GPS HOLDOVER WITH SELECTED BIT PREDICTION OR OMISSION

Abstract

The present disclosure is directed to utilities (methods, systems, apparatuses) associated with improving the signal-to-noise ratio of a wireless signal at a receiver. It is known in the art to correlate a received signal with a replica signal generated at the receiver to improve reception. However, the inventors have determined that correlation using a replica signal which is not completely accurate may be detrimental. An improved method of correlation disclosed herein includes identifying data bits which are predictable and performing correlation with respect to those data bits while ignoring data bits which are identified as unpredictable. This method may have particular advantages in the case of receivers having attenuated reception (e.g., indoors) after losing a data connection used for receipt of assistance data.

Claims

1. A method for continued tracking of a broadcast positioning system signal upon loss of connectivity to assistance data regarding the broadcast positioning system signal, comprising: determining a loss of connectivity to assistance data regarding a broadcast positioning system signal at a receiver; receiving, at the receiver, the broadcast positioning system signal comprising encoded data bits, the encoded data bits comprising predictable bits and unpredictable bits, wherein the encoded data bits are predictable or unpredictable based upon a structure of the encoded data bits defined in positioning system signal information available in the absence of connectivity to the assistance data; and integrating the encoded data bits over an integration period, wherein the unpredictable bits of the encoded data bits are not summed in the integrating and the predictable bits of the encoded data bits are summed in the integrating.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the broadcast positioning system signal originates from a global navigation by satellite system and comprises a coarse acquisition code and a navigation message code comprising a plurality of navigation messages.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the assistance data comprises a plurality of duplicate navigation messages, each duplicate navigation message simulating a corresponding navigation message of the navigation message code.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the structure of the encoded data bits comprises an architecture common to each navigation message, the architecture including a plurality of pages, each page comprising a plurality of subframes, each subframe comprising a plurality of words, and each word comprising a plurality of data bits, wherein values of predictable bits are predictable based upon positions of the predictable bits within the architecture.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the predictable bits comprise a telemetry word and a handover word of the navigation message code.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the predictable bits further comprise at least one of almanac information and ephemeris information pertaining to satellite vehicles.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the unpredictable bits comprise ephemeris information updated by a control segment to at least one satellite vehicle of the global navigation by satellite system subsequent to receipt of assistance data comprising a first duplicate navigation message at the receiver via a data network connection, the first duplicate navigation message identifying values of data bits in a first navigation message of the broadcast positioning system signal.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the positioning system signal information comprises the first duplicate navigation message received at the receiver prior to the loss of connectivity to the assistance data.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein: the coarse acquisition code comprises a first encoded data rate corresponding to a first bit length and the navigation message code comprises a second encoded data rate corresponding to a second bit length, wherein the first encoded data rate is higher than the second encoded data rate such that the first bit length is shorter than the second bit length, and the navigation message code modulates the coarse acquisition code; a duration of the integration period is greater than the second bit length; and the unpredictable bits comprise known bit values of the coarse acquisition code modulated by unknown bits of the navigation message code, and the predictable bits comprise known bit values of the coarse acquisition code modulated by known bits of the navigation message code.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising: predicting values of data bits to be received in a second navigation message subsequent to the loss of connectivity to the assistance data, the predicting based at least in part on the first duplicate navigation message; demodulating, at the receiver, first portions of the second navigation message comprising the predictable bits; coherently integrating the first portions; and placing the receiver into a holdover mode during at least one of receipt and processing of second portions of the second navigation message comprising the unpredictable bits.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the holdover mode comprises maintaining a time according to a local clock at the receiver utilizing an oscillator associated with the local clock without electrically steering a frequency of the oscillator.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the predicting comprises: extracting, from the first duplicate navigation message, known values of data bits which are expected to remain unchanged in subsequent navigation messages including at least the second navigation message; extracting, from the first duplicate navigation message, known values of data bits which are expected to change in accordance with absolute time such that corresponding data bits in the second navigation message are predictable based upon time and the known values of the data bits of the first duplicate navigation message; and predicting a value of at least one data bit to be received from the global navigation by satellite system in the second navigation message based upon a known time and a value of a corresponding data bit observed in the first duplicate navigation message.

