POLYMER COMPOSITION SUITABLE FOR MAKING BLOWN FILMS

Abstract

The present invention relates to a polymer composition comprising at least the following components: A) 70.0 to 95.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of a C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; whereby said C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer has a melting point in the range of 110 to 140° C. determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3; a MFR.sub.2 (230° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.5 to 4.0 g/10 min; and a total C2-content in the range of 1 to 10 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; B) 5.0 to 30.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of a LDPE; whereby said LDPE has a density determined according to ISO 1183 in the range of 915 to 922 kg/m.sup.3; and a MFR2 (190° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.9 to 20.0 g/10 min; with the proviso that the weight proportions of components A) and B) add up to 100 wt.-%. In addition, the present invention refers to the articles, preferably blown films made of said polymer composition

Claims

1. A polymer composition comprising at least the following components: A) 70.0 to 95.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of a C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; whereby said C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer has a melting point in the range of 110 to 140° C. determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3; a MFR.sub.2 (230° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.5 to 4.0 g/10 min; and a total C2-content in the range of 1 to 10 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; B) 5.0 to 30.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of a LDPE; whereby said LDPE has a density determined according to ISO 1183 in the range of 915 to 922 kg/m.sup.3; and a MFR.sub.2 (190° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.9 to 20.0 g/10 min; with the proviso that the weight proportions of components A) and B) add up to 100 wt.-%.

2. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that component A) is consisting of a1) 50.0 to 85.0 wt.-% of a polymer fraction having i) a C2-content in the range of 2.0 to less than 5.5 wt.-%, preferably in the range of 2.0 to 5.49 wt.-%; and ii) a melt flow rate MFR.sub.2 (230° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.5 to 5.0 g/10 min; and a2) 15.0 to 50.0 wt.-% of a polymer fraction having i) a C2-content in the range of 5.5 to 10.0 wt.-%; and ii) a melt flow rate MFR.sub.2 (230° C./2.16 kg) measured according to ISO 1133 in the range of from 0.1 to 3.0 g/10 min; whereby the melt flow rate MFR.sub.2 (230° C./2.16 kg) of polymer fraction a2) is lower than the MFR.sub.2 (230° C./2.16 kg) of polymer fraction a1).

3. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that component A) has a xylene soluble content (XCS) determined according to ISO 16152, led, 25° C., based on the overall weight of component A) in the range of 0.5 to 15.0 wt.-%, a content of units originating from comonomers different from ethylene and propylene of below 7 wt.-%, based on the overall weight of component A), a glass transition temperature in the range of −20 to 0° C. determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-2; or a combination thereof.

4. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that component A) is obtainable in the presence of a metallocene catalyst.

5. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that component B) has a MFR.sub.2 (190° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 2.0 to 15.0 g/10 min; a density determined according to ISO 1183 in the range of 916 to 922 kg/m.sup.3; a content of hexane solubles determined on a 100 μm thick cast film according to FDA 177.1520 in the range of 0 to 10.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of component B); a melting point determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3 in the range of 90 to 120° C.; or a combination thereof.

6. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the polymer composition comprises at least one additive C) present in an amount of 0.1 to 5.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition.

7. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that: the content of component A) in the polymer composition is in the range of 75 to 94 wt.-%, based on the overall weight of the polymer composition; and/or the content of component B) in the polymer composition is in the range of 6 to 25 wt.-%, based on the overall weight of the polymer composition.

8. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the polymer composition comprises: A) 65.0 to 94.9 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of a C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; whereby said C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer has a melting point in the range of 110 to 140° C. determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3; a MFR.sub.2 (230° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.5 to 4.0 g/10 min; and a total C2-content in the range of 1 to 10 wt. % based on the overall weight of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; B) 5.0 to 30.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of a LDPE; whereby said LDPE has a density determined according to ISO 1183 in the range of 915 to 922 kg/m.sup.3; and a MFR.sub.2 (190° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.9 to 20.0 g/10 min; C) 0.1 to 5.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of additives selected from the group consisting of slip agents, acid scavengers, UV-stabilisers, pigments, antioxidants, additive carriers, nucleating agents and mixtures thereof; with the proviso that the weight proportions of components A), B) and C) add up to 100 wt.-%.

