Clamping Device, in Particular for Clamping a Saddle for a Cycle

Abstract

This clamping device includes a clamping collar intended to surround an element to be clamped and open so as to have two ends able to come closer to one another in order to grip the element to be clamped. This device also includes a lever, mounted tilting on the ends of the collar around a tilting axis perpendicular to a central axis of the collar, and connected to the collar by a cam system able to be actuated by tilting the lever. The cam system includes at least one pair associating a cam surface and a counter-cam surface, which are each globally helical and which are respectively connected in rotation to the collar and the lever. The cam surface of each pair includes a first surface portion, against which the counter-cam surface is pressed when the lever is in an open position and is tilted from the open position to a closed position, and a second surface portion, which is connected to the first portion and against which the counter-cam surface is pressed when the lever is in the closed position and tilted from the closed position toward the open position. The counter-cam surface includes a main part, which is helical, while being centered on the tilting axis and having a constant pitch, and which is pressed along the tilting axis against the second surface portion of the associated cam surface when the lever is in the closed position. Furthermore, the cam surface defines a bearing helix at which the bearing stresses are applied between the cam and counter-cam surfaces, this bearing helix winding around the tilting axis and extending at least partially over the first and second portions. In order to improve this clamping device, in particular for its use on rental cycles, the bearing helix of the cam surface has a helix angle that is larger on the first portion than on the second portion of the cam surface, while this second portion of the cam surface has a pitch that is substantially equal to the constant pitch of the main part of the associated counter-cam surface.

Claims

1. A clamping device, including: a clamping collar, which defines a central axis, which is intended to surround, in a substantially coaxial manner, an element to be clamped and which is open so as to have two ends able to come closer to one another in order to grip the element to be clamped, and a lever, which is mounted tilting on the ends of the clamping collar around a tilting axis extending substantially perpendicular to the central axis, and which is connected to the clamping collar by a cam system which is able to be actuated by tilting of the lever around the tilting axis between an open position, in which the clamping collar is loosened, and a closed position, in which the clamping collar is tightened; wherein the cam system includes at least one pair associating a cam surface and a counter-cam surface, which are each globally helical, winding around the tilting axis, and which are connected in rotation around the tilting axis, respectively, to one of the clamping collar and the lever and to the other of the clamping collar and the lever; wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system includes: a first surface portion against which the associated counter-cam surface is pressed along the tilting axis both when the lever is in the open position and when the lever is tilted from the open position toward the closed position, and a second surface portion, which is connected to the first surface portion by a third surface portion of the cam surface, and against which the associated counter-cam surface is pressed along the tilting axis both when the lever is in the closed position and when the lever is tilted from the closed position toward the open position; wherein the counter-cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system includes a main part, which is helical, being centered on the tilting axis and having a constant pitch, and which is pressed along the tilting axis against the second surface portion of the associated cam surface when the lever is in the closed position; wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system defines a bearing helix at which bearing stresses are applied between the cam surface and the associated counter-cam surface, said bearing helix winding around the tilting axis and extending at least partially over the first and second surface portions of the cam surface; and wherein the bearing helix of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system has a helix angle, measured relative to a plane perpendicular to the tilting axis, that is larger on the first surface portion of the cam surface than on the second portion of the cam surface, while this second portion of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system has a pitch that is substantially equal to the constant pitch of the main part of the associated counter-cam surface.

2. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is curved so as to form a peak for concentrating the bearing stresses between the cam surface and the associated counter-cam surface, said peak forming the bearing helix.

3. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system has, in section in any axial plane containing the tilting axis and intersecting the cam surface, a rectilinear profile, and wherein the bearing helix corresponds to a geometric helix, which is centered on the tilting axis and which, in section in any axial plane containing the tilting axis and intersecting the cam surface, has a radius that is equal to .Math.(rext.sup.3rint.sup.3)/(rext.sup.2rint.sup.2), where rext and rint are outer and inner radii, respectively, of the cam surface, measured in said axial plane.

4. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system has a pitch that is larger on the first surface portion of the cam surface than on the second portion of the cam surface.

5. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the bearing helix of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system has a radius, measured relative to the tilting axis, that is smaller on the first surface portion of the cam surface than on the second portion of the cam surface.

6. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the helix angle of the bearing helix of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is: greater than 13 over substantially the entire first surface portion of the cam surface, and less than 6 over substantially the entire second surface portion of the cam surface.

7. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the helix angle of the bearing helix of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is: greater than 14 over substantially the entire first surface portion of the cam surface, and less than 5 over substantially the entire second surface portion of the cam surface.

8. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the second surface portion of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is congruent with the associated counter-cam surface.

9. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system further includes a fourth surface portion that extends from the second surface portion opposite the third surface portion, being connected to the second surface portion continuously, and wherein the pitch of the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is larger on the fourth surface portion of the cam surface than on the second surface portion.

10. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam system includes two pairs whose respective cam surfaces are symmetrical to one another relative to the tilting axis.

11. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam system includes two pairs whose respective cam surfaces are respectively arranged on either side, along the tilting axis, of the two ends of the clamping collar.

12. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam system includes at least one cam part: that is distinct from the clamping collar and the lever, while being interposed, along the tilting axis, between the lever and one of the ends of the clamping collar, which, for each pair of the cam system, delimits, on a first face of the cam part, either the corresponding cam surface, or the corresponding counter-cam surface, and which, on a second face of the cam part that is opposite the first face along the tilting axis, is provided with a cylindrical surface, which is centered on a pivot axis parallel to the central axis and secant to the tilting axis, and which cooperates by shape matching with a cylindrical surface of the clamping collar such that the cam part is both connected in rotation around the tilting axis to the clamping collar and pressed along the tilting axis against the collar, while allowing pivoting travel around the pivot axis.

13. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the clamping device further comprises a journal, which traverses the two ends of the clamping collar while being centered on the tilting axis, which is connected in rotation around the tilting axis to the lever, and which is provided, in an axially opposite manner along the tilting axis, with a head and a thread to which a nut is screwed, such that the two ends of the clamping collar, the lever and the cam system are gripped, along the tilting axis, between the head and the nut, and wherein the nut includes a bearing face, which is pressed, along the tilting axis, against an indexing face of the lever, while cooperating with this indexing face so as to lock the rotation of the nut around the tilting axis relative to the latter in a plurality of indexed positions, passing the nut between two of these indexed positions being operated by axial separation between the bearing face and the indexing face.

14. The clamping device according to claim 13, wherein the bearing face cooperates with the indexing face by shape matching.

15. The clamping device according to claim 13, wherein one of the bearing face and the indexing face is provided with a plurality of concave spherical caps, which are distributed around the tilting axis while defining the plurality of indexed positions, and wherein the other of the bearing face and the indexing face is provided with at least one convex spherical cap that is selectively received in a complementary manner in one of the concave spherical caps.

16. The clamping device according to claim 13, wherein the clamping device further comprises at least one spring that is interposed, along the tilting axis, between the journal and the lever so as to press the bearing face and the indexing face against each other along the tilting axis.

17. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the clamping collar is provided to be resilient such that, even when the lever is in the open position, the clamping collar exerts a resilient stress that moves the two ends of the clamping collar away from each other.

18. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is made from a thermoplastic material.

19. The clamping device according to claim 18, wherein the cam surface of the or each pair of the cam system is made from polyacetal or PBT.

20. The clamping device according to claim 1, wherein the clamping device is provided to clamp a saddle for a cycle, the clamping collar being intended to surround a tube for receiving a seatpost.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0067] The invention will be better understood upon reading the following description, provided solely as an example and done in reference to the drawings, in which:

[0068] FIGS. 1 to 5 are schematic graphs that have been previously described, in connection with a helical cam surface having a constant pitch,

[0069] FIGS. 6 to 8 are perspective views, from different respective viewing angles, of an exploded view of a clamping device according to the invention, a lever of this device being in the closed position;

[0070] FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a cam part, shown alone, belonging to the clamping device of FIGS. 6 to 8;

[0071] FIG. 10 is an elevation view along arrow X of FIG. 9;

[0072] FIG. 11 is a perspective view of the clamping device of FIGS. 6 to 8, shown in the assembled state and while the lever of this device is in the open position;

[0073] FIG. 12 is an elevation view along arrow XII of FIG. 11;

[0074] FIG. 13 is a sectional view along line XIII-XIII of FIG. 12;

[0075] FIG. 14 is a view similar to FIG. 12, illustrating the clamping device with its lever in the closed position;

[0076] FIGS. 15 and 16 are sectional views along lines XV-XV and XVI-XVI of FIG. 14;

[0077] FIG. 17 is a sectional view along line XVII-XVII of FIG. 16;

[0078] FIG. 18 is a sectional view along line XVIII-XVIII of FIG. 17;

[0079] FIG. 19 is a schematic graph showing the evolution of the axial travel of the cam part of FIGS. 9 and 10 as a function of an angular dimension of a cam surface of this cam part;

[0080] FIG. 20 is a schematic graph showing the evolution of a radius of a peak of the aforementioned cam surface as a function of the angular dimension of the latter;

[0081] FIG. 21 is a schematic graph showing the evolution of the helix angle of the aforementioned peak as a function of the angular dimension of the aforementioned cam surface;

[0082] FIG. 22 is a schematic graph showing the evolution of the performance of the clamping by the aforementioned cam surface as a function of the angular dimension of the latter;

[0083] FIG. 23 is a schematic graph showing the evolution of the torque to be applied to the lever of the device of FIGS. 6 to 8 to clamp this device, and

[0084] FIG. 24 is a view similar to FIG. 23, showing the evolution of the torque to loosen the device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0085] FIGS. 6 to 18 show a clamping device 1 making it possible to clamp an element to be clamped 2, which is only shown in FIG. 6, and only partially and schematically, in dotted lines. As mentioned in the introductory part, the element to be clamped 2 may in particular be a tube of a frame of a cycle, in particular a frame of a cycle, inside which a seatpost, not shown, is coaxially received, in turn topped by a seat, also not shown. For all useful purposes, the reader may refer to documents WO 2012/066215 and EP 2,927,517 for additional details relative to such a frame tube receiving such a seatpost, having recalled that these aspects are not limiting with respect to the present invention.

[0086] As shown in FIGS. 6 to 8 and 11 to 18, the clamping device 1 includes a clamping collar 10 that is globally omega-shaped. The clamping collar 10 defines a central axis X10 around which the clamping collar extends while defining, inside the clamping collar, a free space, globally cylindrical and centered on the axis X10: during use, the element to be clamped 2 is placed inside the aforementioned free space such that the clamping collar substantially coaxially surrounds the element to be clamped 2, as shown schematically in FIG. 6.

[0087] The clamping collar 10 is open at a point of its periphery: the clamping collar 10 thus has two ends 11 and 12 that are separated from each other, in a direction orthoradial to the axis X10, by a slit 13. By playing on the opening-closing of the slit 13, in other words by separating/bringing together the ends 11 and 12 across from one another, subject to the deformation of the clamping collar 10, the latter more or less strongly clamps the element to be clamped 2, in particular to lock/unlock the aforementioned seatpost or a similar member received inside the element to be clamped 2.

[0088] Also as clearly shown in FIGS. 6 to 8 and 11 to 18, the clamping device 1 includes a lever 20 that commands the deformation of the clamping collar 10 by acting on the ends 11 and 12 of the latter. More specifically, the lever 20 is mounted tilting on the ends 11 and 12 around a tilting axis Y20, which extends substantially perpendicular to the central axis X10 and offset relative to this central axis, while passing through the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10. In practice, like in the example embodiment considered here, the tilting axis Y20 extends in the orthoradial direction in which the ends 11 and 12 are separated by the slit 13.

