Synbiotic mixture

Abstract

This invention relates to a preparation comprising a probiotic bacterial strain and a prebiotic mixture comprising 5-70 wt % of at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Ga1NAc1-3Ga11-4G1c, Ga11-6Ga1Nac1-3Ga11-4G1c and combinations thereof, 20-95 wt % of at least one neutral oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Gal1-6Gal, Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof and 2-50 wt % of at least one sialylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of NeuAc2-3Gal1-4Glc, NeuAc2-6Ga11-4G1c and combinations thereof. The invention extends to food products comprising said preparation and to the use of the preparation in the prevention and treatment of infections.

Claims

1. A method for treatment of an immune condition comprising the step of administering to an individual having the immune condition a composition comprising a probiotic bacterial strain and a prebiotic mixture comprising a) 5-70 wt % of at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Galactose(Gal)-N-acetyl(NAc)1-3Gal1-4Glucose(Glc), Gal1-6GalNac1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof, b) 20-90 wt % of at least one neutral oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Gal1-6Gal, Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof and c) 5-50 wt % of at least one sialylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Neuraminic acid(Neu)Ac2-3Gal1-4Glc, NeuAc2-6Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the oligosaccharide mixture comprises 10-70 wt % of the at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide, 20-80 wt % of the at least one neutral oligosaccharide and 10-50 wt % of the at least one sialylated oligosaccharide.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the prebiotic mixture comprises 15-40 wt % of the at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide, 40-60 wt % of the at least one neutral oligosaccharide and 15-30 wt % of the at least one sialylated oligosaccharide.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the immune condition is selected from the group consisting of food hypersensitivity, eczema, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and combinations thereof.

5. A method for treatment of an infection of the upper respiratory tract comprising the step of administering to an individual having the infection of the upper respiratory tract a composition comprising a probiotic bacterial strain and a prebiotic mixture comprising a) 5-70 wt % of at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of GalNAc1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6GalNac1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof, b) 20-90 wt % of at least one neutral oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Gal1-6Gal, Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof and c) 5-50 wt % of at least one sialylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of NeuAc2-3Gal1-4Glc, NeuAc2-6Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the oligosaccharide mixture comprises 10-70 wt % of the at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide, 20-80 wt % of the at least one neutral oligosaccharide and 10-50 wt % of the at least one sialylated oligosaccharide.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the prebiotic mixture comprises 15-40 wt % of the at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide, 40-60 wt % of the at least one neutral oligosaccharide and 15-30 wt % of the at least one sialylated oligosaccharide.

8. The method of claim 5, wherein the infection of the upper respiratory tract is otitis media.

9. A method for establishing a bifidogenic intestinal microbiota and/or increasing the metabolic activity of such bifidogenic intestinal microbiota comprising the steps of administering to an individual in need thereof a composition comprising a probiotic bacterial strain and a prebiotic mixture comprising a) 5-70 wt % of at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of GalNAc1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6GalNac1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof, b) 20-90 wt % of at least one neutral oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Gal1-6Gal, Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof and c) 5-50 wt % of at least one sialylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of NeuAc2-3Gal1-4Glc, NeuAc2-6Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the individual is an infant.

11. A method for treatment of a pathogenic infection of the gastro-intestinal tract comprising the step of administering to an individual having the pathogenic infection of the gastro-intestinal tract a composition comprising a probiotic bacterial strain and a prebiotic mixture comprising a) 5-70 wt % of at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of GalNAc1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6GalNac1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof, b) 20-90 wt % of at least one neutral oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of Gal1-6Gal, Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-6Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-6Gal1-4Glc, Gal1-3Gal1-3Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof and c) 5-50 wt % of at least one sialylated oligosaccharide selected from the group consisting of NeuAc2-3Gal1-4Glc, NeuAc2-6Gal1-4Glc and combinations thereof.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the pathogenic infection is caused by at least one pathogen selected from the group consisting of Staphylococci and Clostridium perfringens.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the prebiotic mixture comprises 15-40 wt % of the at least one N-acetylated oligosaccharide, 40-60 wt % of the at least one neutral oligosaccharide and 15-30 wt % of the at least one sialylated oligosaccharide.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the probiotic bacterial strain is a Lactobacillus strain.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the Lactobacillus strain is selected from the group consisting of a Lactobacillus rhamnosus, a Lactobacillus paracasei and a Lactobacillus reuteri.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the Lactobacillus strain is Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein the Lactobacillus strain is Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the probiotic bacterial strain is a Bifidobacterium strain.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the Bifidobacterium strain is selected from the group consisting of a Bifidobacterium lactis, a Bifidobacterium longum and a Bifidobacterium breve.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the Bifidobacterium strain is Bifidobacterium longum ATCC BAA-999.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows the protective effect of the preparation of the invention against toxin A from Clostridium difficile compared with the protective effect given by the components of the preparation alone (cfu=colony forming units: OS=oligosaccharides: SEM=standard error of the mean);

