AN ENDOPHYTIC MAGNAPORTHIOPSIS INCRUSTANS M-B927 AND ITS APPLICATION

Abstract

The present invention discloses an endophytic fungal strain Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927 and an application thereof, and belongs to the technical filed of microbial applications. The deposit number of the endophytic fungal strain M-B927 is CCTCC M 2021503, and the scientific name thereof is Magnaporthaceae sp. The endophytic fungal strain M-B927 can enhance the resistance of rice against seedling leaf blast with a control efficiency of 73.06% and a disease index reduced by 52.22. Popularization and application of the biological control efficiency of the endophytic fungus M-B927 against seedling leaf blast in rice has great potential in the field of agriculture.

Claims

1. An endophytic fungus M-B927, wherein the deposit number thereof is CCTCC M 2021503 and the scientific name thereof is Magnaporthaceae sp.

2. A method of controlling of rice blast comprising the step of utilizing the endophytic fungus M-B927 of claim 1.

3. The method of claim 2, comprising: colonization of the endophytic fungus M-B927 in a root tissue of rice.

4. The method of claim 3, comprising: co-cultivation of germinated rice seeds and the endophytic fungus M-B927 for colonization of the fungus in roots of rice seedlings to enhance resistance of rice against seedling leaf blast at seedling stage.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the rice seeds germinate at 22-25° C. after being surface-sterilized.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the germinated seeds are transferred into a half-strength MS medium, and mycelium plugs of the endophytic fungus M-B927 were inoculated.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein conditions of co-cultivation are: cultivation at 22-25° C. for 15-20 days, under light for 16 hours and in the dark for 8 hours per day.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] FIG. 1 shows an image of the colony morphology of the endophytic fungal strain Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927.

[0021] FIG. 2 shows an optical microscope image of conidia morphology of the endophytic fungal strain Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927, where the bar is 10 μm.

[0022] FIG. 3 shows an optical microscope image of mycelia morphology of the endophytic fungal strain Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927, where the bar is 10 μm.

[0023] FIG. 4 shows a phylogenetic tree of six genes combined for 34 strains including M-B927.

[0024] FIG. 5 shows control efficiency of the endophytic fungal strain Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927 on seedling leaf blast in rice, where “A” demonstrates the disease severity of rice blast on leaves in the strain M-B927 treatment group and the control group; “B” shows a disease-scale index frequency distribution of seedling leaf blast in the strain M-B927 treatment group and the control group; and “C” demonstrates the disease index of seedling leaf blast in the strain M-B927 treatment group and the control group, the data in the charts being mean ±SD. Significance level (t-test): **P<0.01.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0025] The present invention is further described hereinafter in combination with detailed examples, but the present invention is not limited hereto. Unless otherwise specified, the technical means adopted in the examples are all regular art, and the reagents are all commercially available.

Example 1 Isolation and identification of Endophytic Fungus M-B927

[0026] I. Strain Isolation and Purification

[0027] Strain M-B927 was isolated from the root system of Oryza granulata from Yunnan Province. Firstly, the root system of the wide rice was continuously rinsed with tap water and the soil particles and appendages were carefully removed. Healthy root tissues were picked for surface sterilization, and were immersed in 75% ethanol for 1-2 min and 1% sodium hypochlorite for 4-5 min, and subsequently, the roots were rinsed with sterile deionized water three times. The root tissues were cut into 0.5 cm long segments, which were then transferred into 2% malt extract agar (MEA, OXOID, with 50 mg/L of chloramphenicol added to inhibit the growth of endophytic bacteria) plates for incubation at 25° C. in the dark. Endophytic fungal mycelia emerged from the edge of the tissue cuts on the fifth day of culture, and were carefully picked with an inoculation loop and transferred into a fresh PDA medium for purification and cultivation. The strain was recorded as M-B927.

[0028] II. Strain Identification

[0029] 1. Morphological Identification

[0030] The isolated and purified strain M-B927 was inoculated on a PDA medium and cultivated at 25° C. for 7 days. A small amount of the fungal mass was picked with an inoculation loop to prepare a slide for observation, measurement and imaging under an optical microscope. The growth status of the colony is shown in FIG. 1, the morphology of conidia is shown in FIG. 2, and the morphology of mycelia is shown in FIG. 3.

[0031] The morphological characteristics thereof are that, the colony grew fast on the PDA plate and the colony diameter reached 6 cm after growing on the PDA plate at 25° C. for 5 days; aerial mycelia were poorly developed, prostrating on medium surface, and the colony was white initially and, at a later stage, the middle of the colony turned black while the outer ring was white, the mycelia were 2-4 μm in width (mycelia); conidiophores were solitary, unbranched; conidia were elliptic, no septum, 8.0-13.0×5.0-8.0 μm.

