Pressure relief device integrity sensor
10139005 ยท 2018-11-27
Assignee
Inventors
- Geof Brazier (Woodbury, MN, US)
- John Tomasko (Limerick, IE)
- Liam Fitzgerald (Limerick, IE)
- Stephen Farwell (Owasso, OK)
- Hughie Leahy (Castletroy, IE)
Cpc classification
F16K37/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16K37/0083
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16K17/16
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y10T137/8158
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y10T137/1789
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
F16K17/16
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A sensor for sensing the integrity of a pressure relief device, along with associated systems and methods, are disclosed. The sensor may sense a designed area of weakness of a pressure relief device, such as an explosion vent or rupture disk. A monitor may monitor a signal from the sensor, which may be transmitted between the sensor and monitor by way of a sensor loop. In response to a change in the designed area of weakness, the signal from the sensor may be altered or interrupted, indicating that the designed area of weakness has changed. The signal from the sensor may be, for example, an electrical signal, optical signal, or an air flow in a pneumatic loop.
Claims
1. A pressure relief device integrity sensor, comprising: a sensor element configured to sense a condition of a pre-activation reactive region of a rupturable pressure relief device configured to activate by rupturing in response to a predetermined pressure, the sensor element configured to transmit a signal indicative of a normal condition; wherein the sensor element comprises a conductive element exhibiting a first resistance; wherein the conductive element is configured to deform in response to a compromise in the integrity of the pre-activation reactive region, and wherein the deformation of the conductive element causes the conductive element to exhibit a second resistance; and wherein a change in or interruption of the signal indicates a compromise in the integrity of the pre-activation reactive region before activation of the pressure relief device.
2. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 1, wherein the sensor element is configured to attach to the pre-activation reactive region of the explosion panel.
3. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 1, further comprising: a monitor; and a sensor loop transmitting the signal between the sensor element and the monitor.
4. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 3, wherein the sensor loop and sensor element comprise a normally closed circuit, and wherein the normally closed circuit is configured to open in response to the compromise in the integrity of the pre-activation reactive region.
5. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 1, wherein the deformable conductive element is a strain gage.
6. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 1, wherein the sensor element comprises at least one frangible fracture member.
7. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 1, wherein the sensor element comprises a wire.
8. A pressure relief device integrity sensor, comprising: a normally closed circuit configured to transmit a signal; wherein the normally closed circuit comprises a conductive element having a first resistance, wherein the conductive element is configured to deform in response to a non-activating change in at least one pre-activation reactive region of an explodable pressure relief device, and wherein the deformation of the conductive element causes the conductive element to exhibit a second resistance; and wherein a change in or interruption of the signal indicates that the pre-activation reactive region has been compromised.
9. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 8, wherein the normally closed circuit is configured to attach across the at least one pre-activation reactive region.
10. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 9, wherein the conductive element is configured to break in response to the non-activating change in the at least one pre-activation reactive region.
11. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 10, wherein the conductive element comprises a frangible fracture member.
12. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 10, wherein the conductive element comprises a wire.
13. The pressure relief device integrity sensor of claim 10, further comprising a tab, wherein the conductive element is configured to impinge on the tab in response to the non-activating change in the at least one pre-activation reactive region.
14. A system for sensing the integrity of a pressure relief device, comprising: a non-reversible pressure relief device having one or more pre-activation reactive regions; and at least one sensor element configured to transmit a signal indicating a condition of at least one of the one or more pre-activation reactive regions before the pressure relief device activates, wherein the sensor element comprises a conductive element exhibiting a first resistance; wherein the conductive element is configured to deform when the integrity of the pre-activation reactive region is compromised before activation of the pressure relief device, wherein the deformation of the conductive element causes the conductive element to exhibit a second resistance.
15. The system of claim 14, further comprising: a monitor configured to monitor the signal from the sensor element; and a sensor loop configured to transmit the signal between the sensor element and the monitor.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the sensor loop comprises a normally closed circuit.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the normally closed circuit is configured to open when the integrity of the pre-activation reactive region is compromised prior to activation of the pressure relief device.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the normally closed circuit comprises an electrical circuit.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the sensor element comprises a frangible member.
20. The system of claim 17, wherein the normally closed circuit comprises an optical circuit.
21. A method of monitoring a non-reclosable pressure relief device, comprising: sensing a condition of a pre-activation reactive region of the pressure relief device; transmitting a signal indicative of a condition of the pressure relief device, wherein the signal comprises an electrical signal having a voltage and a current; and changing or interrupting at least one of the voltage and current of the electrical signal to indicate a non-activating deformation of the pre-activation reactive region.
