ATAC-SEQ DATA NORMALIZATION AND METHOD FOR UTILIZING SAME

Abstract

The present invention relates to ATAC-seq data normalization for utilizing epigenetic information associated with chromatin openness, and a method for utilizing same. According to the present invention, it is possible to readily normalize and quantitatively compare ATAC-seq in various samples and various cohorts, and selected differential peaks can be used in various epigenetic studies, the diagnosis of diseases, and prediction of the prognoses of diseases.

Claims

1. A method for selecting normalization control peak for normalization of ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing), the method comprising steps of: a) aligning and peak calling cell-derived ATAC-seq data; b) selecting overlapped peaks between cell samples among the peaks called in step a); c) selecting a peak coincident with DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peak among the peaks selected in step b); and d) selecting a peak having a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 0.3 and peak width of less than 500 bp among the peaks selected in step c).

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the peak selected in step c) is located at a transcription start site (TSS) or 5′ untranslational region (5′ UTR).

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cell is one selected from the group consisting of cancer cells, stem cells, immune cells, inflammatory cells, epithelial cells, hematopoietic cells, and fibroblasts.

4. A normalization control peak selected by the method of claim 1.

5. The normalization control peak of claim 4 comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 232.

6. The normalization control peak of claim 5, wherein the normalization control peak includes one or more selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 20.

7. A method for selecting ATAC-seq normalization factor (F), the method comprising steps of: a) deriving an average height (k) of an individual normalization control peak selected from an individual sample by dividing the area of the individual normalization control peak selected by the method of claim 1 by a peak width in an individual sample in a cohort as shown in the following formula: Average Height (k) of an Individual Peak $k=\frac{\mathrm{area}}{\mathrm{width}}=\frac{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{sum}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{enrichment}\mathrm{within}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{peak}}{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{base}\mathrm{length}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{peak}};$ b) selecting m number of normalization control peaks existing in the individual sample in the cohort, and deriving a mean height (h), which is a mean value of the average heights (k) of the selected m number of normalization control peaks, through the following formula: Mean Height (h) of Selected Peaks in Each Sample $h=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^m{k}_i}{m},k_i=\frac{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{area}{A}_i\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{ith}\mathrm{peak}}{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{base}\mathrm{length}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{ith}\mathrm{peak}}$
m=the number of selected peaks in a sample; and c) deriving an ATAC-seq normalization factor (F) through the following formula: $F_{\mathrm{ab}}=\frac{s_a\left(=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^{n_a}{h}_{\mathrm{ai}}}{n_a}\right)}{h_{\mathrm{bj}}}\mathrm{for}1\le a\le b\le 2$
h.sub.ai=the mean height of the ith sample in the cohort C.sub.a
h.sub.bj=the mean height of the jth sample in the cohort C.sub.b
n.sub.a=the number of samples in the cohort C.sub.a

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the mean height (h) represents a degree of chromatin openness of the individual sample.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein m, which is the number of the normalization control peaks selected in the sample, is 5 to 50.

10. A method of normalizing the area value of a peak, wherein the method comprising multiplying the ATAC-seq normalization factor (F) selected by the method of claim 7 as in the following formula:
Normalized area(A)=F.sub.ab×A.sub.q wherein F.sub.ab is defined as follows: $F_{\mathrm{ab}}=\frac{s_a\left(=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^{n_a}{h}_{\mathrm{ai}}}{n_a}\right)}{h_{\mathrm{bj}}}\mathrm{for}1\le a\le b\le 2$
h.sub.ai=the mean height of the ith simple in the cohort C.sub.a
h.sub.bj=the mean height of the jth sample in the cohort C.sub.b
n.sub.a=the number of samples in the cohort C.sub.a and A.sub.q represents an area value of the q-th peak of the j-th sample of the cohort C.sub.b.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein m, which is the number of the normalization control peaks selected in the sample, is 5 to 50.

12. A method of selecting a differential peak for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, the method comprising steps of: a) aligning and peak calling ATAC-seq data from patients who respond to anti-PD-1 therapy and those who do not; b) selecting a peak which is distinct from the responding and non-responding patient samples from among the peak calling values of step a); c) normalizing the selected peak area by multiplying a peak area value (A.sub.d) of the peak selected in step b) by the ATAC-seq normalization factor (F.sub.ab) selected by the method of claim 9 as in the following formula:
Normalized area(A)=F.sub.ab×A.sub.d; d) selecting a peak having a normalized area value exceeding a mean area value of the normalized peak area values obtained in step c) from among the peaks selected in step b); and e) selecting a peak in which a mean difference between normalized peak area values from among patient samples responding to and non-responding to anti-PD-1 therapy among the peaks selected in step d) satisfies significance p<0.05.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the peak calling of step a) is performed using two or more types of peak callers selected from the group consisting of HOMER (Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment) suite, Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq 2 (MACS2), and CisGenome, and wherein the selection of step b) is performed by selecting a commonly distinct peak from the two or more types of peak callers.

14. A differential peak for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, which is selected by the method of claim 13.

15. The differential peak of claim 14, wherein the differential peak selected by the method includes one or more selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299.

16. The differential peak of claim 15, wherein the differential peak includes one or more selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233, SEQ ID NO: 234, SEQ ID NO: 237, SEQ ID NO: 249, SEQ ID NO: 252, SEQ ID NO: 261, SEQ ID NO: 262, SEQ ID NO: 267, and SEQ ID NO: 268.

17. A biomarker composition for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, the composition comprising one or more predictive peaks selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299.

18. The biomarker composition of claim 17, wherein the predictive peak includes one or more selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233, SEQ ID NO: 234, SEQ ID NO: 237, SEQ ID NO: 249, SEQ ID NO: 252, SEQ ID NO: 261, SEQ ID NO: 262, SEQ ID NO: 267, and SEQ ID NO: 268.

19. The biomarker composition of claim 17, wherein the biomarker composition includes four or more of the predictive peaks.

20. The biomarker composition of claim 17, wherein the predictive peak recognizes differences in chromatin openness between patients responding to and non-responding to anti-PD-1 therapy to provide responsiveness information to anti-PD-1 therapy.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0018] FIG. 1 is a view schematically illustrating a protocol of the present invention for deriving a predictive peak (biomarker) using ATAC-seq.

[0019] FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a process of normalization control peak selection, differential peak selection, and predictive peak selection for predicting a prognosis for anti-PD-1 therapy from the normalized differential peaks.

[0020] FIG. 3 is a view illustrating a method and a used formula for deriving a normalization factor (F).

[0021] FIG. 4 is a view illustrating a normalization control peak selection and normalization process.

[0022] FIG. 5 shows the result of confirming the change in the normalization factor according to the increase in the number of normalization control peaks in order to select the optimal number of normalization control peaks (a) and the result of confirming the rank change of 121 differential peaks according to the increase of the normalization control peak (b).

[0023] FIG. 6A is a view illustrating a process of selecting 67 differential peaks. FIG. 6B is a view showing nine representative differential peaks (M1, 2, 5, 17, 20, 29, 30, 35, 36) among the selected differential peaks visualized in the complete response (CR)+partial response (PR) and progress disease (PD) groups.

[0024] FIG. 7A is a view illustrating the sensitivity and specificity of representative differential peaks, which are selected predictive peaks, through receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. FIG. 7B is a view illustrating a threshold, sensitivity, and specificity for determining the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy using differential peaks.

[0025] FIG. 8 is a view including the left portion showing the difference of the mean normalized area values in the responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups of representative differential peaks in the discovery cohort, the center portion showing confirmation of the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy according to ‘mean normalized area value threshold,’ and the right portion showing the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy by the differential peak, that is, results of comparing median progression-free survival (mPFS) based on chromatin openness.

[0026] FIG. 9 is a view showing the sensitivity and specificity of a representative differential peak in a discovery cohort.

[0027] FIG. 10 is a view showing the results of confirming the responsiveness to anti-PD-1 therapy by the combination of weighted score of predictive peaks in the discovery cohort. FIG. 10A includes a left portion showing the difference in the weighted score values in the responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups and a right portion showing the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy based on the weighted score minus the threshold. FIG. 10B is a view showing the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy by the differential peak, that is, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) based on chromatin openness.

[0028] FIG. 11 is a view showing the results of confirming the sensitivity and specificity for the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy using predictive peaks in the validation cohort.

[0029] FIG. 12 is a view showing the results of confirming the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy in the metastatic gastric cancer patient group by the combination of weighted score of predictive peaks in the validation cohort. FIG. 12A includes a left portion showing the difference in the weighted score values in the responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups and a right portion showing the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy based on the weighted score minus the threshold. FIG. 12B is a view of showing the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy by the differential peak, that is, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) based on chromatin openness.

[0030] FIG. 13 is a view showing the results of confirming the normalization control peaks in eight hematopoietic cells.

[0031] FIG. 14 is a view showing the results of confirming normalization control peaks in three acute myeloid leukemia cells.

[0032] FIG. 15 is a view showing the results of confirming normalization control peaks for normal bronchial epithelial cells, small cell lung cancer cells, normal prostate basal epithelial cells, small cell prostate cancer cells, and epidermal growth factor receptor-negative and positive glioblastoma.

BEST MODE

[0033] The present invention provides a method for selecting normalization control peak for normalization of ATAC-seq, the method including steps of: a) aligning and peak calling cell-derived ATAC-seq data; b) selecting overlapping peaks between cell samples among the peaks called in step a); c) selecting a peak coincident with the DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peak among the peaks selected in step b); and d) selecting a peak having a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 0.3 and peak width of less than 500 bp among the peaks selected in step c).

[0034] In the present invention, the term “peak” means a chromatin open region as a chromatin region accessible by Tn5 transposase.

[0035] Cell-derived ATAC-seq data of cell samples according to step a) of the present invention can be obtained by directly performing ATAC-seq using a cell sample to be confirmed or obtained from a public database. Alignment of read data may be based on a reference sequence, for example, mouse mm9, mouse mm10, human hg19, or human hg38 genome version of the genomic reference consortium database, and in the present invention, human hg19 version was used in a preferred embodiment.

[0036] Alignment of the obtained data and peak calling may be performed through methods known in the art, for example, alignment of the obtained read data may use a BWA, Bowtie, or Bowtie2 program, and peak calling may be performed by Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment (HOMER) suite, Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq 2 (MACS2) or CisGenome.

[0037] In the present invention, step b) is a step of selecting overlapped peaks between cell samples from among the peaks called in step a). In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, common overlapped peaks in various subsets of CD8.sup.+ T cells were primarily selected.

[0038] In the present invention, step c) is a step of selecting a peak coincident with the consensus peak of DNase I hypersensitivity among the peaks selected in step b). This is the step of selecting a peak that 100% matches the DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peak of the ENCODE project, making it suitable for data normalization for analysis of various samples and cohort data. In addition, the peak selected as described above has the characteristic of being located in a transcription start site (TSS) or a 5′ untranslational region (5′ UTR).