9. An article comprising the polymer composition according to claim 1.

10. The article according to claim 9, wherein the article is a blown film.

11. The blown film according to claim 10, characterized in that, the sealing initiation temperature of a blown film having a thickness of 50 μm is in the range of 80° C. to below 120° C.; the crystallization temperature (T.sub.c) of a blown film having a thickness of 50 μm determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3 is in the range of 80 to 95° C.; the blown film has two melting points wherein the first melting point determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3 is in the range of 110 to 130° C., and the second melting point determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3 is in the range from 100 to 115° C.; or a combination thereof.

12. The blown film according to claim 10, characterized in that: the blown film has a tensile modulus determined according to ISO 527-3 at 23° C. on a blown film with a thickness of 50 μm in machine direction as well as in transverse direction in the range of 200 to 1000 MPa; the blown film has a dart-drop impact strength determined according to ASTM D1709, method A on a blown film with a thickness of 50 μm in the range of 20 to 2000 g; the blown film has an Elmendorf tear strength determined in accordance with ISO 6383/2 measured in machine direction in the range of 1.0 N/mm to 50.0 N/mm; the blown film has an Elmendorf tear strength determined in accordance with ISO 6383/2 measured in transverse direction (TD) in the range of 5.0 N/mm to 100.0 N/mm; or a combination thereof.

13. The blown film according to claim 10, characterized in that the blown film has a haze determined according to ASTM D1003-00 on a blown film with a thickness of 50 μm below 4.2%.

14. A flexible packaging system comprising a blown film according to claim 10, wherein the flexible packaging system comprises bags or pouches for food and/or pharmaceutical packaging.

15. The polymer composition according to claim 1, characterized in that, component A) has a melting point in the range of 115 to 138° C., determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3; a total C2-content in the range of 1.5 to 8.0 wt.-%, based on the overall weight of component A); and/or a melt flow rate MFR.sub.2 (230° C./2.16 kg) measured according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0.7 to 3.5 g/10 min; or a combination thereof.

16. The polymer composition according to claim 4, wherein said metallocene catalyst comprises: i) a complex of formula (I): ##STR00003## wherein M is zirconium or hafnium; each X is a sigma ligand; L is a divalent bridge selected from —R′.sub.2C—, —R′.sub.2C—CR′.sub.2—, —R′.sub.2Si—, —R′.sub.2Si—SiR′.sub.2—, —R′.sub.2Ge—, wherein each R′ is independently a hydrogen atom, C.sub.1-C.sub.20-hydrocarbyl, tri(C.sub.1-C.sub.20-alkyl)silyl, C.sub.6-C.sub.20-aryl, C.sub.7-C.sub.20-arylalkyl or C.sub.7-C.sub.20-alkylaryl; R.sup.2 and R.sup.2′ are each independently a C.sub.1-C.sub.20-hydrocarbyl radical optionally containing one or more heteroatoms from groups 14 to 16; R.sup.5′ is a C.sub.1-20-hydrocarbyl group containing one or more heteroatoms from groups 14 to 16 optionally substituted by one or more halo atoms; R.sup.6 and R.sup.6′ are each independently hydrogen or a C.sub.1-20-hydrocarbyl group optionally containing one or more heteroatoms from groups 14-16; R.sup.7 is hydrogen or C.sub.1-20-hydrocarbyl group optionally containing one or more heteroatoms from groups 14-16; R.sup.7′ is hydrogen; Ar and Ar′ each are independently an aryl or heteroaryl group having up to 20 carbon atoms optionally substituted by one or more groups R.sup.1; each R.sup.1 is a C.sub.1-20-hydrocarbyl group or two R.sup.1 groups on adjacent carbon atoms taken together can form a fused 5 or 6 membered non aromatic ring with the Ar or Ar′ group, said ring being itself optionally substituted with one or more groups R.sup.4; each R.sup.4 is a C.sub.1-20-hydrocarbyl group; and (ii) a cocatalyst comprising at least one or two compounds of a group 13 metal.

17. The polymer composition according to claim 6, wherein additive C) is selected from the group consisting of slip agents, acid scavengers, UV-stabilisers, pigments, antioxidants, additive carriers, nucleating agents and mixtures thereof.

18. The polymer composition according to claim 8, characterized in that the polymer composition comprises: A) 84.0 to 92.75 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; B) 7 to 15 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of the LDPE; C) preferably 0.25 to 1.0 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the polymer composition of additives; with the proviso that the weight proportions of components A), B) and C) add up to 100 wt.-%.

19. The polymer composition according to claim 8, characterized in that: said C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer has a melting point in the range of 128 to 135° C. determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to ISO 11357-3; a MFR.sub.2 (230° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 g/10 min; and a total C2-content in the range of 2.5 to 5.5 wt.-% based on the overall weight of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer; and/or said LDPE has a density determined according to ISO 1183 in the range of 917 to 921 kg/m.sup.3; and a MFR.sub.2 (190° C., 2.16 kg) determined according to ISO 1133 in the range of 0

6. 5 to 10.0 g/10 min.