22. The method of claim 21, further comprising: triggering an alarm when the signal indicates the non-activating deformation of the pre-activation reactive region of the pressure relief device.
23. A pressure relief apparatus for a pressurized system comprising: a pressure relief device comprising an activating portion configured to relieve pressure by bursting or rupturing when pressure in the pressurized system exceeds a threshold, wherein the activating portion comprises a designed area of weakness and a pre-activation reactive region; and an integrity sensor configured to sense that the pressure relief device has weakened before activation, the sensor comprising a conductive element exhibiting a first resistance, wherein the conductive element is configured to deform and exhibit a second resistance when the pressure relief device has weakened before activation.
24. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the designed area of weakness comprises a score line.
25. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the designed area of weakness comprises a first score line and a second score line, wherein: the first score line and second score line define an angle between them; and the pre-activation reactive region is defined within the angle between the first and second score lines.
26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the integrity sensor is attached to the activating portion at the pre-activation reactive region.
27. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the pre-activation region is defined on a line bisecting the angle between the first and second score lines.
28. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the pre-activation reactive region overlaps with the defined area of weakness.
29. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the pre-activation reactive region is defined adjacent to the defined area of weakness.
30. The pressure relief apparatus of claim 24, wherein the score line defines an arctuate shape surrounding at least a portion of the activating portion.
31. The pressure relief apparatus of claim 30, wherein activating portion further comprises an indentation.
32. The pressure relief apparatus of claim 31, wherein the arctuate shape comprises a first end and a second end, wherein: the pressure relief device further comprises a hinge area between the first end and second end of the arctuate shape; the hinge area and the indentation define a line; and the pre-activation reactive region is defined on the line on the opposite side of the indentation from the hinge area.
33. The pressure relief apparatus of claim 32, wherein the integrity sensor is positioned adjacent to the pre-activation region.
34. A method of monitoring the integrity of a non-reclosing pressure relief device having a pre-activation reactive region, wherein the pressure relief device is installed with a pressurized system, comprising: sensing a strain at the pre-activation reactive region, wherein sensing a strain comprises deforming a conductive element to change the resistance of the conductive element; and generating a signal when the strain indicates that the pressure relief device has been deformed without activating.
35. The method of claim 34, further comprising: sensing a pressure of the pressurized system; wherein strain is sensed as a magnitude of strain; and wherein generating a signal further comprises generating a signal when the level of strain exceeds an allowable threshold level of strain at the sensed pressure.
36. The method of claim 34, further comprising: sensing the pressure of the pressurized system; calculating a rate of change of strain per unit of pressure; and wherein generating a signal further comprises generating a signal when the rate of change of strain per unit of pressure exceeds an allowable threshold.
37. The method of claim 34, further comprising: calculating a rate of change of strain per unit of time; and wherein generating a signal further comprises generating a signal when the rate of change of strain per unit of time exceeds an allowable threshold level at a magnitude of strain.
38. A method of monitoring the integrity of a rupturable pressure relief device configured to activate by rupturing in response to an overpressure, comprising: applying a pressure to the rupturable pressure relief device; measuring a strain of at least one region of the rupturable pressure relief device; identifying a pre-activation reactive region based on the strain measured at the at least one region of the rupturable pressure relief device; and monitoring a deformation of the pre-activation reactive region before activation of the pressure relief device; wherein monitoring a deformation of the pre-activation reactive region before activation of the pressure relief device comprises deforming a conductive element in response to the deformation, wherein deforming the conductive element causes a change in the resistance of the conductive element.
39. The method of claim 38, further comprising: identifying at least one magnitude of strain that indicates the rupturable pressure relief device has been compromised without activating.
40. The method of claim 39, wherein identifying at least one magnitude of strain comprises identifying a maximum safe allowable magnitude of strain.
41. The method of claim 38, wherein applying a pressure to the rupturable pressure relief device further comprises applying a plurality of pressures to the rupturable pressure relief device, and wherein measuring the strain of the at least one region of the pressure relief device further comprises measuring the strain at each of the plurality of pressures, the method further comprising: identifying at least one rate of strain per unit of time that indicates the pressure relief device has been compromised.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein identifying at least one rate of strain per unit of time comprises identifying a maximum safe allowable rate of strain per unit of time.
