Circular dipole and surface coil loop structures and methods for using the same

Abstract

A circular dipole antenna (e.g., for a magnetic imaging system) according to exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure can comprise a circular conductor with a feed point on one side and a gap on the other. A surface coil loop antenna (e.g., for magnetic imaging system) is provided with a capacitor arrangement selected for non-uniform or unbalanced current distribution, with corresponding magnetic and electric dipole fields provided in a single structure referred to as a loopole.

Claims

1. An antenna arrangement, comprising: at least one surface coil loop conductor and a plurality of capacitors coupled to the at least one surface coil loop conductor, the capacitors being configured to facilitate an unbalanced current flow when the at least one surface coil loop conductor is excited by a radio frequency (RF), wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor and the plurality of capacitors are configured to cause a transmission of an electromagnetic radiation from a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparatus to a body.

2. The antenna arrangement of claim 1, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is configured to generate unbalanced current flow when excited by a radio frequency.

3. The antenna arrangement of claim 1, wherein the arrangement has a substantially planar configuration.

4. The antenna arrangement of claim 1, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is a substantially flat conductor strip formed into a circle.

5. The antenna arrangement of claim 1, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is formed from a substantially linear dipole structure.

6. The antenna arrangement of claim 1, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor includes a plurality of surface coil loop conductors spaced apart from one another.

7. An antenna arrangement, comprising: at least one surface coil loop conductor and a plurality of capacitors coupled to the at least one surface coil loop conductor, the capacitors being configured to facilitate an unbalanced current flow when the at least one surface coil loop conductor is excited by a radio frequency (RF); and at least one transmit coil and at least one receive coil each of which is configured to interact with a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus.

8. The antenna arrangement of claim 7, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is configured to generate unbalanced current flow when excited by a radio frequency.

9. The antenna arrangement of claim 7, wherein the arrangement has a substantially planar configuration.

10. The antenna arrangement of claim 7, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is a substantially flat conductor strip formed into a circle.

11. The antenna arrangement of claim 7, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is formed from a substantially linear dipole structure.

12. The antenna arrangement of claim 7, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor includes a plurality of surface coil loop conductors spaced apart from one another.

13. An antenna arrangement, comprising: at least one surface coil loop conductor and a plurality of capacitors coupled to the at least one surface coil loop conductor, the capacitors being configured to facilitate an unbalanced current flow when the at least one surface coil loop conductor is excited by a radio frequency (RF); wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor includes a plurality of surface coil loop conductors overlapping one another.

14. The antenna arrangement of claim 13, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is configured to generate unbalanced current flow when excited by a radio frequency.

15. The antenna arrangement of claim 13, wherein the arrangement has a substantially planar configuration.

16. The antenna arrangement of claim 13, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is a substantially flat conductor strip formed into a circle.

17. The antenna arrangement of claim 13, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is formed from a substantially linear dipole structure.

18. The antenna arrangement of claim 13, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor includes a plurality of surface coil loop conductors spaced apart from one another.

19. An antenna arrangement, comprising: at least one surface coil loop conductor and a plurality of capacitors coupled to the at least one surface coil loop conductor, the capacitors being configured to facilitate an unbalanced current flow when the at least one surface coil loop conductor is excited by a radio frequency (RF); wherein the capacitors are coupled to the at least one surface coil loop conductor at least one of (i) in a long feed leg, (ii) on an opposite long leg, (iii) in one short leg, or (iv) in two short legs.

20. The antenna arrangement of claim 19, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is configured to generate unbalanced current flow when excited by a radio frequency.

21. The antenna arrangement of claim 19, wherein the arrangement has a substantially planar configuration.

22. The antenna arrangement of claim 19, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is a substantially flat conductor strip formed into a circle.

23. The antenna arrangement of claim 19, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor is formed from a substantially linear dipole structure.