(2) FIG. 2 shows the protective effect against toxin A from Clostridium difficile conferred by the probiotic bacterial strains used in FIG. 1 in combination with various different prebiotics known in the art (cfu=colony forming units: GOS=galactooligosaccharides: FOS=fructooligosaccharides: 3SL=3sialyl-lactose: SEM=standard error of the mean);

(3) FIG. 3 compares the Bifidobacterium breve counts in the small intestine of gnotobiotic mice gavaged with a human infant microbiota and fed the preparation of the invention with the Bifidobacterium breve counts in mice fed the components of the preparation alone (cfu=colony forming units: CMOS=cow's milk oligosaccharides; GOS=galactooligosaccharides);

(4) FIG. 4 compares the Staphylococci counts in the faeces of gnotobiotic mice gavaged with a human infant microbiota and fed the preparation of the invention with the Staphylococci counts in mice fed the components of the preparation alone (cfu=colony forming units: CMOS=cow's milk oligosaccharides: GOS=galactooligosaccharides);

(5) FIG. 5 compares the Clostridium perfringens counts in the small intestine of gnotobiotic mice gavaged with a human infant microbiota and fed the preparation of the invention with the Clostridium perfringens counts in such mice fed the components of the preparation alone (cfu=colony forming units: CMOS=cow's milk oligosaccharides; GOS=galactooligosaccharides); and

(6) FIG. 6 compares the relative metabolic activity of resident Bifidobacterium longum over a period of two weeks in germ-free mice gavaged with a human infant microbiota and fed the preparation of the invention with the relative metabolic activity of resident Bifidobacterium longum in such mice fed the components of the preparation alone.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(7) In the present specification, the following words are given a definition that must be taken into account when reading and interpreting the description, examples and claims:

(8) bifidogenic intestinal microbiota means for infants an intestinal microbiota which is dominated by Bifidobacteria such as Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Bifidobacterium longum to the exclusion of appreciable populations of such species as Bacteroides, Clostridia and Streptococci and which is generally comparable with that found in breast fed infants;

(9) infant means a child under the age of 12 months;

(10) infant formula means a foodstuff intended for the complete nutrition of infants during

(11) the first four to six months of life and as a complement to other foodstuffs up to the age of 12 months;

(12) N-acetylated oligosaccharide means an oligosaccharide having an N-acetyl residue;

(13) NCC designates Nestle Culture Collection

(14) neutral oligosaccharide means an oligosaccharide having no charge and no N-acetyl residue;

(15) probiotic bacteria means microbial cell preparations or components of microbial cells with a beneficial effect on the health or well-being of the host. (Salminen S, Ouwehand A. Benno Y. et al Probiotics: how should they be defined Trend Food Sci. Technol. 1999:10 107-10);

(16) prebiotic means a non-digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon and thus improves host health. (Gibson and Roberfroid Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics J. Nutr 125:1401-1412);

(17) oligosaccharide means a carbohydrate having a degree of polymerisation (DP) ranging from 2 to 20 inclusive but not including lactose; and

(18) sialylated oligosaccharide means an oligosaccharide having a sialic acid residue with associated charge

(19) Preferably the prebiotic mixture comprises 10-70 wt % of the N-acetylated oligosaccharides, 20-80 wt % of the neutral oligosaccharides and 10-50 wt % of the sialylated oligosaccharides. More preferably the prebiotic mixture comprises 15-40 wt % of the N-acetylated oligosaccharides, 40-60 wt % of the neutral oligosaccharides and 15-30 wt % of the sialylated oligosaccharides. A particularly preferred prebiotic mixture comprises 30 wt % of the N-acetylated oligosaccharides, 50 wt % of the neutral oligosaccharides and 20 wt % of the sialylated oligosaccharides.

(20) Alternatively, the mixture may conveniently comprise 5-20 wt % of the specified N-acetylated oligosaccharide(s), 60-95 wt % of the specified neutral oligosaccharide(s) and 2-30 wt % of the specified sialylated oligosaccharide(s).