[0089] During use, the lever 20 is provided to be actuated by a user subject to the tilting of this lever around the tilting axis Y20, in opposite directions to selectively clamp and loosen the clamping collar 10. Thus, to clamp the clamping collar 10, the lever 20 is tilted from an open position, shown in FIGS. 11 to 13, to a closed position, shown in FIGS. 6 to 8 and 14 to 18. The angular travel, around the tilting axis Y20, of the lever 20 between these open and closed positions is not limiting with respect to the invention, with the understanding that it is typically less than 360, in particular less than 180, or even substantially equal to 90 in the context of use of the clamping device 1 to clamp the seat of a cycle. In the rest of the description, as well as the example embodiment considered in the figures, the angular travel of the lever 20 between these open and closed positions is considered to be equal to 90.

[0090] The embodiment of the lever 20 is not limiting inasmuch as this lever can be manipulated by hand by a user in order to tilt it around the tilting axis Y20. In particular, the geometry of the overall shape of this lever 20 is not limited to that shown in the figures, having also noted that, for illustration reasons, the lever 20 is drawn as being split into two parts in FIGS. 6 to 8, whereas it can be made in a single part, as clearly shown in FIGS. 11, 12 and 14.

[0091] In the embodiment considered in the figures, the lever 20 includes two arms 21 and 22, which extend transversely to the tilting axis X20. These arms 20, 21 and 22 are positioned on either side, in the direction of the tilting axis Y20, of the clamping collar 10, while being separated from each other enough to allow the clamping collar 10 to pass between these arms 21 and 22 during the tilting of the lever between the open and closed positions. At their end opposite the tilting axis Y20, the arms 21 and 22 come back together to form a manual gripping zone. Opposite this gripping zone, the arms 21 and 22 respectively have ends 23 and 24, which are both traversed by the tilting axis Y20 and between which the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10 are interposed.

[0092] Also as shown in FIGS. 6 to 8 and 11 to 18, the clamping device 1 further includes a cam system 30 that mechanically connects the lever 20 to the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10 and which acts in translation, along the tilting axis Y20, on the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar in order to bring them closer together/further away with respect to each other, during the tilting of the lever 20 around the tilting axis Y20 between the open and closed positions of this lever. In the example embodiment considered in the figures, the cam system 30 includes two cam parts 31 and 32, between which are interposed, along the tilting axis Y20, the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10, the cam part 31 being axially interposed between the end 11 and the end 23 of the lever 20 while the cam part 32 is axially interposed between the end 12 and the end 24 of the lever 20. Each of the cam parts 31 and 32 is traversed by the tilting axis Y20 and delimits, on its face 31A, 32A, respectively, turned toward the end 23 of the lever 20, the end 24 of the lever 20, respectively, at least one cam surface 33, 34, respectively. In the example embodiment considered in the figures, the face 31A, respectively 32A of the cam part 31, respectively 32, includes two cam surfaces 33, respectively two cam surfaces 34, that follow one another around the tilting axis Y20 and that will be described in detail later.

[0093] Opposite, along the tilting axis Y20, the face 31A, respectively 32A, of the cam part 31, respectively 32, the latter has a face 31B turned toward the end 11 of the clamping collar 10, respectively 32B turned toward the end 12 of the clamping collar 10. The faces 31B and 32B are respectively engaged with the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10, so as to connect the cam parts 31 and 32 and the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar in rotation, around the tilting axis Y20. The embodiment of this engagement is not limiting, multiple solutions being able to be considered as long as the latter simultaneously provide the rotating connection around the tilting axis Y20 between the cam parts and the ends of the clamping collar, and the transmission of the driving between the cam parts and the ends of the clamping collar when the ends of the clamping collar are brought relatively closer together and further away along the tilting axis Y20.

[0094] Thus, a first solution, not shown in the figures, consists of rigidly linking the cam parts 31 and 32, respectively to the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10, using any appropriate means, such as lugs, glue, etc. In an alternative of this first solution that is not shown, it is even possible to consider the cam parts being integral with the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar, respectively, which amounts to saying that, unlike the embodiment considered thus far, the cam parts 31 and 32 are not separate from the clamping collar and the cam surfaces 33 and 34 are delimited by material extensions of the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar.

[0095] Another solution is considered for the example embodiment considered in the figures: the face 31B, respectively 32B of the cam part 31, respectively 32, includes a cylindrical surface 35, respectively 36, that is centered on a pivot axis X35, respectively X36, that is both parallel to the central axis X10 of the clamping collar 10 and secant to the tilting axis Y20, as clearly shown in FIGS. 13 and 15. The cylindrical surface 35, respectively 36, cooperates, by shape matching, with a cylindrical surface 15, respectively 16, delimited by the end 11, respectively 12, of the clamping collar 10, such that the cam part 31, respectively 32, is connected in rotation around the tilting axis Y20 to the end 11, respectively 12, of the clamping collar 10 and is pressed along this tilting axis Y20 against this end 11, respectively 12, while allowing pivoting travel around the pivot axis X35, respectively X36, between the cam part 31 and the end 11, respectively between the cam part 32 and the end 12. In the example embodiment shown in the figures, the cylindrical surfaces 35 and 36 are convex and the cylindrical surfaces 15 and 16 are concave, with the understanding that as an alternative that is not shown, the direction of the curves of these surfaces can be reversed. In all cases, the pivoting travel allows the cam parts 31 and 32 to accommodate the change in the incline of the ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10 relative to the tilting axis Y20 when these ends 11 and 12 are brought relatively closer together/further apart, without changing the corresponding incline of the cam parts 31 and 32, as clearly shown by comparing FIGS. 13 and 15.

[0096] Returning to the description of the cam system 30, the latter also comprises counter-cam surfaces 25 and 26, which are connected in rotation, around the tilting axis Y20, to the lever 20, and which, during use, are pressed, along the tilting axis Y20, against the cam surfaces 33 and 34 of the cam parts 31 and 32. More specifically, in the example embodiment considered in the figures, two counter-cam surfaces 25 are provided on a face 23A of the end 23 of the lever 20, turned along the tilting axis Y20 toward the end 11 of the clamping collar 10, and two counter-cam surfaces 26 are provided on a face 24A of the end 24 of the lever 20, turned toward the end 12 of the clamping collar. For each of the faces 23A and 24A, the two counter-cam surfaces 25, respectively 26, are symmetrical to one another relative to the tilting axis Y20 and each extend over about 90 around the tilting axis Y20, while being separated from each other by two angular, diametrically opposite regions of the face 23A, respectively 24A, arranged withdrawn, along the tilting axis Y20, from the counter-cam surfaces 25, respectively 26. In other words, the counter-cam surfaces 25, respectively 26, are protruding, along the tilting axis Y20, with respect to the aforementioned angular regions of the face 23A, respectively 24A.