24. The antenna arrangement of claim 19, wherein the at least one surface coil loop conductor includes a plurality of surface coil loop conductors spaced apart from one another.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The foregoing and other objects of the present disclosure will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying exemplary drawings and claims showing illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure, in which:

(2) FIG. 1A is an illustration of an exemplary circular dipole structure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(3) FIG. 1B is an illustration of a linear or straight dipole structure;

(4) FIG. 2A is an exemplary simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for a central axial slice of a circular dipole according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(5) FIG. 2B is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for a central axial slice of a straight dipole;

(6) FIG. 3A is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for a sagittal slice of the exemplary circular dipole according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(7) FIG. 3B is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for a sagittal slice of the straight dipole;

(8) FIG. 4A is an illustration of an exemplary axial map of the amount of circular polarization for the exemplary circular dipole according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(9) FIG. 4B is an illustration of an axial map of the amount of circular polarization for the straight dipole;

(10) FIG. 5A is an illustration of an exemplary sagittal map of the amount of circular polarization for the exemplary circular dipole according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(11) FIG. 5B is an illustration of a sagittal map of the amount of circular polarization for the straight dipole;

(12) FIG. 6 is a graph of B.sub.1.sup.+ field strength as function of phantom depth for circular and straight dipole structures according to an exemplary embodiment of the circular dipole structure, as described in the present disclosure;

(13) FIG. 7A is an exemplary simulated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) map for a central axial slice of an exemplary circular dipole according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(14) FIG. 7B is a simulated SNR ratio map for a central axial slice of the straight dipole;

(15) FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating current distribution on an exemplary circular dipole according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(16) FIG. 9A is an illustration of an exemplary array layout according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(17) FIG. 9B is an illustration of an exemplary array layout showing that the capacitors can be unevenly distributed according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(18) FIG. 10 is a perspective view of an exemplary coil constructed according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, used in a medical imaging apparatus;

(19) FIG. 11A is a simulated map of current density in a phantom for a single-balanced loop;

(20) FIG. 11B is a simulated map of current density in a phantom for an unbalanced loop according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(21) FIG. 12A is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the single-balanced loop;

(22) FIG. 12B is an exemplary simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for an unbalanced loop according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(23) FIG. 12C is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for an electric dipole;

(24) FIG. 12D is an experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the single-balanced loop;

(25) FIG. 12E is an exemplary experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the unbalanced loop according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(26) FIG. 12F is an experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the electric dipole;

(27) FIG. 13A is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the balanced array in a first orientation;

(28) FIG. 13B is an exemplary simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the unbalanced array in the first orientation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(29) FIG. 13C is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the electric dipole in the first orientation;

(30) FIG. 13D is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the balanced array in a second orientation;

(31) FIG. 13E is an exemplary simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the unbalanced array in the second orientation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(32) FIG. 13F is a simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the electric dipole in the second orientation;

(33) FIG. 14A is an SNR map for the balanced array in the first orientation;

(34) FIG. 14B is an exemplary SNR map for the unbalanced array in the first orientation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(35) FIG. 14C is an SNR map for the electric dipole in the first orientation;

(36) FIG. 14D is an SNR map for the balanced array in the second orientation;

(37) FIG. 14E is an exemplary SNR map for the unbalanced array in the second orientation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(38) FIG. 15A is an experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the balanced array in the first orientation;

(39) FIG. 15B is an exemplary experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the unbalanced array in the first orientation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(40) FIG. 15C is an experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for an electric dipole in the first orientation;

(41) FIG. 15D is an experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the balanced array in the second orientation;

(42) FIG. 15E is an exemplary experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ field map for the unbalanced array in the second orientation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(43) FIG. 16 is an experimental bar graph of central SNR values for balanced and unbalanced arrays in the first and second orientations and for the dipole in the first orientation, according to exemplary embodiments of the unbalanced array as described in the present disclosure;

(44) FIG. 17 is an illustration of an exemplary block diagram of an exemplary system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(45) FIG. 18 is an illustration of an exemplary loopole array according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(46) FIG. 19 is an illustration of an exemplary extended z loopole array according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(47) FIG. 20 is an image of the exemplary loopole array according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(48) FIG. 21A is a set of simulated axial B.sub.1.sup.+ maps according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(49) FIG. 21B is a set of experimental B.sub.1.sup.+ maps according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(50) FIG. 22 is a set of sagittal B.sub.1.sup.+ maps according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(51) FIG. 23A is a set of in-vivo SNR maps for the exemplary loopole array according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(52) FIG. 23B is a set of in-vivo SNR maps for the exemplary offset loop array according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(53) FIG. 24A is an image of in-vivo axial turbo spin echo (TSE) images according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and