Description

EXPERIMENTAL PART

A. Measuring Methods

[0090] The following definitions of terms and determination methods apply for the above general description of the invention as well as to the below examples unless otherwise defined.

Melt Flow Rate

[0091] The melt flow rate (MFR) was determined according to ISO 1133—Determination of the melt mass-flow rate (M FR) and melt volume-flow rate (MVR) of thermoplastics—Part 1: Standard method and is indicated in g/10 min. The MFR is an indication of the flowability, and hence the processability, of the polymer. The higher the melt flow rate, the lower the viscosity of the polymer. The MFR.sub.2 of polyethylene is determined at a temperature of 190° C. and a load of 2.16 kg. The MFR.sub.2 of polypropylene is determined at a temperature of 230° C. and a load of 2.16 kg.

Determination of the C2- and C3-Content in Component A) by NMR

[0092] Quantitative nuclear-magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was further used to quantify the comonomer content and comonomer sequence distribution of the polymers. Quantitative .sup.13C{H} NMR spectra were recorded in the solution-state using a Bruker Advance III 400 NMR spectrometer operating at 400.15 and 100.62 MHz for.sup.1H and .sup.13C respectively. All spectra were recorded using a .sup.13C optimised 10 mm extended temperature probehead at 125° C. using nitrogen gas for all pneumatics. Approximately 200 mg of material was dissolved in 3 ml of 1,2-tetrachloroethane-d.sub.2 (TCE-d.sub.2) along with chromium-(III)-acetylacetonate (Cr(acac).sub.3) resulting in a 65 mM solution of relaxation agent in solvent (Singh, G., Kothari, A., Gupta, V., Polymer Testing 28 5 (2009), 475). To ensure a homogenous solution, after initial sample preparation in a heat block, the NMR tube was further heated in a rotatary oven for at least 1 hour. Upon insertion into the magnet the tube was spun at 10 Hz. This setup was chosen primarily for the high resolution and quantitatively needed for accurate ethylene content quantification. Standard single-pulse excitation was employed without NOE, using an optimised tip angle, 1 s recycle delay and a bi-level WALTZ16 decoupling scheme (Zhou, Z., Kuemmerle, R., Qiu, X., Redwine, D., Cong, R., Taha, A., Baugh, D. Winniford, B., J. Mag. Reson. 187 (2007) 225; Busico, V., Carbonniere, P., Cipullo, R., Pellecchia, R., Severn, J., Talarico, G., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1128). A total of 6144 (6 k) transients were acquired per spectra. Quantitative .sup.13C{.sup.1H} NMR spectra were processed, integrated and relevant quantitative properties determined from the integrals using proprietary computer programs. All chemical shifts were indirectly referenced to the central methylene group of the ethylene block (EEE) at 30.00 ppm using the chemical shift of the solvent. This approach allowed comparable referencing even when this structural unit was not present. Characteristic signals corresponding to the incorporation of ethylene were observed Cheng, H. N., Macromolecules 17 (1984), 1950).

[0093] With characteristic signals corresponding to 2,1 erythro regio defects observed (as described in L. Resconi, L. Cavallo, A. Fait, F. Piemontesi, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100 (4), 1253, in Cheng, H. N., Macromolecules 1984, 17, 1950, and in W-J. Wang and S. Zhu, Macromolecules 2000, 33 1157) the correction for the influence of the regio defects on determined properties was required. Characteristic signals corresponding to other types of regio defects were not observed.

[0094] The comonomer fraction was quantified using the method of Wang et. al. (Wang, W-J., Zhu, S., Macromolecules 33 (2000), 1157) through integration of multiple signals across the whole spectral region in the .sup.13C{.sup.1H} spectra. This method was chosen for its robust nature and ability to account for the presence of regio-defects when needed. Integral regions were slightly adjusted to increase applicability across the whole range of encountered comonomer contents.

[0095] For systems where only isolated ethylene in PPEPP sequences was observed the method of Wang et. al. was modified to reduce the influence of non-zero integrals of sites that are known to not be present. This approach reduced the overestimation of ethylene content for such systems and was achieved by reduction of the number of sites used to determine the absolute ethylene content to:

E=0.5(Sββ+Sβγ+Sβδ+0.5(Sαβ+Sαγ))

[0096] Through the use of this set of sites the corresponding integral equation becomes:

E=0.5(I.sub.H+I.sub.G+0.5(I.sub.C+I.sub.D))

using the same notation used in the article of Wang et. al. (Wang, W-J., Zhu, S., Macromolecules 33 (2000), 1157). Equations used for absolute propylene content were not modified.