43. The method of claim 42, wherein identifying a maximum safe allowable rate of strain further comprises identifying a maximum safe allowable rate of strain per unit of time at a given magnitude of strain.
44. The method of claim 38, wherein applying a pressure to the rupturable pressure relief device further comprises applying a plurality of pressures to the rupturable pressure relief device, and wherein measuring the strain of the at least one region of the rupturable pressure relief device further comprises measuring the strain at each of the plurality of pressures, the method further comprising: identifying at least one strain at a threshold level of pressure that indicates the rupturable pressure relief device has been compromised.
45. The method of claim 44, wherein identifying at least one strain at a threshold level of pressure comprises identifying a maximum safe allowable strain at a threshold level of pressure.
46. The method of claim 38, further comprising: applying a sensor to the pre-activation reactive region.
47. The method of claim 38, wherein the rupturable pressure relief device is a first pressure relief device, the method further comprising: identifying a pre-activation region of a second pressure relief device corresponding to the pre-activation region of the pressure relief device; and monitoring a deformation of the pre-activation region of the second pressure relief device.
48. The method of claim 47, further comprising: applying a sensor to the pre-activation reactive region of the second pressure relief device.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments and together with the description, serve to explain principles of the disclosure.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
(18) Reference will now be made in detail to the present exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
(19) An exemplary embodiment of an integrity sensor of the present disclosure is shown in
(20) As shown in
(21) Sensor element 5 is positioned along a pressure relief device 30 containing a pre-activation reactive region 32. Pressure relief device 30 may be, for example, an explosion vent or rupture disk. Pressure relief device 30 may be installed with a pressurized system and may be designed to activatee.g., open, burst, or rupturein response to a predetermined pressure within the pressurized system. By activating, the pressure relief device 30 allows pressure to escape from the pressurized system. In one embodiment, the pressure relief device 30 may activate or initiate activation at the pre-activation reactive region 32.
(22) In some instances, the pre-activation reactive region 32 may become strained or compromised without activating. In those instances, the pre-activation reactive region 32 may undergo a physical change or deformation, such as, for example, stretching or compression. This physical change may be different from the change normally experienced by a pre-activation reactive region 32 during activation, and may indicate that the pressure relief device 30 and/or pre-activation reactive region 32 is abnormal or damaged. Alternatively, this physical change may be similar to the change undergone by a pre-activation reactive region 32 during the activation process, except the activatione.g., opening, bursting, or rupturinghas not been completed. Physical changes or deformations that do not immediately result in complete activation may be referred to generally as non-activating changes Similarly, the physical condition of a pressure relief device that has not completely activated may be referred to generally as a pre-activation condition. Monitoring such non-activating changes and/or pre-activation conditions allows monitoring the integrity of a pressure relief device. A pressure relief device 30 with a deformed pre-activation reactive region 32 may have lost integrity, may operate abnormally or unpredictably, and may require replacement. Additionally, a deformed pre-activation reactive region 32 may indicate that activation of the pressure relief device is imminent. Thus by monitoring non-activating changes and/or pre-activation conditions, an operator may replace the pressure relief device 30 before full activation occurs.
(23) To determine whether a non-activating change evidences damage to a pressure relief device, one may first determine the expected strain or deformation at the pressure relief device's maximum allowable working pressure (or at a pressure slightly above that maximum level). In an operational pressure relief device, if the magnitude of strain or deformation exceeds that expected level, then the pressure relief device may have been (or is being) compromised.
(24) In addition to magnitude of strain or deformation, other measures may indicate that a pressure relief device has suffered (or is suffering) an integrity-compromising non-activating change. For example, the rate of strain on a pressure relief device may be used. In one embodiment, the rate of strain may be calculated as strain per unit of pressure. In another embodiment, the rate of strain may be calculated as strain per unit of time. In either embodiment, if the rate of strain exceeds maximum allowable levels, then the pressure relief device may have undergone (or be undergoing) an integrity-compromising deformation. In addition or alternatively, the strain rate may be compared to the magnitude of pressure acting on the device. In that case, if the strain rate exceeds a maximum allowable rate at a given pressure, the pressure relief device may have undergone (or is undergoing) an integrity-compromising deformation. In one example, if strain continues to increase when pressure is held constant, then the pressure relief device may be compromised. To prevent false alarms, a rate-of-strain value may be compared to the magnitude of strain. In this manner, a relatively high rate-of-strain value may be disregarded when the actual strain value is within safe levels.