(54) FIG. 24B is an image of in-vivo coronal TSE images according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

(55) Throughout the drawings, the same reference numerals and characters, unless otherwise stated, are used to denote like features, elements, components or portions of the illustrated embodiments. Moreover, while the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the figures, it is done so in connection with the illustrative embodiments and is not limited by the particular embodiments illustrated in the figures or provided in the appended claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

(56) In MR imaging, B.sub.1.sup.+ and B.sub.1.sup. can be defined as components of the RF magnetic field, which can rotate and anti-rotate in a plane perpendicular to the static magnetic field. With the static field defined along the z axis, for example, B.sub.1.sup.+=B.sub.x+iB.sub.y and B.sub.1.sup.=B.sub.xiB.sub.y. In an efficient system, the ratio |B.sub.1.sup.+|/|B.sub.1.sup.| can exceed one.

(57) Exemplary Circular Dipole

(58) A circular dipole is described herein, and can include a circular conductor with a feed point on one side, and a gap on the other. (See e.g., FIG. 1). This exemplary antenna design can have benefits compared to a straight half-wavelength self-resonant dipole antenna including B.sub.1.sup.+ efficiency, compactness, decoupling of neighboring elements and the potential for capturing magnetic and electric dipole fields in a single element.

(59) Exemplary Methods

(60) Exemplary embodiments of applications of RF antennas as transmit and receive structures for magnetic resonance imaging, and circular dipole and surface coil loop structures can be provided. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a configuration of array element(s) can be provided which can capture magnetic and electric dipole fields in a single antenna structure, and demonstrate improved performance compared to conventional surface coil loops at 7 T.

(61) In various examples and exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, circular loop and loophole antennas can be utilized to improve RF coil performance, for example, in an MRI imaging system configured to encompass both loop and electric dipole behavior in a single antenna element. This can increase the performance of each single antenna element or structure, providing robust mixed loop and dipole performance while reducing (e.g., halving) the number of such elements, as compared to other systems.

(62) In loopole (e.g., loop+dipole) or unbalanced loop exemplary embodiments, an RF antenna for a medical imaging system can be provided as a surface coil loop with capacitors arranged so that current can flow preferentially on one side of the loop, as compared to the other (e.g., opposite) side of the loop. The current imbalance can be adjusted to select or dial in desired amounts or degrees of loop and dipole behavior.

(63) In circular loop exemplary embodiments, an RF antenna for a medical imaging system can be provided in the form of a dipole wrapped around into a circle. Unlike loopole embodiments, in some configurations the circular loop embodiments do not need to have capacitors distributed along their length, and a gap can be provided at the far side of the coil from the feeding point. Alternatively or in addition, capacitors can be provided. Thus, the exemplary circular loop can be used as an extension of the loopole exemplary design.

(64) Full wave electromagnetic simulations were performed with a finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method, for example, utilizing a Microwave Studio, CST, 2012 MA system. The coil was modeled as a flat conductor strip, at about 5 cm wide, forming a circle with inner diameter, 165 of about 16 cm. (See e.g., FIG. 1A). A drive port 110 was placed at gap in the conductor of about 5 mm. With a gap in the far side of the circle, of about 2 cm, the antenna was resonant at a radio frequency, for example, at about 297.2 MHz. This structure was placed above a rectangular block of material, for example, about 2 cm above an about 40 cm25 cm80 cm block of material with .sub.r about equal to 59 and about equal to 0.77.

(65) An S.sub.11 match of about 20 dB was achieved by placing a capacitor (e.g., about 6.8 pF) in parallel with the drive port. A straight dipole antenna (see, e.g., FIG. 1B) was also simulated, for example, at about 40 cm long with a conductor width of about 5 cm on the same phantom. In this example, a match of about 16 dB was achieved by placing a capacitor in parallel with the drive port of about 3.9 pF. The simulated SNR was calculated by using the Kellman method. (See, e.g., Reference 6).

