Exhaust gas purifying catalyst and method for producing the same

Abstract

Provided is an exhaust gas purifying catalyst with an excellent effect of suppressing deterioration due to aggregation of a noble metal catalyst that would occur during endurance at a high temperature. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst includes a porous support and a noble metal catalyst carried on the porous support. The porous support contains particles of an alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide, and the porous support has the following physical property values after subjected to baking at 900 C. for 5 hours: a pore diameter of the particles in the range of 2 to 20 nm, a specific surface area of the particles in the range of 75 to 115 m.sup.2/g, a crystallite size of a ceria-zirconia composite oxide that is contained in the particles in the range of 4 to 6 nm, and a bulk density of the particles in the range of 0.5 to 0.9 cm.sup.3/g.

Claims

1. A method for producing an exhaust gas purifying catalyst, comprising: producing a porous support containing particles of an alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide by preparing an aqueous solution by dissolving a cerium salt compound and a zirconium salt compound in an aqueous solvent, adding an aluminum isopropoxide into the aqueous solution to produce a precursor solution, removing moisture from the precursor solution, and drying and baking a residue; and producing an exhaust gas purifying catalyst by making the porous support carry a noble metal catalyst, wherein the porous support has the following physical property values after subjected to baking at 900 C. for 5 hours: a peak pore diameter of the particles in a range of 7 to 9 nm, a specific surface area of the particles in a range of 75 to 115 m.sup.2/g, a crystallite size of a ceria-zirconia composite oxide that is contained in the particles in a range of 4 to 6 nm, and a bulk density of the particles in a range of 0.5 to 0.9 cm.sup.3/g.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a graph showing the measurement results of the bulk density of a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples.

(2) FIG. 2 is a graph showing the measurement results about the crystallite size of a CZ material as a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples.

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph showing the measurement results of the specific surface area of a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples.

(4) FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphs showing the measurement results of the pore diameter of a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples; specifically, FIG. 4A is a graph showing the measurement results at the initial stage (before endurance) and FIG. 4B shows the measurement results after endurance.

(5) FIG. 5 is a graph showing the measurement results of the peak pore diameter of a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples.

(6) FIG. 6 is a graph showing the measurement results about the Pt crystallite size after endurance of a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples.

(7) FIG. 7 is a graph showing the measurement results of the OSC level after endurance of each of examples and comparative examples.

(8) FIG. 8 is a graph showing the measurement results about the HC 50% purification rate after endurance of each of examples and comparative examples.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENT(S)

(9) Hereinafter, embodiments of the exhaust gas purifying catalyst of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst of the present invention generally includes a porous support and a noble metal catalyst carried on the porous support.

(10) Herein, the porous support is formed of particles of an alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide that has been produced from an aluminum isopropoxide. Based on the results of the experiments described in detail below, the physical property values of the porous support after subjected to baking at 900 C. for 5 hours are defined as follows: a pore diameter of the composite oxide particles in the range of 2 to 20 nm, a specific surface area of the composite oxide particles in the range of 75 to 115 m.sup.2/g, a crystallite size of the ceria-zirconia composite oxide that is contained in the composite oxide particles in the range of 4 to 6 nm, and a bulk density of the composite oxide particles in the range of 0.5 to 0.9 cm.sup.3/g.

(11) In the process of producing the alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide, not ethylene glycol but distilled water was used as a solvent for dissolving Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.36H.sub.2O and ZrO(NO.sub.3).sub.22H.sub.2O, whereby it was found to be possible to increase the specific surface area of the alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide. In addition, the baking conditions were changed from the low-temperature, short-time baking in the conventional production methods to high-temperature, long-time baking (at about 900 C. or higher and for about 5 hours or longer), whereby it was found to be possible to increase the proportion of mesopores with a diameter in the range of about 2 to 50 nm that are formed in the alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide support. Consequently, it was found to be possible to suppress the aggregation of the noble metal catalyst during endurance at a high temperature.

(12) (Various Experiments and Results)

(13) The inventors produced a composite oxide specimen of each of Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 shown below, and then produced an exhaust gas purifying catalyst by making each composite oxide carry a noble metal catalyst.

EXAMPLE 1

(14) 47.1 g Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O and 52.1 g ZrO(NO.sub.3).sub.2.2H.sub.2O were dissolved in 400 cc (cm.sup.3) distilled water, and the mixture was agitated at 85 C. Then, 80.1 g Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was slowly added to the mixture while the dissolution was being checked. After the dissolution, moisture was completely removed at 90 C. with a rotary evaporator, and baking was performed at 900 C. for 5 hours to produce a composite oxide of Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CeO.sub.2:ZrO.sub.2 with a ratio of 32:30:38.

EXAMPLE 2

(15) A composite oxide was produced under the same conditions as those in Example 1 except that the amount of distilled water in Example 1 was changed to 800 cc.