[0097] The mole percent comonomer incorporation was calculated from the mole fraction:

E[mol-%]=100*f

[0098] The weight percent comonomer incorporation was calculated from the mole fraction:

E[wt.-%]=100*(fE*28.06)/((fE*28.06)+((1−fE)*42.08))

[0099] The comonomer sequence distribution at the triad level was determined using the analysis method of Kakugo et al. (Kakugo, M., Naito, Y., Mizunuma, K., Miyatake, T. Macromolecules 15 (1982) 1150). This method was chosen for its robust nature and integration regions slightly adjusted to increase applicability to a wider range of comonomer contents.

Xylene Cold Solubles (XCS)

[0100] The xylene soluble (XS) fraction as defined and described in the present invention is determined in line with ISO 16152 as follows: 2.0 g of the polymer were dissolved in 250 ml p-xylene at 135° C. under agitation. After 30 minutes, the solution was allowed to cool for 15 minutes at ambient temperature and then allowed to settle for 30 minutes at 25+/−0.5° C. The solution was filtered with filter paper into two 100 ml flasks. The solution from the first 100 ml vessel was evaporated in nitrogen flow and the residue dried under vacuum at 90° C. until constant weight is reached. The xylene soluble fraction (percent) can then be determined as follows:

XS %=(100*m*V.sub.0)/(m.sub.0*v); m.sub.0=initial polymer amount (g); m=weight of residue (g); V.sub.0=initial volume (ml); v=volume of analysed sample (ml).

Melting Temperature T.sub.m, Crystallization Temperature T.sub.c and Melting Enthalpy H.sub.m

[0101] The melting temperature was determined with a TA Instrument Q2000 differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on 5 to 7 mg samples. DSC is run according to ISO 11357/part 3/method C2 in a heat/cool/heat cycle with a scan rate of 10° C./min in the temperature range of −30 to +225° C. Crystallization temperature (T.sub.c) is determined from the cooling step, while melting temperature (T.sub.m) and melting enthalpy (H.sub.m) are determined from the second heating step. For calculating the melting enthalpy 50° C. is used as lower integration limit. Melting and crystallization temperatures were taken as the peaks of endotherms and exotherms.

Glass Transition Temperature T.SUB.g

[0102] The glass transition temperature Tg was measured by DSC according to ISO 11357/part 2.

Density

[0103] Density of the materials was measured according to ISO 1183-1.

[0104] All film properties (except hexane solubles) were determined on monolayer blown films of 50 μm thickness produced on a Collin blown film line. This line has a screw diameter of 30 millimeters (mm), L/D of 30, a die diameter of 60 mm, a die gap of 1.5 mm and a duo-lip cooling ring. The film samples were produced at 210° C. with an average thickness of 50 μm, with a 2.5 blow-up ratio and an output rate of about 8 kilograms per hour (kg/h).

Content of Hexane Solubles in Component A)

[0105] 1 g of a polymer cast film of 100 μm thickness (chill roll temperature during film production=40° C.) was added to 400 ml hexane at 50° C. for 2 hours while stirring with a reflux cooler. After 2 hours the mixture is immediately filtered on a filter paper No 41. The precipitate is collected in an aluminium recipient and the residual hexane is evaporated on a steam bath under N2 flow. The amount of hexane solubles is determined by the formula

((wt. sample+wt. crucible)−(wt crucible))/(wt. sample).Math.100.

Sealing Initiation Temperature (SIT); (Sealing end Temperature (SET), Sealing Range)

[0106] The sealing temperature range is the temperature range, in which the films can be sealed according to conditions given below. The lower limit (heat sealing initiation temperature (SIT)) is the sealing temperature at which a sealing strength of >5 N is achieved. The upper limit (sealing end temperature (SET)) is reached, when the films stick to the sealing device.

[0107] The sealing range was determined on a J&B Universal Sealing Machine Type 3000 with a film of 50 μm thickness with the following further parameters:

[0108] Specimen width: 25.4 mm

[0109] Seal Pressure: 0.1 N/mm.sup.2

[0110] Seal Time: 0.1 s

[0111] Cool time: 99 s

[0112] Peel Speed: 10 mm/s

[0113] Start temperature: 80° C.