[0039] In the present invention, step d) is a step of selecting a peak having a coefficient of variation of peak area values less than 0.3 and peak width of less than 500 bp between selected peaks among the peaks selected in step c). Step d) is a step for obtaining more accurate normalization control from the selected consensus ATAC-seq peak. In order to satisfy the ‘consensus’ criterion that can distinguish between samples with small differences in ATAC-seq peaks, peaks are selected based on two criteria: i) the coefficient of variation is less than 0.3 and ii) the peak width is less than 500 bp. That is, this selects with low ‘variability’ between samples. Here, 500 bp means a peak width in a base pair scale including up to two nucleosomes.

[0040] In the present invention, the term “normalization control peak” refers to a peak with ‘consensus’ between samples and is used for normalization.

[0041] For example, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it was obtained by the method including steps of: obtaining peaks from ATAC-seq data of various CD8.sup.+ T-cell subsets to select overlapped peaks commonly found among all CD8.sup.+ T-cell subsets; and matching the selected peaks with the consensus peak discovered by the DNase I hypersensitivity assay of the ENCODE project—that is, the ‘DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peak to select the peak located at the transcription start site or 5’ untranslational region while having 100% coincident with these.

[0042] More specifically, in the present invention, the above steps were performed in ATAC-seq data of CD8.sup.+ T cells to identify a total of 32,485 overlapped peaks among all CD8.sup.+ T-cell subsets, and among them, 4,798 peaks having 100% consistent with the DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peak and located in the transcription start site or the 5′ untranslational region were selected. Thereafter, 533 consensus peaks identically identified in the ATAC-seq data of CD8.sup.+ T cells used in the study were selected once again, and the peak with a coefficient of variation between the selected peaks of less than 0.3 and peak width between the selected peaks of less than 500 bp was selected, and finally, 232 normalization control peaks for normalization of ATAC-seq were derived.

[0043] The normalization control peak obtained by the above method is conserved across various species and can be used universally as a control peak for normalization in various cell populations. Accordingly, the cell may be one selected from the group consisting of cancer cells, stem cells, immune cells, inflammatory cells, epithelial cells, hematopoietic cells, and fibroblasts, and preferably, for example, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), B cells, T cells, CD8.sup.+ T cells, CD4.sup.+ T cells, CD8.sup.+ T cells, CD14.sup.+ monocytes, acute myeloid leukemia cells, bronchial epithelial cells, small cell lung cancer cells, prostate basal epithelial cells, small cell prostate cancer cells, or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) negative and positive glioblastoma cells can be used for normalization of ATAC-seq data and its analysis. Particularly preferably, the cells may be immune cells.

[0044] The normalization control peak obtained through the method of the present invention may consist of sequences represented by SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 232. Accordingly, the normalization control peak may be at least one selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 232, and the selected peak may constitute a normalization control group. In addition, the normalization control peak may be at least one selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 20, and the selected peak may constitute a normalization control group. More detailed information about the normalization control peak is shown in Table 4.

[0045] All 232 normalization control peaks of the present invention may be used for subsequent normalization factor calculation and differential peak selection, but after determining the order by arranging the mean of the area values of all peaks from SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 232 in descending order, 5 or more normalization control peaks may be utilized according to the rank, for example, 5 to 232 peaks, preferably 5 to 50 peaks, preferably 20 to 50 peaks may be used. As shown in FIG. 5A, in order to reflect the effect of adding the number of normalization control peaks, pairwise variations for all series of F.sub.m and F.sub.(m+1) was calculated so that as the number of normalization control peaks increased, the normalization factor (F) gradually converged to one value. That is, when the number of normalization control peaks is 5 or more, the values of F.sub.m and F.sub.(m+1) gradually converge so that the number of normalization control peaks is preferably 5 or more, and from 50, the normalization factor (F) gradually converges to one value without change according to the increase in the number of normalization control peaks (m). Considering the efficiency of data processing, it is desirable to set the number of control peaks to 50 or less. Therefore, in the present invention, the normalization control peaks are arranged in descending order by arranging the mean of the area values of all control peaks from SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 232 to determine the order, and then 5 or more peaks may be selected and utilized according to the rank. For example, 5 to 232 peaks, preferably 5 to 50 peaks, 5 to 20 peaks, 20 to 50 peaks can be used. In this case, 20 preferred normalization control peaks that can be used are shown as SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 20.

[0046] In addition, the present invention relates to a method for selecting the normalization factor (F) for quantification of ATAC-seq analysis, the method including steps of:

[0047] a) deriving the average height (k) of an individual normalization control peak selected from an individual sample by dividing the area of the individual normalization control peak selected by the above method by the peak width in an individual sample in a cohort as shown in the following formula:

[0048] Average height (k) of an Individual peak

[00001]$k=\frac{\mathrm{area}}{\mathrm{width}}=\frac{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{sum}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{enrichment}\mathrm{within}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{peak}}{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{base}\mathrm{length}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{peak}};$

[0049] b) selecting m number of normalization control peaks existing in an individual sample in the cohort, and deriving a mean height (h), which is a mean value of the average heights (k) of the selected m number of normalization control peaks, through the following formula:

[0050] Mean Height (h) of Selected Peaks Ach Sample

[00002]$h=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^m{k}_i}{m},k_i=\frac{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{area}{A}_i\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{ith}\mathrm{peak}}{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{base}\mathrm{length}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{ith}\mathrm{peak}}$
m=the number of selected peaks in a sample; and

[0051] c) deriving an ATAC-seq normalization factor (F) through the following formula:

[00003]$F_{\mathrm{ab}}=\frac{s_a\left(=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^{n_a}{h}_{\mathrm{ai}}}{n_a}\right)}{h_{\mathrm{bj}}}\mathrm{for}1\le a\le b\le 2$
h.sub.ai=the mean height of the fifth sample in the cohort C.sub.a

h.sub.bj=the mean height of the jth sample in the cohort C.sub.b

n.sub.a=the number of samples in the cohort C.sub.a

[0052] The ATAC-seq normalization factor (F) normalizes the area of the peak region obtained by ATAC-seq, allowing quantitative comparison.

[0053] In the present invention, the term “discovery cohort” refers to a population for selecting a differential peak capable of predicting differentiation with respect to a condition of interest. The condition of interest may include various conditions expected or predicted to show a difference between samples according to the degree of chromatin openness, and the differentiation may be used in the same meaning as terms such as responsiveness and suitability.

[0054] In the embodiment of the present invention, a population to distinguish response and non-response, that is, responsiveness, to anti-PD-1 therapy as a condition of interest was used as a discovery cohort.

[0055] In the present invention, the term “validation cohort” refers to a population for validating the selected differential peak. In the validation cohort, the differential peak selected from the discovery cohort is applied to verify whether the selected differential peak can accurately predict the differentiation for the desired condition of interest.

[0056] In the above equation, when a=b, the discovery cohort and the validation cohort are the same, and the same normalization factor (F) is applied for normalization. In the embodiment of the present invention, the normalization factor (F) derived from the discovery cohort was equally applied to the validation cohort by making the discovery cohort and validation cohort the same.

[0057] In the present invention, the term “normalization factor (F)” is a factor for adjusting the openness value of ATAC-seq of each sample for quantitative comparison between samples and means a value obtained by dividing the mean height h for the “average height (k) of the normalization control peak” of all samples in the cohort by the mean height h of the normalization control peak selected from the sample to be analyzed. The normalization factor (F) used in the present invention is simpler and less system load for calculation compared to the conventionally used method. When data is processed by multiplying the normalization factor (F) by the peak area value, the area value can converge to the mean value of each group, allowing the quantitative adjustment. Therefore, ATAC-seq data collected from various samples and various cohorts can be adjusted using normalization factors (F), then utilized in the next analysis.

[0058] In the present invention, the mean height h means the mean height with respect to the “average height (k) of the normalization control peak” of the samples in the cohort, which means the chromatin openness of the individual samples. That is, the mean height (h) is the mean of k values present in the sample, and this value generally represents the chromatin openness of the normalization control peak of one sample.

[0059] In order to derive the normalization factor (F), 5 to 50 normalization control peaks present in individual samples in a cohort may be selected according to rank. As m, the number of normalization control peaks selected from the sample increases, the normalization value appears constant, so that normalization can be performed better. However, if the number is greater than a certain number, a better normalization effect according to the increase in the number of normalization controls is not confirmed, and the maximum effect is exhibited so that the number of optimal efficient normalization control peaks may be selected. The present inventors confirmed that the desired normalization could be sufficiently achieved by setting the number of normalization control peaks to 5 to 50, 5 to 20, and 20 to 50.

[0060] In addition, the present invention provides a method for normalizing the peak area of the ATAC-seq normalization factor (F) by multiplying the selected ATAC-seq normalization factor (F) as in the following formula:

Normalized area(A)=F.sub.ab×A.sub.q

[0061] in which F.sub.ab is defined as follows:

[00004]$F_{\mathrm{ab}}=\frac{s_a\left(=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^{n_a}{h}_{\mathrm{ai}}}{n_a}\right)}{h_{\mathrm{bj}}}\mathrm{for}1\le a\le b\le 2$
h.sub.ai=the mean height of the fth sample in the cohort C.sub.a

h.sub.bj=the mean height of the fth sample M the cohort C.sub.b

n.sub.a=the number of samples M the cohort C.sub.a,

[0062] and A.sub.q represents the area value of the q-th peak of the j-th sample of cohort C.sub.b.

[0063] In addition, m, the number of normalization control peaks selected in the sample in the method may be 5 to 50.

[0064] In the present invention, the “normalized area (A)” is the same as the “peak area of the normalization factor (F),” and the peak area is used to quantitatively compare “chromatin openness.”

[0065] In addition, the present invention provides a method of selecting differential peak for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, the method including steps of: a) aligning and peak calling ATAC-seq data from patients who respond to anti-PD-1 therapy and those who do not; b) selecting a peak which is distinct from the responding and non-responding patient samples among the peak calling values of step a); c) normalizing the selected peak area by multiplying the peak area value (A.sub.d) of the peak selected in step b) by the ATAC-seq normalization factor (F.sub.ab) selected by the method of normalizing as in the following formula; Normalized area (A)=F.sub.ab×A.sub.d; d) selecting a peak having a normalized area value exceeding a mean area value of the normalized peak area values obtained in step c) from among the peaks selected in step b); and e) selecting a peak in which the mean difference between normalized peak area values from among the anti-PD-1 therapy responding and non-responding patient samples among the peaks selected in step d) satisfies significance p<0.05.

[0066] The A.sub.d refers to the peak area value of the individual peaks selected in step b), and the normalized area of the individual peaks can be obtained by multiplying this by a normalization factor (F).

[0067] By selecting a peak having a normalized area value exceeding the mean of the normalized peak area values obtained in step c) from among the peaks selected in step d), a peak showing a distinct difference among all peaks can be selected and noise can be removed.

[0068] In the present invention, the term “differential peak” means a significant peak that appears differently between individuals as a result of ATAC-seq analysis, reflects different degrees of chromatin openness, and can be selected by the following method. Since the differential peak selected in the present invention is clearly different in responding patients and non-responding patients to anti-PD-1 therapy, it can be used as a biomarker for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy. In particular, it can use differential peaks selected as highly predictable as “predictive peaks.” Here, “predictive peak” is used interchangeably with “predictive marker” and “biomarker.”