[0097] In practice, in the assembled state of the clamping device 1, the counter-cam surfaces 25 are symmetrical to the counter-cam surfaces 26 relative to a geometric plane, perpendicular to the tilting axis Y20 and containing the central axis X10: for convenience, only one of the counter-cam surfaces 25 will be described in detail below, the other counter-cam surface 25 and the counter-cam surfaces 26 being deduced by the symmetry relationships previously indicated. Thus, considering one of the counter-cam surfaces 25, this counter-cam surface is, as clearly shown in the figure, globally helical, winding around the tilting axis Y20, and includes: [0098] a main part 25.1 corresponding to a helical surface, centered on the tilting axis Y20 and having a constant pitch, i.e., a pitch whose value, which is necessarily nonzero, is constant around the tilting axis Y20, and [0099] two opposite edges 25.2 and 25.3, which are connected to each other by the main part 25.1 and which join this main part 25.1 respectively at each of the two aforementioned angular withdrawn regions, provided on the face 23A of the lever 20.

[0100] The main part 26.1 and the opposite edges 26.2 and 26.3 are also referenced for one of the counter-cam surfaces 26 in FIG. 7.

[0101] Also is clearly shown in FIGS. 6 to 8 and 11 to 18, the clamping device 1 includes a screw-nut connecting system 40 making it possible to keep the cam surfaces 33 and 34 bearing against the counter-cam surfaces 25 and 26 in all of the tilted positions of the lever 20 between its open and closed positions, inclusive. In the example embodiment considered in the figures, this screw-nut connecting system 40 includes a journal 41 and a nut 42, both centered on the tilting axis Y20. As clearly shown in FIGS. 16 to 18, in the assembled state of the clamping device 1, the journal 41 traverses the two ends 23 and 24 of the lever 20. At one of the axial ends, the journal 41 is provided with a head 43, which emerges from the end 23 of the lever 20 and which bears, along the tilting axis Y20 and in the direction of the end 11 of the clamping collar 10, against a face 23B of the end 23, opposite the face 23A of the latter. At the end of the journal 41, axially opposite its head 43, the journal 41 is provided with a thread 44 around which the nut 42 can be screwed while bearing, along the tilting axis Y20 and toward the end 12 of the clamping collar 10, against a face 24B of the end 24 of the lever 20, opposite the face 24A of this end 24. Thus, the two ends 23 and 24 of the lever 20, the two ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10 and the cam system 30 are gripped, along the tilting axis Y20, between the head 43 and the nut 42, the intensity of this gripping being directly related to the expanse of the screwing of the nut 42 on the thread 44. The arms 21 and 22 of the lever 20 have a sufficient length to allow the flexion of these arms and therefore an approach along the tilting axis Y20 of the ends 23 and 24 that is necessary to adjust the clamping device 1.

[0102] In practice, the intensity of this gripping is pre-adjusted during the installation and maintenance of the clamping device 1. In other words, the user of the clamping device 1 is not meant to change the pre-adjustment of the screw-nut connecting system 40 to his liking. In this perspective, the screw-nut connecting system 40 has optional advantageous arrangements, outlined below.

[0103] First, during the tilting of the lever 20 between its open and closed positions, the relative rotation between the journal 41 and the nut 42 is to be avoided. To that end, the journal 41 is advantageously connected in rotation, around the tilting axis Y20, to the lever 20: in the example embodiment considered in the figures, this rotational connection is provided by shape matching between a part with a square section 45 of the journal 41, located below the head 43, and a complementary housing of the end 23 of the lever 20, hollowed in the face 23B of this end 23, as clearly shown in FIG. 17. Furthermore, the nut 42 is designed to be locked in rotation, around the tilting axis Y20, relative to the end 24 of the lever 20 and a plurality of indexed positions, distributed around the tilting axis Y20: in this way, when the nut 42 occupies one of the aforementioned indexed positions, its unscrewing with respect to the journal 41 is prevented by blocking with respect to the end 24 of the lever 20, while allowing, for an installation and maintenance operator, unlocking of the nut with respect to the end 24 and thus adjusting of the screwing of the nut 42 on the thread 44. To that end, the nut 42 has, on its axial side intended to be turned toward the end 24 of the lever 20, a bearing face 42A which, during use, is pressed axially against and cooperates in an indexed manner with the face 24B of the end 24 of the lever 20. According to one advantageous embodiment, the cooperation between the faces 42A and 24B, seeking to lock the rotation of the nut 42 around the tilting axis Y20 relative to the end 24 of the lever 20, is done by shape matching: thus, in the example embodiment considered in the figures, the bearing face 42A of the nut 42 is provided with a plurality of concave spherical caps 46 which, as clearly shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, are distributed around the tilting axis Y20, while defining the aforementioned plurality of indexed positions, and which, in the assembled state of the clamping device 1, receive, in a complementary manner, one or several convex spherical caps 27 which, as clearly shown in FIGS. 6 and 18, are provided protruding on the face 24B of the end 24 of the lever 20.

[0104] Next, it is desirable to energize the clamping device 1 so that the axial bearing and bearing of the nut 42 against the end 24 of the lever 20 is blunt under all circumstances, in particular taking account of the play and drift that may appear over time within the clamping device 1, in particular due to its regular use under outdoor conditions.