(21) The prebiotic mixture of the invention may be prepared from one or more animal milks. The milk may be obtained from any mammal, in particular from cows, goats, buffaloes, horses, elephants, camels or sheep.

(22) Alternatively the prebiotic mixture may be prepared by purchasing and mixing the individual components. For example, synthesised galacto-oligosaccharides such as Ga11,6Ga11,4G1c Ga11,6Gal1,6G1c, Ga11,3Ga11,4G1c, Ga11,6Ga11,6Ga11,4G1c, Gal1,6Ga11,3Ga11,4G1c and Gal1,3Gal1,6Gal1,4G1c and mixtures thereof are commercially available under the trade marks Vivinal and Elix'or. Other suppliers of oligosaccharides are Dextra Laboratories, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH and Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. Alternatively, specific glycosyltransferases, such as galactosyltransferases may be used to produce neutral oligosaccharides.

(23) The N-acetylated oligosaccharides may be prepared by the action of glucosaminidase and/or galactosaminidase on N-acetyl-glucose and/or N-acetyl galactose. Equally, N-acetyl-galactosyl transferases and/or N-acetyl-glycosyl transferases may be used for this purpose. The N-acetylated oligosaccharides may also be produced by fermentation technology using respective enzymes (recombinant or natural) and/or microbial fermentation. In the latter case the microbes may either express their natural enzymes and substrates or may be engineered to produce respective substrates and enzymes. Single microbial cultures or mixed cultures may be used. N-acetylated oligosaccharide formation can be initiated by acceptor substrates starting from any degree of polymerisation (DP) from DP=1 onwards. Another option is the chemical conversion of keto-hexoses (e.g. fructose) either free or bound to an oligosaccharide (e.g. lactulose) into N-acetylhexosamine or an N-acetylhexosamine containing oligosaccharide as described in Wrodnigg, T. M.; Stutz, A. E. (1999) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38:827-828.

(24) The sialylated oligosaccharides 3sialyl-lactose and 6sialyl-lactose may be isolated by chromatographic or filtration technology from a natural source such as animal milks. Alternatively, they may also be produced by biotechnology using specific sialyltransferases either by enzyme based fermentation technology (recombinant or natural enzymes) or by microbial fermentation technology. In the latter case microbes may either express their natural enzymes and substrates or may be engineered to produce respective substrates and enzymes. Single microbial cultures or mixed cultures may be used. Sialyl-oligosaccharide formation can be initiated by acceptor substrates starting from any degree of polymerisation (DP) from DP=1 onwards.

(25) The bacterial strain may be selected from any strain which satisfies the definition of a probiotic and has acceptable shelf-life for the product into which the preparation of the invention is to be incorporated. For example, infant formulae are required to remain stable and effective for up to 36 months. Of course, the preparation of the invention does not need to be incorporated into another product such as a food stuff but may be ingested as is or mixed with a suitable excipient in the form of a powder or capsule or compressed into tablets for example.

(26) The probiotic bacterial strain is preferably a lactobacillus or a bifidobacterium. Preferably strains which produce only L (+) lactic acid are used. Examples of preferred Lactobacillus species are Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus reuteri. Particularly preferred strains are Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103, Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 (deposited in Oct. 2004 at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2714, Beijing, China 100080), Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 and Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM 1-2116. Examples of preferred Bifidobacterium species are Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium breve and Bifidobacterium longum. Particularly preferred strains are the strain of B. lactis sold by the Christian Hansen company of Denmark under the trade mark Bb12 and Bifidobacterium longum ATCC BAA-999 obtainable from Morinaga Milk Industry Co. Ltd. of Japan under the trade mark BB536.

(27) The preparation of the invention may provide between 10.sup.2 and 10.sup.10 cfu of probiotic bacteria for each gram of the prebiotic mixture.

(28) In a preferred aspect of the invention, the preparation described above is incorporated into a food product. In the context of the present invention, the term food product is intended to encompass any consumable matter. Hence, it may be a product intended for consumption by humans, in particular infant formula, growing up milk, and the like. However, consumption of the preparation is not restricted to infants and children In particular, the preparation of the invention can be incorporated into dehydrated milk or cereal mixtures.