[0114] End temperature: 150° C.

[0115] Increments: 10° C.

[0116] The specimen is sealed inside to inside at each sealbar temperature and seal strength (force) is determined at each step. The temperature is determined at which the seal strength reaches 5 N.

Tensile Modulus

[0117] Tensile Modulus in machine and transverse direction are determined according to ISO 527-3 at 23° C. on blown films of 50 μm thickness produced on a monolayer cast film line with a melt temperature of 220° C. and a chill roll temperature of 20° C. with a thickness of 50 μm produced as indicated below. Testing was performed at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min.

Dart-Drop Impact Strength (DDI)

[0118] DDI was measured using ASTM D1709, method A (Alternative Testing Technique) from the film samples. A dart with a 38 mm diameter hemispherical head was dropped from a height of 0.66 m onto a film clamped over a hole. Successive sets of twenty specimens are tested. One weight was used for each set and the weight is increased (or decreased) from set to set by uniform increments. The weight resulting in failure of 50% of the specimens is calculated and reported.

Tear Strength

[0119] Tear Strength (determined as Elmendorf tear (N)): Applies both for the measurement in machine direction (MD) and transverse direction (TD). The tear strength was measured using the ISO 6383/2 method. The force required to propagate tearing across a film sample was measured using a pendulum device. The pendulum swings under gravity through an arc, tearing the specimen from pre-cut slit. The film sample was fixed on one side by the pendulum and on the other side by a stationary clamp. The tear resistance is the force required to tear the specimen. The relative tear resistance (N/mm) was then calculated by dividing the tear resistance by the thickness of the film.

Haze

[0120] The haze was determined according to ASTM D1003-00 on films blown as described below with a thickness of 50 μm.

B. Materials Used

[0121] C.sub.2C.sub.3 Random Copolymer (Component A))

[0122] In the Working Example according to the invention IE1 and in the Comparative Examples CE1 and CE2 a C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer A) manufactured as follows was used.

[0123] The catalyst used in the polymerization processes for the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer A) was prepared as follows:

[0124] The metallocene (MC1) (rac-anti-dimethylsilandiyl(2-methyl-4-phenyl-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indenyl)(2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)indenyl)zirconium dichloride)

##STR00002##

has been synthesized according to the procedure as described in WO 2013/007650 A1, E2.

Preparation of MAO-Silica Support

[0125] A steel reactor equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a filter net was flushed with nitrogen and the reactor temperature was set to 20° C. Next silica grade DM-L-303 from AGC Si-Tech Co, pre-calcined at 600° C. (7.4 kg) was added from a feeding drum followed by careful pressuring and depressurising with nitrogen using manual valves. Then toluene (32 kg) was added. The mixture was stirred for 15 min. Next 30 wt.-% solution of MAO in toluene (17.5 kg) from Lanxess was added via feed line on the top of the reactor within 70 min. The reaction mixture was then heated up to 90° C. and stirred at 90° C. for additional two hours. The slurry was allowed to settle and the mother liquor was filtered off. The MAO treated support was washed twice with toluene (32 kg) at 90° C., following by settling and filtration. The reactor was cooled off to 60° C. and the solid was washed with heptane (32.2 kg). Finally MAO treated SiO2 was dried at 60° under nitrogen flow for 2 hours and then for 5 hours under vacuum (−0.5 barg) with stirring. MAO treated support was collected as a free-flowing white powder found to contain 12.6% Al by weight.

Catalyst System Preparation

[0126] 30 wt.-% MAO in toluene (2.2 kg) was added into a steel nitrogen blanked reactor via a burette at 20° C. Toluene (7 kg) was then added under stirring. Metallocene MC1 (286 g) was added from a metal cylinder followed by flushing with 1 kg toluene. The mixture was stirred for 60 minutes at 20° C. Trityl tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate (336 g) was then added from a metal cylinder followed by a flush with 1 kg of toluene. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The resulting solution was added to a stirred cake of MAO-silica support prepared as described above over 1 hour. The cake was allowed to stay for 12 hours, followed by drying under N.sub.2 flow at 60° C. for 2 h and additionally for 5 h under vacuum (−0.5 barg) under stirring. Dried catalyst was sampled in the form of pink free flowing powder containing 13.9 wt.-% Al and 0.26 wt.-% Zr.