[0032] 2. Molecular Identification

[0033] 2.1 Identification of ITS rDNA Gene of the Fungus

[0034] (1) DNA Extraction

[0035] {circle around (1)} After the culture of the strain M-B927 on the PDA plate at 25° C. for 7 days, the mycelia were collected from the plate with a tooth pick and transferred into a sterilized 1.5 mL centrifuge tube containing 300 μL extraction buffer (1 M KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH=8.0).

[0036] {circle around (2)} The fungal mass was pulverized with an electric grinder and vigorously vortexed for 2 min.

[0037] {circle around (3)} The mass was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min.

[0038] {circle around (4)} The supernatant was pipetted to a second clean centrifuge tube, and the precipitate was discarded.

[0039] {circle around (5)} Isopropanol (AR) was added to the supernatant in an equal volume, and mixed by inverting the tube gently several times, then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min to precipitate the nucleic acid.

[0040] {circle around (6)} The supernatant was discarded gently, and the centrifuge tube containing the precipitate was put on an absorbent paper upside down to drain water.

[0041] {circle around (7)} Subsequently, 300 μL 70% ethanol was added and mixed with the precipitate by inverting the tube gently several times and then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 2 min.

[0042] {circle around (8)} The supernatant was discarded gently, and step {circle around (7)} was repeated once.

[0043] {circle around (9)} The centrifuge tube was placed on an absorbent paper upside down to drain water, and placed at 37° C. for 15 min such that ethanol was fully evaporated.

[0044] {circle around (10)} The precipitate was resuspended in 50 μL ddH.sub.2O to obtain the genomic DNA of M-B927 with a concentration up to 30 ng/μL.

[0045] (2) PCR Amplification of ITS rDNA Gene of the Fungus

[0046] The PCR amplification was performed in a 50 μL reaction system containing: 2 μM each of an upstream primer and a downstream primer, 200 μM of dNTPs, 1.5 mM of MgCl.sub.2, 5 μL of 10×PCR buffer, 2 μL of template DNA, and 2 U of Taq enzyme.

[0047] The sequence of the upstream primer ITS1 was 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′ (SEQ ID No. 7), and

[0048] the sequence of the downstream primer ITS4 was 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′ (SEQ ID No. 8).

[0049] The PCR amplification reaction was carried out with a Longgene MG96G PCR cycler. The PCR cycling conditions consisted of: pre-denaturation at 94° C. for 2 min; then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94° C. for 30 seconds, annealing at 55° C. for 40 seconds and extension at 72° C. for 1 min; and a final extension at 72° C. for 10 min.

[0050] (3) Recovery and Purification of PCR Products

[0051] After the completion of the PCR reactions, the PCR products were checked by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, and then recovered and purified with the DNA gel purification kit of Axygen Biotechnology Limited, following the step-by-step procedure provided in the kit instructions, the steps being as follows.

[0052] {circle around (1)} All the 50 μL PCR products were loaded in the wells of the 1% agarose gel for electrophoresis and the gel was run at 5 V/CM for 30 min.

[0053] {circle around (2)} Following the completion of the electrophoresis, a gel slice containing the target DNA fragment was excised with a scalpel blade under ultraviolet illumination, placed in a 2 mL centrifuge tube and weighed.

[0054] {circle around (3)} Buffer DE-A was added to the 2 mL centrifuge tube in which the gel was collected based on 3 mL buffer DE-A for each 1 mg gel; the mixture was held at 75° C. for 10 min, during which time it was vortexed several times until the gel was completely melted.

[0055] {circle around (4)} Buffer DE-B of 0.5×Buffer DE-A volume was added and mixed well.

[0056] {circle around (5)} A Miniprep column was placed in the 2 mL centrifuge tube, the mixture was transferred into the Miniprep column, and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 1 min and the supernatant was discarded.

[0057] {circle around (6)} The Miniprep column was placed back into the 2 mL centrifuge tube, 500 μL of Buffer W1 was added, and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 30 seconds.

[0058] {circle around (7)} The Miniprep column was placed back into the 2 mL centrifuge tube, 700 μL of Buffer W2 was added, and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 30 seconds.

[0059] {circle around (8)} Step {circle around (7)} was repeated once.

[0060] {circle around (9)} The Miniprep column was placed back into the 2 mL centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 2 min to drain the wash buffer on the membrane.