13-14. (canceled)

15. An apparatus for continued tracking of a broadcast positional system signal upon loss of connectivity to assistance data regarding the broadcast positional system signal, comprising: a network adapter providing the apparatus with access to assistance data available via a network connection; a receiver operative to receive a broadcast positioning system signal comprising encoded data bits, the encoded data bits comprising predictable bits and unpredictable bits; a bit predictor operative to determine which of the encoded data bits are predictable based upon a structure of the encoded data bits defined in positioning system signal information available in the absence of connectivity to the assistance data and predict a phase of each of the predictable bits; and an integration module operative to integrate the encoded data bits over an integration period, wherein the unpredictable bits of the encoded data bits are not summed and the predictable bits of the encoded data bits are summed.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the broadcast positioning system signal originates from a global navigation by satellite system and comprises a coarse acquisition code and a navigation message code comprising a plurality of navigation messages.

17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the assistance data comprises a plurality of duplicate navigation messages, each duplicate navigation message simulating a corresponding navigation message of the navigation message code, wherein the structure of the encoded data bits comprises an architecture common to each navigation message, the architecture including a plurality of pages, each page comprising a plurality of subframes, each subframe comprising a plurality of words, and each word comprising a plurality of data bits, wherein values of the predictable bus are predictable based upon positions of the predictable bits within the architecture.

18. (canceled)

19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the predictable bits comprise a telemetry word and a handover word of the navigation message code, and wherein the predictable bits further comprise at least one of almanac information and ephemeris information pertaining to satellite vehicles.

20. (canceled)

21. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the unpredictable bits comprise ephemeris information updated by a control segment to at least one satellite vehicle of the global navigation by satellite system subsequent to receipt of assistance data comprising a first duplicate navigation message at the receiver via a data network connection, the first duplicate navigation message identifying values of data bits in a first navigation message of the broadcast positioning system signal, wherein the positioning system signal information comprises the first duplicate navigation message received at the receiver prior to the loss of connectivity to the assistance data.

22. (canceled)

23. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein: the coarse acquisition code comprises a first encoded data rate corresponding to a first bit length and the navigation message code comprises a second encoded data rate corresponding to a second bit length, wherein the first encoded data rate is higher than the second encoded data rate such that the first bit length is shorter than the second bit length, and the navigation message code modulates the coarse acquisition code; a duration of the integration period is greater than the second bit length; the unpredictable bits comprise known bit values of the coarse acquisition code modulated by unknown bits of the navigation message code, and the predictable bits comprise known bit values of the coarse acquisition code modulated by known bits of the navigation message code; wherein the bit predictor is operative to predict values of data bits to be received in a second navigation message subsequent to the loss of connectivity to the assistance data based at least in part on the first duplicate navigation message; and the receiver is further operative to: demodulate first portions of the second navigation message comprising the predictable bits; coherently integrate the first portions, and initiate a holdover mode during at least one of receipt and processing of second portions of the second navigation message comprising the unpredictable bits.

24. (canceled)

25. The apparatus of claim 23, further comprising: a local clock, wherein the holdover mode comprises maintaining a time according to the local clock utilizing an oscillator associated with the local clock without electrically steering a frequency of the oscillator.

26. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the bit predictor is operative to: extract, from the first duplicate navigation message, known values of data bits which are expected to remain unchanged in subsequent navigation messages including at least the second navigation message; extract, from the first duplicate navigation message, known values of data bits which are expected to change in accordance with absolute time such that corresponding data bits in the second navigation message are predictable based upon time and the known values of the data bits of the first duplicate navigation message; and predict a value of at least one data bit to be received from the global navigation by satellite system in the second navigation message based upon a known time and a value of a corresponding data bit observed in the first duplicate navigation message.

27-28. (canceled)

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0050] FIG. 1 illustrates the basic concept of modulating various signals into a composite broadcast signal.

[0051] FIG. 2 is a visual depiction of the architecture of the TLM and HOW of each subframe.

