Method for preventing microbial growth on a filtration membrane

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for preventing microbial growth on a filtration membrane during desalination process. The method comprises that the membrane is exposed to a low concentration of performic acid by continuously or intermittently introducing performic acid to the membrane surface. When performic acid is added according to the present invention to the water flow, there is no significant reduction in the water flux through the membrane.

Claims

1. A method for prevention of microbial growth on a filtration membrane in a desalination system during a desalination process of sea water or brackish water, the method consists of exposing the filtration membrane to performic acid by continuously or intermittently introducing 0.4-1 mg/l performic acid to a sea water or a brackish water flow contacting a membrane surface of the filtration membrane at the same time as the desalination system is functioning without interruption, wherein a water flux through the membrane remains greater than 85% of an original water flux throughout the desalination process.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the membrane is exposed to performic acid by continuously introducing performic acid to the sea water or the brackish water flow contacting the membrane surface for at least 12 hours.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sea water comprises total dissolved solid from 30 to 50 g/l and the brackish water comprises total dissolved solid from 0.5 to 30 g/l.

4. A method for prevention of microbial growth on a filtration membrane in a desalination system during a desalination process of sea water or brackish water, the method consists of exposing the filtration membrane to performic acid by continuously or intermittently introducing 0.4-1 mg/l performic acid to a sea water or a brackish water flow contacting a membrane surface of the filtration membrane at the same time as the desalination system is functioning without interruption, wherein a saline water flux through the membrane remains greater than 85% of an original water flux throughout the desalination process, and wherein performic acid does not damage the filtration membrane.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the membrane is exposed to performic acid by continuously introducing performic acid to the sea water or the brackish water flow contacting the membrane surface for at least 12 hours.

6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the sea water comprises total dissolved solid from 30 to 50 g/l and the brackish water comprises total dissolved solid from 0.5 to 30 g/l.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the desalination process is not interrupted for filtration membrane cleaning.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows a comparison between permeate flux, A: control, B: with PFA addition.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(2) It has now been found that an excellent effect is achieved by adding performic acid continuously or intermittently to water flow contacting membrane surface during desalination process.

(3) Thus, according to the invention, a method for the prevention of microbial growth on membranes is provided, wherein the oxidizer does not damage the membrane.

(4) Water to be treated by desalination refers here in particular to saline water which comprises of total dissolved solid from 0.5 to 50 g/l preferably from 1 to 40 g/l.

(5) Performic acid can be added continuously or intermittently to water flow which comes into contact with filtration membrane. It is crucial that the adding is directed to the substantially same water fraction, which subsequently reaches the membrane.

(6) PFA can be added continuously or intermittently at the same time as desalination plant is functioning without interruption, which is a significant advantage. Continuously introducing performic acid to water flow contacting membrane surface means that performic acid is added continuously to flowing water which comes into contact with the filtration membrane.

(7) Continuously means at least 12 hours, in some embodiments of at least 18 hours, in some embodiments of at least 24 hours, typically at least one week up to for example 4 weeks, in some embodiments up to 8 weeks depending on the duration of the process. In fact, continuous adding does not have upper time limit; it is interrupted, when the desalination process is interrupted for other reasons.

(8) Although there are no disadvantages of introducing PFA continuously to water flow contacting membrane surface, PFA can be introduced also intermittently.

(9) Intermittently means that there can be breaks in the performic acid addition. For example in some cases where the biological potential for fouling of the membranes is only moderate, an intermittent treatment can be applied, i.e. for the whole time of operating the desalination membrane system the PFA dosing can be cyclically on and off.

(10) The break in performic acid addition can be from 5 seconds to 4 hours, in some embodiments, from 5 minutes to 3 hours, in other embodiments from 10 minutes to 2 hours, typically from 15 minutes to 1 hour. The duration of the break in adding performic acid depends on how high the risk of biofouling is which is effected by for example purity of water and temperature.

(11) Number of the breaks is not limited. The number of the breaks can be one or more. The number of the breaks depends on how high the risk of biofouling is. For example, in cases where the biological potential for fouling of the membranes is low, the number of the breaks can be higher than in the cases where the biological potential for fouling of the membranes is high.

(12) Performic acid is introduced to water flow contacting membrane surface in such an amount that the concentration in water flow contacting membrane surface is in some embodiments 0.1 to 10 mg/l PFA, in other embodiments 0.2 to 5 mg/l. According to a preferred embodiment PFA is added in such an amount that the concentration in water flow contacting membrane surface is 0.4-1 mg/l.

(13) The temperature during the process may be 10 to 40 C., in some embodiments 20 to 25 C.