(25) Returning to
(26) In one embodiment, the sensor element 5 and sensor loop 10 may be made of a suitable conductive material capable of carrying or transmitting an energy signal. In addition, the sensor element 5 and sensor loop 10 may be made of a plurality of conductive materials, each of which being capable of carrying or transmitting an electric signal. Thus, expensive materials, such as tantalum or silver, may be used sparingly within the sensor 5 and sensor loop 10, if at all. In one embodiment, an expensive material, such as tantalum or silver, may be used to form the sensor element 5 while a less expensive material, such as insulated copper wire, may be used to form the sensor loop 10. Thus tantalum or silver, which may be desirable for their corrosion resistance, tensile strength, and other physical properties, may be used only where such materials can be of most usee.g., adjacent a predetermined area of weakness, or where exposed to corrosive environments. Insulated copper wire or other less expensive materials can be used where the particular properties of tantalum or silver, e.g., are not required.
(27) In one embodiment the sensor element 5 may comprise a conductive wire 412 attached to a frangible fracture member 414 as best shown in
(28) When attached or integral to the pressure relief device 30, the sensor 5 and sensor loop 10 may be electrically isolated from the material of pressure relief device 30 in order to prevent contamination or dissipation of a sensor signal running through the sensor 5 and sensor loop 10. In addition, the sensor 5 and sensor loop 10 may be electrically isolated from the pressure relief device 30 to prevent the ignition of dust or gas in or around the pressure relief device 30. The sensor 5 and sensor loop 10 may be electrically isolated by, for example, insulating tape (such as DuPont Kapton polyimide tape) or by use of an insulated wire for at least part of the sensor 5 and/or sensor loop 10.
(29) Additionally or alternatively, isolation may not be necessary where electrical current is not present or is safe. For example, the sensor loop 10 and sensor element 5 may comprise a fiber optic monitoring circuit in which no electrical current is present, or the sensor loop 10 and sensor element 5 may comprise an intrinsically safe electrical circuit (such as a zener circuit). Such a circuit would allow operation in hazardous environments, such as National Electrical Code (NEC) Class 1 Divisions 1 or 2 and Class 2 Divisions 1 or 2 environments and European ATEX Zone 0 or lower and Zone 20 or lower locations. For added safety, the sensor loop 10 and/or sensor element 5 may be electrically grounded.
(30) In another embodiment, the sensor loop 10 may be a pneumatic loop, which does not necessarily use an electrical signal. In this embodiment, the sensor loop 10 may comprise, for example, a small diameter hollow tube, and the sensor element 5 may comprise a segment of the small diameter hollow tube. The sensor loop 10 is a closed loop and air flow through the tube constitutes a normal condition of the closed circuit. A monitoring device may monitor the air flow with, for example, a spinning wheel or other device for detecting air flow. When sensor loop 10 in the form of a tube is cut or broken at sensor element 5 in response to a change in the pressure relief device 30, the circuit is broken and air flow through the pneumatic loop will cease. Cessation of air flow may signal to the monitor 20 that the pressure relief device 30 has been compromised without activating or is about to activate.
(31) In yet another embodiment, the sensor loop 10 may be a pressurized pneumatic loop whose pressure is monitored by a monitor 20. The sensor element 5 may comprise part of the pressurized pneumatic loop. If the pneumatic loop is broken at sensor element 5, the pressure will drop. Alternatively, a change in shape of the tube at sensor element 5 may cause a change in pressure. For example, if the tube is crimped at sensor element 5, pressure may increase. A change in pressure of the sensor loop 10 in the form of a pneumatic loop may signal to the monitor 20 that the pressure relief device 30 has been compromised without activating or that activation is imminent. Thus, an operator may know to replace the pressure relief device 30 before activation or before secondary complications from a compromised pressure relief device occur.
(32) Returning to
(33) In operation, a pressure relief device 30 is installed in a first, uncompromised state. A sensor element 5 and/or sensor loop 10 may be attached across or attached directly to a pre-activation reactive region 32 of the pressure relief device 30. With the pressure relief device 30 in its uncompromised state, the sensor loop 10 forms a circuit with sensor element 5, allowing the monitor 20 to continuously monitor a signalsuch as a trickle currentin the sensor loop 10. When the pressure relief device 30 is compromised or strained without activating, such as, for example, by deformation in a pre-activation reactive region 32, it may undergo a physical change that can be registered by the sensor 5. Sensor 5 may transmit a signal to or through sensor loop 10.