(29) If the preparation of the invention is to be incorporated in infant formula or other milk-based nutritional composition, the composition may be prepared in any suitable manner known in the art. For example, an infant formula may be prepared by blending together the protein source, any carbohydrates other than lactose and the fat source in appropriate proportions. Emulsifiers may be added if desired. Vitamins and minerals may be added at this point but are usually added later to avoid thermal degradation. Any lipophilic vitamins, emulsifiers and the like may be dissolved into the fat source prior to blending. Water, preferably water which has been subjected to reverse osmosis, may then be mixed in to form a liquid mixture.

(30) The liquid mixture may then be thermally treated to reduce bacterial loads. For example, the liquid mixture may be rapidly heated to a temperature in the range of about 80 C. to about 110 C. for about 5 seconds to about 5 minutes. This may be carried out by steam injection or by heat exchanger, e.g. a plate heat exchanger.

(31) The liquid mixture may then be cooled to about 60 C. to about 85 C., for example by flash cooling. The liquid mixture may then be homogenised, for example in two stages at about 7 MPa to about 40 MPa in the first stage and about 2 MPa to about 14 MPa in the second stage. The homogenised mixture may then be further cooled to add any heat sensitive components such as vitamins and minerals. The pH and solids content of the homogenised mixture is conveniently standardised at this point.

(32) The homogenised mixture is transferred to a suitable drying apparatus, such as a spray drier or freeze drier, and converted to powder. The powder should have a moisture content of less than about 5% by weight.

(33) The preparation of the invention may be made up in advance and added directly to nutritional composition by dry mixing. Preferably, however, the individual components of the preparation are added separately to the nutritional composition in which case the prebiotic mixture is preferably added in the liquid phase immediately prior to drying and the probiotic bacterial strain is preferably added to the dried composition by thy mixing.

(34) The selected probiotic bacterial strain may be cultured according to any suitable method known in the art and prepared for addition to the infant formula by freeze-drying or spray-drying for example. Alternatively, bacterial strains can be bought from specialist suppliers such as Christian Hansen and Morinaga already prepared in a suitable form for addition to food products such as infant formula.

(35) If the prebiotic mixture has been prepared from an animal milk, for example as described below, and it is intended to add it to an infant formula, it may be convenient to add it without first removing all the lactose. As infant formula contains a carbohydrate component which is often wholly or partially constituted by lactose, it will be apparent to the person skilled in the art that the amount of carbohydrate in the infant formula will need to be adjusted to take into account the additional carbohydrate that will be added with the prebiotic mixture. The final concentration of the inventive preparation in the baby or infant food product or formula is preferably from 0.3 to 6.0%, preferably 0.75 to 4.0% by weight of dry matter. This corresponds to a concentration of from 0.2 to 8 grams per liter, preferably 1 to 5 g/l of reconstituted formula. However, these amounts should not be considered as limitative and should be adapted to the target population, for example based on the weight and age or health of the baby or infant. Preferably, the formula or feed containing the oligosaccharide mixture of the invention is fed to the baby at every feed.

(36) In addition to the preparation of the invention, a food product such as an infant formula may comprise one or more further oligosaccharides which are added separately up to an oligosaccharide content of 10 g/l of reconstituted or liquid formula.

(37) Although it is preferred to supplement food products specifically targeted towards infant or baby nutrition, it may also be beneficial to supplement food products not specifically targeted, or targeted to the adult population. For example, the oligosaccharide mixtures of the invention can be incorporated into healthcare nutrition products and nutritional products for the elderly. Such food products may include mixes for milk-based drinks, yoghurts, milk-based fermented products, and ice-creams, as well as cereal based products, among others.

(38) Surprisingly, it has been found that the prebiotic mixture in the preparations of the invention synergistically enhances the anti-pathogenic and immunomodulatory properties of the probiotic to produce a therapeutic effect which is markedly superior to the mixture of, for example, the same probiotic with a single prebiotic. The preparations of the invention and food products containing them are thus suitable for the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal infections caused by pathogens, particularly bacterial pathogens as well as infections of the upper respiratory tract such as otitis media. Food products containing preparations according to the invention are thus especially suitable for vulnerable populations such as babies and the elderly.

(39) Further, the preparations of the invention are suitable for boosting immune defenses for example by enhancing response to vaccines and reducing the duration and severity of infections as well as for the prevention and treatment of conditions related to the malfunctioning of the immune system in infants and young children such as food hypersensitivity, eczema, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and other atopic diseases.

(40) Another advantage of the preparations of the invention is that they promote the establishment of a bifidogenic intestinal microbiota in infants by increasing the relative metabolic activity of the Bifidobacteria species which dominate such intestinal microbiota in infants.