[0105] To that end, a first approach consists of the clamping collar 10 being provided to be resilient such that, even when the lever 20 is in the open position, the clamping collar exerts a stress, in the tilting axis Y20, that separates the two ends 11 and 12 of the clamping collar 10 from each other. In practice, the collar is dimensioned to be resilient enough that its deformation remains resilient when the lever 20 is in the closed position. The clamping collar 10 is in particular made from a material having a good elastic strength, typically greater than 200 MPa, or even greater than 240 MPa. The clamping collar 10 can thus be made from aluminum, in particular filled with silicon and magnesium, and being made by extrusion, the clamping collar being extruded open, then machined in the stressed closed position, before being released after machining from its inner bore.

[0106] A second approach, able to be combined with the first approach, consists of providing that the element to be clamped 2 is slotted and opened in order to pre-stress the clamping collar 10 to be open. In particular, in the usage context previously mentioned in connection with a cycle, the tube of the frame of this cycle, around which the clamping device 1 is provided to be installed, can thus be provided to be open by a longitudinal slit, then radially expanded, for example using a conical mandrel, which also facilitates the sliding of the seatpost inside this tube.

[0107] A third approach, which can be combined with one and/or the other of the two aforementioned approaches, consists of inserting, along the tilting axis Y20, one or several springs between the screw-nut connecting system 40 and the rest of the clamping device 1. In the example embodiment considered in the figures, such springs, referenced 50, are thus attached, while being inserted axially between the head 43 of the journal 41 and the end 23 of the lever 20, as clearly shown in FIGS. 6 to 8, 17 and 18. As a non-limiting example, these springs 50 can provide an axial force of about 20 N. Thus, if the energization resulting from the clamping collar 10 becomes insufficient when the lever 20 is in the open position, which may happen, for example, when the clamping of the collar is done over a very large travel and/or when the collar does not have a sufficient pre-stress travel in light of this clamping travel, it is the springs 50 that essentially, or even exclusively, provide the energization of the indexing of the clamping device, by pulling the journal 41 through the lever 20 to firmly press the bearing face 42A of the nut 42 against the face 24B of the end 24 of the lever 20. In other words, under all circumstances, in particular despite any lack of resilient travel of the clamping collar 10, the springs 50 effectively activate the anti-misadjustment function described above.

[0108] Lastly, although the user of the clamping device 1 must be dissuaded from changing the adjustment of the screw-nut connecting system 40, it is preferable for the initial adjustment and subsequent maintenance adjustments to remain easy for an operator to perform. In this perspective, according to one optional arrangement, the nut 42 has arrangements, in particular shape arrangements, seeking to ensure that its rotation around the tilting axis Y20 preferably requires the use of a specific tool, for example a key provided with lugs arranged in a manner complementary to a cavity provided on a face 42B of the nut 42, opposite its face 42A. Furthermore, the setting in rotation of the nut 42 by the operator must be done so as to overcome the resistance opposed by the cooperation between the face 42A of this nut and the face 24B of the end 24 of the lever 20. It is understood that, in the case where the clamping device 1 is energized as explained above, the torque applied by the operator to the nut 42 must be high enough to overcome the resilience of the clamping collar 10 and/or the resilience of the element to be clamped 2 and/or the resilience of the springs 50 or similar attached springs. Likewise, in the case, outlined above, where the faces 42A and 24B cooperate with each other, in particular by shape matching, to lock the nut 42 relative to the lever 20 in a plurality of indexed positions around the tilting axis Y20, the faces 42A and 24B must be axially separated from each other to allow the nut to pass between two of these indexed positions: in the case where the cooperation between the faces 42A and 24B is done by the caps 46 and 27 described above, the tangency angle of these caps is advantageously provided to be smaller than 45, such that the contact between the caps 46 and the caps 27 is reversible, such that, when the operator exerts a torque on the nut, an axial force is generated directly by the caps to separate the nut 42 from the end 24 of the lever 20. Of course, for other embodiments of the indexed cooperation between the faces 42A and 24B, the mere application of a torque to the nut 42 by the operator can prove insufficient to allow the nut to be set in rotation, the operator than having to perform an additional manipulation seeking to separate the faces 42A and 24B from each other axially, if applicable using a specific tool. In all cases, the angular indexing between the faces 42A and 24B allows the operator to count and quickly assess the number of indexing notches, necessary for the pre-adjustment or readjustment of the clamping device 1.

[0109] The different components of the clamping device 1 having been at least partially described thus far, below we will return to the detailed description of the faces 31A and 32A of the cam parts 31 and 32, in particular the cam surfaces 33 and 34 of these faces 31A and 32A. For convenience, this detailed description will be in connection with only one of the cam surfaces 33, the corresponding characteristics in connection with the other cam surface 33 and the two cam surfaces 34 being able to be deduced by the symmetry relationships: indeed, in the example embodiment considered in the figures, the two cam surfaces 33, respectively the two cam surfaces 34, are symmetrical to one another relative to the tilting axis Y20; furthermore, relative to a geometric plane, perpendicular to the tilting axis Y20 and containing the central axis X10, the cam surfaces 33 are symmetrical to the cam surfaces 34.

[0110] Thus, considering one of the cam surfaces 33, this cam surface is, as clearly shown in FIGS. 6 to 9, globally helical, winding around the tilting axis Y20. Furthermore, as clearly shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, this cam surface 33 successively includes: [0111] a surface portion 33.0, which, compared to the rest of the cam surface 33, is the most withdrawn on the face 31A, and which extends around the tilting axis Y20, between its angular end opposite the rest of the cam surface 33 and its angular end connecting the surface portion 33.0 to the rest of the cam surface 33, over an angle denoted 0 in FIG. 10, this angle 0 for example being equal to about 75; [0112] a surface portion 33.1, which extends around the tilting axis Y20, between its angular end connecting it continuously to the surface portion 33.0 and its opposite end, over an angle denoted 1, for example equal to about 20; [0113] a surface portion 33.3, which extends around the tilting axis Y20, between its angular end connecting it continuously to the surface portion 33.1 and its opposite end, over an angle denoted 3, for example equal to about 15; [0114] a surface portion 33.2, which extends around the tilting axis Y20, between its angular end connecting it continuously to the surface portion 33.3 and its opposite angular end, over an angle denoted 2, for example equal to about 55; and [0115] a surface portion 33.4, which extends around the tilting axis Y20, between its angular end connecting it continuously to the surface portion 33.2 and its opposite angular end, over an angle denoted 4, for example equal to about 15.