[0052] FIGS. 3-5 are visual depictions of the architecture of Subframes 1-3.

[0053] FIG. 6 illustrates the modulation of navigation message data with an SV's C/A signal.

[0054] FIG. 7 illustrates three examples of replica signals and the resulting signal degradation graphs.

[0055] FIG. 8 graphically depicts empirical results of a test simulation.

[0056] FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of an apparatus for receiving and processing signals according to the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0057] While this disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the disclosure to the particular form disclosed, but rather, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope as defined by the claims.

[0058] FIG. 1 illustrates the basic concept of modulating various signals into a composite broadcast signal. The navigation message code 103 is modulated into the C/A code 102 as further explained in reference to FIG. 6 below. The resulting modulated code is then modulated into the carrier signal 101. Notably, this exemplary embodiment is specific to the L1 carrier signal of a GPS system but the concepts may be similarly applied to any broadcast positioning system such as L5 GPS, other GNSS systems, or LORAN.

[0059] As mentioned above, a standard GPS navigation message is composed of twenty-five pages. Each page is composed of five subframes; each subframe is comprised of ten words; and each word contains twenty-four data bits together with six parity bits (i.e. thirty bits/word). Some of the information in a navigation message changes frequently and is unpredictable, some changes rarely and can be predictable for a period of time, some can be calculated based upon a known value at a previous point in time and a length of time since elapsed, and some essentially never changes and is predictable. In this regard, by knowing which bits of a navigation message correspond to the various pieces of information contained in navigation messages, one can determine whether or not a bit is predictable, predictable until a given time, or unpredictable.

[0060] Subframes 1, 2, and 3 of each page of a navigation message comprise ephemeris data (fifteen parameters which describe the orbit of an individual satellite plus the clock correction polynomial). These parameters are typically uploaded by the control segment every two hours. In other words, the bits associated with these subframes may be entirely predictable for up to two hours following the most recent update. Following an update, only a portion of these subframes remains predictable, as discussed below.

[0061] Subframes 4 and 5 of each page comprise almanac data, together with a few other slowly changing (e.g., predictable) data fields. Typically, Subframes 4 & 5 are uploaded daily which means, the data contained therein may be reliably predicted until the next scheduled upload (up to twenty-four hours).

[0062] All subframes start with a Telemetry word (TLM) 200 in the Word 1 position followed by a Handover word (HOW) 205 in the Word 2 position. As shown in FIG. 2 reproduced from ICD-GPS-200C, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, the TLM includes a static preamble (8 bits) 201, fourteen data bits of a TLM message 202 which rarely change, two reserved bits (Bits 23 & 24) 203 which also rarely change, and six parity bits 204. The HOW 205 begins with seventeen bits dedicated to conveying the current truncated Time of Week (TOW) 206 which may be multiplied by 1.5 to calculate the full TOW. Bit 18 of the HOW is an Alert flag 207, which may be used to indicate that the satellite may be transmitting unreliable data, and Bit 19 is an Anti-spoof flag 208. Both of these bits rarely change. Bits 20, 21, and 22 are used indicate the current subframe (i.e., 1-5) as a subframe ID 209, and are therefore entirely predictable given an accurate time. Further, Bits 29 and 30 of parity bits 210 are both zero and Bits 23 and 24 are calculated to preserve the effectiveness of a parity check while allowing Bits 29 and 30 to be zero.

[0063] The value, D, of a word's 24 data bearing bits may be calculated as:

D.sub.i=d.sub.iD.sub.30*i=1, . . . ,24,

where D.sub.30* is the value of the previous word's 30.sup.th parity bit ( denotes modulo 2 addition). The value of the last two parity bits of a word may be calculated as:
D.sub.29=D.sub.30*d.sub.1d.sub.3d.sub.5d.sub.7d.sub.9d.sub.10d.sub.14d.sub.15d.sub.16d.sub.17d.sub.18d.sub.21d.sub.22d.sub.24,
and
D.sub.30=D.sub.29*d.sub.3d.sub.5d.sub.6d.sub.8d.sub.9d.sub.10d.sub.11d.sub.13d.sub.15d.sub.19d.sub.22d.sub.23d.sub.24,
where D.sub.29* is the 29.sup.th parity bit from the previous word.