(66) Exemplary Results

(67) Simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ maps for the circular and straight dipole antennas are shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. The circular dipole (see, e.g., FIG. 2A) can create greater excitation near the coil, while still having lower B.sub.1.sup.+ at depth compared to the straight dipole. (See, e.g., FIG. 2B). The peak 10 g averaged SAR was higher for the circular dipole (e.g., about 0.7247 as compared to about 0.4874 for the straight dipole), but when B.sub.1.sup.+ can be normalized by dividing by the square root of peak SAR, the resulting B.sub.1.sup.+ maps still show better performance near the circular dipole (see, e.g., FIG. 3A). As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the exemplary sagittal slice also shows the reduced z-extent of the excitation created by the circular dipole (see, e.g., FIG. 3A) compared to the straight dipole. (See, e.g., FIG. 3B).

(68) An exemplary examination of the B-vector evolution with time in the simulation illustrates that there can be regions near the circular dipole where circular polarization can be produced, whereas the excitation can be almost completely linear for the straight dipole. This exemplary behavior is shown in FIGS. 5A & 5B, which illustrates a degree of correct circular polarization by plotting (|B.sub.1.sup.+|/|B.sub.1|).sup.2. value of 2 can represent a field B1, which can be completely circularly polarized in the correct sense. A value of 1 can represent linear polarization, and a value of 0 can represent anti-quadrature polarization. A substantial amount of circular polarization can be produced by the circular dipole (element 605), as compared to almost none for the straight dipole (element 610). This can be due to the loop-like structure of the circular dipole and the eddy currents induced in the sample. (See, e.g., Reference 7).

(69) FIG. 4A illustrates an axial map of the amount of circular polarization produced by the exemplary circular dipole arrangement. Underneath the drive point, where the B.sub.1.sup.+ field can be strong, there can also be a lot of circular polarization, which can increase the efficiency of the exemplary antenna arrangement. FIG. 4B illustrates an axial map of the amount of circular polarization produced by the straight dipole. Near the antenna where the B.sub.1.sup.+ field can be strong there is only linear polarization, making this antenna less efficient. FIG. 5A illustrates a sagittal map of the amount of circular polarization produced by the exemplary circular dipole arrangement. FIG. 5B illustrates a sagittal map of the amount of circular polarization produced by the straight dipole. Directly under each antenna where the B.sub.1.sup.+ field can be strong the exemplary circular dipole produces more circular polarization than the straight dipole.

(70) The exemplary B.sub.1.sup.+ profiles of the circular and straight dipoles along the phantom depth are shown in FIG. 6. The profiles show that a circular dipole can produce higher B.sub.1.sup.+ at particular depths, for example, between about 5 cm and about 10 cm. At other exemplary depths, for example, between about 10 cm and about 15 cm, the circular dipole and the straight dipole can produce similar B.sub.1.sup.+. In some examples, the straight dipole (see, e.g., FIG. 4B) can be better at other depths, for example, beyond about 15 cm.

(71) Exemplary simulated SNR maps are shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B. For example, at shallow depths, (e.g., about 5-10 cm), the circular dipoles show better SNR performance (see, e.g., FIG. 7A). This can be due to the fact that the circular dipoles can be sensitive to both magnetic and electric dipole fields. At other depths, for example, between about 10 cm and about 15 cm, the exemplary SNR performance can be almost similar, and the straight dipole can start to win out after certain depths (e.g., about 15 cm). (See, e.g., FIG. 7A).

Exemplary Discussion

(72) The exemplary circular polarization created by the circular dipole, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, can indicate that can should be sensitive both to electric and magnetic dipole fields, offering better performance than either a traditional loop or straight dipole alone. This can be supported by considering the current distribution on the circular dipole as shown in FIG. 8, where the current on the circular dipole 805 can be approximately or exactly equal to the uniform loop of the current 810 plus the electric dipole current 815.