[0069] The peak calling of step a) is performed using two or more types of peak callers selected from the group consisting of HOMER suite, MACS2, and CisGenome, and the selection of step b) is characterized by selecting a common distinct peak from the two or more types of peak callers, thereby increasing reliability.

[0070] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, among 2,560 differential peaks in the cohort, a peak exceeding a mean area value of the normalized area values by multiplying by a normalization factor (F) was selected. Thereafter, 121 differential peaks were selected by additionally selecting differential peaks in which the mean difference of normalized peak area values between the responder and non-responder groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). The list of normalized peaks in the normalization control sets of C.sub.5, C.sub.20, and C.sub.50 using the normalization control peak numbers 5, 20, and 50 (C.sub.5, C.sub.20, C.sub.50) in the differential peaks were compared. In these sets, 67 differential peaks shown in common without changing the order of the differential peaks were selected as predictive peaks finally confirming the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy.

[0071] The present invention relates to a differential peak for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy selected through the above method.

[0072] The differential peak is referred to herein as a predictive peak or a biomarker and may be one or more selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299, preferably one or more selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 241.

[0073] SEQ ID NOs: 233 to 241 are referred to as representative differential peaks in the specification of the present invention, and is the peak selected once again among the 67 differential peaks based on i) a large difference in the relative numerical values between the mean area values of the responder and non-responder groups, ii) a higher mean area value in the responder groups, or iii) the low variance between the area values of the peaks in the responder groups. They can provide information on the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy with high sensitivity and specificity based on a more pronounced difference in chromatin openness.

[0074] In addition, the present invention provides a biomarker composition for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, including one or more predictive peaks selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299, preferably SEQ ID NO: 233, SEQ ID NO: 234, SEQ ID NO: 237, SEQ ID NO: 249, SEQ ID NO: 252, SEQ ID NO: 261, SEQ ID NO: 262, SEQ ID NO: 267, and SEQ ID NO: 268.

[0075] In addition, the present invention provides a method of predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, the method including a step of detecting one or more predictive peaks selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299.

[0076] In addition, the present invention provides a use of one or more predictive peaks selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299 for predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy.

[0077] The description of the biomarker composition for predicting responsiveness applies equally to the responsiveness prediction method and responsiveness prediction use, and overlapping descriptions are excluded to avoid the complexity of the description.

[0078] The predictive peaks can effectively provide information on responsiveness prediction even with a single one, but when they are used in combination, responsiveness can be predicted with improved sensitivity and specificity. In particular, it was confirmed that only the combination of four predictive peaks achieved the optimal saturation point in sensitivity and specificity in the present invention.

[0079] Accordingly, the biomarker composition of the present invention may include a combination of four or more predictive peaks selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233 to SEQ ID NO: 299, preferably, a combination of four or more predictive peaks selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 233, SEQ ID NO: 234, SEQ ID NO: 237, SEQ ID NO: 249, SEQ ID NO: 252, SEQ ID NO: 261, SEQ ID NO: 262, SEQ ID NO: 267, and SEQ ID NO: 268, and most preferably, a combination of SEQ ID NO: 268, SEQ ID NO: 249, SEQ ID NO: 252, and SEQ ID NO: 262 (‘M36+M17+M20+M30’).

[0080] In the present invention, the predictive peak can be characterized in that it provides information on the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy by distinguishing the difference in chromatin openness between patients who respond to anti-PD-1 therapy and those who do not.

[0081] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail through specific examples, but the scope of the present invention is not limited by the following examples.

[0082] [Modes of the Invention]

[0083] Experimental Method

[0084] ATAC-seq library preparation and ultrahigh-speed sequencing

[0085] Nuclei isolated from CD8.sup.+ T cells underwent a transposition reaction using Illumina transposase in 1× Tagment DNA (TD) buffer. Library fragments were amplified using indexing primers from the Nextera kit (Illumina, San Diego, Calif., USA), and quantified. The quantified library was then verified by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland). The pool of indexed libraries was sequenced using Illumina NextSeq500 for 75 single-read base sequences and analyzed using the CASAVA (v. 1.8.2) base sequencing software (Illumina). Reads were checked using the FASTQC software to assess the quality of single-end or paired-end read sequences. For analysis, sequencing data of each sample required a Phred quality score and a total number of reads equal to or greater than 30 (Q30) and 20 million, respectively.

[0086] ATAC-Seq Alignment and Peak Calling

[0087] FASTQ data were processed using the Trimmomatic software to increase read quality (per-base sequence quality >30) prior to alignment in the human genome and then aligned to the primary assembly of the GRCh37/hg19 human genome (chr1˜22 and chrX) using the Bowtie2 software with the parameters ‘-k 4 -N 1-R 5-end-to-end’. Finally, aligned reads were converted into browser extensible data (BED) format using the ‘bedtools bamtobed’ parameter. The positive strand was offset by +4 bp and the negative strand was offset by −5 bp. Tn5 transposase occupied 9 bp during transposition.

[0088] Three peak callers were used to perform peak calling: HOMER suite, MACS2, and CisGenome. The aligned read information was used for peak calling with the HOMER suite using ‘findPeaks’ and the ‘-style factor-tbp 3-region’ option; MACS2 using ‘callpeaks’ and the ‘-nolambda-nomodel-shift 100-extsize 200’ option; and CisGenome using the ‘Read extension length=150 bp’, ‘Bin size=50 bp’, ‘Max gap=50 bp’, and ‘Min peak length=100 bp’ options. During peak calling, according to the guidelines of Encyclopaedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE), which blacklisted regions with a large number of aligned reads (ultra-high signal artifact, UHS), the regions were excluded from the resulting peaks. Signal tracks were generated using the HOMER suite with the ‘makeUCSCfile’ command and the ‘-fragLength 147-tbp 3-style chipseq-raw’ options and visualized in the UCSC genome browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/).

[0089] Peak Area Calculation

[0090] There are two methods for identification of accessible chromatin regions (open chromatin) by transposase marked as peaks: a method using peaks of various ranges or a method using peaks of a fixed range. The method using peaks of the fixed range may be beneficial in the analysis of large peaks or large datasets. When the peak size is small, the area excluded from the peak range may affect data analysis. Therefore, a method using peaks of various ranges (‘variable width peak’) was applied and analyzed using the Homer suite.

[0091] While comparing the overall chromatin accessibility (i.e., chromatin openness), limiting the range of the actual peak to a fixed range cannot accurately determine the degree of openness within the actual peak range. Thus, all sample data were concatenated into a single set and peak calling was performed using the HOMER suite for ‘variable-width peak’. Peak regions thus obtained corresponded to each peak in each sample. Instead of tag enrichments, peak area, representing the sum of tag enrichment, was calculated using each genome browser file such as bedGraphs. Briefly, bedGraphs were generated using the HOMER suite with the ‘makeUCSCfile’ command and the ‘-fragLength 147-tbp 3-style chipseq-raw’ options. The area of each peak was then calculated by summing height per base pair in the peak range using a genome browser track file. For each sample, the area of the q-th peak region was computed as follows:

[00005]$A_q={.Math.}_{p=X_q}^{Y_q}{d}_{\mathrm{pq}}.$

[0092] In the equation, d.sub.pq refers to the height per base pair at position p of the coordinate from start (X.sub.q) to end (Y.sub.q) of the q-th peak. Finally, the peak areas were used to quantitatively compare “chromatin openness.”

[0093] Statistical Analyses

[0094] Data were expressed as means±standard errors of the mean (SEM), and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare difference between groups. The progression-free survival (PFS) and median PFS (mPFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Groups were compared using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, Calif., USA) and R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The Cutoff Finder (http://molpath.charite.de/cutoff/) was used to determine an optimal threshold for chromatin openness to classify responding and non-responding patients who were receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. Through receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, the predictive accuracy of selected peaks was calculated. In all analyses, p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Example 1. Patient Group and Experimental Design

[0095] In order to predict the responsiveness of gastric cancer patients to anti-PD-1 therapy, characteristics of peripheral blood CD8.sup.+ T cells of metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients being treated with the anti-PD-1 therapy, Keytruda (pembrolizumab; Kenilworth, N.J., USA) were analyzed in this study. CD8.sup.+ T cells are the main target cells for anti-PD-1 therapy. The response to anti-PD-1 therapy is classified into progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR). It was confirmed that there was no significant difference in the frequencies of potential CD8.sup.+ T cells and PD-1+ CD8.sup.+ T cells between the patients in the group.

[0096] Chronic stress caused by factors such as pathogens, microbiota, acidity, hypoxia, glucose deprivation, and the tumor microenvironment can cause epigenetic alterations in cells that make up our body, which can also cause subtle alterations in immune cells that make up the immune system. Accordingly, the present inventors studied the epigenetic characteristics of CD8.sup.+ T cells in the peripheral blood of metastatic gastric cancer patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy, in particular, determined that the treatment prognosis of patients before anti-PD-1 therapy can be predicted by using the chromatin openness that is distinguished between the responder and non-responder groups to anti-PD-1 therapy and intended to develop a biomarker using the same.

[0097] This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Seoul National University Hospital (0905-014-280) and Samsung Medical Center (2015-09-053). Patients participating in the clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT #02589496) were designated as the discovery cohort. Patients with stage IV metastatic gastric cancer mGC (n=32) who were undergoing anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab were recruited, and blood was collected before treatment and every three weeks thereafter. In addition, from January to May 2018, a new cohort of patients with stage IV mGC (n=52) who were treated with pembrolizumab was recruited as the validation cohort. Patient information for the discovery and validation cohorts is presented in Tables 1 and 2. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Microsatellite instability (MSI) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive information for tumor specimens was obtained from a report of a previous study (Kim et al., Nat. Med. 2018).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Discovery Cohort Patient Characteristics Number of Age Response patients (n) (years) Total 33 56.7 ± 1.9 Complete response (CR) 2 62.5 ± 6.5 Partial response (PR) 8 59.3 ± 4.2 Stable disease (SD) 7 64.3 ± 5.2 Progressive disease (PD) 15 51.0 ± 3.7 Ages are presented as means ± standard errors of the mean (SEMs).

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Validation Cohort Patient Characteristics Number of Age Response patients (n) (years) Total 52 60.9 ± 1.4 Complete response (CR) 3 69.3 ± 6.6 Partial response (PR) 15 63.3 ± 2.6 Stable disease (SD) 12 61.3 ± 3.2 Progressive disease (PD) 22 58.0 ± 3.7 Ages are presented as means ± SEMs.

[0098] All CD8.sup.+ T cells were collected from blood samples of patients enrolled in a clinical trial phase II pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 therapy, and for each sample, the genome-wide assay was performed for Tn5 transposase-accessible chromatin using ATAC-seq.

[0099] Through this analysis, in the present invention, biomarkers were derived for distinguishing between responder and non-responder patients before anti-PD-1 therapy, and it was confirmed that the prediction method using these biomarkers could have high accuracy and sensitivity. A protocol schematically illustrating the method is shown in FIG. 1.