[0061] {circle around (10)} The Miniprep column was placed back into the 2 mL centrifuge tube, 50 μL ddH.sub.2O was added, and centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 min. The eluted DNA was stored at −20° C.

[0062] (4) Gene Sequencing and Sequence Analysis

[0063] The purified and recovered target DNA fragments checked by electrophoresis were delivered to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) for sequencing with an ABIPRISMA377 automatic sequencer. After strict check of the sequencing result, a DNA fragment sequence as shown in SEQ ID No.1 with a length of 365 bp was obtained.

[0064] Homologous or similar nucleotide sequences were searched for and aligned to the obtained nucleotide sequence by BLAST in the GenBank database on the national center for biotechnology information (NCBI) website. According to the BLAST alignment, the coverage of the sequence and sequences under accession numbers KJ855515 and KJ855504 was 100%, and the identity was up to 98.36%. Both of these sequences are derived from ITS rDNA of Magnaporthaceae sp.

[0065] As demonstrated by the results of the above molecular identification and morphological identification, the strain belongs to the family Magnaporthaceae in the class Sordariomycetes in the phylum Ascomycota in the kingdom Fungi. Therefore, the strain is named as Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927.

[0066] 2.2 Identification of rDNA genes including RPB1, TEF1, SSU, MCMI and LSU derived from the fungus M-B927 for further refinement of M-B927 classification.

[0067] (1) The PCR amplification was performed in a 50 μL reaction system containing: 2 μM each of an upstream primer and a downstream primer, 200 μM of dNTPs, 1.5 mM of MgCl.sub.2, 5 μL of 10×PCR buffer, 2μL of template DNA, and 2 U of Taq enzyme. Primers are listed in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Name Annealing of temperature Name and sequence genes (° C.) of primers RPB1 Increased RPB1-Ac: from 5′-GARTGYCCDGGD 57 to 72 CAYTTYGG-3′ at a (SEQ ID No. 9) rate of RPB1- Cr: 0.2° C./s 5′-CCNGCDATNTCR TTRTCCATRTA-3′ (SEQ ID No. 10) TEF1 57 EF1-983F: 5′-GCYCCYGGHCAY CGTGAYTT-3′ (SEQ ID No. 11) EF1-2218R: 5′-ATGACACCRACR GCRACRGTYTGYAT-3′ (SEQ ID No. 12) SSU 57 NS1: 5′-GTAGTCATATGC TTGTCTC-3′ (SEQ ID No. 13) NS4: 5′-CTTCCGTCAATT CCTTTAAG-3′ (SEQ ID No. 14) MCM7 57 MCM7F: 5′-CAGGACTGCAAG GACAAC-3′ (SEQ ID No. 15) MCM7R: 5′-GGATCTTCATGC CGTCAC-3′ (SEQ ID No. 16) LSU 57 LSI: 5′-GTACCCGCTGAA CTTAAGC-3′ (SEQ ID No. 17) LR5: 5′-TCCTGAGGGAAA CTTCG-3′ (SEQ ID No. 18)

[0068] The procedures for PCR amplification and product sequencing were the same as in the section 2.1. The sequencing results were strictly checked, and the rDNA sequences of RPB1, TEF1, SSU, MCMI and LSU are as shown in SEQ ID No. 2-6.

[0069] (2) Sequence Analysis

[0070] Sequence alignment was performed on the national center for biotechnology information (NCBI) website, and the results are shown in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Name of genes ITS LSU SSU MCM7 RPB1 TEF1 Accession JF414846 JF414895 JF414870 JF710389 JF710440 JF710417 number Identity 100% 100% / 97.49% 99.49% 99.66%

[0071] Subsequently, the 34 strains including M-B927 were subjected to a phylogenetic analysis of six genes combined, and Bayesian inference trees and Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were constructed separately with a procedure as below:

[0072] {circle around (1)} writing the target sequence and the reference sequences to a txt file in the fasta format;

[0073] {circle around (2)} aligning sequences with Clustal×2.1;

[0074] {circle around (3)} correcting the alignment results manually with Genedoc, such as trimming of the head and tail, alignment, etc.