(73) This can be considered as a linear superposition of a uniform loop of current and a pattern with current traveling in opposite directions around the loop on opposite sides. Such latter current exemplary pattern can have a net electric dipole moment, indicated by the dotted arrow 820. This has been demonstrated analytically for loop antennas with non-uniform current. (See, e.g., Reference 8). It can be possible to demonstrate enhanced performance due to the sensitivity to magnetic and electric dipole fields. It can also be possible to, for example, place circular dipoles in close proximity to each other (e.g., spaced with an overlap of about 2 cm for about 16 cm diameter elements), in an arrangement similar to overlapped loop coils. This can provide for the tiling of a surface with a large number of circular dipoles to reap the advantages of highly parallel coil arrays.

(74) Exemplary Loopole Examples

(75) An exemplary circular surface coil with uniform current can be substantially equivalent to a magnetic dipole. However, if the current is not uniform, the field created by the surface coil can be de-convolved into a magnetic dipole and an electric dipole component. (See, e.g., Reference 8). It can be beneficial in an RF coil design to try to maintain a uniform current distribution in a surface coil, using an appropriate amount of distributed capacitance. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, in contrast to the conventional designs, surface coil loops can be provided with a highly non-uniform current distribution in order to capture both magnetic and electric dipole fields in a single structure, which can be referred to here as a loopole. Through appropriate choice of capacitors in the loop, current can be concentrated near the drive point for controlling the degree of current asymmetry.

Further Exemplary Methods

(76) Full wave electromagnetic simulations were performed with the FDTD method (e.g., using CST Microwave Studio). A cylindrical phantom 905 was modeled, for example, with .sub.r of about 81.81, of about 0.604, about 29.5 cm in diameter and about 1.4 m long. Overlapped rectangular coils 910 (e.g., eight) with capacitors 915 (e.g., twelve) each were modeled on a cylindrical surface, for example with diameter of about 31.5 cm about 20 cm along the z direction and about 16 cm wide. (See e.g., FIG. 9).

(77) In an exemplary embodiment of the exemplary array arrangement, all capacitors 920 in the balanced coil can about the same (e.g., about 6.8 pF). As shown in FIG. 9B, the unbalanced elements can have capacitors 920 (e.g., two capacitors) in the long feed leg and can be about 10 pF. Capacitors 925 (e.g., three capacitors) can be positioned in the opposite long leg and can be about 1.5 pF. Capacitors 930 (e.g., three capacitors) can be positioned in each of the short legs, and can be about 6.8 pF. The exemplary coils can be tuned, matched and driven, for example with about 50 ohm ports in simulation.

(78) For experimental verification, two arrays (e.g., eight channel arrays) were constructed with substantially identical dimensions and capacitance values as in the simulation. (See e.g., FIG. 10). The balanced array was driven at the service end to maintain the current balance, and the unbalanced array was driven at the side to enhance the current unbalance. Quarter wavelength (/4) lattice baluns were used to match the coil arrays to coaxial cables.

(79) The constructed arrays were used in transmit receive mode on a 7 T scanner with eight channel parallel transmit (e.g., as available from Siemens of Erlangen Germany). Transmit phases were chosen to align all phases at the center of the phantom. Excitation was calibrated at the center of the phantom using a turbo flash scan with preparation pulse. (See, e.g., Reference 15). Field (B.sub.1.sup.+) maps were obtained, for example with the actual flip angle imagine (AFI) method (see, e.g., Reference 16) and individual coil B.sub.1.sup.+ maps were obtained using a low flip angle GRE. The SNR was calculated using the Kellman method (see, e.g., Reference 1 and 6) from gradient-recalled echo (GRE) acquisitions, both with and without RF excitation (e.g., with TR/TE/Flip/BW of about 2000 ms/3.6 ms/90/300 Hz per pixel, respectively, Matrix=64, FoV of about 320 mm, Slice or about 5 mm).

(80) Exemplary Results and Simulations

(81) The CST simulations achieved better than about 25 dB of match and at worst an isolation of about 14 dB for the balanced and the unbalanced loops. Due to the difficult nature of this analysis, there can be inconsistencies in the display of surface currents in the simulation software.

