis, which leads to increased decay rate, for 87-Fr-Francium. It consists of two sections; the first showing one atom alone and its solidifying structure, and the second showing that structure favors a strict alignment of the nucleomagnetics axis of that Element's atoms.

    [0275] FIG. 21 calculates and displays as a graph with its R-square correlation percentage, the decay rates of natural radioactive element in comparison to the for the AVSC atomic model that the decay is based, exponentially, upon the ratio of the neutrons to the protons in the outer shell, and thereby more neutrons leads to a more stable atom, and a lower decay rate.