[0127] The polymerization for preparing the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer (A) was performed in a Borstar pilot plant with a 2-reactor set-up (loop—gas phase reactor (GPR 1)). In Table 1 the polymerization conditions for the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer (A) are given.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Preparation of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer (A). a Prepoly reactor Temperature [° C.] 25 Pressure [Pa] 5190 Catalyst feed [kg/h] 1.8 H2 [g/h] 0.3 Feed H2/C3 ratio [mol/kmol] 0.09 Residence time [h] 0.4 loop reactor Temperature [° C.] 68 Pressure [Pa] 5387 Feed H2/C3 ratio [mol/kmol] 0.30 Feed C2/C3 ratio [mol/kmol] 48.26 Polymer Split [wt.-%] 65 MFR.sub.2 [g/10 min] (MFR of a1)) 1.4 Total C2 loop [wt.-%] (C2 of a1)) 5.0 Residence time 0.43 b GPR1 Temperature [° C.] 75 Pressure [Pa] 2500 H2/C3 ratio [mol/kmol] 3.0 C2/C3 ratio [mol/kmol] 217 Polymer residence time (h) 2.1 Polymer Split [wt.-%] 35 Total MFR.sub.2 [g/10 min] 1.2 MFR.sub.2 [g/10 min] in GPR1 (MFR of a2)) 1.1 Total C2 [wt.-%] (loop + GPR1) 4.9 C2 in GPR1 [wt.-%] (C2 of a2)) 4.7 XCS [wt.-%] 3.4 Total productivity (kg PP/g cat) 29

[0128] The polymer powder was compounded in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder Coperion ZSK 57 at 220° C. with 0.1 wt.-% antioxidant (Irgafos 168FF, CAS No. 6683-19-4), 0.1 wt.-% of a sterically hindered phenol (Irganox 1010FF, CAS No. 6683-19-8) and 0.05 wt.-% of Ca-stearate (wt.-% refer to the overall weight of the polymer powder).

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Properties of the C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer copolymer (A). C.sub.2C.sub.3 random Physical property unit copolymer MFR (230° C., 2.16 kg) [g/10 min] 1.2 XCS total [wt.-%] 3.4 C2-content [wt.-%] 4.9 C3-content [wt.-%] 95.1 Melting point, T.sub.m [° C.] 118 Crystallization [° C.] 80 temperature, T.sub.c

Component B)

[0129] CA8200: CA8200 is a low density polyethylene (LDPE) produced in a high pressure autoclave process having a Melt Flow Rate (190° C./2.16 kg) of 7.5 g/10 min, a melting temperature (determined by DSC according to ISO 11357/03) of 108° C., a density of 920 kg/m.sup.3 (determined according to ISO1183) and is commercially available from Borealis AG, Austria.

Further Components

[0130] FT5230: FT5320 is a low density polyethylene commercially available from Borealis AG, Austria. It has a density of 923 kg/m.sup.3 (determined according to ISO1183), a Melt Flow Rate (190° C./2.16 kg) of 0.75 g/10 min and a melting temperature (determined by DSC according to ISO 11357/03) of 112° C.

C. Manufacturing of Blown Films

[0131] Blending of the components was done in a Collin 30 lab scale blown film machine and a 50 μm monolayer blown film is produced with the same line (BUR=1:2.5). Before blending, the components were pre-mixed in an intensive mixer. In Table 3 the compositions of the polymer compositions according to Comparative Examples CE1 and CE2 and the Inventive Examples IE1 and film parameters are shown.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Composition and properties of blown films. Unit CE1 CE2 IE1 Component C.sub.2C.sub.3 random copolymer (A) wt.-% 100 90 90 CA8200 (B) wt.-% — — 10 FT5230 wt.-% — 10 — Properties of a blown film (50 μm thickness) Dart Drop Impact g 56 64 65 Haze % 4.2 12.3 3.1 Tear Strength (MD) N/mm 8.07 7.94 8.22 Tear Strength (TD) N/mm 19.76 19.69 22.77 Sealing initiation temperature ° C. 104 101 103 Crystallization temperature ° C. 82 88 87 Melting temperature 1 ° C. 118 120 119 Melting temperature 2 ° C. — 111 107 Melting enthalpy 1 J/g 62 11 12 Melting enthalpy 2 J/g — 56 57

D. Discussion of the Results

[0132] As can be gathered from Table 3 the addition of the specific LDPE according to the present invention (component (B)) to component (A) allows to improve the optical properties, especially the haze, of a blown film (see comparison of CE1 and IE1) without deteriorating the mechanical properties of the blown film. CE2 demonstrates that the addition of a LDPE outside the scope of the present invention (FT5230) results in a film with poor optical properties, especially a significantly increased haze.