(41) The invention will now be illustrated by reference to the following examples.

Example 1

(42) 200,000 liters of a whey ultrafiltration permeate are pre-concentrated to 22% (ww) total solids (TS), pasteurized at about 75 C. for about 30 seconds and then concentrated by evaporation at 60 C. to reach a TS of 59% (ww). The liquid is cooled in a crystalliser at a rate of 2 C. per hour for a period of 24 hours to crystallise the lactose. Crystallised lactose is washed then removed by a wringer. The remaining liquid is clarified through a decanter. The 77000 liters at 17.7% TS obtained from the clarifier are re-concentrated by evaporation at 60 C. to reach a TS of 55% (ww) and subject to a second lactose crystallisation step under the same conditions as before. The 29000 liters at 20.5% TS of liquor thereby obtained are demineralised by a combination of electrodialysis and ion exchange in a manner known per se yielding 28500 liters of a 90% demineralised liquor at 17.3% TS. This liquor, which contains approximately 1.5 grams per liter of a mixture of about 30 wt % GalNAc1,3Gal1,4G1c and Ga11,6GalNAc1,3Ga11,4Glc, 50 wt % of Gal1,6Gal1,4G1c and Gal1,3Gal1,4G1c and 20 wt % of NeuAc2,3Gal1,4G1c and NeuAc2,6Gal1,4G1c, depending upon the starting material, may either be added directly to a food product such as an infant formula or may by further concentrated in a manner known per se to those skilled in the art.

(43) For example, the lactose remaining in the liquor may be hydrolysed into glucose and galactose and these monosaccharides may be either removed by nanofiltration or, if desired, the galactose may be at least partially polymerised for example by the action of (3-galactosidase to produce galacto-oligosaccharides which will also be retained by the nanofiltration membrane.

Example 2

(44) 100 kg of prebiotic mixture produced according to Example 1 at 50% TS are heated to 60 C. in a standard tank and the pH is adjusted to 6 to 6.5. 4.5 mg of Lactase F (Amano, Japan) are added per gram of TS and the mixture is held at 60 C. for three hours. Then the temperature is raised to 110 C. for 11 seconds by direct steam injection to inactivate the enzyme. The resulting liquid contains approximately 100 grams per liter of a mixture of about 10 wt % Ga1NAc1,3Gal1,4G1c and Gal1,6GalNAc1,3Ga11,4G1c, 87 wt % of Ga11,6Gal1,6G1c, Ga11,6Gal1,4G1c and Ga11,3Ga11,4G1c and 3 wt % of NeuAc2,3Ga11,4G1c and NeuAc2,6Gal1,4G1c It may either be added directly to a food product such as an infant formula or may be further concentrated as described above.

Example 3

(45) An example of the composition of an infant formula containing a preparation according to the present invention is given below.

(46) TABLE-US-00001 Nutrient per 100 kcal per litre Energy (kcal) 100 670 Protein (g) 1.83 12.3 Fat (g) 5.3 35.7 Linoleic acid (g) 0.79 5.3 a-Linolenic acid (mg) 101 675 Lactose (g) 11.2 74.7 OS mixture from Example 1 (g) 1.0 6.5 Minerals (g) 0.37 2.5 Na (mg) 23 150 K (mg) 89 590 CI (mg) 64 430 Ca (mg) 62 410 P (mg) 31 210 Mg (mg) 7 50 Mn (g) 8 50 Se (g) 2 13 Vitamin A (g RE) 105 700 Vitamin D (g) 1.5 10 Vitamin E (mg TE) 0.8 5.4 Vitamin K1 (g) 8 54 Vitamin C (mg) 10 67 Vitamin B1 (mg) 0.07 0.47 Vitamin B2 (mg) 0.15 1.0 Niacin (mg) 1 6.7 Vitamin B6 (mg) 0.075 0.50 Folic acid (g) 9 60 Pantothenic acid (mg) 0.45 3 Vitamin B12 (g) 0.3 2 Biotin (g) 2.2 15 Choline (mg) 10 67 Fe (mg) 1.2 8 I (g) 15 100 Cu (mg) 0.06 0.4 Zn (mg) 0.75 5 L. rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 2.3 10.sup.9 cfu/g of powder

Example 4

(47) In vitro experiments were performed to compare the efficacy of preparations according to the invention using two different strains of probiotic bacteria with the efficacy of mixtures of the same probiotic bacteria and other prebiotics in prevention of pathogenic infection. Clostridium difficile toxin A was selected as a representative toxin from pathogenic bacteria.