(14) The term water flux refers here to the flow rate of water through membrane. When the filtration membrane is fouled the flux decreases. When performic acid is added according to the present invention to the water flow, there is no significant reduction in the flux. The change in flux is less than 15%, preferably less than 10%, more preferably less than 5%.

(15) According to one particularly preferred embodiment of the invention performic acid is used as an equilibrium solution. The equilibrium solution can be made by mixing formic acid solution with hydrogen peroxide solution and adding strong acid, for example sulphuric acid as a catalyst.

(16) Performic acid is able to kill efficiently and quickly all kind of biofilm forming microorganisms present in waters, such as aerobic bacteria, facultatively anaerobic bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria, bacteria forming biofilms, yeasts, moulds, and protozoa, and prevent their growth. PFA is able to kill in particular freely swimming microbes in water. The killing effect is based on the capability of PFA to reach the membrane surface of the target microbes.

(17) The results of the experiments showed clearly that there is no significant reduction in the flux when performic acid is added to water during desalination process. As a consequence costs are reduced, when the desalination process need not be interrupted for filtration membrane cleaning. In addition membranes function reliably and for longer times. The invention will now be described in more detail by means of the following non-limiting examples.

Example 1

(18) Flux and salt rejection of fresh membrane were measured before and after soaking. The membrane was placed in a flat sheet cell (Alfa Laval LabM20). The operating conditions were, feed pressure 20 bar (for sea water membrane 55 bar), salt (synthetic sea water prepared according to ASTM standard D1141), temperature 25 C. The flux measurement was done for 3 hours.

(19) Soaking was done by mixing biocide with synthetic sea water. The concentration of the added biocide in the synthetic sea water was for PFA 14 and 84 mg/l as active substance, for peracetic acid (PAA) 7, 18 and 35 mg/l as active substance and sodium hypochlorite 20 mg/l as active substance. PFA was added to the synthetic seawater as an equilibrium solution having PFA content 14 weight-%, PAA was added as an equilibrium solution having PAA content 35 weight-% and sodium hypochlorite having concentration of 15 weight-%.

(20) The soaking time was 24 or 144 hours. Performic acid equilibrium solution was made by mixing in 1:1 weight proportion of a solution that contained 50% hydrogen peroxide with a solution that contained 75 weight-% formic acid, 12 weight-% sulfuric acid and 13 weight-% water. After soaking membranes were placed again to the flat sheet cell and salt rejection and flux were measured at the same conditions as before soaking.

(21) Flux and salt rejection data before and after soaking are presented in Table 1. It can be seen that for membrane soaked in performic acid the differences between flux before and after soaking are less than 15% while for other membranes (soaked in peracetic and sodium hypochlorite) the differences are bigger than 15%.

(22) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Changes in flux for membrane soaked in performic acid, peracetic acid and hypochlorite. Initial Flux after Product mg/l hour flux soaking Performic acid 14 144 86 84 84 24 98 95 Peracetic acid 7 144 86 73 18 144 91 53 35 144 86 44 Hypochlorite 20 144 93 41

(23) Results in Table 1 show that surprisingly performic acid did not damage membranes compared to the commonly used oxidizing biocides sodium hypochlorite or peracetic acid.

Example 2

(24) The impact of PFA on membrane was further studied by a laboratory scale continuous filtration experiment. The type of membrane used in the experiment was brackish water membrane (FilmTec BW30LE).

(25) The continuous filtration has been done in parallel. From a single brackish water tank the water was pumped to two parallel lines with flat sheet cells having similar brackish water membrane. In one line PFA was added continuously into feed and in other line (control) there was no PFA addition. The filtration conditions were as follows: pressure 15 bar, salt (sea salt): 2 g/l, Temperature: 20 C., flow rate: 48 l/h, PFA dosing rate: 6.5 g/h equilibrium solution having PFA active substance concentration 14 weight-% (=19.8 ppm active substance/l of brackish water). Flux and conductivity of permeate and concentrate were monitored and collected over time (for 30 days). The variation of permeate flux with time for both parallel experiments is presented in FIG. 1 and Table 2.

(26) As can been seen in FIG. 1 B where PFA was added, the changes in flux were small while for control line (without PFA) flux decreased over test period. Also, the membrane tolerated the PFA that can be seen from the salt rejection values in Table 2.

(27) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Flux and salt rejection for two parallel filtering lines. Parameter/line Control With PFA Initial permeate flux, g/h 300 250 Final permeate flux, g/h 200 250 Initial salt rejection, % 98 98 Final salt rejection, % 98 98