[0116] Furthermore, at the angular end of the surface portion 33.0, opposite the surface portion 33.1, this cam surface 33 is bordered by a springback 37 protruding from this angular end, in particular along the tilting axis Y20. In the example embodiment considered in the figures, the two cam surfaces 33 each extend over 180 around the tilting axis, such that the surface portion 33.4 of each of the cam surfaces 33 emerges, at its angular end opposite the surface portion 33.2, over the springback 37 associated with the other cam surface, as clearly shown in FIGS. 9 and 10.

[0117] In the assembled state of the clamping device 1, the counter-cam surface 25, associated with the cam surface 33 outlined above and thus forming, with the latter, a cam surface/counter-cam surface pair, is supported on one of the surface portions 33.1 to 33.4 as a function of the tilted position of the lever 20 around the tilting axis Y20. More specifically, as clearly visible in FIGS. 12 and 13, when the lever 20 is in the open position, the counter-cam surface 25, more specifically the edge 25.2 of the latter, is supported, along the tilting axis Y20, against the surface portion 33.1: the contact between the edge 25.2 of the counter-cam surface 25 and the surface portion 33.1 can, if applicable, be limited to a quasi-periodic angular expanse zone, whereas, at the same time, the opposite edge 25.3 of the counter-cam surface 25 is abutting, in a direction peripheral to the tilting axis Y20, against the springback 37 associated with the cam surface 33. As clearly visible in FIGS. 14 and 15, when the lever 20 is in the closed position, the counter-cam surface 25, in particular the main part 25.1 of the latter, is supported, along the tilting axis Y20, against the surface portion 33.2. It is understood that, when the lever 20 goes from the open position to the closed position, the counter-cam surface 25 is pressed, along the tilting axis Y20, successively against the surface portion 33.1, the surface portion 33.3 and the surface portion 33.2. Likewise, when the lever 20 goes from the closed position to the open position, the counter-cam surface 25 is pressed, along the tilting axis Y20, successively against the surface portion 33.2, the surface portion 33.3 and the surface portion 33.2. Furthermore, it is understood that when the lever 20 tends to be tilted past its closed position, i.e., from its closed position toward a position that would move it further away from its open position, the counter-cam surface 25, in particular the edge 25.2 of the latter, bears, along the tilting axis Y20, against the surface portion 33.4.

[0118] FIG. 19 allows clear viewing of the selective bearing of the counter-cam surface 25 against the surface portions 33.1 to 33.4 and against the springback 37, as a function of the position of the lever 20: in this FIG. 19, based on the angular dimension of the cam surface 33, identified by the angles 0 to 4 defined above, the axial travel, i.e., the travel along the tilting axis Y20, of the cam part 31 at its cam surface 33 is drawn, associating it with three profiles, shown in dotted lines, of the counter-cam surface 25: the leftmost profile in FIG. 19 corresponds to the open position of the lever 20 and the rightmost profile corresponds to the closed position of this lever, while the middle profile corresponds to an intermediate position of the lever between the open and closed positions. The angular travel of the lever 20 between the open and closed positions, which corresponds to the angular deviation between the leftmost profile and the rightmost profile, can thus be equal to about 90, as mentioned above in the context of the use of the clamping device 1 to clamp the seat of a cycle.

[0119] FIG. 19 also makes it possible to see that the surface portions 33.1 to 33.4 are not found, in the graph of this FIG. 19, in the form of aligned respective slopes. On the contrary, at the surface portion 33.1, i.e., between the angular dimensions 0 and 0+1, the graph of FIG. 19 shows a steeper slope than at the surface portion 33.2, i.e., between the angular dimensions 0+1+3 and 0+1+3+2. Thus, the pitch of the cam surface 33 is larger over the surface portion 33.1 than over the surface portion 33.2, having noted that the interest of this arrangement will appear a bit later. The variation of the pitch between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2 is accommodated continuously by the surface portion 33.3, which thus provides a gradual transition, as clearly shown in FIG. 19. It is understood that, alternatively, the surface portion 33.3 can have a smaller angular expanse than in the example of the figures, or even have a quasi-periodic angular expanse, as long as this surface portion 33.3 physically provides the transition, if applicable geometrically discontinuous, between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2.

[0120] As illustrated by FIG. 19, the pitch of the surface portion 33.2 is provided to be substantially equal to the pitch of the main part 25.1 of the cam surface 25. In practice, the respective pitches of the surface portion 33.2 and the main part 25.1 of the cam surface 25 are equal, to within functional play. More globally, the surface portion 33.2 can advantageously be provided to be congruent with the counter-cam surface 25: this way, when the lever 25 is in the closed position, the contact interface between the cam surface 33 and the counter-cam surface 25 is very extended, substantially corresponding to the entire surface portion 33.2, which distributes, over the latter, the bearing stresses between the cam surface 33 and the counter-cam surface 25. The creep of the material making up the cam surface 33 is thus avoided, which advantageously makes it possible to consider manufacturing the cam surface 33 with a creep-sensitive material, in particular a thermoplastic material, such as polyacetal or PBT (polybutylene terephthalate). The interest of using such a material to produce the cam surface 33 and, more generally, to produce the entire corresponding cam part 31, is that this material is simultaneously cost-effective, in particular in that this material can be injected in a mold for shaping the surface of the cam 33, wear-resistant, and with a low friction coefficient.

[0121] At the same time, the fact that there is no congruence between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.3 and the counter-cam surface 25 means that, during the passage of the lever 20 between the open and closed positions, the bearing of the counter-cam surface 25 against the surface portions 33.1 and 33.3 causes a high contact pressure: however, this does not cause creep of the material making up the cam surface 33, since this contact pressure is only established for a very short period of time, during the transition between the open and closed positions. Furthermore, when the lever goes from the open position to the closed position and the lever is about to reach the closed position, the contact interface between the cam surface and the counter-cam surface does not stop increasing, reaching a maximum at the end of clamping whereas, at the same time, the clamping force increases practically linearly up to its maximum in the closed position.