(34) In one embodiment, the sensor loop 10 initially forms a normally closed circuit. This circuit may be, for example, an electrical circuit, optical circuit, or pneumatic circuit. When the pressure relief device 30 is compromised or strained without activating, the sensor loop 10 may be broken at sensor element 5, creating an open circuit. The monitor 20 may interpret the opening of the circuit to mean that the pressure relief device 30 has been compromised or that activation is imminent.
(35) In another embodiment, the sensor loop 10 initially forms a closed electrical circuit with sensor 5, the closed circuit having a first resistance. When the pressure relief device 30 is compromised or strained near pre-activation reactive region 32, the sensor element 5 may be stretched or deformed, thereby altering its resistance and the resistance of the electrical circuit. For example, if sensor element 5 is stretched, its diameter may decrease, which increases its resistance. The monitor 20 may interpret a change in the electrical circuit's resistance to mean that the pressure relief device 30 has been compromised without activating or that activation is imminent. In a related embodiment, if the pressure relief device 30 subsequently is further compromised or activates, the sensor element 5 may break completely and open the initially closed electrical circuit. The monitor 20 may interpret the circuit's opening to mean that the pressure relief device 30 has been further compromised or has activated. Thus, the sensor loop 10 and sensor 5 may be able to detect both that the pressure relief device 30 has been compromised without activating and that the pressure relief device 30 has been activated.
(36) As shown in
(37) In another embodiment, shown in
(38) When the pressure relief device 230 is in a first, uncompromised state, the sensing device 250 may transmit a first signal to a monitor 220. When the pressure relief device 230 deforms at the pre-activation reactive region 232, the sensing device 250 may transmit a second signal, different from the first signal, to the monitor 220, thereby signaling that the pressure relief device 230 has been compromised without activating or is about to activate. An appropriate sensing device 250 may include, for example, one or more strain gages (as illustrated in
(39) Although the integrity sensor has been described as monitoring the integrity of a single pre-activation reactive region, the present disclosure also comprehends an integrity sensor that monitors a plurality of pre-activation reactive regions. In the embodiment illustrated in
(40) As best illustrated in
(41) As shown in
(42) When one or more of the designed areas of weakness 332 of vent 330 deforms without activation, sensor element 305 may be broken (opening a normally closed circuit) or stretched (increasing the resistance in the circuit), thereby signaling that the explosion vent 330 has been compromised. To facilitate breaking the sensor element 305 upon deformation of a designed area of weakness, the sensor element(s) 305 may include one or more frangible fracture members 414 placed adjacent to a designed area of weakness 332. As previously described and illustrated at
(43) An integrity sensor may be designed to stretch in response to strain on the pressure relief device. In such a design, the integrity sensor may be provided with one or more sensing devices in the form of a strain gage 552. These strain gages 552 may be positioned across a pre-activation region in the form of a designed area of weakness 532 as illustrated in
(44) When a strain gage 552 is used with the present disclosure, it may be placed into a bridge circuit (not shown), such that when the strain gage 552 stretches or compresses (in unison with the surface of the pressure relief device), the voltage across the bridge circuit changes. The voltage change across the bridge circuit may be slight; therefore, an amplifier (not shown) may be placed in the circuit to boost the signal to more measurable levels. In one embodiment, the signal may be monitored or tracked, for example, by software or an oscilloscope. The bridge circuit may be mounted in an electrical enclosure external to the pressure relief device, with only the strain gage 552 being exposed to the pressure relief device.
(45) In one embodiment, the strain gage 552 may be selected for its compatibility with the material of the pressure relief device to which it is attached. Temperature may affect the behavior and/or shape of both the strain gage and the pressure relief device. Accordingly, in one embodiment, the material of a strain gage may be selected to match the material of the pressure relief device.
(46) In another embodiment, the strain gage 552 may be mounted in an electrically insulating material (not shown). A pressure relief device may be electrically conductive. For this reason, mounting the strain gage 552 in electrically insulating material, or otherwise electrically isolating the material from the pressure relief device, may prevent the signal through the strain gage from running to ground or dissipating through the pressure relief device.
(47) In yet another embodiment, the strain gage 552 may be rigidly bonded to the pressure relief device. By rigidly bonding to the pressure relief device, the strain gage 552 may move in unison with the pressure relief device.