[0100] The published ATAC-seq data were used for quantitative ATAC-seq analysis, and the data used are shown in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Sample Total Aligned % % % TSS ID reads reads Aligned Duplicated Mitochondria NRF PBC FRIP enrichment SS01 79,369,131 72,958,765 91.9% 51.3% 31.4% 0.98 0.86 0.60 16.4 SS02 87,638,376 80,039,100 91.3% 43.0% 21.4% 0.98 0.83 0.47 16.0 SS03 126,685,260 115,837,870 91.4% 45.6% 21.2% 0.98 0.86 0.55 26.8 SS04 66,576,763 60,989,804 91.6% 43.1% 26.0% 0.98 0.89 0.64 28.2 SS05 69,794,733 63,072,918 90.4% 46.4% 26.2% 0.98 0.85 0.54 18.1 SS06 110,916,650 102,146,159 92.1% 46.1% 26.9% 0.98 0.86 0.53 11.9 SS07 87,534,113 80,315,836 91.8% 50.5% 29.0% 0.98 0.83 0.50 14.1 SS08 79,366,311 73,459,580 92.6% 41.6% 23.9% 0.98 0.88 0.53 15.7 SS09 111,528,381 102,440,329 91.9% 47.7% 21.2% 0.98 0.77 0.51 16.9 SS10 106,022,192 97,579,178 92.0% 46.6% 24.4% 0.98 0.83 0.51 21.3 SS11 71,755,642 66,493,486 92.7% 38.3% 20.8% 0.98 0.88 0.46 16.3 SS12 88,065,358 82,845,759 94.1% 47.2% 24.7% 0.98 0.82 0.42 14.3 SS13 64,060,244 60,505,431 94.5% 44.3% 21.5% 0.97 0.83 0.44 19.2 SS14 103,257,981 97,746,391 94.7% 39.3% 13.3% 0.98 0.76 0.51 16.8 SS15 124,158,216 116,490,224 93.8% 53.5% 16.8% 0.97 0.66 0.57 16.3 SS16 73,535,141 69,458,094 94.5% 36.6% 18.5% 0.98 8.83 0.53 21.9 SS17 84,446,831 79,526,537 94.2% 38.0% 14.7% 8.98 0.80 0.38 16.3 SS18 61,138,757 58,835,255 96.2% 36.3% 18.9% 0.99 0.87 0.49 26.6 SS19 74,499,318 71,572,361 96.1% 44.2% 21.4% 0.95 0.81 0.41 28.2 SS20 80,080,760 76,640,704 95.7% 41.4% 17.6% 0.98 0.80 0.48 16.1 SS21 70,826,527 67,917,053 95.9% 40.5% 18.0% 0.98 0.22 0.54 17.2 SS22 89,838,238 86,206,816 96.0% 45.4% 22.9% 0.97 0.83 0.48 14.0 SS23 25,306,813 69,825,407 92.7% 37.3% 18.0% 0.98 0.86 0.35 10.8 SS24 115,656,817 107,321051 92.8% 39.1% 14.7% 0.98 0.79 0.37 12.3 SS25 89,273,685 82,918,784 92.9% 49.1% 24.5% 0.98 0.79 0.42 15.3 SS26 107,117,518 99,277,606 92.7% 32.6% 11.6% 0.98 0.84 0.48 13.4 SS27 52,636,072 48,671,987 92.5% 38.5% 20.4% 0.98 0.87 0.44 15.8 SS28 64,582,832 60,171,173 93.2% 43.7% 23.8% 0.98 0.86 0.42 14.8 SS29 80,226,651 75,580,819 94.2% 57.0% 33.6% 0.97 0.51 0.46 23.0 SS30 101,999,249 95,839,289 94.0% 54.0% 30.3% 0.97 0.81 0.39 13.5 SS31 49,007,643 45,924,143 93.7% 30.1% 14.7% 0.98 0.89 0.61 24.0 SS32 114,145,932 107,358,491 94.1% 53.5% 24.7% 0.97 0.74 0.54 20.5 * NRF, non-redundant fraction; PBC, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) bottlenecking coefficient; FRIP, fraction of reads in peaks; TSS, Transcription start Site

[0101] In order to improve the working speed of the computer delayed by the size of the data used for analysis, the Euclidian distance method was used. In the analysis of human genome (hg19)-mapped ATAC-seq data, a two-step selection process was performed to have a normalization control peak selection for normalization as a pre-step to discover a differential peak that is distinguished between responder and non-responder groups and a differential peak selection, and this process and the process of deriving a ‘differential peak’ for finally predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy is shown in FIG. 2.

[0102] As shown in FIG. 2, after ATAC-seq library generation, each library pool was quantified using a Bioanalyzer and sequenced on a single lane of the NextSeq 500 system using 75-bp single reads. Sequencing read (fastq) files were mapped using the human genome database (hg19) and Bowtie v. 2.0 software. Further analysis was performed in two stages:

[0103] 1) Selection of a consensus peak among CD8.sup.+ T-cell subsets and selection of a control peak by matching it to the consensus peak known as a DNase I hypersensitive site (“normalization control peak” selection step) followed by normalization of peaks from each patient using the normalization control peaks (normalization step); and 2) final selection of predictive peak to distinguish response and non-response to anti-PD-1 therapy after normalization of the selected differential peaks. The normalization control peak and normalization step of step 1) are shown in more detail in FIG. 4.

Example 2. Selection of Normalization Control Peaks and Derivation of Normalization Factors (F)

[0104] The first selection step is to find a consensus peak to be applied as a normalization control and select it as a normalization control peak. That is, the normalization control group was determined for normalization from the results of CD8.sup.+ T cells ATAC-seq by the selection of peaks with low variability across samples. For this purpose, ATAC-seq data derived from the CD8.sup.+ T-cell subset including naïve and memory CD8.sup.+ T cells from PBMCs (GSE89308) obtained from healthy volunteers were used to screen control peaks for normalization. For all sample data, peak calling was performed using the HOMER suite to generate peak regions. Next, the area of selected peaks from each CD8.sup.+ T-cell subset was calculated using bedGraphs. After comparisons of CD8.sup.+ T-cell subsets, a total of 32,485 overlapped peaks were obtained among all CD8.sup.+ T-cell subsets using ‘findOverlaps.’ They were matched to the DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peak discovered by the ENCODE project located at the transcription start site (TSS) or 5′ untranslational region (5′ UTR), a transcriptionally active region of the genome, thereby selecting 4,798 peaks that matched 100% with DNase I hypersensitivity consensus peaks and were located on the TSS or 5′ UTR.

[0105] Among the selected peaks, 533 consensus ATAC peaks identified in the ATAC-seq data from CD8.sup.+ T cells used in this study were selected once again. Among the selected consensus ATAC-seq peaks, in order to satisfy the criterion of low diversity and showed high similarity between samples, two criteria with a coefficient of variation of less than 0.3 and a peak width of less than 500 bp were applied to select peaks. The peak width of 500 bp means a base pair size including up to two nucleosomes.

[0106] As a result, 232 ATAC peaks were selected, and they are shown in Table 4 below with information designating them. The numbers of the start and end positions of the peaks shown in Table 4 were designated based on hg19.