[0122] FIG. 19 further makes it possible to understand that the surface portion 33.0 of the cam surface 33 has no functional interest, in that this surface portion 33.0 does not need to establish pressing contact with the counter-cam surface 25. In particular, when the lever 20 is open, the counter-cam surface 25 cooperates by bearing with the surface portion 33.1 and the springback 37, as explained above, while being able to remain at a distance from the surface portion 33.0, in particular by providing sufficient play between them, as illustrated in FIG. 19. Of course, as an alternative that is not shown, the surface portion 33.0 can have a smaller, or even nonexistent, expanse subject to an increased expanse for the surface portion 33.1.

[0123] Returning to the description of the cam surface 33 shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, it will be noted that this cam surface 33 is curved so as to form a peak 33A that, as clearly shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, winds around the tilting axis Y20, while extending at least over the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2 of the cam surface 33. In the example embodiment considered here, the peak 33A extends continuously over the surface portions 33.1, 33.2 and 33.3, while extending even over the surface portions 33.0 and 33.4. This being said, as an alternative that is not shown, the peak 33A can extend discontinuously over these surface portions, if applicable only running over part of only one or several of these surface portions. In all cases, the peak 33A corresponds, in any cutting plane containing the tilting axis Y20, to the point protruding most from the cam surface 33, in other words the apex of the curved profile of the cam surface. In practice, this curved profile of the cam surface 33 has a very large curve radius. During use, i.e., when the surface of the counter-cam 25 is pressed against the cam surface 33, the corresponding bearing stresses are concentrated at the peak 33A.

[0124] This concentration of the stresses at the peak 33A can be taken advantage of to improve the behavior of the cam system 30. To do this, according to one arrangement whose interest will appear a bit later, the radius, i.e., the distance radially to the tilting axis Y20, of the peak 33A is not constant around this axis, but varies as a function of the angular dimension of the cam surface 33, as clearly shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 and as illustrated in FIG. 20, which shows this evolution of the radius of the peak 33A. Thus, the radius of the peak 33A is smaller on the surface portion 33.1 of the surface of the cam 33, i.e., between the angular dimensions 0 and 0+1, than on the surface portion 33.2, i.e., between the angular dimensions 0+1+3 and 0+1+3+2. The difference in radius between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2 is accommodated by the surface portion 33.3, on which the radius of the peak varies continuously to perform the transition between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2. In practice, within each of the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2, the radius of the peak 33A cannot be strictly constant, but may, like in the example shown in the figures, vary, having noted that, for reasons that will appear a bit later, the value of the radius is advantageously minimal in the region of the surface portion 33.1, opposite the surface portion 33.2, and the value of the radius is advantageously maximum in the region of the surface portion 33.2, opposite the surface portion 33.1.

[0125] Simultaneously taking account of the arrangement mentioned above, in which the pitch of the cam surface 33 is larger on the surface portion 33.1 than on the surface portion 33.2, and the other arrangement mentioned above, in which the radius of the peak 33A is smaller on the surface portion 33.1 than on the surface portion 33.2, it is understood that the peak 33A has a helix angle .sub.33A that, without changing signs, evolves significantly based on the angular dimension of the cam surface 33, having recalled that this helix angle, which is measured relative to a plane perpendicular to the tilting axis Y20, satisfies the relationship (1) given in the introduction. FIG. 21 makes it possible to view this variation of the helix angle .sub.33A. In particular, the helix angle .sub.33A, which is positive over the entire functional expanse of the cam surface 33, is larger on the surface portion 33.1, i.e., between the angular dimensions 0 and 0+1, than on the surface portion 33.2, i.e., between the angular dimensions 0+1+3 and 0+1+3+2. Of course, on each of the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2, the value of the helix angle .sub.33A may not be constant, but may vary, as shown in FIG. 21: advantageously, on the surface portion 33.1, the helix angle .sub.33A is maximal in the region of the latter opposite surface portion 33.2; on the surface portion 33.2, the helix angle .sub.33A is minimal in the region of the latter opposite surface portion 33.1. Between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.3, the surface portion 33.2 accommodates the variation of the helix angle .sub.33A.

[0126] More generally, as illustrated by FIG. 21, the value of the helix angle .sub.33A on the surface portion 33.1 and the value of the helix angle .sub.33A on the surface portion 33.2 are respectively provided to be greater and less than an angle region, which is crosshatched in FIG. 21 and on either side of which the pairing between the cam surface 33 and the counter-cam surface 25 does not have the same stability, in that, above this region, this behavior is unstable, in other words reversible, while below this region, this behavior is stable, in other words irreversible. This stability aspect should be compared to FIG. 2, shown at the beginning of this document, in that the aforementioned region corresponds to , i.e., the arc tangent of the friction coefficient for the pair of materials making up the cam surface 33 and the counter-cam surface 25, considering that this friction coefficient belongs to a given value range, the expanse of which explains the expanse on the y-axis of the aforementioned angle region. As an example, when the cam surface 33 is made from polyacetal and the lever is made from polyamide filled with glass fibers, the friction coefficient of this pair of materials can be considered to be comprised between 0.1 and 0.23, such that is comprised between about 6 and 13. In the extension of this example, it is understood that the helix angle .sub.33A is advantageously provided to be greater than 13, or even 14 over the entire surface portion 33.1, and provided to be less than 6, or even 5 over the entire surface portion 33.2.