(82) A graph of the exemplary current density in the phantom is shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B, to illustrate the current unbalance, which was about 3.4:1 for the unbalanced loops (see, e.g., FIG. 11B). Exemplary RF magnetic field (B.sub.1.sup.+) maps for a single balanced loop, unbalanced loop and an electric dipole element are shown in FIGS. 12A-12F. In this example, the electric dipole element was about 36 cm long in Z. The balanced loop exhibits an asymmetric B.sub.1.sup.+ with a strong null, whereas the electric dipole exhibits nearly symmetric B.sub.1.sup.+. The unbalanced loop shows hybrid behavior, with excitation focused near the stronger current side, but with a small side lobe and weak null.

(83) Simulated B.sub.1.sup.+ and SNR maps for the eight channel balanced and unbalanced arrays are shown in FIGS. 13A-13F, 14A-14F, respectively. The B.sub.1.sup.+ (see, e.g., FIGS. 13A and 13F) and SNR (see, e.g., FIGS. 14A-14F) maps were generated in two orientations, where in orientation No. 2 the coil was flipped end to end with respect to orientation No. 1. The balanced loop array and electric dipole array showed almost the same B.sub.1.sup.+ and SNR between orientations. However, the unbalanced array showed a more optimal B.sub.1.sup.+ in orientation No. 1 but with low SNR, whereas it had less than optimal B.sub.1.sup.+ and the highest SNR in orientation No. 2.

(84) This asymmetry can be expected, given the configuration of the ideal current patterns. (See, e.g., Reference 3). The best unbalanced loop B.sub.1.sup.+ was about 18% better than for the balanced loops and about 10% better than for the dipole array, while the best unbalanced loop SNR was better by about 22% and about 13%, respectively.

Exemplary Experiments

(85) The unloaded and loaded Q values for the constructed balanced and unbalanced elements were about 80 and about 6, and about 55 and about 6, respectively, with Q ratios of about 13 and about 9, indicating sample noise dominance. All elements were matched to better than about 20 dB with isolation between elements better than about 15 dB.

(86) Experimentally acquired exemplary B.sub.1.sup.+ maps for the three arrays are shown in FIGS. 15A-15E. There can be a small deviation between the B.sub.1.sup.+ values for the balanced array between the two orientations, but there can still be an increase in central B.sub.1.sup.+ with the unbalanced array in orientation No. 1, which was about 35% higher than the average balanced array value. The overall B.sub.1.sup.+ distributions can be very similar to simulation, with improved uniformity for the unbalanced array in the first orientation. Exemplary central SNR values are shown in FIG. 16, which illustrates a small dependence on orientation for the balanced array, but SNR boost of about 37% for the unbalanced array compared to the average balanced SNR value.

(87) FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating experimental SNR values, which show that the balanced looped and the dipole array have little variation in SNR values based on orientation. However, the unbalanced array in orientation 2 produced the highest SNR of all exemplary cases.

(88) Exemplary Applications

(89) Full wave electromagnetic simulations were performed with the exemplary FDTD method (e.g., CST Microwave Studio). An elliptical phantom was modeled with r=40.5, =0.58 S/m, about 50 cm long, about 29 cm wide and about 19 cm high. Four loopole array elements about 15 cm along z and about 10 cm wide with about 10 capacitors each were modeled on a curved surface. (See e.g., FIG. 18). Each element 1805 had three approximately 18 pF capacitors in the long feed leg, three approximately 3 pF capacitors in the opposite leg and two approximately 15 pF capacitors in each of the short legs. For comparison an offset loop of a known array for spine imaging (see e.g., References 22 and 24), and a known dipole spine array design (see e.g., Reference 23) were modeled and simulated. The offset loop array consisted of three overlapped approximately 1510 cm rectangular loops in which the center loop and one side loop were used for transmit with an about 90 degree transmit phase. The exemplary dipole spine array consisted of two dipoles approximately 37 cm along z separated by about 6 cm driven with optimal phase for a central excitation. To ensure that the exemplary loopole design could provide an adequate z field of view, a two element loopole array with elements overlapped in z direction (see e.g., FIG. 19) was also simulated. All elements were excited with 50 ports in simulation.