[0107] The 232 selected normalization control peaks shown in Table 4 are evolutionarily conserved among 17 species, and thus they may be useful for genomic studies of other species as well. In addition, it was confirmed that they could be applied to other cells such as CD4.sup.+ T cells and CD14+ monocytes, and the results are shown in Example 6 below in detail. Thereafter, the normalization control peak selected was applied for normalization in the cohort.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Selected normalization control peaks Chromo-     Control some Start End Symbol Annotation     C1 chr2 198,317,581 198,319,004 COQ10B Promoter, TSS 1 C2  chr10 97,453,104 97,454,237 TCTN3 5′ UTR 2 C3 chr3 93,698,438 93,699,698 ARL138 Promoter, TSS 3 C4 chr7 44,121,720 44,122,668 POLM Promoter, TSS 4 C5 chr7 124,569,281 124,570,400 POT1 Promoter, TSS 5 C6  chr11 124,980,971 124,982,078 TMEM218 Promoter, TSS 6 C7 chr5 112,311,713 112,313,144 DCP2 Promoter, TSS 7 C8  chr12 49,503,923 49,504,972 LMBR1L 5′ UTR 8 C9  chr11 73,881,841 73,382,698 PPME1 Promoter, TSS 9 C10  chr12 57,039,601 57,040,435 ATP5F1B Promoter, TSS 10 C11 chr5 149,339,838 149,340,820 SLC26A2 Promoter, TSS 11 C12 chr3 127,842,341 127,843,211 RUVBL1 Promoter, TSS 12 C13  chr16 72,042,308 72,043,066 DHODH Promoter, TSS 13 C14 chr2 197,503,899 197,504,911 CCDC150 Promoter, TSS 14 C15  chr10 99,446,579 99,447,600 AVPI1 Promoter, TSS 15 C16  chr12 54,712,365 54,719,307 COPZ1 Promoter, TSS 16 C17 ch5 68,462,420 68,463,306 CCNB1 Promoter, TSS 17 C18  chr20 13,619,031 13,620,138 TASP1 Promoter, TSS 18 C19  chr19 33,462,571 33,463,350 CEP89 Promoter, TSS 19 C20  chr19 104,359,038 104,360,317 TDG Promoter, TSS 20 C21 chr8 74,883,696 74,885,141 ELOC promoter, TSS 21 C22 chr3 186,287,767 186,289,030 DNAJB11 promoter, TSS 22 C23 chr3 99,979,029 99,980,513 TBC1D23 5′ UTR 23 C24 chr4 141,444,608 141,446,084 ELMOD2 promoter, TSS 24 C25  chr14 45,603,137 45,604,667 FKBP3 promoter, TSS 25 C26 chr7 102,003,917 102,004,669 LOC100630923 promoter, TSS 28 C27 chr9 131,842,917 131,843,849 DQPP1 promoter, TSS 27 C28  chr12 54,120,913 34,121,840 CALCOCO1 promoter, TSS 28 C29  chr14 23,398,267 23,399,495 LOC101926933 promoter, TSS 29 C30  chr16 2,205,033 2,205,927 SNHG19 promoter, TSS 39 C31  chr20 60,813,046 60,813,770 OSBPL2 promoter, TSS 31 C32 chr2 216,176,146 216,177,543 ATIC 5′ UTR 32 C33 chr1 202,317,372 202,318,359 PPP1R128 promoter, TSS 33 C34 chr7 149,535,044 149,536,019 ZNF862 promoter, TSS 34 C35  chr14 23,257,625 53,258,794 GNPNAT1 5′ UTR 35 C36 chr7 23,338,269 23,339,795 MALSU1 promoter, TSS 36 C37  chr17 46,124,877 46,126,026 NFE2L1 promoter, TSS 37 C38  chr15 100,273,047 100,274,120 LYSMD4 promoter, TSS 38 C39 chr1 36,614,610 36,615,677 TRAPPC3 promoter, TSS 39 C40 chr3 66,270,564 66,271,965 SLC25A26 promoter, TSS 48 C41 chrX 119,763,449 119,764,519 C1GALT1C1 promoter, TSS 41 C42  chr14 73,924,904 73,925,758 NUMB promoter, TSS 42 C43  chr10 104,004,821 104,005,489 GBF1 promoter, TSS 43 C44  chr20 23,338,203 23,339,458 LINC01431 promoter, TSS 44 C45 chr7 56,173,782 56,174,973 CHCHD2 promoter, TSS 45 C48 chr3 127,770,514 127,771,610 SEC61A1 promoter, TSS 46 C47 chr6 170,893,029 170,894,413 PDCD2 promoter, TSS 47 C48 chr2 27,008,384 27,009,106 CENPA promoter, TSS 48 C49  chr13 25,875,227 25,876,522 NUP58 5′ UTR 49 C50 chr3 14,692,665 14,693,338 CCDC174 promoter, TSS 50 C51  chr20 5,093,144 5,094,245 TMEM230 promoter, TSS 51 C52 chr6 88,299,162 88,300,219 RARS2 promoter, TSS 52 C53  chr12 58,145,785 88,146,823 CDK4 promoter, TSS 53 C54 chr6 111,279,278 111,280,465 GTF3C6 5′ UTR 54 C55 chr1 155,278,181 155,278,987 FDPS promoter, TSS 55 C56 chr4 185,654,644 185,655,789 CENPU promoter, TSS 56 C57  chr10 13,203,033 13,203,924 MCM10 promoter, TSS 57 C58 chr2 219,575,276 219,376,173 TTLL4 5′ UTR 58 C59 chr6 170,615,298 170,616,376 FAM120B promoter, TSS 59 C60  chr17 1,419,528 1,420,391 INPPSK promoter, TSS 60 C61  chr14 32,030,613 32,031,121 NUBPL promoter, TSS 61 C62  chr20 43,150,146 43,151,236 SERINC3 promoter, TSS 62 C63  chr19 36,504,997 36,505,620 LOC101927572 promoter, TSS 63 C64 chr7 150,075,855 150,076,741 ZNF775 promoter, TSS 64 C65  chr18 39,534,461 39,535,915 PIK3C3 promoter, TSS 65 C66 chr9 35,111,101 35,111,979 FAM2148 promoter, TSS 66 C67  chr20 49,126,527 49,127,249 PTPN1 promoter, TSS 67 C68  chr20 33,264,551 33,265,369 PIGU 5′ UTR 68 C69 chr9 127,905,442 127,906,255 SCAI promoter, TSS 69 C70  chr11 61,891,126 61,891,809 INCENP promoter, TSS 70 C71  chr12 49,463,427 49,464,134 RHEBL1 promoter, TSS 71 C72  chr19 11,456,825 11,457,389 CCDC159 promoter, TSS 72 C73  chr12 110,939,483 110,940,450 VPS29 promoter, TSS 73 C74 chrX 77,150,435 77,151,643 MAGT1 promoter, TSS 74 C75 chr6 49,430,355 49,431,624 MUT promoter, TSS 75 C76 chr1 203,764,424 203,765,127 ZC3H11A 5′ UTR 76 C77 chr3 128,902,187 126,903,439 CNBP promoter, TSS 77 C78 chr2 85,822,301 85,823,256 RNF181 promoter, TSS 73 C79 chr9 95,055,786 95,056,422 IARS promoter, TSS 79 C80 chr7 54,826,380 54,827,704 LOC100996654 promoter, TSS 80 C81  chr14 24,604,884 24,665,759 PSME1 promoter, TSS 81 C82 chr1 156,163433 156,164,073 SLC2544 promoter, TSS 82 C83  chr17 7,835,138 7,835,885 CNTROB promoter, TSS 33 C84 chr9 115,983,271 115,983,998 FKBP15 promoter, TSS 84 C85  chr18 21,082,699 21,083,898 RMC1 promoter, TSS 85 C86 chr2 69,663,818 69,665,064 NFU1 5′ UTR 86 C87 chr3 50,396,620 50,397,330 TMEM115 promoter, TSS 87 C88  chr10 104,263,341 104,264,065 SUFU promoter, TSS 88 C89  chr10 105,991,750 105,992,632 CFAP43 promoter, TSS 89 C90 chr6 31,125,807 31,126,453 CCHCR1 promoter, TSS 99 C91  chr16 81,348,085 81,349,123 GAN promoter, TSS 91 C92 chr6 32,095,827 32,096,372 ATF6B promoter, TSS 92 C93  chr12 114,403,635 114,404,675 RBM19 promoter, TSS 93 C94 chr2 97,405,416 97,406,226 LMAN2L promoter, TSS 94 C95 chr1 203,830,373 203,831,113 SNRPE promoter, TSS 95 C96  chr17 47,492,047 47,492,791 PHB promoter, TSS 96 C97  chr17 35,715,849 35,716,593 ACACA promoter, TSS 97 C98  chr19 36,119,454 36,120,170 RBM42 promoter, TSS 98 C99  chr19 39,935,545 39,936,590 SUPTSH promoter, TSS 99 C100 chr7 128,116,567 123,117,671 METTL28 promoter, TSS 100 C101  chr12 50,419,084 50,419,686 RACGAP1 promoter, TSS 101 C102  chr15 64,679,669 64,680,238 TRIP4 promoter, TSS M2 C103 chr3 48,481,320 48,482,057 TMA7 promoter, TSS 103 C104  chr19 49,990,391 49,991,067 RPLISA promoter, TSS 104 C105 chr9 34,178,559 34,179,245 UBAPI promoter, TSS 105 C106  chr19 11,266,326 11,266,924 SPC24 promoter, TSS 106 C107 chr1 54,665,221 54,666,231 CY35RL promoter, TSS M7 C108  chr22 18,586,359 18,560,921 PEX26 promoter, TSS 108 C109  chr12 56,727,306 56,728,289 PAN2 promoter, TSS 109 C110  chr17 41,277,224 41,277,747 BRCA1 promoter, TSS 116 C111  chr19 13,858,361 13,858,934 CCDC130 promoter, TSS 111 C112  chr19 5,977,894 5,978,520 RANBP3 promoter, TSS 112 C113  chr20 37,100,840 37,101,662 RALGAPB promoter, TSS 113 C114  chr22 30,234,080 30,234,725 ASCC2 promoter, TSS 114 C115  chr17 27,139,070 27,140,040 FAM222B promoter, TSS 115 C116  chr19 36,138,848 36,139,368 COX661 promoter, TSS 116 C117 chr7 128,095,471 128,096,320 HILPDA promoter, TSS 117 C118  chr19 11,708,005 11,708,637 ZNF627 promoter, TSS 118 C119  chr17 26,971,797 26,972,686 KIAA0100 promoter, TSS 119 C120 chr2 172,864,231 172,865,374 METAP1D promoter, TSS 120 C121  chr20 1,098,917 1,099,591 PSMF1 promoter, TSS 121 C122  chr20 37,590,596 37,591,507 DHX35 promoter, TSS 122 C123  chr19 51,611,543 51,612,188 CTU1 promoter, TSS 123 C124  chr12 51,477,051 51,477,666 CSRNP2 promoter, TSS 124 C125 chr7 44,240,271 44,240,926 YKT6 promoter, TSS 125 C126  chr15 59,396,962 59,397,659 CCNB2 promoter, TSS 126 C127 chr2 73,963,997 73,984,995 TPRKB promoter, TSS 137 C128 chr3 48,754,468 48,754,973 IP6K2 promoter, TSS 128 C129  chr10 105,156,089 105,156,683 PDCD11 promoter, TSS 129 C130 chrX 118,986,796 118,987,387 UPF3B promoter, TSS 130 C131 chr7 102,937,440 102,938,298 PMPCB promoter, TSS 131 C132  chr19 54,605,926 54,606,340 NDUFA3 promoter, TSS 132 C133 chr2 55,920,623 55,921,389 PNPT1 promoter, TSS 133 C134  chr20 44,044,468 44,044,977 PIGT promoter, TSS 134 C135  chr17 57,784,612 37,785,199 PTRH2 promoter, TSS 135 C136 chr1 43,311,917 43,312,416 ZNF691 promoter, TSS 136 C137  chr12 121,018,994 121,019,692 POP5 promoter, TSS 137 C138 chr2 234,762,839 234,763,530 HJURP promoter, TSS 138 C139  chr19 18,668,397 18,668,838 KXD1 promoter, TSS 139 C140  chr19 53,465,796 53,466,658 ZNF816-ZNF321P promoter, TSS 140 C141  chr12 57,881,460 57,882,173 MARS promoter, TSS 141 C142  chr19 45,873,666 45,874,137 ERCC2 promoter, TSS 142 C143  chr19 58,360,995 58,361,445 ZNF587 promoter, TSS 143 C144  chr22 35,795,783 35,796,265 MCM5 promoter, TSS 144 C145  chr12 124,118,029 124,118,558 GTF2H3 promoter, TSS 145 C145  chr19 1,039,781 1,040,256 ABCA7 promoter, TSS 146 C147 chr1 6,259,411 6,259,954 RPL22 promoter, TSS 147 C148  chr18 47,900,933 47,901,758 5KA1 promoter, TSS 148 C149 chr1 44,440,063 44,440,783 ATP6V0B 5' UT 149 C150 chr1 26,758,482 26,759,032 DHDDS promoter, TSS 136 C151  chr22 39,189,835 39,190,462 DNAL4 promoter, TSS 131 C152  chr17 5,094,839 5,095,522 ZNF594 promoter, TSS 152 C153  chr22 23,483,879 23,484,614 RSPH14 promoter, TSS 153 C154 chr9 131,591,658 131,592,394 SPOUT1 promoter, TSS 154 C155 chr8 37,707,049 37,707,721 BRF2 promoter, TSS 155 C156 chr9 44,079,591 44,080,138 XRCC1 promoter, TSS 156 C157  chr17 56,296,205 56,296,948 MKS1 promoter, TSS 157 C158 chr1 44,435,330 44,435,859 DPH2 promoter, TSS 158 C159  chr18 55,297,133 55,297,928 LOC100505549 promoter, TSS 159 C160  chr22 18,111,305 18,111,995 ATP6V1E1 promoter, TSS 160 C161 chr1 44,172,843 44,173,445 ST3GAL3 promoter, TSS 161 C162 chrX 129,299,437 129,300,425 AIFM1 promoter, TSS 162 C163  chr11 46,721,735 46,722,555 ARHGAP1 promoter, TSS 163 C164  chr19 7,694,281 7,694,827 XAB2 promoter, TSS 164 C165 chr3 124,448,809 124,449,799 UMPS promoter, TSS 165 C166 chr1 231,376,566 231,377,356 C1orf131 promoter, TSS 166 C167  chr19 2,819,568 2,820,267 ZNF554 promoter, TSS 167 C168 chr1 222,763,083 222,763,717 TAF1A-AS1 promoter, TSS 168 C169 chrX 48,554,647 48,555,337 SUV39H1 promoter, TSS 169 C170  chr20 62,496,100 62,496,814 TPD52L2 promoter, TSS 170 C171  chr16 2,509,755 2,510,317 TEDC2 promoter, TSS 171 C172  chr15 65,117,705 65,118,167 PIF1 promoter, TSS 172 C173 chr9 130,679,067 130,670,693 ST6GALNAC4 promoter, TSS 173 C174  chr19 19,249,083 19,249,488 TMEM161A promoter, TSS 174 C175 chr7 127,983,505 127,984,235 RBM28 promoter, TSS 175 C176  chr14 100,842,464 100,843,974 WDR25 promoter, TSS 176 C177  chr19 17,858,224 17,858,712 FCHO1 promoter, TSS 177 C178  chr11 68,816,050 68,816,709 TPCN2 promoter, TSS 178 C179 chr1 53,703,996 53,704,524 LOC100507564 promoter, TSS 179 C180 chr9 35,102,785 35,103,665 STOML2 promoter, TSS 186 C181 chr8 145,980,585 145,981,260 ZNF251 promoter, TSS 181 C182  chr16 1,993,129 1,993,666 MSRB1 promoter, TSS 182 C183 chr9 131,133,302 131,133,896 URM1 promoter, TSS 183 C184 chr6 31,774,452 31,774,898 LSM2 promoter, TSS 184 C185  chr20 48,732,309 48,732,751 UBE2V1 promoter, TSS 185 C186 chr1 33,502,358 33,502,787 AK2 promoter, TSS 186 C187  chr22 47,158,220 47,158,853 TBC1D22A promoter, TSS 187 C188 chr1 151,118,980 151,119,468 SEMA6C promoter, TSS 188 C189  chr12 57,940,810 57,941,242 DCTN2 promoter, TSS 189 C190  chr17 73,452,363 73,452,863 TMEM94 promoter, TSS 190 C191  chr15 74,753,150 74,753,777 U8L7 promoter, TSS 191 C192  chr15 90,895,226 90,095,796 ZNF774 promoter, TSS 192 C193  chr20 62,526,139 62,526,683 DNAICS promoter, TSS 193 C194 chrX 9,430,908 9,431,616 TBL1X promoter, TSS 194 C195 chr9 127,177,528 127,178,022 PSMB7 promoter, TSS 195 C196 chr1 39,456,512 39,457,243 AKIRIN1 promoter, TSS 196 C197 chr3 113,557,417 113,558,074 GRAMD1C promoter, TSS 197 C198  chr19 57,922,343 57,922,830 ZNF17 promoter, TSS 198 C199  chr15 44,092,539 44,093,175 HYPK promoter, TSS 199 C200 chr3 50,385,450 50,365,942 TUSC2 promoter, TSS 200 C201 chr6 32,143,699 32,144,130 AGPAT1 promoter, TSS 201 C202  chr11 3,078,509 3,078,932 CARS promoter, TSS 202 C203  chr11 67,236,528 67,237,017 TMEM134 promoter, TSS 203 C204 chr7 152,372,873 152,373,539 XRCC2 promoter, TSS 204 C205  chr17 3,749,353 3,749,872 NCBP3 promoter, TSS 205 C206  chr20 34,129,573 34,130,131 EBGIC3 promoter, TSS 206 C207  chr17 71,083,638 71,089,155 SLC39A11 promoter, TSS 207 C208  chr20 60,982,173 60,982,776 CABLES2 promoter, TSS 208 C209  chr19 49,954,957 49,955,341 PIH1D1 promoter, TSS 209 C210 chr3 48,646,854 48,647,360 UQCRC1 promoter, TSS 210 C211 chr5 141,258,478 141,259,116 PCDH1 promoter, TSS 211 C212  chr15 75,315,741 75,316,129 PPCDC promoter, TSS 212 C213  chr22 31,607,972 31,608,374 LIMK2 promoter, TSS 213 C214  chr17 28,804,115 28,804,621 GOSR1 promoter, TSS 214 C215 chr2 239,228,878 239,229,541 TRAF3IP1 promoter, TSS 215 C216  chr10 104,192,104 104,192,680 CUEDC2 promoter, TSS 216 C217 chr6 43,484,463 43,485,031 POLR1C promoter, TSS 217 C218 chrX 47,863,242 47,863,782 ZNF182 promoter, TSS 218 C219 chr1 226,270,903 226,271,686 UNC01703 promoter, TSS 219 C220 chr6 33,547,877 33,548,329 BAK1 promoter, TSS 220 C221 chr1 27,718,810 27,719,275 GPR3 promoter, TSS 221 C222 chr9 97,021,321 97,021,758 ZNF169 promoter, TSS 222 C223 chr1 40,997,054 40,997,617 ZNF684 5′ UTR 223 C224  chr19 55,574,368 55,574,744 RDH13 promoter, TSS 224 C225 chr8 23,145,369 23,145,952 R3HCC1 promoter, TSS 225 C226  chr14 71,067,168 71,067,834 MED6 promoter, TSS 226 C227 chr2 120,739,834 120,740,290 SIRT4 promoter, TSS 227 C228  chr17 28,443,500 28,443,993 NSRP1 promoter, TSS 228 C229 chr1 38,156,043 38,156,578 C1of109 promoter, TSS 229 C230 chrX 47,049,953 47,050,436 UBA1 promoter, TSS 238 C231  chr17 56,494,850 56,495,237 RNF43 promoter, TSS 231 C232 chr7 73,703,473 73,704,041 CLP2 promoter, TSS 232