[0127] Taking the foregoing explanations into account, as well as explanations given in connection with FIG. 2, it is understood that: [0128] when the lever 20 is in the open position and tends, under the effect of its own weight, to tilt toward the closed position, the reversibility of the bearing between the counter-cam surface 25 and the surface portion keeps the lever 20 in the open position, having noted that, advantageously, the energization, outlined above, of the clamping device 1 tends to force the lever 20 to remain as open as possible, i.e., as illustrated by the leftmost profile of lever in FIG. 19; and [0129] when the lever 20 is in the closed position, the bearing between the counter-cam surface 25 and the surface portion 33.2 of the cam surface 33 is irreversible, which stabilizes the lever 20 in the closed position, preventing any untimely tilting of the lever 20 toward its open position when the user is not applying a strong enough torque to overcome the irreversibility of this bearing.

[0130] The evolution of the helix angle .sub.33A is also beneficial for the performance of the clamping by the cam surface 33, as illustrated by FIG. 22, having recalled that the clamping performance was previously defined by relationship (5). In particular, FIG. 22 shows that when the lever 20 goes from the open position to the closed position, the clamping performance is very good, compared to that when the lever is in the closed position. It is in this transitional phase that the high pitch of the surface portion 33.1 makes it possible to significantly increase the clamping travel, without increasing the maximum clamping torque as mentioned below.

[0131] Likewise, the clamping torque and the loosening torque, which the user must apply to the lever 20 to close it and open it, are favorably affected by the conformation, outlined thus far, of the cam surface 33.

[0132] FIG. 23, which shows the evolution of the clamping torque, in connection with relationship (4) given above, as a function of the angular position of the lever identified by the angular dimensions 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 outlined above, makes it possible to observe that the force to be applied by the user is significant only during the initiation of the clamping, i.e., when the lever 20 leaves its open position toward its closed position, while next increasing to a much smaller extent, until reaching a maximum value. Compared to the clamping torque to be applied to a helical cam surface with a constant pitch and with the inner and outer perimeters with constant respective radii, the evolution of which is shown in dotted lines in FIG. 23 and which is strictly linear between the open and closed positions of the lever, the aforementioned maximum value is lower than the force that the user must produce to reach the closed position. FIG. 23 also shows that, beyond the closed position, the cam surface 33 causes an abrupt increase in the clamping torque, which is related to the presence of the surface portion 33.4: owing to this surface portion 33.4, the user clearly feels that he has tilted the lever 20 to the closed position, without it being necessary to tilt the lever further.

[0133] FIG. 24 illustrates the evolution of the loosening torque, in connection with relationship (7) given above. FIG. 24 makes it possible to see that the torque to be applied by the user, which is negative when the lever 20 leaves its closed position toward its open position, becomes positive when the lever is close to reaching its open position: in other words, once the user has moved the lever 20 far enough away from its closed position toward its open position, the lever tilts reversibly, automatically, to its open position, which provides a clear indication to the user that this open position has thus been reached. Furthermore, compared to the loosening torque for a helical cam surface with a constant pitch and with inner and outer perimeters with constant respective radii, the evolution of which is shown in dotted lines in FIG. 24, the cam surface 33 makes it possible to have greater stability upon initiation of the loosening, in that upon initiation of the loosening, the loosening torque to be applied to the cam surface 33 is much more negative than that for a helical cam surface with a constant pitch and with inner and outer perimeters having constant respective radii.

[0134] Based on the considerations developed thus far, it is understood that varying the helix angle .sub.33A of the peak 33A, in order for this helix angle to be larger at the surface portion 33.1 than at the surface portion 33.2, has substantial and many interests for the clamping device 1. As explained above, in the example embodiment considered in the figures, the variation of the helix angle .sub.33A is related in part to the variation of the pitch between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2, and for another part, to the variation of the radius of the peak 33A, in connection with relationship (1) given above. Of course, rather than playing with both the pitch and the radius of the peak, it is possible, in the alternative, to play with only one or the other of these two arrangements. In other words, one alternative consists of each cam surface having a constant pitch, but being provided with a peak having a variable radius, such as the peak 33A for the cam surfaces 33. Another alternative consists of each cam surface being provided with a peak having a constant radius, while having a variable pitch between its portions corresponding to the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2 as described in the figures.

[0135] Still another possibility for alternatives concerns the peak 33A itself. Indeed, such a peak may not be provided on the cam surfaces 33: in this case, the profile, in section in any axial plane containing the tilting axis Y20, of each cam surface is rectilinear. The variation of the helix angle no longer being able to be assessed along a peak similar to the peak 33A, this variation is assessed, for each cam surface, along a geometric helix, which is centered on the tilting axis Y20 and which, in section in any axial plane containing the tilting axis Y20, has a radius satisfying relationship (2) given above, i.e., an equivalent radius req equal to .Math.(rext.sup.3rint.sup.3)/(rext.sup.2rint.sup.2), where rext and rint are outer and inner radii, respectively, of the cam surface, measured in the aforementioned axial plane. There is cause to understand that this geometric helix is functionally similar to the peak 33A considered for the example examined in the figures, in that both the peak 33A, and this geometric helix in the absence of a peak, constitute a bearing helix, which winds around the tilting axis Y20, while extending at least partially over the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2 of the cam surface 33, and at which level the bearing stresses are applied between the cam surface 33 and the associated counter-cam surface 25. Of course, in the alternative considered here, where each cam surface has no peak, but defines the aforementioned geometric helix, the variation of the helix angle of this geometric helix results either from the variation of the pitch between the surface portions 33.1 and 33.2 of the cam surface, or from an appropriate variation of the outer radius and/or the inner radius of the cam surface, or from the combination of these two arrangements respectively relative to the pitch and the inner and outer radii of the cam surface.

[0136] Various arrangements and alternatives to the clamping device 1 described thus far may also be considered: [0137] the arrangement of the cam surfaces 33 and 34 and counter-cam surfaces 25 and 26 on, respectively, the cam parts 31 and 32 and the ends 23 and 24 of the lever 20 can be reversed; [0138] rather than providing two cam surfaces 33, respectively 34, for each of the cam parts 31 and 32, only one cam surface can be provided, then being associated with a single counter-cam surface; [0139] rather than providing two, only one cam part 31 or 32 can be provided; and/or [0140] rather than using deformation, the clamping collar 10 can be provided articulated to make it possible to bring its ends 11 and 12 relatively closer/further apart.