EXAMPLE 3

(16) A composite oxide was produced under the same conditions as those in Example 1 except that the amount of distilled water in Example 1 was changed to 1200 cc.

EXAMPLE 4

(17) A composite oxide was produced under the same conditions as those in Example 1 except that 8 cc 60% nitric acid was added after Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was dissolved in Example 1.

EXAMPLE 5

(18) A composite oxide was produced under the same conditions as those in Example 1 except that 4 cc 60% nitric acid was added after Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was dissolved in Example 2.

EXAMPLE 6

(19) A composite oxide was produced under the same conditions as those in Example 1 except that 8 cc 60% nitric acid was added after Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was dissolved in Example 2.

EXAMPLE 7

(20) 25.3 g Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O and 47.7 g ZrO(NO.sub.3).sub.2.2H.sub.2O were dissolved in 600 cc (cm.sub.3) distilled water, and the mixture was agitated at 85 C. Then, 60.2 g Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was slowly added to the mixture while the dissolution was being checked. After the dissolution, moisture was completely removed at 90 C. with a rotary evaporator, and baking was performed at 900 C. for 5 hours to produce a composite oxide of Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CeO.sub.2:ZrO.sub.2 with a ratio of 32:21:47.

EXAMPLE 8

(21) 70.7 g Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O and 78.2 g ZrO(NO.sub.3).sub.2.2H.sub.2O were dissolved in 1500 cc (cm.sup.3) distilled water, and the mixture was agitated at 85 C. Then, 384.3 g Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was slowly added to the mixture while the dissolution was being checked. After the dissolution, moisture was completely removed at 90 C. with a rotary evaporator, and baking was performed at 900 C. for 5 hours to produce a composite oxide of Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CeO.sub.2:ZrO.sub.2 with a ratio of 60:18:22.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1

(22) Instead of Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3, 147 g Al(NO.sub.3).sub.3.9H.sub.2O that contains nitrate was used to produce a 1 L aqueous nitrate solution containing Al, Ce, Zr. Then, an aqueous sodium carbonate solution was added until the pH became 10 and a precipitate was generated. Then, cleaning through filtration was conducted five times, which was then followed by drying at 120 C. and baking at 900 C. for 5 hours so that a composite oxide was produced.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2

(23) A composite oxide was produced under the same conditions as those in Comparative Example 1 except that, instead of sodium carbonate in Comparative Example 1, an aqueous ammonia solution was used and added until the pH became 10 and a precipitate was generated.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3

(24) In Example 1, a solution obtained by dissolving 47.1 g Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O in 100 cc ethylene glycol was produced in advance, and the solution was added after Al(OC.sub.3H.sub.7).sub.3 was added. This is the same method as that described in an embodiment of Patent Document 1 (JP 3379369 B) above.

(25) <Method for Evaluating the Catalyst Performance>

(26) An exhaust gas purifying catalyst was produced by making each of the composite oxides of Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 carry 1 mass % Pt, and then, an endurance test at 1100 C. for 5 hours was executed on each exhaust gas purifying catalyst to evaluate the performance thereof after the endurance test.

(27) <Results of Experiments>

(28) FIGS. 1 to 5 and Table 1 show the measurement results before the endurance tests, and FIGS. 6 to 8 and Table 2 show the results of the catalyst performance after the endurance tests. Herein, FIG. 1 is a graph showing the measurement results of the bulk density of each specimen. FIG. 2 is a graph showing the measurement results about the crystallite size of a CZ material of each specimen. FIG. 3 is a graph showing the measurement results of the specific surface area of each specimen. FIG. 4 are graphs showing the measurement results of the pore diameter of each specimen; specifically, FIG. 4A is a graph showing the measurement results at the initial stage (before endurance) and FIG. 4B shows the measurement results after endurance. FIG. 5 is a graph showing the measurement results of the peak pore diameter of a composite oxide of each of examples and comparative examples.

(29) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Peak Pore 9 7 7 8 9 7 8 7 Diameter (nm) Bulk Density 0.678 0.73 0.71 0.847 0.793 0.806 0.53 0.71 (cm.sup.3/g) Specific Surface 94.6 91.6 89.9 84.6 86.4 87.2 75 115 Area (m.sup.2/g) Crystallite Size of 4.9 5 5 4.8 5 4.7 6 5 CZ Material (nm) Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Peak Pore 13 30 11 Diameter (nm) Bulk Density 1.43 1.74 0.685 (cm.sup.3/g) Specific Surface 74.5 79.7 36.9 Area (m.sup.2/g) Crystallite Size of 7.1 6.7 5.2 CZ Material (nm)

(30) First, referring to FIG. 1 and Table 1, the bulk density of each specimen was measured in accordance with JIS R1628:1997. FIG. 1 can confirm that the bulk density of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 is in the range of 0.7 to 1.7 cm.sup.3/g, while the bulk density of each of Examples 1 to 8 is in the range of 0.5 to 0.9 cm.sup.3/g, which is about a half that of Comparative Example 1 or 2. This means that the amount of the catalyst that can be applied to a monolith in each of Examples 1 to 8 is about double that of Comparative Example 1 or 2.