[0108] Calculation of Normalization Factor (F)

[0109] Under the assumption that the shape of the selected control peak is different for each sample, the average height (k) of one peak is calculated by dividing the peak area of the normalization control peak by the peak width. As a result, it was converted into a simple figure as shown in FIG. 3. The mean height (h) of the entire control peak was obtained by dividing the sum of the average peak (k) of each of m number of normalization control peaks selected from a sample of one patient by m. That is, the mean height (h) is the mean of k values in one sample, and this value represents the chromatin openness throughout the normalization control peak of one sample. Finally, a normalization factor (F) was obtained by dividing h of all samples in the cohort by the mean height (h) of the selected peak in the sample to be normalized, that is, each sample in order to adjust the openness value of ATAC-seq peak of each sample for quantitative comparison between samples. A schematic diagram for the formula used and the formula are shown in FIG. 3.

[0110] The normalization factor (F) derived in this manner has the advantage that it can be calculated by a simpler and less system load method compared to the conventional method. The normalization factor (F) means a value obtained by dividing the mean height of the normalization control peak of all samples in the discovery cohort by the mean height of the normalization control peak of the sample to be analyzed. If this is multiplied by the area value of the peak region, the value converges to the mean of each group, allowing the amount to be corrected.

[0111] This is described in detail through the formula as follows. In order to follow a normal distribution, the discovery cohort C.sub.1 (Table 1) with sample size n.sub.1=32 and validation cohort C.sub.2 (Table 2) with sample size n.sub.2=52 were randomly selected. For each sample, the mean height (h) of the entire normalization control peak was calculated as follows.

[00006]$h=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^m{k}_i}{m}$

[0112] In the above formula, as the number m of normalization control peaks selected from the sample increases, the normalization value appears uniformly, allowing better normalization. In the present invention, the change in the normalization factor (F) was confirmed by changing the number of selected normalization control peaks from 1 to 232, which is further described with reference to FIG. 5. k is the average height of the i-th peak in the sample and is calculated as follows.

[00007]$k_i=\frac{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{area}{A}_i\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{ith}\mathrm{peak}}{\mathrm{the}\mathrm{base}\mathrm{length}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{ith}\mathrm{peak}}$

[0113] The peak area was calculated as the sum of the tag enrichment within the peak. Since the widths of the selected peaks in each sample mean the length of the base sequence, they were all considered equivalent, so the mean height of the derived control peaks, was used to represent the mean amount of the control peaks selected for each sample. For each integer pair (a, b) such that 1≤a≤b≤2, the normalization factor (F) was defined as:

[00008]$F_{\mathrm{ab}}=\frac{s_a\left(=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^{n_a}{h}_{\mathrm{ai}}}{n_a}\right)}{h_{\mathrm{bi}}}$

[0114] where h.sub.ai and h.sub.bj are the mean heights of the i-th and j-th samples in cohorts C.sub.a and C.sub.b, respectively. The normalization factor F.sub.ab compares the j-th sample in cohort C.sub.b with those of cohort C.sub.a. For example, f.sub.11 compares the j-th sample in discovery cohort C.sub.1 with those in discovery cohort C.sub.1. That is F.sub.11 means that the normalization factor of the discovery cohort is equally applied to the validation cohort. F.sub.12 compares the j-th sample in discovery cohort C.sub.1 with those in validation cohort C.sub.2, meaning that the discovery cohort and the validation cohort are different, and a normalization factor (F) is derived, respectively.

[0115] The peak areas of each sample were normalized by multiplying their normalization factors (F) as follows:

Normalized area (A)=F.sub.ab×A.sub.q

[0116] where F.sub.ab is the normalization factor calculated from the j-th sample in cohort C.sub.b with those in cohort C.sub.a and A.sub.q is the area value of the q-th peak in the j-th sample in cohort C.sub.b.

[0117] Hereinafter, the normalization factor (F) is used to normalize the differential peak, and in this case, the q-th peak means the differential peak of the sample.

[0118] FIG. 4 shows the normalization control peak selection and normalization process described above.

Example 3. Differential Peak Selection

[0119] As a second step, a differential peak was selected to identify the chromatin region among ATAC-seq data of CD8.sup.+ T cells that can reflect the clinical results of anti-PD-1 therapy. The discovery cohort shown in Table 1 was analyzed to select a differential peak that distinguishes response and non-response to anti-PD-1 therapy.

[0120] To select differential peaks from ATAC-seq data of CD8.sup.+ T cells in patients with gastric cancer who were receiving anti-PD-1 therapy, a responder group was chosen that included patients with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR); a non-responder group was chosen that included only patients with progressive disease (PD). That is, in the “selection step” to select the differential peak, the patient group with stable disease (SD) was excluded. Within the discovery cohort, the responder and non-responder groups were classified based on the clinical decision at a certain time point after finishing multiple cycles of anti-PD-1 therapy.

[0121] The responder and non-responder group data were pre-processed using the peak calling package, and as a result of peak calling detection using the peak callers Homer, MAC2, and CisGenome, 2,560 peaks commonly found in the three peak callers were selected to increase the reliability.