[0064] Therefore, given that Bits 23 & 24 of the TLM word 200, and the Alert 207 and Anti-spoof 208 flags in the HOW 205 do not change, given a reliably accurate time, all bits in the first two words are entirely predictable regardless of whether or not the ephemeris or almanac data that follows the two words has changed. Specifically, assuming prior receipt of a navigation message either from a previous PNT signal or from a network connection, and assuming no new data has been uploaded by the control segment, it is possible to predict the HOW words for each of the subframes in all the twenty-five pages and re-compute all the parity bits with no errors. This could be the case for up to two hours, at which point a new ephemeris upload would likely occur. Further, even assuming a new upload of ephemeris (but not almanac) had occurred, it would still be possible to predict all the data bits in Subframes 4-5, and the TLM word and HOW in Subframes 1-3 for a period of up to a day, given accurate time. In this scenario, it would be possible to predict Words 1 & 2 (out of 10) for Subframes 1-3 as well as all ten words of Subframes 4-5. Therefore, a receiver may predict a fraction of a navigation message equal to:

((2 words/10 words*3 subframes)+2 subframes)/5 subframes=0.52.

This percentage of the navigation message being predictable would lead to a SNR degradation of:

10Log.sub.10(0.52)2.84 dB.

At a point in time at which both ephemeris and almanac data have been updated since the most recent assistance data was received, the fraction of predictable bits would drop to:

(2 words/10 words*5 subframes)/5 subframes=0.2,

with a corresponding SNR degradation of:

10Log.sub.10(0.2)6.99 dB.

[0065] FIGS. 3-5 are visual depictions of the architecture and contents of Subframes 1-3. Subframes 4-5 have been omitted as they are generally more complex and change frequently from one page to the next. For more detailed information with regard to the contents of the subframes, please see ICD-GPS-200C or subsequent interface control documents released by the U.S. government. It should be appreciated that despite Subframes 4-5 being complex and their contents changing frequently, the values of the data bits in these subframes may be reliably predicted given accurate time.

[0066] Subframes 1-3 include ephemeris and clock parameters for the transmitting SV while Subframes 4-5 contain almanac data as well as ionospheric and tropospheric parameters. The ephemeris parameters typically consist of:

[0067] six Keplerian elements: [0068] M.sub.0 (mean anomaly); [0069] .sub.0 (argument of the line of ascending nodes); [0070] I.sub.0 (nominal inclination of the orbit to the equatorial plane); [0071] (argument of the periapsis); [0072] A (square root of the semi major axis); [0073] e (eccentricity of the orbit);

[0074] three rates: [0075] (rate of change of the inclination); [0076] {dot over ()} (precession of the line of ascending nodes); [0077] n (the correction to the mean motion);

[0078] and six sinusoidal perturbation elements: [0079] C.sub.is, C.sub.ic, C.sub.rs, C.sub.rc, C.sub.us, C.sub.uc,
which are perturbations to the inclination, the semi-major axis and the argument of the latitude (respectively).

[0080] The clock parameters are a.sub.f0, a.sub.f1, a.sub.f2 (offset, rate, and, drift rate respectively). Additional time parameters include t.sub.OE (time of ephemeris), toc (time of clock), and week number (WN), all of which (similar to the HOW) can be calculated from previously received assistance data. Moreover, the T.sub.GD (theoretic group delay) will not change between ephemeris uploads whose ID is captured in the IODE (issue of data ephemeris). There are also reserved data bits which seldom change between IODEs.