(90) For experimental verification, a four element loopole array was constructed to match the simulated model. (See e.g., FIG. 20). A custom built interface was used to excite the loopole array on a 7 T scanner (e.g., Siemens, Erlangen Germany). The loopole array was compared against a custom built spine array based on offset loop design. (See e.g., Reference 24). Transmit phases were chosen to align all phases at the center of the phantom. A series of GRE images with TR=2000 ms, and different RF pulse voltages were acquired. A sine curve was fitted to the pixel intensities to obtain B1+ maps. An SNR was calculated using the Kellman method (see, e.g., Reference 25) from GRE acquisitions both with and without RF excitation, with flip angle calibrated in the spinal cord (e.g., TR/TE/Flip/BW=200 ms/4.07 ms/20/300 Hz per pixel, Matrix=256*256, FoV=320 mm, Slice=3 mm). In-vivo turbo spin echo (TSE) images were acquired in axial (e.g., TR/TE/BW/Slice=5410 ms/71 ms/238 Hz per pixel/2 mm, Matrix=512*512, FoV=200 mm, TF=8, 130 Refocusing, TA=6.36 mins) and coronal planes (TR/TE/BW/Slice=6100 ms/70 ms/238 Hz per pixel/2 mm, Matrix=512*512, FoV=256 mm, TF=8, 130 Refocusing, TA=9:17 mins

(91) Further Exemplary Results and Simulations

(92) Better than about 20 dB match was achieved for all elements in the exemplary array arrangement. Simulations achieved critical decoupling (e.g., S12<25 dB) for the overlapped loopole elements. (See e.g., FIG. 18). S12 coupling between overlapped elements in offset loop array was less than about 20 dB. S12 coupling for the two elements of the dipole array was about 12 dB. Taking SAR as the limiting factor, B1+ maps were generated normalized by SQRT(peak 10 g SAR). (See, e.g., FIG. 21A). The exemplary loopole array achieved at least about a 35% improvement over compared designs for central B1+, because it exhibited lower peak SAR. The loopole array also achieved at least about 25% improvement in B1+ when normalized to square root of absorbed power. The loopole elements tiled along z (see e.g., FIG. 19) achieved critical decoupling (e.g., <28 dB). Sagittal B1+ maps (see e.g., FIG. 22) indicate that although a single loopole element has a shorter z field of view than the about 37 cm dipole, with additional power, extended z loopole array can achieve similar or better coverage than the dipole array.

Further Exemplary Experiments

(93) The Unloaded & Loaded Q values for the loopole elements were about 80 & about 8 respectively. All elements were matched better than about 20 dB with isolation better than about 18 dB. Experimental phantom B1+ maps normalized to excitation voltage (see e.g., FIG. 21B) indicate that the loopole array achieved two-fold improvement in central B1+ efficiency over the offset loop array. In-vivo SNR maps (FIGS. 23A and 23B) indicate that the loopole array achieved on average about 15% SNR improvement in spinal cord and more than about 50% improvement in the disc compared to the offset loop array within the about 15 cm FoV of the loopole. A 65 degree flip angle in the spinal cord was achieved with the available power and standard RF pulses, which was sufficient to generate axial (see e.g., FIG. 24A) and coronal (see e.g., FIG. 24B) T2 weighted images. The in-vivo images demonstrate exquisite anatomical detail for the caudal equina nerve roots in the mid-lumbar spine. These images could significantly improve in-vivo characterization of foraminal and facet joint anatomy prior to spine interventions for pain.

Exemplary Conclusions and Discussion

(94) With the exemplary array of large elements described herein, it can be possible to achieve substantial improvements in B.sub.1.sup.+, and/or SNR, through creating an unbalanced current distribution on the loops. Assuming that these exemplary elements can be capable of capturing magnetic and electric dipole fields, a maximum performance for a particular amount of unbalance can be achieved. Simulations show that loopoles can be overlapped in the z direction for improved coverage. Dense coil arrays can be engineered by overlapped and tiled loopoles, providing the convenience of loop coil design with the performance of electric dipoles.