[0122] In order to quantitatively analyze the peaks distinguished between the responder and non-responder groups, the area values of 2,560 differential peaks in each sample were normalized using the normalization factor (F) value determined in the first step. In order to determine the number of normalization control peaks to be used at this time, Table 5 shows the normalization factors (F) calculated from three normalization control peak sets up to 5, 20, and 50 ranks according to rank.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Normalization factor (F) Sample Ranked Ranked Ranked Response ID ~5 ~20 ~50 Responders SS01 1.11 1.14 1.16 (CR + PR) SS11 1.05 1.07 1.09 SS04 1.07 1.11 1.14 SS06 0.95 0.96 0.98 SS08 1.01 1.06 1.06 SS10 0.75 0.75 0.75 SS12 0.92 0.97 0.57 SS13 0.90 0.92 0.91 SS28 0.97 1.02 1.04 SS29 0.90 0.91 0.93 Non- SS03 0.78 0.76 0.77 responders SS15 0.74 0.74 0.72 (SD) SS16 1.11 1.15 1.16 SS23 1.20 1.11 1.12 SS24 1.24 1.18 1.17 SS30 0.87 0.78 0.76 SS32 0.82 0.74 0.72 Non- SS02 0.90 0.94 0.95 responders SS05 1.03 1.06 1.08 (PD) SS07 1.07 1.04 1.02 SS09 0.82 0.82 0.82 SS14 1.39 1.38 1.37 SS17 1.44 1.36 1.33 SS18 1.29 1.36 1.41 SS19 1.05 1.10 1.10 SS20 1.13 1.12 1.11 SS21 0.93 0.97 0.96 SS22 0.82 0.84 0.83 SS25 0.97 0.99 1.02 SS26 1.15 1.04 1.02 SS27 1.27 1.25 1.24 SS31 1.44 1.42 1.43

[0123] Specifically, the F value and the corresponding normalized area of each sample converge to a constant value as the number of normalization control peaks (C.sub.5, C.sub.20, C.sub.50) increased, respectively, or the rank of the normalized area was kept in a stable state. The stabilization process and the selection process of multiple normalization control peaks are shown in FIG. 5.

[0124] As shown in FIG. 5, the number of control peaks to be used (1≤m≤232, m is an integer) was selected among the 232 normalization control peaks selected in Example 2 and Table 4, which were ranked in descending order according to the mean area of the sample peaks. Individual normalization factors (F) were calculated by the method confirmed in Example 2.

[0125] As shown in FIG. 5A, pairwise variation was calculated for all series F.sub.m and F.sub.(m+1) in order to reflect the effect of adding the normalization control peak. The gray vertical line represents the number of the normalization control peaks for peak normalization between samples. As the number of normalization control peaks increased, the normalization factor (F) gradually converged to one value. After the number of normalization control peaks exceeds 50, the normalization factor (F) gradually converged to one value without any change according to the increase in the number m of control peaks.

[0126] In FIG. 5B, for 121 differential peaks, F.sub.m was calculated according to the number of normalization control peaks, and they were sorted by normalized area values, respectively, and the rank change of each peak was visualized. In order to obtain normalized area values (A), when ATAC-seq data for 2,560 differential peaks identified in common in the three peak callers was normalized using F calculated with three normalization control sets (C.sub.5, C.sub.20, C.sub.50), the differential peaks were maintained without reversal of the rank. Therefore, it can be confirmed that normalization can be performed well because the rank of the differential peaks does not change and does not show a large fluctuation even if the number of controls is changed in the normalization control set or more. Therefore, a normalization control set of C.sub.5, C.sub.20, and C.sub.50 was used in the following.

[0127] A process of selecting a desirable predictive peak that can be used for prognosis prediction from the differential peak was additionally performed using the following two-step process.

[0128] First, as a first step, the mean of the normalized area values of the differential peaks among 2,560 differential peaks in the cohort was obtained. Distinct differential peaks with normalized area values exceeding the mean area values were selected. 121 differential peaks were selected by additionally selecting differential peaks in which the mean difference in normalized peak area values between the responder and non-responder groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). As a second step, normalized peak lists were compared in the normalization control sets of C.sub.5, C.sub.20, and C.sub.50 using normalization controls with the number of controls 5, 20, and 50 (C.sub.5, C.sub.20, C.sub.50) so that there was no reversal of the rank. In these sets, 67 differential peaks that appear in common without reordering the differential peaks were selected. The selected 67 differential peaks were ordered according to differences in the mean values shared by the three sets of controls. They were ranked by the relative distance between responder and non-responder groups, the area of each peak was divided by the largest area among all samples and then calculated means from each group.

[0129] The process of finally selecting 67 differential peaks among the 2,560 peaks described above is shown in FIG. 6.

[0130] As shown in FIG. 6A, three peak callers of Homer suite, MACS2, and CisGenome were used to select 2,560 differential peaks that distinguish anti-PD-1 therapy responder groups (complete response+partial response, CR+PR) and non-responder groups (progress disease, PD). 121 peaks were selected according to the criteria and calculation formula described above, and, finally, 67 peaks were selected. The 67 differential peaks were identically selected in the results processed with three sets of normalization control peaks (C.sub.5, C.sub.20, and C.sub.50).

[0131] Chromatin accessibility heatmaps represent normalized peak area values (rows) and patients (columns). Minimum and maximum area values are indicated in navy and yellow, respectively.

[0132] FIG. 6B is a view of showing the visual result of nine representative differential peaks (M1, 2, 5, 17, 20, 29, 30, 35, 36) among the selected 67 differential peaks using the genome browser of the University of California (Santa Cruz).

[0133] Nine representative differentiation peaks were selected based on three criteria: i) a large difference in the relative numerical values between the mean area values of responder and non-responder groups, ii) higher mean area values in responder groups, or iii) low variance between area values of peaks in responder groups.

[0134] The genome browser track in FIG. 6B shows nine differential peaks that serve as targets (predictive markers) predicting anti-PD-1 therapy responder groups (CR+PR, green) and non-responder groups (PD, red), which are used as a chromatin openness. The number above each differential peak denotes the target ID. The y-axis represents the adjusted read count according to the normalized area value calculated using the normalization factor (F). Scale bars indicate base pairs of 400 bp in base sequence length.

Example 4. Predictability Verification Using Selected Differential Peaks

[0135] In order to use the selected differentiation marker determined according to the normalized area value of the peak as a responsiveness prediction marker for anti-PD-1 therapy, the responsiveness prediction effect was verified. For verification, the Cutoff Finder online tool (http://molpath.charite.de/cutoff) was used to find the best cut-off values for use as predictive markers and response guidelines for anti-PD-1 therapy in patients who were receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. The threshold was determined by comparing the responder and non-responder groups to minimize the Euclidean distance between the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The threshold of each differential peak was determined as follows: first, the predictive performance of the threshold for each differential peak was estimated according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Then, the discriminative ability of the threshold for both groups was assessed by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (ACC). Finally, the threshold of each differential peak was used in PFS analysis to evaluate the prognostic and diagnostic ability of anti-PD-1 therapy.

[0136] FIG. 7 shows the results of the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, which verified the predictability of the differential peak selected as the predictive peak for prognostic diagnosis between the responder and the non-responder groups through the above process.

[0137] FIG. 7A shows the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for nine representative differential peaks (M1, M2, M5, M17, M20, M29, M30, M35, and M36) selected as predictive peaks in the discovery cohort. FIG. 7B shows the sensitivity and specificity of the predictive peak and the threshold value determined through the Cutoff Finder online tool for the nine predictive peaks. Predictive peaks (target ID) were sorted in descending order with respect to the relative mean difference of normalized area values between responder groups (CR+PR) and non-responder groups (PD). Sensitivity and specificity were determined with samples larger or smaller than the threshold for normalized area values for patients who responded and did not respond to anti-PD-1 therapy, respectively.

[0138] The nine representative differential peaks showed statistically fair diagnostic ability with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values 0.7 and specificity and sensitivity of 88.0±3.6% and 70.0±3.9% (means±SEM), respectively. It was thus verified that it has a statistically significant ability to determine the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy prognosis.

[0139] The additional results of predicting the anti-PD-1 therapy results with the predictive peaks discovered in the discovery cohort are shown in FIG. 8. The left plot of FIG. 8 shows the normalized area value results for four representative predictive peaks (M5, M17, M29, M35) in the anti-PD-1 therapy responder group (R, CR+PR) and non-responder group (NR, PD+SD) with normalized area values. The horizontal bar represents the mean value of peak area of each group. Middle plots are waterfall plots of normalized area values for an anti-PD-1 therapy responder group (CR+PR) and a progressive disease group (PD) minus threshold in descending order on the horizontal axis. Right plots show clinical outcomes of anti-PD-1 therapy determined using a threshold on a progression-free survival curve.

[0140] As confirmed on the left portion of FIG. 8, normalized area values (i.e., chromatin openness) by ATAC-seq analysis were clearly differentiated into anti-PD-1 therapy responder groups (R) and non-responder groups (NR) in the discovery cohort. Previous other studies have reported that microsatellite instability (MSI) and Epstein-Ban virus (EBV) positivity in tumor specimens can significantly predict responder group to anti-PD-1 therapy. However, according to the present invention, patients belonging to the non-responder group were distinguished despite the tumor MSI and EBV positive. That is, in the discovery cohort, all EBV-positive patients were classified as responder groups by ATAC-seq, and patients with MSI were also classified as responder groups by ATAC-seq. Despite the fact that the tumor was MSI, a patient (SS #20) who did not respond to anti-PD-1 therapy was correctly classified as a non-responder group by ATAC-seq. These results indicate that the predictive marker selected according to the method of the present invention is used to more accurately predict the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy.

[0141] The right plot shows the progression-free survival curve, where the area value of the peak is greater than the threshold, for example, when the area value of the M17 predictive marker peak exceeds the threshold of 34,190, the progression-free survival period with no tumor growth was significantly longer compared to the groups below that value. In the M17, M29, and M36 predictive marker peaks, a progression-free survival period exceeding a 20-month measurement period was confirmed, and these were denoted as n.r. (not reached).