(31) Next, referring to FIG. 2 and Table 1, the crystallite size of the CZ material of each specimen was measured using an X-ray diffraction method in accordance with JIS H7805:2005. FIG. 2 can confirm that the crystallite size of the CZ material of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 is in the range of 5 to 7 nm, while the crystallite size of the CZ material of each of Examples 1 to 8 is in the range of 4 to 6 nm.

(32) Next, referring to FIG. 3 and Table 1, the specific surface area of each specimen was measured in accordance with JIS R1626:1996. FIG. 3 can confirm that the specific surface area of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 is in the range of 35 to 80 m.sup.2/g, while the specific surface area of each of Examples 1 to 8 is in the range of 75 to 115 m.sup.2/g.

(33) Next, referring to FIG. 4A, Example 3 and Comparative Example 2 that exhibited favorable results of the endurance tests were extracted to measure the initial pore diameters of the specimens before the endurance tests. Distributions of the pore diameters are shown herein. It is seen that the peak of the pore diameter of Example 3 is in the range of 2 to 20 nm. It should be noted that the peak of the pore diameter of Comparative Example 2 is in the range of about 10 to 70 nm.

(34) FIG. 4B can confirm that a distribution of the pore diameter of Example 3 after the endurance test has a peak in the range of about 20 to 70 nm, and that of Comparative Example 2 after the endurance test has a peak in the range of about 70 to 120 nm. Thus, it is found that the pore diameter of each specimen has changed from the result shown in FIG. 4A by several tens of nm.

(35) Next, from FIG. 5 and Table 1, it is found that the peak of the pore diameter (i.e., peak pore diameter) of the CZ material of each of the specimens of Examples 1 to 8, which has been measured with a nitrogen adsorption method, is less than or equal to 10 nm, while that of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 tends to be over 10 nm.

(36) Next, evaluation of the catalyst performance after endurance will be discussed with reference to FIGS. 6 to 8 and Table 2. Herein, FIG. 6 is a graph showing the measurement results about the Pt crystallite size after endurance of each specimen. FIG. 7 is a graph showing the measurement results of the OSC level after endurance of each specimen. FIG. 8 is a graph showing the measurement results about the HC 50% purification rate after endurance of each specimen.

(37) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Pt Grain Size after 35.6 33.9 32.1 36 33.2 34.7 36 31 Endurance (nm) OSC Level after 1.9 2 2.2 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.65 Endurance (a.u.) HC 50% 480 469 464 477 469 470 473 465 Purification Rate after Endurance Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Pt Grain Size after 53.1 55.2 39.1 Endurance (nm) OSC Level after 1.4 1.5 1.6 Endurance (a.u.) HC 50% 511 505 486 Purification Rate after Endurance

(38) Referring to FIG. 6 and Table 2, the Pt crystallite size of each specimen was measured using an X-ray diffraction method in accordance with JIS H7805:2005. FIG. 6 can confirm that the Pt grain size after endurance of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 is as large as about 40 to 55 nm, while the Pt grain size after endurance of each of Examples 1 to 8 is about 31 to 36 nm, which are much smaller than those of the comparative examples.

(39) This is because the aggregation of Pt during endurance at a high temperature is suppressed in Examples 1 to 8.

(40) Next, from FIG. 7 and Table 2, it is found that the OSC level (oxygen storage capacity) after endurance of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 is 1.4 to 1.6 (a.u.), while the OSC level after endurance of each of Examples 1 to 8 is 1.65 to 2.2 (a.u.), which are higher than those of the comparative examples by 40% or more.

(41) Further, from FIG. 8 and Table 2, it is found that the HC 50% purification rate after endurance of each of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 is about 490 to 510, while the HC 50% purification rate after endurance of each of Examples 1 to 8 is about 460 to 480, which shows that the HC purification performance of each example is high.

(42) Based on the results in FIGS. 1 to 5, the following conditions were defined for particles of an alumina-ceria-zirconia composite oxide that forms the exhaust gas purifying catalyst of the present invention: a pore diameter of the composite oxide particles in the range of 2 to 20 nm, a specific surface area of the composite oxide particles in the range of 75 to 115 m.sup.2/g, a crystallite size of the ceria-zirconia composite oxide that is contained in the composite oxide particles in the range of 4 to 6 nm, and a bulk density of the composite oxide particles in the range of 0.5 to 0.9 cm.sup.3/g.

(43) In addition, the results in FIGS. 6 to 8 demonstrate that according to the exhaust gas purifying catalyst containing the composite oxide of the present invention, it is possible to effectively suppress the aggregation of a noble metal catalyst after the endurance tests, increase the OSC level, and increase the HC purification rate.

(44) Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the drawings, specific configurations are not limited thereto. The present invention includes any changes in the design and the like that are within the spirit and scope of the present invention.