(48) The strain gage 552 of the present disclosure may be applied to the outlet side of the pressure relief device. The outlet side of a pressure relief device may be more benign than the inlet side. For example, the inlet side of a pressure relief device may be subject to corrosive or abrasive conditions. Therefore, placing the strain gage 552 on the outlet side of the pressure relief device may isolate it from such conditions. It is contemplated, however, that the strain gage 552 may be positioned on the inlet side of a pressure relief device. In such an application, the strain gage 552 may be protected from adverse conditions. For example, the strain gage 552 may be protected by way of a protective barrier against harmful electrical, mechanical, or chemical elements. Moreover, it is contemplated that two strain gages 552 may be usedone each on opposing inlet and outlet sides of a pressure relief device. In such an arrangement, both strain gages 552 may be placed into a bridge circuit (with one being inverted). By this arrangement, the signal generated at a given pressure could be maximized.
(49) In yet another embodiment, the strain gage 552 may utilize a low voltage and/or low current. Such a low voltage or low current may be capable of operating at intrinsically safe power levels, enabling the strain gage to be applied in a hazardous combustible gas or vapor or dust environment. For example, such a strain gage 552 may be placed safely into a combustible gas or vapor media piping system.
(50) While an individual strain gage is illustrated in
(51) An integrity sensor including a strain gage 552, as illustrated in
(52) Similarly, in a reverse acting rupture disk 730 (wherein a convex side of the disk faces the pressurized system P), as illustrated in
(53) A more detailed view of a strain gage placed across a score line is illustrated in
(54) In another embodiment of an integrity sensor according to the present disclosure, a sensor loop 910 may connect to a sensor element 905. The sensor element 905 may extend across and/or attach to a designed area of weakness 932 and be constrained by an element having a sharp edge, such as, for example, sharp tab 939 as shown in
(55) An integrity sensor according to the present disclosure may be placed at any desired pre-activation reactive region.
(56) In one embodiment, a rupture disk 1030 may be provided with four surface features 1080 in the form of score lines. In this embodiment, the rupture disk 1030 is designed to burst along the pattern formed by the score lines 1080, such that the rupture disk 1030 creates four petals upon rupture. The score lines 1080 may be designed such that at lower pressures, the score lines 1080 actually act as a support for the rupturable portion 1033. In such an embodiment, as pressure on the rupturable portion 1033 increases, the rupturable portion 1033 may experience greater deformation at the center of each petal (e.g., at position E) than at each score line 1080. Only after the pressure on the rupturable portion 1033 increases beyond a threshold level does the rupture disk deform sufficiently at the score lines 1080 so as to cause a rupture. In such an embodiment, it has been shown to be particularly effective for sensing the integrity of a rupture disk 1030 when a sensor 1070 is positioned at the center of one or more petals of the rupturable portion 1033. Thus, in one embodiment, an angle is defined by score lines 1080a and 1080b. A line Y-Y bisects the angle . A sensor may, for example, be positioned along line Y-Y, such as illustrated by sensors D, E, and F in
(57) The above embodiment is exemplary only, and it is contemplated that a rupture disk may be designed so that the pre-activation reactive region is created in a position other than the center of a petal formed by score lines, and a sensor may be placed at that alternative pre-activation reactive region. In addition, although the rupture disk of
(58) In an embodiment illustrated in
(59) While sensors have been described as being attached to or adjacent to a pre-activation reactive region of a pressure relief device, it is also contemplated that other types of sensors may be used with the present disclosure. For example, an optical measuring device 1271 may be used, as illustrated in
(60) Before an integrity sensor can be placed at a pre-activation reactive region, the pre-activation reactive region must be identified. Accordingly, the disclosure contemplates a method by which the pre-activation region may be identified and an integrity sensor applied. According to that method, a strain gage (such as strain gage 552 illustrated in
(61) While the above described embodiments of a pressure relief device integrity sensor have been depicted as utilizing an explosion panel or rupture disk, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to this particular structure. Therefore, alternative pressure relief devices are intended to be within the scope of this disclosure, including all equivalent structures for sealing engagement between two sections of different pressures. Also, although the above described embodiments have been depicted as monitoring the integrity of a pressure relief device before activation, this disclosure is not intended to be limited to that function alone. Therefore, embodiments of the described integrity sensor may also monitor additional parameters of a pressure relief device. Additionally, it is contemplated that individual features of one embodiment may be added to, or substituted for, individual features of another embodiment. Accordingly, it is within the scope of this disclosure to cover embodiments resulting from substitution and replacement of different features between different embodiments.
(62) The above described embodiments and arrangements are intended only to be exemplary of contemplated mechanisms and methods. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure herein.