[0075] {circle around (4)} opening *.msf and selecting Export to obtain a clustal (Aln) file; opening the *.aln file with MEGA6, setting outgroup at the top, selecting Export Alignment and choosing the FASTA format to obtain a *.fas file;

[0076] {circle around (5)} opening *.fas with MEGA6, and obtaining *.NEXUS by selecting Export Alignment and choosing the PAUP format;

[0077] {circle around (6)} loading the *.fas file to be read by jModelTest 2.1.7, selecting Analysis-Computelikelihood scores, choosing Do AIC calculation to obtain the optimal model, and saving the result;

[0078] {circle around (7)} modifying the *.nex file against the specimen format, wherein modification of three sets of parameters, including dimensions ntar, nchar and outgroup, was required; additionally, setting the total number of samples to 5000000, the sampling frequency to 100, and the aging sample accounting for 25% of the total number of samples, i.e. 12500;

[0079] {circle around (8)} running MrBayes, typing exe *.nex and entering, ending the run in the event of a run result P<0.01, otherwise continuing to run, the result file being *.con;

[0080] {circle around (9)} running the software iqtree, typing \iqtree -s *.fas -m MFP -bb 1000 -bnni -redo and pressing Enter, waiting till the run ends;

[0081] {circle around (10)} opening the *.con and *.treefile files with the software FigTree. The phylogenetic tree was edited using the software AI with a Bayesian tree as the foundation, and the results are shown in FIG. 4.

[0082] As demonstrated by the results, M-B927 and Magnaporthiopsis incrustans M51 were in the same branch and had a BI posterior probability of 1 and ML Bootstrap value of 100%. M-B927 was identified by morphological identification results as belonging to Magnaporthiopsis incrustans in the family Magnaporthaceae in the class Sordariomycetes in the phylum Ascomycota in the kingdom Fungi.

[0083] The strain Magnaporthaceae sp. M-B927 was deposited on May 8, 2021 in the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC) at Wuhan University in Wuhan, China, the recognized IDA under the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure, under a deposit number of CCTCC M 2021503.

Example 2 Co-Cultivation of Strain M-B927 and Rice Roots

[0084] Test Plant: a Regular Rice Cultivar, C039, of Oryza sativa L.

[0085] 1. Culture of Strain M-B927

[0086] Strain M-B927 preserved on a filter paper sheet was inoculated on a potato dextrose agar (PDA) solid medium to be activated through culturing at 25° C. for 7 days in the dark, and then set aside.

[0087] 2. Rice seeds were peeled and placed in an Erlenmeyer flask, surface-sterilized in 1.0% sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 min, and rinsed 3 times using sterile water and set aside. The sterilized seeds were spread out evenly on a half-strength MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium, sealed with Parafilm sealing film, and placed in a plant incubator set at 25° C. (16 hours under light/8 hours in the dark). When radicles emerged from the seeds in 3 days, the seeds were transferred into tissue culture bottles containing half-strength MS medium, 10 seeds per bottle. ThreeM-B927 mycelium plugs (diameter 0.5 cm) were inoculated. Blank PDA agar blocks were used as control. 3 replications were performed. Rice seedlings were used for inoculation with the pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae when they grew to the stage of 3 leaves on main shoot and fourth appearing (15-20 days).

[0088] 3. Spray of Conidia of Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae

[0089] The pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae Guy11 was inoculated in a CM solid medium and cultured at 25° C. under light for 10-12 days. The conidia of Guy11 were collected by rinsing the medium with sterile water, then filtered through 3 layers of filter paper and prepared into a spore suspension with a concentration of 1×10.sup.5. Then a 0.4% gelatin solution was prepared and mixed with the spore suspension according to a 1:1 volume ratio such that the final concentration of the spore suspension of Magnaporthe oryzae was 5 x 10.sup.4.

[0090] The CM medium (1 L) contained: Yeast Extract (1 g), Casamino acid (1 g), D-glucose (10 g), KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 (1.52 g), NaNO.sub.3 (6 g), Peptone140 (2 g), KCl (0.52 g), MgSO.sub.4.Math.7H.sub.2O (0.52 g), 0.1% (v/v) Vitamin solution and 0.1% (v/v) Trace Element. The pH was adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH, and 15 g/L agar was added to the solid medium. The medium was autoclaved at 121° C. for 15 min for sterilization.

[0091] The leaves of rice seedlings were sprayed evenly with the spore suspension using a sprayer, 1 mL suspension per bottle. Then the tissue culture bottles were placed in a plant incubator and incubated at 25° C. in the dark for 2 days. After 2 days, light was supplemented (light 16 hours/darkness 8 hours) for a further cultivation of 4-5 days. The scales of rice leaf blast were recorded and the disease index were calculated.

[0092] As shown in FIG. 5, serious seedling leaf blast occurred in the control group, and the disease scale on leaves fell mainly between 7-9, and the disease index was 71.48; while in the strain M-B927 treatment group, the incidence of seedling leaf blast was significantly reduced, with the disease scales on most leaves fell between 0-1, and the disease index was 19.26, and compared with the control group, the disease index decreased by 52.22, the control efficiency reaching 73.06%.