(95) FIG. 17 shows a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a system according to the present disclosure. For example, exemplary procedures in accordance with the present disclosure described herein can be performed by a processing arrangement and/or a computing arrangement 1702. Such processing/computing arrangement 1702 can be, for example entirely or a part of, or include, but not limited to, a computer/processor 1704 that can include, for example one or more microprocessors, and use instructions stored on a computer-accessible medium (e.g., RAM, ROM, hard drive, or other storage device).

(96) As shown in FIG. 17, for example a computer-accessible medium 1706 (e.g., as described herein above, a storage device such as a hard disk, floppy disk, memory stick, CD-ROM, RAM, ROM, etc., or a collection thereof) can be provided (e.g., in communication with the processing arrangement 1702). The computer-accessible medium 1706 can contain executable instructions 1708 thereon. In addition or alternatively, a storage arrangement 1710 can be provided separately from the computer-accessible medium 1706, which can provide the instructions to the processing arrangement 1702 so as to configure the processing arrangement to execute certain exemplary procedures, processes and methods, as described herein above, for example.

(97) Further, the exemplary processing arrangement 1702 can be provided with or include an input/output arrangement 1714, which can include, for example a wired network, a wireless network, the internet, an intranet, a data collection probe, a sensor, etc. As shown in FIG. 17, the exemplary processing arrangement 1702 can be in communication with an exemplary display arrangement 1712, which, according to certain exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, can be a touch-screen configured for inputting information to the processing arrangement in addition to outputting information from the processing arrangement, for example. Further, the exemplary display 1712 and/or a storage arrangement 1710 can be used to display and/or store data in a user-accessible format and/or user-readable format.

(98) The foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the disclosure. Various modifications and alterations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the teachings herein. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous systems, arrangements, and procedures which, although not explicitly shown or described herein, embody the principles of the disclosure and can be thus within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Various different exemplary embodiments can be used together with one another, as well as interchangeably therewith, as should be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art. In addition, certain terms used in the present disclosure, including the specification, drawings and claims thereof, can be used synonymously in certain instances, including, but not limited to, for example, data and information. It should be understood that, while these words, and/or other words that can be synonymous to one another, can be used synonymously herein, that there can be instances when such words can be intended to not be used synonymously. Further, to the extent that the prior art knowledge has not been explicitly incorporated by reference herein above, it is explicitly incorporated herein in its entirety.

EXEMPLARY REFERENCES

(99) The following references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. [1] Raaijmakers A J E. ISMRM 2013 p. 4382. [2] Wiggins G. ISMRM 2012:541. [3] Graessl A. ISMRM2013:0395. [4] Raaijmakers A J E. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011 66(5):1488-97. [5] Lattanzi R. MRM 68:286-304 (2012) [6] Kellman P. Magn Reson Med 2005 54(6):1439-47. [7] Zhang B. ISMRM 2012:2816. [8] Horner F. Properties of Loop Aerials, The Wireless Engineer, Vol. 25, August 1948 pp. 254-259. [11] Lattanzi R. MRM 68:286-304 (2012) [12] Schnell W. (2000), IEEE Trans Ant Prop 48:418-28. [13] Wiggins G. ISMRM 2013 p. 2737. [14] Eryaman Y. ISMRM 2013 p. 393. [15] Klose U, Med. Phys. 19 (4), 1992. [16] Yarnykh V. MRM 57:192-200 (2007). [17] [1] Horner F. Properties of Loop Aerials, The Wireless Engineer, Vol. 25, August 1948 p 254-259 [18] [2] Lakshmanan K. ISMRM 2014 p 0397 [19] [3] Lakshmanan K. ISMRM 2014 p 0315 [20] [4] Wiggins G. ISMRM 2013 p 2737 [21] [5] Lee W. ISMRM 2013 p 4367 [22] [6] Duan Q. ISMRM 2010 p 51 [23] [7] Duan Q. ISMRM 2014 p 0316 [24] [8] Wiggins G ISMRM 2009 p 2951. [25] [9] Kellman P. MRM 54:1439-1447 (2005)