(48) Monolayers of intestinal epithelial T84 cells grown on transwell plates were incubated with (i) a probiotic alone, (ii) a prebiotic alone, or (iii) a combination of probiotic and prebiotic. After a preincubation for 2 hr at 37 C., 5% CO2, T84 cells were challenged with toxin A from C. difficile at a concentration of 100 ng/ml. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER), which served as a marker to assess protection against the action of toxin A, was monitored at regular intervals for up to 24 hr. A normalized protection score was calculated.

(49) The probiotic bacterial strains were L. paracasei (CNCM 1-2116) and L. rhamnosus (ATCC 53103). Both strains were used at final concentrations of 10.sup.8 cfu/l.

(50) The prebiotics used were the prebiotic mixture described herein at 1 g/l; fructooligosaccharides (Raftilose P95, Orafti, Belgium); galactooligosaccharides (Vivinal GOS, DOMO, The Netherlands) and sialyllactose (Kyowa Hakko Kogyo, Japan) at 10 g/l.

(51) The results are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 1 compares the results obtained with the probiotic alone, the prebiotic mixture alone and the preparation of the invention for two probiotic strains. FIG. 2 compares the results obtained with the same probiotic strains as used in FIG. 1 and fructooligosaccharides at 20 g/l; galactooligosaccharides at 20 g/l and sialyllactose at 10 g/l. Lactose (Sigma) at 20 g/l was used as a control.

(52) From FIG. 1, it may be seen that the preparations of the invention had a significant synergistic effect against C. difficile toxin A compared with that provided by the individual components (i.e. prebiotic mixture and probiotic strain) alone. From FIG. 2, it may be seen that a comparable effect was not achieved when the same probiotic bacterial strains were tested in combination with fructooligosaccharides, galactooligosaccharides, or sialyllactose individually. It may be seen that moderate protection was achieved using L. rhamnosus in combination with sialyllactose, but only at 10 g/l and not at 1 g/l as with the preparation of the invention.

Example 5

(53) In vivo experiments were performed to compare the effects on the intestinal microbiota of supplementation with the prebiotic mixture alone, with a probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis alone and with a preparation according to the invention in a gnotobiotic animal model of human infant microbiota.

(54) Germ free mice were gavaged with a model of human infant microbiota and the microbiota was allowed to establish itself for two weeks. The mice were then divided into four groups:a first group who received 3% by weight of the prebiotic mixture alone in their food, a second group who received Bifidobacterium lactis CNCM 1-3446 (NCC 2818) in their drinking water, a third group who received both the prebiotic-supplemented food and the probiotic supplemented water and a fourth control group. The faecal microbiota was monitored during the course of the study (two weeks) at the end of which period the animals were sacrificed and the small intestine microbiota was also investigated.

(55) The results are shown in FIGS. 3, 4 and 5. From these Figures, it may be seen that a bifidogenic intestinal microbiota, as evidenced by the Bifidobacterium breve counts in the small intestine (FIG. 3) and decreased Staphylococci and Clostridium perfringens counts in faeces (FIGS. 4 and 5) is synergistically promoted by the preparation according to the invention compared to its individual components.

Example 6

(56) In vivo experiments were performed to compare the effects on establishment and metabolic activity of Bifidobacterium longum in the gastrointestinal tract of germ free mice of supplementation with the prebiotic mixture alone, with a probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain alone and with a preparation according to the invention.

(57) Germ free mice were gavaged with a model of human infant microbiota and microbiota establishment was monitored over time by plate counting and by evaluation of 16S rRNA levels indicating metabolic activity. 16S rRNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction, products were separated on a denaturing gradient gel and quantified relative the constant 16S rRNA levels of E. coli which served as internal standard. The following treatments were compared: control diet and control drink (water); control diet supplemented with 3% of the prebiotic mixture and water; control diet and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 (NCC 4007) in the drinking water; control diet supplemented with 3% of the prebiotic mixture and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 in the drinking water.

(58) The results are shown in FIG. 6. The preparation according to the invention synergistically boosted general metabolic activity of resident Bifidobacterium longum during establishment of a human infant microbiota in germ free mice. Human baby microbiota resident B. longum counts were at similar levels after 14 days in the control group and the groups receiving the probiotic and the prebiotic mixture alone whereas relative metabolic activity was synergistically and significantly increased in the group given the preparation according to the invention (FIG. 6D as compared to 6A, B, C).