[0081] FIG. 6 illustrates the modulation of navigation message 602 data bits with an SV's C/A code 601. This process may occur at the SV prior to modulation with and transmission of the carrier signal and/or may occur at the receiver in the generation of a replica signal. The C/A code signal 601 is illustrated as a series of chips having positive or negative polarities with vertical transitions therebetween. The navigation message code 602 is similarly illustrated but with longer intervals between transitions representing the lower frequency of the navigation message code 602 with respect to the C/A code signal 601. The navigation message code 602 may be modulated into the C/A code signal 601 by flipping the polarity of each chip of the C/A code corresponding to a negative polarity of the navigation message code 602. In this regard, a positive chip of the C/A code signal 601 modulated with a negative polarity of the navigation message code 602 will be flipped to become negative and a positive chip of the C/A code signal 601 modulated with a positive polarity of the navigation message code 602 will remain positive. In this regard, the portions of modulated signal 603 illustrated with solid lines are identical to the respective portions of the C/A code signal 601 because they are modulated with positive polarities of the navigation message code 602. In contrast, the portions of modulated signal 603 illustrated with dashed lines are flipped (i.e., inverse) as compared to the respective portions of the C/A code signal 601 because they are modulated with negative polarities of the navigation message code 602.

[0082] As mentioned above, each navigation message data bit of 20 ms modulates twenty 1 ms epochs of C/A code. If a data bit value is unknown and unpredictable, a receiver may assume that out of all of the C/A chip values, 50% will have the correct polarity and 50% will not. If a receiver were to integrate these unknown data bits, this integration will reduce the SNR of the signal by virtue of the bits of C/A code having an incorrect polarity due to the unknown and unpredictable navigation bits. However, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention, if a receiver simply temporarily stops the integration of the C/A code and instead bridges over the unknown data bits, then the correlation may be maintained accurately and a degree of degradation may be avoided as illustrated by the three examples of replica signals shown in FIG. 7. Graph 701 illustrates the correlation that would result from integration of an exact replica 705 of the SV signal with the SV signal 704. In other words, a receiver which knows every bit of the navigation message signal can construct an exact replica signal 705 yielding an ideal signal to noise ratio line 708 which steadily climbs over time. However, in the absence of assistance data being received at a receiver, it is unlikely that the receiver will be able to construct an exact replica signal 705. Typically, without assistance data, a receiver will construct an errant replica 706 with some incorrect data bits which will lead to an SNR resembling graph 702. In this example, the incorrectly guessed or assumed unpredictable data bits will cause degradation. This is illustrated by a decrease in SNR corresponding to the incorrect data bits, which will result in a substantial departure from the ideal SNR line 708. In contrast, and in accordance with an aspect of the present invention, graph 703 illustrates that bridging over (i.e., disregarding) unpredictable bits in a replica signal 707 during integration will yield a correlation solution which is less than the ideal SNR line 708 (i.e., exact replica) but an improvement upon the traditional approach 702.

[0083] FIG. 8 graphically depicts empirical results of a test simulation that compared the two above-discussed methods (i.e., integrating with incorrect C/A chip values versus integrating without chip values corresponding to unpredictable navigation bits) to determine whether or not it is beneficial to bridge the unpredictable navigation bits instead of including them in integration. The simulation tested scenarios in which 0%, 25%, 50% and 100% of the data bits were flipped in relation to the previously received assistance data. The reference point for the simulation was the sensitivity of a receiver when no data bits were flipped and the integration period was 1 second (in other words, essentially perfect integration of 1,000 epochs). Notably, the method utilized is practicable to any integration period, for example, that is a multiple of 20 ms. As shown in FIG. 8, the simulation indicates that in each scenario the sensitivity lost through coherent integration is less when the receiver simply avoids or bridges across the unknown data bits 802 rather than performing an integration which includes them 801.

[0084] FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 900 in accordance with the present disclosure. The apparatus may include a network adapter 904, a receiver 901, a processor 902, a clock 905, and memory 903. The processor 902 and memory 903 may operate in a coordinated fashion to execute the functions described herein associated with a bit predictor and an integration module. The network adapter 904 may provide the apparatus with access to assistance data via any appropriate network connection.

[0085] While the foregoing has illustrated and described several embodiments in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description is to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive in character. For example, certain embodiments described hereinabove may be combinable with other described embodiments and/or arranged in other ways (e.g., process elements may be performed in other sequences). Accordingly, it should be understood that only a preferred embodiment and variants thereof have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the disclosure are desired to be protected.