[0142] As a result, the differential peak selected according to the criteria of the present invention was classified by open chromatin (openness>threshold) and closed chromatin (openness threshold) with high sensitivity and specificity for the patient's responsiveness to anti-PD-1 therapy. Thus, it was confirmed that they could be used as predictive markers. Their sensitivity and specificity are additionally shown in FIG. 9 and Table 6.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Sample Target (n) Sensi- Speci- ID AUROC R* NR** tivity ficity M1  0.745 > 7 8 70.0% 63.6% ≤ 14 M2  0.777 > 8 8 90.0% 63. % ≤ 1 14 M3  0.886 > 9 4 90.0% 81.8% ≤ 1 18 M4  0.718 > 7 7 70.0% 68.2% ≤ 3 16 M5  0.841 > 9 7 90.0% 68.2% ≤ 1 15 M6  0.7 > 7 8 70.0% 77.3% ≤ 3 17 M7  0.845 > 9 7 90.0% 68.2% ≤ 1 15 M8  0.7 9 > 5 4 80.0% 81.8% ≤ 2 17 M9  0.7 1 > 8 13 80.0% 40.9% ≤ 2 9 M10 0.718 > 9 10 90.0% 54.5% ≤ 1 12 M11 0.786 > 8 11 90.0% 5 % ≤ 1 11 M12 0.70 > 9 12 45.5% ≤ 1 10 M13 0.809 > 5 5 80.0% 77.3% ≤ 2 17 M14 0.750 > 9 8 90.0% 83.8% ≤ 1 1 M15 0.723 > 7 70.0% 9.1% ≤ 3 13 M16 0.750 > 9 8 90.0% 63.6% ≤ 1 14 M17 0.90 > 9 4 80.0% 61. % ≤ 1 18 M18 0.814 > 9 8 88.2% ≤ 1 14 M19 0. 34 > 10 7 100.0%  72.7% ≤ 0 15 M20 0.7 > 9 90.0% 72.7% ≤ 1 16 M21 0.818 > 9 6 90.0% 59. % ≤ 1 19 M22 0.727 > 8 9 80.0% 59.1% ≤ 2 13 M23 0.832 > 5 5 77.3% ≤ 2 17 M24 0.736 > 7 7 70.0% 88.2% ≤ 3 15 M25 0.741 > 8 8 80.0% 63.5% ≤ 2 14 M26 0.785 > 9 8 90.0% 59.1% ≤ 1 13 M27 0.818 > 7 9 70.0% 77.3% ≤ 3 17 M28 0.823 > 9 6 90.0% 63.5% ≤ 1 14 M29 0.777 > 10 9 100.0%  ≤ 0 13 M30 0.766 > 7 5 70.0% 77. % ≤ 3 17 M31 0.73 > 8 8 80.0% 63.6% ≤ 2 14 M32 0.791 > 9 9 90.0% 59.1% ≤ 1 13 M33 0.81 > 9 59.1% ≤ 1 13 M34 0.7 4 > 9 8 90.0% 63.8% ≤ 1 14 M35 0.873 > 10 11 100.0%  50.0% ≤ 0 11 M36 0.68 > 4 90.0% 81.6% ≤ 1 18 M37 0.750 > 8 80.0% 77.3% ≤ 2 17 M38 0.805 > 7 6 70.0% 72.7% ≤ 3 16 M39 0.795 > 90.0% 852% ≤ 1 15 M40 0.823 > 9 5 77.3% ≤ 1 17 M41 0.745 > 6 8 80.0% 63.6% ≤ 2 14 M42 0.754 > 7 5 70.0% 77.3% ≤ 3 17 M43 0.736 > 7 6 70.0% 72.7% ≤ 9 18 M44 0.727 > 7 4 70.0% 81.6% ≤ 3 15 M45 0.70 > 7 6 70.0% 72.7% ≤ 3 16 M46 0.682 > 7 70.0% 98.2% ≤ 3 13 M47 0.806 > 9 7 80.0% 88.4% ≤ 1 15 M48 0.814 > 7 3 70.0% 83.6% ≤ 3 19 M49 0.68 > 6 8 80.0% 59.1% ≤ 2 14 M50 0.791 > 9 9 6 % ≤ 1 13 M51 0.786 > 9 7 90.0% ≤ 1 15 M52 0.788 > 8 9 90.0% ≤ 1 13 M53 0.758 > 9 9 59.1% ≤ 1 13 M54 0.700 > 7 6 70.0% 72.7% ≤ 3 M55 0.759 > 8 7 80.0% 68.2% ≤ 2 M56 0.514 > 9 7 68.2% ≤ 1 15 M57 0.877 > 9 4 90.0% 81.8% ≤ 1 15 M58 0.764 > 7 5 70.0% 77.3% ≤ 3 17 M59 0.784 > 7 4 70.0% 81. % ≤ 3 18 M60 0.822 > 8 4 81. % ≤ 2 18 M61 0.7 8 > 8 7 80.0% 69.2% ≤ 2 15 M62 0. 7 > 7 90.0% 68.2% ≤ 1 15 M63 0.773 > 9 53.8% ≤ 1 14 M64 0.600 > 6 90.0% 72.7% ≤ 1 M65 0.859 > 8 3 68.4% ≤ 2 1 M66 0.777 > 7 5 70.0% 77.3% ≤ 3 17 M67 0.764 > 8 8 80.0% 72.7% ≤ 2 16 *R, responder = CR + PR **NR, non-responder = PD + SD indicates data missing or illegible when filed

[0143] As shown in FIG. 9, the mean±SEM of sensitivity and specificity were 82.8±1.1% and 68.6±1.2%, respectively (n=67).

[0144] Confirmation of Responsiveness Predictions by Weighting and Combining Predictive Peaks

[0145] In order to predict the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy by combining nine predictive peaks selected as representative predictive peaks among several differential peaks, they were sorted as shown in Table 7 below according to the descending order of the accuracy (ACC) values of each predictive peak. The results determined by each predictive peak (i.e., open and closed) were weighted according to the order of accuracy, and the degree of chromatin openness was converted into a “weighted score.”

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Target ID ACC** M36 84.4% M17 84.4% M20 78.1% M30 75.0% M5 75.0% M29 71.9% M2 71.9% M1 65.6% M35 65.6% **ACC: Accuracy = (TP + TH)/(TP + FP + TN + FN) TP = True positive; FP = False positive TH = True negative; FN = False negative

[0146] Accordingly, 1 was assigned to the predictive peak M35 having the lowest accuracy among the predictive peaks shown in Table 7, and weights up to 9 were assigned to the predictive peak M36 having the highest accuracy. That is, according to the accuracy, weights, which are integers from 1 to 9, were assigned to chromatin openness samples by each predictive peak. Each combination of predictive peaks was performed by adding the next highest predictive peak one by one from M36 with high accuracy. Responsiveness to anti-PD-1 therapy was predicted by the combination of predictive peaks to which a weighted score was assigned, and the results are shown in Table 8 and FIG. 10.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Thres- Sample (n) Sensi- Speci- Combination of Target (ID) AUROC hold R* NR** tivity ficity M36 + M17 0.927 8.5 > 9 4  90.0% 81.8% ≤ 1 18 M36 + M17 + M20 0.932 15.5 > 9 3  90.0% 86.4% ≤ 1 19 M26 + M17 + M20 + M30 0.923 15.5 > 10 3 100.0% 86.4% ≤ 0 19 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 0.941 20.5 > 10 3 100.0% 86.4% ≤ 0 19 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 0.948 24.5 > 10 3 100.0% 86.4% ≤ 0 19 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 + M2 0.964 27.5 > 10 2 100.0% 90.9% ≤ 0 20 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 + M2 + M1 0.973 27.5 > 10 2 100.0% 90.9% ≤ 0 20 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 + M2 + M1 + 0.973 28.5 > 10 2 100.0% 90.9% M35 ≤ 0 20 *R, responder = CR + PR **NR, non-responder = PD + SD

[0147] As shown in Table 8 and FIG. 10, it was confirmed that compared to the predictive effect on the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy using a single predictive peak, the weighted combination by combining multiple predictive peaks showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) value exceeded 0.923 and that the ability to predict the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy can be further improved by dividing the open chromatin (>threshold) and closed chromatin (≤threshold) groups corresponding to the clinical results. In particular, the combination consisting of 4 predictive peaks (M36+M17+M20+M30) showed high sensitivity and specificity for the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy determination of 100% and 86.4%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival period (mPFS, 2.7 months versus not reached, p<0.001) was also significantly improved. In addition, the combination of only four predictive peaks achieved the optimal saturation point for sensitivity and specificity. This suggests that the combination of the selected predictive peaks is very effective in predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy.

Example 5. Independent Validation in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer (mGC)

[0148] The predictive effect of the selected predictive peak on responsiveness was verified using an independent validation cohort of 52 patients with stage IV mGC who received anti-PD-1 therapy. The patient characteristics of the validation cohort used are summarized in Table 2. All threshold determinations and statistical evaluations used in the previously identified discovery cohort were applied to this new cohort study. As a result of applying nine selected predictive peaks to the validation cohort, responding and non-responding patients were distinguished with high sensitivity and specificity even in a single predictive peak, the same as in the discovery cohort, and the predictive effect on the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy was further improved in the combination of weighted predictive peaks. The predictive effect according to the predicted peak combination is shown in Table 9 and FIGS. 11 and 12.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Thres- Sample (n) Sensi- Speci- Combination of Target (ID) AUROC hold R* NR** tivity ficity M36 + M17 0.626 8.5 > 14 17 77.8% 50.0% ≤ 4 17 M36 + M17 + M20 0.688 15.5 > 14 13 77.8% 61.8% ≤ 4 21 M26 + M17 + M20 + M30 0.730 15.5 > 18 18 100.0%  47.1% ≤ 0 16 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 0.720 20.5 > 18 17 100.0%  50.0% ≤ 0 17 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 0.700 24.5 > 17 16 94.4% 52.9% ≤ 1 18 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 + M2 0.706 27.5 > 16 14 88.9% 58.8% ≤ 2 20 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 + M2 + M1 0.718 27.5 > 16 14 88.9% 58.8% ≤ 2 20 M36 + M17 + M20 + M30 + M5 + M29 + M2 + M1 + 0.717 28.5 > 16 14 88.9% 58.8% M35 ≤ 2 20 *R, responder = CR + PR **NR, non-responder = PD + SD

[0149] As shown in FIG. 11, the single predictive peak showed a sensitivity of up to 94.4% and a specificity of up to 67.6%, so responsiveness could be predicted even with a single marker. In addition, as a result of combining them and applying the weighting method thereto, as shown in Table 9 and FIG. 12, nine predictive peaks selected from the discovery cohort and the corresponding normalization factor (F) were applied to the mGC patient samples in the validation cohort. Thus, it was confirmed that the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy could be predicted equally in the validation cohort. In addition, it was confirmed that regardless of whether the tumors of the validation cohort patients were MSI or EBV-positive, the thresholds of all predictive markers were clearly divided into open chromatin (>threshold) and closed chromatin threshold) groups, which correspond to the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy determinations. The median progression-free survival period was significantly improved in patients (i.e., chromatin openness) whose area values normalized by each predictive peak exceeded the threshold. The possibility that the nine predictive peaks selected through this process could be used as biomarkers (predictive markers) predicting the responsiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer was confirmed in both the discovery and validation cohorts.

Example 6. Confirmation of Normalization Control Peaks in Cells Other than CD8.SUP.+ T Cells

[0150] In order to determine the usefulness of the normalization control peak derived from the present invention in cells other than CD8.sup.+ T cells, normalization control peaks for eight hematopoietic cells, three acute myeloid leukemia cells (genome spatial event database, GSE74912), normal bronchial epithelial cells, small cell lung cancer cells, normal prostate basal epithelial cells, small cell prostate cancer cells (GSE118204), and EGFR negative and positive glioblastoma (GSE117685) were confirmed in the same manner as an Example 2 above. The results are shown in FIGS. 13 to 15.

[0151] Twenty normalization control peaks were confirmed using the genome browser. The ATAC-seq data before analysis which searched for NCBI GEO depository site was converted to Bigwig files using Homer Suite. Normalization control peaks of eight hematopoietic cells are confirmed in FIG. 13. Normalization control peaks of three acute myeloid leukemia cells are confirmed in FIG. 14. Normalization control peaks of normal bronchial epithelial cells, small cell lung cancer cells, normal prostate basal epithelial cells, small cell prostate cancer cells, and EGFR negative and positive glioblastoma are confirmed in FIG. 15. These results suggest that the peaks to be compared are quantitatively analyzed using a normalization process that converts a differential peak into a normalized area value using the normalization control peak of the present invention in cells other than CD8.sup.+ T cells, thereby being used as various biomarkers and performing predictions and diagnostics.